Polls, Elections and Australian Political History Rodney Tiffen Looks at the Pitfalls of Poll-Watching and the Lessons of Postwar History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polls, Elections and Australian Political History Rodney Tiffen Looks at the Pitfalls of Poll-Watching and the Lessons of Postwar History Inside Story | inside.org.au | August 2010 Polls, elections and Australian political history Rodney Tiffen looks at the pitfalls of poll-watching and the lessons of postwar history here have been so many records set recently in only two federal governments defeated after only one Australian politics that the politicians should be term? Or else, will she follow Paul Keating as the only Ttested for steroids. We began the current leader at either state or federal level – at least in the last electoral cycle with the personal defeat of a prime half century – to win an election after deposing their minister for only the second time in 110 years, with predecessor? John Howard following the 1929 precedent of Stanley For Julia Gillard defeat will mean an even more Bruce and being swept from parliament. Then, for the odious entry into the record books. She is already first time, the Liberals staged two leadership coups Australia’s first female prime minister, our first Welsh- within three years. Finally – and again for the first time born prime minister, and the first PM to take office ever – a successful leadership coup was launched with a de facto partner. But if the current polls are an against a first-term prime minister, the leader who had accurate indicator she is at grave risk of becoming achieved the equal-third-biggest winning swing since Australia’s second-shortest-ever reigning prime the second world war. minister. This raises an obvious question. Will this month’s Australia has had three “caretaker” prime ministers – election follow the precedent of the 1931 election, with deputies who took over when the incumbent died in Julia Gillard joining James Scullin as leader of one of office but were always known to be temporary. The three are Earle Page (1939, for twenty days after the Above: Julia Gillard and treasurer Wayne Swan board death of Joe Lyons); Franke Forde (1945, for eight days the media bus in Sydney on 3 August, heading for a after the death of John Curtin); John McEwen day of campaigning on the central coast. (1967–68, for twenty-three days after the death of AAP Image/Alan Porritt Harold Holt). Of the twenty-four real prime ministers, the shortest- the two major parties has been lowest have occurred at serving was Arthur Fadden, who took over as head of the most recent elections. Although there were earlier government after the collapse of the Menzies coalition occasions when “Others” have attracted a substantial government in 1941. His stormy rule lasted for “forty vote (notably in the 1958 and 1977 elections after the days and forty nights,” in the words of one writer, formation of, respectively, the Democratic Labor Party before two independents in the House voted him out of and the Australian Democrats as nationally organised office. John Curtin’s Labor government took over and parties), it now looks to have become a continuing prosecuted the war effort much more effectively. feature of the Australian landscape. When the DLP was If Julia Gillard loses the election (and resigns the next the largest minor party its preferences went day) she will have been prime minister for fifty-nine overwhelmingly to the Coalition; preferences from the days. She would displace the current second-place Democrats and especially the Greens have tended to go holder, John Christian Watson, who was prime minister mainly to Labor. for a total of 112 days in 1904 (and was Australia’s only Minor parties and independents are treated more Chilean-born Australian prime minister). Despite the kindly by Australia’s system of preferential voting than brevity of his tenure, Watson’s leadership had several by the first-past-the-post systems in Britain and the achievements. In particular, his was the first Labor United States. Voters can express both a preference for a government anywhere in the world. It was always a minority party with their first vote and a second minority government, and Watson governed during a preference for a major party that allows them to affect period when three parties of broadly equal strength the result if their preferred candidate has no hope. Table vied for office and short terms in government were the 3 orders the election results according to the winning norm. Between 1901 and 1910, Australia experienced margin in terms of the two-party-preferred vote. This seven prime ministerships. Much longer periods of measure, originally devised by Malcolm Mackerras, is incumbency are now the norm, making a Gillard Labor designed to take account of the two key facts about loss even more extraordinary. Australian elections: that (a) it is a preferential voting Given these dramatic developments and possibilities, system in which the distribution of second-preference it is little wonder that the media have been speculating votes from minor parties may be crucial; and (b) the so breathlessly about the election outcome. Each poll basic question in deciding who forms government is between now and the election will be greeted with which side – Labor or the Liberal–National Party exaggerated claims for its importance. To put this all in Coalition – has the majority. perspective, it’s useful to look back at the results from Table 3 reveals that although changes of government Australian federal elections since the second world war are infrequent, Australian elections tend to be close, and and examine the key issues in public opinion polling that a relatively small swing in the vote can change the and predicting elections. outcome. In thirteen of the twenty-five elections, the Since the war, there have been twenty-five elections two-party-preferred vote was 52:48 or closer, and in for the House of Representatives. As Table 1 shows, of seven of the eleven elections since 1980 it has been this those elections, the Coalition has won sixteen and close. The largest winning margin was Harold Holt’s Labor nine – the discrepancy largely reflecting the victory over Arthur Calwell in the 1966 “Vietnam” Liberals’ nine successive victories from 1949, giving election, and the second-biggest was Malcolm Fraser’s them twenty-three years continuously in office. Since victory following the dismissal of the Whitlam 1972, Labor has won eight elections and the Coalition government in 1975. seven. Table 1 also shows that the dominant pattern in On five occasions, the winning side actually received Australian elections is for incumbents to be re-elected. just under 50 per cent of the two-party preferred vote, On only six of twenty-five occasions has an election and if the distribution of votes between seats had been produced a change of government. different they could easily have lost. Each of these All governments have been formed by one of the two elections (1954, 1961, 1969, 1990, and 1998) was a case major parties, and their combined vote on all but one of an incumbent government being less preferred than occasion has been more than 80 per cent of the total. its opponent but managing to win because it retained But, as Table 2 shows, the number of people voting for its most vulnerable seats. Interestingly, the government minor parties and independents has been increasing. with the smallest ever winning share of the two-party Seven of the eight occasions when the combined vote of preferred vote was John Howard’s in 1998. 2 Table 1. Outcomes of Australian House of Representatives elections 1946–2007 Year Winning Incumbent Winning Losing Coalition Labor primary party result leader leader vote % vote % 1946 Labor GOVT Chifley Menzies 43.7 49.7 1949 Coalition OPPN Menzies Chifley 50.3 46.0 1951 Coalition GOVT Menzies Chifley 50.3 47.7 1954 Coalition GOVT Menzies Evatt 47.1 50.0 1955 Coalition GOVT Menzies Evatt 47.6 44.6 1958 Coalition GOVT Menzies Evatt 46.5 42.8 1961 Coalition GOVT Menzies Calwell 42.1 47.9 1963 Coalition GOVT Menzies Calwell 46.0 45.5 1966 Coalition GOVT Holt Calwell 50.0 40.0 1969 Coalition GOVT Gorton Whitlam 43.4 47.0 1972 Labor OPPN Whitlam McMahon 41.5 49.8 1974 Labor GOVT Whitlam Snedden 45.7 49.3 1975 Coalition OPPN Fraser Whitlam 53.1 42.8 1977 Coalition GOVT Fraser Whitlam 48.1 39.6 1980 Coalition GOVT Fraser Hayden 46.3 45.1 1983 Labor OPPN Hawke Fraser 43.6 49.5 1984 Labor GOVT Hawke Peacock 45.0 47.5 1987 Labor GOVT Hawke Howard 46.1 45.8 1990 Labor GOVT Hawke Peacock 43.4 39.4 1993 Labor GOVT Keating Hewson 44.3 44.9 1996 Coalition OPPN Howard Keating 46.9 38.8 1998 Coalition GOVT Howard Beazley 39.2 40.1 2001 Coalition GOVT Howard Beazley 42.7 37.8 2004 Coalition GOVT Howard Latham 46.7 37.6 2007 Labor OPPN Rudd Howard 42.1 43.3 Table 2. Percentage of votes for minor Table 4 orders these elections in terms of the net parties and independents at House of swing measured in two-party preferred terms. Two Representatives elections 1946–2007 general tendencies stand out. One is that in three- quarters of the elections, or nineteen of twenty-five, the Year Total Year Total swing was against the incumbent. On only seven other % other % occasions did the government improve its position in 1998 20.7 1980 8.6 an election – the Menzies government in 1955 and 1958 2001 19.5 1963 8.5 following the Labor split (in 1958 its share of the vote 1990 17.2 1987 8.1 fell very slightly, but it gained seats); in 1963 and 1966, 2004 15.7 1955 7.8 as Labor under Arthur Calwell fell further behind after 2007 14.6 1984 7.4 almost winning the 1961 “credit squeeze” election; Paul 1996 14.3 1983 6.9 Keating’s 1993 “Fightback!” election; and the 2001 and 1977 12.3 1946 6.6 2004 elections under John Howard.
