Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Thursday Volume 542 22 March 2012 No. 284 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 22 March 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 907 22 MARCH 2012 908 Karen Lumley: Will the Minister congratulate House of Commons Worcestershire county council, which has set aside £8.5 million in these difficult times to secure superfast broadband? In Redditch we have a £300,000 project to Thursday 22 March 2012 enable residents to stay at home and work instead of travelling into cities. What can the Government do in The House met at half-past Ten o’clock these times to help local authorities further? Mr Vaizey: We continue to invest a substantial amount PRAYERS in broadband roll-out, and I am happy to join my hon. Friend in congratulating Worcestershire county council on investing alongside the Government. It is a great [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] testament to the scheme that we have put in place that we have secured private funding and local government funding alongside central Government funding. Oral Answers to Questions Caroline Nokes: What progress has been made to overcome the issues of state aid in unlocking the rural broadband fund, which will help in counties such as Hampshire? CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT Mr Vaizey: We have applied for a UK-wide scheme The Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media for state aid approval. We believe that we are close to and Sport was asked— approval, and we continue to work closely with the European Commission on the issue. Superfast Broadband Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab): The cumbersome and expensive Broadband Delivery UK process appears 1. Julian Smith (Skipton and Ripon) (Con): What almost to have eliminated competition, which ought to progress he has made on his plans to extend superfast have had a very important role in it. Ministers made a broadband to rural areas. [101297] big strategic error in supporting superfast broadband at county level, rather than regionally. Does the Minister 10. Karen Lumley (Redditch) (Con): What progress recognise that it will be a scandal if the outcome of the he has made on his plans to extend superfast broadband process is that, in the end, all the money is just handed to rural areas. [101307] over to BT? 13. Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North) Mr Vaizey: I am surprised that the right hon. Gentleman, (Con): What progress he has made on his plans to as a former telecoms Minister, does not understand extend superfast broadband to rural areas. [101312] that, if we had had a national or a regional scheme, competition would have been even harder to secure. As The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, it is, three major competitors remain in play in terms of Olympics, Media and Sport (Mr Edward Vaizey): May I broadband roll-out. apologise for the Secretary of State’s absence from questions today and thank you, Mr Speaker, for giving Tony Lloyd (Manchester Central) (Lab): How, in him leave of absence? The whole House will be aware of rolling out broadband, will we ensure that the people the happy reasons for that absence. who undertake installation in different regions—rural We anticipate that the broadband delivery framework areas as well as urban—do not simply move from contract will be signed with suppliers in mid-April, and London and then take their skills back to London, and we expect the first three projects to enter procurement that a skill repository is left among the work force using the framework immediately after. We have set a where broadband is installed? target for all broadband procurement to be completed by the end of 2012, so that delivery can be completed by Mr Vaizey: I cannot guarantee that the engineers who 2015. lay broadband will stay in the areas in which they work, but the key point about broadband roll-out is to ensure Julian Smith: I thank the Minister for that answer. that all parts of the country benefit from the infrastructure Rural north Yorkshire is already benefiting from the so that we can base companies with high skills all over Government’s investment in broadband, and after the country. yesterday’s Budget cities will, too, but at higher speeds. How do we avoid a continued digital divide between Helen Goodman (Bishop Auckland) (Lab): Yesterday rural and urban areas, but at higher speeds? the Chancellor of the Exchequer found extra money to extend superfast broadband to small cities, but, as the Mr Vaizey: My hon. Friend has been a doughty hon. Member for Skipton and Ripon (Julian Smith) champion of his part of the world in securing superfast said, the real digital divide today is between those with broadband. All the country will benefit from superfast