DOCSLIB.ORG

Brexit on the Backburner BRIEF POLICY Citizens’ Rights and the Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement in a Pandemic SEPTEMBER 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brexit on the Backburner BRIEF POLICY Citizens’ Rights and the Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement in a Pandemic SEPTEMBER 2020 EUROPE Brexit on the Backburner POLICY BRIEF Citizens’ rights and the implementation of the withdrawal agreement in a pandemic www.mpieurope.org SEPTEMBER 2020 BY ALIYYAH AHAD AND MONICA ANDRIESCU At a time when information outreach and support Executive Summary with the residence registration process should have been stepping up, especially for hard-to-reach After years of uncertainty and a series of delays, the groups with limited digital access or literacy, the United Kingdom formally left the European Union public-health crisis and its economic aftershocks on 31 January 2020. As part of the withdrawal agree- have shifted priorities and attention away from ment, which governs the United Kingdom’s depar- Brexit. They have also put additional strain on pub- ture, there is a transition period until 31 December lic administrations, including those responsible for 2020. This is followed by a grace period of at least six residency. Governments are in a race against time months, until 30 June 2021, in which those eligible to finalise their plans by the end of the transition can acquire a new post-Brexit status. The citizens’ period to implement the withdrawal agreement at a rights portion of the agreement sets out the frame- national level, draft and adopt legislation and guide- lines, train officials, and conduct outreach to target work for continued legal residence for EU nationals groups. in the United Kingdom and UK citizens in the re- maining EU Member States, as well as their families. Governments can, however, unilaterally decide to re- quire EU and UK nationals living on their territory to Just as EU Member States were apply for a new residence status, and in some cases starting to switch gears from no-deal failure to comply by the imposed deadline will result scenario preparation to planning in the loss of lawful immigration status and the asso- how to implement the withdrawal ciated rights. Against such a tight timeline, and with agreement, the world was turned such serious repercussions for mobile Europeans upside down by the COVID-19 and families, governments have a very small mar- pandemic. gin for error in designing and implementing these post-Brexit status systems. But just as EU Member Only a few governments have even announced their States were starting to switch gears from no-deal plans on citizens’ rights, let alone begun implemen- scenario preparation to planning how to implement Registered charity number: 1115476 tation. The United Kingdom, home to approximately the withdrawal agreement, the world was turned 3.7 million EU citizens—the vast majority of the upside down by the COVID-19 pandemic. approximately 4.6 million people potentially eligible BREXIT ON THE BACKBURNER BREXIT ON THE BACKBURNER for post-Brexit status—is the furthest along, having policymakers will need to make the most of this lim- rolled out its pilot EU Settlement Scheme in 2019 ited time to ‘pandemic proof’ their implementation before scaling it up. But among the 26 EU countries plans against potential second and third waves of with responsibilities for citizens’ rights (referred to COVID-19 and to prevent vulnerable groups from in this policy brief as the ‘EU-26’)—Ireland is exempt falling through the cracks. Among the steps govern- because of the Common Travel Area with the United ments should consider are: Kingdom—only Italy, Malta, and the Netherlands had launched registration schemes before the pan- ► Investing in (joint) communications demic began. Social-distancing measures to stop and smart outreach. It is urgent for the spread of the virus put the brakes on any in-per- governments to publicly announce what kind son parts of the process, such as collecting biometric of registration process they will implement, data for residence cards, or retrieving and submit- what documentary evidence will be required, ting documents required to file an application. And and the registration timeline so that citizens at least one Member State, France, which has the can prepare. Communications on these second-largest population of UK nationals in EU-26, topics should also be tailored to their target was forced to delay post-Brexit status implementa- populations, for example by including a tion plans from July to October 2020 in order to ad- mixture of online and offline resources; made dress other administrative backlogs. available in applicants’ native languages; and disseminated through official channels With less than four months until and schools, care homes, hospitals, and other institutions that come into contact the end of the transition period ... with vulnerable groups. Governments can policymakers will need to make the also pool resources to co-create websites most of this limited time to ‘pandemic and video templates that can be adapted to proof’ their implementation plans. different national contexts, or to staff a joint helpline. For mobile EU and UK citizens caught in the middle ► Streamlining processes and keeping of this perfect storm of Brexit and public-health cri- evidence requirements minimal. sis, the health and economic effects of the pandemic Application systems should incorporate have exacerbated existing vulnerabilities. Among a mixture of online and offline options so the groups most affected are families that have they will not be totally disrupted by future members who are third-country nationals and are lockdowns, should they occur. This hybrid separated by international travel restrictions, as well approach will also help ensure they are as pensioners with pre-existing medical needs. But it accessible to applicants who are