Irish Political Review, February, 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Irish Political Review, February, 2012 Iran's Bomb? Raymond Crotty's Mondragon. Part 4 David Morrison Appeal To England Labour Comment page 8 page 12 back page IRISH POLITICAL REVIEW February 2012 Vol.27, No.2 ISSN 0790-7672 and Northern Star incorporating Workers' Weekly Vol.26 No.2 ISSN 954-5891 The Euro The Right To Desert Realities And "Minister for Defence, Alan Shatter, has said that serious examination is taking place Abstractions into the possible pardoning of Irish soldiers who deserted from the Defence forces to fight for the Allies in World War 2. Speaking on Morning Ireland Minister Shatter said these Recent developments to secure the soldiers had fought against fascism and contributed to the future of freedom and Euro, and the new inter-Governmental democracy in Europe. He said they were penalised by a regulation barring them from being arrangements to do so, have left our EU- employed in any public service job. He welcomed the passing of a motion in the Stormont ophiles talking and writing the most awful Assembly earlier this week calling for a pardon for the soldiers. Minister Shatter said he rubbish. The EU has had to be cast aside believes that it is right that the Republic of Ireland now revisit how this issue was dealt with as ineffective and now the EU structure is historically" (RTE Online, 25 January). being used by the British Government as The motion at Stormont not only demanded that the deserters to the enemy should be the best way to prevent the Euro being a pardoned, but that there should be an official Apology because their right of desertion success. The choice is plain—the EU or was not recognised. the Euro! But that is the last thing that any Sinn Fein supported the Stormont motion, which was proposed by the DUP. But, of EUophile will say. He/she will try to have course, Sinn Fein in the 1940s did not recognised the 26 County regime as a legitimately- it every which way. The Commission's constituted State. Nor did it do so for half a century after the end of the World War. And top civil servant, Catherine Day, was at it it is still, on occasion, accused of not recognising it in earnest by the governing party in Dublin last month. which is seriously considering honouring the deserters from the Irish Army to join the "Ms Day, the Irish woman who has British Army—at a moment when the British Prime Minister was reasserting a right of been secretary general of the commission military intervention in the Irish state. since 2005, told the Institute of Inter- If the Dail complies with the DUP/Sinn Fein motion, it will substantiate Sinn Fein national European Affairs in Dublin yesterday the future shape of the EU was scepticism about its legitimacy. States assert a monopoly right on the use of force. The currently being determined. The trad- converse of this is that, in democratic states, the apparatus of force of the State must be itional “community method” of doing unconditionally obedient to the elected Government of the state. A State which accords business was being challenged by an a right to its soldiers in time of war, not only to desert but to join the Army of a hostile inter-governmental approach dominated State is, to put it at its mildest, an inadequate state, doubtful of its right to independent by the larger states" (The Irish Times, existence. January 6, 2012). The Irish Army was not a conscript army: soldiers were all volunteers—and it had It is not "being challenged"—the Com- been open to the men in question to go and volunteer in the UK. Many did so and did munity method was challenged, lost and continued on page 2 continued on page 6 We also were to be given the worst Deserters: Ireland A Fascist State? treatment possible, because as you know The Irish Times published the following letter from a lady who had clearly been Ireland did not like the British. The Irish traumatised in its issue of 27th January government gave the British government "Pardon on way for Irish who fought, was in the British forces, and then have it the bill for the children and the British according to Minister for Defence, Alan put on your records (like it stated on my government paid. Shatter… records that went in with me to the The Irish people who did join the British That is good news. But now let him take industrial school at the age of three years forces must have been the bravest people a good look at what happened to soldiers’ old). Letters that were sent to the industrial going, knowing that they were very likely children, charged and taken to court by the school