broadband and those without. Peter Cochrane, former broadband, but it is quite right that we continue to chief technical officer at BT, giving evidence in the invest in higher speeds, particularly for cities, to maintain other place, described access as “a fundamental human our global competitiveness. right”. Two million people, mainly in rural areas, are 909 Oral Answers22 MARCH 2012 Oral Answers 910 still without broadband, and Labour pledged to guarantee contact, if any, does the Minister have with the Scottish 2 megabits to almost every household by 2012, but this Government about how services are being developed Government will not achieve that until after 2015. Why north of the border? are Ministers so unfair in their treatment of rural Britain? Mr Vaizey: I have regular contact with the Scottish Government, who have welcomed the funding and are Mr Vaizey: I certainly reject the accusation that we putting in their own funding to support broadband have been unfair on rural Britain, and my glass, unlike roll-out in Scotland. the hon. Lady’s, is half full not half empty. I look forward to going on a tour with her to Belfast, Cardiff, Jake Berry (Rossendale and Darwen) (Con): It was Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester and so on and telling once said that the entire empire hung by Lancashire’s people that they are getting unfair treatment from the thread. Will the Minister join me in congratulating Government because we are investing in their broadband Lancashire county council on prioritising superfast networks. broadband? The entire county now hangs from its fibre optic cable. Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (LD): Rural Britain, in the shape of the small town of Bradford on Avon in Mr Vaizey: I am happy to join my hon. Friend in my constituency, welcomed the news this week that it is congratulating Lancashire on its superfast broadband. to have superfast broadband with the conversion of its It is a very innovative and go-ahead authority, which exchange. [Interruption.] In the Budget yesterday the has also been particularly pioneering in libraries. Government announced pilots, including one in Wiltshire, for rural growth networks to address the barriers to economic recovery. Will funding from those networks Press Complaints Commission be available to increase the roll-out of superfast broadband in rural areas? 3. Jim Sheridan (Paisley and Renfrewshire North) (Lab): What assessment he has made of the potential Mr Vaizey: I did not hear the entire question because effects on local newspapers of the closure of the Press of the continued carping from the Opposition at our Complaints Commission. [101299] support for our major and smaller cities. I will happily work with the hon. Gentleman to ensure that all broadband The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, funding is used as effectively as possible in his area. Olympics, Media and Sport (Mr Edward Vaizey): The Leveson inquiry was established by the Government Superfast Broadband last July and will make recommendations to my Department about reform for the system of press regulation. The 2. Mr David Nuttall (Bury North) (Con): What closure of the Press Complaints Commission is a matter progress he has made in improving access to superfast for the industry, but the new structure will apply to all broadband. [101298] newspapers, local or national. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Jim Sheridan: My local press are watching with interest Olympics, Media and Sport (Mr Edward Vaizey): We to see what replaces the PCC. What measures are in have now approved the local broadband plans for Durham, place to defend or protect the general public when Warwickshire, Northumberland and Staffordshire project taking redress against, mainly, the national newspapers? areas, which means that 24 of the 45 plans received by Will the Minister share with the House how many the 29 February deadline have been approved; that is meetings, if any, his Department has had with national more than half. All submitted plans, including Greater newspaper editors or proprietors? Manchester’s, will be approved by the end of April 2012. Mr Vaizey: I do not have the details of meetings with We anticipate that the contract for the broadband national editors, but I am happy to share them with the delivery framework will be signed with suppliers in hon. Gentleman by way of a letter. The Press Complaints mid-April and expect the first three projects to enter Commission mediation procedures will continue during procurement using the framework immediately following the transit to a new arrangement. the contract’s being signed. We have set a target for all broadband procurements to be completed by the end Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab): I draw Members’ of 2012.
