TEI Times February 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TEI Times February 2019 THE ENERGY INDUSTRY February 2019 • Volume 11 • No 12 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Atomic Brexit A smarter world Final Word With Brexit fast approaching, there Distribution Network Operators prepare Does Wylfa demonstrate appears to be only one viable option for an energy market that is much a lack of will for nuclear? to keep nuclear commerce open more distributed. Junior Isles. with the EU. Page 13 Page 14 Page 16 News In Brief USA continues clean energy shift but carbon emissions Wylfa suspension rise in 2018 The USA has seen carbon emissions rise after three years of decline despite coal plants being shut down. Page 2 jeopardises UK Huawei panels pose cyber threat, warns Congress Members of the US Congress have warned that the use of solar equipment manufactured by Chinese nuclear plans group Huawei poses a threat to the country’s cybersecurity. Page 4 China goes big on storage China is planning to build massive amounts of pumped hydro storage and battery capacity as its clean energy transition continues. Hitachi’s Higashihara says a “freeze” Page 6 means the company will not put in any additional investment Germany sets coal phase-out Germany’s government has reached an agreement on when the country will end its reliance on lignite and hard coal fired power generation. Page 7 The UK’s plan to build a new fleet of nuclear power plants is under severe threat following the Uzbek nuclear plans take suspension of another of its proposed projects. Junior Isles shape Construction of Uzbekistan’s first The UK’s plan to build a new fleet of as a private enterprise, noting that “it involved we’ve not been able to cent of electricity demand. nuclear power plant could start by nuclear power plants is in danger of is now clear that more time is needed reach an agreement to the satisfaction The British government and finan- 2022. collapsing following Hitachi’ deci- to develop a financial structure”. of all concerned. cial institutions agreed to provide Page 8 sion to pull the plug on its 2.9 GW Toshiaki Higashihara, Hitachi’s “As a result we will be suspending ¥2 trillion ($18.3 billion) to support Wylfa project in Anglesey, Wales. The President and CEO, said: “A freeze the development of the Wylfa the project, which was the initial es- Shell partnership eyes news comes just two months after means we will not put in any addi- Newydd project, as well as work re- timated cost. But with escalating Eneco bid Toshiba’s decision to scrap its plan to tional investment.” He added that the lated to Oldbury, until a solution can forecast on the final cost Hitachi has Energy major Shell is considering build the 3.4 GW Moorside plant near company would only renew its in- be found. In the meantime we will failed to find investors to finance the an investment in Dutch sustainable Sellafield, Cumbria. volvement if the project was kept off take steps to reduce our presence but balance. The government revealed it energy group Eneco as part of its Hitachi formally suspended the £20 Hitachi’s balance sheet, required only keep the option to resume develop- had also been willing to offer Con- wider plans to boost its role in new billion ($26.4 billion) project at a a limited capital investment from the ment in future.” tract for Difference terms with a and renewable energy. board meeting in Tokyo in January in company and offered the prospect of The collapse of the power stations strike price of up to £75/MWh. Page 9 a move that will see it write off ¥300 an adequate profit. and the Moorside project that Toshi- Greg Clark, the Secretary of State billion ($2.8 billion) in project related Duncan Hawthorne, CEO of Hori- ba scrapped in November means the for Business Energy and Industrial Fuel Watch: East activities. zon Nuclear Power, the company set government could have a huge hole Strategy addressed the Commons Mediterranean to create The company said it had decided to up by Hitachi to develop the project to fill in the late 2020s and early concerning the UK’s nuclear future Region Gas Forum suspend the Horizon project from the said: “I am very sorry to say that de- 2030s. Together the three power sta- following the announcement. He said: East Mediterranean energy ministers viewpoint of its economic rationality spite the best efforts of everyone tions would have supplied 15 per met last month to kick-start plans for Continued on Page 2 a gas and energy hub in the region. Page 12 Technology: Ramping up Tighter rules needed as energy supplier collapses continue power-to-X There have been calls for energy regu- that eight energy providers ceased however, that asking