The Role and Management of Public Service Broadcasting As Part of the Regional/Local Media Landscape – Comparative Analyses Between Japan’S NHK and the UK’S BBC
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ishikawa Access Map Kanazawa City Center
Golf Courses KANAZAWA CITY CENTER MAP A great number of scenic golf courses exist in Ishikawa, taking advantage of the many magnificent natural landscapes. Imagine golfing on top of a hill in Noto with shots seemingly descending down to the Sea of Japan, or at the foot of Mt. Hakusan where golfers dauntlessly shoot towars the massive mountainous background. Ishikawa of- 15 16 fers you a unique opportunity to not just play golf, but be one with nature as well! HEGURAJIMA Island The Country Club Noto Kanazawa Links Golf Club ❶● ⓭● 17 14 0768-52-3131 076-237-2222 http://www.cc-noto.co.jp/ Hotel Kanazawa ⓮● Kanazawa 6 ❷● Notojima Golf and Central Country Club 18 Asanogawa Country Club 076-251-0011 River Wajima 0767-85-2311 Kanazawa Kobo-Nagaya Senmaida Rice http://www.notojima-golf.jp/ ● Hakusan Country Club Hyakuban-gai 0761-51-4181 Shopping Mall Terrece http://www.incl.ne.jp/golf/haku/haku1.html ❸● Tokinodai Country Club 13 Suzuyaki Museum 0767-27-1121 4 of Art http://www.tokinodai.co.jp/ ● Kaga Huyo Country Club Wajima 0761-65-2020 2 12 Onsen ❹● Wakura Golf Club 3 0767-52-2580 ● Twin Fields Golf Club 2 Suzu 0761-47-4500 7 Mitsuke-jima http://www.wakuragolfclub.co.jp/ 1 5 Onsen http://www.twin-fields.com/ Hotel Nikko 19 Island ❺● Noto Golf Club Ishikawa Wajima Urushi 0767-32-1212 ● Komatsu Country Club ANA Crowne Plaza Hotel Museum of Art http://www.daiwaresort.co.jp/noto-gc/ 0761-43-3030 5 NANATSUJIMA ❻● Chirihama Country Club ● Komatsu Public Golf Course Island 0767-28-4411 0761-65-2277 10 ❼● Noto Country Club ● Kaga Country Club 0767-28-3155 -
The Decline of Broadcasters' Public Interest Obligations*
SPECTRUM POLICY PROGRAM POLICY BACKGROUNDER March 29, 2004 The Decline of Broadcasters’ Public Interest Obligations* The Communications Act of 1934 and its predecessor, the interest obligations, but they didn’t necessarily object to Radio Act of 1927, mandates that the Federal their codification because it provided them with more Communications Commission regulate broadcasting in the certainty about the standard by which they would be judged “public interest, convenience, or necessity.” This at renewal time. And, of course, they continued to use continues to be the mandate of the FCC, and the “public prime broadcast frequencies free of charge. interest” part of the phrase appears 40 times in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. What broadcasters really hated, however, was the prospect that they might lose their licenses. Licenses to use the The “public interest” mandate is notoriously vague. airwaves were hugely valuable. In one famous phrase, they Contentious debate over its meaning has been almost were described as a “license to print money.” Thus, continuous since passage of the Communications Act 70 incumbent broadcasters did everything they could to reduce years ago. the threat that at the end of their license term they might lose their license. In other words, they attacked the essence For purposes of this historical account of the public interest of the public interest standard, which was fundamentally mandate, we give it the meaning: “compensation to the procedural rather than substantive in nature. public for the use of the public airwaves.” This interpretation provides a simple framework to explain how Their lobbying was highly successful. Over time, the the public interest mandate has evolved since it was first duration of broadcast licenses was increased from 3 to 5 to embedded as the foundation of broadcast law. -
Annex 2: Providers Required to Respond (Red Indicates Those Who Did Not Respond Within the Required Timeframe)
