DOCSLIB.ORG

Normal Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Normal Template MOODY MARINE LTD Ref: 802020 v6 Author(s): J Nichols, T Huntington, D. Bennett, A. Hough Public Certification Report for NESFC Sea Bass Fishery Client: North East Sea Fisheries Committee Certification Body: Client Contact: Moody Marine Ltd North Eastern Sea Fisheries Committee Moody International Certification Town Hall Merlin House Bridlington Stanier Way East Riding of Yorkshire. YO16 4LP Wyvern Business Park Tel: +44 (0)1482 393690 Derby DE21 6BF Fax: +44 (0)1482 393699 UK Tel: +44 (0) 1332 544663 Fax: +44 (0) 1332 675020 802020 v6 Public Certification Report Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE FISHERY PROPOSED FOR CERTIFICATION ..................................................................... 1 1.2 REPORT STRUCTURE AND ASSESSMENT PROCESS ................................................................ 1 1.3 INFORMATION SOURCES USED ................................................................................................ 2 1.3.1 Principal Information Sources .................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Other information sources .......................................................................................................... 2 2 BACKGROUND TO THE FISHERY ................................................................... 5 2.1 BIOLOGY OF THE TARGET SPECIES ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 HISTORY OF THE FISHERY ....................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 NW European Fishery ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.2 North Sea Fishery .................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT FISHERY ................................................................................. 10 2.3.1 Gears Used ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.3.3 Quotas and Controls .................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 FISHING LOCATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES ............................................. 13 2.4 ECOSYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................ 14 2.5 BY-CATCH AND DISCARD ...................................................................................................... 16 2.5.1 Incidental Catch ...................................................................................................................... 16 2.5.2 Discards ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.5.3 Catch of Threatened, Rare and Iconic Species ........................................................................... 17 2.6 HABITAT AND ECOSYSTEM IMPACTS ................................................................................... 17 2.6.1 Habitat Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.6.2 Gear Loss and Ghost Fishing ................................................................................................. 17 2.6.3 Ecosystem Impacts .................................................................................................................. 18 3 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTEXT .......................................................................... 19 3.1 LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.2 Species Specific ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.3 Local Byelaws ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AND INTERACTIONS ................................................... 20 3.2.1 North Eastern Sea Fisheries Committee .................................................................................. 20 4 STOCK ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................... 22 4.1 MANAGEMENT UNIT .............................................................................................................. 22 4.2 MONITORING OF STOCK STATUS ......................................................................................... 22 4.3 MODELLING ............................................................................................................................ 23 4.4 MANAGEMENT ADVICE ......................................................................................................... 24 5 FISHERY MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 25 5.1 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................. 25 5.2 CONSULTATIVE PROCESS ....................................................................................................... 25 6 STANDARD USED ............................................................................................... 26 PRINCIPLE 1 ........................................................................................................................................... 26 PRINCIPLE 2 ........................................................................................................................................... 26 PRINCIPLE 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 27 802020 v6 Public Certification Report 7 BACKGROUND TO THE EVALUATION ........................................................ 29 7.1 EVALUATION TEAM ................................................................................................................ 29 7.2 PREVIOUS CERTIFICATION EVALUATIONS ........................................................................... 29 7.3 INSPECTIONS OF THE FISHERY ............................................................................................. 30 8 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION .................................................................. 31 8.1 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ........................................................................................... 31 8.2 STAKEHOLDER ISSUES ............................................................................................................ 31 9 OBSERVATIONS AND SCORING ..................................................................... 32 9.1 INTRODUCTION TO SCORING METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 32 9.2 EVALUATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................... 32 10 LIMIT OF IDENTIFICATION OF LANDINGS FROM THE FISHERY ...... 