DOCSLIB.ORG

The Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Bosnia and Herzegovina http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 14465 08 January 2018 The honouring of obligations and commitments by Bosnia and Herzegovina Report1 Co-rapporteurs: Sir Roger GALE, United Kingdom, European Conservatives Group, and Mr Tiny KOX, Netherlands, Group of the Unified European Left Summary After almost 16 years of membership in the Council of Europe, Bosnia and Herzegovina should step up efforts to implement the country’s obligations and remaining commitments to the Organisation. While respecting the Entities’ and the Brčko District’s autonomy, the necessary reforms should be implemented on the basis of a shared vision of the development of the country’s institutions. This requires a fully fledged constitutional reform, without which the country’s democratic institutions cannot function properly and Bosnia and Herzegovina cannot become a genuinely civic State of all its citizens. The Monitoring Committee is concerned about the increase in nationalist and ethnic rhetoric, especially in the context of the election campaign for the October 2018 general elections. It is also concerned about the growing disrespect for the rule of law and urges the authorities to implement, ahead of the 2018 elections, final and binding decisions of the Constitutional Court, notably as regards election reform for the city of Mostar and the completion of the Federation House of Peoples. To fulfil the membership obligations and commitments, the committee expects Bosnia and Herzegovina to take a number of concrete actions, in accordance with the recommendations contained in the present report. Pending their implementation, it proposes that the Assembly continues the monitoring procedure with respect to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 1. Reference to committee: Resolution 1115 (1997). F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | assembly@coe.int | Tel: +33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 Doc. 14465 Report Contents Page A. Draft resolution......................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Explanatory memorandum by Sir Roger Gale and Mr Tiny Kox, co-rapporteurs...................................... 6 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. The monitoring procedure............................................................................................................6 1.2. Co-operation with the Council of Europe......................................................................................6 1.3. The economic situation................................................................................................................ 7 1.4. The 2013 census......................................................................................................................... 7 2. The Dayton Peace Agreement and the role of the High Representative..............................................8 2.1. The Dayton Peace Agreement.....................................................................................................8 2.2. Function and role of the High Representative.............................................................................. 9 2.3. Threats to the Dayton Peace Agreement...................................................................................10 3. The consequences of the 1992-95 war.............................................................................................. 11 3.1. Prosecution of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity........................................... 11 4. Relations with the European Union, NATO and regional co-operation...............................................14 4.1. Relations with the European Union............................................................................................14 4.2. Regional co-operation................................................................................................................15 4.3. Relations with NATO..................................................................................................................16 5. Democratic institutions.......................................................................................................................17 5.1. 2014 general elections and electoral developments.................................................................. 17 5.2. Changes to the electoral legislation........................................................................................... 19 5.3. Political developments in the run-up to the 2016 local elections: the referendum on the Republika Srpska national day..........................................................................................................20 5.4. The 2016 local elections............................................................................................................ 21 5.5. Situation in Mostar..................................................................................................................... 22 5.6. Local self-government................................................................................................................23 5.7. Constitutional reform..................................................................................................................23 5.8. Justice reform............................................................................................................................ 26 6. Rule of Law........................................................................................................................................29 6.1. Fight against corruption and organised crime............................................................................ 29 6.2. Money laundering and financing of terrorism............................................................................. 30 6.3. Fight against terrorism............................................................................................................... 31 6.4. Fight against torture and ill-treatment.........................................................................................32 7. Human rights......................................................................................................................................32 7.1. Fight against discrimination........................................................................................................32 7.2. Protection of minorities...............................................................................................................33 7.3. Fight against the trafficking in human beings............................................................................. 