Video on demand access services report 2016 Annex 2: Providers required to respond (red indicates those who did not respond within the required timeframe) Provider Service(s) AETN UK A&E Networks UK Channel 4 Television Corp All4 Amazon Instant Video Amazon Instant Video AMC Networks Programme AMC Channel Services Ltd AMC Networks International AMC/MGM/Extreme Sports Channels Broadcasting Ltd AXN Northern Europe Ltd ANIMAX (Germany) Arsenal Broadband Ltd Arsenal Player Tinizine Ltd Azoomee Barcroft TV (Barcroft Media) Barcroft TV Bay TV Liverpool Ltd Bay TV Liverpool BBC Worldwide Ltd BBC Worldwide British Film Institute BFI Player Blinkbox Entertainment Ltd BlinkBox British Sign Language Broadcasting BSL Zone Player Trust BT PLC BT TV (BT Vision, BT Sport) Cambridge TV Productions Ltd Cambridge TV Turner Broadcasting System Cartoon Network, Boomerang, Cartoonito, CNN, Europe Ltd Adult Swim, TNT, Boing, TCM Cinema CBS AMC Networks EMEA CBS Reality, CBS Drama, CBS Action, Channels Partnership CBS Europe CBS AMC Networks UK CBS Reality, CBS Drama, CBS Action, Channels Partnership Horror Channel Estuary TV CIC Ltd Channel 7 Chelsea Football Club Chelsea TV Online LocalBuzz Media Networks chizwickbuzz.net Chrominance Television Chrominance Television Cirkus Ltd Cirkus Classical TV Ltd Classical TV Paramount UK Partnership Comedy Central Community Channel Community Channel Curzon Cinemas Ltd Curzon Home Cinema Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd Demand5 Digitaltheatre.com Ltd www.digitaltheatre.com Discovery Corporate Services Discovery Services Play -
Kanazawa Port Safety Guide
Kanazawa Port Safety Guide 11..MMaaiiinn FFeeaatttuurreess ooff KKaannaazzaawwaa PPoorrttt 22..CCoolllllleecctttiiioonn ooff IIInnffoorrmmaatttiiioonn ccoonncceerrnniiinngg SShhiiippss uussiiinngg KKaannaazzaawwaa PPoorrttt aanndd WWeeaattthheerr//SSeeaa CCoonnddiiitttiiioonnss 33..IIInn ccaassee ooff bbaadd wweeaattthheerr ccoonnddiiitttiiioonnss 44..IIImmppoorrtttaannttt pprreeccaauutttiiioonnss ffoorr nniiigghhttt tttiiimmee ppoorrttt eenntttrryy oorr ddeeppaarrtttuurree 55..CCoommmmuunniiiccaatttiiioonn nneetttwwoorrkk iiinn ccaassee ooff aann aacccciiiddeennttt oorr ffiiirree 66..RReeffeerreennccee MMaatteerriiaall April 2020 Kanazawa Port Council for Maritime Affairs INDEX Introduction ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 1.Main Features of Kanazawa Port ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2 1.1 Kanazawa Port Facilities・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2 1.2 Climate ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 4 1.3 Wind Conditions・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 5 1.4 Sea Conditions・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 6 2.Collection of Information concerning Ships using Kanazawa Port and Weather/Sea Conditions・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 7 2.1 Information regarding ships entering and leaving the port・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 7 2.2 Collection of information concerning weather and sea conditions・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 9 3.In case of weather conditions・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ -
Addressing Social Issues
Key Issue 4 Addressing social issues How Aeon Happy Yellow Receipt Campaign works Community Involvement Concluding Comprehensive Cooperation Agreements Making Contributions to Local Communities Cumulative total of Aeon has entered cooperation agreements with local ¥2,216.44 million governments to effectively combine respective resources Aeon Happy Yellow Receipt Campaign in goods donated as of for disaster preparedness, social welfare, and environmental February 2014 conservation, and, through Local WAON cards, to stimulate A group of customers that took part in Learning how to use a fire extinguisher Countless volunteer organizations* throughout local the Hanagasa Festival as part of the Daijobu Campaign commerce and tourism. The first Agreement was concluded in communities in Japan are in need of support. At the same time, June 2010 with the Osaka Prefectural government. At the end of AEON Volunteer countless Aeon customers would like to support organizations Customers organizations June 2014, we had agreements with 44 prefectural governments devoted to their local communities. Aeon, as a local community Issuing