from the parents were sent on to the to face death; to find that if they made it NSPCC and the ISPCC, to be criminally Department of Education. So the children back home to Ireland, their own govern- charged and sentenced to an industrial never got to see their parents; the Depart- ment and people rejected them: and this is school for up to 16 years or life. Yes, I ment of Education and the nuns made us supposed to be a good Christian country. mean life, because the nuns could have orphans. When we were released from the Ireland did not just incarcerate its own you sent to a Magdalene Laundry or a industrial schools there was no family to children; it also incarcerated a lot of foreign mental institution just because your father turn to. children in the industrial schools as well. continued on page 7 preparation had been made) was in collapse. The issue for the British Government then C O N T E N T S was whether to limit the War in the light of Page the military fiasco in France, and make a The Right To Desert. Editorial 1 settlement as France did, or to use British The Euro: Realities And Abstractions. Jack Lane 1 naval dominance to keep the War going Deserters: Ireland A Fascist State? Report 1 and try to embroil the world in it. Readers' Letters: Views Of Sinn Fein. Stephen Richards 3 There was argument within the British Iran Not Trying To Develop A Nuclear Weapon Cabinet on the issue. Churchill, despite —US Defence Secretary Panetta. David Morrison 8 his notorious reputation as a warmonger, Not Sufficient To Be Sour. Jack Lane responds to Desmond Fennell 9 had his way. He kept the War going with Shorts from the Long Fellow (Pensioners; Failed States; When Was Independence?; very little British fighting, spreading it The Media And Change; Mary Raftery; 'Unexpected' Death) 11 piecemeal for a year, until he gained Stalin Raymond Crotty's Appeal To England: as an ally and the catastrophic phase of the Introduction. Brendan Clifford 12 War began. Eire: A Land Where Emigrants Are Born. Raymond Crotty 12 Some Comments On Raymond Crotty's Article. John Martin 13 That Britain might have adopted a Es Ahora. Julianne Herlihy (Elizabeth Bowen, Lies, Spies & Academics different course of action, either in 1939 —Qui Bono?; CUP & Einbhear Walshe) 15 or in June 1940, is not allowed by the Deserters And Their Champions Equally Unworthy Of Trust. Churchillian mythology of the War And, Donal Kennedy (Unpublished Letter) 16 though Ireland maintained its neutrality in 'The Further One Gets From Belfast'. Niall Meehan replies to Jeff Dudgeon 17 the face of Churchill's threats, it failed to The 1934 Larkin Affidavit: A Comment. Jeff Dudgeon replies to produce a history of the War from its own Manus O'Riordan 21 viewpoint subsequently and therefore fell Crozier Antidotes For Hart Maladies. Manus O'Riordan 23 under the spell of the mesmeric myth cast Items From The Irish Bulletin, 1919. Number 7 27 by Churchill. Does It Stack Up? Michael Stack (Inside Job; Corporation Tax; Fee-Paying The object of almost all British history- And Public Schools; Ultra-Privileged Schools) 28 writing is to make the possibility of a Needs Sectioned? Wilson John Haire (Poem) 29 different course of action from the course chosen by Britain unthinkable. What Labour Comment, edited by Pat Maloney: Britain did was the only thing to do and The Guilds And Capitalism anybody who does not agree is a scoundrel. Mondragon, Part 4 (back page) But the revisionists who dominate Irish academic history in the British interest Due to pressure of space, it has been necessary to hold over a number of items, argue the exact opposite case with regard including Naval Warfare, Part 18 by Pat Walsh to Irish history. They charge nationalists with the fallacy of holding that there was not suffer adverse consequences. the War declared on it by Britain. Britain an inevitable, predestined course of events The Irish Times—the newspaper that held a quarter of the island and was exerting leading to the formation of an independent Britain left behind it in Ireland when it had pressure on the other three-quarters to Irish state. They assert that history happens to leave—did some stirring on this issue facilitate its war effort. through a serious of complicated conjunct- over a year ago. It complained that: ures, and that in each conjuncture something "Soldiers who deserted but did not join The possibility of Irish neutrality had different might have been done. But, the British army were treated differently: come about only a year before Britain when it comes to consideration of British Some were not even arrested, and their launched the War on Germany.
