DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0801.1933V1 [Hep-Th]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0801.1933V1 [Hep-Th] Critical Review of Path Integral Formulation Takehisa Fujita 1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan Abstract The path integral formulation in quantum mechanics corresponds to the first quantization since it is just to rewrite the quantum mechanical amplitude into many dimensional integrations over discretized coordinates xn. However, the path integral expression cannot be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. Further, the field theory path integral in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields does not correspond to the field quantization. We clarify the essential difference between Feynman’s original formulation of path integral in QED and the modern version of the path integral arXiv:0801.1933v1 [hep-th] 13 Jan 2008 method prevailing in lattice field theory calculations, and show that the former can make a correct second quantization while the latter cannot quantize fields at all and its physical meaning is unknown. 1 Introduction The path integral expression in quantum mechanics can be obtained by rewriting the quantum mechanical amplitude K(x,x′ : t) = x′ e−iHt x into many dimensional h | | i integrations over discretized coordinates xn. This formulation can be related to physical observables and we discuss a good example of harmonic oscillator which can be evaluated analytically. However, one should be careful for the statement that the path integral formulation can be connected to the dynamics of classical mechanics. At a glance, one may feel that the path integral formulation can be written in terms of the Lagrangian of the classical mechanics. However, one can easily convince oneself that the path integral expression cannot be related to the time derivative of the two 1e-mail: ff[email protected] 1 coordinates x and x − since they have to be varied independently from to k k 1 −∞ in the path integral formulation. On the other hand, if it is a time derivative, ∞ then the difference of (x x − ) should be kept sufficiently small within a distance k − k 1 ∆t in this context. The interesting point of the path integral is that, if one starts from the Lagrangian in classical mechanics, then one can quantize the system by the path integral formulation in which one does not have to solve the Schr¨odinger equation, but it has nothing to do with the dynamics of classical mechanics such as the summation of classical paths. Then, we show Feynman’s formulation of the field theory path integral in quan- tum electrodynamics (QED), which is based on many dimensional integrations over the parameters qk,λ appearing in the vector potential. This should be indeed con- nected to the second quantization in field theory models since the procedure is es- sentially based on the path integral formulation in quantum mechanics of parameter space. However, the field theory path integral formulation in most of the textbooks is normally defined in terms of many dimensional integrations over fields. In this case, the path integral method does not correspond to the field quantization. Here, we clarify what should be the problems of the path integral formulation over the field variables and why the integrations over fields do not correspond to the field quantization. 2 Path Integral in Quantum Mechanics The path integral formulation in one dimensional quantum mechanics starts from the amplitude K(x,x′ : t) which is defined by K(x,x′ : t)= x′ e−iHt x (2.1) h | | i where the system is specified by the Hamiltonian H. In the field theory textbooks, one often finds the expression of the amplitude K(x,x′ : t) in terms of the transition between the state x,t and x′,t′ as | i | i ′ x′,t′ x,t x′ e−iH(t −t) x . (2.2) h | i → h | | i However, the state x,t is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian and therefore, one | i cannot prove the rightarrow of eq.(2.2). Instead, we should rewrite the amplitude K(x,x′ : t) so as to understand its physical meaning K(x,x′ : t)= x′ e−iHt x = ψ (x′)ψ† (x)e−iEnt (2.3) h | | i n n n X where ψn(x) and En should be the eigenstate and the eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian H. We note that eq.