DOCSLIB.ORG

RBF 99 Annual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RBF 99 Annual ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND Annual Report 1999 ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND Annual Report 1999 ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND, INC. Madison Avenue New York, New York - Telephone: .. Facsimile: .. E-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: www.rbf.org POCANTICO CONFERENCE CENTER OF THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND Lake Road Pocantico Hills, New York - Telephone: .. Facsimile: .. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © , Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. Design: H Plus Incorporated Printing: Finlay Printing Printed on Recycled Paper Contents 5 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR 9 PRESIDENT’S REPORT ABOUT THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND 13 The Rockefeller Brothers Fund 14 Grantmaking Programs 16 Other Programs 17 How to Apply for a Grant 19 Asian Cultural Council ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND PROGRAMS 23 Sustainable Resource Use 37 Global Security 47 Nonprofit Sector 57 Education 63 New York City 71 South Africa 77 Arts and Culture 83 Health 89 Pocantico Programs 101 Ramon Magsaysay Award Foundation 105 Grants Paid in 1999 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS 129 Executive Vice President’s Report 131 Financial Report 148 Trustees, Officers, and Staff 151 INDEX A Message from the Chair At the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, will be remembered first and foremost as the year of the merger with the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation (CECF). In the reflections on the year that follow, attention focuses on this development and on the process of program review at the RBF, which has intensified with the merger. In addition, this space includes a brief account of Colin Campbell’s presidency, since was his last full year at the Fund. On August , , he assumed the responsibilities of president of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. After a year of careful planning, the merger of the RBF and the Culpeper Foundation became official on July , . It was agreed that the merged Steven C. Rockefeller foundations would operate under the name of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Four CECF trustees, Hunter Lewis, James Moltz, John Morning, and Dr. Tadataka Yamada, were elected to the RBF board of trustees. In addition, four CECF staff members joined the RBF. Linda Jacobs was appointed vice president of the Fund, and Boris Wessely became the Fund’s new treasurer. At the time of the merger, the RBF endowment was million, and the Culpeper endowment was million. Under the guidance of the RBF Finance Committee, the portfolios of the two foundations have been fully integrated. By year’s end, the RBF endowment had grown to $ million. With substantial new financial resources in hand and the need to integrate the RBF and CECF grant programs, the RBF trustees created a Strategic Review Committee charged with systematically evaluating the RBF and CECF grant programs and making recommendations for the future. The trustees have approached the review process with a concern for continuity with the past as well as with openness to change and innovation. The larger goals and purposes of RBF grantmaking and the geographical focus of the Fund’s international work will be carefully studied. The RBF’s mission statement will be revised to reflect new challenges and developments. It is anticipated that the review process will take roughly two years to complete and should conclude by the end of . The Strategic Review Committee turned its attention first to the education programs of the RBF and former Culpeper Foundation. By December a consensus had been reached that the RBF should resume its very successful program of Fellowships for Minority Undergraduates Entering the Teaching Profession, further develop its programs in early childhood education with a primary emphasis on New York City, and provide support to selected educational institutions with programs that complement these MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR • 5 concerns. A decision was made to phase out the existing programs in undergraduate higher education that have focused primarily on foreign language teaching, environmental studies, and the use of technology in teaching and research. Program review is an ongoing activity at the RBF. During the years and , the Fund undertook a lengthy study of how best to promote global security in a post-Cold War world, leading to the design of a new Global Security program. The trustees formally launched the new program in the spring of . Following a year-long review in , they also adopted early in a revised set of guidelines for the Fund’s South Africa program in early childhood development and basic education. During the Fund commissioned an outside analysis and evaluation of grants totaling $. million made between and in support of the conservation of marine biological resources in the United States. The study found that RBF grantmaking, coupled with RBF staff leadership in the field, had effectively promoted significant reform in fisheries management. In accord with the recommendations of the study report, the trustees voted to continue grantmaking in this critical area for at least another two to three years. After a decade of grantmaking designed to promote a rebirth of civil society and sustainable development in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, the Fund began an assessment of its accomplishments and of future challenges in the region. In this connection, in December the trustees approved a special million grant payable over five years to the German Marshall Fund of the United States as the RBF contribution to the newly established Trust for Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe. William S. Moody, an RBF program officer, played