Recommended publications
  • The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001
    The Historical Development of Irish Euroscepticism to 2001 Troy James Piechnick Thesis submitted as part of the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program at Flinders University on the 1st of September 2016 Social and Behavioural Sciences School of History and International Relations Flinders University 2016 Supervisors Professor Peter Monteath (PhD) Dr Evan Smith (PhD) Associate Professor Matt Fitzpatrick (PhD) Contents GLOSSARY III ABSTRACT IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 DEFINITIONS 2 PARAMETERS 13 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 MORE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 20 THESIS AND METHODOLOGY 24 STRUCTURE 28 CHAPTER 2 EARLY ANTECEDENTS OF IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM: 1886–1949 30 IRISH REPUBLICANISM, 1780–1886 34 FIRST HOME RULE BILL (1886) AND SECOND HOME RULE BILL (1893) 36 THE BOER WAR, 1899–1902 39 SINN FÉIN 40 WORLD WAR I AND EASTER RISING 42 IRISH DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 46 IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 1919 AND CIVIL WAR 1921 47 BALFOUR DECLARATION OF 1926 AND THE STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER IN 1931 52 EAMON DE VALERA AND WORLD WAR II 54 REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ACT 1948 AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS 61 CONCLUSION 62 CHAPTER 3 THE TREATY OF ROME AND FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 64 THE TREATY OF ROME 67 IRELAND IN THE 1950S 67 DEVELOPING IRISH EUROSCEPTICISM IN THE 1950S 68 FAILED APPLICATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN 1961 AND 1967 71 IDEOLOGICAL MAKINGS: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF A EUROSCEPTIC NATURE (1960S) 75 Communist forms of Irish euroscepticism 75 Irish eurosceptics and republicanism 78 Irish euroscepticism accommodating democratic socialism 85
    [Show full text]
  • Sins of the Father by Conor Mc Cabe
    Sins of the Father 8693 Sins.indd 1 21/04/2011 12:27 8693 Sins.indd 2 21/04/2011 12:27 Sins of the Father TRACING THE DECISIONS THAT SHAPED THE IRISH ECONOMY Conor MCCabe 8693 Sins.indd 3 21/04/2011 12:27 First published 2011 The History Press Ireland 119 Lower Baggot Street Dublin 2 Ireland www.thehistorypress.ie © Conor McCabe, 2011 The right of Conor McCabe to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the Publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. isbn 978 1 84588 693 6 Typesetting and origination by The History Press Printed in Great Britain 8693 Sins.indd 4 21/04/2011 12:27 Contents Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 9 1 Housing 13 2 Agriculture 57 3 Industry 87 4 Finance 125 5 From Bank Guarantee to Bailout 153 Conclusion 191 Notes 197 Bibliography 211 Index 217 8693 Sins.indd 5 21/04/2011 12:27 8693 Sins.indd 6 21/04/2011 12:27 Acknowledgements Special thanks to: Donagh Brennan; my nephews Kevin and Jack Cleary; John Cleary; Ronan Colgan and the staff at History Press Ireland; Rudi Deda; Ciarán Finnegan; Daithí Flynn; Colm Hall; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enduring Nature of National Identity
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Political Science Department -- Theses, Dissertations, and Student Scholarship Political Science, Department of 4-2010 EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, IDENTITY, AND NATIONAL SELF INTEREST: THE ENDURING NATURE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY Tyler R. White University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscitheses Part of the Political Science Commons White, Tyler R., "EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, IDENTITY, AND NATIONAL SELF INTEREST: THE ENDURING NATURE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY" (2010). Political Science Department -- Theses, Dissertations, and Student Scholarship. 6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscitheses/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Department -- Theses, Dissertations, and Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, IDENTITY, AND NATIONAL SELF INTEREST: THE ENDURING NATURE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY By Tyler R. White A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Political Science Under the Supervision of Professor Patrice McMahon April, 2010 EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, IDENTITY, AND NATIONAL SELF INTEREST: THE ENDURING NATURE OF NATIONAL IDENTITY Tyler R.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment of the Supreme Court of Ireland, 'Crotty V. an Taoiseach' (9 April 1987)
    Judgment of the Supreme Court of Ireland, 'Crotty v. An Taoiseach' (9 April 1987) Caption: In April 1987, the Irish Supreme Court upholds Raymond Crotty’s claim and challenges the ratification of the Single European Act. It appears that the ratification of any Community treaty containing at least one provision that fundamentally affects the legal nature, field of application or objectives of the Communities must give rise to a revision of the Irish Constitution, which requires a referendum. Source: Judgment of the Court delivered pursuant to the provisions of Article 34.4.5° by Finlay CJ, No. 12036P, Dublin, 9 April 1987. Copyright: Supreme Court of Ireland URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/judgment_of_the_supreme_court_of_ireland_crotty_v_an_taoiseach_9_april_1987-en- 187e7d4f-aa3e-43da-a1e2-bb3fc41d2fbd.html Publication date: 19/12/2013 1 / 26 19/12/2013 The Supreme Court 1986 No. 12036P Between Raymond Crotty Plaintiff And An Taoiseach and Others Defendants [9th April, 1987] [Judgment of the Court delivered pursuant to the provisions of Article 34.4.5° by Finlay CJ] Finlay C.J.: Part of the plaintiff’s appeal in this case is against the dismiss by the High Court of his claim for a declaration that the European Communities (Amendment) Act, 1986, is invalid having regard to the provisions of the Constitution. The Court in this decision deals with that issue only. The European Communities (Amendment) Act, 1986, ("the Act of 1986") purports to amend the European Communities Act, 1972, and to bring into the domestic law of the State Article 3, s. 1; Title II; Article 31; Article 32; and in part Articles 33 and 34 of the Single European Act ("the SEA ").
