History of Land Ownership in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Land Ownership in the United States COVER STORY From Metes and Bounds to Grids or a CliffsNotes™ History of Land Ownership in the United States by Richard Norejko, CMS The statements made or opinions expressed by authors in Fair & Equitable do not necessarily represent a policy position of the International Association of Assessing Officers. rivate land ownership in the United States is essentially Valley, to the woodland villages of the Northeast. In Central a reflection of American history. The tremendous and South America, they constructed even more complex Pwillingness of the colonists, living in a new world, to societies. The Aztecs of Mexico and the Inca of Peru created experiment with new ideas and new rules is what has offered aristocracies and emperors. The Aztec capital of Tenochtitlán them the opportunity to own a piece of real estate—a piece (modern-day Mexico City), with a population of 200,000 of America. Americans have always shown a kind of forward- people, may have actually been the largest city in the world looking-ness, a special welcome to the new and the untried. on October 12, 1492. We don’t feel constrained by the habits of other people or It was inevitable that the Western Hemisphere would be of other times. We truly believe that as a nation we are like “discovered” by a civilization from the East. The events lead- nothing else the world has ever seen before. ing up to Columbus’s “discovery” actually began when the How did we get to this point? What happened to create this Roman Empire dumped the old Roman gods in favor of situation? Who has been influential in the process? How did Christianity. Along with the eventual collapse of the Roman property descriptions develop from the metes-and-bounds Empire arose a new religion, Islam, which overran the old system of colonial times to today’s grid system? This article Roman provinces of Asia Minor and Northern Africa, all the offers a whirlwind tour of how land ownership developed in way to the borders of modern-day France. the United States of America. In 1096, the chief of Europe’s Christian church, Pope Ur- ban II, called for a mighty effort to recover the sacred city of East Meets West Jerusalem, where Christianity was born, from the hands of Americans have a deep-seated passion for freedom, a free- Islam. The Pope’s call became a military crusade. Thousands dom present in American life and American experience of Europeans who had never strayed more than a few miles since the first moment we began to think of ourselves as from the place of their birth now had to recapture a city in something different from Europe. That moment could be a very distant land. said to have occurred when, in 1492, a Genoese entrepre- neur and navigator named Christopher Columbus caught These Holy Crusades taught Europeans two important his first glimpse of the island shores of what was, for him at lessons: first, how to organize and support large-scale expedi- least, a New World. At this time, however, the Americas were tions and explorations of previously unknown territory, and already settled. second, how to enrich themselves from trade and cultural exchange with Palestine and the Islamic world. For thousands of years, Indians had spread throughout the Western Hemisphere, and by the year 1500, it has been esti- The lure of trade encouraged Europeans and European mated that the North American population alone may have governments to undertake an ambitious series of explora- been 10–15 million. These Native Americans probably spoke tions aimed at opening new markets. In 1271 the Venetian more than 300 different languages in at least 12 entirely dif- Marco Polo set off on a three-year journey to the very heart ferent language systems or language stems. They also had of the Chinese Empire. Polo spent 17 years in China, and developed more than 600 autonomous social systems that when he returned to Europe in 1295, he published a rollick- were radically different from each other, from the pueblos ing account of his adventures and the fortunes that could of the Southwest, to the fortified towns of the Mississippi be made in trade with the Far East. Fair & Equitable • January 2009 3 Cover Story The Europeans who profited the most India. Columbus and his men were not from the new world of trade opened up glad to discover the Americas. by the Crusades were the Italian city-states Explorers, supported by various Euro- and the port cities of Southern Europe. pean governments, tried their very best Western Europeans were also determined to find a water route around or through not to miss the opportunity for wealth in America. Ferdinand Magellan sailed the East. Since the Italian city-states con- southward around South America into trolled the Mediterranean routes, Western the Pacific Ocean. Amerigo Vespucci Europeans