DOCSLIB.ORG

The Electoral Commission T Street Great Peter London SW1P 2HW Te Fa [email protected] Are an Independent Body That Was

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Electoral Commission T Street Great Peter London SW1P 2HW Te Fa Info@Electoralcommission.Org.Uk Are an Independent Body That Was April 2004 Age of electoral majority Report and recommendations We are an independent body that was set up by the UK Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the UK by modernising Age of the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and The Electoral Commission Trevelyan House regulating political parties. Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW electoral majority Te l 020 7271 0500 4114/RP/04.04 Fax 020 7271 0505 © The Electoral Commission 2004 [email protected] ISBN: 1-904363-39-3 www.electoralcommission.org.uk Report and recommendations The Electoral Commission Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW Tel 020 7271 0500 Fax 020 7271 0505 [email protected] Mainwww.electoralcommission.org.uk headings The Electoral Commission We are an independent body that was set up by the UK Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the UK by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and regulating political parties. On 1 April 2002, The Boundary Committee for England (formerly the Local Government Commission for England) became a statutory committee of The Electoral Commission. Its duties include reviewing local electoral boundaries. Age of electoral majority Report and recommendations © The Electoral Commission 2004 ISBN: 1-904363-39-3 1 Contents Executive summary 3 4 Citizenship education 29 International comparators 3 Background 29 Minimum age limits and maturity 3 How important is citizenship education? 31 Citizenship education 4 Is citizenship education working? 32 What do the public think? 4 Citizenship post-16 36 Election turnout and wider participation 4 All or nothing? 5 5Public opinion 39 Conclusions and recommendations 5 The voting age – general public 39 1 Introduction 7 6 Election turnout and wider participation 45 The Electoral Commission 7 How important is turnout in this context? 45 Genesis of the project 7 Participation beyond elections 49 Scope 8 Priorities and principles 9 7 All or nothing? 53 Review process 9 Managing change 53 Consultation process 10 Variable ages? 54 Recommendations 11 Pilot schemes 55 2 International comparators 13 8 Conclusions and recommendations 59 The present context 13 Rationale 59 The Lower Saxony experience 15 Voting age 61 The importance of Candidacy age 62 international comparators 16 Appendices 3 Minimum age limits and maturity 19 Other minimum ages 19 Appendix A: Consultation activities What do we mean by maturity? 23 and media coverage 65 The importance of social awareness July 2003 65 and responsibility 24 August 66 The minimum candidacy age – September 66 ensuring greater maturity? 26 October 66 Post-October 67 Media coverage 67 2 Appendix B: Respondents to the consultation paper and consultation meetings 69 Academics 69 Councils 69 Political parties and groups 70 Politicians 71 Organisations 72 Young people, including youth groups, schools, and organisations representing young people 73 Others 76 Appendix C: Statistical breakdown of responses to consultation paper and surveys 79 Consultation paper questions 79 Responses to ICM survey, November 2003 81 Extracts from Nestlé Family Monitor/MORI survey 83 Appendix D: List of legal minimum ages 85 Appendix E: Recruitment and deployment of under 18s in the armed services of the UK 88 Policy considerations 89 Attachments 91 Description of safeguards maintained in respect of recruitment of under-18s into the armed forces of the United Kingdom 91 Draft Declaration to be made at ratification on the minimum age for recruitment into the armed forces of the United Kingdom 92 3 Executive summary We set out here our views and There have been growing calls to reduce the recommendations on the minimum voting and/or candidacy age as a way of encouraging participation in representative minimum age of voting and democracy by young people. The Electoral candidacy for public elections Commission has undertaken this review over the in the United Kingdom. last 12 months, partly in recognition of that trend, and partly in response to a specific request from young people that we ‘seriously consider the arguments for lowering the voting age’.1 International comparators Almost all countries have a minimum voting age of 18. The picture is less clear with candidacy, but most countries similar to the UK have the same minimum age for both voting and candidacy. The situation in other countries sets the context for the debate, but should not be the conclusive argument. Minimum age limits and maturity Much has been made of other rights that apply at 16, for example marriage, joining the armed forces, and liability to taxation, but the detail of some of these rights is often more complex than may appear (for example, the need to gain parental consent in order to exercise the right before age 18). Furthermore, the age at which rights and responsibilities accrue varies greatly and no other single right is directly comparable with the right to vote or stand at elections. In the absence of a wider debate about the general age of majority (which goes beyond the Commission’s expertise and remit), each right should therefore be considered ultimately in its own context. 