DOCSLIB.ORG

Judges Service Oct 2013-12-11 – Lists of Acceptance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judges Service Oct 2013-12-11 – Lists of Acceptance LISTS OF JUDGES WHO ACCEPTED INVITATIONS TO THE JUDGES’ SERVICES IN 2013, 2012, 2011 1. There follow lists of the judges who accepted invitations to attend the Judges’ Services at Westminster Abbey in October 2013, 2012 and 2011. 2. In response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, these lists were disclosed in December 2013 by the Crown Office (part of the Ministry of Justice). Normally the MoJ publishes on its website its monthly FoI log of its responses to such requests, but it has not done so for these lists. So, they are being published here for the first time. The MoJ has advised that lists of judges who actually attended these services are not kept. These lists are therefore the closest approximation. 3. The MoJ has stated that invitations are issued: each year to all Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court Judges; on a three-year rota to Circuit Judges, Tribunal Judges, Masters and Registrars; and annually to a proportion of District Judges and some other judges. The lists for these three years thus cover those judges subject to that rota, except any recently appointed who may not yet have received an invitation. 4. Invitations are issued jointly by the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor (a government minister) and the Dean of Westminster Abbey (a Church of England clergyman). The Judges’ Services are held as religious services within the rites of the Church of England, but are not open to the public. Judges participate in their official capacities, wearing judicial robes, in working time, and at considerable public expense. 5. The publication of these lists enables any criminal defendant or civil party or their representatives, where a religious issue is likely to be, or becomes, material in the case, to see if the judge hearing that case has accepted an invitation to participate in such a service. 6. Thus consideration can be given to raising a legal argument that, if the judge did so attend, his or her impartiality on the religious issue may have been compromised, or be seen to have been compromised, on the basis of an actual or perceived personal interest. Such an argument might apply in connection with a recusal application or when advancing grounds for appeal. 7. These lists include some persons who are not UK judges. To assist, the heading of each of the three lists supplied has been adumbrated and each page shows any continuation of a sub-heading and the relevant year. Page 1 of 27 List of Judiciary who accepted invitations to the Judges’ Service in Westminster Abbey in October 2013 LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF SESSION The Rt. Hon. Lord Gill LORD JUSTICE-CLERK (COURT OF SESSION) Lord Woolman (Lord Justice-Clerk unable to attend) LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND The Rt. Hon. Sir Declan Morgan NORTHERN IRELAND JUDICIARY The Hon. Mr Justice Treacy His Honour Judge Babington REPUBLIC OF IRELAND JUDICIARY The Hon. Mr. Justice John MacMenamin (Supreme Crt) The Hon. Mr. Justice Barry White (High Crt) HEADS OF DIVISIONS (Bold) & SUPREME COURT The Rt. Hon. The Lord Chief Justice of England & Wales The Rt. Hon. The Master of the Rolls The Rt. Hon. The Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury The Rt. Hon. The Baroness Hale of Richmond The Rt. Hon. The Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore The Rt. Hon. The Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony The Rt. Hon. Lord Wilson of Culworth The Rt. Hon. Lord Sumption, O.B.E The Rt. Hon. Lord Reed The Rt. Hon. Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill, C.V.O. The Rt. Hon. Lord Toulson The Rt. Hon. Lord Hughes of Ombersley The Rt. Hon. Lord Hodge The Rt. Hon. The President of The Queen’s Bench Division The Rt. Hon. The President of the Family Division The Rt. Hon. The Chancellor of the High Court LORDS JUSTICES OF APPEAL The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Laws The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Maurice Kay The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Moore-Bick The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Moses The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Richards The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Leveson The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Rimer The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Jackson The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Goldring The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Elias Page 2 of 27 LORDS JUSTICES OF APPEAL (cont.) 2013 (cont.) The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Patten The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Black, D.B.E. The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Gross The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Tomlinson The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Rafferty, D.B.E. The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice McFarlane The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Davis The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Kitchin The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Jones The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Treacy The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice McCombe The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Beatson The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Gloster, D.B.E., The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Ryder, T.D., The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Briggs The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Floyd The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Fulford The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Macur, D.B.E The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Christopher Clarke The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Vos The Rt. Hon. Lady Justice Sharp, D.B.E., HIGH COURT JUDGES The Hon. Mr. Justice Holman The Hon. Mrs. Justice Hogg, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Burton The Hon. Mr Justice Silber The Hon. Mr Justice Henriques The Hon. Mr Justice Coleridge The Hon. Mr. Justice Ouseley The Hon. Mr. Justice Owen The Hon. Mr. Justice Mitting The Hon. Mr. Justice Keith The Hon. Mr. Justice Cooke The Hon. Mr. Justice Field The Hon. Mr. Justice Simon The Hon. Mrs. Justice Cox, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Tugendhat The Hon. Mrs. Justice Pauffley, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Wood The Hon. Mr. Justice Mann The Hon. Mr. Justice Bean The Hon. Mr. Justice Warren The Hon. Mr. Justice Openshaw The Hon. Mrs. Justice Swift, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Langstaff The Hon. Mr. Justice Ramsey The Hon. Mr. Justice Irwin Page 3 of 27 HIGH COURT JUDGES (cont.) 2013 (cont.) The Hon. Mr. Justice Teare The Hon. Mr. Justice Griffith Williams The Hon. Mr. Justice Henderson The Hon. Mr. Justice Moylan The Hon. Mr. Justice Morgan The Hon. Mr. Justice Flaux The Hon. Mr. Justice Norris The Hon. Mr. Justice Akenhead The Hon. Mr. Justice Foskett The Hon. Mr. Justice Barling The Hon. Mr. Justice Coulson The Hon. Mrs. Justice King, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice MacDuff The Hon. Mr. Justice Burnett The Hon. Mrs. Justice Parker, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Sales The Hon. Mrs. Justice Proudman, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Hamblen The Hon. Mr. Justice Hickinbottom The Hon. Mr. Justice Holroyde The Hon. Mr. Justice Kenneth Parker The Hon. Mr. Justice Baker The Hon. Mr. Justice Newey The Hon. Mrs. Justice Nicola Davies, D.B.E., The Hon. Mr. Justice Spencer The Hon. Mr. Justice Jackson The Hon. Mr. Justice Lindblom The Hon. Mrs. Justice Theis, D.B.E., The Hon. Mr. Justice Globe The Hon. Mr. Justice Hildyard The Hon. Mr. Justice Popplewell The Hon. Mr. Justice Moor The Hon. Mrs. Justice Lang, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Singh The Hon. Mr. Justice Haddon-Cave The Hon. Mr. Justice Males The Hon. Mrs. Justice Asplin, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Stuart-Smith The Hon. Mr. Justice Leggatt The Hon. Mr. Justice Cobb The Hon. Mr. Justice Baker The Hon. Mr. Justice Stewart The Hon. Mr. Justice Birss The Hon. Mr. Justice Keehan The Hon. Mrs. Justice Rose, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Jay The Hon. Mr. Justice Dingemans The Hon. Mr. Justice Lewis Page 4 of 27 HIGH COURT JUDGES (cont.) 2013 (cont.) The Hon. Mrs. Justice Carr, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Hayden The Hon. Mrs. Justice Patterson, D.B.E. The Hon. Mrs. Justice Andrews, D.B.E. The Hon. Mr. Justice Phillips The Hon. Mr. Justice Green The Hon. Mr. Justice Nugee CIRCUIT JUDGES - Annual invitations by virtue of office RECORDER OF LIVERPOOL His Honour Judge Goldstone, Q.C. RESIDENT JUDGES His Honour Judge Chapple (Inner London) His Honour Judge McCreath (Southwark) COUNCIL OF HER MAJESTY'S CIRCUIT JUDGES Her Honour Judge Plumstead (President) His Honour Judge Dutton (Snr Vice-Pres) His Honour Judge Bidder, Q.C. (Hon. Sec.) His Honour Judge Andrew Barnett (Membership Sec.) RECORDER AND COMMON SERJEANT OF LONDON His Honour Judge Barker, Q.C. His Honour Judge Hilliard, Q.C. PRESIDENT, UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM CHAMBER The Hon. Mr. Justice McCloskey (Based in Northern Ireland) UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGES David Demack, Esq. David Allen, Esq. John Freeman, Esq. Kate Eshun Henry Latter, Esq. Jonathan Perkins, Esq. George Warr, Esq. Hugo Storey, Esq. Judith Gleeson Alistair McGeachy, Esq. Richard Chalkley, Esq. Mark Rowland, Esq. Douglas May, Esq., Q.C. Paula Gray Elizabeth Potter Stuart Williams, Esq. Mary Clarke Page 5 of 27 UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGES (cont.) 2013 (cont.) Mark Hinchliffe, Esq. CIRCUIT JUDGES ROTA Her Honour Judge Heather Anderson His Honour Judge Atherton Her Honour Judge Badley His Honour Judge Stuart Baker His Honour Judge Ball, Q.C., Her Honour Judge Bancroft His Honour Judge Barclay His Honour Judge Barklem His Honour Judge Barrie His Honour Judge Bedford His Honour Judge Peter Benson His Honour Judge Bevan, Q.C. Her Honour Judge Boye-Anawomah His Honour Judge Brasse His Honour Judge Robert Alan Brown Her Honour Judge Cahill, Q.C. His Honour Judge Andrew Campbell His Honour Judge Carey Her Honour Judge Catterson His Honour Judge Coleman His Honour Judge Cooke, Q.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Padfield Wonders Aloud (Do Contact Me on [email protected])