Recommended publications
  • A (Crumbling) Wall of Money Financial Bricolage, Derivatives And
    A (Crumbling) Wall of Money Financial Bricolage, Derivatives and Power by Nicholas Hildyard The Corner House, UK www.thecornerhouse.org.uk 8 October 2008 (Work in Progress) Contents Page Preface: Brief Encounters with Securitisation and Derivatives 1 Introduction 4 Creating a Wall of Money 6 Box: “Questions and Answers” 7 The Music Stops: Who’s Holding the (Toxic) Parcel? 9 Box : “Who Knew What and When . .?” 12 Bricolaging Their Way Out of the Crisis 13 Bricolaged Ancestry: The Faux Historicism of a Speculative Tool 15 Derivatives, Hedging and Speculation 18 Alphabetising the Derivatives: CDOs 19 Creating a Derivatives Market 23 Seven (Unstated) Uses for a Derivative 26 ▪ Permitting the Impermissible 27 ▪ Disguising Risk 28 ▪ Beating Basel 28 ▪ Avoiding Law Suits 30 ▪ Inflating Profits, Hiding Debt 30 ▪ Evading Maastricht 31 ▪ Circumventing Stock Market Rules 32 Bricolaging Institutions: Private Equity and Hedge Funds 34 Box: “You Know a Hedge Fund You See It” 35 Bricolaging a Shadow Banking System 37 Derivative Bricolage and “Financialisation” 39 Leveraged Buyouts 39 Mergers and Acquisitions 40 A Wall of Money – Impacts on the Ground 43 Securitisation & the Expansion of Private Sector Health Care 43 Gambling on Commodities – Mining and Food 44 Box : “Food Prices and Speculation” 45 Buying into Water, Mines, Timber and Dams 47 Infrastructure, Infrastructure, Infrastructure 49 Box : “Securitising Infrastructure” 50 Carbon and Weather – New Sources of Alpha 53 Box : “Depression Now and Then” 55 Bricolaging a “Policy Response” 56 A Bricolage of our Own: Some Reflections for Activism 61 Acknowledgments 63 Notes and References 64 0 Preface Brief Encounters with Securitisation and Derivatives In 2004, I and other non-government organisation (NGO) colleagues went to a meeting with UK government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Contribution to the UK Economy of Extractive Industries In
    EIS 43 Written evidence submitted by London Mining Network (LMN) 1. Summary The operations of UK-listed and UK-funded mining companies are causing severe damage and creating a legacy of bitterness. Neither engagement with mining companies nor voluntary initiatives such as EITI are in themselves sufficient to hold mining companies accountable: stricter regulation is necessary. We therefore recommend that either the Financial Conduct Authority or some other statutory body be given the power, responsibility, funding and institutional capacity to enforce good conduct on all UK-listed extractives companies, including those trading on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market. This must extend beyond matters of financial concern to shareholders and include compliance with human rights and environmental standards. 2. Introduction London Mining Network (LMN) is an alliance of eighteen member organizations and twelve observer organizations concerned about the negative impacts of UK-listed and UK-funded mining companies. Our network contains organizations and individuals with many years’ experience working with communities directly and negatively affected by the operations of mining companies listed on the London Stock Exchange or funded by London-based financial institutions. This submission is limited to matters of which our network has direct experience or other expert knowledge, so does not answer every question. We would be happy to testify further in oral hearings. 3. What are the corporate governance concerns raised by the number of extractive industries companies listed in the UK? Are there reputational risks for the UK and UK financial institutions in being a centre for such businesses? LMN notes that corporate governance extends to the wider interests of all those affected by a company’s activities and involves adherence to internationally recognised human rights and environmental standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusion List
    Exclusion list ROBECO INSTITUTIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT 1 Sustainability Inside Excluded companies: 61 Rimbunan Sawit Bhd 15 Bots Inc 62 Riverview Rubber Estates BHD 16 Bright Packaging Industry Bhd Controversial behavior 63 Salim Ivomas Pratama Tbk PT 17 Brilliant Circle Holdings International Ltd 1 G4S International Finance PLC 64 Sarawak Oil Palms Bhd 18 British American Tobacco Bangladesh Co Ltd 2 G4S PLC 65 Sarawak Plantation Bhd 19 British American Tobacco Chile Operaciones SA 3 Korea Electric Power Corp 66 Scope Industries Bhd 20 British American Tobacco Holdings The Netherlands BV 4 Oil & Natural Gas Corp Ltd1 67 Sin Heng Chan Malaya Bhd 21 British American Tobacco Kenya PLC 5 ONGC Nile Ganga BV 68 Sinar Mas Agro Resources & Technology Tbk PT 22 British American Tobacco Malaysia Bhd 6 ONGC Videsh Ltd 69 Socfin 23 British American Tobacco PLC 7 Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 70 Socfinasia SA 24 British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd 8 Vale SA2 71 Societe Camerounaise de Palmeraies 25 British American Tobacco Zambia PLC 72 Societe des Caoutchoucs de Grand-Bereby 26 British American Tobacco Zimbabwe Holdings Ltd Palm oil 73 SSMS Plantation Holdings Pte Ltd 27 Bulgartabac Holding AD 1 A Brown Co Inc 74 Sterling Plantations Ltd 28 Carreras Ltd/Jamaica 2 Agalawatte Plantations PLC 75 Subur Tiasa Holdings Bhd 29 Casey’s General Stores Inc 3 Anglo-Eastern Plantations PLC 76 Sungei Bagan Rubber Co Malaya Bhd 30 Cat Loi JSC 4 Astra Agro Lestari Tbk PT 77 Sunshine Holdings PLC 31 Ceylon Tobacco Co PLC 5 Astral Asia Bhd 78 Ta Ann Holdings Bhd 32 Champion