33 11 CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION ....................................................... 34 11.1 CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION ................................................................................... 34 11.2 SCOPE OF CERTIFICATION ..................................................................................................... 34 11.3 PRE-CONDITIONS, CONDITIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................ 34 11.3.1 Pre-Conditions ................................................................................................................... 34 11.3.2 Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 34 11.3.3 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 36 12 AGREEMENT ...................................................................................................... 37 12.1 APPLICANT'S AGREEMENT TO MEET SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. ....................................... 37 Appendices APPENDIX A: SCORING TABLE APPENDIX B: CLIENT ACTION PLAN APPENDIX C: PEER REVIEW REPORTS List of Tables and Figures Tables TABLE 1: PROPORTION MATURE AND MEAN WEIGHT AT AGE FOR SEA BASS (COMBINED SEXES) ................................... 7 TABLE 2: MEETINGS HELD DURING THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS.......................................................................................... 30 TABLE 3: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS HELD .................................................................................................................. 31 Figures FIGURE 1: DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF A INTERTIDAL SEA BASS NET ............................................................ 11 FIGURE 2: PHOTOGRAPH OF A FIXED NET SITE (A) ............................................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 3: PHOTOGRAPH OF A FIXED NET SITE (B) ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dicentrarchus Labrax)
    SCIENTIA MARINA 78(4) December 2014, 493-503, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN-L: 0214-8358 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03992.02C Fitness difference between cryptic salinity-related phenotypes of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Bruno Guinand 1,2, Nolwenn Quéré 1,2, Frédérique Cerqueira 1,3, Erick Desmarais 1,3, François Bonhomme 1,2 1 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR 5554 (Université Montpellier 2), cc65, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Station Méditerranéenne de l’Environnement Littoral, 2 Avenue des Chantiers, 34200 Sète, France. 3 LabEx CeMEB (Centre Méditerranéen Environnement Biodiversité), Université Montpellier II, place E. Bataillon, cc63, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Summary: The existence of cryptic salinity-related phenotypes has been hypothesized in the “euryhaline” sea bass (Dicen- trarchus labrax). How differential osmoregulation costs between freshwater and saltwater environments affect fitness and phenotypic variation is misunderstood in this species. During an experiment lasting around five months, we investigated changes in the whole body mass and in the expression of growth-related genes (insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]; growth hormone receptor [GHR]) in the intestine and the liver of sea bass thriving in sea water (SSW), successfully acclimated to freshwater (SFW), and unsuccessfully acclimated to freshwater (UFW). Albeit non-significant, a trend toward change in body mass was demonstrated among SSW, UFW and SFW fish, suggesting that SSW fish were a mixture of the other phe- notypes. Several mortality peaks were observed during the experiment, with batches of UFW fish showing higher expression in the osmoregulatory intestine due to down-regulation of genes in the liver and significant up-regulation of GHR in the intestine compared with SFW fish.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.3 3 Newsletter 3 Aquatt AQUAEXCEL 2020 Deliverable D4.3 3
    D4.3_3 Newsletter 3 AquaTT AQUAEXCEL 2020 Deliverable D4.3_3 Executive Summary Objectives The objective of the newsletter is to facilitate communication and dissemination of the AQUAEXCEL 2020 project ensuring a widespread awareness to all stakeholders. This third newsletter aims to communicate newest AQUAEXCEL 2020 research advances as well as its Transnational Access (TNA) and training course programme, and to introduce another one of the studied species in AQUAEXCEL 2020 and other information of interest. Rationale: AquaTT designed the newsletter following the brand identity of the project (logo, characterising project colours, etc). Content has been based on activities carried out in the project so far like events and research findings, the TNA programme, one of the aquaculture species and general information of interest. The draft newsletter was sent to all AQUAEXCEL 2020 partners to validate the content of the third newsletter. The final newsletter has been sent out to the project partners, stakeholder database contacts and any other interested individuals. The AQUAEXCEL 2020 project website and the collaborative platform will store the newsletter archive. Main Results: The third AQUAEXCEL 2020 newsletter is 8 pages long and features ‘AQUAEXCEL2020 News and Highlights’ like a success story from the TNA programme of AQUAEXCEL 2020 , new publications and feature promotional articles, as well as past events like the Industry & Research Advisory Panel (IRAP) meeting and upcoming events. Emphasis is on the major components of AQUAEXCEL 2020 , the ‘TNA programme’ including the featured success story, the next Calls for Access and a feature of a partner’s TNA facility, as well as an announcement of the ‘Training Courses’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Ecology of the Common Cuttlefish (Sepia Officinalis)