(2.3) is not yet directly related to physical observables. 2.1 Path Integral Expression We start from the amplitude K(x′,x : t) K(x′,x : t)= x′ e−iHt x h | | i 2 where the Hamiltonian in one dimension is given as pˆ2 1 ∂2 H = + U(x)= + U(x). (2.4) 2m −2m ∂x2 Here, a particle with its mass m is bound in the potential U(x). Now, one can make n partitions of t and x′ x, and therefore we label the discretized coordinate x as − x = x , x , x , , x′ = x . (2.5) 0 1 2 · · · n In this case, we assume that each xi and p should satisfy the following completeness relations ∞ ∞ 1 ipxi dxi xi xi = 1, xi p = e , dp p p = 1, (i = 1, ,n). (2.6) | ih | h | i √2π | ih | · · · Z−∞ Z−∞ Therefore, K(x′,x : t) becomes ∞ ∞ ′ K(x ,x : t)= dx dx − 1 · · · n 1× Z−∞ Z−∞ ′ −iH∆t −iH∆t −iH∆t x e x − x − e x − x e x (2.7) h | | n 1ih n 1| | n 2i···h 1| | i t where ∆t is defined as ∆t = n . Further, one can calculate the matrix elements, for example, as ∆t ∂2 x e−iH∆t x = x exp i + U(x)∆t x h 1| | i h 1| − −2m ∂x2 | i ∆t ∂2 exp( iU(x)∆t) x exp i x + O((∆t)2). (2.8) ≃ − h 1| 2m ∂x2 | i 2 i ∆t ∂ In addition, x e 2m ∂x2 x can be evaluated by inserting a complete set of momen- h 1| | i tum states 2 ∞ 2 m x−x 2 ∆t ∂ dp −i p ∆t −ip(x−x ) m −i ( 1) x exp i x = e 2m e 1 = e 2∆t . (2.9) h 1| 2m ∂x2 | i 2π 2iπ∆t Z−∞ r Therefore, one finds now the path integral expression for K(x′,x : t) m n K(x′,x : t) = lim 2 n→∞ 2iπ∆t × ∞ ∞ n 2 m(xk xk−1) dx1 dxn−1 exp i − U(xk)∆t (2.10a) −∞ · · · −∞ ( 2∆t − ) Z Z Xk=1 ′ where x0 = x and xn = x , respectively. Since the classical action S is given as t n 2 1 2 m xk xk−1 S = dt mx˙ U(x) = lim ∆t − U(xk) (2.11) 0 2 − n→∞ ( 2 ∆t − ) Z Xk=1 3 the amplitude can be symbolically written as t 1 K(x′,x : t)= [ x]exp i mx˙ 2 U(x) dt′ (2.10b) N D 2 − Z Z0 where [ x] is defined as N D n ∞ ∞ R m 2 [ x] lim dx1 dxn−1. N D ≡ n→∞ 2iπ∆t −∞ · · · −∞ Z Z Z This is indeed amazing in that the quantum mechanical amplitude seems to be connected to the Lagrangian of the classical mechanics for a particle with its mass m in the same potential U(x). Since the procedure of obtaining eq.(2.10a) is just to rewrite the amplitude by inserting the complete set of the x states, there is no | ni mathematical problem involved in evaluating eq.(2.10a). 2.2 Physical meaning of path integral However, the physical meaning of the result and the procedure in obtaining eqs.(2.10) is not at all easy to understand. It is clear that eq.(2.10a) is well defined and there is no problem since it simply involves mathematics. However, there is a big jump from eq.(2.10a) to eq.(2.10b), even though it looks straightforward. Eq.(2.10b) indicates that the first term of eq.(2.10b) in the curly bracket is the kinetic energy of the particle in classical mechanics. In this case, however, xk and xk−1 cannot be varied independently as one sees it from classical mechanics since it is related to the time derivative. On the other hand, they must be varied independently in the original version of eq.(2.10a) since it has nothing to do with the time derivative in the process of the evaluation. This is clear since, in quantum mechanics, time and coordinate are independent from each other. Therefore, it is difficult to interpret the first term of eq.(2.10a) as the kinetic energy term in classical mechanics. Secondly, the procedure of rewriting the amplitude is closely connected to the fact that the kinetic energy of p2 the Hamiltonian is quadratic in p, that is, it is described as 2m . In this respect, the fundamental ingredients of the path integral formulation must lie in eq.(2.9) which relates the momentum operator p2 to the time derivative of the coordinate x under the condition that xk and xk−1 are sufficiently close to each other. In this sense, if the kinetic energy operator were linear in p like the Dirac equation, then there is no chance to rewrite the amplitude since the Gaussian integral is crucial in evaluating the integral. Therefore, it should be difficult to claim that eq.