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Gael Constituency Archives P39/C
    FINE GAEL CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVES P39/C UCD Archives School of History and Archives archives @ucd.ie www.ucd.ie/archives T + 353 1 716 7555 F + 353 1 716 1146 © 2005 University College Dublin. All rights reserved ii INTRODUCTORY NOTE v FINE GAEL CONSTITUENCY ARCHIVES: CARLOW-KILKENNY, 1954-75 1 CLARE, 1954-75 15 CLARE-SOUTH GALWAY, 1969-74 23 CORK, 1954-75 27 DONEGAL, 1954-74 47 DONEGAL-LEITRIM, 1970-75 57 DUBLIN, 1952-70 61 DUBLIN, 1971-75 103 GALWAY, 1954-75 139 KERRY, 1954-75 157 KILDARE, 1954-75 167 LAOIS-OFFALY, 1954-75 173 LIMERICK, 1954-75 187 LONGFORD-WESTMEATH, 1954-74 199 iii LOUTH, 1954-75 211 MAYO, 1954-75 217 MEATH, 1954-75 231 MONAGHAN, 1954-75 237 ROSCOMMON, 1954-60 243 ROSCOMMON-LEITRIM, 1961-75 249 SLIGO-LEITRIM, 1954-75 259 TIPPERARY NORTH, 1954-75 273 TIPPERARY SOUTH, 1954-75 283 WATERFORD, 1954-75 293 WEXFORD, 1954-75 301 WICKLOW, 1954-75 309 iv INTRODUCTORY NOTE The Fine Gael constituency files which are the subject of this list, were transferred to UCD Archives in April 1978 as part of a larger accession of Party archives. Other series within the collection previously listed and made available include minutes of the parliamentary party, 1929-49, and other bodies such as the Stranding Committee/Coiste Gnotha, 1922-25 and 1933-45 [P39/MIN]; general election records, 1932- 73 [P39/GE]; and records of presidential elections and constitutional referenda, 1945-73 [P39/PR]. The constituency files are headquarters records which document the relationship between headquarters and individual constituencies over a period of twenty years from 1954; and reflect the state of party organisation at both local and national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland™S Economic Transformation
    Working Paper No.2, December 1998 IRELAND”S ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION Industrial Policy, European Integration and Social Partnership Rory O’Donnell Jean Monnet Associate Professor of European Business Studies at University College Dublin © Rory O’Donnell EU Center website: www.pitt.edu/~wesnews/EUCenter CWES website: www.pitt.edu/~wesnews CERN Virtual Library West European Research Resources website: www.pitt.edu/~wwwes Rory O’Donnell is a Jean Monnet Associate Professor of European Business Studies at the Michael Smurfit Graduate School of Business, University College Dublin. He received graduate degrees in Economics from University College Dublin and University of London, before doing his Ph.D. at the University of Cambridge. In addition to academic posts, he has worked as an economist and later as Director at Ireland’s National Economic and Social Council. He has prepared policy research on European integration, regional and local development, competitive advantage and the analytical foundations of Irish social partnership. He was a founding member of the Institute of European Affairs, and edited its volume Economic and Monetary Union (1991). All views expressed are personal and should not be regarded as the Center for West European Studies’ or European Union Center’s position on the issues covered in the paper. The Center for West European Studies (CWES) and the European Union Center, at the University of Pittsburgh publish this Policy Paper Series on political economy issues that face policy makers and business leaders located on both sides of the Atlantic. At least two of the four papers published annually will deal specifically with the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Quo Vadis? on 12 June 2008 Has Presented the Irish Government with the Most Serious Crisis in External Relations John O’Brennan Since the Second World War
    No. 176 y October 2008 Introduction Ireland & the Lisbon Treaty: The rejection of the Lisbon Treaty by the electorate Quo Vadis? on 12 June 2008 has presented the Irish government with the most serious crisis in external relations John O’Brennan since the Second World War. This was the third such referendum on Europe held in Ireland since the and the government-commissioned Millward Brown millennium and the second plebiscite in three to IMS research findings.2 result in a rejection of an EU Treaty following the failed Nice poll in 2001. There is no obvious Any course of action that involves another solution to the dilemma the government faces and referendum campaign implies significant risks for no obvious pathway to achieve ratification. There is the Irish government and for Ireland’s position however a clear consensus amongst the political within the European Union. The principal danger parties that ratification constitutes both a clear here lies in the continuing knowledge deficit political priority and a fundamental national interest. regarding EU affairs: fully 42% of respondents At the October European Council summit in polled by Millward Brown cited a “lack of Brussels, Taoiseach Brian Cowen promised to come knowledge/information/understanding” as their back to the December meeting “with a view to our reason for voting No to Lisbon.3 But the threat to defining together the elements of a solution and a Ireland’s national interests, to the country’s long- common path to follow”.1 But the external context is term economic prosperity and international relations now clear – EU leaders indicated an unwillingness are very grave and now necessitate the most to re-negotiate any part of the Treaty: it will be up to substantive engagement by political actors.