DOCSLIB.ORG

Atcm8 Att001 E.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atcm8 Att001 E.Pdf ,. CREDITS Cover and Cartography by : Rose Grove~ Photographs by: A.S. Chapman, J.A. Raymond and E.L. Hor eth (USCG ) ·JOPY OF OOGUM~NT Ai SCOTT POLAR ~ESEARCH lNSTlTUTE CAMBRIDGE --- -·-- ··•·----·- ----- TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations "ii Executive Summary iii General 1 Personnel 2 Itinerary 2 Logistics 3 Procedure 3 Observations 4 ,- Leningradskaya 4 Dumont d'Urville 6 ~- Casey 9 _ Mirniy 13 -- Davis 15 / Mawson 18 Molodezhnaya 22 - Showa 25 - Novolazarevskaya 28 ✓- SANAE III 31 -/ Georg von Neumayer 34 / Halley 37 General Belgrano II 41 / ~ Vice Comodoro Marambio 43 Additional Observations 46 Summary & Conclusions 48 Addendum 48 Acknowledgments 48 REPORT OF UNITED STATES OBSERVER TEAM IN ANTARCTICA 1983 Executive Summarv In addition to promoting freedom of scientific inquiry and the exchange of scientific information, the Antarctic Tceaty pro­ hibits activities of a militacy natuce, nuclear explosions, and the disposal of radioactive waste in Antacctica. To ensure the observance of these principles, Acticle VII of the Treaty provides that each of the Consultative Parties may designate observers who shall have complete freedom of access at any time to any or all aceas of Antarctica. During the peciod January 17 to Macch 10, 1983, a team of four U.S. nationals was in Antarctica to carry out the seventh U.S. inspection of foreign research stations since the Treaty came into force in 1961. These were mostly in Eastern Antarc­ tica, a part of the continent which had not been effectively visited by a U.S. Observer Team since 1967. The Team operated fcom the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter POLAR STAR, which was dedicated primarily to this mission . The tour was accomplished on a west­ ward ciccumnavigation of Antarctica fcom McMurdo Station to Palmer Station, both U.S. coastal research bases. Owing to the outstanding capabilities of the icebceaker and the professionalism of its crew -- and extraordinarily favorable ice and weather conditions -- the Team was able to visit fourteen stationso These included four Soviet, three Australian, two Ar­ gentine, and one each French, Japanese, South African, West ·German, and British stations. Four of these stations had nevec been visited previously by a U.S. Observec Team, and the changes at the other stations wece substantial. In addition, the Team met briefly with personnel of the ships· bearing the Indian and West German Antacctic expeditions and learned of the research programs of those countries. The Observer Team found that all nations visited were com­ plying with both the provisions and the spirit of the Antarctic Treaty and its (~greed measures./ --~--- --- - -- · - -..__. ·-- · - . _. """I::- . - ----- - -· -- - -- . - -- - . _.,,/ ..- ·' ii -- ----- ------ - - - _ ., - _____ .,,_, __ _ List of Illustrations MAP Cruise Track Polar Star Pg. 1a Fig 1 USCG Cutter Polar Star 2a 2 Leningradskaya - Aerial View 3a 3 Leningradskaya - Dormitory and Scientific Building 4a 4 Dumont d' Urville - Aerial View 5a 5 Original Casey Station Sa 6 Observer Team Chief Chapman at Casey Station 9a 7 Radio Operator - Molodezhnaya 12a 8 New Construction - Davis Station 15a 9 Milodezhnaya - Chief, Wintering-Over 27th Soviet Antarctic Expedition Galkin with Observer Teams Memb ers 22a 10 Showa Station - Aerial View 25a: 1 1 Showa Station - New Laboratory Bldg 2q_a---- - . 12 Novolazarevskaya - Aerial View 27a 13 DDR Research Center 28a / 14 SANAE III Agove - Ground Meteorological Station 31a 15 SANAE III - Dining Facility 32a 16 Goerg Von Neumayer - Aerial View 33a 17 Halley Station - New Base Under Construction 36a 18 General Belgrano II - Headquarters & Dormitory 41a 19 Vice Comodoro Marambia - Aerial View 42a 20 U.S.C.G. Helicopter at Marambio 43a 21 Second Indian Antarctic Expedition 46a 22 FRG Polar Research Vessel - POLARSTERN 47a iii REPORT OF UNITED STATES OBSERVER TEAM IN ANTARCTICA 1983 I. General This is a report on visits to selected foreign research stations in Antarctica by a team of United States observers as provided under Article VII of the Antacctic Treaty. The fact that the Government of the United States would furnish seven weeks out of the schedule of one of its most modern and powerful icebreakers foe the endeavor requires an explanation. The 1957-58 International Geophysical Year (IGY) was a major international