DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Lebesgue Integration Free Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Lebesgue Integration Free Ebook LEBESGUE INTEGRATION DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK J. H. Williamson | 128 pages | 15 Oct 2014 | Dover Publications Inc. | 9780486789774 | English | New York, United States Riemann integral These properties can be shown to hold in many different cases. A general not necessarily positive measurable function Lebesgue Integration is Lebesgue integrable if the area between the graph of f and the x -axis is finite:. I have to pay a certain sum, which I have collected in my pocket. Since this is Lebesgue Integration for Lebesgue Integration partition, f is not Riemann integrable. September The problem with this definition becomes Lebesgue Integration when we try to split the integral into two pieces. It Lebesgue Integration that Cantor did not keep up with the work of the later generation of French analysts. Differentiation notation Second derivative Implicit differentiation Logarithmic differentiation Related rates Taylor's theorem. The integral of a simple function is equal Lebesgue Integration the measure of a given layer, times the height of that layer. As we stated earlier, these two definitions are equivalent. In applications such as Fourier series it is important to be able to approximate the integral of Lebesgue Integration function using integrals of approximations to the function. Measure Theory and Integration. Because the Riemann integral of a function is a number, this makes the Riemann integral a linear functional on the vector space of Riemann-integrable functions. Namespaces Article Talk. Since Lebesgue Integration started from an arbitrary partition and ended up as close as we wanted to either zero or one, it is false to say that we are eventually trapped near some number sso this function is not Riemann integrable. For proper Riemann integrals, a standard theorem states that if f n is a sequence of functions that converge uniformly to f on a compact set [ ab ]then. Hence its Riemann Lebesgue Integration is zero. Fundamental theorem Leibniz integral rule Limits of functions Continuity Mean value theorem Rolle's theorem. New York: Dover, pp. This is because the Darboux integral is technically simpler and because a function is Riemann-integrable if and only if it is Darboux-integrable. Unfortunately, this definition is very difficult to use. Download as PDF Printable version. Then let. One such approach is provided by the Daniell integral. Birnbaum, Z. This is the approach taken by Bourbaki Lebesgue Integration a certain number of other authors. Fractional Malliavin Stochastic Variations. Great Currents of Mathematical Thought. Glossary of calculus. Our new definition says that the Riemann integral of f equals s if the following condition holds:. Lebesgue Integral The Lebesgue integral is deficient in one respect. By taking better and better approximations, we can say that Lebesgue Integration the limit" we get exactly the area of S under the curve. For all n we have:. In this tract he once again treats the subject in its Lebesgue Integration context. Each term in the sum is the product of the Lebesgue Integration of the function at a given point and the length of an interval. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. With the advent of Fourier seriesmany analytical problems involving integrals came up whose satisfactory solution required interchanging limit processes and integral signs. Mitchell Spector 1 1 silver badge Lebesgue Integration 6 bronze badges. The Lebesgue integral plays an important role in probability Lebesgue Integrationreal analysisand many other fields in mathematics. He had met a number of French mathematicians, including Lebesgue Integration, Picard, and Appell, and was delighted to report to Gosta Mittag-Leffler that he had liked Poincare very much and was happy to see that the Frenchman understood transfinite set theory Lebesgue Integration its applications in functional analysis. Home Questions Lebesgue Integration Users Unanswered. Let f be a non-negative real -valued function on the interval [ ab ]and let. Categories : Definitions of mathematical integration Measure theory. One key reason for this might be that after his first breakdownCantor's range of interests were widely expanded to many other domains, as indicated by the following excerpt from Dauben's aforementioned paper: He began to emphasize other interests. It seems interesting to know about any possible reaction of Cantor to the measure and integration theory of Lebesgue. Complex -valued functions can be similarly integrated, by considering the real part and the imaginary part separately. Infobase Publishing. In that case, as in the Riemannian case, the integral is the difference between the area above the x -axis and the area below the x -axis:. Was Cantor aware of Lebesgue theory of integration? In the second chapter he defines the integral both geometrically and analytically. Simple functions can be used to approximate a measurable function, by partitioning the range into layers. However, as the need to consider more irregular functions arose—e. If f n is a uniformly convergent sequence on [ ab ] with limit fLebesgue Integration Riemann integrability of all f n implies Riemann integrability of fand. The Lebesgue integral is defined in terms of upper and lower bounds using the Lebesgue measure of a set. Basic type of integral in elementary calculus. If f is continuous, then the lower and upper Darboux sums for an untagged partition are equal to