Recommended publications
  • John Curtin's War
    backroom briefings John Curtin's war CLEM LLOYD & RICHARD HALL backroom briefings John Curtin's WAR edited by CLEM LLOYD & RICHARD HALL from original notes compiled by Frederick T. Smith National Library of Australia Canberra 1997 Front cover: Montage of photographs of John Curtin, Prime Minister of Australia, 1941-45, and of Old Parliament House, Canberra Photographs from the National Library's Pictorial Collection Back cover: Caricature of John Curtin by Dubois Bulletin, 8 October 1941 Published by the National Library of Australia Canberra ACT 2600 © National Library of Australia 1997 Introduction and annotations © Clem Lloyd and Richard Hall Every reasonable endeavour has been made to contact relevant copyright holders of illustrative material. Where this has not proved possible, the copyright holders are invited to contact the publisher. National Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data Backroom briefings: John Curtin's war. Includes index. ISBN 0 642 10688 6. 1. Curtin, John, 1885-1945. 2. World War, 1939-1945— Press coverage—Australia. 3. Journalism—Australia. I. Smith, FT. (Frederick T.). II. Lloyd, C.J. (Clement John), 1939- . III. Hall, Richard, 1937- . 940.5394 Editor: Julie Stokes Designer: Beverly Swifte Picture researcher/proofreader: Tony Twining Printed by Goanna Print, Canberra Published with the assistance of the Lloyd Ross Forum CONTENTS Fred Smith and the secret briefings 1 John Curtin's war 12 Acknowledgements 38 Highly confidential: press briefings, June 1942-January 1945 39 Introduction by F.T. Smith 40 Chronology of events; Briefings 42 Index 242 rederick Thomas Smith was born in Balmain, Sydney, Fon 18 December 1904, one of a family of two brothers and two sisters.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Winter 04.Indd
    cover story Punching Above Our Weight If Australia wants to maintain its influence in the world, it needs to keep reforming its economy and increase its population, says Paul Kelly ustralia’s opinion makers love to old fashioned debates we once had about power discuss our identity. Paul Keating were infected with racism, imperialism and a left the Lodge eight years ago but the cultural cringe that could only dismay today’s identity debate, while devoid of its sophisticated and cosmopolitan Australians. Past A previous passion, still exerts its hold leaders such as Billy Hughes, Arthur Calwell over the quality media. This is no bad thing. Yet and ‘Black’ Jack McEwen were obsessed with its endurance highlights by omission the debate Australia’s power, or rather its lack of power, Australia refuses to have—over the nature and and the ideas they championed of nationalistic extent of its power in the world. imperialism, racial-based mass immigration and This is a subject not to be raised in polite an unforgiving protectionism are now out of sight company and rarely to be confronted in the and out of mind, interned as the aberrations of straightjacket of Canberra officialdom. There are political primitives. other debates that command attention—our ties with America, our engagement with Asia, our counter-terrorism strategies and our defence force Paul Kelly is Editor-at-Large at The Australian. structure. But as a nation we prefer to discuss He is the author of numerous books including the various parts of our existence rather than the The End of Certainty: The Story of the 1980s totality of our existence.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Nation Building Or Cold War: Political Settings for the Arnhem Land Expedition
    3. Nation Building or Cold War: Political settings for the Arnhem Land Expedition Kim Beazley Frank M. Setzler, the Deputy Leader of the Arnhem Land Expedition and its senior American, described in his diary the Expedition’s chief Australian political patron, Arthur Calwell, after their first meeting: Met Mr Arthur Calwell, Minister of Immigration and Information, who is a most delightful politician with a sharp tongue, quick wit, and keen mind. He has red hair and talks out of the side of his mouth. He has cousins and has visited them here in the US (Pennsylvania).1 In a sentence, Setzler captured the attributes that would take Calwell to the leadership of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), but which also killed his political career when, a generation later, telegenic requirements either advanced or impaired a political career. Setzler was documenting a meeting with the minister on 25 February 1948 at the outset of their pre-expedition meetings in Canberra. Later he described a convivial Arthur Calwell at a cocktail party at the American Embassy, and the next day at an equally lubricated gathering hosted by the minister in Parliament, also attended by Opposition Leader, Robert Menzies.2 These functions were a peaceful social interlude at the beginning of two of the most bitter years in Australian politics, which were the prelude to the longest- serving government in Australia’s history, led at the outset by the man who introduced Setzler to sparkling Porphyry Pearl at the gathering mentioned above: R. G. Menzies. The Expedition—arguably the most dramatic manifestation of Australian– American scientific collaboration—was a quiet backdrop to an intense debate that went to the heart of Australian political culture at the onset of the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leader of the Opposition