the regulator sit down and think about this,” said A 50 MW system is being developed lator Ofgem to introduce tighter regu- trading in 2018 and another two have Ofgem to look again on the checks it Keith Anderson, CEO of Scottish- that will allow electricity from wind lation as the number of collapses of closed only 25 days into 2019, indi- does on companies is not the only Power. “I think they need to look at and solar to be used to produce UK energy suppliers reached 10 in the cates that Ofgem does not have the solution needed. the mess that currently exists and how synthetic gas that could serve as a last 12 months. At the end of January correct due diligence in place to en- “The government needs to think it can be dealt with and cleaned up.” form of energy storage and also be Our Power became the latest to fold, sure that energy providers are prop- again about the policies it makes that Lucy warned, however, that the cur- used to decarbonise the industry and two just weeks after Economy Energy erly regulated… Energy suppliers Ofgem has to implement,” he said. rent turmoil, which has largely been transport sectors. ceased trading. should have to validate the financial “Last year we saw eight energy com- the result of too many suppliers enter- Page 15 Industry experts say four major is- health of their business, given that panies collapse and the merger be- ing the market too quickly, should not sues must be addressed relating to there are wider issues surrounding tween SSE and nPower fall apart. The be seen as a reason for consumers to Advertise new entrants: a lack of checks on en- the obtaining of licences in general. collapse of Economy Energy shows favour the Big Six. [email protected] try, unfair cost exemptions, loss-lead- It is only through proper regulation 2019 is going to be no easier for the “It is also important to stress that the ing tariffs, and the lack of conse- that the industry can prevent further energy sector.” closure of the aforementioned energy Subscribe quences for failure. closures.” Members of the ‘Big Six’ suppliers suppliers does not mean that you need [email protected] Jane Lucy, Founder of Labrador, a Professor David Elmes, leader of also called for intervention. “We’ve to submit to poor customer service or call +44 208 523 2573 company that enables automated the Warwick Business School Global got to a point where the industry, the and extortionate prices from the big supplier switching, said: “The fact Energy Research Network, said, regulator and the politicians need to six energy suppliers,” she said. THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES is published by Man in Black Media • www.mibmedia.com • Editor-in-Chief: Junior Isles • For all enquiries email: [email protected] THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - FEBRUARY 2019 2 Headline News Continued from Page 1 “Nuclear has an important role to play, as part of a diverse energy mix, but it must be at a price that is fair to electricity bill payers and to tax- payers. We will work closely with Hitachi and the industry, to ensure that we find the best means of fi- nancing these and other new nucle- USA continues clean ar projects.” The government’s stance has been influenced by the falling cost of re- newables, which have plummeted in recent years, causing a rethink on policy. Clark said clean sources of energy shift but carbon power, such as offshore wind, have fallen in cost “to the point they will soon need no public subsidy”. In a letter published in the Finan- cial Times he wrote: “In fact, the last contract for difference auction in the emissions rise in 2018 UK procured 3 GW of offshore wind – equal to the capacity of a nuclear power station – for only £57.50 per MWh.” Some, however, see Wylfa’s sus- pension as a significant blow to the UK’s future energy supply plans. A statement issued by Matthew Fell, n Carbon emissions increase by 3.4 per cent Chief UK Policy Director at Con- federation of British Industry said: n Electricity demand being met by gas “The government has to demon- strate it is committed to meeting our climate change targets by support- then and 2015, emissions fell by 12.6 November 30, 2018) notes that new forecasts the share of gas fired gen- ing new low-carbon power supply. Junior Isles per cent. Since 2016, the pace of US natural gas generating capacity put in eration will grow to 37 per cent by “The loss of new nuclear projects emissions decline has slowed, from 2.7 service during the first 11 months of 2020 and coal will continue declining could leave us more heavily depen- The USA has seen carbon emissions per cent in 2015 to 1.7 per cent in 2016 2018 totalled 16 687 MW or 68.46 per to 24 per cent by 2020.