1 Young people and politics, Children and Young People’s Unit, July 2002, page 41. (www.cypu.gov.uk/corporate/downloads/CYPU_AdultAW.pdf). Age of electoral majority: executive summary 4 Maturity is fundamental to the question of legal current state of citizenship teaching in minimum ages and the most important aspect schools. However, the Commission strongly of maturity in the context of electoral rights supports the principle of citizenship teaching, seems to be the development of social both during and beyond compulsory schooling. awareness and responsibility. All that we have Furthermore, were the subject to develop seen suggests that many young people under more fully, this may change the context for 18 would probably be ready to use the right to the debate on electoral rights. vote, but many others do not appear ready. Defining what is ‘sufficiently mature’ in relation What do the public think? to voting cannot be a precise test and must Most responses to our consultation supported therefore rest to a large extent on the views a voting age of 16, but more general opinion of society as a whole. In this regard a wider polling suggests strong support for keeping national debate about the general age of the current minimum. Even young people majority would be helpful, as it has been over themselves seem divided on whether they are 35 years since the last formal review. ready to be given voting rights at 16. Public opinion also seems opposed to lowering the Citizenship education candidacy age, but views on this appear less In the last few years there has been increasing strongly held. focus on citizenship teaching in formal education, although the way it is taught varies Electoral turnout and wider across the UK. It is not just factual political participation literacy that is important – other aspects The available evidence certainly suggests of citizenship education help young people that lowering the voting age would decrease understand ‘politics’ in the context of wider overall turnout in the short-term, and the society and their own communities. longer-term effects are disputed. In any event, There is some logic in the argument that we believe that the minimum age for electoral maintaining a gap between the end of participation should ultimately be determined compulsory citizenship education (at 16) on principles wider than the potential impact and the right to exercise electoral rights on election turnout. may be counter-productive. But the strength Lowering the voting and/or candidacy age of this argument depends on the quality of may help persuade younger people that the citizenship education. politicians were treating their views more Independent assessment suggests citizenship seriously. However, the fundamental issue for education is still very much in its infancy. young people seems to be that their views are Accordingly, it is not sensible to found any regarded as important and are considered recommendation about electoral rights on the properly by public policy-makers, not that the Age of electoral majority: executive summary 5 particular age at which they can vote or stand inform consideration of individual age-based should be lowered. rights. We propose further research on the social and political awareness of those around All or nothing? age 18 with a view to undertaking a further A number of alternatives to wholesale change review of the minimum age for electoral were suggested to us, including: participation in the future. •different ages for different elections (e.g. The Electoral Commission would therefore voting at 16 for local elections and 18 for expect to undertake a further formal review of national elections); the minimum voting age within five to seven •pilot schemes for the minimum ages; and years of this report. We would encourage the Government to consider in the meantime • allowing 16 and 17 year-olds to register to initiating a wider review of the age of majority, vote voluntarily. given the length of time that has passed since the last one. At the current time, the Commission does not believe that any of these options would be Different considerations apply in relation to appropriate, although in any future review we candidacy. It is election to office (not candidacy) would like to explore in more detail the idea of that gives an individual political power and different minimum ages for different elections. responsibility. The candidate selection process of political parties and the public Conclusions and recommendations election process itself already provide the There appears to be insufficient current public with the means to prevent individuals justification for a change to the voting age at they consider insufficiently mature from being the present time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lawmakers Are Mulling Multiple Bills That Would Let Cities and Towns Allow