33 7.4. Media and freedom of expression..............................................................................................34 7.5. The Ombudspersons institution................................................................................................. 35 7.6. Education...................................................................................................................................37 7.7. Culture and cultural heritage...................................................................................................... 38 2 Doc. 14465 Report A. Draft resolution2 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina joined the Council of Europe on 24 April 2002. Since then, the authorities have implemented all the formal commitments entered into upon accession. To date, Bosnia and Herzegovina has signed and ratified 90 Council of Europe conventions. 2. The Parliamentary Assembly congratulates the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the adoption of an ambitious reform agenda in July 2015 and on officially submitting in February 2016 its application for membership of the European Union. 3. The Assembly also welcomes the long-awaited publication in 2016 of the 2013 population and household census, and the progress made in the implementation of the revised strategy for the implementation of Annex VII to the Dayton Peace Agreement on the return of refugees and internally displaced persons. 4. The Assembly considers that the issue of missing persons should remain high on the authorities’ agenda and expects the Missing Persons Institute to receive the necessary budgetary means. 5. The Assembly regrets the slow pace of implementation of the 2009 National War Crime Strategy: the 2015 deadline for the most complex cases was not met, and investigations into alleged war crimes against at least 7 000 people remain to be resolved by December 2023. The Assembly urges both the Entities and the State to ensure that the judiciary is sufficiently funded. 6. The Assembly is pleased to note that the Central Election Commission organised the 2014 general elections and the 2016 local elections in a professional and efficient manner and constantly strives to promote further technical improvements to the voting procedures. 7. However, the Assembly notes that the 2014 elections were held for the second time under a legal and constitutional framework which is in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No. 5) since the 2009 judgment in the case of Sejdić and Finci: once again, only Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks could run for the State Presidency or be elected/appointed to the State House of Peoples. 8. No constitutional amendments to solve this fundamental issue have been adopted to date. The Assembly urges once again all political stakeholders to shoulder their responsibilities
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

33 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of the Conditions in the Area of Child Rights and Their
    ANALYSISANALYSIS OFOF THETHE CONDITIONSCONDITIONS ININ THETHE AREAAREA OFOF CHILDCHILD RIGHTSRIGHTS ANDAND THEIRTHEIR IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION ININ PRESCHOOLPRESCHOOL UPBRINGINGUPBRINGING ANDAND EDUCATIONEDUCATION Analysis of the conditions in the area of child rights and their implementation in preschool upbringing and education THE INSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OMBUDSMEN OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2 ANALYSIS OF THE CONDITIONS IN THE AREA OF CHILD RIGHTS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN PRESCHOOL UPBRINGING AND EDUCATION Contents I Introduction 5 II Methodology 6 III Legal Frame 7 3.1. Preschool upbringing and education – approach based on human rights 7 3.2. Preschool upbringing and education in the light of international standards 8 3.2.1. Responsibility of applying of international standards 10 3.2.2. The point of view of UN Committee on child rights 13 3.3. Preschool upbringing and education in legislation of B&H 14 3.3.1 Constitution frame 14 3.3.2. Legislation frame 15 3.3.2.1. The Framework Law on preschool education 16 3.3.2.2. Legislation on preschool upbringing and education in Brčko District 24 3.3.2.3. Preschool upbringing and education in Republic of Srpska 28 3.3.2.4. Preschool upbringing and education in FB&H 35 3.3.2.4.1. Preschool upbringing and education in Canton Sarajevo 36 3.3.2.4.2. Other Cantons 40 3.3.3. Common core curricula of the comprehensive development programs for work in preschool institutions 41 3.3.4. Pedagogic standards for preschool upbringing and education and norms for the facilities, equipment and didactic material for preschool upbringing and education 41 3.3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTER of NATIONAL DAYS DATE COUNTRY TITLE January 01
    REGISTER OF NATIONAL DAYS DATE COUNTRY TITLE January 01 Cuba Anniversary of the Revolution 01 Haiti Independence Day 07 Maldives National Day 26 Australia National Day 26 India Republic Day February 04 Sri Lanka Independence Day 06 New Zealand National Day 07 Grenada Independence Day 11 Iran National Day 11 Japan National Day 15 Serbia National Day 16 Democratic People’s Birthday of Chairman Republic of Korea Kim Jong II 16 Lithuania National Day 18 The Gambia Independence Day 22 Saint Lucia Independence Day 23 Guyana Republic Day 24 Estonia Independence Day 27 Dominican Republic Independence Day March 01 Bosnia & Herzegovina Independence Day 03 Bulgaria National Day 06 Ghana National Day 12 Mauritius Republic Day 18 Aruba National Day 20 Tunisia National Day 23 Pakistan Pakistan Day 25 Greece Independence Day April 01 Iran National Day 04 Senegal National Day 09 Iraq National Day 16 Kingdom of Birthday of H. M. Denmark The Queen 19 Holy See Anniversary of the Elevation of His Holiness the Pope to the Pontificate 21 United Kingdom Official Birthday of of Great Britain H.M. The Queen 27 South Africa Freedom Day 30 Kingdom of Birthday of H.M. Sweden The King 30 Kingdom of the National Day – Netherlands Queen’s Birthday May 01 Marshall Islands National Day 03 Poland Constitution Day 09 EEC Europe Day 12 Israel National Day 15 Paraguay Independence Day 17 Norway Constitution Day 25 Argentina National Day 26 Georgia Independence Day 26 Guyana Independence Day 28 Armenia National Day 28 Azerbaijan National Day 28 Ethiopia National Day June 02 Italy National Day 05 Kingdom of Constitution Day Denmark 06 Kingdom of Sweden National Day 10 Portugal National Day 12 Philippines National Day 12 Russian Federation National Day 17 Iceland Republic Day 18 Seychelles National Day 23 Luxembourg National Day 24 Sovereign Military Order of Malta St.
