STORRINGTON SULLINGTON HERITAGE R5.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 29
ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 29 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2003: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2003 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361-4231 Typeset by Creative Associates 115 Magdalen Road Oxford OX4 1RS Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 CONTENTS BATTLE OF BRITAIN DAY. Address by Dr Alfred Price at the 5 AGM held on 12th June 2002 WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LUFTWAFFE’S ‘TIP 24 AND RUN’ BOMBING ATTACKS, MARCH 1942-JUNE 1943? A winning British Two Air Forces Award paper by Sqn Ldr Chris Goss SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH 52 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD IN THE ROYAL AIR FORCE CLUB ON 12th JUNE 2002 ON THE GROUND BUT ON THE AIR by Charles Mitchell 55 ST-OMER APPEAL UPDATE by Air Cdre Peter Dye 59 LIFE IN THE SHADOWS by Sqn Ldr Stanley Booker 62 THE MUNICIPAL LIAISON SCHEME by Wg Cdr C G Jefford 76 BOOK REVIEWS. 80 4 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal -
How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key
How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British courage and capability might not have been enough to win; German mistakes were also key. By John T. Correll n July 1940, the situation looked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall can do more than delay the result.” Gen. dire for Great Britain. It had taken fight on the landing grounds, we shall Maxime Weygand, commander in chief Germany less than two months to fight in the fields and in the streets, we of French military forces until France’s invade and conquer most of Western shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, predicted, “In three weeks, IEurope. The fast-moving German Army, surrender.” England will have her neck wrung like supported by panzers and Stuka dive Not everyone agreed with Churchill. a chicken.” bombers, overwhelmed the Netherlands Appeasement and defeatism were rife in Thus it was that the events of July 10 and Belgium in a matter of days. France, the British Foreign Office. The Foreign through Oct. 31—known to history as the which had 114 divisions and outnumbered Secretary, Lord Halifax, believed that Battle of Britain—came as a surprise to the Germany in tanks and artillery, held out a Britain had lost already. To Churchill’s prophets of doom. Britain won. The RAF little longer but surrendered on June 22. fury, the undersecretary of state for for- proved to be a better combat force than Britain was fortunate to have extracted its eign affairs, Richard A. “Rab” Butler, told the Luftwaffe in almost every respect. -
Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain
Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain By Skyla Gabriel and Hannah Seidl Background on Axis Blitzkrieg ● A military strategy specifically designed to create disorganization in enemy forces by logical firepower and mobility of forces ● Limits civilian casualty and waste of fire power ● Developed in Germany 1918-1939 as a result of WW1 ● Used in Warsaw, Poland in 1939, then with eventually used in Belgium, the Netherlands, North Africa, and even against the Soviet Union Hitler’s Plan and “The Night Before” ● Due to the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union, once the Polish state was divided up, Hitler would colonize the territory and only allow the “superior race” to live there and would enslave the natives. ● On August 31, 1939 Hitler ordered Nazi S.S. troops,wearing Polish officer uniforms, to sneak into Poland. ● The troops did minor damage to buildings and equipment. ● Left dead concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms ● This was meant to mar the start of the Polish Invasion when the bodies were found in the morning by Polish officers Initial stages ● Initially, one of Hitler’s first acts after coming to power was to sign a nonaggression pact (January 1934) with Poland in order to avoid a French- Polish alliance before Germany could rearm. ● Through 1935- March 1939 Germany slowly gained more power through rearmament (agreed to by both France and Britain), Germany then gained back the Rhineland through militarization, annexation of Austria, and finally at the Munich Conference they were given the Sudetenland. ● Once Czechoslovakia was dismembered Britain and France responded by essentially backing Poland and Hitler responded by signing a non-aggression with the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939 ● The German-Soviet pact agreed Poland be split between the two powers, the new pact allowed Germany to attack Poland without fear of Soviet intervention The Attack ● On September 1st, 1939 Germany invaded Warsaw, Poland ● Schleswig-Holstein, a German Battleship at 4:45am began to fire on the Polish garrison in Westerplatte Fort, Danzig. -
HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST of NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data Produced 14/11/16
HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST OF NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data produced 14/11/16 Parish: Ashurst PC Ward: Steyning Case No: DC/16/2470 Case Officer: James Overall Date Valid: 8 November 2016 Comments by: To Be Consulted Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Householder Agent: Philip Clay Applicant: Mr & Mrs Wightwick Proposal: Demolition of existing conservatory and erection of single storey side extension Site Address: Sussex Place Horsebridge Common Ashurst Steyning West Sussex BN44 3AL Grid Ref: 518078 114671 Parish: Ashington PC Ward: Chanctonbury Case No: DC/16/2513 Case Officer: Oguzhan Denizer Date Valid: 4 November 2016 Comments by: To Be Consulted Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Tel Notification (28 days) Agent: Applicant: Gillian Marshall Proposal: Prior Notification to install an additional 300 mm dish for airwave on new pole fixed to existing tower at 19.77m Site Address: Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd Telecommunications Mast Spring Gardens Nursery Spring Gardens Washington West Sussex Grid Ref: 512059 114805 Parish: Billingshurst PC Ward: Billingshurst and Shipley Case No: DC/16/2459 Case Officer: Nicola Pettifer Date Valid: 4 November 2016 Comments by: 29 November 2016 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Minor Other Agent: Mr Matt Bridle Applicant: Mr David Gillingham Proposal: Erection of an additional storage unit Site Address: Rosier Commercial Centre Coneyhurst Road Billingshurst West Sussex Grid Ref: 509555 125207 Parish: Billingshurst PC Ward: Billingshurst and Shipley Case No: DC/16/2502 -
Development Management (South) Committee
Public Document Pack Email: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 Development Management (South) Committee Tuesday, 15th November, 2016 at 2.30 pm Main Conference Room, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham Councillors: Brian O'Connell (Chairman) Paul Clarke (Vice-Chairman) John Blackall Gordon Lindsay Jonathan Chowen Tim Lloyd Philip Circus Paul Marshall Roger Clarke Mike Morgan David Coldwell Kate Rowbottom Ray Dawe Jim Sanson Brian Donnelly Ben Staines David Jenkins Claire Vickers Nigel Jupp Michael Willett Liz Kitchen You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Agenda Page No. 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes 3 - 12 To approve as correct the minutes of the meeting held on 18th October 2016 3. Declarations of Members' Interests To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee 4. Announcements To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive To consider the following reports of the Development Manager and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: 5. Appeals 13 - 14 Horsham District Council, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Telephone: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) Horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive – Tom Crowley Corporate & Democratic Services www.hastings.gov.uk/meetings 2 1 Applications for determination by Committee: 6. DC/16/2064 - Land North of The Rosary, Partridge Green (Ward: Cowfold, 15 - 34 Shermanbury & West Grinstead) Applicant: Mrs Elizabeth Tompkins 7. DC/16/1974 - Vine Cottage, Coolham Road, Coolham (Ward: Billingshurst 35 - 54 & Shipley) Applicant: Mr Jamie Coad 8. DC/16/1963 - High Chaparral, London Road, Washington (Ward: Chantry) 55 - 64 Applicant: Mr S Page 9. -
Storrington, Sullington and Washington Neighbourhood Plan
Storrington, Sullington and Washington WASHINGTON PARISH COUNCIL Neighbourhood Plan Dear Sirs Storrington, Sullington & Washington Neighbourhood Plan: Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Letter I set out below for your attention the proposed scope of the Sustainability Appraisal/Strategic Environmental Assessment (SA/SEA) to accompany the forthcoming Storrington, Sullington & Washington Neighbourhood Plan (SSWNP). This letter and its appendices should be regarded as the Scoping Report of the SSWNP in accordance with Stage A of the provisions of the Environmental Assessment of Plans & Programmes Regulations 2004 (which implement EU Directive 2001/42). As a statutory consultee in the Regulations you are invited to comment on this report and I would be grateful for your comment by 26th September 2014. Background The SSWNP is being prepared by the Storrington & Sullington