    for purchasing tobacco products. Lyons added that lowering the voting age would be detrimental to “all the great work that has been achieved,” on age-related issues. “On the one hand, they don’t trust people under 21 to buy tobacco products, but, on the other, they want to give much younger people the right to vote,” Tuerck said. “We have to wonder where this thinking comes from.” People also have to be 21 to buy alcohol and marijuana in Massachusetts. The age limit for the juvenile justice system was raised from 17 to 18 in 2013, and lawmakers have looked at raising it to 21. While in high school, Vargas was involved in a five- year campaign with UTEC, the state have asked to be given formerly known as United Teen Lawmakers are mulling Equality Center, advocating multiple bills that would let cities the authority to lower the voting age for municipal elections. alongside other young adults in and towns allow teens as young Lowell to lower the voting age to as 16 to vote in local elections, “It is time to give municipalities the option to empower their own 17. The city passed a home rule a move critics are calling petition in 2015, but it ultimately “frivolous” and “absurd.” young people,” Chandler said. “Cities and towns stalled in the Legislature. Two bills that would “This is about local allow “every citizen 16 or 17 have asked for this option for years, and I believe that control,” Vargas said. “You years of age, who is a resident don’t have to agree with in the city or town where he or young people deserve a voice in their local
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Should Raise the Marriage Age Vivian E
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Popular Media Faculty and Deans 2013 Why We Should Raise the Marriage Age Vivian E. Hamilton William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Hamilton, Vivian E., "Why We Should Raise the Marriage Age" (2013). Popular Media. 123. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media/123 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/popular_media 5/14/13 Concurring Opinions » Why We Should Raise the Marriage Age » Print - Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com - Why We Should Raise the Marriage Age Posted By Vivian Hamilton On January 30, 2013 @ 6:31 pm In Family Law,Uncategorized | 6 Comments [1]My last series of posts [2] argued that states should lower the voting age, since by mid-adolescence, teens have the cognitive-processing and reasoning capacities required for voting competence. But that is not to say that teens have attained adult-like capacities across all domains. To the contrary, context matters. And one context in which teens lack competence is marriage. Through a single statutory adjustment — raising to 21 the age at which individuals may marry — legislators could reduce the percentage of marriages ending in divorce, improve women’s mental and physical health, and elevate women’s and children’s socioeconomic status. More than 1 in 10 U.S. women surveyed between 2001 and 2002 had married before age 18, with 9.4 million having married at age 16 or younger. In 2010, some 520,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress... and Tales of Woe Rudi Returns Peter Jack Maslen
    3 THE ARCHER - Advertising - 08700 292 406 JULY 2001 OBITUARY Peter Jack Maslen 18th July 1944 – 4th June 2001 It is with great sadness that THE ARCHER reports the death of Peter Maslen, aged 56. Pete was not only a faithful husband and father of four, but had a sense of community spirit that is rare in these times of individualism. His sense of duty led him to expend a great deal of time and energy into helping others, despite his poor and con- stantly failing health. Among his notable achieve- ments is his three-year involve- Colin Rogers, Mayor Ken Livingstone, Rudi Vis MP and Jacqui Suffling. ment in the Strawberry Vale Photo by Frances McGrane Tenants Association, where it could be argued that he was Rudi returns instrumental in the changes Peter Maslen - “a community spirit rare in these times”. Labour’s Rudi Vis retained his seat as MP for Finchley that have recently been brought Society at the same church, an typing, type-setting, account- and Golders Green in the general election with an about. organisation that provides care ing, printing and distribution, and help to anyone with any and a host of other things too increased majority despite a 12.32% fall in turnout. Up to 1997 he ran a play scheme in Strawberry Vale need, for any reason. numerous to mention. It is fair John Marshall (Conservative) came second and Sarah each summer, which focused to say that the upcoming 100th Teather of the Liberal Democrats was third. Selfless commitment on broadening the minds and From THE ARCHER’S point edition celebrations may not In the adjacent seat of Hornsey and Wood Green Barbara experiences of children who, of view, Pete will be most have ever come about, had it Roche (Labour) also retained her seat, but with a reduced due to financial or other cir- remembered for his selfless not been for Pete Maslen.