not tech has also created new risk categories, such as for the savvy. In addition, governments should newly unemployed (including frontier and seasonal consider waiving traditional requirements workers) who may no longer meet the conditions of to obtain (permanent) residency, such as the European Union’s Free Movement Directive— on being physically present (or ‘habitually the foundation of the withdrawal agreement—and resident’) in a country for at least six months may also have difficulties accessing benefits. With in a calendar year, especially for persons less than four months until the end of the transition trapped abroad due to travel restrictions, period, and no moves (yet) to formally extend it, or on having documents translated and MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE | 2 MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE | 3 BREXIT ON THE BACKBURNER BREXIT ON THE BACKBURNER notarised, which can be costly and time- grace period for potential applicants to consuming for applicants. register. Monitoring data and clearly defined benchmarks can also help governments ► Building up support for civil-society determine if and when to unilaterally organisations. Such organisations are well extend the grace period, for example if positioned to help UK nationals in the EU- registrations are far below expectations. 26 navigate registration processes. The UK Governments should also establish clear government launched a GBP 3 million effort and regular feedback channels with civil- to assist particularly vulnerable Britons, but this only covers a handful of EU-26 Member society stakeholders, who can help frontload States. With limited room for error or delay improvements, such as by reviewing between when post-Brexit residence systems application templates, communications start operating and when they end, civil- strategies, and guidance for frontline staff to society organisations could conduct outreach reduce the need for subsequent changes. to hard-to-reach groups (including those in It is impossible to predict how the coronavirus remote and rural areas) and thus help prevent pandemic will evolve in the coming months, but it eligible people from missing the deadline or threatens to make implementing the withdrawal submitting incomplete applications. They can agreement’s provisions on citizens’ rights more dif- also support awareness-raising among the general public, including employers, about ficult, while also increasing those citizens’ vulnera- what the post-Brexit status means and which bilities. But regardless of COVID-19, Brexit will have rights come with it. The UK government life-altering impacts for approximately 4.6 million has also provided funding to charities EU nationals and UK citizens, as well as an untold and voluntary organisations to support number of their family members. Governments on vulnerable EU citizens applying to the EU either side of the Channel bear a huge responsibility Settlement Scheme in the United Kingdom. to ensure that all eligible persons are able to register But as is the case for organisations in the and receive a post-Brexit status. The pandemic and EU-26, the funding will end in March 2021. the economic upheaval it has brought have shone Its extension would enable organisations to a spotlight on how important it is for members of continue providing these essential services, a society to be able to access the full spectrum of reach those most at risk of not applying by supports and benefits to which they are entitled; the deadline, and recover the time lost to the for mobile EU and UK nationals, this includes those pandemic and lockdown. linked to their rights under the withdrawal agree- ment. Residency is the first hurdle—but it is not the ► Establishing monitoring and feedback loops from the very beginning. Such end of the race. And with the outlook of reaching a mechanisms can track both user experience trade agreement between the European Union and and performance, and thus help governments the United Kingdom looking increasingly grim, it will identify and address bottlenecks or be all the more vital to provide assurances to mobile discrepancies in how applications are Europeans and Britons that their rights under the processed by different local authorities. withdrawal agreement are guaranteed and will be Even if the transition period is not extended, fairly implemented, regardless of the shape of future states can decide unilaterally to extend the economic and political relations across the Channel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Windrush, Shame and Scandal: Race, Class, Gender, and Immigration in a British Context
    Windrush, Shame and Scandal: Race, Class, Gender, and Immigration in a British Context “I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, I am ungrateful to these teachers”.i This paper explores the issues of race, class and gender at the epicenter of British immigration policy, with particular reference to the lived experiences and reality of the Caribbean “Windrush generation” an estimated 500,000 – 700,000 people in the UK, who arrived from the Caribbean between 1948 and 1971 and their descendants.ii This entails exploring the socio-historical context of the migration of the ”Windrush” Caribbean people to Britain and the experiences of themselves and their descendants in British society. Of necessity, we also review the history of immigration patterns control in the UK. This is a critical exercise in view of the current “Windrush crisis” occasioned by the discriminatory implementation and abuse of Immigration law to deport and disadvantage many of the Windrush generation and their descendants.iii In our review parallel streams or race, class and gender are seen to turbulently converge in the everyday lived experiences of Black people in Britain, giving rise to fractures and fault lines in the fabric and landscape of British society. It is crucial that we begin our review and place this crisis in a socio-legal historical context to ensure analytical veracity. In this regard, it is important to consider that the internecine European tribal conflict, known as “World War
