DOCSLIB.ORG

Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament Your Scotiand, Your Referendum Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament Background to SYP Our vision is of a stronger, more inclusive Scotland that empowers young people by truly involving them in the decision-making process. The Scottish Youth Parliament (SYP)is democratically elected to represent Scotland's youth. We listen to young people, recognise the issues that are most important to them, and ensure that their voices are heard. In working towards our aims, we support the following values: Democracy - All of our plans and activities are youth-led, and we are accountable to young people aged 14-25. Our democratic structure, and the scale of direct participation across Scotland, gives us strength and sets us apart from other organisations. Inclusion - We are committed to being truly inclusive. The Scottish Youth Parliament believes that all young people have a right to a voice, it doesn't matter who we are or where we come from. We celebrate our diversity. Political independence - We are independent from political parties. Only by working with all legitimate political parties can we make progress on the policies that are important to young people. Passion - We believe that drive and energy are key to successful campaigning. We are passionate about the key issues and believe that young people are part of the solution, not the problem. Introduction dnd Cont.ext of Response Scotland's constitutional future is an issue that the young people of Scotland feel strongly about, with a diverse range of views about the Scotland they wish to see. This is expressed in many different ways, which includes their views on whether or not Scotland should be independent and what powers the Scottish Parliament should or should not have, but also on a much wider span of issues currently within the legislative competence of Westminster, Holyrood, Scotland's local authorities and issues on a global scale that surpass the ability of either the UK or Scotland to act alone on. These diverse and distinctive views are expressed in 'Change the Picture', SYP's Youth Manifesto. Created following Scotland's largest youth consultation of its type with 42,804 responses from young people, the youth manifesto contains 49 statements commanding majority support from the young people consulted, is a compelling mandate for the priority issues for change that Scotland's young people Your Scotland, Your Referendum - Scottish Youth Parliament Response want to see. Change the Picture is the basis for SYP's policy and campaigning work and will be for the next four years. 1 Whilst we would recommend considering all 49 statements in the context of shaping a better future for Scotland's young people, regardless of current or future constitutional arrangements, two are of particular relevance to the issues covered by this consultation. They are: "A referendum should be held on Scotland's constitutional future, with the options of no change, more powers for the Scottish Parliament or full independence." 66%of respondents agreed; 14%disagreed; 20%were 'not sure'. "The minimum age for voting in all elections and referendums should be lowered to 16." 65%agreed; 25%disagreed; 10%were 'not sure'. To further inform our response, we conducted an online survey, 'How should Scotland's future be decided?' on issues contained within 'Your Scotland, Your Referendum' and also on the issues covered by the UK Government's prior consultation 'Scotland's constitutional future - a consultation on facilitating a legal, fair and decisive referendum on whether Scotland should leave the United Kingdom'. The survey ran from 21st February - 5th March 2012, and attracted a total of 152 responses, both from our Members (MSYPs)and other young people across Scotland. Figures and comments cited below are from the responses to that survey unless otherwise stated. This response is based on the views expressed by Scotland's young people through the Youth Manifesto and our online survey and should be viewed as a collective response on their behalf. To ensure consistency and in the spirit of our political independence, the SYPhas responded to 'Scotland's constitutional future ...' in the same manner and using the same sources. 2 The Scottish Youth Parliament does not intend to express a preference for any particular outcome of the referendum at this time. The collected views of young people expressed in this response are not intended to be implicit endorsements of any preferred outcome of the referendum nor should be interpreted as such. 1. Whet Off' VO:JI views on the referendum question and design of the ballot poper) The Scottish Youth Parliament recommends that the most important factors in determining the question or questions should be used in the referendum should be that they are clear and easy to understand, they do not favour any 1 Change the Picture - Scottish Youth Parliament Youth Manifesto - http://www.sYP.org. uk/ our- manifesto-W21 page-82- 2 Scotland's constitutional future - Response from the Scottish Youth Parliament - http://www. syp. org.uk/img/ consultations/Scotlands%20constitutional9'aOfuture SYP%20Response.p df Your Scotland, Your Referendum - Scottish Youth Parliament Response 2 particular outcome, and that they will not be subject to a successful legal challenge. The Scottish Youth Parliament recommends that 'Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?' should be used as the basis for the question on independence, subject to independent analysis of it against the criteria outlined above. In our survey, we asked respondents what should be the most important factors in deciding what the question(s) should be on a scale of one to five. The respondents felt that, in order, the most important factors should be that the question were "clear and easy to understand", with 91.9% of respondents choosing it as 'most important' or very important. The next most important factor was that the question was "totally unbiased so it doesn't favour any particular outcome" (83.4%) and that "there's no chance that the outcome could be challenged in court because of the question" (74.3%). Respondents did not consider that "the question is short" to be as important with just 39.7% describing it as the most or very important factors. Asking respondents to consider these factors we presented the respondents with a range of potential questions that have been suggested as possible options in a referendum on independence. The results of the survey question were as follows: Based on what you've told us above, which of these do you think should be the question asked in the referendum? Option Response % Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent 32.9% country? Do you want Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom or 18.4% do you want Scotland to leave the United Kingdom? Do you agree or disagree that Scotland should become 18.4% an independent country? The Scottish Government proposes that the powers and 9.2% responsibilities of the Scottish Parliament should be extended to enable independence to be achieved. Do you agree with this proposal? Do you agree that the Scottish Government should 8.6% negotiate a settlement with the Government of the United Kingdom so that Scotland becomes an independent state? Something else 12.5% None of the options presented achieved a majority of respondents, although the question proposed by the Scottish Government, 'Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?' was the most preferred option. Based on this we recommend that this is used as the basis for a question in the referendum, pending Your Scotland, Your Referendum - Scottish Youth Parliament Response 3 independent analysis to ensure it meets the factors suggested as most important in developing it as outlined above. We have no specific view on the design of the ballot paper as illustrated in the consultation document, though would suggest it be subject to similar independent analysis for clarity as outlined above. However, as the Scottish Youth Parliament believes that the referendum should include the options of the status quo, more powers for the Scottish Parliament or full independence; this would need to be reflected in any ballot design. More detail on this can be found in our response to 'What are your views on the inclusion of a second question in the referendum and the voting system that could be used?' which can be found below. 2. What ore your views on the proposed timetable and voting arrangements? The Scottish Youth Parliament recommends holding the referendum earlier than Autumn 2014 if it is possible to do so without compromising the integrity of the ballot. The Scottish Youth Parliament recommends the referendum is not held on a date when a Parliamentary election is also being held. We presented our survey respondents with a number of options for possible timings for a referendum. Included were the Scottish Government's preferred date of Autumn 2014, as well as two dates where elections are already being held (the European Parliament elections in June 2014, and the UK Parliament elections in May 2015) to explore whether respondents would favour a scenario similar to that in May 2011, where a referendum was twinned with another election.3 The UK Government has not set out a preferred date, but suggests that "the question of Scotland's constitutional status is resolved sooner rather than later" and that "a referendum can be successfully delivered within a year, from the introduction of legislation, through to the holding of the poll. " Working from the timescale outlined by the Scottish Government in 'Your Scotland, Your Referendum', which would see the introduction of a Referendum Bill in early 2013 we included two options which could meet this - late 2013 and early 2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manifesto 2016-17 Our Vision for a Better World
    British Youth Council Manifesto 2016-17 Our vision for a better world British Youth Council Manifesto 2016-2017 Contents Our Community .........................................................................................4 Listen to local youth councils .......................................................................4 Save our services ........................................................................................4 Support us to inspect local services.............................................................4 End poverty in our communities ..................................................................5 Address the lack of affordable rural housing ................................................5 Provide safe and affordable public transport ...............................................5 The lack of transport in rural areas and its impact on young people ............6 Support us to volunteer ................................................................................6 Support and promote good relations with the nations ..................................7 Believe in equality ........................................................................................7 The vital nature of our public services .........................................................7 End Fuel Poverty .........................................................................................7 Olympics ......................................................................................................8 Social Action for All ......................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Lowering the Voting Age to Sixteen