(2.10a) can correspond to the dynamics of classical mechanics, even though, superficially, there is some similarity between them. In other words, it is hard to prove that the quantum mechanical expression of K(x′,x : t) is related to any dynamics of classical mechanics. One may say that K(x′,x : t) happens to have a similar shape to classical Lagrangian, mathematically, but, physically it has nothing to do with the dynamics of classical mechanics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Winter 12-15-2016 The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime Li Chen Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Recommended Citation Chen, Li, "The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime" (2016). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 985. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/985 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Physics Dissertation Examination Committee: Alexander Seidel, Chair Zohar Nussinov Michael Ogilvie Xiang Tang Li Yang The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime by Li Chen A dissertation presented to The Graduate School of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 Saint Louis, Missouri c 2016, Li Chen ii Contents List of Figures v Acknowledgements vii Abstract viii 1 Introduction to Quantum Hall Effect 1 1.1 The classical Hall effect . .1 1.2 The integer quantum Hall effect . .3 1.3 The fractional quantum Hall effect . .7 1.4 Theoretical explanations of the fractional quantum Hall effect . .9 1.5 Laughlin's gedanken experiment .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 1 Old Quantum Theory
    UNIT 1 OLD QUANTUM THEORY Structure Introduction Objectives li;,:overy of Sub-atomic Particles Earlier Atom Models Light as clectromagnetic Wave Failures of Classical Physics Black Body Radiation '1 Heat Capacity Variation Photoelectric Effect Atomic Spectra Planck's Quantum Theory, Black Body ~diation. and Heat Capacity Variation Einstein's Theory of Photoelectric Effect Bohr Atom Model Calculation of Radius of Orbits Energy of an Electron in an Orbit Atomic Spectra and Bohr's Theory Critical Analysis of Bohr's Theory Refinements in the Atomic Spectra The61-y Summary Terminal Questions Answers 1.1 INTRODUCTION The ideas of classical mechanics developed by Galileo, Kepler and Newton, when applied to atomic and molecular systems were found to be inadequate. Need was felt for a theory to describe, correlate and predict the behaviour of the sub-atomic particles. The quantum theory, proposed by Max Planck and applied by Einstein and Bohr to explain different aspects of behaviour of matter, is an important milestone in the formulation of the modern concept of atom. In this unit, we will study how black body radiation, heat capacity variation, photoelectric effect and atomic spectra of hydrogen can be explained on the basis of theories proposed by Max Planck, Einstein and Bohr. They based their theories on the postulate that all interactions between matter and radiation occur in terms of definite packets of energy, known as quanta. Their ideas, when extended further, led to the evolution of wave mechanics, which shows the dual nature of matter
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Quantization of Two-Dimensional Gravity S
    Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–16. Translated from Zhurnal Éksperimental’noœ i Teoreticheskoœ Fiziki, Vol. 117, No. 1, 2000, pp. 5–21. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2000 by Vergeles. GRAVITATION, ASTROPHYSICS Canonical Quantization of Two-Dimensional Gravity S. N. Vergeles Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, 142432 Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Received March 23, 1999 Abstract—A canonical quantization of two-dimensional gravity minimally coupled to real scalar and spinor Majorana fields is presented. The physical state space of the theory is completely described and calculations are also made of the average values of the metric tensor relative to states close to the ground state. © 2000 MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”. 