    The Leader of the Opposition ‘…just as there can be no good or stable government without a sound majority, so there will be a dictatorial government unless there is the constant criticism of an intelligent, active, and critical opposition.’ –Sir Robert Menzies, 1948 The practice in Australia is for the leader of the party or coalition that can secure a majority in the House of Representatives to be appointed as Prime Minister. The leader of the largest party or Hon. Dr. H.V. Evatt coalition outside the government serves as Leader of the Opposition. Leader of the Opposition 1951 - 1960 The Leader of the Opposition is his or her party’s candidate for Prime National Library of Australia Minister at a general election. Each party has its own internal rules for the election of a party leader. Since 1967, the Leader of the Opposition has appointed a Shadow Ministry which offers policy alternatives and criticism on various portfolios. The Leader of the Opposition is, by convention, always a member of the House of Representatives and sits opposite the Prime Minister in the chamber. The Senate leader of the opposition party is referred to as the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, even if they lead a majority of Senators. He or she usually has a senior Shadow Ministry role. Australia has an adversarial parliamentary system in which the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition face off against one another during debates in the House of Representatives. The Opposition’s role is to hold the government accountable to the people and to Parliament, as well as to provide alternative policies in a range of areas.
    [Show full text]
  • EDWARD GOUGH WHITLAM Ac Qc 1916–2014
    THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2014–15 61 EDWARD GOUGH WHITLAM ac qc 1916–2014 was promoted two years later to a post in Sydney, then assistant crown solicitor in Canberra in 1927. As crown solicitor from 1937 he was closely involved in the drafting of wartime legislation and post-war reconstruction. Fred and Martha were devout Baptists and teetotallers, lovers of the arts (though Martha was deaf) and imbued with an ethos of civic service. Their son Gough abandoned formal worship, imbibed moderately, delighted in most cultural forms and devoted his talents to the public betterment. Like Thomas Macaulay, the child spoke from the outset in perfectly formed sentences. His schooling began in Sydney and was completed in Canberra, where he excelled in languages, history and literature. He completed an honours degree in Arts at the University of Sydney in English, Latin and Greek, with the intention of becoming a classicist; extra-curricular interests affected his results, so in 1938 he began an LL.B. Through his membership of the university dramatic society he met Margaret Dovey and it was through her father William Dovey KC that he became a judge’s associate in 1941. Shortly after marrying Margaret in 1942, Gough began training in the RAAF and photo: aah archives served subsequently as a navigator in northern Australia and the Pacific. He completed his law degree after the war hen Gough Whitlam was elected an Honorary as a beneficiary of the Commonwealth Reconstruction WFellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities Training Scheme, acquired a block of land in Cronulla in 1993, he had served terms as Australian Ambassador to with a war service home loan and supplemented his UNESCO and as a member of its executive board; he had income by winning a national quiz competition for two chaired the Council of the National Gallery of Australia successive years.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur A. Calwell's Clashes with the Australian Press, 1943-1945 Colm Kiernan University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Historical Journal Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 4 1976 Arthur A. Calwell's clashes with the Australian Press, 1943-1945 Colm Kiernan University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/hj Recommended Citation Kiernan, Colm, Arthur A. Calwell's clashes with the Australian Press, 1943-1945, University of Wollongong Historical Journal, 2(1), 1976, 74-111. Available at:http://ro.uow.edu.au/hj/vol2/iss1/4 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Arthur A. Calwell's clashes with the Australian Press, 1943-1945 Abstract Arthur Calwell's antagonism to the press was shared by most Australian Labor Party politicians, who explained their setbacks, such as electoral defeats, in terms of opposition from the media, in particular, from the 'capitalist press'. While Arthur Calwell was more bitterly critical than were most others, this was due chiefly ot his ability to express himself, which exceeded that of most of his colleagues. Besides, as Minister for Information, in charge of censorship, he was most likely to provide a target for the press. It would be wrong to explain the conflict, as Alan Reid did, as having been due to his failure to make J.J. Curtin's first Ministry: 'Whatever the newspapers and newspapermen did, they were not going to ignore him, Arthur Calwell, the man who had run the A.L.P. machine in Victoria and told successive State Administrations where they got off'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd/Gillard Government, Asylum Seekers, and the Politics of Norm