the Riemann sum for that partition, where the tags are chosen to be the minimum or maximum respectively of f on each subinterval. This process of rearrangement can convert a very pathological function into one that is "nice" from the point of view of integration, and thus let such pathological functions be Lebesgue Integration. These more general theories allow for the integration of more "jagged" or "highly oscillating" functions whose Riemann integral does not exist; Lebesgue Integration the theories give the same value as the Riemann integral when it does exist. Unlimited random practice problems and answers with built-in Step-by-step solutions. Suppose that two partitions P xt and Q ys are both partitions of the interval [ ab ]. In the 17th century, Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz discovered the idea that integration was intrinsically linked to differentiationthe latter being a way of measuring how quickly a function changed at any given point on the graph. If t i is directly on top of one of the Lebesgue Integration jthen we let t i be the tag for both intervals:. Limits of functions Continuity. There is also the question of whether this corresponds in any way to a Riemann notion of integration. A tagged partition P xt of an interval [ ab ] is a partition together with a finite sequence of numbers t 0The integrability condition can be proven in various Lebesgue Integration, [5] [6] [7] [8] one of which is sketched below. In other words, it is a partition together with a distinguished point of every sub-interval. Ali Enayat Ali Enayat The insight is that one should be able to rearrange the values of a function Lebesgue Integration, while preserving Lebesgue Integration value of the integral. Kestelman, H. This function is nowhere continuous. One important requirement is Lebesgue Integration the mesh of the partitions must become smaller and smaller, so that in the limit, it is zero. Mean Lebesgue Integration theorem Rolle's theorem. The t i have already been chosen, and we can't change the value of f at those points. The Riemann integral uses the notion of length explicitly. Lebesgue Integration first Lebesgue Integration these, unrelated to his development of Lebesgue integration, dealt with the extension of Baire's theorem to functions of two variables. We develop this definition now, with a proof of equivalence following. Glossary of calculus List of calculus topics. This is because the Darboux integral is technically simpler and because a function is Riemann-integrable if and only if it is Darboux-integrable. Henri Lebesgue BeauvaisOiseFrance. One key reason for this might be Lebesgue Integration after his first breakdownCantor's range of interests were widely expanded to many other domains, as indicated by the following Lebesgue Integration from Dauben's aforementioned paper: He began to emphasize other interests. The Riemann integral Lebesgue Integration by Bernhard Riemann — —is a broadly successful attempt to provide such a Lebesgue Integration. Now we will show that Lebesgue Integration Darboux integrable function satisfies the first definition. Lebesgue Integration as PDF Printable version. Related This elementary area is just. The first way is to always choose a rational pointso that the Riemann sum is as large as possible. Glossary of calculus List of calculus topics. Each term in the sum is the product of the value of the function at a Lebesgue Integration point Lebesgue Integration the length of an interval. Our first step is to cut up the Lebesgue Integration. Failure of monotone convergence. The problem of integration regarded as the search for a primitive function is the keynote of the book. In mathematicsthe integral of a non-negative function of a single variable can be regarded, in the simplest case, as the area between the graph of that function and the x -axis. It is possible to prove that the answer to both questions is yes. When f is discontinuous on a subinterval, there may not be a tag that achieves the infimum or supremum Lebesgue Integration that subinterval. Riemann could only use planar rectangles to approximate the area under the curve, because there was no adequate theory for measuring more general sets. The amount of time he devoted to various literary and historical problems steadily increased, and he read the history and documents of the Elizabethans with great attentiveness in hopes of proving that Francis Bacon was the true author of Shakespeare's plays. In educational settings, the Darboux integral offers a simpler definition that is easier to work with; it can Lebesgue Integration used to introduce the Riemann integral.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integral
    Divulgaciones Matem´aticasVol. 8 No. 1 (2000), pp. 75{85 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integral El Teorema Fundamental del C´alculo para la Integral de Lebesgue Di´omedesB´arcenas([email protected]) Departamento de Matem´aticas.Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de los Andes. M´erida.Venezuela. Abstract In this paper we prove the Theorem announced in the title with- out using Vitali's Covering Lemma and have as a consequence of this approach the equivalence of this theorem with that which states that absolutely continuous functions with zero derivative almost everywhere are constant. We also prove that the decomposition of a bounded vari- ation function is unique up to a constant. Key words and phrases: Radon-Nikodym Theorem, Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Vitali's covering Lemma. Resumen En este art´ıculose demuestra el Teorema Fundamental del C´alculo para la integral de Lebesgue sin usar el Lema del cubrimiento de Vi- tali, obteni´endosecomo consecuencia que dicho teorema es equivalente al que afirma que toda funci´onabsolutamente continua con derivada igual a cero en casi todo punto es constante. Tambi´ense prueba que la descomposici´onde una funci´onde variaci´onacotada es ´unicaa menos de una constante. Palabras y frases clave: Teorema de Radon-Nikodym, Teorema Fun- damental del C´alculo,Lema del cubrimiento de Vitali. Received: 1999/08/18. Revised: 2000/02/24. Accepted: 2000/03/01. MSC (1991): 26A24, 28A15. Supported by C.D.C.H.T-U.L.A under project C-840-97. 