1. INTRODUCTION quantization) for observables in the highest orders, will The quantum theory of gravity in four-dimensional serve as a criterion for the correctness of the selected space–time encounters fundamental difficulties which quantization route. have not yet been surmounted. These difficulties can be The progress achieved in the construction of a two- arbitrarily divided into conceptual and computational. dimensional quantum theory of gravity is associated The main conceptual problem is that the Hamiltonian is with two ideas. These ideas will be formulated below a linear combination of first-class constraints. This fact after the necessary notation has been introduced. makes the role of time in gravity unclear. The main computational problem is the nonrenormalizability of We shall postulate that space–time is topologically gravity theory. These difficulties are closely inter- equivalent to a two-dimensional cylinder.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model
    Instituto de Física Teórica IFT Universidade Estadual Paulista October/92 IFT-R043/92 Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model J.C.Brunelli Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405-900 - São Paulo, S.P. Brazil 'This work was supported by CNPq. Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - Sao Paulo, S.P. Brazil Telephone: 55 (11) 288-5643 Telefax: 55(11)36-3449 Telex: 55 (11) 31870 UJMFBR Electronic Address: [email protected] 47553::LIBRARY Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: 1. Introduction Renormalization of the Massive Thimng Model' The stochastic quantization method of Parisi-Wu1 (for a review see Ref. 2) when applied to fermionic theories usually requires the use of a Langevin system modified by the introduction of a kernel3 J. C. Brunelli (1.1a) InBtituto de Física Teórica (1.16) Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - São Paulo - SP where BRAZIL l = 2Kah(x,x )8(t - ?). (1.2) Here tj)1 tp and the Gaussian noises rj, rj are independent Grassmann variables. K(xty) is the aforementioned kernel which ensures the proper equilibrium limit configuration for Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Modern Physics A. mas si ess theories. The specific form of the kernel is quite arbitrary but in what follows, we use K(x,y) = Sn(x-y)(-iX + ™)- Abstract In a number of cases, it has been verified that the stochastic quantization procedure does not bring new anomalies and that the equilibrium limit correctly reproduces the basic (jJsfsini g the Langevin approach for stochastic processes we study the renormalizability properties of the models considered4.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom
    Quantum Theory of the Hydrogen Atom Chemistry 35 Fall 2000 Balmer and the Hydrogen Spectrum n 1885: Johann Balmer, a Swiss schoolteacher, empirically deduced a formula which predicted the wavelengths of emission for Hydrogen: l (in Å) = 3645.6 x n2 for n = 3, 4, 5, 6 n2 -4 •Predicts the wavelengths of the 4 visible emission lines from Hydrogen (which are called the Balmer Series) •Implies that there is some underlying order in the atom that results in this deceptively simple equation. 2 1 The Bohr Atom n 1913: Niels Bohr uses quantum theory to explain the origin of the line spectrum of hydrogen 1. The electron in a hydrogen atom can exist only in discrete orbits 2. The orbits are circular paths about the nucleus at varying radii 3. Each orbit corresponds to a particular energy 4. Orbit energies increase with increasing radii 5. The lowest energy orbit is called the ground state 6. After absorbing energy, the e- jumps to a higher energy orbit (an excited state) 7. When the e- drops down to a lower energy orbit, the energy lost can be given off as a quantum of light 8. The energy of the photon emitted is equal to the difference in energies of the two orbits involved 3 Mohr Bohr n Mathematically, Bohr equated the two forces acting on the orbiting electron: coulombic attraction = centrifugal accelleration 2 2 2 -(Z/4peo)(e /r ) = m(v /r) n Rearranging and making the wild assumption: mvr = n(h/2p) n e- angular momentum can only have certain quantified values in whole multiples of h/2p 4 2 Hydrogen Energy Levels n Based on this model, Bohr arrived at a simple equation to calculate the electron energy levels in hydrogen: 2 En = -RH(1/n ) for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, .
