DOCSLIB.ORG

Apalachicola Watershed Invasive Exotic Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apalachicola Watershed Invasive Exotic Management Plan ARSA CISMA PLAN APALACHICOLA REGIONAL STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE (ARSA) COOPERATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT AREA (CISMA) BAY, CALHOUN, FRANKLIN, GADSDEN, GULF, JACKSON, LEON, LIBERTY, AND WAKULLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA 0 ARSA CISMA PLAN ARSA CISMA PLAN APALACHICOLA REGIONAL STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE (ARSA) COOPERATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT AREA (CISMA) BAY, CALHOUN, FRANKLIN, GADSDEN, GULF, JACKSON, LEON, LIBERTY, AND WAKULLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA Prepared in June 2007 by Lindsey M. Wood, Elizabeth A. Mizell, and Steven J. Herrington Updated in June 2011 by Joshua J. Spies The Nature Conservancy Northwest Florida Program 10394 NW Longleaf DR Bristol, FL 32321-0393 (850) 643-2756 1 ARSA CISMA PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June of 2003 the Apalachicola Regional Stewardship Alliance (ARSA) Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area (CISMA) was founded by stakeholders in the Apalachicola River region. This plan was originally created in June of 2007 by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) with support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). TNC updated and expanded this document in June of 2011 with support from U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Legacy Resource Management Program. The general objective of this project is to reduce the threats posed to natural communities by non-native invasive species. After habitat loss and degradation, non-native invasive species are the most serious threat to biodiversity in the U.S. These species interfere with ecosystem processes, such as hydrology and fire, and out-compete native flora and fauna for critical habitat. Non-native invasive species do not adhere to political boundaries, making collaboration between conservation cooperators essential for the continued preservation of native plant and animal communities. The effectiveness of efforts to manage current non-native invasive species infestations and stem future establishments in the Apalachicola River region are dependent upon a collaborative strategy adopted by partnering agencies. This plan offers information necessary to implement such a strategy. The first step of this approach is the prevention of new introductions, accompanied by eradication of incipient populations and finally, the management of well-established species. The philosophy behind this approach is to maximize limited financial and personnel resources throughout the region, prioritize highly valued sites, and reduce threats on a landscape scale. ARSA cooperators will utilize this plan to determine strategic actions for the CISMA. Individual land managers are encouraged to use this document as a guide to implement strategies on their own sites. This method will be used as a management tool to protect the native flora and fauna of the Apalachicola River region and serve as a model for other regions. 2 ARSA CISMA PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without financial support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). We are grateful to these entities and individuals, particularly Melody Ray-Culp (FWS), Allen Richmond (DOD), and Roy Ogles (DEP) for the opportunity they have given us to promote conservation in our region. We also thank Kristina Serbesoff-King and Mike Renda for their expertise and input throughout the drafting of this document. Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) and Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) provided the maps for this document. We are grateful for their support. These maps were updated with data from the FNAI Invasive Plant Database, EDDMapS, and CISMA cooperators. We would also like to thank Jessica Avant, Ricky Hathcock, Karey Lehnert, Jamie Luten, Sarah Braun, Cynthia Brown, Michael Buono, Richard Butgereit, Max Feken, Emily Foster, Amy Jenkins, Michael Jenkins, Wendy Jones, Dean Jue, Elisabeth King, Betty Levin, Gerrod Pogge, Matthew Purdy, and Charles Riddle for their assistance with field data collection and management. The following individuals offered their expertise in selecting the non-native invasive species included in this document: John Dunlap, Wayne Harris, Dean Jue, Drew Leslie, and Tova Spector. We are grateful for their participation. 3 ARSA CISMA PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 3 CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 PLAN DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................................... 9 THE ARSA CISMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................. 10 MISSION ................................................................................................................................................ 11 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 12 LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................... 12 BIOGEOPHRAPHICAL HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 14 NON-NATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES .............................................................................................................................. 15 NON-NATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES IN THE U.S. AND FLORIDA ............................................................................... 15 NON-NATIVE INVASIVE SPECIES IN THE APALACHICOLA RIVER REGION ................................................................ 16 COASTAL UPLANDS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 ESTUARINE ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 17 MESIC UPLANDS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 MESIC AND WET FLATLANDS ................................................................................................................................................................. 18 RIVERINE ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 XERIC UPLANDS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 MANAGEMENT APPROACH ................................................................................................................................. 