76 Di´omedesB´arcenas 1 Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integral states that: A function f :[a; b] R is absolutely continuous if and only if it is ! 1 differentiable almost everywhere, its derivative f 0 L [a; b] and, for each t [a; b], 2 2 t f(t) = f(a) + f 0(s)ds: Za This theorem is extremely important in Lebesgue integration Theory and several ways of proving it are found in classical Real Analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz's Rule and Fubini's Theorem Associated with Hahn Difference
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE I S S N 2provided 3 4 7 -by1921 KHALSA PUBLICATIONS Volume 12 Number 06 J o u r n a l of Advances in Mathematics Leibniz’s rule and Fubini’s theorem associated with Hahn difference operators å Alaa E. Hamza † , S. D. Makharesh † † Jeddah University, Department of Mathematics, Saudi, Arabia † Cairo University, Department of Mathematics, Giza, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] å † Cairo University, Department of Mathematics, Giza, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT In 1945 , Wolfgang Hahn introduced his difference operator Dq, , which is defined by f (qt ) f (t) D f (t) = , t , q, (qt ) t 0 where = with 0 < q <1, > 0. In this paper, we establish Leibniz’s rule and Fubini’s theorem associated with 0 1 q this Hahn difference operator. Keywords. q, -difference operator; q, –Integral; q, –Leibniz Rule; q, –Fubini’s Theorem. 1Introduction The Hahn difference operator is defined by f (qt ) f (t) D f (t) = , t , (1) q, (qt ) t 0 where q(0,1) and > 0 are fixed, see [2]. This operator unifies and generalizes two well known difference operators. The first is the Jackson q -difference operator which is defined by f (qt) f (t) D f (t) = , t 0, (2) q qt t see [3, 4, 5, 6]. The second difference operator which Hahn’s operator generalizes is the forward difference operator f (t ) f (t) f (t) = , t R, (3) (t ) t where is a fixed positive number, see [9, 10, 13, 14].
    [Show full text]
  • Shape Analysis, Lebesgue Integration and Absolute Continuity Connections
    NISTIR 8217 Shape Analysis, Lebesgue Integration and Absolute Continuity Connections Javier Bernal This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8217 NISTIR 8217 Shape Analysis, Lebesgue Integration and Absolute Continuity Connections Javier Bernal Applied and Computational Mathematics Division Information Technology Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8217 July 2018 INCLUDES UPDATES AS OF 07-18-2018; SEE APPENDIX U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Undersecretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ This Shape Analysis, Lebesgue Integration and publication Absolute Continuity Connections Javier Bernal is National Institute of Standards and Technology, available Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA free of Abstract charge As shape analysis of the form presented in Srivastava and Klassen’s textbook “Functional and Shape Data Analysis” is intricately related to Lebesgue integration and absolute continuity, it is advantageous from: to have a good grasp of the latter two notions. Accordingly, in these notes we review basic concepts and results about Lebesgue integration https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8217 and absolute continuity. In particular, we review fundamental results connecting them to each other and to the kind of shape analysis, or more generally, functional data analysis presented in the aforeme- tioned textbook, in the process shedding light on important aspects of all three notions. Many well-known results, especially most results about Lebesgue integration and some results about absolute conti- nuity, are presented without proofs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Measure Theory Terence
    An introduction to measure theory Terence Tao Department of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095 E-mail address: [email protected] To Garth Gaudry, who set me on the road; To my family, for their constant support; And to the readers of my blog, for their feedback and contributions. Contents Preface ix Notation x Acknowledgments xvi Chapter 1. Measure theory 1 x1.1. Prologue: The problem of measure 2 x1.2. Lebesgue measure 17 x1.3. The Lebesgue integral 46 x1.4. Abstract measure spaces 79 x1.5. Modes of convergence 114 x1.6. Differentiation theorems 131 x1.7. Outer measures, pre-measures, and product measures 179 Chapter 2. Related articles 209 x2.1. Problem solving strategies 210 x2.2. The Radamacher differentiation theorem 226 x2.3. Probability spaces 232 x2.4. Infinite product spaces and the Kolmogorov extension theorem 235 Bibliography 243 vii viii Contents Index 245 Preface In the fall of 2010, I taught an introductory one-quarter course on graduate real analysis, focusing in particular on the basics of mea- sure and integration theory, both in Euclidean spaces and in abstract measure spaces. This text is based