wanted to find another route and Martin Frobisher probed northward to Marco Polo’s China. The Portuguese looking for a northwest passage through underwrote expeditions that proved it was North America. When no such path ap- possible to sail south around the coast of peared, these European countries turned West Africa into the Indian Ocean. The their attention elsewhere. Spanish were right behind the Portuguese in breaking out into the Atlantic. It was individual freebooters who took a second look at America, not as an ob- In 1492, a navigator from the Italian stacle to the Far East, but as a source of trading emporium of Genoa named wealth. In 1519 Hernando Cortés spent Christopher Columbus persuaded the two years in Central America pillaging, King and Queen of Spain to finance and Portrait of Christophorus Columbus, created massacring, and finally capturing several support an expedition of sailing, not east between 1890 and 1940. (Source: Library of kings’-ransom-worth of gold and silver. In into the Mediterranean Sea and then Congress Prints and Photographs Division) 1532, Francisco Pizarro mounted a similar overland to the Near and Far East, or even campaign against the Inca of Peru. He too India. Instead, they were two enormous south around Africa, but due west into rampaged and pillaged the Inca Empire, continents stretching from north to the Atlantic, so that Spain could arrive seizing up to $65 million in Inca treasure. south like a great barrier across the At- directly at China’s back door. Other Spanish adventures swarmed over lantic. And a barrier they were, because Central America and the North American the discovery of these continents was Christopher Columbus Southeast looking for treasure to repeat met with disappointment rather than joy. Columbus set sail from Spain in August the examples of Cortés and Pizarro. 1492 and in October landed in what he They constituted a major obstacle to the thought were islands off the coast of real goal, which was reaching China and The wealth generated by extraction of riches from the Americas made Spain a major political force in Europe through- out the 1600s. But Spain managed its American profits poorly and was unable to match the energy of France’s rise to European dominance. The French pro- ceeded to copy the Spanish program by mounting extraction incursions of their own in North America. The French found in abundance something almost as valuable as gold, fur—beaver, fox, lynx—to extract and bring to Europe. Like Spain, France used its exploration and opening of North America for extraction rather than settle- ment. There was one more European sea power that had not been heard from, and that was England. America Is Settled Of all the European nations facing the At- lantic Ocean, none would ordinarily have seemed to have greater advantages for entering the race for North American ex- ploration than England—better than the Christopher Columbus among Indians, lithograph created between 1850 and 1900. (Source Spanish, better than the French, better Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division) 4 Fair & Equitable • January 2009 the 41st parallel (Long Island Sound). genocide, and an epidemic of diseases Another English-chartered company, the like smallpox and measles that proved Massachusetts Bay Company, organized deadly to the natives in both Americas, in 1628, was granted rights to the area be- the population plummeted. For instance, tween the Charles and Merrimack rivers in Massachusetts Bay, smallpox wiped and westward to the Pacific Ocean. out 90 percent of the Native American However, the settlers of the two colo- population. By the time of the American nies could not have been more different. Revolution it is estimated that only 1 mil- The passengers headed to Virginia were lion Native Americans remained. usually single men whose average age was 20, most of whom were going as servant The Settlers Define Land labor. The settlers in Massachusetts were Ownership usually complete households with the av- Another problem was the lack of prop- erage age of the heads of households be- erty corners, fences, and boundaries in ing 36. In other words, those bound for pre-Columbus North America. While Virginia were footloose and poor, while the inhabiting tribes had vastly differ- those headed for New England were a ent cultures, they did have one thing in community. As one Englishman later common: no permanent occupational put it, America was a place where one boundary markers or written legal instru- could go to “live bravely,” to live without ments for claiming ownership. In Native restraint in a new unchartered land. American culture, land was common property for everyone. “What is this you The facts that the New World had al- call property?” Massasoit, a leader of the Elizabeth I, Queen of England, 1533-1603, ready been discovered centuries before copyright 1904 by G.