Parish Council and Washington Parish Council as qualifying bodies under the 2012 Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations. In accordance with the 2004 Regulations 2004, the local planning authority, Horsham District Council, issued its formal screening opinion on 20 May 2014, concluding that an SEA is required and that it would prefer this is undertaken as part of a wider Sustainability Appraisal (SA/SEA). In its decision, the District Council has not made its reasons explicit for reaching this conclusion, but it is understood that the likely intention of the SSWNP to contain policies allocating land for development is the primary reason. A third of the designated area lies within the South Downs National Park and there are no European sites within the area, although the area does lie within the 15km buffer zone of the Arundel Valley SAC/SPA/Ramsar site. -
Storrington & Sullington Parish Design Statement
STORRINGTON & SULLINGTON PARISH DESIGN STATEMENT 1 Storrington & Sullington Parish Boundary 2 Storrington & Sullington Parish Design Statement Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Page 4 1.1 What is a Design Statement 1.2 What is its Relationship to HDC’s Local Development Framework 2. THE VILLAGE CONTEXT/CHARACTER OF THE VILLAGE Pages 4 - 17 2.1 Geographic and Historic Background 2.2 The Parish Today 2.3 Council Offices 2.4 Surrounding Countryside and Landscape 2.5 Historic Character 2.6 Buildings/Materials – e.g. designs, walls, roofs, chimneys, doors and windows 3. SPECIFIC AREAS OF PROTECTION Pages 18 - 23 3.1 Conservation Area/Site of Special Scientific Interest 3.2 A.O.N.B./South Downs National Park 3.3 Listed Buildings 4. TREES, HEDGEROWS AND PONDS Page 24 - 25 5. STREET FURNITURE Page 26 5.1 Paving, Flower Planters, Streetlights, Bus Shelters 6. FOOTPATHS AND BRIDLEWAYS Page 27 7. PLANNING Pages 28 - 30 7.1 Lessons to be learned 7.2 Principles and Guidelines for the Future 8. APPENDICES Page 30 8.1 Acknowledgements 3 1. INTRODUCTION we value about our buildings, street scenes and open spaces. 1.1 What is a Design Statement? Since the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the advent of Local A Design Statement is information Development Frameworks, Design based on local knowledge, which describes Statements are now fully recognised as the qualities that residents value in their important tools for providing the detail to village and its surroundings. the Council’s overarching design policies. They can now be adopted as A Village Design Statement sets out Supplementary Planning Documents clear and simple guidance for the design of (SPD) and have more statutory weight in all development within the village, based the planning system. -
Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Committee (South
Public Document Pack Email: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 Planning Committee (South) Tuesday, 27th April, 2021 at 2.30 pm via Remote Video Link Councillors: Brian Donnelly (Chairman) Tim Lloyd (Vice-Chairman) John Blackall Mike Morgan Chris Brown Roger Noel Jonathan Chowen Bob Platt Philip Circus Josh Potts Paul Clarke Kate Rowbottom Michael Croker Jack Saheid Ray Dawe Jim Sanson Nigel Jupp Diana van der Klugt Liz Kitchen Claire Vickers Lynn Lambert James Wright You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Glen Chipp Chief Executive Agenda Page No. GUIDANCE ON PLANNING COMMITTEE PROCEDURE 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes 7 - 14 To approve as correct the minutes of the meetings held on 9 March and 16 March 2021 (Note: If any Member wishes to propose an amendment to the minutes they should submit this in writing to [email protected] at least 24 hours before the meeting. Where applicable, the audio recording of the meeting will be checked to ensure the accuracy of the proposed amendment.) 3. Declarations of Members' Interests To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee 4. Announcements To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive Horsham District Council, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Telephone: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) Horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive – Glen Chipp Corporate & Democratic Services www.hastings.gov.uk /meetings To consider the following reports of the Head of Development and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: 5. -
Tuskegee Airmen Chronology Daniel L. Haulman Organizational