on my lecture notes of that course, which are also available online on my blog terrytao.wordpress.com, together with some supplementary material, such as a section on prob- lem solving strategies in real analysis (Section 2.1) which evolved from discussions with my students. This text is intended to form a prequel to my graduate text [Ta2010] (henceforth referred to as An epsilon of room, Vol. I ), which is an introduction to the analysis of Hilbert and Banach spaces (such as Lp and Sobolev spaces), point-set topology, and related top- ics such as Fourier analysis and the theory of distributions; together, they serve as a text for a complete first-year graduate course in real analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing the Bayes Factor from a Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Computing the Bayes Factor from a Markov chain Monte Carlo Simulation of the Posterior Distribution Martin D. Weinberg∗ Department of Astronomy University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA Abstract Computation of the marginal likelihood from a simulated posterior distribution is central to Bayesian model selection but is computationally difficult. The often-used harmonic mean approximation uses the posterior directly but is unstably sensitive to samples with anomalously small values of the likelihood. The Laplace approximation is stable but makes strong, and of- ten inappropriate, assumptions about the shape of the posterior distribution. It is useful, but not general. We need algorithms that apply to general distributions, like the harmonic mean approximation, but do not suffer from convergence and instability issues. Here, I argue that the marginal likelihood can be reliably computed from a posterior sample by careful attention to the numerics of the probability integral. Posing the expression for the marginal likelihood as a Lebesgue integral, we may convert the harmonic mean approximation from a sample statistic to a quadrature rule. As a quadrature, the harmonic mean approximation suffers from enor- mous truncation error as consequence . This error is a direct consequence of poor coverage of the sample space; the posterior sample required for accurate computation of the marginal likelihood is much larger than that required to characterize the posterior distribution when us- ing the harmonic mean approximation. In addition, I demonstrate that the integral expression for the harmonic-mean approximation converges slowly at best for high-dimensional problems with uninformative prior distributions. These observations lead to two computationally-modest families of quadrature algorithms that use the full generality sample posterior but without the instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Elementary Calculus
    Elementary Calculus 2 v0 2g 2 0 v0 g Michael Corral Elementary Calculus Michael Corral Schoolcraft College About the author: Michael Corral is an Adjunct Faculty member of the Department of Mathematics at School- craft College. He received a B.A. in Mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley, and received an M.A. in Mathematics and an M.S. in Industrial & Operations Engineering from the University of Michigan. This text was typeset in LATEXwith the KOMA-Script bundle, using the GNU Emacs text editor on a Fedora Linux system. The graphics were created using TikZ and Gnuplot. Copyright © 2020 Michael Corral. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Preface This book covers calculus of a single variable. It is suitable for a year-long (or two-semester) course, normally known as Calculus I and II in the United States. The prerequisites are high school or college algebra, geometry and trigonometry. The book is designed for students in engineering, physics, mathematics, chemistry and other sciences. One reason for writing this text was because I had already written its sequel, Vector Cal- culus. More importantly, I was dissatisfied with the current crop of calculus textbooks, which I feel are bloated and keep moving further away from the subject’s roots in physics. In addi- tion, many of the intuitive approaches and techniques from the early days of calculus—which I think often yield more insights for students—seem to have been lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Set 6
    Richard Bamler Jeremy Leach office 382-N, phone: 650-723-2975 office 381-J [email protected] [email protected] office hours: office hours: Mon 1:00pm-3pm, Thu 1:00pm-2:00pm Thu 3:45pm-6:45pm MATH 172: Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Analysis (winter 2012) Problem set 6 due Wed, 2/22 in class (1) (20 points) Let X be an arbitrary space, M a σ-algebra on X and λ a measure on M. Consider an M-measurable function ρ : X ! [0; 1] which only takes non-negative values. (a) Show that the function, Z µ : M! [0; 1];A 7! (ρχA)dλ is a measure on M. We will also denote this measure by µ = (ρλ). (b) Show that any M-measurable function f : X ! R is integrable with respect to µ if and only if fρ is integrable with respect to λ. In this case we have Z Z Z fdµ = fd(ρλ) = fρdλ. (Hint: Show first that this is true for simple functions, then for non-negative functions, then for general functions). (c) Show that if A 2 M is a nullset with respect to λ, then it is also a nullset with respect to µ = ρλ. (Remark: A measure µ with this property is called absolutely continuous with respect to λ in symbols µ λ.) (d) Assume that X = Rn, M = L and λ is the Lebesgue measure. Give an example for a measure µ0 on M such that there is no non-negative, M- measurable function ρ : X ! [0; 1] with µ0 = ρλ.