    [Show full text]
  • Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament
    Your Scotiand, Your Referendum Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament Background to SYP Our vision is of a stronger, more inclusive Scotland that empowers young people by truly involving them in the decision-making process. The Scottish Youth Parliament (SYP)is democratically elected to represent Scotland's youth. We listen to young people, recognise the issues that are most important to them, and ensure that their voices are heard. In working towards our aims, we support the following values: Democracy - All of our plans and activities are youth-led, and we are accountable to young people aged 14-25. Our democratic structure, and the scale of direct participation across Scotland, gives us strength and sets us apart from other organisations. Inclusion - We are committed to being truly inclusive. The Scottish Youth Parliament believes that all young people have a right to a voice, it doesn't matter who we are or where we come from. We celebrate our diversity. Political independence - We are independent from political parties. Only by working with all legitimate political parties can we make progress on the policies that are important to young people. Passion - We believe that drive and energy are key to successful campaigning. We are passionate about the key issues and believe that young people are part of the solution, not the problem. Introduction dnd Cont.ext of Response Scotland's constitutional future is an issue that the young people of Scotland feel strongly about, with a diverse range of views about the Scotland they wish to see. This is expressed in many different ways, which includes their views on whether or not Scotland should be independent and what powers the Scottish Parliament should or should not have, but also on a much wider span of issues currently within the legislative competence of Westminster, Holyrood, Scotland's local authorities and issues on a global scale that surpass the ability of either the UK or Scotland to act alone on.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Strategy, 1997-2001: Nation and National Identity
    Conservative Party Strategy, 1997-2001: Nation and National Identity A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy , Claire Elizabeth Harris Department of Politics, University of Sheffield September 2005 Acknowledgements There are so many people I'd like to thank for helping me through the roller-coaster experience of academic research and thesis submission. Firstly, without funding from the ESRC, this research would not have taken place. I'd like to say thank you to them for placing their faith in my research proposal. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Andrew Taylor. Without his good humour, sound advice and constant support and encouragement I would not have reached the point of completion. Having a supervisor who is always ready and willing to offer advice or just chat about the progression of the thesis is such a source of support. Thank you too, to Andrew Gamble, whose comments on the final draft proved invaluable. I'd also like to thank Pat Seyd, whose supervision in the first half of the research process ensured I continued to the second half, his advice, experience and support guided me through the challenges of research. I'd like to say thank you to all three of the above who made the change of supervisors as smooth as it could have been. I cannot easily put into words the huge effect Sarah Cooke had on my experience of academic research. From the beginnings of ESRC application to the final frantic submission process, Sarah was always there for me to pester for help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Leadership As a Route to Greater Empowerment
    WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY OCTOBER 30, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Mona Lena Krook, Darcy Ashman, Layla Moughari and Milad Pournik of Management Systems International. WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY Management Systems International Corporate Offices 200 12th Street South Arlington, VA 22202, USA Tel: + 1 703 979 7100 / Fax: +1 703 979 7101 Contracted under IQC No: AID-OAA-I-10-00002, Task Order No. AID-OAA-TO-13-00046 USAID Contracting Officer’s Representative: Julie Denham, DRG Center DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................................................. II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 KEY FINDINGS OF THE DESKTOP STUDY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRAMMING .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unfinished Business the Quest for a Living Wage