    Supporting Sustainable Sepia Stocks Report 1: The biology and ecology of the common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) Daniel Davies Kathryn Nelson Sussex IFCA 2018 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Biology ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Physical description ............................................................................................................................ 3 Locomotion and respiration ................................................................................................................ 4 Vision ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Chromatophores ................................................................................................................................. 5 Colour patterns ................................................................................................................................... 5 Ink sac and funnel organ
    [Show full text]
  • Largescale Mullet (Planiliza Macrolepis) Can Recover from Thermal Pollution-Induced Malformations
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Largescale mullet (Planiliza macrolepis) can recover from thermal pollution-induced malformations Yi Ta Shao1,2, Shang-Ying Chuang1, Hao-Yi Chang1, Yung-Che Tseng3, Kwang- Tsao Shao1,4* 1 Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, 2 Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, 3 Marine Research Station, Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 4 Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 It is well known in aquaculture that hyperthermic perturbations may cause skeleton malfor- mations in fish, but this phenomenon has rarely been documented in wild species. One rare location where thermal pollution has increased the proportion of malformed fish in OPEN ACCESS wild population is in the waters near the Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan. At this site, the threshold temperature and critical exposure time for inducing deformations have Citation: Shao YT, Chuang S-Y, Chang H-Y, Tseng Y-C, Shao K-T (2018) Largescale mullet (Planiliza not been previously determined. In addition, it was unclear whether juvenile fish with ther- macrolepis) can recover from thermal pollution- mal-induced malformations are able to recover when the temperature returns below the induced malformations. PLoS ONE 13(11): threshold. In the present study, juvenile largescale mullet (Planiliza macrolepis) were kept e0208005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. at temperatures ranging from 26ÊC and 36ÊC for 1±4 weeks, after which malformed fish pone.0208005 were maintained at a preferred temperature of 26ÊC for another 8 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranchs & Commercial Fisheries Around the British Isles
    Elasmobranchs & Commercial Fisheries around the British Isles: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics JOANA FERNANDES DA SILVA Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências do Mar 2009 JOANA FERNANDES DA SILVA Elasmobranchs & Commercial Fisheries around the British Isles: Spatial and Temporal dynamics Dissertação de Candidatura ao grau de Mestre em Ciências do Mar – Recursos Marinhos submetida ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. Orientador – Doutor Jim Ellis Categoria – Marine Ecologist Afiliação – Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) Co-orientadora – Doutora Ivone Figueiredo Categoria – Researcher Afiliação – Instituto das Pescas da Investigação e do Mar (INIAP/IPIMAR) Sumário executivo Os peixes elasmobrânquios desempenham um papel importante nos ecossistemas marinhos e as características dos seus ciclos de vida tornam-nos muito vulnearáveis à exploração comercial. Embora, existam algumas pescarias dirigidas a espécies de elasmobrânquios com carácter sazonal e/ou local ao largo das ilhas Britânicas, os elasmobrânquios são comunemente capturados em pescarias mistas demersais. A pescaria da palangre dirigida a espécies demersais é conhecida por ser altamente selectiva para certas espécies de elasmobrânquios, embora os padrões espaciais e temporais destas pescarias não tenham, ainda, sido descritos. Por conseguinte, uma descrição geral destas pescarias ao largo das ilhas britânicas foi conduzida. As principais zonas, em termos de desembarques na pescaria da palangre demersal (1990-2007) foram o sul do Mar do Norte (ICES IVc), Mar da Irlanda (VIIa) e Mar do Norte central (IVb). Enquanto que, as principais espécies capturadas nestas pescarias são o galhudo- malhado, bacalhau do Atlântico, raias e safio. Desde 2007, as capturas acessórias de raias no Mar do Norte têm uma quota de 25%, a qual foi revista recentemente, sendo apenas obrigatória para as embarcações com mais de 15 m de comprimento total (Regulamento CE n.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List of the Romanian Vertebrate Fauna
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 377–411 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0028-1 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE ROMANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA DUMITRU MURARIU Abstract. Compiling different bibliographical sources, a total of 732 taxa of specific and subspecific order remained. It is about the six large vertebrate classes of Romanian fauna. The first class (Cyclostomata) is represented by only four species, and Pisces (here considered super-class) – by 184 taxa. The rest of 544 taxa belong to Tetrapoda super-class which includes the other four vertebrate classes: Amphibia (20 taxa); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) and Mammalia (110 taxa). Résumé. Cette contribution à la systématique des vertébrés de Roumanie s’adresse à tous ceux qui sont intéressés par la zoologie en général et par la classification de ce groupe en spécial. Elle représente le début d’une thème de confrontation des opinions des spécialistes du domaine, ayant pour but final d’offrir aux élèves, aux étudiants, aux professeurs de biologie ainsi qu’à tous ceux intéressés, une synthèse actualisée de la classification des vertébrés de Roumanie. En compilant différentes sources bibliographiques, on a retenu un total de plus de 732 taxons d’ordre spécifique et sous-spécifique. Il s’agît des six grandes classes de vertébrés. La première classe (Cyclostomata) est représentée dans la faune de Roumanie par quatre espèces, tandis que Pisces (considérée ici au niveau de surclasse) l’est par 184 taxons. Le reste de 544 taxons font partie d’une autre surclasse (Tetrapoda) qui réunit les autres quatre classes de vertébrés: Amphibia (20 taxons); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) et Mammalia (110 taxons).