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ireland's Foreign Policy Adaptation to Europe
    Ireland’s Foreign Policy Adaptation to Europe: Principled and Pragmatic? Nicholas Rees, Liverpool Hope University Abstract This article examines Ireland’s foreign policy adaptation to Europe over the last forty years of EU membership. It looks at the types of policy and institutional changes that have occurred in Ireland’s foreign relations over four time periods: the historical-institutional context of Irish foreign policy (1921-73), Ireland’s accession and adaptation to Europe (1973-1986), The Single European Act to the Maastricht Treaty and beyond (1986-2008), and the impact of the economic crisis of 2008 on Irish foreign policy, Europe and the international economic system (2008-). In each phase of these developments, the article considers the pressures for adaptation (i.e. Europeanisation), the response of the Irish foreign policy ‘establishment’ and the impact on foreign policy, including Ireland’s outlook on international affairs. 1. Introduction Ireland’s place in the world today is very different to the one that it occupied prior to membership, reflecting its integration as an open economy into the European Union and the global economy (Hederman-O’Brien 1983, Keatinge 1978, Murphy 2003). The article examines Ireland’s adaptation to Europe, drawing on the literature on Europeanisation (Featherstone and Radaelli 2003, Graziano and Vink 2007, Rees 2007), to consider how EEC/EU membership impacted on Irish foreign policy, including its principles and stance in international affairs, as well as the organisational arrangements. It considers the adaptational pressures arising out of the obligations of EU membership and the impact these had on the evolution of Irish foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • World-Ecology and Ireland: the Neoliberal Ecological Regime
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH ISSN: 1076-156X | Vol. 22 Issue 1 Page 145-176 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2016.641 | jwsr.org World-Ecology and Ireland: The Neoliberal Ecological Regime Sharae Deckard University College Dublin [email protected] Abstract Since the collapse of the Celtic Tiger, the socio-economic particularity of neoliberal capitalism in its Irish manifestation has increasingly been critiqued, but little attention has been paid to neoliberalism as ecology within Ireland. This article conducts an exploratory survey of the characteristics of the Irish neoliberal ecological regime during and after the Celtic Tiger, identifying the opening of new commodity frontiers (such as fracking, water, agro-biotechnology, and biopharma) constituted in the neoliberal drive to appropriate and financialize nature. I argue for the usefulness of applying not only the tools of world-systems analysis, but also Jason W. Moore’s world-ecological paradigm, to analysis of Ireland as a semi-periphery. What is crucial to a macro- ecological understanding of Ireland’s experience of the neoliberal regime of the world-ecology is the inextricability of its financial role as a tax haven and secrecy jurisdiction zone from its environmental function as a semi-peripheral pollution and water haven. More expansive, dialectical understandings of “ecology” as comprising the whole of socio-ecological relations within the capitalist world-ecology—from farming to pharma to financialization—are vital to forming configurations of knowledge able not only to take account of Ireland’s role in the environmental history of capitalism, but also to respond to the urgent ecological crises of the neoliberal present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Economic Realignment, Ireland 1948-1964