    [Show full text]
  • Vibrational Quantum Number
    Fundamentals in Biophotonics Quantum nature of atoms, molecules – matter Aleksandra Radenovic [email protected] EPFL – Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Bioengineering Institute IBI 26. 03. 2018. Quantum numbers •The four quantum numbers-are discrete sets of integers or half- integers. –n: Principal quantum number-The first describes the electron shell, or energy level, of an atom –ℓ : Orbital angular momentum quantum number-as the angular quantum number or orbital quantum number) describes the subshell, and gives the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum through the relation Ll2 ( 1) –mℓ:Magnetic (azimuthal) quantum number (refers, to the direction of the angular momentum vector. The magnetic quantum number m does not affect the electron's energy, but it does affect the probability cloud)- magnetic quantum number determines the energy shift of an atomic orbital due to an external magnetic field-Zeeman effect -s spin- intrinsic angular momentum Spin "up" and "down" allows two electrons for each set of spatial quantum numbers. The restrictions for the quantum numbers: – n = 1, 2, 3, 4, . – ℓ = 0, 1, 2, 3, . , n − 1 – mℓ = − ℓ, − ℓ + 1, . , 0, 1, . , ℓ − 1, ℓ – –Equivalently: n > 0 The energy levels are: ℓ < n |m | ≤ ℓ ℓ E E 0 n n2 Stern-Gerlach experiment If the particles were classical spinning objects, one would expect the distribution of their spin angular momentum vectors to be random and continuous. Each particle would be deflected by a different amount, producing some density distribution on the detector screen. Instead, the particles passing through the Stern–Gerlach apparatus are deflected either up or down by a specific amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    Utrecht Lecture Notes Masters Program Theoretical Physics September 2006 INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY by B. de Wit Institute for Theoretical Physics Utrecht University Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Path integrals and quantum mechanics 5 3 The classical limit 10 4 Continuous systems 18 5 Field theory 23 6 Correlation functions 36 6.1 Harmonic oscillator correlation functions; operators . 37 6.2 Harmonic oscillator correlation functions; path integrals . 39 6.2.1 Evaluating G0 ............................... 41 6.2.2 The integral over qn ............................ 42 6.2.3 The integrals over q1 and q2 ....................... 43 6.3 Conclusion . 44 7 Euclidean Theory 46 8 Tunneling and instantons 55 8.1 The double-well potential . 57 8.2 The periodic potential . 66 9 Perturbation theory 71 10 More on Feynman diagrams 80 11 Fermionic harmonic oscillator states 87 12 Anticommuting c-numbers 90 13 Phase space with commuting and anticommuting coordinates and quanti- zation 96 14 Path integrals for fermions 108 15 Feynman diagrams for fermions 114 2 16 Regularization and renormalization 117 17 Further reading 127 3 1 Introduction Physical systems that involve an infinite number of degrees of freedom are usually described by some sort of field theory. Almost all systems in nature involve an extremely large number of degrees of freedom. A droplet of water contains of the order of 1026 molecules and while each water molecule can in many applications be described as a point particle, each molecule has itself a complicated structure which reveals itself at molecular length scales. To deal with this large number of degrees of freedom, which for all practical purposes is infinite, we often regard a system as continuous, in spite of the fact that, at certain distance scales, it is discrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3: Particle in a 1D Box
    Lecture 3: Particle in a 1D Box First we will consider a free particle moving in 1D so V (x) = 0. The TDSE now reads ~2 d2ψ(x) = Eψ(x) −2m dx2 which is solved by the function ψ = Aeikx where √2mE k = ± ~ A general solution of this equation is ψ(x) = Aeikx + Be−ikx where A and B are arbitrary constants. It can also be written in terms of sines and cosines as ψ(x) = C sin(kx) + D cos(kx) The constants appearing in the solution are determined by the boundary conditions. For a free particle that can be anywhere, there is no boundary conditions, so k and thus E = ~2k2/2m can take any values. The solution of the form eikx corresponds to a wave travelling in the +x direction and similarly e−ikx corresponds to a wave travelling in the -x direction. These are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator. Since the particle is free, it is equally likely to be anywhere so ψ∗(x)ψ(x) is independent of x. Incidently, it cannot be normalized because the particle can be found anywhere with equal probability. 1 Now, let us confine the particle to a region between x = 0 and x = L. To do this, we choose our interaction potential V (x) as follows V (x) = 0 for 0 x L ≤ ≤ = otherwise ∞ It is always a good idea to plot the potential energy, when it is a function of a single variable, as shown in Fig.1. The TISE is now given by V(x) V=infinity V=0 V=infinity x 0 L ~2 d2ψ(x) + V (x)ψ(x) = Eψ(x) −2m dx2 First consider the region outside the box where V (x) = .