    [Show full text]
  • Phulbari Coal Project
    GCM Resources plc August 2011 1 Disclaimer • The content of this document has not been approved by an authorised person within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Reliance onthis promotion for the purposes of engaging in any investment activity may expose an individual to a significant risk of losing all of the property or other assets invested. • These presentation materials (the “Presentation Materials”) in respect of GCM Resources plc (the “Company”) and its group are being issued on a strictly private and confidential basis to, and only to, a limited number of identified persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, that is (a) investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended) (the “FPO”), (b) high net worth companies, partnerships and the trustees of high value trusts or unincorporated associations as defined in Article 49 of the FPO, (c) overseas recipients as defined in Article 12 of the FPO, (d) "qualified investors" (as defined in the Prospectus Directive) in the Republic of Ireland, (e) self-certified sophisticated investors within the meaning of Article 50A of the FPO and (f) other persons who are otherwise permitted by law to receive them. These Presentation Materials are made available only to such persons. Persons of any other description should not rely on or act upon the contents of these Presentation Materials. By accepting these Presentation Materials, the recipient represents and warrants that they are a person who falls within the above description of persons entitled to receive these Presentation Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Broker Upgrades and Downgrades & Key Uk
    Shard Capital Stockbrokers T +44 (0) 207 186 9950 rd 23 Floor, F +44 (0) 207 186 9979 20Fenchurch St, E [email protected] London, EC3M 3BY W shardcapitalstockbrokers.com BROKER UPGRADES AND DOWNGRADES & KEY UK CORPORATE SNAPSHOTS 20 November 2017 UK Broker Upgrades / Downgrades Please contact us for more information Code Company Broker Recomm. From Recomm. To Price From Price To Downgrades SBRY J Sainsbury Plc Bernstein Outperform Market Perform Initiate/Neutral/Unchnaged BOO boohoo.com Plc RBC Capital Markets Underperform 160 Charter Court Financial Services CCFS Peel Hunt Buy Buy 305 305 Group Plc GRG Greggs Plc Barclays Capital Equal weight 1405 OCDO Ocado Group Plc RBC Capital Markets Sector Perform 270 OSB OneSavings Bank Plc Peel Hunt Add Add 445 445 RMV Rightmove Plc RBC Capital Markets Sector Perform 4100 https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ BROKER UPGRADES AND DOWNGRADES & KEY UK CORPORATE SNAPSHOTS Key UK Corporate Snapshots Today AIM Access Intelligence Plc (ACC.L) Announced that its new integrated communications platform has driven £450,000 growth in net annual contract value in the last five months. This compares to an increase in net annual contract value of £0.2 million in the first six months of the financial year. Dyson, Thomson Reuters, BMW, Costa, S4C, Sellafield and Lloyds are among the new clients that have signed up to Vuelio services in the period. During the same period, Vuelio has continued to consolidate its strong position in the public sector, with a client base that includes almost half the UK's local councils and universities and over 85% of the UK's police authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks, and London Is Also One of the World’S Main Banking Hubs
    CARBON CAPITAL HOW THE CITY BANKROLLS CLIMATE CHANGE The City of London is at the heart of the UK financial sector. It’s where shares are traded, corporate lending is arranged, and all manner of bets are made on the future price of commodities like oil. Through the Corporation of London, it maintains a powerful lobby for lower business taxes and fewer regulations. And while the UK finance sector is keen to talk up its green credentials, in reality it is bankrolling a global fossil fuels boom, driven on by high oil prices, a dash for gas in electricity supplies, and soaring global demand for coal. Fossil fuel companies raise money through a mix of equity and debt. Large companies usually raise equity by selling shares, and the London Stock Exchange is one of the world’s leading share trading venues. The money mostly comes from ordinary people, but we have little say in the decision of fund managers to invest our pensions, insurance revenues and savings in extractive industries. Debt financing is mainly arranged by banks, and London is also one of the world’s main banking hubs. It hosts the global headquarters of HSBC and Barclays, and the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) operations of every leading US investment bank. Between them they arrange bonds and loans that channel billions of pounds per year into new fossil fuel extraction. Speculation on the future price of oil is a lucrative business too, with London recently surpassing New York as the world’s oil trading capital. The financial sector views fossil fuels as a reliable bet, and is betting on the UK government doing little to curb our oil, gas and coal addiction.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Wall Money