Local WAON Cards and 11 government-ordinance-designated cities. member, launched the Aeon Happy Yellow Receipt Campaign Through these agreements, we are, providing emergency to link customers and volunteer organizations. Customers Place yellow receipts Stores calculate the Receive goods worth 1% of WAON is a system of e-money pre-paid cards available at over supplies and emergency shelters for times of disaster, holding in the box for the total value of receipts the total value of receipts participate in the Campaign simply by taking the yellow receipts organization they wish for each organization contributed to the cause 176,000 participating stores throughout Japan. -
Investor Information 2016(4.7MB)
INVESTOR INFORMATION 2016 Connecting to the future Tokyo Broadcasting System Holdings, Inc. Consolidated Financial Highlights Net Sales Operating Income (Millions of Yen) (Millions of Yen) 354,338 346,538 352,351 347,817 348,539 17,179 16,188 15,696 15,728 12,162 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 Ordinary Income Prot Attributable to Owners of Parent (Millions of Yen) 22,678 (Millions of Yen) 18,915 14,497 18,096 17,671 12,811 11,671 14,313 9,173 9,644 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 Total Assets Total Net Assets (Millions of Yen) (Millions of Yen) 653,732 649,970 456,118 458,208 555,159 559,626 579,039 385,971 344,473 322,597 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 12/3 13/3 14/3 15/3 16/3 Contents 2 To Our Stakeholders 13 Major Indices 3 At a Glance 15 Segment Information 4 Organization 17 TBS Television 5 Corporate Data 20 Financial Data of Major Group Companies 6 Business Report 22 TBS Networks 9 Consolidated Financial Statements Financial Figures The nancial gures used in this report are those used in the Japanese ”Tanshin,” which has been created in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Japanese Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. Thus, all gures have been rounded down to the nearest million yen. Forward-Looking Statements This report contains forward-looking statements based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available. -
The Fast Train to Kanazawa
Feature THE NEW AGE OF RAIL An E7 series bullet train on the Hokuriku Shinkansen line The Fast Train to Kanazawa The expanding national network of Shinkansen HakodateHokuto Stations. More than 2,000 km, lines continues to boost local economies. from KagoshimaChuo Station in Kyushu to Shin HakodateHokuto Station in Hokkaido, is now con TOSHIO MATSUBARA nected by Shinkansen lines. With the extension of the Hokuriku Shinkansen ince the Tokaido Shinkansen line began line to Kanazawa, the travel time between Tokyo and operations between Tokyo and Osaka in Kanazawa is 2 hours and 30 minutes at the shortest. 1964, other lines connecting cities through In the first year of the Hokuriku Shinkansen line’s Sout Japan have been developed. The Shin operation, 9.26 million passen kansen lines are a very important part of the basic gers used the line from Nagano infrastructure and are a stimulus to Japan’s econ Station to Kanazawa, which is omy. For example, the number of passengers on about three times the number of the Tokaido Shinkansen line was about 11 million passengers (3.14 million) when in the first year of its operation and after ten years limited expresses on the regular it exceeded the 100 million mark. As the number railway were used. Shin-Hakodate-Hokuto of businesspeople making day trips between Tokyo The economic rip Hokkaido Shinkansen and Osaka increased sharply, the Tokaido Shinkan ple effect is said to Shin-Aomori sen line provided a backbone for Japan’s high eco have been 67.8 bil Akita Shinkansen nomic growth. -
Daftar Acara Di Surat Kabar, Stasiun Televisi Ini Ditulis Sebagai Mainichi Terebi Mainichi Hōsō Atau MBS Mainichi