    University of Leeds Centre for Criminal Justice Studies Justice in the Criminal Courts in the 21st Century What are criminal courts for? Nicky Padfield wonders aloud (do contact me on [email protected]) VERY VERY DRAFT Introduction I am taking the opportunity as the first speaker at this conference to raise some big and/or broad questions. The paper is not as developed as I would like: I shall dig more into history, theory, law and practice in due course. But, in essence, my argument is that this big picture allows us to remember important principles. Many of the speakers who follow will focus on individual aspects of the trial process, often presenting original empirical research. Here I go back to basics. What is a trial? A public process which compels defendants to answer a charge of criminal wrongdoing. The outcome is often a serious sanction. Obviously, trials have to be fair. That does not simply mean they should not be unfair. Should we focus on ways in which public courts can promote fairness and justice, and indeed social cohesion? Swift justice has merits, but does not necessarily achieve just outcomes. Non-public ‗diversion‘ is equally dangerous. I will briefly raise some of the criminological literature on compliance, legitimacy and desistance – but speak up also for human rights and the rule of law - a big agenda! History For the purpose of this paper, I took as my starting point a series of riot trials, at three different moments in English history. Serendipitously, when the riots of 2011 were still recent, I happened upon a book called the Report of the Trials for Rioting at Ely and Littleport, 1816 (Warren, ed, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Women Readers of Middle Temple Celebrating 100 Years of Women at Middle Temple the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales
    The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple Middle Society Honourable the The of 2019 Issue 59 Michaelmas 2019 Issue 59 Women Readers of Middle Temple Celebrating 100 Years of Women at Middle Temple The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales Practice Note (Relevance of Law Reporting) [2019] ICLR 1 Catchwords — Indexing of case law — Structured taxonomy of subject matter — Identification of legal issues raised in particular cases — Legal and factual context — “Words and phrases” con- strued — Relevant legislation — European and International instruments The common law, whose origins were said to date from the reign of King Henry II, was based on the notion of a single set of laws consistently applied across the whole of England and Wales. A key element in its consistency was the principle of stare decisis, according to which decisions of the senior courts created binding precedents to be followed by courts of equal or lower status in later cases. In order to follow a precedent, the courts first needed to be aware of its existence, which in turn meant that it had to be recorded and published in some way. Reporting of cases began in the form of the Year Books, which in the 16th century gave way to the publication of cases by individual reporters, known collectively as the Nominate Reports. However, by the middle of the 19th century, the variety of reports and the variability of their quality were such as to provoke increasing criticism from senior practitioners and the judiciary. The solution proposed was the establishment of a body, backed by the Inns of Court and the Law Society, which would be responsible for the publication of accurate coverage of the decisions of senior courts in England and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT For Year to 31 March 2010 ANNUAL REPORT For Year to 31 March 2012 June 2012 Judicial Studies Committee Scotland JUDICIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2011 LORD PRESIDENT HAMILTON (PRESIDENT OF THE JSC) THE HON LORD BRODIE (CHAIRMAN) THE HON LORD MALCOLM (VICE CHAIRMAN) SHERIFF T WELSH QC (DIRECTOR) SHERIFF A G D THORNTON (DEPUTY DIRECTOR) SHERIFF PRINCIPAL R A DUNLOP QC SHERIFF J K MITCHELL SHERIFF M J FLETCHER REV R NEILSON, VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE JUSTICES ASSOCIATION MR A CLASPER, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE MS B CAMPBELL, DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE DR J McCLURE CBE, FORMER HEAD TEACHER OF ST GEORGE’S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS COMMITTEE MEMBERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2012 LORD PRESIDENT HAMILTON (PRESIDENT OF THE