    [Show full text]
  • 'International Community' and the Limits of External Intervention
    Issue 2 November 2016 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE ‘International community’ and the limits of external intervention ZAGREB SARAJEVO BEOGRAD Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Fostering democracy and upholding human rights, taking action to prevent the destruction of the global ecosystem, advancing equality between women and men, securing peace through conflict prevention in crisis zones, and defending the freedom of individuals against excessive state and economic power – these are the objectives that drive the ideas and actions of the Heinrich Böll Foundation. We maintain close ties to the German Green Party (Alliance 90/The Greens) and as a think tank for green visions and projects, we are part of an international net work encompassing well over 100 partner projects in approxi mately 60 countries. The Heinrich Böll Foundation works independently and nurtures a spirit of intellectual openness. We maintain a world wide network with currently 30 international offices. Our work in Bosnia and Herzegovina concentrates on the democratization process, political education, and environmental protection and sustainable development. We support and open public fora about topical and marginalized social-political issues and we enable networking of local and international actors close to the Green values. Contents 2 Introductory note Srđan Dvornik Aiding Democracy from Abroad 4 Talking the Talk and Walking the "Unlocked Path" Walk: EU, BiH and the Quality of Democracy Tijana Cvjetićanin 9 The Macedonian Political Crisis – EU Mechanisms Tested Malinka Ristevska Jordanova
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnian Muslim Reformists Between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina
    Empire, Nation, and the Islamic World: Bosnian Muslim Reformists between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Harun Buljina All rights reserved ABSTRACT Empire, Nation, and the Islamic World: Bosnian Muslim Reformists between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina This dissertation is a study of the early 20th-century Pan-Islamist reform movement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, tracing its origins and trans-imperial development with a focus on the years 1901-1914. Its central figure is the theologian and print entrepreneur Mehmed Džemaludin Čaušević (1870-1938), who returned to his Austro-Hungarian-occupied home province from extended studies in the Ottoman lands at the start of this period with an ambitious agenda of communal reform. Čaušević’s project centered on tying his native land and its Muslim inhabitants to the wider “Islamic World”—a novel geo-cultural construct he portrayed as a viable model for communal modernization. Over the subsequent decade, he and his followers founded a printing press, standardized the writing of Bosnian in a modified Arabic script, organized the country’s Ulema, and linked these initiatives together in a string of successful Arabic-script, Ulema-led, and theologically modernist print publications. By 1914, Čaušević’s supporters even brought him to a position of institutional power as Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Reis-ul-Ulema (A: raʾīs al-ʿulamāʾ), the country’s highest Islamic religious authority and a figure of regional influence between two empires.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations S
    UNITED NATIONS S Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1994/674/Add.2 (Vol. III) 28 December 1994 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH FINAL REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION OF EXPERTS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 780 (1992) ANNEX VI.A INCIDENT STUDY REPORT REGARDING MORTAR SHELLING DOBRINJA, SARAJEVO ON 1 JUNE 1993: INVESTIGATION Under the Direction of: William J. Fenrick Member and Rapporteur on On-Site Investigations, Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992) Prepared by: Members of Canada's Contributed Personnel to the Commission of Experts (Canadian War Crimes Investigation Team) PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/5887b3/ S/1994/674/Annex VII Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. METHODOLOGY . 1 - 5 3 II. INCIDENT STUDY . 6 - 18 4 III. FINDINGS . 