Recommended publications
  • A (Crumbling) Wall of Money Financial Bricolage, Derivatives And
    A (Crumbling) Wall of Money Financial Bricolage, Derivatives and Power by Nicholas Hildyard The Corner House, UK www.thecornerhouse.org.uk 8 October 2008 (Work in Progress) Contents Page Preface: Brief Encounters with Securitisation and Derivatives 1 Introduction 4 Creating a Wall of Money 6 Box: “Questions and Answers” 7 The Music Stops: Who’s Holding the (Toxic) Parcel? 9 Box : “Who Knew What and When . .?” 12 Bricolaging Their Way Out of the Crisis 13 Bricolaged Ancestry: The Faux Historicism of a Speculative Tool 15 Derivatives, Hedging and Speculation 18 Alphabetising the Derivatives: CDOs 19 Creating a Derivatives Market 23 Seven (Unstated) Uses for a Derivative 26 ▪ Permitting the Impermissible 27 ▪ Disguising Risk 28 ▪ Beating Basel 28 ▪ Avoiding Law Suits 30 ▪ Inflating Profits, Hiding Debt 30 ▪ Evading Maastricht 31 ▪ Circumventing Stock Market Rules 32 Bricolaging Institutions: Private Equity and Hedge Funds 34 Box: “You Know a Hedge Fund You See It” 35 Bricolaging a Shadow Banking System 37 Derivative Bricolage and “Financialisation” 39 Leveraged Buyouts 39 Mergers and Acquisitions 40 A Wall of Money – Impacts on the Ground 43 Securitisation & the Expansion of Private Sector Health Care 43 Gambling on Commodities – Mining and Food 44 Box : “Food Prices and Speculation” 45 Buying into Water, Mines, Timber and Dams 47 Infrastructure, Infrastructure, Infrastructure 49 Box : “Securitising Infrastructure” 50 Carbon and Weather – New Sources of Alpha 53 Box : “Depression Now and Then” 55 Bricolaging a “Policy Response” 56 A Bricolage of our Own: Some Reflections for Activism 61 Acknowledgments 63 Notes and References 64 0 Preface Brief Encounters with Securitisation and Derivatives In 2004, I and other non-government organisation (NGO) colleagues went to a meeting with UK government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Contribution to the UK Economy of Extractive Industries In
    EIS 43 Written evidence submitted by London Mining Network (LMN) 1. Summary The operations of UK-listed and UK-funded mining companies are causing severe damage and creating a legacy of bitterness. Neither engagement with mining companies nor voluntary initiatives such as EITI are in themselves sufficient to hold mining companies accountable: stricter regulation is necessary. We therefore recommend that either the Financial Conduct Authority or some other statutory body be given the power, responsibility, funding and institutional capacity to enforce good conduct on all UK-listed extractives companies, including those trading on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market. This must extend beyond matters of financial concern to shareholders and include compliance with human rights and environmental standards. 2. Introduction London Mining Network (LMN) is an alliance of eighteen member organizations and twelve observer organizations concerned about the negative impacts of UK-listed and UK-funded mining companies. Our network contains organizations and individuals with many years’ experience working with communities directly and negatively affected by the operations of mining companies listed on the London Stock Exchange or funded by London-based financial institutions. This submission is limited to matters of which our network has direct experience or other expert knowledge, so does not answer every question. We would be happy to testify further in oral hearings. 3. What are the corporate governance concerns raised by the number of extractive industries companies listed in the UK? Are there reputational risks for the UK and UK financial institutions in being a centre for such businesses? LMN notes that corporate governance extends to the wider interests of all those affected by a company’s activities and involves adherence to internationally recognised human rights and environmental standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusion List
    Exclusion list ROBECO INSTITUTIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT 1 Sustainability Inside Excluded companies: 61 Rimbunan Sawit Bhd 15 Bots Inc 62 Riverview Rubber Estates BHD 16 Bright Packaging Industry Bhd Controversial behavior 63 Salim Ivomas Pratama Tbk PT 17 Brilliant Circle Holdings International Ltd 1 G4S International Finance PLC 64 Sarawak Oil Palms Bhd 18 British American Tobacco Bangladesh Co Ltd 2 G4S PLC 65 Sarawak Plantation Bhd 19 British American Tobacco Chile Operaciones SA 3 Korea Electric Power Corp 66 Scope Industries Bhd 20 British American Tobacco Holdings The Netherlands BV 4 Oil & Natural Gas Corp Ltd1 67 Sin Heng Chan Malaya Bhd 21 British American Tobacco Kenya PLC 5 ONGC Nile Ganga BV 68 Sinar Mas Agro Resources & Technology Tbk PT 22 British American Tobacco Malaysia Bhd 6 ONGC Videsh Ltd 69 Socfin 23 British American Tobacco PLC 7 Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 70 Socfinasia SA 24 British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd 8 Vale SA2 71 Societe Camerounaise de Palmeraies 25 British American Tobacco Zambia PLC 72 Societe des Caoutchoucs de Grand-Bereby 26 British American Tobacco Zimbabwe Holdings Ltd Palm oil 73 SSMS Plantation Holdings Pte Ltd 27 Bulgartabac Holding AD 1 A Brown Co Inc 74 Sterling Plantations Ltd 28 Carreras Ltd/Jamaica 2 Agalawatte Plantations PLC 75 Subur Tiasa Holdings Bhd 29 Casey’s General Stores Inc 3 Anglo-Eastern Plantations PLC 76 Sungei Bagan Rubber Co Malaya Bhd 30 Cat Loi JSC 4 Astra Agro Lestari Tbk PT 77 Sunshine Holdings PLC 31 Ceylon Tobacco Co PLC 5 Astral Asia Bhd 78 Ta Ann Holdings Bhd 32 Champion