scientific effoct which, among other accom­ plishments, ficmly established the principle of free access throughout Antarctica foe scientific purposes. The twelve na­ tions active in Antarctica during the IGY believed that the in­ formal international arrangements of the IGY wece so successful and such a substantial contribution to peace in the area that they sought to perpetuate, formalize, and enlarge on them. Following protracted negotiations in Washington, D.C., the Ant­ arctic Treaty was signed December 1, 1959. Ratification by the twelve governments followed soon thereafter, and the Treaty en­ tered into force June 23, 1961. The Antarctic Treaty establishes a basis foe international cooperation in Antarctica. It reserves Antarctica exclusively for peaceful purposes and prohibits any measures of a military natuce in the region. Nuclear explosions and disposal of radio­ active waste in Antarctica are prohibited. The Treaty promotes international scientific cooperation in Antarctica, specifically through exchange of information regarding plans for research pro­ grams, exchange of scientists among expeditions and stations, and exchange of scientific observations and results. Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty establishes procedures to promote the objectives and ensure observance of the provi­ sions of the Treaty. These aims are to be accomplished by means of onsite inspections by duly designated observers. Article VII provides that Consultative Parties may designate nationals of their countries as observers and so inform the other Consultative Parties. Observers designated in this way are to have complete freedom of access at any time to any or all areas of Antarctica. This free access specifically includes ships and aircraft at points of discharging or embarking cargoes or personnel as well as all stations, installations, and equipment in Antarctica. Aerial observation within Antarctica may also be carried out at any time. 60° 60° 90° WJ--------~i -----··· ------1 90 ° E P> ® vostok (U.S.S.A.) 120° CnBlse Track of ihe USCG Cutter POLAR Sl'AR ,, 150° 180 ° 150° - 2 - The obsecvation function is an important element in the vitality of the Antarctic Treaty system. The United States, therefore, f~om time to time exercises the right to designate official observers undec the Antarctic Tceaty. Teams of U.S. obsecvecs have been sent to Antacctica at fairly regulac intec­ vals since the Tceaty came into force. The 1983 visit was the seventh in the series, the preceding one having taken place in 1980. I I. Pe csonnel The 1983 United States Observec Team consisted of four U.S. nationals designated as U.S. Antacctic Obsecvers by the Under­ secretacy of State foe Secucity Assistance, Science, and Techno­ logy. The following individuals compcised the U.S. observer Team: Dr. Albect S. Chapman , U.Sc Depactment of State Mc. Ronald A. Gaiduk, U.S. Department of State CDR. Macia Kazanowska, United States Navy COL. John A. Raymond, U.S. Acms Contcol and Dis~cmament Agency Pucsuant to Acticle VII of t he Treaty, the Department of State notified the Consultative Pacties of these designations by dip­ lomatic note dated Decemb er 9, 1982. I II. Itinecary The U.S. Observer Team was in Antarctica fcom Januacy 17 to March 10, 1983. Aftec an initial orientation period which in­ cluded informal visits to McMurdo and Amundsen-Scott stations, the itineca.cy developed as follows: Date Station Countcy January 25 Leningradskaya Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Januacy 28 Dumont d'Ucville Fcance Januacy 31 Casey Australia February 2 Mi.cniy (Mi.cnyy) Union of Soviet Socialist Republics February 4 Davis Australia Febcuacy 7 Mawson Australia Febcuary 9 Molodezhnaya Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 22.. e. Fig 1 USCG Cutter Polar Star ----·- --- ----- -· - ·---· ·----- - 3 - Date Station Country Febcuacy 10 Showa (Syowa) Japan Febcuary 13 Novolazacevskaya Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Feb.cua.cy 15 SANAE III Republic of South P..fcica Februacy 16 Georg von Neumayec Federal Republic of Gecmany Febcuary 18 Halley United Kingdom February 19 Genecal Belgrano II Argentina March 3 Vicecomodoro Marambio Argentina The observation touc closed with a call at Palme.c Station of the U.S. on March 6. IV. Logistics These visits wece made possible through the capabilities of the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter POLAR STAR in the course of a west- wacd