    # Y Gwasanaeth Ymchwil | Research Service Lowering the Voting Age to Sixteen Y Pwyllgor Deisebau | 23 Ionawr 2018 Petitions Committee | 23 January 2018 Research Briefing: Petition number: P-05-794 Petition title: Lowering the Voting Age to Sixteen Text of petition: We call on the National Assembly for Wales to lower the voting age to sixteen for those elections where they have the powers to do so. Background The Wales Act 2017 gives the National Assembly power to make provisions about Assembly and local government elections including the ability to lower the voting age. The relevant provisions are expected to come into force on 1 April 2018. The minimum voting age for all elections and referenda in Wales, England and Northern Ireland is 18. In Scotland, 16 and 17 year olds were permitted to vote in the Independence Referendum in September 2014. According to the Electoral Commission in their report on the Scottish Independence Referendum, 109,593 16 and 17 year olds registered to vote in the Scottish referendum. 75% of the 16-17 year olds the Electoral Commission spoke to claimed to have voted and 97% of those who reported having voted said that they would vote again in 1 future elections and referendums. The Scottish Parliament subsequently passed the Scottish Elections (Reduction of Voting Age) Act 2015 reducing the voting age to 16 for the Scottish Parliamentary and local elections. The Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey also have a minimum voting age of 16. Briefing Page | As outlined in the House of Commons Library Research Briefing Paper on Voting Age, there were attempts during the passage of the European Union Referendum Bill 2015-16 to amend the Bill to allow the franchise for the referendum to include 16 and 17 year olds.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the UK Lower the Voting Age to 16? a Democratic Audit Collection – Edited by Richard Berry and Sean Kippin
    Should the UK lower the voting age to 16? A Democratic Audit collection – edited by Richard Berry and Sean Kippin www.democraticaudit.com Should the UK lower the voting age to 16? Foreword Dr Andrew Mycock The proposition supporting the lowering of the voting age for all public elections across the United Kingdom has gained considerable political momentum over the past decade or so, largely due to the concerted campaigning of some leading youth organisations together with an increasing number of young people and politicians. With the majority of mainstream political parties now supporting the introduction of ‘votes at 16’, it is a proposal whose time appears to have come. That 16 and 17 year-olds will be able to vote on the constitutional future of Scotland in September 2014 suggests the ‘genie is out of the bottle’ and the move towards a universal lowering of the voting age to 16 across the UK is imminent. Such a view should however be tempered by a number of issues that might compromise the adoption of votes at 16. First, the Conservatives appear steadfastly opposed to its introduction and are unlikely to adopt the cause if they form the next government in 2015. Second, two noteworthy UK government-sponsored independent commissions on lowering the voting age over the past decade – The Russell Commission of 2004 and the Youth Citizenship Commission of 2008-9 - have both found against the proposition. Both commissions raised important questions about the increasingly fractured age limits for a range of rights and responsibilities and also questioned whether ‘votes at 16’ would induce greater youth political literacy and participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Power Report 2
    Electoral WELSH Reform Society POWER Cymru REPORT II THE POWER & VOICE OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN WALES 2 Welsh Power Report II: The Power & Voice of Young People in Wales For more information please contact The Electoral Reform Society Cymru operates the Electoral Reform Society Cymru on a simple premise – that politics can be better than it is. We are campaigning for a better • Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, democracy in Wales, and across the UK. Our Cardiff, CF10 5FH vision is a representative democracy fit for the • Telephone: (029) 2049 6613 21st century. We know that every year that • Email: [email protected] passes with our steam age political system still in place, is a year of missed opportunity for the people of Wales. We believe in a democracy Keep up to date with our work where: • Twitter: @ERS_Cymru • Every vote and every voice has • Facebook: www.facebook.com/ERSWales ABOUT ERS CYMRU MORE INFORMATION value and should be heard; • Web: www.electoral-reform.org.uk/wales • Everyone is able to shape the decisions that affect their lives; • Our institutions reflect the people they serve; • People are able to hold those in power to account; • Politics offers people real alternatives. Steve Brooks is the Director of the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. Dr Owain ap Gareth is the Campaigns & Research Officer for the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. AUTHORS Rhodri Griffiths is a teacher and education advisor to the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. Juliet Swann is the Campaigns & Research Officer for the Electoral Reform Society
    [Show full text]
  • Votes at 16 Will Not Solve the Problem of Youth Disengagement Overnight, but It Will Help Us to Address the Issue
    Votes at 16 will not solve the problem of youth disengagement overnight, but it will help us to address the issue democraticaudit.com /2014/05/14/votes-at-16-will-not-solve-the-problem-of-youth-disengagement-overnight- but-it-will-help-us-to-address-the-issue/ By Democratic Audit UK 2014-5-14 Last week MPs debated the the case for lowering the UK’s voting age to 16, following Scotland’s decision to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in the independence referendum. Sarah Champion MP initiated the debate, arguing in favour of the reform on the basis that young people demonstrate considerable enthusiasm for participating in politics. This post is an edited version of her speech, published as part of our series on youth participation. Sarah Champion MP made the case for votes at 16 in a Westminster Hall debate. Credit: Houses of Parliament There are 1.5 million 16 to 17-year-olds in the UK and they are missing out on the vote. There are so many things a person can do when they become 16. They can leave school to enter work, give full consent to medical treatment, consent to sexual relationships and even get married, if they choose to, with parental permission. Sixteen-year-olds may also join the armed forces, change their name by deed poll, obtain tax credits and welfare benefits in their own right, become a member of a trade union or co-operative society, and even become the director of a company. On top of all that, 16-year-olds in work are required to pay income tax and national insurance contributions, yet those 16-year-olds paying taxes are not allowed a say in how they are spent.