    [Show full text]
  • Phulbari Coal Project
    GCM Resources plc August 2011 1 Disclaimer • The content of this document has not been approved by an authorised person within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Reliance onthis promotion for the purposes of engaging in any investment activity may expose an individual to a significant risk of losing all of the property or other assets invested. • These presentation materials (the “Presentation Materials”) in respect of GCM Resources plc (the “Company”) and its group are being issued on a strictly private and confidential basis to, and only to, a limited number of identified persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments, that is (a) investment professionals within the meaning of Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (as amended) (the “FPO”), (b) high net worth companies, partnerships and the trustees of high value trusts or unincorporated associations as defined in Article 49 of the FPO, (c) overseas recipients as defined in Article 12 of the FPO, (d) "qualified investors" (as defined in the Prospectus Directive) in the Republic of Ireland, (e) self-certified sophisticated investors within the meaning of Article 50A of the FPO and (f) other persons who are otherwise permitted by law to receive them. These Presentation Materials are made available only to such persons. Persons of any other description should not rely on or act upon the contents of these Presentation Materials. By accepting these Presentation Materials, the recipient represents and warrants that they are a person who falls within the above description of persons entitled to receive these Presentation Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Broker Upgrades and Downgrades & Key Uk
    Shard Capital Stockbrokers T +44 (0) 207 186 9950 rd 23 Floor, F +44 (0) 207 186 9979 20Fenchurch St, E [email protected] London, EC3M 3BY W shardcapitalstockbrokers.com BROKER UPGRADES AND DOWNGRADES & KEY UK CORPORATE SNAPSHOTS 20 November 2017 UK Broker Upgrades / Downgrades Please contact us for more information Code Company Broker Recomm. From Recomm. To Price From Price To Downgrades SBRY J Sainsbury Plc Bernstein Outperform Market Perform Initiate/Neutral/Unchnaged BOO boohoo.com Plc RBC Capital Markets Underperform 160 Charter Court Financial Services CCFS Peel Hunt Buy Buy 305 305 Group Plc GRG Greggs Plc Barclays Capital Equal weight 1405 OCDO Ocado Group Plc RBC Capital Markets Sector Perform 270 OSB OneSavings Bank Plc Peel Hunt Add Add 445 445 RMV Rightmove Plc RBC Capital Markets Sector Perform 4100 https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ https://www.shardcapitalstockbrokers.com/trading-platform/ BROKER UPGRADES AND DOWNGRADES & KEY UK CORPORATE SNAPSHOTS Key UK Corporate Snapshots Today AIM Access Intelligence Plc (ACC.L) Announced that its new integrated communications platform has driven £450,000 growth in net annual contract value in the last five months. This compares to an increase in net annual contract value of £0.2 million in the first six months of the financial year. Dyson, Thomson Reuters, BMW, Costa, S4C, Sellafield and Lloyds are among the new clients that have signed up to Vuelio services in the period. During the same period, Vuelio has continued to consolidate its strong position in the public sector, with a client base that includes almost half the UK's local councils and universities and over 85% of the UK's police authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks, and London Is Also One of the World’S Main Banking Hubs
    CARBON CAPITAL HOW THE CITY BANKROLLS CLIMATE CHANGE The City of London is at the heart of the UK financial sector. It’s where shares are traded, corporate lending is arranged, and all manner of bets are made on the future price of commodities like oil. Through the Corporation of London, it maintains a powerful lobby for lower business taxes and fewer regulations. And while the UK finance sector is keen to talk up its green credentials, in reality it is bankrolling a global fossil fuels boom, driven on by high oil prices, a dash for gas in electricity supplies, and soaring global demand for coal. Fossil fuel companies raise money through a mix of equity and debt. Large companies usually raise equity by selling shares, and the London Stock Exchange is one of the world’s leading share trading venues. The money mostly comes from ordinary people, but we have little say in the decision of fund managers to invest our pensions, insurance revenues and savings in extractive industries. Debt financing is mainly arranged by banks, and London is also one of the world’s main banking hubs. It hosts the global headquarters of HSBC and Barclays, and the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) operations of every leading US investment bank. Between them they arrange bonds and loans that channel billions of pounds per year into new fossil fuel extraction. Speculation on the future price of oil is a lucrative business too, with London recently surpassing New York as the world’s oil trading capital. The financial sector views fossil fuels as a reliable bet, and is betting on the UK government doing little to curb our oil, gas and coal addiction.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Wall Money