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony Joseph & Friends Windrush: a Celebration
    Anthony Joseph & Friends Windrush: A Celebration Start time: 7.30pm Running time: 2 hours 50 minutes including interval Please note all timings are approximate and subject to change Arwa Haider talks to Anthony Joseph and Jason Yarde about putting together a concert to mark the seismic contribution the Caribbean diaspora has made to British culture. On 22 June 1948, passengers disembarked from the HMT Empire Windrush at Tilbury Dock in Essex. Several hundred of these passengers had boarded the ship in Kingston, Jamaica, and many had travelled from around the Caribbean to Britain: a country inviting immigration from Commonwealth nations as it sought to rebuild itself after WWII. The Windrush generation and its legacy marked a vital sea change for British culture. Tonight, British-Trinidadian poet, novelist, musician and academic Anthony Joseph celebrates the far-reaching impact of the Windrush and the Caribbean diaspora in Britain, with a line-up that is evocative, inspirational and multi-generational. ‘How do we look at 70 years of musical and cultural impact?’ reflects Joseph, when asked about his starting point for the show. ‘Caribbean people have been coming to Britain since the 1800s, but since the 1940s, the diaspora has gone through a series of waves of consciousness. The Windrush generation was coming to what they considered the mother country, trying to fit in and find a place, yet experiencing rejection and denial. We need to address the fact that that the Caribbean is not just Jamaica; I wanted to look at the influence of Trinidad in the 1950s, and how calypso merged into jazz.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimacy and Citizenships Anna Waldstein
    Special Issue — Edited by I. Pardo and G. B. Prato Urbanities, Vol. 9 · Supplement 2 · April 2019 On Legitimacy: Multidisciplinary Reflections © 2019 Urbanities Legitimacy and Citizenships Anna Waldstein (University of Kent, U. K.) [email protected] Pardo and Prato’s edited volume on Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights (2019) raises important questions about the relationships between authority, power and trust, especially (though not exclusively) in the realm of governance. As a medical anthropologist with long-term interests in the use of hand-made, botanically-based remedies (including cannabis), issues related to the legitimacy of these medicines have been implicit (if not explicitly addressed) in my research. However, after reading several of the chapters in Pardo and Prato (2019), I realized that the relationship between legitimacy and citizenship is actually of greatest significance for (and has the most resonance with) my work. As they explain in the introduction to the book, governance and law fail when they do not meet the challenge of establishing a working relationship between formal law and people’s cultural requirements. Thus, ethnographic studies of legitimacy at different levels of power raise fundamental questions about citizenship. This brief essay focuses on issues of legitimacy in relation to three anthropological conceptualizations of citizenship: biological citizenship (Rose and Novas 2003), cultural citizenship (Ong 1995; Goldade 2011) and spiritual citizenship (Guzman Garcia 2016). It takes inspiration from various chapters in Pardo and Prato (2019) and other related literature on citizenship, and draws on some of my own ethnographic work with Jamaican migrants in the United Kingdom.1 I show that while legitimate claims to biological citizenship are defined by both government and medical institutions, they must compete with the grassroots legitimacy that underpins cultural and spiritual citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 1
    Wednesday Volume 662 19 June 2019 No. 316 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 19 June 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 219 19 JUNE 2019 220 Drew Hendry: According to every piece of the Secretary House of Commons of State’s own Government’s analysis, there is no version of Brexit that fails to harm Scotland. New YouGov Wednesday 19 June 2019 polling shows that Tory members would prefer Scotland to be an independent country, rather than stopping Brexit. Which choice should the Scottish Secretary make: The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock a devastating no-deal Brexit Britain, or giving the people of Scotland the choice to be an independent European nation? PRAYERS David Mundell: Mr Speaker, it will not surprise you to hear me say that Scotland has already made its [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] choice on whether to be independent or part of the United Kingdom. The poll to which the hon. Gentleman referred was based on a false premise. This Government are about delivering Brexit and keeping Scotland at the Oral Answers to Questions heart of the United Kingdom. John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) (Con): Will the Secretary of State tell us how much SCOTLAND money the Scottish Government have given to local authorities in Scotland to prepare for our exit from the The Secretary of State was asked— European Union? Leaving the EU David Mundell: As far as I understand it, the UK Government have made more than £100 million available to the Scottish Government to help to prepare for 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Windrush Generation