circumnavigation of Antarctica from McMu.cdo Station to Palmer Station. The POLAR STAR, benefitting from an extraordinary span of benign weather, was able to penetrate coastal ice to within helicoptec or small boat cange of all stations it approached. With two helicopters, boats and other facilities, the vessel pro­ vided an admirable moving base fo.c the Observer Team. Consequently, no untoward bu.eden was placed on the facilities of the host sta­ tions~ and the visits did not, it is hoped, unduly disrupt thei.c routines oc strain theic capabilities. V. P.cocec.ure The visits we.ce undertaken to assuce the observance and to promote the objectives of the Antarctic Tceaty. The Team also looked fo.c compliance with ag.ceed measuces stemming fcom cecom­ mendations of the Antarctic T.ceaty Consultative Meetings. The Obse.cve.c Team accordingly sought to be comprehensive though___ not intrusive. In discussions with station pecsonnel, the scope and objectives of activities were elicited. Facilities, equipment, instruments, and supplies we.ce examined and photographed in suf­ ficient detail to determine genecal use oc intended purpose. The Team made a special effort to tou.c and understand the functions of any new construction taking place. Ground and aerial obser­ vations were made of each station. In many instances, station personnel appeared to be unaware that the U.S. intended to send an observer team to Antarctica - 3C.- - ,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Depositional Settings of the Basal López De Bertodano Formation, Maastrichtian, Antarctica
    Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 62 (4): 521-529 (2007) 521 DEPOSITIONAL SETTINGS OF THE BASAL LÓPEZ DE BERTODANO FORMATION, MAASTRICHTIAN, ANTARCTICA Eduardo B. OLIVERO1, Juan J. PONCE1, Claudia A. MARSICANO2, and Daniel R. MARTINIONI1 ¹ Laboratorio de Geología Andina, CADIC-CONICET, B. Houssay 200, CC 92, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Dpto. Cs. Geológicas, Universidad Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria Pab. II, C1428 DHE Buenos Aires. ABSTRACT: In Snow Hill and Seymour islands the lower Maastrichtian, basal part of the López de Bertodano Formation, rests on a high relief, erosi- ve surface elaborated in the underlying Snow Hill Island Formation. Mudstone-dominated beds with inclined heterolithic stratification dominate the basal strata of the López de Bertodano Formation. They consist of rhythmical alternations of friable sandy- and clayey- mudstone couplets, with ripple cross lamination, mud drapes, and flaser bedding. They are characterized by a marked lenticular geometry, reflecting the filling of tide-influenced channels of various scales and paleogeographic positions within a tide-dominated embayment or estuary. Major, sand-rich channel fills, up to 50-m thick, bounded by erosive surfaces probably represent inlets, located on a more central position in the estuary. Minor channel fills, 1- to 3-m thick, associated with offlapping packages with inclined heterolithic stratification pro- bably represent the lateral accretion of point bars adjacent to migrating tidal channels in the upper estuary. Both types of channel fills bear relatively abundant marine fauna, are intensively bioturbated, and are interpreted as a network of subtidal channels. In southwestern Snow Hill Island, the minor offlapping packages have scarce marine fossils and bear aligned depressions interpreted as poor preserved dinosaur footprints.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition
    FEDERAL SERVICE OF RUSSIA FOR HYDROMETEOROLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING State Institution “Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition QUARTERLY BULLETIN ʋ2 (51) April - June 2010 STATE OF ANTARCTIC ENVIRONMENT Operational data of Russian Antarctic stations St. Petersburg 2010 FEDERAL SERVICE OF RUSSIA FOR HYDROMETEOROLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING State Institution “Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute” Russian Antarctic Expedition QUARTERLY BULLETIN ʋ2 (51) April - June 2010 STATE OF ANTARCTIC ENVIRONMENT Operational data of Russian Antarctic stations Edited by V.V. Lukin St. Petersburg 2010 Editor-in-Chief - M.O. Krichak (Russian Antarctic Expedition –RAE) Authors and contributors Section 1 M. O. Krichak (RAE), Section 2 Ye. I. Aleksandrov (Department of Meteorology) Section 3 G. Ye. Ryabkov (Department of