    A (Crumbling) Wall of Money THE Financial Bricolage, CORNER Derivatives and Power HOUSE n 2004, I and other non-governmental organisation (NGO) col- leagues went to a meeting with UK government officials. The pur- Ipose was to discuss the UK’s presidency of the upcoming July 2005 Summit of G8 leaders – the heads of government of the eight leading industrialised countries. One item on the Summit agenda was export credit agency (ECA) reform.1 I was familiar with the UK’s agency, the Export Credits Guarantee Department, from our solidar- ity work with communities around the world affected by the dams, pipelines, power plants and other infrastructure projects that this De- partment had funded.2 NGOs at the time were pressing for ECAs to adopt mandatory environmental, human rights and development stand- ards.3 The UK government officials had other proposals in mind, how- Acknowledgements ever. In particular, they seemed keen to expose the extent to which This paper is the outcome of ECAs were subsidised by the taxpayer. This was (to say the least) numerous discussions with surprising. That’s been the NGO line more than the government’s. In many colleagues, whose fact, the ECGD and other ECAs have consistently and vehemently comments were all critical to denied any element of subsidy in their operations. But the officials its evolution and outcome. The seemed to think that, once the subsidies had been exposed, the ra- author, Nicholas Hildyard, would like to thank them all, and tionale for continued government backing for export credit agencies in particular Larry Lohmann, would be removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory, Accompanying the Map, Presents All the Company Information in One Document
    Corporate Watch Wreckers of the Earth: a guide to ecocidal capitalism in London February 2020 For maps and more see: https://corporatewatch.org/londonmap2020/ Table of Contents Wreckers in London....................................................................................................................4 1. Primary planet-killers.......................................................................................................................6 1.1 Hydrocarbon majors..................................................................................................................6 1.1.1 The national oil companies................................................................................................6 1.1.2 The multinational “oil majors”...........................................................................................9 1.2 Hydrocarbons: smaller oil companies, frackers and UCG......................................................12 1.2.1 Smaller “conventional” oil and gas companies................................................................12 1.2.2 The frackers: “unconventional fossil fuels” specialists...................................................14 1.3 Oil and gas services and shipping............................................................................................16 1.3.1 Oilfield services...............................................................................................................16 1.3.2 Liquefied Natural Gas......................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Ownership
    Coal Ownership (MW) July 2017 - Includes units 30 MW and larger Announced + Pre-permit Cancelled Company Announced Pre-permit Permitted + Permitted Construction Shelved 2010-2017 Operating Retired 24 Hour Company 0 0 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 A Brown Company 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 135 0 A1 Group 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 A2A 375 0 0 375 0 0 0 796 160 Aalborg Forsyning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 716 0 Aarti Steels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 Abhijeet Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,955 244 0 ABL Co. Ltd. 0 112 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 Aboitiz Group 0 0 200 200 755 344 0 500 0 ACB (India) Limited 0 0 0 0 0 1,200 1,200 1,330 0 ACC Limited 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 Accord Energy 0 0 0 0 0 360 0 0 0 Aci Energy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 ACWA Power 3,850 300 720 4,870 1,200 300 0 0 0 Adani Group 600 3,200 3,200 7,000 0 2,920 6,300 10,440 0 Adaro 300 100 0 400 633 0 0 60 0 Adhunik Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,820 570 0 Aditya Birla Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,173 0 AEI (Ashmore Energy International) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 AES 0 168 0 168 168 150 6,780 9,963 4,655 Africa Power House 0 0 330 330 0 0 0 0 0 African Energy Resources 900 0 300 1,200 0 850 0 0 0 AGL Energy 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 5,194 0 Agrofert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 Air Products & Chemicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Akfen Group 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,900 0 0 Akkan Enerji A.ş.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Finance Report Card 2015 the End of Coal? Coal Finance Report Card 2015