    The Rudd/Gillard Government, Asylum Seekers, and the Politics of Norm Contestation Katja Cooper B Arts (International Relations)/B Laws (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Political Science and International Relations (POLSIS) i Abstract This thesis examines the important role that humanitarian arguments played in influencing the trajectory of Australia’s asylum seeker policy during the Prime Ministerships of Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard (2007 – 2013). In the leadup to the 2007 Federal Election, Rudd declared that Australia had a moral obligation to treat asylum seekers with compassion because the ‘biblical injunction to care for the stranger in our midst is clear.’ During his first year in office, Rudd largely fulfilled his promise to comply with the ‘letter and the spirit’ of the Refugee Convention by ending offshore detention on Nauru and Manus Island, abolishing Temporary Protection Visas (TPVs), and declaring that mandatory detention would only be used as a ‘last resort.’ However, by 2013, Labor’s humanitarian platform on Irregular Maritime Arrivals (IMAs) had been largely abandoned. Faced with a significant increase in boat arrivals, an overburdened immigration detention system and an increasingly hostile public, both Rudd and his successor Gillard responded by gradually reintroducing the punitive measures that had comprised the Howard Government’s Pacific Solution. In order to ascertain why Rudd’s attempt to take Australia’s asylum seeker policy in a more humanitarian direction was unable to be sustained, I will undertake a normative analysis of the language that both Labor and the Coalition used in order to legitimate their respective asylum seeker policies during the Rudd/Gillard era.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of the Australian Labor Party
    The transformation of the Australian Labor Party Joint Social Sciences Public Lecture 8 June 2007 Australian National University To what extent does the traditional characterisation of the Australian Labor Party as a reformist, trade union based party operating within the framework of capitalism still apply today? It is important not only to consider the Party’s policies but also mechanisms which link the Labor Party with different classes and social groups: Labor’s electoral support, membership and local branches, the backgrounds of the Party’s parliamentarians and leaders, the role of trade unions and leftwing currents inside the ALP, and its sources of funding. Tom Bramble Rick Kuhn UQ Business School School of Social Science/Arts University of Queensland and Australian National University [email protected] [email protected] The transformation of the Australian Labor Party Tom Bramble and Rick Kuhn During the 1980s and 1990s critics of the contemporary ALP, such as Graham Maddox and Tim Battin, argued that a fundamental break with the Party’s socialist tradition had recently taken place. They focussed particularly on Labor Party policy and actions in government.1 Drawing on Katz, Mair and Blyth’s conceptions of cartel parties, convergent in their policies and reliant on state funding, a recent collection examined the evolution of political parties in Australia.2 Several contributors to Political parties in transition? reproduced aspects of the discontinuity thesis of Maddox and Battin, arguing that Labor can now be described as a cartel party. Their case rested not only on examinations of Labor policy but also on significant shifts in Labor’s electoral support, membership and sources of funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Herbert Vere EVATT QC PC Leader of the Opposition 20 June 1951 to 9 February 1960
    114 Dr. Herbert Vere EVATT QC PC Leader of the Opposition 20 June 1951 to 9 February 1960 Bert Evatt became the 15th Leader of the Opposition after the death of Australian Labor Party leader and former Prime Minister Ben Chifley. Member of the Australian Labor Party 1918–27, 1940-60. Member of the House of Representatives for Barton, NSW 1940- 58, Hunter 1958-60. Minister for External Affairs and Attorney- General 1941-49. Evatt resigned as Leader of the Opposition on 9 February 1960 and was succeeded by Arthur Calwell. As Opposition Leader Vigorously opposed the Menzies government’s attempt to outlaw the Communist Party. Evatt conducted a nation-wide barnstorming campaign in defiance of opinion polls which suggested a large majority in favour of the ban. Evatt’s campaigning contributed to the rejection of the proposed constitutional amendment to ban the party in a national referendum in September 1951. Personally appeared before a royal commission on Soviet espionage after members of his staff were accused of being in contact with the Soviet Embassy in the wake of the ‘Petrov Affair’, in which a senior Soviet diplomat had defected to Australia. Offered to resign as leader in 1955 to persuade the anti-communist Labor members, who had split from the ALP Caucus, to return but was rebuffed. He made a similar offer in 1958 to the Democratic Labor Party in exchange for their second-preference votes and was again turned down. Political life Labor Member for Balmain in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly 1925-27; Independent Labor member 1927-30.