Recommended publications
  • Beginning Land Platting J
    Beginning Land Platting J. Mark Lowe, CG, FUGA [email protected] All rights reserved © 2017 Making a tract map may help a researcher identify a community, including neighbors, ferries, mills, cemeteries, historic houses, and many other landmarks. Although most individual researchers might not tackle the platting of a whole community, we are more likely to plat a tract of ancestor’s land and include his surrounding neighbors. In fact, it might be necessary to plat a community in order to determine where an ancestor’s land might be located or from where he might have migrated. By locating the land of an ancestor, we might gain an understanding of their lives and be able to become more involved with their community activities. Land is described in the terms of the “metes” and “bounds” of the tract. Metes are the natural or man-made features of the land that serves at the points along the boundary lines (a white oak, Jackson’s corner, Washington Road, a stake) and the boundary lines or bounds connect these points or metes. Bounds are generally given in courses (compass direction) and distance (length of lines between point) as well as by the landmarks or adjoining property owners. With the aid of a few inexpensive tools, researchers can construct their own plats of land tracts as described in deeds, wills, court records or land grants. TERM ENGLISH LAND MEASURE Acre 43560 square feet 160 square rods Chain 66 feet, 22 yards 100 links or 4 rods Furlong 660 feet, 220 yards 10 chains Link 7.92 inches 25 links=1 rod Mile 5280 feet 80 chains,
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Cadastral Geographic Information System (GIS) Handbook
    The Mapping & Cadastral Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Handbook National Wildlife Refuge System Division of Realty Cadastral Data Working Group August 2018 Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is the purpose of The Mapping and Cadastral Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Handbook? .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 What are the objectives of this handbook? ............................................................ 5 1.3 What is the scope of the handbook? ...................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 - Authority and History .................................................................................... 6 2.1 What are the authorities for this chapter? .............................................................. 6 2.2 What is the history of the FWS Cartography and Cadastral GIS program? ........... 6 Chapter 3 – Organization, Administration, Requirements ............................................... 9 3.1 What is the organization and administration of the Service cartographers? .......... 9 3.2 What are the duties of the Chief Cartographer and Regional Realty Cartographers? ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2.A Chief Cartographer .......................................................................................... 9 3.2.B Regional Realty
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Way Manual
    Right of Way Manual Office of Land Management Updated 07/26/2018 General Index 100 Pre-Acquisition 200 Appraisals 300 Acquisition 400 Relocation Assistance Program 500 Property Management 800 Special Procedures Table of Contents 100 Pre-Acquisition ...................................................................................................................................1 101 Initial Program Development Process ........................................................................................................1 101.1 Background .........................................................................................................................................1 101.2 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................1 101.3 Procedures ..........................................................................................................................................1 102 Project Numbers and Right of Way State Project Numbers .......................................................................3 102.1 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................3 102.2 Procedure ...........................................................................................................................................3 103 Base Maps...................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Disputes