    THE END OF COAL? COAL FINANCE REPORT CARD 2015 THE END OF COAL? COAL FINANCE REPORT CARD 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 30 APPENDIX 1: Full Coal Mining Rating Criteria and Bank Ratings 3 Executive Summary 36 APPENDIX 2: Full Coal Power Rating Criteria and Bank Ratings 4 Introduction: A Make-or-Break Moment for Banks and Coal 42 APPENDIX 3: Mountaintop Removal Coal Production Data 5 Key Data 44 APPENDIX 4: Top Global Power Companies by Coal-fired Power Capacity 6 Methodology 46 ENDNOTES COAL MINING 48 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 9 Background on Coal Mining 10 Extreme Coal Mining 12 Coal Mining Case Studies 15 Coal Mining Rating Criteria 16 Bank Ratings: Coal Mining Finance 18 League Table: Coal Mining Finance COAL POWER 21 Background on Coal Power 22 Coal Power Case Studies 25 Coal Power Rating Criteria 26 Bank Ratings: Coal Power Finance 28 League Table: Coal Power Finance PHOTO: JOE ATHIALY PUBLICATION DATE: MAY 4, 2015 PAGE 2 | THE END OF COAL However, despite these bright spots, if the financial sector does not act swiftly and decisively to end financing for all coal, the death of coal will come too late for the climate. » In spite of the financial distress faced by the coal industry overall, banks have approached financing decisions in a piecemeal fashion, with global financing for coal mining and top coal-fired power companies holding steady at $144 billion, compared to $145 billion in 2013. » Disappointingly, major banks have also continued to finance several worst-of-the-worst “extreme coal” producers with major human and environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
    This Glossary has not been updated since 2015-03-24. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms A A activity A adenine A ampere [unit of electric current] Å angstrom a atto [prefix for SI and metric units, 10-18] a year A1 maximum activity of special form radioactive (IAEA Transport material that can be transported in a Type A Regulations) package A2 maximum activity of any radioactive material other (IAEA Transport than special form radioactive material that can be Regulations) transported in a Type A package AAA awareness, appropriateness and audit AAAID Arab Authority for Agricultural Investment and Development AAA Program Advanced Accelerator Applications Program [In (USA) 2003 this developed into the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI).] AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science AAB Audit Advisory Board (India) AAC Austrian Accreditation Council AACB Association of African Central Banks AACR Anglo–American Cataloguing Rules AADFI Association of African Development Finance Institutions AAEA Arab Atomic Energy Agency AAEC Australian Atomic Energy Commission [This was replaced in 1987 by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO).] AAEE American Academy of Environmental Engineers (USA) AAEHC Afghan Atomic Energy High Commission AAES American Association of Engineering Societies (USA) AAFICS Australian Association of Former International Civil Servants AAIS Austrian Accident Insurance Scheme (IAEA) - 1 - This Glossary has not been updated since 2015-03-24. Please check IAEAterm (http://iaeaterm.iaea.org)
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of PESTLE Factors on Power Generation Projects of Bangladesh
    Impact of PESTLE Factors on Power Generation Projects of Bangladesh Submitted by Farhan Hussain MPSM, Batch-2 Student ID: 13182003 This Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Masters in Procurement and Supply Management Supervised by Professor & Dean Dr.Nazrul Islam Faculty of Business Administration Eastern University April, 2013 Institute of Governance Studies BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. I authorize the Institute of Governance Studies (IGS) and BRAC University to lend this thesis to other Institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research only. I further authorize the IGS and BRAC University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions for the purpose of scholarly research. Farhan Hussain Student ID: 13182003 Institute of Governance Studies (IGS), BRAC University, Dhaka Acknowledgement I am very grateful to the well known Dr.Nazrul Islam, Professor and Dean, Faculty of Business Administration, Eastern University, Dhaka for reviewing my manuscript in spite of his very busy schedule. He made several important suggestions which enhanced my study. I am also indebted to the Director, the faculty and staff members of Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University, Dhaka for providing me with crucial study materials on research methodology and dissertation template. They allowed me to use the Computer Lab and the Library facilities of IGS, BRAC University from where I have obtained some important papers and articles which contributed immensely to the success of my study.
    [Show full text]