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom
    The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom Quantum Numbers In order to describe the probable location of electrons, they are assigned four numbers called quantum numbers. The quantum numbers of an electron are kind of like the electron’s “address”. No two electrons can be described by the exact same four quantum numbers. This is called The Pauli Exclusion Principle. • Principle quantum number: The principle quantum number describes which orbit the electron is in and therefore how much energy the electron has. - it is symbolized by the letter n. - positive whole numbers are assigned (not including 0): n=1, n=2, n=3 , etc - the higher the number, the further the orbit from the nucleus - the higher the number, the more energy the electron has (this is sort of like Bohr’s energy levels) - the orbits (energy levels) are also called shells • Angular momentum (azimuthal) quantum number: The azimuthal quantum number describes the sublevels (subshells) that occur in each of the levels (shells) described above. - it is symbolized by the letter l - positive whole number values including 0 are assigned: l = 0, l = 1, l = 2, etc. - each number represents the shape of a subshell: l = 0, represents an s subshell l = 1, represents a p subshell l = 2, represents a d subshell l = 3, represents an f subshell - the higher the number, the more complex the shape of the subshell. The picture below shows the shape of the s and p subshells: (notice the electron clouds) • Magnetic quantum number: All of the subshells described above (except s) have more than one orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Droplets in Dipolar Ring-Shaped Bose-Einstein Condensates
    UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF PHYSICS MASTER THESIS Quantum Droplets in Dipolar Ring-shaped Bose-Einstein Condensates Author: Supervisor: Marija Šindik Dr. Antun Balaž September, 2020 UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU FIZICKIˇ FAKULTET MASTER TEZA Kvantne kapljice u dipolnim prstenastim Boze-Ajnštajn kondenzatima Autor: Mentor: Marija Šindik Dr Antun Balaž Septembar, 2020. Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Antun Balaž, for his guidance, patience, useful suggestions and for the time and effort he invested in the making of this thesis. I would also like to thank my family and friends for the emotional support and encouragement. This thesis is written in the Scientific Computing Laboratory, Center for the Study of Complex Systems of the Institute of Physics Belgrade. Numerical simulations were run on the PARADOX supercomputing facility at the Scientific Computing Laboratory of the Institute of Physics Belgrade. iii Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 Chapter 2 – Theoretical description of ultracold Bose gases 3 2.1 Contact interaction..............................4 2.2 The Gross-Pitaevskii equation........................5 2.3 Dipole-dipole interaction...........................8 2.4 Beyond-mean-field approximation......................9 2.5 Quantum droplets............................... 13 Chapter 3 – Numerical methods 15 3.1 Rescaling of the effective GP equation................... 15 3.2 Split-step Crank-Nicolson method...................... 17 3.3 Calculation of the ground state....................... 20 3.4 Calculation of relevant physical quantities................. 21 Chapter 4 – Results 24 4.1 System parameters.............................. 24 4.2 Ground state................................. 25 4.3 Droplet formation............................... 26 4.4 Critical strength of the contact interaction................. 28 4.5 The number of droplets...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quantization
    Chapter 1 Second Quantization 1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quan- tum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator. Let a and a† be two operators acting on an abstract Hilbert space of states, and satisfying the commutation relation a,a† = 1 (1.1) where by “1” we mean the identity operator of this Hilbert space. The operators a and a† are not self-adjoint but are the adjoint of each other. Let α be a state which we will take to be an eigenvector of the Hermitian operators| ia†a with eigenvalue α which is a real number, a†a α = α α (1.2) | i | i Hence, α = α a†a α = a α 2 0 (1.3) h | | i k | ik ≥ where we used the fundamental axiom of Quantum Mechanics that the norm of all states in the physical Hilbert space is positive. As a result, the eigenvalues α of the eigenstates of a†a must be non-negative real numbers. Furthermore, since for all operators A, B and C [AB, C]= A [B, C] + [A, C] B (1.4) we get a†a,a = a (1.5) − † † † a a,a = a (1.6) 1 2 CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION i.e., a and a† are “eigen-operators” of a†a. Hence, a†a a = a a†a 1 (1.7) − † † † † a a a = a a a +1 (1.8) Consequently we find a†a a α = a a†a 1 α = (α 1) a α (1.9) | i − | i − | i Hence the state aα is an eigenstate of a†a with eigenvalue α 1, provided a α = 0.
    [Show full text]