    BOUNDARY DISPUTES I. FINDING THE SOLUTION TO UNRESOLVED BOUNDARIES. II. HANDLING RIGHT OF WAY PROBLEMS Mark S. Shipman, Esq. Shipman, Sosensky, Randich & Marks, LLC 135 South Road Farmington, CT 06032 Tel. (860) 606-1700 Fax (860) 606-1770 email: [email protected] I. FINDING THE SOLUTION TO UNRESOVED BOUNDARIES Generally. Robert Frost once said that “good fences do good neighbors make”. It is most often true. However, when the fence purports to describe a boundary and it’s in the wrong place, things are often not so neighborly. Fences are among a variety of ways that have been used to delineate the division between adjoining properties. Sometimes they are used as the boundary line and described as such. Other times they are placed subsequently to the division of property, to serve as a visual, if not legal divider. There are other ways to define the confines of particular properties. Boundaries are often mapped. They are described by metes and bounds. They are fixed by reference to markers or points. All of these methods are believed to be effective. Many times they conflict. A boundary is defined as: “Every separation, natural or artificial, which marks the confines or line of division of two contiguous properties. Limits or marks of enclosures if possession be without title, or the boundaries or limits stated in title deed if possession be under a title.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. Boundaries may be natural, such as rocks, trees and rivers. They can be artificial, such as iron pins, merestones, monuments or fences. Today, it is the norm for purchasers and lenders to require surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Legal Descriptions ‐ NYSAPLS Conf January 2018
    Writing Legal Descriptions ‐ NYSAPLS Conf January 2018 Legal Descriptions Scott Reeser, P.L.S. NYSAPLS 2018 Conference INTRODUCTION: • Over 25 years experience in the surveying profession • Graduate of Penn State survey program • Licensed in Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and Colorado • Have worked for small firms and larger sized firms WARNING: This presentation is not intended to be a lecture. My intent is to present the attendees with information I have gathered thru various sources and stimulate discussion on these topics. Participation from the attendees is essential to the success of the session. Everyone in attendance is asked to provide input and ask questions. By gathering input from those present, we may all learn something by the end of the day. 1 Writing Legal Descriptions ‐ NYSAPLS Conf January 2018 Objectives of this Webinar: – Define the purpose of legal descriptions – List commonly used types of legal descriptions – Review the parts of legal descriptions Objectives of this Webinar: – Identify common terminology used in legal descriptions – Identify common mistakes made in the preparation of legal descriptions – Practice writing legal descriptions WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION? Per Black’s Law Dictionary: “Legal Description. A formal description of real property, including a description of any part subject to an easement or reservation, complete enough that a particular piece of land can be located and identified. The description can be made by reference to a government survey, metes and bounds, or lot numbers of a recorded plat. ‐ Also termed land description.” 2 Writing Legal Descriptions ‐ NYSAPLS Conf January 2018 Types of Legal Descriptions: – Metes and Bounds – Reference to other Documents – Strip or baseline – Bounded by – Public Lands / Section Reference Types of Legal Descriptions: Metes & Bounds: • Provides a description of the area’s perimeter using geometry • Metes refers to bearings or angles and distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant's Guide to Boundary Adjustments, Certificates of Compliance and Final Maps
    Applicant’s Guide to Boundary Adjustments, Certificates of Compliance and Final Maps 1. Boundary Adjustment Purpose: To adjust the legal boundaries between two to four legally created parcels. A Boundary Adjustment may not create any new lots, nor may it include any lot not legally created. Application: A Boundary Adjustment Plat must be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer (licensed prior to 1982 with license number lower than 33965) that is able to practice surveying, or a Licensed Land Surveyor and submitted to the Development Services Center with the applicable Certificates of Compliance (COC) or Final Map and fees. Fee: See current fee schedule. 2. Certificate of Compliance Purpose: To establish a particular lot as a legal building site. It does not mean that the lot may necessarily be built upon since it may lack certain amenities, however it does establish a legal lot. A Certificate of Compliance or Parcel/Final Map is required for each lot affected by a Boundary Adjustment. Application: The applicant must submit the completed application to the Development Services Center with the Boundary Adjustment and all applicable fees. Fee: See current fee schedule. 3. Parcel Map and Final Map Purpose: To establish legal lots. This process of establishing lots is usually selected when the Boundary Adjustment and associated easements and encumbrances are completed or right-of- way dedication is proposed. Application: The applicant must provide a complete Parcel Map or Final Map submittal. Fee: See current fee schedule. Boundary Adjustment
    [Show full text]
  • BOUNDARY LAW and LANDOWNER DISPUTES in TEXAS Boundary Law and Landowner Disputes