    [Show full text]
  • VA16 FINAL.Pages
    THE NEW FRONTIER VOTES AT 16 Richard Reeves and Thishani Nadesan April 2010 The new frontier Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: · Demos and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org PARTNERS CREDITS With support from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust and in collaboration with Ipsos Mori Published by Demos 3 April 2010 © Demos. Some rights reserved. Third Floor Magdalen House 136 Tooley Street London SE1 2TU T 0845 458 5949 F 020 7367 4201 [email protected] www.demos.co.uk 2 The new frontier CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The UK debate 3. Arguments for reform 4. Arguments against reform 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving 16 and 17 Year Olds the Vote the Tory Case
    Giving 16 and 17 Year Olds the Vote The Tory Case Ruth Davidson Sarah Wollaston David Fazakerley Foreword by Damian Green Contents Foreword Rt Hon Damian Green MP Foreword The traditional Conservative response to the idea of giving 16-year- Rt Hon Damian Green MP ............................................................... 2 olds the vote has been to reject it on the ground that they are not mature enough, they don’t pay taxes and therefore they don’t feel Lessons from the Scottish Referendum the consequences of any vote they may cast. This pamphlet argues Ruth Davidson MSP ......................................................................... 4 strongly, from a number of different perspectives, that the traditional response needs further thought. The Conservative Party Must be a Party of the Future Dr Sarah Wollaston MP .................................................................... 6 Tories, particularly reforming Tories, should always be careful that the instinct to say “If it is not necessary to change it is necessary not to The Education Imperative to Lowering the Voting Age change” does not become a reactionary block on all change. When the David Fazakerley, TRG Chair ........................................................... 8 Conservative Party gets in to this mode it appears to reject the world around it. It seldom prospers in this guise. So I hope these essays provoke some new thought within the Conser- vative family. As Ruth Davidson, the Leader of the Scottish Conserva- tives, argues with her knowledge of the Scottish referendum campaign the democratic effect of giving the vote to 16 and 17 year-olds was “entirely positive”. Like many of us she previously accepted the con- ventional wisdom on this issue but has now changed her mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (684Kb)
    YOUTH &POLICY No. 116 MAY 2017 Youth & Policy: The final issue? Towards a new format Editorial Group Paula Connaughton, Ruth Gilchrist, Tracey Hodgson, Tony Jeffs, Mark Smith, Jean Spence, Naomi Thompson, Tania de St Croix, Aniela Wenham, Tom Wylie. Associate Editors Priscilla Alderson, Institute of Education, London Sally Baker, The Open University Simon Bradford, Brunel University Judith Bessant, RMIT University, Australia Lesley Buckland, YMCA George Williams College Bob Coles, University of York John Holmes, Newman College, Birmingham Sue Mansfield, University of Dundee Gill Millar, South West Regional Youth Work Adviser Susan Morgan, University of Ulster Jon Ord, University College of St Mark and St John Jenny Pearce, University of Bedfordshire John Pitts, University of Bedfordshire Keith Popple, London South Bank University John Rose, Consultant Kalbir Shukra, Goldsmiths University Tony Taylor, IDYW Joyce Walker, University of Minnesota, USA Anna Whalen, Freelance Consultant Published by Youth & Policy, ‘Burnbrae’, Black Lane, Blaydon Burn, Blaydon on Tyne NE21 6DX. www.youthandpolicy.org Copyright: Youth & Policy The views expressed in the journal remain those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Editorial Group. Whilst every effort is made to check factual information, the Editorial Group is not responsible for errors in the material published in the journal. ii Youth & Policy No. 116 May 2017 About Youth & Policy Youth & Policy Journal was founded in 1982 to offer a critical space for the discussion of youth policy and youth work theory and practice. The editorial group have subsequently expanded activities to include the organisation of related conferences, research and book publication. Regular activities include the bi- annual ‘History of Community and Youth Work’ and the ‘Thinking Seriously’ conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youth Citizenship Commission and Political Engagement: Agendas; Proposals, Impact; Legacy