    [Show full text]
  • Alteration of Growth and Temperature Tolerance of European Sea Bass
    Turk. J. Fish.& Aquat. Sci. 20(5), 331-340 http://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v20_5_01 R E S E A R C H P A P E R Alteration of Growth and Temperature Tolerance of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax Linnaeus 1758) in Different Temperature and Salinity Combinations Hatice Asuman Yilmaz1,* , Serhat Turkmen2, Metin Kumlu1, Orhan Tufan 1 3 Eroldogan , Nafiye Perker 1Cukurova University, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, 01330 Balcali Adana, Turkey. 2 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Grupo de Investigación en Acuicultura (GIA), Transmontaña s/n, 35413 Arucas, Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. 3Mediterranean Fisheries Research Production and Training Institute, Kepez Unit, 07001 Antalya, Turkey. Article History Abstract Received 23 January 2019 Accepted 10 July 2019 This study was performed to assess the combined effects of three salinities (0, 20 and First Online 26 July 2019 38 ppt) and three acclimation temperatures (15, 20 and 25°C) on growth performance, proximate composition and thermal tolerance of European Sea Bass (32 g) inhabiting Corresponding Author southern parts of the Mediterranean Sea. Highest fish final weight (83.8 g) was achieved at 25°C in freshwater (FW). Specific growth rate (SGR) at 25°C was about Tel.: +903223386060 twice higher than that at 15°C, while 20°C promoted an intermediate growth. The fish E-mail: [email protected] cultured in FW at 25°C displayed consistently lower FCR and better SGR than those in full strength seawater (SW). Salinity had strong influence on fillet protein and lipid Keywords compositions. Highest lipid content (14.9%) was found in fish held in brackish water CTMin (20 ppt), and the fish held in SW had the lowest lipid content.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department National Aquaculture Sector Overview Morocco Replaced by: French version (2015) I. Characteristics, Structure And Resources Of The Sector IV. Trends, Issues And Development a. Summary V. References b. History And General Overview a. Bibliography c. Human Resources b. Related Links d. Cultured Species e. Practices/Systems Of Culture II. Sector Performance a. Production b. Market And Trade c. Contribution To The Economy III. Promotion And Management Of The Sector a. The Institutional Framework b. The Governing Regulations c. Applied Research, Education And Training Characteristics, structure and resources of the sector Summary In 2004, aquaculture production in Morocco was 1 690 tonnes, which only accounted for 0.19 percent of total national fish production. Marine aquaculture output was 788 tonnes, or 47 percent of aggregate national aquaculture production, mainly of European seabass and gilthead seabream which accounted for 91 percent of total production. These two species were being intensively farmed, in floating cages in the lagoons, and in open water. This kind of aquaculture had begun in the 1980s, but then it stagnated, and even declined, as a result of the steep collapse of European market prices and the winding-up of two aquaculture companies. At the present time, there are two aquaculture companies still operating along the Mediterranean coast. The production is almost entirely exported to Italy, Spain and France. In 2004, inland aquaculture produced 685 tonnes, or 40 percent of total national aquaculture production. It was largely dominated by the common carp, accounting for 88 percent of output.
    [Show full text]
  • Globefish European Fish Price Report
    Issue 5/2020 May 2020 Latest trends Index for prices Groundfish 9 The COVID-19 outbreak and the government measures Flatfish 10 introduced to reduce contagion risk are still overshadowing the Tuna 11 European seafood market. Most importers have stopped purchasing as most countries remain in varying states of Small Pelagics 11 lockdown. However, there are some signs of improvement in Cephalopods 12 the general situation, with restaurants reopening in several Crustaceans 13 European countries. In the meantime, the industry is adapting Bivalves 15 to the shifting market conditions by offering new ranges of Salmon 15 seafood retail products targeted at home-bound consumers. Trout 16 In response to the COVID-19 crisis, some countries have taken Freshwater fish 16 a more nationally focused approach to marketing, promoting Non Traditional fish sourced domestically over imports from other EU countries. Species 16 Sales of canned fish were exceptionally good in April but activity Seabass-Seabream- has slowed since, with canned tuna producers reporting normal Meagre 17 sales in May. Frozen tuna prices have fallen sharply over recent The European Fish Price Report, weeks, as plants are working at lower capacity due to COVID- based on information supplied by industry correspondents, aims to 19, but higher productivity has been reported in Ecuador. provide guidance on broad price trends. Price information is indicative and should be used only for forecasting GROUNDFISH medium- and long-term trends. FAO is not responsible for any errors or omissions. In the Russian Federation, observers are expecting a gradual decline in the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) for Alaska pollock by 5 percent per year until 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Aquaculture 287 (2009) 203–210 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Growth performance and osmoregulation in the shi drum (Umbrina cirrosa) adapted to different environmental salinities Constantinos C. Mylonas a,⁎, Michalis Pavlidis b, Nikos Papandroulakis a, Mario M. Zaiss a, Dimitris Tsafarakis a,b, Ioannis E. Papadakis a, Stamatis Varsamos c,1 a Institute of Aquaculture, Hellenic Center for Marine Research, P.O. Box 2214, Iraklion, Crete 71003, Greece b Department of Biology, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Iraklion, Crete 71409, Greece c Université Montpellier II, SkuldTech, CC 091, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: In order to investigate the ability of shi drum (Umbrina cirrosa) to be reared at diverse locations, growth and Received 30 November 2007 osmoregulatory performance were assessed at full-strength seawater (40 psu), nearly iso-osmotic water Received in revised form 12 October 2008 (10 psu) and low salinity water (4 psu).