the leading role in conceiving and organizing the new Trust. It is anticipated that the Trust, which has been designed as a $ million, ten- year fund, will consolidate the progress made in developing a strong nonprofit sector in Central and Eastern Europe and help to advance ongoing efforts to promote the growth of civil society. The Ford Foundation, Open Society Institute, C.S. Mott Foundation, and German Marshall Fund are among those collaborating with the RBF on this project. The trustees continue to follow closely the ongoing development of the program at the RBF Pocantico Conference Center that opened in . The Center has proven to be a very valuable resource that has significantly enhanced the Fund’s capacity to promote dialogue, collaboration, and strategic social change. From to , there was approximately a percent increase in the number of conferences hosted by the Center, which for the first time operated at close to its full capacity in . During the year, , men and women from dozens of countries participated in conferences. Roughly a third of these conferences were funded by the RBF, and percent were convened by RBF staff. Colin Campbell’s departure from the RBF after years as president provides an opportunity to reflect on a remarkable chapter in the history of the Fund. At Colin’s last board meeting in June , the trustees formally recognized and expressed their deep appreciation for his exceptional leadership and many outstanding contributions. What follows is largely adapted from a tribute that was read on that occasion. • • • After having served as the president of Wesleyan University for years, Colin G. Campbell was appointed the president and a trustee of the RBF in . The years of Colin’s presidency have been a period of extraordinary growth and development at the Fund. The RBF has been transformed from a relatively small foundation with an endowment of million into a complex organization that by mid- had an $ million endowment and embraced within its framework a historic property, an international conference center, and three other funds (the Asian Cultural Council, Rockefeller Family Fund, and DR Fund). The annual program budget in was . million; by mid- it had risen to over million. 6 • ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND 1999 ANNUAL REPORT RBF Trustees Front row (left to right): Neva Goodwin, Steven Rockefeller, Colin Campbell, Abby O’Neill, David Rockefeller, Jr. Back Row (left to right): James Moltz, Hunter Lewis, Tadataka Yamada, Catherine Broderick, Richard Chasin, William Luers (Advisory Trustee), John Morning, Richard Parsons, Joseph Pierson, Peggy Dulany, David Callard, Jessica Einhorn. Not present: Robert Oxnam, Edmond Villani, Frank Wisner. Recognizing that we live in an increasingly interdependent world, Colin has been an articulate proponent of collaboration and the building of partnerships among organizations and across all boundaries of discipline, culture, nationality, and region. At the RBF he has implemented this philosophy with foresight and creative imagination. Not only has he actively pursued partnerships with other foundations in order to leverage the Fund’s grantmaking, he has also linked the RBF with other Rockefeller family-related institutions. During his first year, Colin worked out an arrangement whereby the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) became affiliated with the RBF. This provided ACC with a much-needed secure base of support that enabled it to continue its programs, increase its fundraising, and build its capacity as an institution. The new link between the RBF and ACC marked a return of the Fund to the field of the arts after almost twenty years. The most dramatic achievement of Colin’s early years at the RBF was the negotiation of an agreement involving David Rockefeller, Laurance Rockefeller, the National Trust for Historical Preservation, and the RBF concerning the Rockefeller family Pocantico Estate and Historic Area in Westchester County, outside New York City. This agreement, reached in , brought to a happy conclusion over a decade of efforts to find a way to realize Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller’s wish to preserve Kykuit, the Pocantico home of John D. Rockefeller Senior and Junior as well as the Governor, and make it available to the public. It made possible the creation of the RBF Pocantico Conference Center, which has significantly strengthened the Fund’s convening power. The agreement also established a relationship among the Rockefeller family, the National Trust, and the RBF that has made possible the future preservation of the entire Pocantico Estate in a way that will benefit the public and further enhance the resources available to the Pocantico Conference Center.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rockefellers an Enduring Legacy
    The Rockefellers An Enduring Legacy 90 / OCTOBER 2012 / WWW.WESTCHESTERMAGAZINE.COM alfway through a three-hour tour The views from Kykuit were astound- of the Kykuit mansion, the for- ing—possibly the best in Westchester. The mer home to four generations Hudson sparkled like a thousand stars lit up of Rockefellers, it became appar- in the night sky. Surrounding towns, includ- ent that I was going to need to ing Tarrytown and Sleepy Hollow, looked as Huse the bathroom—a large mug of iced coffee if civilization had yet to move in, the tree- purchased at a Tarrytown café was to blame. tops hiding any sign of human life. I felt like My guide, Corinne, a woman of perhaps 94, a time-traveler whisked back to a bygone era. Look around eagerly led me to a marble bathroom enclosed This must have been the view that had in- by velvet ropes, telling me this may have been spired John D. Rockefeller to purchase land you. How where John D. Rockefeller had spent a great in Westchester in 1893. New York City, where deal of his time. When, after several high- the majority of the Rockefeller family resided, much of decibel explanations, she gathered the nature was just 31 miles away and a horse-drawn car- of my request, I was ushered away from the riage could make the journey to the estate in the land, tour by two elderly women carrying walkie- less than two hours. It was the perfect family talkies, taken down a long flight of wooden retreat, a temporary escape from city life.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Support for the New Economy Neva Goodwin Tufts University
    Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies Volume 4 Article 7 Issue 1 Winter, Caring Democracy 3-2-2017 Core Support for the New Economy Neva Goodwin Tufts University Follow this and additional works at: http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps Recommended Citation Goodwin, Neva (2017) "Core Support for the New Economy," Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps/vol4/iss1/7 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License The Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Authors retain ownership of their articles, which are made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial license (CC BY-NC 4.0). Core Support for the New Economy Acknowledgements With appreciation to Matt Alpert and Mitch Stallman for skilled and thoughtful research and editing, and to Brandon Taylor for estimates of time and cost. This article is available in Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies: http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps/vol4/iss1/7 Goodwin: Core Support for the New Economy CORE SUPPORT FOR THE NEW ECONOMY Neva Goodwin, PhD Abstract This paper proposes an income guarantee called Core Support (CS), defined as compensation for household activities such as childcare, food preparation, care of elderly or ill persons in the home, and maintenance of the home and of household vehicles and appliances. The immediate goals of the proposal are to highlight, through compensation, the reality that the productive activities carried on in households are of essential importance for the whole economy and society, and to enable the people who carry out these essential activities to do so without having to short-change the care work because of the need to earn money through the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-World Economics Review Please Click Here to Support This Journal and the WEA
    sanity, humanity and science probably the world's most read economics journal real-world economics review Please click here to support this journal and the WEA - Subscribers: 26,421 subscribe RWER Blog ISSN 1755-9472 - A journal of the World Economics Association (WEA) 14,468 members, join - Sister open access journals: Economic Thought and World Economic Review back issues Trumponomics: causes and consequences Part I - Issue no. 78, 22 March 2017 Preface 2 Trumponomics: everything to fear including fear itself? 3 Jamie Morgan Can Trump overcome secular stagnation? 20 James K. Galbraith Trump through a Polanyi lens: considering community well-being 28 Anne Mayhew Trump is Obama’s legacy. Will this break up the Democratic Party? 36 Michael Hudson Causes and consequences of President Donald Trump 44 Ann Pettifor Explaining the rise of Donald Trump 54 Marshall Auerback Class and Trumponomics 62 David F. Ruccio Trump's Growthism: its roots in neoclassical economic theory 86 Herman Daly Trumponomics: causes and prospects 98 L. Randall Wray The fall of the US middle class and the hair-raising ascent of Donald Trump 112 Steven Pressman Mourning in America: Trump and the traumas of the twenty-first century 125 Neva Goodwin Honest Abe was a co-op dude: how the Donald can save America from 132 capital despotism Stephen T. Ziliak Prolegomenon to a defense of the City of Gold 141 David A. Westbrook Trump’s bait and switch: job creation in the midst of welfare state sabotage 148 Pavlina R. Tcherneva Can “Trumponomics” extend the recovery? 159 Stephanie Kelton Board of Editors, past contributors, submissions and etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 30633 Front Matterv2
    ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND Annual Report 2000 ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND, INC. Madison Avenue New York, New York - Telephone: .. Facsimile: .. E-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: www.rbf.org POCANTICO CONFERENCE CENTER OF THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND Lake Road Pocantico Hills, New York - Telephone: .. Facsimile: .. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © , Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. Design: H Plus Incorporated Printing: Finlay Printing Printed on Recycled Paper Contents 5 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR 11 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT ABOUT THE ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND 17 The Rockefeller Brothers Fund 18 Grantmaking Programs 20 Other Programs 21 How to Apply for a Grant 23 Asian Cultural Council ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND PROGRAMS 27 Sustainable Resource Use 35 Global Security 41 Nonprofit Sector 47 Education 51 New York City 55 South Africa 59 Arts and Culture 63 Health 69 Pocantico Programs 77 Ramon Magsaysay Award Foundation 81 Grants Paid in 2000 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS 107 Financial Report 124 Trustees, Officers, and Staff A Message from the Chair The years and have been a time of new growth and transition at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. After the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation merged with the RBF in July , the trustees formed a Strategic Review Committee and initiated a systematic review of the Fund’s grantmaking programs that will not be completed until . In July Colin G. Campbell, who had been president of the Fund since , left to become president of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. In late , the trustees unanimously elected Stephen B. Heintz as the new president of the Fund. He assumed his new responsibilities on February , .