Long-Range Weather Forecasting) Section 4 A. I. Korotkov (Department of Ice Regime and Forecasting) Section 5 Ye. Ye. Sibir (Department of Meteorology) Section 6 I. V. Moskvin, Yu.G.Turbin (Department of Geophysics) Section 7 V. V. Lukin (RAE) Section 8 B. R. Mavlyudov (RAS IG) Section 9 V. L. Martyanov (RAE) Translated by I.I. Solovieva http://www.aari.aq/, Antarctic Research and Russian Antarctic Expedition, Reports and Glossaries, Quarterly Bulletin. Acknowledgements: Russian Antarctic Expedition is grateful to all AARI staff for participation and help in preparing this Bulletin. For more information about the contents of this publication, please, contact Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute of Roshydromet Russian Antarctic Expedition Bering St., 38, St. Petersburg 199397 Russia Phone: (812) 352 15 41; 337 31 04 Fax: (812) 337 31 86 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS PREFACE……………………….…………………………………….………………………….1 1. DATA OF AEROMETEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS AT THE RUSSIAN ANTARCTIC STATIONS…………………………………….…………………………3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica
    Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica Sergey Tarasenko Supervisor: Neil Gilbert GCAS 2008/2009 Table of content Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 1 Basic principles of wastewater treatment for small objects .....................................................5 1.1 Domestic wastewater characteristics....................................................................................5 1.2 Characteristics of main methods of domestic wastewater treatment .............................5 1.3 Designing of treatment facilities for individual sewage disposal systems...................11 2 Wastewater treatment in Antarctica..........................................................................................13 2.1 Problems of transferring treatment technologies to Antarctica .....................................13 2.1.1 Requirements of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Wastewater quality standards ...................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Geographical situation......................................................................................................14 2.1.2.1 Climatic conditions....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Polar Programs
    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the 'Infrastructure PM' Can't Give Antarctica the Cold Shoulder
    Please do not remove this page Why the ‘infrastructure PM’ can’t give Antarctica the cold shoulder McCallum, Adrian B https://research.usc.edu.au/discovery/delivery/61USC_INST:ResearchRepository/12126045700002621?l#13127312320002621 McCallum, A. B. (2013). Why the “infrastructure PM” can’t give Antarctica the cold shoulder. The Conversation, 5 December 2013. https://research.usc.edu.au/discovery/fulldisplay/alma99448982602621/61USC_INST:ResearchRepository Document Type: Published Version USC Research Bank: https://research.usc.edu.au [email protected] CC BY V4.0 Copyright © 2013 The Conversation Media Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Downloaded On 2021/10/02 23:37:22 +1000 Please do not remove this page 26/02/2016 Why the 'infrastructure PM' can't give Antarctica the cold shoulder Why the ‘infrastructure PM’ can’t give Antarctica the cold shoulder December 6, 2013 6.35am AEDT Tractors and quad bikes – seen here at Australia’s Mawson Station – are only two of many forms of transport used in Antarctica. Chris Wilson/Australian Antarctic Division Adrian McCallum Lecturer in Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast Prime Minister Tony Abbott recently declared that he wanted to be known as the “infrastructure prime minister”. But what of Australia’s iciest infrastructure – that located in Antarctica? A 20­year strategic plan for Australia’s Antarctic future was recently commissioned by the federal government, but it will be another six months before Tony Press, ex­director of the Australian Antarctic Division, reveals his “blueprint”. So what is best practice when it comes to polar infrastructure, and where should Australia be heading to maintain our status as a leader in Antarctic science and operations? Stations The British Antarctic Survey completed construction of their new Halley VI Station on the floating Brunt Ice Shelf, atop the Weddell Sea, East Antarctica in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)