    [Show full text]
  • Annie O'keefe
    NAA: A1501, A429/3 A1501, NAA: In 1942, Indonesian Annie Maas Jacob, her Mrs O’Keefe husband Samuel and their children escaped to Australia as the Japanese military advanced into the Dutch-controlled Aru Islands in the eastern archipelago. The family settled in and the battle for Melbourne and Samuel began work for the Netherlands Indies Forces Intelligence Service, a Dutch intelligence service set up in Australia to monitor the situation in the Dutch East White Australia Indies. In September 1944, he was killed in an air crash when returning to Australia from New Guinea, leaving Annie and the children to an uncertain future. The Dutch Government The case of Annie O’Keefe was a major controversy in granted Annie a pension of £28 a month. Help the election year of 1949. Immigration Minister Arthur Calwell also came from their landlord, a retired postal clerk named John (Jack) O’Keefe. later claimed the case knocked down the central pillar of the With the end of the war, Immigration Minister White Australia Policy. Sean Brawley, a National Archives Arthur Calwell made plans to repatriate Margaret George Award winner for 2006, looks at public the thousands of Asian evacuees who, like the Jacob family, had sought refuge in reaction to Annie O’Keefe and her family. Australia. Reluctant to return to an unsettled 6 NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF AUSTRALIA Indonesia, the Jacob family sought delays The files in the National Archives also The O’Keefe case seemed to show clearly to their repatriation, which the Australian provide an insight into Australian opinion the policy’s racial intent.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Old Parliament House
    A HISTORY OF OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE RESOURCE THE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction . 3 THE BUILDING The building that shaped a nation . 4 Design and construction . 5 The House of Representatives Chamber . 6 The Senate Chamber . 7 King’s Hall . 8 The Cabinet Room . 9 The Gardens . 10 THE EVENTS Old Parliament House opens 1927 . 11 The Second World War 1939-45 . 12 The Federal Election 1949 . 13 The Royal Visit 1954 . 14 The Dismissal 1975 . 15 THE DECISIONS The National Service Act 1964 . 16 The Referendum 1967 . 17 The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 . 18 The World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 . 19 THE PRIME MINISTERS The Prime Ministers of Old Parliament House . .. 20-25 THE WEBSITE moadoph gov. au/learning. @moadlearning @museumofaustraliandemocracy A HISTORY OF OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE — P.2 THE INTRODUCTION A national icon, and a place a nation in its own right . Over the people in it . Produced in a of great beauty, magnificent that time, the building was the fact sheet format with each page design and historical signifi- theatre in which the politics of covering one topic, it can be used cance, Old Parliament House is the day were played out and as information for background home to the Museum of Austra- momentous decisions made . research for a unit on Federal lian Democracy (MoAD) . Parliament and as a starting Today, the importance of the point for further study and dis- As a modern day town square, building lies in its historical and cussion on democracy . we celebrate the Australian social value to the Australian democratic spirit, champion people .
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Calwell and the Origin of Post-War Immigration
    Arthur Calwell and the origin of post-war immigration Zubrzycki, Jerzy Arthur Calwell and the Origin Pacific War it is surely that we cannot continue to of Post-War Immigration Canberra, Bureau of hold our island continent for ourselves and our Immigration, Multicultural and Population descendants unless we greatly increase our numbers. Research, 1995. We are about 7 million people and we hold 3 million square miles of this earth surface ... much This is an edited version of an address given b y development and settlement have yet to be Professor Zubrzycki to the Migration Division undertaken. Our need to undertake it is urgent and Seminar, Department of Immigration and imperative if we are to survive ... Ethnic Affairs, Canberra, on 6 October 1994. He went on to sketch out 'schemes of organised 1. A watershed in Australia's and assisted British migration', but added this history most significant statement: 'The door to Australia will always be open within limits of The year 1995 marks the fiftieth anniversary of our existing legislation to people from the an event which laid the foundation for what various dominions, United States of America Australia has become as a result of the migration and from European continental countries, who and successful settlement of some 5.5 million are sound in health and who will not become a people from over one hundred countries. The charge on the community to come here and radical transformation of Australia's ethnic make their homes'. These last few words composition is something of a record on the indicated that his vision of Australian global scale.
    [Show full text]