19 - 21 5 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/5887b3/ S/1994/674/Annex VII Page 3 I. METHODOLOGY 1. This study resulted from an investigation conducted by Sergeant J.L. Lamothe and Warrant Officer S. Murray-Ford, Canadian Forces Military Police, as part of the Canadian Investigation Team. They were part of an investigative group consisting of the Rapporteur for On-Site Investigations, a representative of the Secretariat and the Canadian War Crimes Investigation Team (WCIT), which was comprised of three military lawyers and four military police investigators. The group was deployed to the territory of the former Yugoslavia for the period of 20 June to 10 July 1993 and was in Sarajevo for the period of 24 June to 8 July 1993. The WCIT, in general, consisted of military personnel from the Canadian Office of the Judge Advocate General as well as military investigators who were seconded from Canada to the Commission of Experts for specific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Answers of Civil Society Organizations to the European Commission Questionnaire
    SARAJEVO OPEN CENTRE AND HELSINKI CITIZENS’ ASSEMBLY BANJA LUKA On Behalf Of The Initiative For Monitoring Of The European Integration Of Bosnia And Herzegovina ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION QUESTIONNAIRE SARAJEVO OPEN CENTER AND HELSINKI CITIZENS’ ASSEMBLY BANJA LUKA ON BEHALF OF THE INITIATIVE FOR MONITORING OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION QUESTIONNAIRE Sarajevo, June 2017 www.soc.ba - www.hcabl.org - www.eu-monitoring.ba Title ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION QUESTIONNAIRE Publishers Sarajevo Open Center and Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Banja Luka on behalf of the Initiative for Monitoring of the European Integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina Editors Tijana Cvjetićanin, Why Not, Sarajevo Dragana Dardić, Helsinski Citizens’ Assembly Banja Luka Inela Hadžić, Sarajevo Open Center Following organizations contributed with the answers (alphabetical): Balkan Investigative Reporting Network BiH, Damir Banović, Fondacija Lara, Forum ZFD BiH, GENESIS Project, Helsinški parlament građana Banja Luka, Hope and Homes for Children BiH, Lejla Gačanica, ispred Inicijative Građanke za ustavne promjene, MyRight, Neformalna Grupa za čist zrak iz Tuzle, Savez MeNeRaLi, Sarajevski otvoreni centar, Transparency International BiH, Trial International u BiH, Zašto ne, Žene ženama. Translation BHS - ENG Alma Hamza Design Maja Ilić Layout Lejla Huremović Translation of
    [Show full text]
  • The 2016 REFERENDUM in BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA Kurt W
    East European Quarterly Vol. 45, No. 1-2 pp. 99-111, March-June 2017 © Central European University 2017 ISSN: 0012-8449 (print) 2469-4827 (online) The 2016 REFERENDUM IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Kurt W. Bassuener Democratization Policy Council Berlin Armina Mujanovic Democratization Policy Council Sarajevo Outline The referendum, the first since the 1992-1995 war, was held on September 25, 2016 in the Republika Srpska (RS), one of the country's two entities. The referendum was called by RS President Milorad Dodik as a plebiscite on maintaining January 9 as Republika Srpska Day, which the BiH Constitutional Court ruled unconstitutional. The referendum unsurprisingly elicited a vote in favor of maintaining RS Day, although turnout, at just under 56%, was lower than Prime Minister Dodik desired. The RS opposition fared poorly in the municipal elections which followed a week later, on October 2. RS President Dodik stated immediately afterward that he would hold a referendum on RS independence in 2018. Background Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) has a particularly complex governance structure, owing to the 1992-1995 war and the Dayton Peace Accords which ended it. The country is comprised of two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereafter “the Federation”) and the Republika Srpska (hereafter RS), each comprising roughly half the territory, as well as the Brcko District, created by binding arbitration after the war, which was disputed in the Dayton negotiations. BiH’s state structure at Dayton was largely designed around the prerogatives of the entities (and in the Federation’s case, ten cantons), including many governing functions that would typically be held at the state level, such as justice, defense, and internal affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving the Commonwealth: Explanations from Different Viewpoints