    [Show full text]
  • Lp-Solution to the Random Linear Delay Differential Equation with a Stochastic Forcing Term
    mathematics Article Lp-solution to the Random Linear Delay Differential Equation with a Stochastic Forcing Term Juan Carlos Cortés * and Marc Jornet Instituto Universitario de Matemática Multidisciplinar, Building 8G, access C, 2nd floor, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 May 2020; Accepted: 18 June 2020; Published: 20 June 2020 Abstract: This paper aims at extending a previous contribution dealing with the random autonomous-homogeneous linear differential equation with discrete delay t > 0, by adding a random forcing term f (t) that varies with time: x0(t) = ax(t) + bx(t − t) + f (t), t ≥ 0, with initial condition x(t) = g(t), −t ≤ t ≤ 0. The coefficients a and b are assumed to be random variables, while the forcing term f (t) and the initial condition g(t) are stochastic processes on their respective time domains. The equation is regarded in the Lebesgue space Lp of random variables with finite p-th moment. The deterministic solution constructed with the method of steps and the method of variation of constants, which involves the delayed exponential function, is proved to be an Lp-solution, under certain assumptions on the random data. This proof requires the extension of the deterministic Leibniz’s integral rule for differentiation to the random scenario. Finally, we also prove that, when the delay t tends to 0, the random delay equation tends in Lp to a random equation with no delay. Numerical experiments illustrate how our methodology permits determining the main statistics of the solution process, thereby allowing for uncertainty quantification.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral and Differential Structure on the Free C∞-Ring Modality
    INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THE FREE C1-RING MODALITY Geoffrey CRUTTWELL Jean-Simon Pacaud LEMAY Rory B. B. LUCYSHYN-WRIGHT Resum´ e.´ Les categories´ integrales´ ont et´ e´ recemment´ developp´ ees´ comme homologues aux categories´ differentielles.´ En particulier, les categories´ inte-´ grales sont equip´ ees´ d’un operateur´ d’integration,´ appele´ la transformation integrale,´ dont les axiomes gen´ eralisent´ les identites´ d’integration´ de base du calcul comme l’integration´ par parties. Cependant, la litterature´ sur les categories´ integrales´ ne contient aucun exemple decrivant´ l’integration´ de fonctions lisses arbitraires : les exemples les plus proches impliquent l’inte-´ gration de fonctions polynomiales. Cet article comble cette lacune en develo-´ ppant un exemple de categorie´ integrale´ dont la transformation integrale´ agit sur des 1-formes differentielles´ lisses. De plus, nous fournissons un autre point de vue sur la structure differentielle´ de cet exemple cle,´ nous etudions´ les derivations´ et les coder´ elictions´ dans ce contexte et nous prouvons que les anneaux C1 libres sont des algebres` de Rota-Baxter. Abstract. Integral categories were recently developed as a counterpart to differential categories. In particular, integral categories come equipped with an integration operator, known as an integral transformation, whose axioms generalize the basic integration identities from calculus such as integration by parts. However, the literature on integral categories contains no example that captures integration of arbitrary smooth functions: the closest are exam- ples involving integration of polynomial functions. This paper fills in this gap G.C,J-S.P.L,R.L-W INT.& DIFF. STRUCT. ON C1-RING MOD. by developing an example of an integral category whose integral transforma- tion operates on smooth 1-forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3 the Lebesgue Integral