    The Windrush Generation London, United Kingdom 07/06/2018 Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker This portfolio encompasses every possible aspect of the Windrush generation. There is a specific focus on the history of the generation which gives a solid understanding of who these people are before moving onto the current scandal that has been at the forefront of UK media for the most of early 2018. We included a vast history of the Windrush generation, personal stories and responses from both the government and the public in regards to the current situation while also looking at what this all means for immigration and the cultural impact on a much broader scale. Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker 1 Contents Page 1. Introduction ……………………………………………. 3 2. Stories a. History of the Windrush Generation ……………. 5 b. Notting Hill and Brixton Riots …………………. 10 c. The Windrush Scandal - What is it …………….. 16 d. Public Response - Windrush scandal attempts to push out generation, only brings Londoners closer together …………………………………... 20 e. Stories Through Portraits: Windrushers 70th Anniversary………………………………………. 24 f. From Jamaica to London: the Story of Alfred …... 28 3. Website a. Website Design …………………………………… 31 4. Reflection a. Reflection Report ………………………………….. 33 5. Sources a. Oral Sources ……………………………………….. 40 b. Written/Literature Sources ………………………... 43 6. Miscellaneous a. Print out of electronic timeline …………………….. 46 Sara Maryniak and Cathal Charker 2 Introduction As a result of the losses during the Second World War, the British government began to encourage mass immigration from the colonies of the British Empire and Commonwealth to fill shortages in the labour market. The Windrush generation became those who migrated from the Caribbean between 1948 and the 1970’s.
    [Show full text]
  • 854 Final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to The
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.12.2020 COM(2020) 854 final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the Brexit Adjustment Reserve EN EN ANNEX I Allocation method for the pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve The pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve shall be distributed between the Member States according to the following methodology: 1. Each Member State’s share from pre-financing of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve is determined as the sum of a factor linked to the fish caught in the waters that belong to the UK Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and a factor linked to trade with the UK. 2. The factor linked to fish caught in the UK EEZ is used to allocate EUR 600 million. The factor linked to trade is used to allocate EUR 3 400 million. Both amounts are expressed in 2018 prices. 3. The factor linked to fisheries is determined on the basis of the following criterion and by applying the following steps: a) share of each Member State of the total value of the fish caught in the UK EEZ; b) these shares are increased for Member States with fisheries that have an above average dependency on the fish caughts in the UK EEZ and decreased for the ones that have a below average dependency as following: (i) for each Member State, the value of fish caught in UK EEZ as a percentage of the total value of fish caught by that Member State is expressed as an index of the EU average (index of dependency); (ii) the initial share of the value of fish caught in the UK EEZ is adjusted by multiplying it with the Member State’s index of dependency; (iii) these adjusted shares are rescaled to ensure that the sum of all Member States’ shares equals 100%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brexit Vote: a Divided Nation, a Divided Continent
    Sara Hobolt The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Hobolt, Sara (2016) The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23 (9). pp. 1259-1277. ISSN 1466-4429 DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785 © 2016 Routledge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67546/ Available in LSE Research Online: November 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent Sara B. Hobolt London School of Economics and Political Science, UK ABSTRACT The outcome of the British referendum on EU membership sent shockwaves through Europe. While Britain is an outlier when it comes to the strength of Euroscepticism, the anti- immigration and anti-establishment sentiments that produced the referendum outcome are gaining strength across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore on the Thames : Model for a Post‑Brexit UK?
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Singapore on the Thames : Model for a Post‑Brexit UK? Martin, David 2020 Martin, D. (2020). Singapore on the Thames : Model for a Post‑Brexit UK? (RSIS Commentaries, No. 020). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137261 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 07:03:19 SGT Singapore on the Thames: Model for a Post-Brexit UK? By David Martin SYNOPSIS Last week, the UK formally exited the European Union. As it charts a new destiny outside the EU post-Brexit, the domestic debate is whether it should adopt the Singapore model of economic self-reliance. Can ‘Singapore on the Thames’ work? COMMENTARY ‘SINGAPORE ON the Thames’ has become an unfortunate shorthand for what many Brexiteers laud as a model for Britain’s economy, now that it has formally left the European Union on 31 January 2020. Unfortunate for Singapore because it promotes a flawed view of its economic success and an international image it could do without. Unfortunate for the United Kingdom because the version of the Singapore model it promotes is both undeliverable and certain to make any trade deal with the EU more difficult, if not impossible, to deliver. Singapore’s Image in Britain The image of Singapore being promoted is that of a low tax (even tax haven), unregulated, small government laissez faire paradise. The advocates of ‘Singapore on the Thames’ either ignore or are ignorant of the fact that on top of a relatively low tax rate the Central Provident Fund compels workers and employers to contribute 37% of wages and salaries.