    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) An English-born Post Office technician, Robin Hodgson, wearing a borrowed kilt, plays his pipes to huskies on the sea ice below Scott Base. So far he has had a cool response to his music from his New Zealand colleagues, and a noisy reception f r o m a l l 2 0 h u s k i e s . , „ _ . Antarctic Division photo Registered at Post Ollice Headquarters. Wellington. New Zealand, as a magazine. II '1.7 ^ I -!^I*"JTr -.*><\\>! »7^7 mm SOUTH GEORGIA, SOUTH SANDWICH Is- . C I R C L E / SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ /o Orcadas arg Sanae s a Noydiazarevskaya ussr FALKLAND Is /6Signyl.uK , .60"W / SOUTH AMERICA tf Borga / S A A - S O U T H « A WEDDELL SHETLAND^fU / I s / Halley Bav3 MINING MAU0 LAN0 ENOERBY J /SEA uk'/COATS Ld / LAND T> ANTARCTIC ••?l\W Dr^hnaya^^General Belgrano arg / V ^ M a w s o n \ MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ '■ aust \ /PENINSULA' *\4- (see map betowi jrV^ Sobldl ARG 90-w {■ — Siple USA j. Amundsen-Scott / queen MARY LAND {Mirny ELLSWORTH" LAND 1, 1 1 °Vostok ussr MARIE BYRD L LAND WILKES LAND ouiiiv_. , ROSS|NZJ Y/lnda^Z / SEA I#V/VICTORIA .TERRE , **•»./ LAND \ /"AOELIE-V Leningradskaya .V USSR,-'' \ --- — -"'BALLENYIj ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Tenitnte Matianzo arg 2 Esptrarua arg 3 Almirarrta Brown arc 4PttrtlAHG 5 Otcipcion arg 6 Vtcecomodoro Marambio arg * ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 1000 Miles 9 Prasid«fTtB Frei chile s 1000 Kilometres 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • Hnitflrcitilc
    HNiTflRCiTilC A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) ,m — i * Halley, the British Antarctic Survey's station on the Brunt Ice Shelf, Coats Land,, was rebuilt last season for the third time since 1956-57. This picture taken in March shows one of the four wooden tubes, each of which houses a two-storey building, under construction in a pre-shaped and compacted snow hollow. BAS Copyngh! Registered at Post Office Headquarters, Vol. 10, No. 2 Wellington, New Zealand, as a magazine. SOUTH GEORGIA -.. SOUTH SANDWICH Is «C*2K SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ 6SignyluK //o Orcadas arg SOUTH AMERICA / /\ ^ Borga T"^00Molodezhnaya \^' 4 south , * /weooEii \ ft SA ' r-\ *r\USSR --A if SHETLAND ,J£ / / ^^Jf ORONMIIDROWNING MAUD LAND' E N D E R B Y \ ] > * \ /' _ "iV**VlX" JN- S VDruzhnaya/General /SfA/ S f Auk/COATS ' " y C O A TBelirano SLd L d l arg L A N D p r \ ' — V&^y D««hjiaya/cenera.1 Beld ANTARCTIC •^W^fCN, uSS- fi?^^ /K\ Mawson \ MAC ROBERTSON LAN0\ \ *usi \ /PENINSULA' ^V^/^CRp^e J ^Vf (set mjp Mow) C^j V^^W^gSobralARG - Davis aust L Siple USA Amundsen-Scon OUEEN MARY LAND flMimy ELLSWORTH , U S A / ^ U S S R ') LAND °Vos1okussR/ r». / f c i i \ \ MARIE BYRO fee Shelf V\ . IAND WILKES LAND Scon ROSS|N2i? SEA jp>r/VICTORIAIj^V .TERRE ,; ' v / I ALAND n n \ \^S/ »ADEUL. n f i i f / / GEORGE V Ld .m^t Dumom d'Urville iranu Leningradskayra V' USSR,.'' \ -------"'•BAlLENYIs^ ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Teniente Matienzo arc 2 Esperanza arg 3 Almirante Brown arg 4 Petrel arg 5 Decepcion arg 6 Vicecomodoro Marambio arg ' ANTARCTICA 7 Ariuro Prat chile 500 1000 Miles 8 Bernardo O'Higgms chile 9 Presidente Frei chile - • 1000 Kilomnre 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Harding, Grove Mountains, East Antarctica
    MEASURE 2 - ANNEX Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 168 MOUNT HARDING, GROVE MOUNTAINS, EAST ANTARCTICA 1. Introduction The Grove Mountains (72o20’-73o10’S, 73o50’-75o40’E) are located approximately 400km inland (south) of the Larsemann Hills in Princess Elizabeth Land, East Antarctica, on the eastern bank of the Lambert Rift(Map A). Mount Harding (72°512 -72°572 S, 74°532 -75°122 E) is the largest mount around Grove Mountains region, and located in the core area of the Grove Mountains that presents a ridge-valley physiognomies consisting of nunataks, trending NNE-SSW and is 200m above the surface of blue ice (Map B). The primary reason for designation of the Area as an Antarctic Specially Protected Area is to protect the unique geomorphological features of the area for scientific research on the evolutionary history of East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS), while widening the category in the Antarctic protected areas system. Research on the evolutionary history of