    THE POLITICS OF ECONOMIC REALIGNMENT, IRELAND 1948-1964 GARY MURPHY MA Dissertation submitted for the degree of Ph.D. under the supervision of Professor Eunan O’Halpin, Dublin City University Business School Dublin City University September 1996 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ID No.: 92701558 Date: < ? /< //9 £ Contents Page Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Abbreviations iv Introduction v Chapter One: Financial Ideology and The Political Economy of Ireland 1948-1953 1 Chapter Two: Changes in the Political Economy 1954-1963 55 Chapter Three: The Evolution of Trade Union Influence in the Economic Policy Process 1948-1964 120 Chapter Four: State-Farmer Relations 1948-1964 156 Chapter Five: Ireland and a Wider Europe: The EFTA Negotiations 1957-1961 199 Chapter Six: The Final Move Towards Economic Interdependence: The EEC negotiations 1961-1964 247 Conclusion 285 Note on primary sources 293 Notes 299 Bibliography 349 ABSTRACT The politics of economic realignment, Ireland 1948-1964 This dissertation analyses the transformation of Irish economic policy formulation from the formation of the first inter-party government in 1948 to the breakdown of Ireland’s application to join the EEC in 1963 and its immediate consequences. Based on extensive research in departmental files, and the personal papers of politicians and other policy players, and interviews with officials, businessmen and others who were active during the period, the study has a dual approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinn Féin, Democracy Or Dependency (1992)
    Sinn Féin, Democracy or Dependency (1992) Caption: In 1992, Sinn Féin, Irish nationalist republican party, warns the Irish people against the disastrous effects of the Treaty on European Union and calls for them to vote against the treaty in the referendum to be held on 18 June 1992. Source: Sinn Féin. Democracy or Dependency. Dublin: Sinn Féin Trade Union Department, 1992. 16 p. Copyright: (c) Sinn Féin URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/sinn_fein_democracy_or_dependency_1992-en-1845913e-3775-4493-b76e- fc46c9e6a561.html Publication date: 04/09/2012 1 / 11 04/09/2012 Sinn Féin: Democracy or Dependency Section 1 The aims and objectives of the Maastricht Treaty. The EC was established on the basis that the common interests of the member states would be best served by closer economic ties. The Maastricht Treaty is the third EC treaty aimed at forwarding that economic process. It was preceded by the 1957 Treaty of Rome and the 1987 Single European Act. The Maastricht Treaty is essentially a series of amendments to the two existing treaties mentioned above. It is designed to initiate the final stages of the EC's move towards European Union. The process has been broken into three stages, developing European Commission president Jacques Delors' original plan. While involving political and economic processes, European Union is also the product of a political ideology, the essence of which is that the European Community is a vehicle for the creation of an economic and political superpower. Sinn Féin believes the real question is whose interests are served by the closer economic ties that have developed over the last twenty years? Is it the interests of workers or the corporations that have developed and streamlined their operations to the EC open market economy? Since the entry of the 26 Counties into the EC we have in our economy created substantial economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland, Scotland, and the Celtic Response to European Integration, 1961–1975
    Joining Europe: Ireland, Scotland, and the Celtic Response to European Integration, 1961–1975 Andrew D. Devenney uropean integration has bedeviled political elites in the British Isles since E1945.1 Whether it was the lingering pretensions of imperial grandeur or stubbornly held neutrality, national leaders in both Britain and Ireland Andrew D. Devenney is a visiting assistant professor of world history at Grand Valley State University. An earlier version of this article was presented at the Midwest Conference of British Studies in October 2006. He is currently working on a book manuscript entitled “European Integration and the British Isles: Becoming European in England, Scotland, and Ireland, 1961–1975.” He would like to thank Anna Clark, Eric Johnson, Matthew McCabe, Gary Murphy, Tim O’Neil, Jim Schmiechen, and the two anonymous reviewers of the Journal of British Studies for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. He would also like to thank Central Michigan University, Dublin City University, and the Fulbright Scholarship Board of the U.S. Department of State in supporting the research for this article. 1 The best recent works on Britain include Brian Brivati and Harriet Jones, eds., From Reconstruction to Integration: Britain and Europe since 1945 (Leicester, 1993); Edmund Dell, The Schuman Plan and the British Abdication of Leadership in Europe (Oxford, 1995); Wolfram Kaiser, Using Europe, Abusing the Europeans: Britain and European Integration, 1945–63 (New York, 1996); Piers Ludlow, Dealing withBritain: The Six and the First UK Membership Application (Cambridge, 1997); James Ellison, Threatening Europe: Britain and the Creation of the European Community, 1955–1958 (Basingstoke, 2000); John W.
    [Show full text]