    Lecture 3:The Lebesgue Integral 1 of 14 Course: Theory of Probability I Term: Fall 2013 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 3 The Lebesgue Integral The construction of the integral Unless expressly specified otherwise, we pick and fix a measure space (S, S, m) and assume that all functions under consideration are defined there. Definition 3.1 (Simple functions). A function f 2 L0(S, S, m) is said to be simple if it takes only a finite number of values. The collection of all simple functions is denoted by LSimp,0 (more precisely by LSimp,0(S, S, m)) and the family of non-negative simple Simp,0 functions by L+ . Clearly, a simple function f : S ! R admits a (not necessarily unique) representation n f = ∑ ak1Ak , (3.1) k=1 for a1,..., an 2 R and A1,..., An 2 S. Such a representation is called the simple-function representation of f . When the sets Ak, k = 1, . , n are intervals in R, the graph of the simple function f looks like a collection of steps (of heights a1,..., an). For that reason, the simple functions are sometimes referred to as step functions. The Lebesgue integral is very easy to define for non-negative simple functions and this definition allows for further generalizations1: 1 In fact, the progression of events you will see in this section is typical for measure theory: you start with indica- Definition 3.2 (Lebesgue integration for simple functions). For f 2 tor functions, move on to non-negative Simp,0 R simple functions, then to general non- L+ we define the (Lebesgue) integral f dm of f with respect to m negative measurable functions, and fi- by nally to (not-necessarily-non-negative) Z n f dm = a m(A ) 2 [0, ¥], measurable functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure, Integrals, and Transformations: Lebesgue Integration and the Ergodic Theorem
    Measure, Integrals, and Transformations: Lebesgue Integration and the Ergodic Theorem Maxim O. Lavrentovich November 15, 2007 Contents 0 Notation 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Sizes, Sets, and Things . 2 1.2 The Extended Real Numbers . 3 2 Measure Theory 5 2.1 Preliminaries . 5 2.2 Examples . 8 2.3 Measurable Functions . 12 3 Integration 15 3.1 General Principles . 15 3.2 Simple Functions . 20 3.3 The Lebesgue Integral . 28 3.4 Convergence Theorems . 33 3.5 Convergence . 40 4 Probability 41 4.1 Kolmogorov's Probability . 41 4.2 Random Variables . 44 5 The Ergodic Theorem 47 5.1 Transformations . 47 5.2 Birkho®'s Ergodic Theorem . 52 5.3 Conclusions . 60 6 Bibliography 63 0 Notation We will be using the following notation throughout the discussion. This list is included here as a reference. Also, some of the concepts and symbols will be de¯ned in subsequent sections. However, due to the number of di®erent symbols we will use, we have compiled the more archaic ones here. lR; lN : the real and natural numbers lR¹ : the extended natural numbers, i.e. the interval [¡1; 1] ¹ lR+ : the nonnegative (extended) real numbers, i.e. the interval [0; 1] ­ : a sample space, a set of possible outcomes, or any arbitrary set F : an arbitrary σ-algebra on subsets of a set ­ σ hAi : the σ-algebra generated by a subset A ⊆ ­. T : a function between the set ­ and ­ itself Á, Ã : simple functions on the set ­ ¹ : a measure on a space ­ with an associated σ-algebra F (Xn) : a sequence of objects Xi, i.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Lebesgue Integral Dered Numbers Cn, Cn < Cn+1, Which Is Finite Or
    106 2. THE LEBESGUE INTEGRATION THEORY 14. Lebesgue integral 14.1. Piecewise continuous functions on R. Consider a collection of or- dered numbers cn, cn < cn+1, which is finite or countable. Suppose that any interval (a,b) contains only finitely many numbers cn. Con- sider open intervals Ωn =(cn,cn+1). If the set of numbers cn contains the smallest number m, then the interval Ω− = (−∞,m) is added to the set of intervals {Ωn}. If the set of numbers cn contains the greatest + number M, then the interval Ω = (M, ∞) is added to {Ωn}. The − union of the closures Ωn =[cn,cn+1] (and possibly Ω =(−∞,m] and Ω+ =[M, ∞)) is the whole real line R. So, the characteristic properties of the collection {Ωn} are: 0 (i) Ωn ∩ Ωn0 = ∅ , n =6 n (ii) (a,b) ∩{Ωn} = {cj,cj+1,...,cm} , (iii) Ωn = R , [n Property (ii) also means that any bounded interval is covered by finitely many intervals Ωn. Alternatively, the sequence of endpoints cn is not allowed to have a limit point. For example, let cn = n where n is an integer. Then any interval (a,b) contains only finitely many integers. The real line R is the union of intervals [n, n+1] because every real x either lies between two integers or coincides with an integer. If cn is the collection of all non-negative integers, then R is the union of I− = (−∞, 0] and all [n, n + 1], n = 1 0, 1,.... However, the collection cn = n , n = 1, 2,..., does not have the property that any interval (a,b) contains only finitely many elements cn because 0 <cn < 2 for all n.
    [Show full text]