JSC) (UNTIL JUNE 2012) LORD PRESIDENT GILL (PRESIDENT OF THE JSC) (FROM JUNE 2012) THE HON LORD BRODIE (CHAIRMAN) THE HON LORD MALCOLM (VICE CHAIRMAN) SHERIFF T WELSH QC (DIRECTOR) SHERIFF A J M DUFF (DEPUTY DIRECTOR) SHERIFF PRINCIPAL M STEPHEN SHERIFF L D R FOULIS SHERIFF M J FLETCHER SHERIFF I FLEMING REV R NEILSON, VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE JUSTICES ASSOCIATION MR A CLASPER, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE MS B CAMPBELL, DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE DR J McCLURE CBE, FORMER HEAD TEACHER OF ST GEORGE’S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OFFICE STAFF DIRECTOR OF JUDICIAL STUDIES SHERIFF T. WELSH QC DEPUTY DIRECTOR SHERIFF A G D THORNTON (UNTIL JUNE 2011) SHERIFF A J M DUFF (FROM AUGUST 2011) HEAD OF EDUCATION MS J HENDERSON (FROM SEPTEMBER 2011) HEAD OF JUDICIAL STUDIES MS A FISHER SECRETARIAT LEGAL ASSISTANTS MISS A BAREKAT (UNTIL JULY 2011) MISS E JOHNSTON (UNTIL JULY 2011) MR S BALMER MR O TIDMAN (UNTIL JANUARY 2012) MISS D BOVINGDON (FROM AUGUST 2011) ADMINISTRATION MANAGER MRS L MCINTOSH (FROM JULY 2011) LAY JUSTICE CONSULTANT MRS G MAWDSLEY PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO THE MS A SHIELDS (UNTIL JUNE 2011) DIRECTOR MS J KELLY (FROM JANUARY 2012) CLERK/TYPIST MS H STEVENSON PORTER/MESSENGER MR M ORTON (UNTIL JULY 2011) CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 INDRODUCTION 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Salaries
    MINISTRY0B OF JUSTICE JUDICIAL1B SALARIES FROM 1 APRIL 2013 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. 01/04/11 01/04/12 01/04/13 Group 1 239,845 239,845 242,243 Lord Chief Justice Group 1.1 214,165 214,165 216,307 Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Lord President of the Court of Session Master of the Rolls President of the Supreme Court Group 2 206,857 206,857 208,926 Chancellor of the High Court Deputy President of the Supreme Court Justices of the Supreme Court Lord Justice Clerk President of the Family Division President of the Queen’s Bench Division Senior President of Tribunals (Transitional pay) (201,613) (203,643) (207,730) Group3B 3 196,707 196,707 198,674 Inner House Judges of the Court of Session Lords Justices of Appeal Lords Justices of Appeal (N I) Group4B 4 172,753 172,753 174,481 High Court Judges [Note A] Outer House Judges of the Court of Session Puisne Judges (N I) Vice-Chancellor of the County Palatine of Lancaster Former Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator, Asylum 146,668 146,668 148,135 Support Tribunal (now judge of the First-tier Tribunal, Social Entitlement Chamber, and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal) Group 5 138,548 138,548 139,933 Chairman, Scottish Land Court President of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal [Note L] Chief Social Security Commissioner (N I) 1 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Body on Senior Salaries Cm 8026
    Review Body on Senior Salaries Review Body on Senior Salaries – REPORT No. 77 2011 REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, telephone, fax and email TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/general enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 Email: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/general enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other accredited agents Cm 8026 £20.50 Customers can also order publications from: .. TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 RBSS_2011_cover.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2011 Cm 8026 £20.50 RBSS_2011.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government­ licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants First
    PP66/08 J o in t C o m m it t ee on th e E m o lu m en t s of C er t a in P u blic Ser v a n t s F ir st R epo r t fo r th e Se ssio n 2007-2008 FIRST REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE EMOLUMENTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVANTS 2007/2008 Constituted 2nd and 30th March 1965 as a Standing Joint Committee to examine the amount of expenses paid to Members and the salaries of Senior Government Officials and Crown Officers. The Keys representatives are the members of the Consultative Committee of the House. By its First Report 1992/ 93 the terms of reference were revised as follows - (i) to consider and report to the Council and Keys on - (a) the emoluments of H E Lieutenant Governor, their Honours the First and Second Deemsters and the Judge of Appeal, H M Attorney General, the High Bailiff, the Deputy High Bailiff and the Clerk of Tynwald; (b) the Tynwald Membership Pension Scheme; and (c) in addition to its consultative functions set out in paragraph (i) and as it thinks fit, the emoluments of Members of Tynwald; (ii) to carry out its consultative functions under section 6(3) of the Payments of Members’ Expenses Act 1989, as the body designated by the Payment Of Members’ Expenses (Designation of Consultative Body) Order 1989. The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald are those conferred by sections 3 and 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, sections 1 to 4 of the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973 and sections 2 to 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Michaelmas 2012