    [Show full text]
  • The David Rockefeller Fund at 30 Table of Contents
    LEADING WITH LOVE AND GRATITUDE: THE DAVID ROCKEFELLER FUND AT 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ...........................................................................vii Origins ...........................................................................01 Place: 1989–2000 .........................................................05 Family: 2001–2009 .......................................................11 Evolution: 2010–2014 ...................................................25 © Copyright 2020 The David Rockefeller Fund Growth: 2015–2019 .....................................................43 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 900, New York, NY 10115 Afterword .......................................................................92 FIRST EDITION Appendices ....................................................................94 Written and researched by Bethany Wall Designed by Lizanne Hart Design Printed by Geller Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. The David Rockefeller Fund is a family foundation inspired by the vision and generosity of our founders, Printed on chlorine-free, 100% post-consumer recycled paper produced with windpower. David and Peggy Rockefeller, to foster and embody a more just, creative, and flourishing world. PREFACE WHEN MY GRANDPARENTS, DAVID AND PEGGY ROCKEFELLER, established the David Rockefeller Fund in 1989 as a tool of convenience for local giving to their home communities outside New York City, what future did they envision for it? Philanthropic
    [Show full text]
  • Philanthropy Report 2020
    College of the Atlantic Philanthropy Report Fiscal Year 2020 COA Board of Trustees TRUSTEE OFFICERS LIFE TRUSTEES Mr. Philip S.J. Moriarty, Chair, Hinsdale, IL Mr. Samuel M. Hamill, Jr., Princeton, NJ Mrs. Marthann Samek, Vice Chair, New York, NY Mr. John N. Kelly, Yarmouth, ME Ms. Beth Gardiner, Vice Chair, London, UK Mr. William V.P. Newlin, Washington, DC Mr. Hank Schmelzer, Vice Chair, Somesville, ME Mr. John Reeves, Bar Harbor, ME Mr. Ronald E. Beard, Secretary, Bar Harbor, ME Mr. Henry D. Sharpe, Jr., North Kingstown, RI Mr. Jay McNally ’84, Treasurer, Bar Harbor, ME TRUSTEE EMERITI TRUSTEE MEMBERS Dr. David Hackett Fischer, Wayland, MA Mrs. Cynthia Baker, Washington, DC Mr. William G. Foulke, Jr., Bedford, NY Mr. Timothy Bass, Alexandria, VA Mr. George B.E. Hambleton, Wadmalaw, SC Mr. Michael Boland ’94, Bar Harbor, ME Mrs. Elizabeth D. Hodder, Cambridge, MA Mrs. Alyne Cistone, Mount Desert, ME Mr. Philip B. Kunhardt III ’77, Waccabuc, NY Mr. Barclay Corbus, San Francisco, CA Dr. Phyllis Anina Moriarty, Chestnut Hill, MA Mrs. Sarah Currie-Halpern, New York, NY Mr. Hamilton Robinson, Jr., New York, NY Mrs. Beth Gardiner, London, UK Dr. John Wilmerding, New York, NY Mrs. Amy Yeager Geier, Williamstown, MA Dr. Marie Griffith, St. Louis, MO* EX OFFICIO Mr. H. Winston Holt IV, Darien, CT Darron Collins '92, President, Bar Harbor, ME Ms. Cookie Horner, Bar Harbor, ME Mr. Nicholas Lapham, Washington, DC Ms. Casey Mallinckrodt, Richmond, VA Mr. Anthony Mazlish, Chevy Chase, MD Ms. Lili Pew, Seal Harbor, ME Dr. Nadia Rosenthal, Seal Harbor, ME Ms. Abby Rowe (’98), Mount Desert, ME Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Neva R. Goodwin 11 Lowell St
    CURRICULUM VITAE Neva R. Goodwin 11 Lowell St. Cambridge, MA, 02138, U.S.A. Phone: (617) 491-0162 Fax: (617) 868-7919 Email: [email protected] Home Page at ECI, Wikipedia entry, ResearchGate profile October 2019 EDUCATION 1987 Boston University PhD in Economics 1982 Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government Masters in Public Administration 1966 Harvard College B.A. in English Literature; Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa PERSONAL Born in 1944 Two children ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2019-Present Economics in Context Initiative, GDP Center, Boston University Distinguished Fellow 1993–Present Global Development And Environment Institute, Tufts University Co-director 1993–Present Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Research Associate 1991–1993 Program for the Study of Sustainable Change and Development, Tufts Co-Director 1988–1990 World Development Institute, Boston University Research Associate and Coordinator of the Global Issues Program 1986–1990 The African Studies Center, Boston University Director of Program Development 1985–1986 Department of Economics, Boston University Lecturer Spring 1984 Department of Sociology, Boston University Lecturer BOOKS Principles of Economics in Context: Second Edition, Neva Goodwin, Jonathan Harris, Julie Nelson, Pratistha Joshi Rajkarnikar, Brian Roach, and Mariano Torras; Routledge, 2019. Microeconomics In Context: Fourth Edition1, Neva Goodwin, Jonathan Harris, Julie Nelson, Pratistha Joshi Rajkarnikar, Brian Roach, and Mariano Torras; Routledge, 2019. 1 Third Edition, Neva Goodwin, Jonathan Harris, Julie A. Nelson, Brian Roach and Mariano Torras; Routledge, 2014. Second Edition, Neva Goodwin, Julie A. Nelson, Frank Ackerman and Thomas Weisskopf; M.E. Sharpe, 2009. First Edition, Microeconomia: Organizzazioni Sociali e Conservazione delle Risorse (Microeconomics: Social Neva R.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Climate Change: What Does It Mean for Our Way of Life? What Is the Best Future We Can Hope For?
    GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER NO. 08-01 An Overview of Climate Change: What does it mean for our way of life? What is the best future we can hope for? Neva Goodwin March 2008 Tufts University Medford MA 02155, USA http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae ©Copyright 2008 Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University GDAE Working Paper No. 08-01: An Overview of Climate Change Abstract This paper starts with the question of whether climate change will require a significant reduction of consumption among the richer people in the world, and ends with the most optimistic picture the author can conjure up, of the world in the year 2075. That hopeful picture is of a world in which inequalities – among and within nations – have been substantially reduced. The challenges and adjustments confronting humanity in the coming decades provide an opportunity that could be used to mitigate climate change in ways that can improve the circumstances of the poor. Ecological reasons to reduce throughput of energy and materials in economic systems urge the abandonment of high- consumption life-styles. The 21st century will be an era of many losses, but it is conceivable that societies will successfully make the transition from goals of economic growth, as understood in the 20th century, to goals of maintaining and increasing sustainable well-being. 1 GDAE Working Paper No. 08-01: An Overview of Climate Change An Overview of Climate Change: What does it mean for our way of life? What is the best future we can hope for? Neva Goodwin 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Family Philanthropy
    Lessons from Family Philanthropy rbf.org /75/family-philanthropy 12/1/2016 The Growth of Family Foundations The Foundation Center in Washington, D.C. defines a family foundation as one that derives its funds from the members of a single family, with at least one family member serving as an officer or board member. By this definition, there are over 40,000 family foundations in the United States in 2016, making grants totaling more than $21.3 billion a year. This represents a sizable increase from the roughly 3,200 family foundations in 2001, then giving $6.8 billion annually. However, there is enormous range among family foundations in size and scope. More than 60 percent of today’s family foundations have assets of less than $1 million. Half of all family foundations make less than $50,000 in grants annually. Although statistics were not compiled in quite the same way at the time, it is estimated that the Rockefeller Brothers Fund joined company with approximately 470 other family foundations when it was founded in 1940. The astonishing rise in family foundations may be explained by several perceived advantages, including tax breaks. But perhaps more compelling, family foundations offer donors the means to shape and control their giving. They also can design programmatic objectives to have greater impact than individual donations to established charitable organizations. Furthermore, family foundations have fewer restrictions than donor-advised funds, which are administered through investment funds and do not necessarily provide the chance to design a comprehensive philanthropic program. Launching family foundations is often the expression of donors’ desires to establish a lasting legacy and to instill in future generations the importance of giving.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 475 Riverside Drive | Suite 900 | New York, NY 1o115 www.drfund.org 1 “It is my sincere hope that the David Rockefeller Fund will become an effective vehicle to further the philanthropic goals of my family…Our family continues to be united in the belief that those who have benefited the most from our nation’s economic system have a special responsibility to give back to our society in meaningful ways.” David Rockefeller June 12, 1915 – March 20, 2017 2 HISTORY The David Rockefeller Fund was established in 1989 by David Rockefeller and his wife, Peggy, to carry out their annual charitable giving in communities where they had homes outside New York City. In 2001, David Rockefeller expanded the Fund and invited his children, grandchildren, and