20 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 20 PRIORITIZATION ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 RANKING AND SCORING PROTOCOL FOR PLANT SPECIES .................................................................................. 21 CISMA STRATEGIC PLAN TEMPLATE ....................................................................................................................... 23 GOAL 1: CREATE, STRENGTHEN AND SUSTAIN A CISMA .................................................................................. 24 GOAL 2: PREVENTION ............................................................................................................................... 25 GOAL 3: EARLY DETECTION AND RAPID RESPONSE (EDRR) .............................................................................. 27 GOAL 4: CONTROL (PRIORITIZED MANAGEMENT) .......................................................................................... 29 GOAL 5: MONITORING, MAPPING AND APPLIED RESEARCH ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Georgia
    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae
    A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCULIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 1997 Major Subject; Entomology A FAUNAL SURVEY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE CURCVLIONOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) (EXCLUDING ANTHRIBIDAE, PLATYPODINAE. AND SCOLYTINAE) OF THE LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY OF TEXAS A Thesis by TAMI ANNE CARLOW Submitted to Texas AgcM University in partial fulltllment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: Horace R. Burke (Chair of Committee) James B. Woolley ay, Frisbie (Member) (Head of Department) Gilbert L. Schroeter (Member) August 1997 Major Subject: Entomology A Faunal Survey and Zoogeographic Analysis of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) (Excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) of the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. (August 1997) Tami Anne Carlow. B.S. , Cornell University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Horace R. Burke An annotated list of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptem) (excluding Anthribidae, Platypodinae, and Scolytinae) is presented for the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) of Texas. The list includes species that occur in Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Wigacy counties. Each of the 23S species in 97 genera is tteated according to its geographical range. Lower Rio Grande distribution, seasonal activity, plant associations, and biology. The taxonomic atTangement follows O' Brien &, Wibmer (I og2). A table of the species occuning in patxicular areas of the Lower Rio Grande Valley, such as the Boca Chica Beach area, the Sabal Palm Grove Sanctuary, Bentsen-Rio Grande State Park, and the Falcon Dam area is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Curculio a Newsletter Devoted to Dissemination of Knowledge About Curculionoidea
    CURCULIO A NEWSLETTER DEVOTED TO DISSEMINATION OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CURCULIONOIDEA NO. 41 - MARCH 1997 CANADIAN MUSEUM OF NATURE P.O. BOX 3443, STATION D EDITED BY OTTAWA, ON. K1P 6P4 ROBERT S. ANDERSON CANADA Mike Morris (retired) September 1992, Poland CURCULIO EDITORIAL COMMENTS Yes, this number of CURCULIO is late. It should have been prepared and sent out in September of 1996, but our museum has been going through a move to new facilities and things have been in turmoil. We are now settled in and most services are up and running again. The collections, which were packed away for the move, are also now accessible again. Seems that things went quite well and in fact our Entomology section fared quite well as the move into our new facilities resulted in a great deal more space than we already had. We’re now getting the laboratories prepared and should be back to full speed in the near future. Our mailing address has not changed! On another note, congratulations are in order for Rolf Oberprieler who has accepted the weevil systematics position at CSIRO in Canberra, Australia. This will be a great new challenge for Rolf and one in which we can all be sure he will fare admirably. The Australian weevil fauna is exceptionally diverse and interesting and with the recent books by Elwood Zimmerman, a great base has been set for further and more detailed work on the fauna. I understand Rolf will be there sometime this summer. Now all he has to do is master ‘G’Day’ and ‘mate’ and he’ll have it made! Best wishes to Rolf and his family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society
    Volume 28: Number 1 > Winter/Spring 2011 PalmettoThe Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Protecting Endangered Plants in Panhandle Parks ● Native or Not? Carica papaya ● Water Science & Plants Protecting Endangered Plant Species Sweetwater slope: Bill and Pam Anderson To date, a total of 117 listed taxa have been recorded in 26 panhandle parks, making these parks a key resource for the protection of endangered plant species. 4 ● The Palmetto Volume 28:1 ● Winter/Spring 2011 in Panhandle State Parks by Gil Nelson and Tova Spector The Florida Panhandle is well known for its natural endowments, chief among which are its botanical and ecological diversity. Approximately 242 sensitive plant taxa occur in the 21 counties west of the Suwannee River. These include 15 taxa listed as endangered or threatened by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 212 listed as endangered or threatened by the State of Florida, 191 tracked by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory, 52 candidates for federal listing, and 7 categorized by the state as commercially exploited. Since the conservation of threatened and endangered plant species depends largely on effective management of protected populations, the occurrence of such plants on publicly or privately owned conservation lands, coupled with institutional knowledge of their location and extent is essential. District 1 of the Florida Sarracenia rosea (purple pitcherplant) at Ponce de Leon Springs State Park: Park Service manages 33 state parks encompassing approximately Tova Spector, Florida Department of Environmental Protection 53,877 acres in the 18 counties from Jefferson County and the southwestern portion of Taylor County westward.