    The Middle Templar The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple Issue 52 Michaelmas 2012 Middle Temple Officers 2012 Introduction Treasurer The Rt Hon The Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony After a year in post as Under Treasurer, it strikes me that two of the key qualities that Deputy Treasurer characterise Middle Temple are its open- Christopher Symons QC mindedness and its adaptability. This issue of The Middle Templar demonstrates these Deputy Treasurer Elect qualities in abundance: in 2012, the Library The Rt Hon The Lord Judge, hosted a Victorian banquet; Hall became a Lord Chief Justice theatre in the round; and Fountain Court was transformed into a Belgian Cycling Lent Reader Paradise. Like other ancient organisations – and indeed the profession Marilynne Morgan CB we represent – we will survive and thrive if we are able to adapt to face new challenges, and we have certainly shown this year that we Autumn Reader can metamorphose with the requirements of the day. Michael Crystal QC The Inn's willingness to adapt has shown itself of late not only by the Director of transformation of its physical space, but also by its ability to be self- Middle Temple Advocacy critical and open to new ways of thinking. The current review of our Derek Wood CBE QC governance, with its proposals to sharpen our focus and put greater emphasis on our core purposes, effective decision-making and Master of the Archive planning for the future, provides a good example of this. Michael Ashe QC Another prompt for serious reflection has been the sweeping review Masters of the Garden of legal education and training, currently being carried out by the legal regulators of England and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Guardian, 17 June 1999 – John Hutton, the health minister, was quoted as saying there should be ‘radical improvements in adoption services. We will not hesitate to take the necessary action in the future to ensure that looked-after children do not become the innocent victims of misplaced theory or ideology’. And a prospective adopter wrote to the Evening Standard, 4 September 2003: ‘No first-time natural parent on this planet is, or will ever be, examined and intrusively checked on their parenting capability, as adopters are.’ 2. Jenny Keating, ‘Struggle for Identity: Issues Underlying the Enactment of the 1926 Adoption of Children Act’, University of Sussex Journal of Contemporary History, issue 3 (2001), http://www.sussex.ac.uk/history/documents/3._ keating_struggle_for_identity.pdf. 3. They could apply to see their original birth certificate when they reached the age of majority but a court order was necessary. During this period very few legally adopted children would have reached the age of majority except for a few whose de facto adoptions were made official by the 1926 Adoption Act. 4. See Chapter 6. 5. Murray Ryburn, ‘Secrecy and Openness in Adoption: An Historical Perspective’, Social Policy and Administration, vol. 29, no. 2 (June 1995), pp. 151–68. 6. Ibid., op. cit., p. 166. 7. See Erica Haimes and Noel Timms, ‘Access to Birth Records and Counselling of Adopted Persons Under Section 26 of the Children Act, 1975’, Final Report to the DHSS (University of Newcastle upon Tyne, May 1983); John P. Triseliotis, ‘Obtaining Birth Certificates’, in Philip Bean (ed.), Adoption: Essays in Social Policy, Law and Sociology (London: Tavistock Publications, 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Future Challenges of a Different Kind
    SUMMER 2020 Future challenges of a different kind NATIONAL CRIMEBEAT AWARDS 2020 www Lady Shrieval .antoniapugh-thom High Ant Haute dr ess Sheriffs onia for Coutur Pugh- as.co.uk eW omensw Thomas 020 ear 7731 7582 Photo courtesy of Harald Altmaier Volume 39 Issue 1 Summer 2020 The High Sheriffs’ Association of England and Wales President J R Avery Esq DL 12 15 Officers and Council 2020 OFFICERS Chairman The Hon H J H Tollemache Email [email protected] Honorary Secretary 34 38 J H A Williams Esq MBE Gatefield, Green Tye, Much Hadham Hertfordshire SG10 6JJ Tel 01279 842225 Email [email protected] Honorary Treasurer N R Savory Esq DL Thorpland Hall, Fakenham Norfolk NR21 0HD Tel 01328 862392 Email [email protected] COUNCIL Canon S E A Bowie DL T H Birch Reynardson Esq D C F Jones Esq DL J A T Lee Esq OBE DL Mrs V A Lloyd DL Mrs A J Parker JP DL Dr R Shah MBE JP DL Lt Col A S Tuggey CBE DL W A A Wells Esq TD (Hon Editor of The High Sheriff ) S J Young Esq MC JP DL The High Sheriff is published twice a year by Hall-McCartney Ltd for the High Sheriffs’ Association of England and Wales Hon Editor Andrew Wells Email [email protected] ISSN 1477-8548 ©2020 The High Sheriffs’ Association of England and Wales 4 From the Editor 12 General Election 44 Association regalia The Association is not as a body responsible for the opinions expressed and publications in The High Sheriff unless it is stated The ‘Red Mass’ that an article or a letter officially Diary 15 represents the Council’s views.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senior Presiding Judge Has Published Guidance to the Judiciary