    [Show full text]
  • BREXIT DIVORCE BILL” Eulalia Rubio | Senior Research Fellow, Jacques Delors Institute
    TRIBUNE 21 NOVEMBER 2017 UNDERSTANDING THE “BREXIT DIVORCE BILL” Eulalia Rubio | Senior research fellow, Jacques Delors Institute T he UK’s financial settlement, or so-called “Brexit divorce bill”, refers to the expected payment the United Kingdom has to make to the EU to honour its share of the financial commitments jointly undertaken by EU countries while the UK was a member of the European Union. In media and in public discussions, there is some con- remaining EU-27 should adjust the MFF to reflect the fusion with regard to the nature of this payment and fact that one of the biggest net contributors is leaving. the legal and political arguments supporting the EU’s However, enlargement differs from withdrawal in that claim. The UK media tends to label this payment as an it is a decision adopted unanimously by EU member “exit bill” the EU is imposing on the UK to open trade states, not imposed by one of them on the others. talks. Brexit bill talks are also frequently portrayed as classical, zero-sum money negotiations. In reality, dis- It is also important to note that part of spending com- agreements on the amount of the bill hide more pro- mitments linked to this MFF will be executed after found discrepancies regarding the nature and compo- 2020. This is the famous RAL or “Reste-à-Liquider”, sition of this payment and, ultimately, in relation to the that is, the amount of spending authorised in EU nature of EU membership and the purpose of Brexit annual budgets but still not executed.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Tax Competition Between the UK and the EU27
    Brexit: tax competition between the UK and the EU27 Since the outcome of the Brexit referendum there has been speculation about whether any UK/EU trade agreement would allow the UK to position itself as a tax haven. The UK/EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement imposes a number of restrictions on the UK, including subsidy controls and commitments to maintain certain OECD tax standards. Outside of these restrictions, opportunities remain for the UK to make its tax regime more competitive as compared to its EU27 neighbours, but it seems likely that divergences between the tax regimes of these jurisdictions will in any event develop over time. Throughout the various stages of the Brexit negotiations, there has been speculation about what the final terms of any trade agreement would say about tax; in particular, whether the deal might allow the UK to position itself as the media-dubbed ‘Singapore-on-Thames’. The broad idea being that the UK could set itself up as a tax haven boldly neighbouring the EU27 jurisdictions by aggressively reducing its corporate tax rate, offering targeted tax incentives to attract businesses to the UK and diluting rules countering tax avoidance. The question is whether the Brexit trade deal, as agreed at the eleventh hour, allows for this. The ‘Singapore-on-Thames’ concept can be traced back to comments made by the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, in January 2017, that in the event of a no-deal Brexit the UK would be forced to change its economic model to remain competitive. Boris Johnson, in his capacity as both foreign secretary and subsequently prime minister, fanned the flames of this idea with comments about seizing the opportunity of Brexit to reform the UK’s tax system and simplify regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL 36, ISSUE 3 on Race and Colonialism WELCOME to THIS EDITION of ANVIL
    ANVIL Journal of Theology and Mission Faultlines in Mission: Reflections VOL 36, ISSUE 3 on Race and Colonialism WELCOME TO THIS EDITION OF ANVIL ANVIL: Journal of Theology and Mission Lusa Nsenga-Ngoy VOL 36, ISSUE 3 2 ANVIL: JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY AND MISSION – VOLUME 36: ISSUE 3 THE EDITORIAL While it is premature to assess the legacy of this year in history, we can certainly agree that 2020 has brought to the fore the imperative need to revisit the past, paying particular attention to societal and systemic fractures adversely impacting the lives of many around the globe. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, millions of people took to the streets of our cities demanding radical change, and calling for the toppling of an old order and its symbols of power, objectification and commodification. This issue of Anvil is inspired by a willingness to Harvey Kwiyani’s article offers us a crystal-clear view of offer an introspective response to this global wave how white privilege and white supremacy have provided of protest calling for racial justice and asking with the buttresses for empire and have made mission in insistence whether black lives do indeed matter in our their own image. To illustrate this, he movingly weaves societies and institutions. It felt imperative to ask the his own story from his childhood in Malawi to living in question of Church Mission Society and its particular George Floyd’s city of Minneapolis to now forming part contribution to the subject both in its distant and more of the tiny minority of black and brown people who contemporary history.
    [Show full text]