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN CHRONOLOGY DANIEL L. HAULMAN ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY BRANCH AIR FORCE HISTORICAL RESEARCH AGENCY MAXWELL AFB, AL 36112-6424 14 November 2011 1 TUSKEGEE AIRMEN CHRONOLOGY Dr. Daniel L. Haulman Chief, Organization History Division Air Force Historical Research Agency Expanded Edition: 30 September 2011 27 June 1939: Congress passed the Civilian Pilot Training Act. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies.) September-October 1939: The Civil Aeronautics Administration received Tuskegee Institute’s application to be a civilian pilot training institution, and after Tuskegee obtained permission to use the Montgomery Airport as a facility, the application was approved. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies) Late February 1940: The Civil Aeronautics Authority approved Tuskegee’s Kennedy Field for Civilian Pilot Training, after improvements to the field, eliminating Tuskegee Institute’s need to use the Montgomery Airport. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies) 25 March 1940: George A. Wiggs arrived in Tuskegee to administer the standard written examination required of all Civilian Pilot Training students. Every student who took the examination passed, surpassing the passing rate of other schools in the South. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies.) 16 September 1940: Congress passed a Selective Service Act which required all the armed services to enlist “Negroes”. On the same day, the War Department announced that the Civil Aeronautics Authority, in cooperation with the U.S. Army, would start the development of “colored personnel” for the aviation service. (Public Law 783, 16 September 1940; War Department Press Release, 16 September 1940; 99th Fighter Squadron summary history in the lineage and honors folder of the 99th Flying Training Squadron at the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA), Maxwell AFB, AL) Late October 1940: In a press release, President Franklin D. -
View of the British Way in Warfare, by Captain B
“The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Katie Lynn Brown August 2011 © 2011 Katie Lynn Brown. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled “The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 by KATIE LYNN BROWN has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT BROWN, KATIE LYNN, M.A., August 2011, History “The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 Director of Thesis: Peter John Brobst The historiography of British grand strategy in the interwar years overlooks the importance air power had in determining Britain’s interwar strategy. Rather than acknowledging the newly developed third dimension of warfare, most historians attempt to place air power in the traditional debate between a Continental commitment and a strong navy. By examining the development of the Royal Air Force in the interwar years, this thesis will show that air power was extremely influential in developing Britain’s grand strategy. Moreover, this thesis will study the Royal Air Force’s reliance on strategic bombing to consider any legal or moral issues. Finally, this thesis will explore British air defenses in the 1930s as well as the first major air battle in World War II, the Battle of Britain, to see if the Royal Air Force’s almost uncompromising faith in strategic bombing was warranted. -
Sullington, Chantry & the South Downs
point your feet on a new path Sullington, Chantry and the South Downs Distance: 9½ km=5¾ miles easy-to-moderate walking Region: West Sussex Date written: 5-aug-2010 Author: Hautboy Last update: 23-aug-2021 Refreshments: Washington, Sullington Manor Farm Maps: Explorer 121 (Arundel) Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. High hills, views, village In Brief This walk takes you along a beautiful stretch of the South Downs with extensive views all round. It begins with a lowland route, full of interesting features, including a Saxon church, through the valley. This walk was previously the western part of a longer 20 km=12½ mile walk taking in Chanctonbury and Steyning. That longer walk is now available as a big zipper by combining it with the walk Chanctonbury, Steyning & the South Downs with which the longer walk begins. Zip points are indicated in the guides. The going is easy over the chalk downs and fairly level but with a steep climb in the middle. You may encounter some mud on the lower paths in the wetter seasons, where ankle boots will be an advantage. There are no nettles or brambles on this walk, so any reasonable attire will be fine. Your dog will also enjoy this walk if he is good with cattle and not too large (because of a stile or very stiff gate at the start of the walk). -
The Battle of Britain, 1945–1965 : the Air Ministry and the Few / Garry Campion
Copyrighted material – 978–0–230–28454–8 © Garry Campion 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–0–230–28454–8 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.