    Leaving the Commonwealth: explanations from different viewpoints Naam: Rixte Schermerhorn Studentnummer: 1509381 Docent: Wouter Veenendaal Bachelorproject: Kleine Staten Datum: 12-6-2017 Woordenaantal: 8315 1 Introduction Following The Gambia leaving the Commonwealth in 2013 (Hultin, Jallow, Lawrance, & Sarr, 2017), President Yameen of the Maldives recently announced in October 2016 that his country would also be leaving the Commonwealth (Safi, 2016). It is unusual for members states to leave the Commonwealth, few states that have done so usually later rejoined. Moreover, most states that did leave the Commonwealth were actually suspended from the organisation. That small states are leaving the Commonwealth at all is striking, due to the perceived benefits of being a member of the organisation. These supposed benefits range from financial resources for projects to technical assistance and policy recommendations (Commonwealth Secretariat, 2014a). However, after the presidential elections in December 2016, the new president of The Gambia announced that his state would be rejoining the Commonwealth (BBC, 2017). Consequently, this shows that the organisation still holds some appealing qualities for small states. Thus, by using the Maldives and The Gambia as case studies, the arguments for leaving the organisation despite the supposed benefits of being a member state are considered. This thesis aims to outline the various arguments on why the small states left the Commonwealth. It will predominantly focus on the arguments given in the small states the Maldives and The Gambia, whilst also taking into account the comparative views of the Commonwealth. This thesis is also of social relevance as it provides insight into how former colonies deal with their colonial past and their own identity, as well as highlighting the relationship small states have with an international organisation (‘IO’) set up by their former coloniser.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Holidays and Observances Weekday Date Holiday Name Countries Where This Is Observed (Might Not Be Complete)
    Upcoming holidays and observances Weekday Date Holiday name Countries where this is observed (might not be complete) Tuesday Aug 2 Emancipation Barbados Day observed Tuesday Aug 2 Our Lady of Costa Rica Los Ángeles Tuesday Aug 2 Republic Day Macedonia, Republic of Wednesday Aug 3 The Royal St Canada John's Regatta (Regatta Day) Wednesday Aug 3 Freedom Day Equatorial Guinea Wednesday Aug 3 Martyrs' Day Guinea-Bissau Wednesday Aug 3 Nigerien Niger Independence Day Wednesday Aug 3 Flag´s Day Venezuela Wednesday Aug 3 Election Day South Africa Wednesday Aug 3 Municipal South Africa Elections Wednesday Aug 3 Farmers Day Zambia Thursday Aug 4 Celebrations El Salvador of San Upcoming holidays and observances Weekday Date Holiday name Countries where this is observed (might not be complete) Salvador Thursday Aug 4 National Venezuela Guard´s Day Friday Aug 5 Rio 2016 Brazil Summer Olympics start Friday Aug 5 The Day of Spain Our Lady of Africa Friday Aug 5 Homeland Croatia Thanksgiving Day Friday Aug 5 Celebrations El Salvador of San Salvador Saturday Aug 6 Independence Bolivia Day Saturday Aug 6 Independence Jamaica Day Saturday Aug 6 Celebrations El Salvador of San Salvador Sunday Aug 7 Independence Cote d'Ivoire Day Upcoming holidays and observances Weekday Date Holiday name Countries where this is observed (might not be complete) Sunday Aug 7 Battle of Colombia Boyacá Day Monday Aug 8 Peace Festival Germany Monday Aug 8 Peasants' Day Tanzania Monday Aug 8 Victory Day United States Monday Aug 8 Heroes' Day Zimbabwe Tuesday Aug 9 Double Seven
    [Show full text]
  • Annex Vi.B the Battle of Sarajevo and the Law of Armed Conflict
    UNITED NATIONS S Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1994/674/Add.2 (Vol. III) 28 December 1994 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH FINAL REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION OF EXPERTS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 780 (1992) ANNEX VI.B THE BATTLE OF SARAJEVO AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT Prepared by: William J. Fenrick Member and Rapporteur on On-Site Investigations, Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992) and Major A.J. van Veen, Canadian Armed Forces; Member of Canada's Contributed Personnel to the Commission of Experts S/1994/674/Annex VI.B Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. METHODOLOGY . 1 - 8 3 II. CONSIDERATIONS . 9 4 III. BACKGROUND . 10 - 15 4 IV. THE BATTLE . 16 - 53 6 A. Organization, command, control and equipment . 17 - 31 6 B. Tactics used during the battle . 32 - 49 10 C. Casualties . 50 - 53 14 Table #1 . 15 Table #2 . 16 Table #3 . 18 V. APPLICABLE LAW . 54 - 56 20 VI. COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY . 57 - 59 20 VII. THE MILITARY OBJECTIVE . 60 - 61 21 VIII. SIEGE WARFARE . 62 - 66 23 IX. VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT . 67 - 83 24 A. Starvation as a method of warfare . 73 - 77 25 B. Attacks on civilian persons and objects . 78 - 83 26 X. ACCOUNTABILITY . 84 - 90 28 Appendix I. Anecdotal account of the battle (derived from UN reports)............ 31 S/1994/674/Annex VI.B Page 3 I. METHODOLOGY 1. This study was conducted by the Rapporteur for On-Site Investigations and Major A.J. van Veen. They were part of an investigative group consisting of the Rapporteur, a representative of the Secretariat, and the Canadian War Crimes Investigation Team (WCIT), which was comprised of three military lawyers and four military police investigators.