    [Show full text]
  • Español English Français Abadejo Pollack Lieu Jaune Abadejo Dorado Golden Pollack Merluche Blanche Abichón Mediterranean Sand
    Español English Français abadejo pollack lieu jaune abadejo dorado golden pollack merluche blanche abichón Mediterranean sand smelt cabasson acevia solenette petit sole jaune ágono hook nose souris de mer águila marina eagle ray aigle commun águila moteada spotted eagle ray raie-léopard aguja garfish orphie aguja snake pipefish entélure aguja blanca Atlantic white marlin makaire blanc de l'Atlantique aguja de mar Nilson’s pipefish petite aiguille de mer aguja mula broad-nosed pipefish siphonostome aguja volona striped marlin marlin rayé albacora albacore germon alfonsito cardinalfish roi des rougets aligote axillary seabream pageot acarné alitán large-spotted dogfish grande roussette anchoa anchovy anchois anchoa de fondo pearlsides maurolique de Miller anchoa de Sudamérica South American pilchard pilchard sud-américain anchoa japonesa Japanese pilchard pilchard du Japon angelote smooth-back angelshark ange de mer ocellé angelote común angelshark ange de mer commun angelote del Pacífico sawback angelshark ange de mer épineux anguila European eel anguille anguila americana American eel anguille d’Amérique anguila común common eel anguille anguila japonesa Japanese eel anguille de japon anguila jardinera spotted garden eel anguille de jardin anjoba blue fish tassergal araña greater weever grand vive araña pequeña lesser weever petite vive arenque herring hareng de l'Atlantique arenque del Pacífico Pacific herring hareng du Pacifique atún rojo blue-fin tuna thon rouge babosa crestada shanny mordocet babosa de banda oscura striped blenny
    [Show full text]
  • The Striped Bass Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States
    The Stri1Jecl Ba~s Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, U 11ited States: A Regional Ma11agement Plan 2006 Revisio11 Gttlf States ~'larine Fisheries Commissio11 I\.Im·ch 2006 fliumber l Ji Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator Butch Gautreaux Barnett Lawley, Commissioner 1015 Clothilde Avenue Alabama Department of Conservation Morgan City, LA 70380 and Natural Resources 64 North Union Street Mr. Wilson Gaidry Montgomery, AL 36130-1901 8911 Park Avenue Proxy: Houma, LA 70363 Vernon Minton, Director Alabama Marine Resources Division MISSISSIPPI P.O. Drawer 458 William Walker, Executive Director Gulf Shores, AL 36547 Mississippi Department of Marine Resources 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 Senator Gary G. Tanner Biloxi, MS 39530 5750 McDonald Road Proxy: Theodore, AL 36582 William S. “Corky” Perret Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Chris Nelson 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Biloxi, MS 39530 P.O. Box 60 Bon Secour, AL 36511 Senator Tommy Gollott 235 Bay View Avenue FLORIDA Biloxi, MS 39530 Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Mr. Joe Gill Jr. 620 South Meridian Street Joe Gill Consulting, LLC Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 P.O. Box 535 Proxy: Ocean Springs, MS 39566-0535 Virginia Vail FWC Division of Marine Fisheries TEXAS 620 South Meridian Street Robert L. Cook, Executive Director Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road Senator Nancy Argenziano Austin, TX 78744 1120 North Suncoast Boulevard Proxy Crystal River, FL 34429 Mike Ray Coastal Fisheries Division Hayden R. Dempsey Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
    [Show full text]