BAB II GAMBARAN UMUM KOREA SELATAN DAN KOREA UTARA A. Terpecahnya Korea Selatan dan Korea Utara Tragedi dua Korea mulai ketika Perang Dunia II berakhir pada tahun 1945 karena Semenanjung Korea dibagi dua oleh Persatuan Bangsa-bangsa (PBB) yang dipimpin oleh Amerika Serikat (AS) dan Blok komunis yang dipimpin oleh Uni Soviet. Pembangunan Semenanjung Korea ini terjadi tanpa konsultasi dengan Perwakilan Korea dan bertentangan dengan kemauan rakyat Korea. Uni Soviet dan Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) menanam komunisme dan memberikan berbagai senjata api kepada Korea Utara. Sedangkan AS dan negara-negara Barat mendukung Korea Selatan untuk mengembangkan demokrasi dan kapitalisme. Dengan demikian, Semenanjung Korea segera menjadi “show window”-nya Perang Dingin di Asia Timur selama setengah abad (Seung-Yoon dan Mas’oed, 2007: 114). Perang Saudara antar Korea (Korean War) dipecahkan oleh serangan mendadak pihak Korea Utara pada bulan Juni 1950. Pihak Korea Selatan yang sama sekali tidak menduga serangan itu, sehingga tidak ada pilihan kecuali mundur saja ke arah selatan. PBB segera mengirimkan pasukan sekutu terdiri dari 16 negara ke medan Perang Korea. Kali ini pasukan Korea Utara mundur ke arah utara. Pada waktu itu ratusan ribu pasukan RRC membantu pasukan Korea Utara. Akhirnya kedua belah pihak antara Korea Selatan-pasukan PBB dan Korea Utara- RRC mencapai persetujuan untuk genjatan senjata dan menandatangani perjanjian 32 pada tahun 1953. Perang ini tidak ada yang kalah dan tidak ada yang menang, hanya ada kesengsaraan dan korban. Selama tiga setengah tahun, Perang Saudara antar Korea mengakibatkan jutaan korban manusia dan menghancurkan segala prasarana di Semenanjung Korea. Sejak itu kedua Korea saling memusnahkan satu sama lain. -
Broadcast License Renewal and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 1996 Not With a Bang But a Whimper: Broadcast License Renewal and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Not With a Bang But a Whimper: Broadcast License Renewal and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 29 Conn. L. Rev. 243 (1996). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Not With a Bang But a Whimper: Broadcast License Renewal and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Liu LEvi In 1969, public outrage derailed a bill providing that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") could not con- sider competing applications for broadcast licenses unless it first found that renewal of the incumbent's license would not be in the public interest.' Citizen groups claimed that eliminating comparative challenges to incumbent broadcasters was "back-door racism" and reinforced the under-representation of minorities in broadcasting.2 They decried the bill as a "vicious ... attempt to limit the efforts of the black community to challenge the prevailing racist practices of the vast majority of TV stations."3 When the FCC thereupon issued a policy statement adopting a similar reform of the comparative renewal process, it was reversed by * Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law. -
Restoring Historical Understandings of the “Public Interest” Standard of American Broadcasting: an Exploration of the Fairness Doctrine
International Journal of Communication 7 (2013), 89–109 1932–8036/20130005 Restoring Historical Understandings of the “Public Interest” Standard of American Broadcasting: An Exploration of the Fairness Doctrine CHRISTINA LEFEVRE–GONZALEZ University of Colorado, Boulder The “public interest” standard is a phrase that American broadcast regulation has not clearly defined throughout its history. Media scholars have attempted to locate the “true” meaning of the public interest standard by historicizing its use through broad analyses of broadcast regulation, but this approach has provided inadequate frameworks for understanding how the public interest standard has informed broadcast policy. By centering its historical analysis on the Fairness Doctrine, this article uncovers four dominant definitions for the public interest standard: first, as an enforcer of structure and efficiency of the spectrum; second, as part of the trusteeship of licensed broadcasters; third, for social justice and reform; and fourth, for the tastes and preferences of the public. The “public interest” is a phrase that, in the words of Richard Weaver (1953), possesses a “charismatic” quality. Political scientist Frank Sorauf (1957) described the concept as reflecting “the highest standard of governmental action, the measure of the greatest wisdom or morality in government” (p. 616). Some scholars believe that this idyllic phrase, an important rhetorical feature of American broadcast policy, possesses an indiscernible meaning that is susceptible to political will. Legal scholars Krattenmaker and Powe (1994) describe the standard as “either an empty concept or one that is infinitely manipulable” (p. 143). Zlotlow (2004) argues that the poorly defined standard “was both an empty concept and infinitely manipulable” (p. -
D Goryacheva.Pdf
МИНИСТЕРСТВО НАУКИ И ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ РОССИЙСКАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ НАУК ДАЛЬНЕВОСТОЧНОЕ ОТДЕЛЕНИЕ ИНСТИТУТ ИСТОРИИ, АРХЕОЛОГИИ И ЭТНОГРАФИИ НАРОДОВ ДАЛЬНЕГО ВОСТОКА На правах рукописи ГОРЯЧЕВА ЕЛЕНА АЛЕКСАНДРОВНА Российско-японские отношения начала XXI в. в освещении японских СМИ (на примере деятельности корпорации NHK) Диссертация на соискание учёной степени кандидата исторических наук Специальность 07.00.03 – Всеобщая история (Новая и новейшая история) Научный руководитель: Академик РАН, д. и. н., проф. В. Л. Ларин Владивосток 2019 2 Содержание Введение ................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Политика Японии в Северо-Восточной Азии в XXI веке .................. 26 1.1. Эволюция внешнеполитических приоритетов Японии в Северо- Восточной Азии и политики в отношении к России в начале XXI века ......... 26 1.2. Телевидение как инструмент трансляции внешнеполитических приоритетов в Японии в XXI веке ....................................................................... 48 Глава 2. Роль и место NHK в жизни общества Японии в XXI веке ................. 62 2.1. NHK в начале XXI века: организационная структура, особенности функционирования и взаимодействия с правительством. ................................ 62 2.2. Влияние NHK на формирование мнения населения страны об актуальных проблемах внешней политики и международных отношений Японии ........... 83 Глава 3. История российско-японских отношений в начале XXI века ......... 106 в интерпретации -
Standardization of Companion Device Architecture of Hybridcast
Standardization of Companion Device Architecture of Hybridcast Japan BroadcastingHisayuki Corporation Ohmata (NHK) 1. Introduction standards were established by IPTV Forum Japan and ARIB. With the recent growth in popularity of the internet and Section 2 of this paper introduces the current status and issues smartphones, it is now easy for information and services to be of collaboration between broadcasting and internet services, and accessed by anyone, anywhere. On the other hand, television section 3 introduces the standard technologies that are used in broadcasting has been the principal source of media in current integrated broadcast-broadband services and companion people’s living-rooms for about the last sixty years. However, screen services. Section 4 then summarizes the newly standardized if broadcasting is to retain its position as a reliable, topical and companion device architecture of Hybridcast, section 5 presents familiar communication medium, then we believe that it will have some examples of services that use this architecture, and section to become capable of cooperating with a wide variety of other 6 describes the trends in Japanese domestic and international services in the future in order to keep up with remarkable changes standardization. Finally, section 7 discusses the future prospects of in people’s lifestyles [1]. this technology, and concludes with a summary. In 2013, as a means of facilitating cooperation between 2. Current status and issues of collaboration broadcasting and internet services, an integrated broadcast- between broadcasting and internet services broadband system called Hybridcast[2] was standardized by the IPTV Forum Japan and the Association of Radio Industries and Since the start of broadcasting in 1953, television has spawned Businesses (ARIB).