The Youth Citizenship Commission and Political Engagement: Agendas; Proposals, Impact; Legacy

Jon Tonge, University of Liverpool [email protected]

‘Young People and Politics: Is there a problem?’ panel Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, 25-27 March 2013 The Youth Citizenship Commission

 The Governance of Britain Green Paper published July 2007:

 highlighted need for Government to engage young people and encourage them to play an active part in society

 recommended establishment of Youth Citizenship Commission

 Youth Citizenship Commission (YCC) established February 2008

 In addition to Chair, 12 Commissioners appointed

 YCC reported to the Prime Minister, Secretary of State for Justice, and Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families in spring 2009

YCC Terms of Reference

 Youth Citizenship Commission examined:

 what citizenship means to young people

 how to increase young people’s participation in politics; the development of citizenship amongst disadvantaged groups; how active citizenship can be promoted through volunteering and community engagement; and how the political system can reflect the communication preferences of young people

 and led a consultation with young people on whether the should be lowered to 16

A crowded field?

 Electoral Commission

 Ajegbo Report

 Russell Commission

 Yvote/Ynot project

 Goldsmith Commission Mind the Gap: Voting rates in general elections 1997-2005

Voting rates for 1997, 2001 and 2005 Parliamentary Elections

80 70 60 50 18-24 40 Overall average 30 20 Voting(%) rate 10 0 1997 2001 2005 Election Election Election Year The Participation ‘Problem’

Participation facts:  voter turnout for 18-24 year olds is 20% lower than overall turnout

 only 23% of 18-24 year olds would be “absolutely certain” to vote, compared with 53% of people overall

 only 3% of 18-24 year olds have presented their views to a local councillor or MP in the last 5 years (compared with an overall average of 15%)

 reflects a general decline in the percentage of the population who feel they are able to influence decision makers.

 evidence shows that non-voting is habit-forming: those who don’t vote when they are young are less likely to vote when they are older Growing pressure for votes at 16?

 Labour

 Liberal Democrats

Various pressure groups making up the Votes at 16 Coalition including , Children’s Rights Alliance, Who wants votes at 16? YCC survey evidence Voting 11-13 14-15 16-18 19-21 22-25 TOTAL should be allowed at 16 Agree 48 49 53 41 43 46 Disagree 38 38 40 48 53 43

N 1,114 The ‘evidence’ for lowering the voting age

 Grounded in dubious human hights assertions

 Based on erroneous assertions re ages of responsibility

 No consideration of risks re turnout or issues of political knowledge Explanations of diminishing turnout amongst the young

 Structural

 Contingent

 Supply

 Demand

 Knowledge Key recommendations on voting

 Electoral registration in schools

 Westminster to consider whether the age of franchise for devolved and local elections in , Wales and N. Ireland should be a matter for the devolved legislatures

 Age thresholds for different legal responsibilities should be subject to holistic review

Spheres of interaction

Individual I Family & Friends I Community I Formal Political World

Key themes of the final main report

• Empowering citizenship

• Connecting with young people

• Changing the way decision-makers and institutions work

Key recommendations of the YCC main report

 Improved delivery of citizenship education – growing body of evidence indicates its value

 Public bodies to establish youth advisory and scrutiny panels

 Parliament to fund UKYP

 Civic service

 Equality impact assessments to be extended to young people

BinaryDemography Logit Logistic Regression forAttitudes Likelihood of voting Citizenship education

B SE B SE B SE

Constant 1.84 0.53 2.66 0.63 2.39 0.64

Male -0.24 0.19 -0.23 0.20 -0.22 0.20

Age (22-25)

14-15 -1.91** 0.33 -2.02*** 0.41 -2.15*** 0.42

16-18 -0.94** 0.24 -1.00*** 0.30 -1.13** 0.30

19-21 -0.31 0.27 -0.30 0.28 -0.33 0.28

Social class (D/E)

A/B 0.64* 0.32 0.63** 0.33 0.59* 0.33

C1 0.75** 0.28 0.67* 0.29 0.65* 0.29

C2 0.21 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.23 0.29

Ethnicity (white) -0.88* 0.47 -0.94* 0.47 -0.89 0.47

Working (yes) -0.08 0.26 0.01 0.26

Prospect of -0.48* 0.20 -0.46* 0.20 decent job (no)

Volunteered (no) -0.20 0.26 -0.46* 0.26

Citizenship 0.48* 0.23 education (yes)

Conclusions

 Votes at 16 issue tended to dominate the Commission – clear case in favour not truly made

 Youth voter non-registration even bigger issue than V16?

 Structures of youth participation in politics tend to be weak (UKYP-excepted) and need bolstering

 Retention of citizenship education welcome – clear case that has had beneficial effect

 Audit of responses to various Commission reports is needed