    A (Crumbling) Wall of Money THE Financial Bricolage, CORNER Derivatives and Power HOUSE n 2004, I and other non-governmental organisation (NGO) col- leagues went to a meeting with UK government officials. The pur- Ipose was to discuss the UK’s presidency of the upcoming July 2005 Summit of G8 leaders – the heads of government of the eight leading industrialised countries. One item on the Summit agenda was export credit agency (ECA) reform.1 I was familiar with the UK’s agency, the Export Credits Guarantee Department, from our solidar- ity work with communities around the world affected by the dams, pipelines, power plants and other infrastructure projects that this De- partment had funded.2 NGOs at the time were pressing for ECAs to adopt mandatory environmental, human rights and development stand- ards.3 The UK government officials had other proposals in mind, how- Acknowledgements ever. In particular, they seemed keen to expose the extent to which This paper is the outcome of ECAs were subsidised by the taxpayer. This was (to say the least) numerous discussions with surprising. That’s been the NGO line more than the government’s. In many colleagues, whose fact, the ECGD and other ECAs have consistently and vehemently comments were all critical to denied any element of subsidy in their operations. But the officials its evolution and outcome. The seemed to think that, once the subsidies had been exposed, the ra- author, Nicholas Hildyard, would like to thank them all, and tionale for continued government backing for export credit agencies in particular Larry Lohmann, would be removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory, Accompanying the Map, Presents All the Company Information in One Document
    Corporate Watch Wreckers of the Earth: a guide to ecocidal capitalism in London February 2020 For maps and more see: https://corporatewatch.org/londonmap2020/ Table of Contents Wreckers in London....................................................................................................................4 1. Primary planet-killers.......................................................................................................................6 1.1 Hydrocarbon majors..................................................................................................................6 1.1.1 The national oil companies................................................................................................6 1.1.2 The multinational “oil majors”...........................................................................................9 1.2 Hydrocarbons: smaller oil companies, frackers and UCG......................................................12 1.2.1 Smaller “conventional” oil and gas companies................................................................12 1.2.2 The frackers: “unconventional fossil fuels” specialists...................................................14 1.3 Oil and gas services and shipping............................................................................................16 1.3.1 Oilfield services...............................................................................................................16 1.3.2 Liquefied Natural Gas......................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Ownership
    Coal Ownership (MW) July 2017 - Includes units 30 MW and larger Announced + Pre-permit Cancelled Company Announced Pre-permit Permitted + Permitted Construction Shelved 2010-2017 Operating Retired 24 Hour Company 0 0 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 A Brown Company 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 135 0 A1 Group 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 A2A 375 0 0 375 0 0 0 796 160 Aalborg Forsyning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 716 0 Aarti Steels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 Abhijeet Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,955 244 0 ABL Co. Ltd. 0 112 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 Aboitiz Group 0 0 200 200 755 344 0 500 0 ACB (India) Limited 0 0 0 0 0 1,200 1,200 1,330 0 ACC Limited 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 Accord Energy 0 0 0 0 0 360 0 0 0 Aci Energy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 ACWA Power 3,850 300 720 4,870 1,200 300 0 0 0 Adani Group 600 3,200 3,200 7,000 0 2,920 6,300 10,440 0 Adaro 300 100 0 400 633 0 0 60 0 Adhunik Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,820 570 0 Aditya Birla Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,173 0 AEI (Ashmore Energy International) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 AES 0 168 0 168 168 150 6,780 9,963 4,655 Africa Power House 0 0 330 330 0 0 0 0 0 African Energy Resources 900 0 300 1,200 0 850 0 0 0 AGL Energy 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 5,194 0 Agrofert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 Air Products & Chemicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Akfen Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,900 0 0 Akkan Enerji A.ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Finance Report Card 2015 the End of Coal? Coal Finance Report Card 2015