    The Youth Citizenship Commission and Political Engagement: Agendas; Proposals, Impact; Legacy Jon Tonge, University of Liverpool [email protected] ‘Young People and Politics: Is there a problem?’ panel Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, 25-27 March 2013 The Youth Citizenship Commission The Governance of Britain Green Paper published July 2007: highlighted need for Government to engage young people and encourage them to play an active part in society recommended establishment of Youth Citizenship Commission Youth Citizenship Commission (YCC) established February 2008 In addition to Chair, 12 Commissioners appointed YCC reported to the Prime Minister, Secretary of State for Justice, and Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families in spring 2009 YCC Terms of Reference Youth Citizenship Commission examined: what citizenship means to young people how to increase young people’s participation in politics; the development of citizenship amongst disadvantaged groups; how active citizenship can be promoted through volunteering and community engagement; and how the political system can reflect the communication preferences of young people and led a consultation with young people on whether the voting age should be lowered to 16 A crowded field? Power Inquiry Electoral Commission Ajegbo Report Russell Commission Yvote/Ynot project Goldsmith Commission Mind the Gap: Voting rates in general elections 1997-2005 Voting rates for 1997, 2001 and 2005 Parliamentary Elections 80 70 60 50 18-24 40 Overall average
    [Show full text]
  • Download (836Kb)
    Bowman, Benjamin (2014) Votes at 16 should be part of the systemic reform needed to counter youth abstention from democratic institutions. In: Should the UK lower the voting age to 16? Democratic Audit. Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/626723/ Version: Published Version Publisher: Democratic Audit Usage rights: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Deriva- tive Works 4.0 Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk Should the UK lower the voting age to 16? A Democratic Audit collection – edited by Richard Berry and Sean Kippin www.democraticaudit.com Should the UK lower the voting age to 16? Foreword Dr Andrew Mycock The proposition supporting the lowering of the voting age for all public elections across the United Kingdom has gained considerable political momentum over the past decade or so, largely due to the concerted campaigning of some leading youth organisations together with an increasing number of young people and politicians. With the majority of mainstream political parties now supporting the introduction of ‘votes at 16’, it is a proposal whose time appears to have come. That 16 and 17 year-olds will be able to vote on the constitutional future of Scotland in September 2014 suggests the ‘genie is out of the bottle’ and the move towards a universal lowering of the voting age to 16 across the UK is imminent. Such a view should however be tempered by a number of issues that might compromise the adoption of votes at 16. First, the Conservatives appear steadfastly opposed to its introduction and are unlikely to adopt the cause if they form the next government in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee EUROPEAN UNION (REFERENDUM) BILL Fourth Sitting Wednesday 4 September 2013 (Afternoon) CONTENTS CLAUSE 2 agreed to. Adjourned till Tuesday 10 September at Two o’clock. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 011) 2013 - 2014 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Sunday 8 September 2013 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 185 Public Bill Committee4 SEPTEMBER 2013 European Union (Referendum) Bill 186 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: MR JOE BENTON,†MR GARY STREETER † Bain, Mr William (Glasgow North East) (Lab) † Reynolds, Emma (Wolverhampton North East) † Burley, Mr Aidan (Cannock Chase) (Con) (Lab) Campbell, Mr Gregory (East Londonderry) (DUP) † Sheerman, Mr Barry (Huddersfield)
    [Show full text]
  • The Loch Ness Monster, Haggis, and a Lower Voting Age: What America Can Learn from Scotland
    THE LOCH NESS MONSTER, HAGGIS, AND A LOWER VOTING AGE: WHAT AMERICA CAN LEARN FROM SCOTLAND JOSHUA A. DOUGLAS* This Article, prepared for an American University Law Review symposium, explores what the United States can learn from Scotland’s experience in lowering the voting age to sixteen. The minimum voting age in American elections seems firmly entrenched at eighteen, based in part on the Twenty-Sixth Amendment, which prohibits states from denying the right to vote to anyone aged eighteen or older. Yet the conversation about lowering the voting age to sixteen, at least for local elections, has gained steam in recent years. The debate in America, however, is nascent compared to the progress in Scotland, which lowered the voting age to sixteen for its Independence Referendum in 2014 and for all Scottish elections in 2015. Using original research from interviews I conducted in Scotland, this Article offers three main takeaways for American jurisdictions considering this reform: the Scottish experience in lowering the voting age has been mostly successful because advocates (1) went into schools to register students to vote and encourage them to participate; (2) offered meaningful civics education, though that instruction was somewhat uneven across the country; and (3) created a bipartisan coalition of policymakers who supported the change. As the debate on the voting age in the United States expands, advocates should draw upon these lessons from Scotland. * Thomas P. Lewis Professor of Law, University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law. Thanks to Chris Bradley, Jan Eichhorn, Tony Gaughan, Andy McLaughlin, Andy Mycock, Carly Muetterties, and Lori Ringhand for comments on drafts of this Article.
    [Show full text]