    BOUNDARY LAW AND LANDOWNER DISPUTES IN TEXAS Boundary Law and Landowner Disputes TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TRESPASS TO TRY TITLE 1 A. History, Purpose And Jurisdiction 1 B. Parties And Procedure 3 1. Parties. 3 2. Pleadings 3 3. Demand for Abstract. 5 II. PARTITION 5 A. Jurisdiction and Parties 5 B. Procedure 5 III. SUIT TO REMOVE CLOUD FROM TITLE OR QUIETING TITLE 7 A. History, Purpose and Jurisdiction 7 B. Evidence in Land Suits 8 C. Common Source 9 D. Adverse Possession 9 E. Prior Possession 12 F. Damages - Good Faith Improvements 13 G. Documentary Evidence 13 IV. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 14 A. Sufficiency of Description 14 B. Priority of Calls 16 V. LITIGATING BOUNDARY DISPUTES 17 A. E.H. Brainard, II, etal. vs. The State of Texas, 12 S.W.3d 6) (Tex. 1999) 17 B. Adverse Possession ~ Hostile claim 17 C. Adverse Possession - Character of Use 17 D. Terrill v. Tuckness, 985 S.W.2d 97 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, n.w.h.) 17 E. Garza v. Maddux, 988 S.W.2d 280 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1999, n.w.h.) 19 F. John G. and Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. Dewhurst, 994 S. W.2d 285 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, n.w.h.) 19 G. Wall v. Carrell, 894 S.W.2d 788 (Tex.App.BTyler 1995, writ denied) 19 H. Mohnke v. Greenwood, 915 S.W.2d 585 (Tex.App. - Hou[14th Dist.] 1996, n.w.h.) 20 I. McAllister v. Samuels, 857 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App. -Houston [14th] 1993, n.w.h.) 21 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • PTAX 1-M, Introduction to Mapping for Assessors
    1-M, Introduction to Mapping for Assessors # 001-805 68 PTAX 1-M Rev 02/2021 1 Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois. web only, one copy 2 Table of Contents Glossary ............................................................................................................ Page 5 Where to Get Assistance ................................................................................... Page 10 Unit 1: Basic Types and Uses of Maps ............................................................. Page 13 Unit 2: Measurements and Math for Mapping .................................................. Page 33 Unit 3: The US Rectangular Land Survey ........................................................ Page 49 Unit 4: Legal Descriptions ................................................................................ Page 63 Blank Practice Pages ...................................................................................... Page 94 Unit 5: Metes and Bounds Legal Descriptions .................................................. Page 97 Unit 6: Principles for Assigning Property Index Numbers ................................. Page 131 Unit 7: GIS and Mapping .................................................................................. Page 151 Exam Preparation.............................................................................................. Page 160 Answer Key ....................................................................................................... Page 161 3 4 Glossary Acre – A unit of land area in England
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Land Measurements Review
    3.0 Land Measurements Review (Chpt 4 in Husch, et al.) Knowledge critical to the forest scientist is the way land subdivision is carried out in any particular region in which they work Knowledge of the basic elements of surveying is also crucial to practitioners of forestry science To these ends, the forest scientist should be adept at pacing, chaining, running compass traverses, and various methods of estimating land area 3.1 Land Subdivision (in the U.S.) Methods Metes and Bounds The original 13 colonies of the United States of America were subdivided and passed into private ownership using the so called “metes and bounds” method, sometimes jokingly referred to as “leaps and bounds.” The term mete implies and act of metering, measuring, and assigning by measure, and bounds refers to property boundaries or other limits or constraints to the extent of an ownership. In some instances, however, especially older metes and bounds surveys consist entirely of descriptions without measurements, such as in the following example: “starting at the pine tree blazed on its east side, thence along a hedgerow to a granite boulder on the bank of the Wampum River, thence along the river to the intersection of Cherokee Creek …” U.S. Public Land Survey Most of the U.S. west of the Mississippi River and north of the Ohio River, including Alabama, Mississippi, and portions of Florida has been subdivided in accordance with the US Public Land Survey (Exhibit 5). The first law governing public land surveys was passed by Congress in 1785. The “Northwest Territory” (later becoming the state of Ohio) was chosen as the experimental area for the development of this rectangular system The original intent was to establish townships exactly 6 miles square, followed by subdivision into 36 sections of exactly 1 square mile each.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Rectangular Surveys