    [Show full text]
  • To Intervene, Or Not to Intervene? Developing an Understanding on the Relationship Between International Intervention and the Ethnification of Politics
    To intervene, or not to intervene? Developing an understanding on the relationship between international intervention and the ethnification of politics BIANCA BUCEC Master's Thesis Spring 2021 Word Count: 21459 words Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University Supervisor: Johan Brosche 1 ABSTRACT This study explores the relationship between international intervention and the ethnification of politics and seeks to explain the degree to which international involvement affects the degree of ethnification of politics. Deriving from explanations that suggest that the ethnification of politics is attributed to the greater interethnic trust facilitated through credible institutions, this study argues that the ethnification of politics is lower in cases where the greater involvement by the international intervention in local institution-building can be observed. Using the method of structure focused comparison, the suggested hypothesis is tested on two cities in Bosnia and Hercegovina – Mostar and Sarajevo. Data was collected through a manual empirical analysis and the tracing of historical institution-building actions by the international community in each city. The main finding shows relative support for the causal relationship; however, the observed causal mechanism is different to the expected one. This signals that the degree of international involvement in local institution-building processes cannot, in isolation, explain variation on the ethnification of politics. Thus, further research is needed to both identify additional causal factors and build the interaction effects that can explain the observed variation. Keywords: post-war politics, international intervention, ethnification of politics, Mostar, Sarajevo 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would be incomplete without the support, understanding, and compassion given to me by many along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Political Briefing: War Crimes and the Current Politics of Republika Srpska Zvonimir Stopić
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 37, No. 1 (BH) February 2021 Bosnia-Herzegovina political briefing: War crimes and the current politics of Republika Srpska Zvonimir Stopić 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. office@china-cee.eu Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 War crimes and the current politics of Republika Srpska With the beginning of the year 2021, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s politics completed yet another more or less expected circle. Ever since the end of the war, every year in Bosnia and Herzegovina starts with the controversies surrounding the Day of Republika Srpska, which is persistently celebrated on the date (January 9th) found unconstitutional by the Constitutional court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Every year in Bosnia and Herzegovina thus begins with the reemergence of painful memories of war, which only ad more proof to the continuous realization of both the Bosnia and Herzegovina’s inability to spur internal change and of the depth of political issues which prevent change in the first place. In this briefing we will present some elements of the extremism of Republika Srpska’s leadership, which in the past several months could have been noticed kindling underneath the political surface covered by the COVID-19 and the preparation for the local (municipal) elections. January 9th On January 9th, 1992, prior to the proclamation of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s independency, the Assembly of the Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina proclaimed an independent entity within Bosnia and Herzegovina, which in the further step was to separate from Bosnia and Herzegovina and join Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]