    THE END OF COAL? COAL FINANCE REPORT CARD 2015 THE END OF COAL? COAL FINANCE REPORT CARD 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 30 APPENDIX 1: Full Coal Mining Rating Criteria and Bank Ratings 3 Executive Summary 36 APPENDIX 2: Full Coal Power Rating Criteria and Bank Ratings 4 Introduction: A Make-or-Break Moment for Banks and Coal 42 APPENDIX 3: Mountaintop Removal Coal Production Data 5 Key Data 44 APPENDIX 4: Top Global Power Companies by Coal-fired Power Capacity 6 Methodology 46 ENDNOTES COAL MINING 48 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 9 Background on Coal Mining 10 Extreme Coal Mining 12 Coal Mining Case Studies 15 Coal Mining Rating Criteria 16 Bank Ratings: Coal Mining Finance 18 League Table: Coal Mining Finance COAL POWER 21 Background on Coal Power 22 Coal Power Case Studies 25 Coal Power Rating Criteria 26 Bank Ratings: Coal Power Finance 28 League Table: Coal Power Finance PHOTO: JOE ATHIALY PUBLICATION DATE: MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 2 | THE END OF COAL However, despite these bright spots, if the financial sector does not act swiftly and decisively to end financing for all coal, the death of coal will come too late for the climate. » In spite of the financial distress faced by the coal industry overall, banks have approached financing decisions in a piecemeal fashion, with global financing for coal mining and top coal-fired power companies holding steady at $144 billion, compared to $145 billion in 2013. » Disappointingly, major banks have also continued to finance several worst-of-the-worst “extreme coal” producers with major human and environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • TEI Times February 2019
    THE ENERGY INDUSTRY February 2019 • Volume 11 • No 12 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Atomic Brexit A smarter world Final Word With Brexit fast approaching, there Distribution Network Operators prepare Does Wylfa demonstrate appears to be only one viable option for an energy market that is much a lack of will for nuclear? to keep nuclear commerce open more distributed. Junior Isles. with the EU. Page 13 Page 14 Page 16 News In Brief USA continues clean energy shift but carbon emissions Wylfa suspension rise in 2018 The USA has seen carbon emissions rise after three years of decline despite coal plants being shut down. Page 2 jeopardises UK Huawei panels pose cyber threat, warns Congress Members of the US Congress have warned that the use of solar equipment manufactured by Chinese nuclear plans group Huawei poses a threat to the country’s cybersecurity. Page 4 China goes big on storage China is planning to build massive amounts of pumped hydro storage and battery capacity as its clean energy transition continues. Hitachi’s Higashihara says a “freeze” Page 6 means the company will not put in any additional investment Germany sets coal phase-out Germany’s government has reached an agreement on when the country will end its reliance on lignite and hard coal fired power generation. Page 7 The UK’s plan to build a new fleet of nuclear power plants is under severe threat following the Uzbek nuclear plans take suspension of another of its proposed projects. Junior Isles shape Construction of Uzbekistan’s first The UK’s plan to build a new fleet of as a private enterprise, noting that “it involved we’ve not been able to cent of electricity demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
    This Glossary has not been updated since 2015-03-24. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms A A activity A adenine A ampere [unit of electric current] Å angstrom a atto [prefix for SI and metric units, 10-18] a year A1 maximum activity of special form radioactive (IAEA Transport material that can be transported in a Type A Regulations) package A2 maximum activity of any radioactive material other (IAEA Transport than special form radioactive material that can be Regulations) transported in a Type A package AAA awareness, appropriateness and audit AAAID Arab Authority for Agricultural Investment and Development AAA Program Advanced Accelerator Applications Program [In (USA) 2003 this developed into the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI).] AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science AAB Audit Advisory Board (India) AAC Austrian Accreditation Council AACB Association of African Central Banks AACR Anglo–American Cataloguing Rules AADFI Association of African Development Finance Institutions AAEA Arab Atomic Energy Agency AAEC Australian Atomic Energy Commission [This was replaced in 1987 by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO).] AAEE American Academy of Environmental Engineers (USA) AAEHC Afghan Atomic Energy High Commission AAES American Association of Engineering Societies (USA) AAFICS Australian Association of Former International Civil Servants AAIS Austrian Accident Insurance Scheme (IAEA) - 1 - This Glossary has not been updated since 2015-03-24. Please check IAEAterm (http://iaeaterm.iaea.org)
    [Show full text]