    Unfinished Business The Quest for a Living Wage FAIR PLAY – FAIR PAY “We have to accept that inequality is a way of achieving greater opportunity and prosperity” Lord Griffiths – Vice Chairman of Goldman Sachs “Let’s finally make the minimum wage a living wage. Let’s tie it to the cost of living so we don't have to wait another 10 years to see it rise.” President Barack Obama “Fair pay means motivated staff who stay working at Barclays longer. Improving people’s standard of living makes business sense.” Karen Pleva – Barclays Chief of Staff (Global Operations) Suite 11 Tulip House, 70 Borough High Street, London SE1 1XF FAIR PLAY – FAIR PAY www.fairpaynetwork.org Produced and written by Deborah Littman, Mark Donne and Barney Wakefield, with the kind support of Unfinished Business: The Quest for a Living Wage. page 3 Fair Pay Network Director Mark Donne Patrons Sian Berry Lord Best Jon Cruddas MP Baroness Helena Kennedy Guy Stallard, Director of International Services, KPMG Europe Polly Toynbee National Steering Committee Chair – Karen Buck MP Treasurer – Alison Garnham (Chief Executive, Child Poverty Action Group) Ben Whittaker (Vice-President Welfare, NUS) Moussa Haddad (Policy and Communications Manager, UK Poverty Programme, Oxfam) Kate Bell (Director of Policy, Gingerbread) Matthew Bolton (London Citizens) Stephen Burke (Chief Executive, Counsel and Care) Don Flynn (Director, Migrants Rights Network) Julie Gibson (UK Coalition against Poverty) Catherine Howarth (Director, Fair Pensions) Dr. Peter Kenway (Director, New Policy Institute) Clare Moody (Political Officer, Unite the Union) Deborah Littman (National Officer, UNISON) Jen McClelland (Appletree Trust) Dr. Catherine Rake (Director, Fawcett Society) Paul Sellers (Policy Officer, TUC) Lisa Johnson (UCU) Beth Lamont (Head of National & Equal Pay Unit, PCS) Steve Bell (Head of Policy, CWU) Alistair Gittins (National Policy Officer, RMT) page 4 Unfinished Business: The Quest for a Living Wage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drinking Age
    Vermont Legislative Research Shop Lowering the Drinking Age The minimum legal drinking age fluctuated throughout the second half of the 20th century, yielding mixed results. After prohibition was repealed in 1933, almost every state set the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) at 21 years.1 In 1970 Congress lowered the voting age to 18, which began a movement to lower the drinking age, as well. During the Vietnam era, many people were outraged that 18 year‐olds were fighting overseas yet could not have a drink. In the period between 1970 and 1975, 29 states lowered their MLDA to 18, 19 or 20. A study by Alexander Wagenaar revealed that in states that had lowered their minimum age there was a 15 to 20% increase in teen automobile accidents.2 This information influenced 16 states to raise their MLDA to 21 between 1976 and 1983. Pressure from groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) led to the signing of the Uniform Drinking Age Act by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984.3 This act mandated a significant decrease in federal transportation funding for states that did not raise their MLDA to 21. Worldwide, the United States has the highest MLDA, with others ranging from birth to age 20.4 The majority of countries have a MLDA of 18. In most of these countries, however, the family teaches responsible drinking from a very young age. Since 1960, over one hundred studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of raising the MLDA. This research was examined by Alexander Wagenaar to determine the trends that appeared in the conclusions.5 Some of these studies provided evidence supporting a MLDA of 21, while most others found no conclusive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Standing in Local and Regional Elections
    28th SESSION Strasbourg, 24-26 March 2015 CG/2015(28)7FINAL 26 March 2015 Criteria for standing in local and regional elections Governance Committee Co-rapporteurs:1 Oleksii HONCHARENKO, Ukraine (R, SOC) and Viacheslav ROGOV, Russian Federation (L, ILDG) Resolution 382 (2015) .............................................................................................................................2 Recommendation 375 (2015) ..................................................................................................................3 Explanatory memorandum .......................................................................................................................6 Summary The right to stand for election at local or regional level is a key component of local and regional democracy. While there needs to be some regulation to weed out spurious candidates, the health of territorial democracy depends on the greatest possible proportion of the electorate being able to stand for election. The rapporteurs believe that there remain too many restrictions on standing for local and regional elections. The increase in mobility in Europe is raising expectations and highlighting the drawbacks of maintaining practices and regulations that are overly restrictive in this respect. Governments are invited to review their legislation with a view to removing unnecessary restrictions on standing for election. The Congress therefore asks its committees to work with the Venice Commission in drawing up a supplement to the Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters to address the issue of criteria for standing in local and regional elections. 1 L: Chamber of Local Authorities / R: Chamber of Regions EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group in the Congress SOC: Socialist Group ILDG: Independent and Liberal Democrat Group ECR: European Conservatives and Reformists Group NR: Members not belonging to a political group of the Congress CG/2015(28)7FINAL RESOLUTION 382 (2015)2 1. The right to stand for election is a key component of local and regional democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto 2016-17 Our Vision for a Better World