EAIS plays an important role in reconstructing the past climatic evolution in global scale. Up to now, a key constraint on the understanding of the EAIS behaviour remains the lack of direct evidence of ice sheet surface levels for constraining ice sheet models during known glacial maxima and minima in the post-14 Ma period. The remains of the fluctuation of ice sheet surface preserved around Mount Harding, will most probably provide the precious direct evidences for reconstructing the EAIS behaviour. There are glacial erosion and wind-erosion physiognomies which are rare in nature and extremely vulnerable, such as the ice-core pyramid, the ventifact, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabirds of Human Settlements in Antarctica: a Case Study of the Mirny Station
    CZECH POLAR REPORTS 11 (1): 98-113, 2021 Seabirds of human settlements in Antarctica: A case study of the Mirny Station Sergey Golubev Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Nekouzskii raion, Yaroslavl oblast, 152742, Russia Abstract Antarctica is free of urbanisation, however, 40 year-round and 32 seasonal Antarctic stations operate there. The effects of such human settlements on Antarctic wildlife are insufficiently studied. The main aim of this study was to determine the organization of the bird population of the Mirny Station. The birds were observed on the coast of the Davis Sea in the Mirny (East Antarctica) from January 8, 2012 to January 7, 2013 and from January 9, 2015 to January 9, 2016. The observations were carried out mainly on the Radio and Komsomolsky nunataks (an area of about 0.5 km²). The duration of observations varied from 1 to 8 hours per day. From 1956 to 2016, 13 non-breeding bird species (orders Sphenisciformes, Procellariiformes, Charadriiformes) were recorded in the Mirny. The South polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) and Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) form the basis of the bird population. South polar skuas are most frequently recorded at the station. Less common are Brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi) and Adélie penguins. Adélie penguins, Wilson's storm petrels (Oceanites oceanicus), South polar and Brown skuas are seasonal residents, the other species are visitors. Adélie penguins, Emperor (Aptenodytes forsteri), Macaroni (Eudyptes chrysolophus) and Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica), Wilson's storm petrels, South polar and Brown skuas interacted with the station environment, using it for com- fortable behavior, feeding, molting, shelter from bad weather conditions, and possible breeding.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMBER COUNTRY: Russia National Report to SCAR for Year: 2008-09 Activity Contact Name Address Telephone Fax Email Web Site
    MEMBER COUNTRY: Russia National Report to SCAR for year: 2008-09 Activity Contact Name Address Telephone Fax Email web site National SCAR Committee SCAR Delegates Russian National Committee on Antarctic Research Institute of Geography, Staromonetny per.29, 1) Delegate V.M.Kotlyakov 109017 Moskow, Russia 74,959,590,032 74,959,590,033 [email protected] Russian National Committee on Antarctic Research Institute of Geography, Staromonetny per.29, 2) Alternate Delegate M.Yu.Moskalev-sky 109017 Moskow, Russia 74,959,590,032 74,959,590,033 [email protected] Standing Scientific Groups Life Sciences Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nakhimovsky prosp.36, Delegate Melnikov Igor 117852 Moscow, Russia 74951292018 74951245983 [email protected] www.paiceh.ru Geosciences VNIIOkeangeologia, Angliysky Ave, 1, Leitchenkov 190121 St.Petersburg, Delegate German Russia 78123123551 78127141470 [email protected] Physical Sciences Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute Ul.Beringa, 38, Klepikov 199226 St.Petersburg, 78123522827 Delegate Aleksander Russia 78123520226 78123522688 [email protected] www.aari.aq 1 Activity Contact Name Address Telephone Fax Email web site Scientific Research Program ACE None AGCS Delegate Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute Ul.Beringa, 38, Klepikov 199226 St.Petersburg, 1) Aleksander Russia 78123520226 78123522688 [email protected] www.aari.ru Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute Ul.Beringa, 38, 199226 St.Petersburg, 2) LagunVictor Russia 78123522950 78123522688 [email protected] www.aari.aq EBA None ICESTAR
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]