Comprehensive

(Official Journal of the American Psychopathological Association) VOL. 40, NO. 3 MAY/JUNE 1999

The History of Electroconvulsive Therapy in the United States and Its Place in American Psychiatry: A Personal Memoir

Zigmond M. Lebensohn

The history of electroconvulsive therapy [ECT) in the uted to an ambivalent relationship between ECT and United States is traced from its crude beginnings in the rest of American psychiatry. The media coverage 1940 to its emergence as a highly sophisticated and of ECT is reviewed, and suggestions for dealing with effective treatment for many severe psychiatric disor- the antipsychiatry movement and anti-ECT prejudice ders. The general distrust of all somatic therapies in are discussed. the 1930s and 1940s expressed by many prominent Copyright© 1999by W.B. Saunders Company (both analysts and nonanalysts) contrib-

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRY BEFORE ECT approach to treatment was psychological, support- r~HE HISTORY OF electroconvulsive therapy ive or custodial. There was general distrust of 1. (ECT) in the United States cannot be com- somatic therapies for the functional disorders. pletely understood without knowing something The chief exception was the Sodium Amytal about the history and character of American Psychia- Interview introduced in the 1920s, which often try from its European roots to the evolution of its enabled mute catatonics to speak under its influ- uniquely American style. ence. Unfortunately, the long-term results were disappointing. Equally disappointing had been the In colonial days and for many years thereafter, introduction of "Dauerschlaf' (1922) by the Swiss the only psychiatry known in the United States was Klaesi, 2 which consisted of administer- mental hospital psychiatry. We borrowed heavily ing large amounts of over a long from the Tukes and the Quaker retreats in England, period, thus placing the patient in a state of mild but in the early 1800s, American psychiatrists intoxication until such time as he was developed a system of "moral treatment" that permitted to awaken and presumably resume his elicited praise and admiration from many including more normal activities. Because of the frequency of the famous novelist Charles Dickens, ~ who de- pneumonia and the poor success rate, this treatment scribed his visit to the Boston Psychopathic Hospi- never gained acceptance and was soon abandoned. tal in 1842 in glowing prose. Shortly thereafter, the The first of the somatic therapies used to treat a flood of immigration to our shores plus the increase then-major was the malarial therapy in our population overburdened and overwhelmed for general paresis (1918) for which Professor the state hospital systems and the quality of care Wagner von Jauregg 3 of Vienna was awarded the deteriorated. Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1927. However, the In April 1938, when ECT was first used in Italy, general distrust and dislike of somatic therapies by the state hospitals in this country were still over- crowded and grossly understaffed. The only medi- cations available were sedatives, chiefly in the form Dr Lebensohn is Chief-Emeritus, Department of Psychiatry, of barbiturates, bromides, paraldehyde, and chloral Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington; and Clinical Professor hydrate. Theelin injection was occasionally used of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, (with equivocal results) for menopausal depres- Washington, DC. sions. Hydrotherapy with cold packs, continuous Address reprint requests to Zigmond M. Lebensohn, MD, 4840 Hutchins PI, NW Washington, DC 2000Z tub baths, and Scotch douches were a mainstay of Copyright © 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company most state hospital treatment. However, the major 0010-440X/99/4003-0004510.00/0

Comprehensive Psychiatry, Vol. 40, No. 3 (May/June), 1999: pp 173-181 173 174 ZIGMOND M. LEBENSOHN

many psychiatrists in the United States extended SOMATIC THERAPIES OF THE 1930s even to such a clearly organic disorder. It should be noted that all of the somatic An excellent example of this attitude was given therapies for the major mental disorders had their to me by Joseph Wortis of New York (personal origins in Europe, mostly in the 1930s, and were communication, July 1984), who (in 1937) invited rapidly introduced, accepted, and in many cases Professor Adolf Meyer, then Psychiatrist-in-Chief modified and improved in the United States. It at Johns Hopkins University Hospital and one of should also be noted that the theoretical underpin- the great leaders of American Psychiatry, to partici- nings for these treatments were often erroneous and pate in a major meeting on shock therapy unsophisticated in light of our present knowledge sponsored by the New York Academy of Medicine. of brain physiology. Dr. Meyer finally accepted the invitation but with The four major somatic therapies are listed marked ambivalence, as indicated by the following below in chronological order of discovery. excerpt from his acceptance letter: Dear Dr. Wortis: 1933: Insulin Shock Therapy There are two extremes in the attempts to play the savior role in psychiatry; work at the root--which is evidently not This was introduced by the Austrian, Manfred Insulin work--and importations which have next to noth- Sakel, 4 who (influenced by his observation on ing specific to do with psychiatry but exploit the patient and withdrawal symptoms in drug addicts) thought that resources through and for imported interests; and this is the an increased level of adrenaline was responsible for case of Insulin. I am always sorry to see the latter get on top. Whenever it does my interest wanes. I have allowed many mental symptoms and that insulin could be the paresis problem to pass into the domain of the Lues used as a biological antagonist to adrenaline. After department because Paresis is a 'dirty' experiment of a wave of enthusiastic acceptance in this country nature without localizing or any other control being (roughly 1936 to 1946), the treatment fell into possible. I am willing to leave it to the spirochaetist [sic]. disuse largely because it was so cumbersome, And with Insulin we deal with even more of an importation apt to divert the attention completely from the illness by costly, and relatively ineffective. absorbing the attention in the direction of something The general distrust of somatic therapies for the pharmaceutical. so-called "functional" disorders was again clearly apparent when insulin therapy was first introduced Another factor contributing to the bias against in the United States by Joseph Wortis 5 and Bernard somatic therapies (particularly ECT) has been the Glueck. 6 dominance of psychoanalytic theory in most medi- In 1936, Dr. William A. White, then superinten- cal schools and psychiatric training centers. This dent of St. Elizabeths, showed no enthusiasm for dominance began at the end of World War II ahd insulin, but by February 1937, he was no longer lasted until the mid 1990s, when it began to wane. able to resist the pressure from his staff and he Little attention was given to teaching students the invited Dr. Sakel to give a speech on "Hypoglyce- indications and contraindications for ECT. Many mia Therapy." Dr. Wortis accompanied Dr. Sakel psychiatrists would take, and pass, specialty board on this visit as interpreter and cicerone. Dr. Wortis' examinations without having witnessed, much less comments on what happened are revealing: administered, an ECT. The attitude toward ECT displayed by many teaching psychiatrists and psy- At St. Elizabeths I remember how William Alanson White choanalysts varied from overt antagonism to smug fretted while his staff besieged Sakel with questions. There condescension. The psychiatrist who still adminis- was a politely hospitable but constrained luncheon, and when White then escorted us to the gate Sakel clicked his tered ECT was often viewed with the same gaze heels in Central European style, bowed, put forth his hand that gynecologists used to reserve for their col- and said, in halting English, 'Dr. White, I wish to thank you leagues who performed abortions in the days before for your hostility.' (Personal communication, July 1984.) legalization. In some centers, a double standard seemed to exist. I have known analysts who 1934: Metrazol Convulsive Therapy condemn ECT in public but who have privately This was introduced by the Hungarian psychia- recommended it for individual patients and even trist, Ladislaus von Meduna, 7 who thought there for members of their own family. Even after the was a biological antagonism between schizophre- patient has made a good recovery with ECT, they nia and epilepsy. Others had observed dramatic often manifest a curious lack of interest in the case. improvements in schizophrenics who experienced