    [Show full text]
  • Torreya Taxifolia
    photograph © Abraham Rammeloo Torreya taxifolia produces seeds in 40 Kalmthout Arboretum ABRAHAM RAMMELOO, Curator of the Kalmthout Arboretum, writes about this rare conifer that recently produced seed for the first time. Torreya is a genus of conifers that comprises four to six species that are native to North America and Asia. It is closely related to Taxus and Cephalotaxus and is easily confused with the latter. However, it is relatively easy to distinguish them apart by their leaves. Torreya has needles with, on the underside, two small edges with stomas giving it a green appearance; Cephalotaxus has different rows of stomas, and for this reason the underside is more of a white colour. It is very rare to find Torreya taxifolia in the wild; it is native to a small area in Florida and Georgia. It grows in steep limestone cliffs along the Apalachicola River. These trees come from a warm and humid climate where the temperature in winter occasionally falls below freezing. They grow mainly on north-facing slopes between Fagus grandifolia, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer barbatum, Liquidambar styraciflua and Quercus alba. They can grow up to 15 to 20 m high. The needles are sharp and pointed and grow in a whorled pattern along the branches. They are 25 to 35 mm long and stay on the tree for three to four years. If you crush them, they give off a strong, sharp odour. The health and reproduction of the adult population of this species suffered INTERNATIONAL DENDROLOGY SOCIETY TREES Opposite Torreya taxifolia ‘Argentea’ growing at Kalmthout Arboretum in Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing History
    Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911 Tracing History Phylogenetic, Taxonomic, and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family BY ANNIKA VINNERSTEN ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS UPPSALA 2003 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Lindahlsalen, EBC, Uppsala, Friday, December 12, 2003 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Vinnersten, A. 2003. Tracing History. Phylogenetic, Taxonomic and Biogeographic Research in the Colchicum Family. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 911. 33 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-554-5814-9 This thesis concerns the history and the intrafamilial delimitations of the plant family Colchicaceae. A phylogeny of 73 taxa representing all genera of Colchicaceae, except the monotypic Kuntheria, is presented. The molecular analysis based on three plastid regions—the rps16 intron, the atpB- rbcL intergenic spacer, and the trnL-F region—reveal the intrafamilial classification to be in need of revision. The two tribes Iphigenieae and Uvularieae are demonstrated to be paraphyletic. The well-known genus Colchicum is shown to be nested within Androcymbium, Onixotis constitutes a grade between Neodregea and Wurmbea, and Gloriosa is intermixed with species of Littonia. Two new tribes are described, Burchardieae and Tripladenieae, and the two tribes Colchiceae and Uvularieae are emended, leaving four tribes in the family. At generic level new combinations are made in Wurmbea and Gloriosa in order to render them monophyletic. The genus Androcymbium is paraphyletic in relation to Colchicum and the latter genus is therefore expanded.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    PROCEEDINGS of the Indiana Academy of Science Founded December 29, 1885 Volume 87 1977 Benjamin Moulton, Editor Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana Spring Meeting April 22, 1977 Indiana University — Purdue University at Indianapolis Indianapolis, Indiana Fall Meeting October 27, 1977 Indiana University- Purdue University at Indianapolis Indianapolis, Indiana Published at Indianapolis, Indiana 1978 1. The permanent address of the Academy is the Indiana State Library, 140 N. Senate Ave., Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. 2. Instructions for Contributors appear at the end of this volume. 3. Exchanges. Items sent in exchange for the Proceedings and correspondence concerning exchange arrangements should be addressed: John Shepard Wright Memorial Library of the Indiana Academy of Science c/o Indiana State Library Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 4. Proceedings may be purchased through the State Library at $7.00 per volume. 5. Reprints of technical papers can often be secured from the authors. They cannot be supplied by the State Library nor by the officers of the Academy. 6. The Constitution and By-Laws reprinted from Vol. 74 are available to members upon appli- cation to the Secretary. Necrologies reprinted from the various volumes can be supplied to relatives and friends of deceased members by the Secretary. 7. Officers whose names and addresses are not known to correspondents may be addressed care of the State Library. Papers published in the Proceedings of the Academy of Science are abstracted or indexed in appropriate services listed here:
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation Classification of the South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone Forest Association of Central Georgia
    VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH (Under the Direction of J.L. Hamrick) ABSTRACT The South Atlantic Coastal Plain Limestone forest is a globally imperiled (G2) forest association known only from the upper Coastal Plain of central Georgia. These calcareous forest communities support diverse floristic assemblages unique among the Georgia Coastal Plain, but have not been subject to detailed floristic study. I conducted a comprehensive floristic inventory, multivariate community analyses and floristic quality assessments to document composition, elucidate community structure and underlying physiographic regimes, and assess habitat integrity for seven sites in Houston, Bleckley and Twiggs counties. Community analyses revealed twelve community types within two floristically defined domains corresponding to uplands and slopes, and bottomlands, respectively, and governed largely by moisture content and degree of inclination. Floristic quality assessments revealed varying degrees of floristic quality and habitat integrity corresponding primarily to local physiography and disturbance history. Floristic inventory recovered 339 vascular plant taxa representing 218 genera in 98 families, including 17 rare Georgia species. INDEX WORDS: Limestone forest, community analysis, floristic inventory, floristic quality assessment, Georgia, Coastal Plain. VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH B.S., The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2006 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2010 © 2012 Patrick Sumner Lynch All Rights Reserved VASCULAR FLORA AND VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN LIMESTONE FOREST ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA by PATRICK SUMNER LYNCH Major Professor: J.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Cocoa Beach Maritime Hammock Preserve Management Plan
    MANAGEMENT PLAN Cocoa Beach’s Maritime Hammock Preserve City of Cocoa Beach, Florida Florida Communities Trust Project No. 03 – 035 –FF3 Adopted March 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 1 II. Purpose …………………………………………………………….……. 2 a. Future Uses ………….………………………………….…….…… 2 b. Management Objectives ………………………………………….... 2 c. Major Comprehensive Plan Directives ………………………..….... 2 III. Site Development and Improvement ………………………………… 3 a. Existing Physical Improvements ……….…………………………. 3 b. Proposed Physical Improvements…………………………………… 3 c. Wetland Buffer ………...………….………………………………… 4 d. Acknowledgment Sign …………………………………..………… 4 e. Parking ………………………….………………………………… 5 f. Stormwater Facilities …………….………………………………… 5 g. Hazard Mitigation ………………………………………………… 5 h. Permits ………………………….………………………………… 5 i. Easements, Concessions, and Leases …………………………..… 5 IV. Natural Resources ……………………………………………..……… 6 a. Natural Communities ………………………..……………………. 6 b. Listed Animal Species ………………………….…………….……. 7 c. Listed Plant Species …………………………..…………………... 8 d. Inventory of the Natural Communities ………………..………….... 10 e. Water Quality …………..………………………….…..…………... 10 f. Unique Geological Features ………………………………………. 10 g. Trail Network ………………………………….…..………..……... 10 h. Greenways ………………………………….…..……………..……. 11 i Adopted March 18, 2004 V. Resources Enhancement …………………………..…………………… 11 a. Upland Restoration ………………………..………………………. 11 b. Wetland Restoration ………………………….…………….………. 13 c. Invasive Exotic Plants …………………………..…………………... 13 d. Feral
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Salix L. Subg. Salix Species (Salicaceae) According to Sequencing Data of Intergenic Spacers of the Chloroplast Genome and ITS Rdna V
    ISSN 10227954, Russian Journal of Genetics, 2014, Vol. 50, No. 8, pp. 828–837. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2014. Original Russian Text © V.Yu. Barkalov, M.M. Kozyrenko, 2014, published in Genetika, 2014, Vol. 50, No. 8, pp. 940–949. PLANT GENETICS Phylogenetic Relationships of Salix L. subg. Salix Species (Salicaceae) according to Sequencing Data of Intergenic Spacers of the Chloroplast Genome and ITS rDNA V. Yu. Barkalov and M. M. Kozyrenko Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia email: [email protected] Received January 29, 2014 Abstract—A phylogenetic analysis based on a comparison of nucleotide sequences of six regions (petN– psbM, trnD–trnT, trnC–petN, psaA–ycf3, petG–trnP, and rpoB–trnC) of cpDNA and ITS rDNA allowed for elucidating the relationship among species and sections belonging to the Salix subgenus and, more generally, to the Salix genus, as well as revealing the relations of the Chosenia genus. The definition of the subgenera Pleuradenia (including the Urbanianae section and the Chosenia genus), Salix (without the Triandrae sec tion), Triandrae, and Longifoliae is essentially consistent with current classification schemes of the Salix genus. The previously defined genera of Chosenia and Toisusu (Urbanianae) are not only merged with the Salix genus but are also closely related between themselves. The Protitea subgenus only corresponds to the American species of the Humboldtianae section (S. humboldtiana, S. amygdaloides, S. gooddingii). The rela tionship of S. chaenomeloides, which is a nomenclatural type of this subgenus, as well as the relationship of the Wilsonia section, remains unresolved.
    [Show full text]