their spouses to take a more active role in the Fund, with the idea of transferring to them the family’s philanthropic legacy. In 2018, it was governed by a board of directors with 14 family members and two independent directors. GUIDING PRINCIPLES In all of its work, the Fund seeks to address the root causes of problems, working locally, nationally, and now globally and guided by the following principles: FAMILY LEGACY RESPECT We seek to honor the philanthropic We respect our grantees as equal partners traditions and values exemplified by David in the work we do. Our general approach and Peggy Rockefeller, recognizing the is to identify people and institutions doing responsibility that we have to be active and important work and then to support them in engaged participants in our communities, as ways they will find most meaningful, without well as in the larger world.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Centuries of Rockefeller Family Philanthropy
    an entrepreneurial spirit: ABOUT ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that helps donors to create thoughtful, effective philanthropy throughout Three Centuries of the world. Headquartered in New York City, it traces its antecedents to John D. Rockefeller, Sr., who in 1891 began to professionally manage Rockefeller Family his philanthropy “as if it were a business.” Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors provides research and counsel on charitable giving, develops Philanthropy philanthropic programs, and offers complete program, administrative and management services for foundations and trusts. Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors currently advises on and manages more than $100 million in annual giving in more than 20 countries. 437 Madison Avenue 101 Second Street 37th Floor 24th Floor New York, NY 10022 San Francisco, CA 94105 (212) 812-4330 (415) 543-0733 www.rockpa.org table of contents 2 Foreword Melissa A. Berman, President and CEO, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 4 Preface Eileen Rockefeller Growald, Founding Chair, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 5 The Rockefeller Family’s Philanthropic Beginnings: A Brief History Peter J. Johnson, Historian, Author and Rockefeller Family Associate Edited by Donzelina A. Barroso 20 Values, Rituals, and Communication in Rockefeller Family Philanthropy Eileen Rockefeller Growald, Founding Chair, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 31 Learning Philanthropy: Opportunity and Relationship-Building Among the Younger Generations Peter O’Neill Allison Whipple Rockefeller Theo Spencer Penny Fujiko Willgerodt, Vice President & Senior Philanthropic Advisor, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 45 Personal Engagement and Passion in Philanthropy: Two Generations Share their Experiences David Rockefeller, Sr. David Rockefeller, Jr. © 2005, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 64 Biographies E This book is printed on paper made from 30% post-consumer content.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Economy and Civilized Economics: Essentials for Sustainable Development Neva Goodwin
    GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER NO. 01-01 Civil Economy and Civilized Economics: Essentials for Sustainable Development Neva Goodwin January 2001 Tufts University Medford MA 02155, USA http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae Ó Copyright 2001 Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University G-DAE Working Paper No. 01-01: “Civil Economy and Civilized Economics" Civil Economy and Civilized Economics: 1 Essentials for Sustainable Development Neva Goodwin [email protected] (Draft Copy: Not for Quotation) Contents Abstract Introduction 1. The Civil Context 1.1. Goals, Values and Ethics as Social Capital 1.2. Ethics in Civil Society 1.3. An Example: The UN Conferences 1.4. Ethics as Behavior Rules for Situations of Interdependence 2. A New Kind of Science for the Current Mess 2.1. Characteristics of the Environmental Mess 2.2. Responses to the Environmental Mess: Starting with Values 2.3. Participatory Science 2.4. Mixing "is" and "ought to be" 3. How Sustainable Development is Saving Economics from Itself 3.1. Some Problems in Neoclassical Economics 3.2. Enter Sustainable Development 3.3. Defining the Goals 3.4. Additional Contrasts Between Neoclassical Economics and Sustainable Development 4. The Reciprocal Influence Between Economic Ideas and Social Realities 4.1. The Danger of a Particular Bias in Economic Theory 4.2. A First Step to Reforming Economics 4.3. The Limits to Internalizing Externalities 5. A Balance Between Equity and Efficiency 5.1. Some Reasons for Optimism 5.2. Why Justice is Necessary for Sustainability 5.2.1. The Need to Reduce the Material Flow 5.2.2.
    [Show full text]