    GLO History, Records and other Resources for Indian Lands Kenneth D. Roy BLM Indian Lands Surveyor (BILS) Eastern States Cadastral Survey BIA Midwest Region 5600 West American Boulevard Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 (612) 725-4580 [email protected] Early Surveying in America ►Metes and Bounds . A system of describing land boundaries was adopted from the archaic “Rural Land Description”. This would later develop into the metes-and-bounds (metes meaning measurement or metering, bounds referring to identifiable boundaries) method. Natural landmarks can change over time. Water boundaries shift and trees die and decay. Early Surveying in America ►Metes and Bounds . "…after turning around in another direction, and by a sloping straight line to a certain heap of stone which is by pacing, just 18 rods and about one half a rod more from the stump of the big hemlock tree where Philo Blake killed the bear…“ . This system is perpetuated in the 13 original colony States and much of the land East of the Mississippi and South of the Ohio River. Metes and Bounds Grant The United States ►After the end of the Revolutionary War and the subsequent Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, the United States boundaries were established in a treaty negotiated with England, Spain, and France. It was signed September 3, 1783. All of the land North of Spanish Florida, East of the Mississippi River, and South of the Great Lakes The United States The United States ► The Revolutionary War left the United States in dire need of revenue for reparations as well as payment to the soldiers in the Continental Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchapter 13. Minimum Standards for Land Surveying
    TITLE 245 CHAPTER 15. LICENSURE AND PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS SUBCHAPTER 13. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAND SURVEYING 245:15-13-1. Purpose; scope; applicability In order to better serve the public in regulating the practice of land surveying in Oklahoma, these minimum standards of practice are established to achieve no less than minimum standard degrees of accuracy, completeness, and quality so as to assure adequate and defensible real property boundary locations. When more stringent survey standards than those set forth herein are required the survey shall comply with both those standards and with the Oklahoma Minimum Standards for the Practice of Land Surveying. Where the Professional Land Surveyor elects to follow or use a more thorough method of determining accuracy, it is not the intent of these standards to interfere. Land Surveyors failing to comply with or meet these minimum standards will be subject to disciplinary action by the Board. 245:15-13-2. Minimum Standards (a) Definitions: as used in these standards, the following terms shall have the following meanings where the context permits as provided in 59 O.S. 475.1 et seq. and Chapter 245:15-1-3 of the Rules of the Board. (b) Research and investigation. Every property boundary survey shall be made in accordance with the boundary description, as provided to or as created by the professional land surveyor, as nearly as is practicable. The professional land surveyor, prior to making a survey, shall acquire available necessary survey data, which may include record descriptions, deeds, maps, Certified Corner Records, government notes, subdivision plats, road records, and other available section and boundary line location data in the vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Subdivision Regulations (Platting)
    CHAPTER 12 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (PLATTING) SECTION 12.01. PURPOSE, SCOPE AND COMPLIANCE. Subd. 1. Purpose. All subdivisions of land hereafter submitted for approval shall comply in all respects with the regulations set forth herein. It is the purpose of these regulations to: (1) Encourage well-planned, efficient, and attractive developments by establishing adequate standards for design and construction; (2) Provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the City's residents and property owners, by requiring properly designed and coordinated streets and adequate sewage, water, and drainage facilities; (3) Secure the rights of the public with respect to public lands and waters; (4) Serve as a tool to carry out the objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan; (5) Provide for a means to provide adequate recreational areas, school sites, and other public facilities; (6) To assure equitable handling of all subdivision plats by providing uniform procedures. Subd. 2. Scope. This Chapter shall apply to the subdivision or re-subdivision of any parcel of land as well as conveyance, registered land survey, or other means within the City as well as any property located within a two mile radius in the Township of Becker as established with extra-territorial rights. The authority to enforce these regulations to the two mile radius surrounding the City comes from Minnesota Statute 462.358. Subd. 3. Compliance. After the adoption of this Chapter, no lot in a subdivision shall be sold and no permit shall be issued to alter or erect any building upon land in a subdivision unless a subdivision plat has been approved and recorded and until the improvements required by the Council relative to the subdivision have been constructed or arranged for as provided herein.
    [Show full text]