    THE RT HON LADY JUSTICE MACUR Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme Dispute NOTE FROM THE SENIOR PRESIDING JUDGE 1. This guidance is issued in respect of publicly funded defence cases where the representation order was granted on or after 1 April 2018. 2. This guidance only applies to cases sent to the Crown Court during the period of the dispute between the legal profession and the Lord Chancellor. It has no wider application. 3. The aim is to ensure uniformity of approach by all judges sitting at the Crown Court and to assist defendants who appear in the Crown Court unrepresented by either counsel or solicitors. 4. There must be no suggestion that the judiciary are anything other than neutral in this dispute between the profession and the government. This guidance seeks only to address practical issues in the management of cases in the Crown Court. 5. The work of the court must continue to be listed appropriately with the expectation that those instructed to attend will do so and fulfil their commitments to their clients and the court. Any application to vacate or adjourn a case should be decided on its merits and in the interests of justice. It is important to keep an accurate factual record of the impact on the working of the court of any action, including the name and details of any cases affected. Over Arching Principles 6. The following principles apply and must govern practical steps taken by the court: Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Telephone 020 79477211 Email [email protected] Website www.judiciary.gov.uk (1) The duty of the judge is to secure a fair trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Salaries from 1 April 2012
    Judicial salaries from 1 April 2012 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. 01/04/10 01/04/11 01/04/12 Group 1 239,845 239,845 239,845 Lord Chief Justice Group 1.1 214,165 214,165 214,165 Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Lord President of the Court of Session Master of the Rolls President of the Supreme Court Group 2 206,857 206,857 206,857 Chancellor of the High Court Deputy President of the Supreme Court Justices of the Supreme Court Lord Justice Clerk President of the Family Division President of the Queen’s Bench Division Senior President of Tribunals (Transitional pay) (199,583) (201,613) (203,643) Group 3 196,707 196,707 196,707 Inner House Judges of the Court of Session Lords Justices of Appeal Lords Justices of Appeal (N I) Group 4 172,753 172,753 172,753 High Court Judges [Note A] Outer House Judges of the Court of Session Puisne Judges (N I) Vice-Chancellor of the County Palatine of Lancaster Former Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator, Asylum 146,668 146,668 146,668 Support Tribunal (now judge of the First-tier Tribunal, Social Entitlement Chamber, and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal) Group 5 138,548 138,548 138,548 Chairman, Scottish Land Court Chief Social Security Commissioner (N I) Circuit Judges at the Central Criminal Court in London (Old Bailey Judges) Vice President of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) President of the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber; Social Entitlement Chamber; General Regulatory Chamber; and Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Former Deputy President, Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Former President, Care Standards Tribunal (now judge of the First-tier Tribunal, Health, Education and Social Care Chamber, and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal) 1 Group Salaries w.e.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 73 CM 7804
    Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 73 Thirty-Second Report on Senior Salaries 2010 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Cm 7804 £19.15 Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 73 Thirty-Second Report on Senior Salaries 2010 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2010 Cm 7804 £19.15 © Crown Copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please contact the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 9780101780421 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002352882 03/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Foreword Review Body on Senior Salaries The Review Body on Top Salaries (TSRB) was appointed in May 1971 and renamed the Review Body on Senior Salaries (SSRB) in July 1993, with revised terms of reference. The terms of reference were revised again in 1998 as a consequence of the Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review, in 2001 to allow the devolved bodies direct access to the Review Body’s advice and in 2007 to add certain NHS managers to the remit.
    [Show full text]