    British Youth Council Manifesto 2016-17 Our vision for a better world British Youth Council Manifesto 2016-2017 Contents Our Community .........................................................................................4 Listen to local youth councils .......................................................................4 Save our services ........................................................................................4 Support us to inspect local services.............................................................4 End poverty in our communities ..................................................................5 Address the lack of affordable rural housing ................................................5 Provide safe and affordable public transport ...............................................5 The lack of transport in rural areas and its impact on young people ............6 Support us to volunteer ................................................................................6 Support and promote good relations with the nations ..................................7 Believe in equality ........................................................................................7 The vital nature of our public services .........................................................7 End Fuel Poverty .........................................................................................7 Olympics ......................................................................................................8 Social Action for All ......................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Greenview2007final:Layout 1
    News in Brief Chapelfield Gardens Tree Unthank Road *UHHQ3DUW\ This autumn sees the 20th If you look at the trunk of the tree Traffic Update Climate Change Action Plan anniversary of the 1987 gale. We you can still see the scar down the At the recent Green Party conference will be hearing many stories of how middle where it split. The tree has now A petition of 900 signatures was Green MEP Caroline Lucas outlined the the gale affected Norfolk, but how grown over the bolts that run through recently submitted to the Norwich party’s plan for comprehensive policies many people know of the effect on the trunk. However, if you stand at the Highways Agency Committee to tackle climate change. The policies WKH PDJQLÀFHQW ODUJH SODQH WUHH LQ bottom of the trunk and look up into the opposing plans to replace a push- include: WKHPLGGOHRI&KDSHOÀHOG*DUGHQV" branches you can still see some ropes button crossing on Unthank Road • Ruling out nuclear power and Anyone familiar with the gardens higher up helping to hold it together E\ *ORXFHVWHU 6WUHHW ZLWK D ]HEUD investing the money in renewable energy will know which tree this is – the large, where it split during the gale. crossing. The councillors on the DQGHQHUJ\HIÀFLHQF\PHDVXUHVLQVWHDG healthy one near the committee listened to the residents • /RFDOLVLQJ WKH HFRQRP\ to kiosk with huge branches and decided to keep the push-button massively reduce the distance goods are that almost reach the crossing. They also heard from several transported, so that wherever possible ground. Who would residents who were concerned about we use goods that are produced locally.
    [Show full text]
  • A HRC WG.6 34 IRQ 3 E.Pdf
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/34/IRQ/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 19 August 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-fourth session 4–15 November 2019 Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Iraq* Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights I. Background 1. The present report was prepared pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 5/1 and 16/21, taking into consideration the periodicity of the universal periodic review. It is a summary of 54 stakeholders’ submissions1 to the universal periodic review, presented in a summarized manner owing to word-limit constraints. II. Information provided by stakeholders A. Scope of international obligations2 and cooperation with international human rights mechanisms and bodies3 2. MAAT, Al Karama, AI, MENA Rights and other stakeholders have stated that since the previous UPR cycle, the authorities have not taken any steps accede to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.4 3. JAI and other stakeholders urged Iraq to join the International Criminal Court and to enforce the rule of law in Iraq.5 4. Al-Miezan recommended Iraq to ratify the International Labor Convention No. 130 of 1969 concerning medical care and patient support.6 5. Jiyan called on the Government to remove reservations entered to Articles 2 (f, g) and 16 of the CEDAW mandating states to repeal discriminatory laws and practices and ensure equality in all matters related to family and marital relations; and urged the Government to accept individual complaint procedure under ratified human rights treaties7 * The present document was not edited before being sent to United Nations translation services.
    [Show full text]