DOCSLIB.ORG

Finite Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finite Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Group Finite Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Group M. A. Greena and J. W. Moffata;b aPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada September 15, 2021 Abstract Renormalization group methods are applied to a scalar field within a finite, nonlocal quantum field theory formulated perturbatively in Euclidean momentum space. It is demonstrated that the triviality problem in scalar field theory, the Higgs boson mass hierarchy problem and the stability of the vacuum do not arise as issues in the theory. The scalar Higgs field has no Landau pole. 1 Introduction An alternative version of the Standard Model (SM), constructed using an ultraviolet finite quantum field theory with nonlocal field operators, was investigated in previous work [1]. In place of Dirac delta-functions, δ(x), the theory uses distributions (x) based on finite width Gaussians. The Poincar´eand gauge invariant model adapts perturbative quantumE field theory (QFT), with a finite renormalization, to yield finite quantum loops. For the weak interactions, SU(2) U(1) is treated as an ab initio broken symmetry group with non- zero masses for the W and Z intermediate× vector bosons and for left and right quarks and leptons. The model guarantees the stability of the vacuum. Two energy scales, ΛM and ΛH , were introduced; the rate of asymptotic vanishing of all coupling strengths at vertices not involving the Higgs boson is controlled by ΛM , while ΛH controls the vanishing of couplings to the Higgs. Experimental tests of the model, using future linear or circular colliders, were proposed. Present observations are consistent with ΛM 10 TeV. ≥ The Higgs boson mass hierarchy problem will be solved if future experiments confirm the prediction ΛH . 1 TeV. In the following, we will investigate the consequences of an application of renormalization group (RG) methods for the perturbative finite renormalizable model. We will concentrate on a nonlocal spin 0 scalar field φ = φH Lagrangian model which is perturbatively formulated in Euclidean momentum space and might describe the Higgs boson field if nonlocality were fundamental. The ultraviolet finite theory resolves the Higgs mass hierarchy problem, the scalar field model triviality problem and removes the Landau pole singularity for the Higgs field. 2 Scalar Field Theory arXiv:2012.04487v2 [physics.gen-ph] 14 Sep 2021 The Lagrangian we consider for a real scalar field φ φH describing the Higgs boson in Euclidean space is ≡ 1 2 2 1 4 H = ( φ φ + m φ ) + λ0φ : (1) L 2 − 0 4! Using the formalism of [3], we assume that the vacuum expectation of the bare field φ vanishes and 1=2 write φ = Z φr, where φr is the renormalized field. Expressed as series expansions in powers of the physical coupling λ, mass m and energy scale ΛH , the field strength renormalization constant Z and the bare parameters m0 and λ0 are given by: 2 Z = 1 + δZ(λ, m; ΛH ); (2) 1 2 2 2 2 Zm0 = m + δm (λ, m; ΛH ); (3) 2 2 Z λ0 = λ + δλ(λ, m; ΛH ): (4) The propagator in Euclidean momentum space is given by i 2(p) i∆H (p) E ; (5) ≡ p2 + m2 where (p) is the entire function: E p2 + m2 (p) = exp 2 : (6) E − 2ΛH Evaluating the one-loop self-energy graph gives a constant shift to the Higgs boson bare self-energy [3]: −2 2 iZ λ 2 m iΣ0 = − 2 m Γ 1; 2 ; (7) − 32π − ΛH where Γ(n; z) is the incomplete gamma function: Z 1 Γ(n; z) = dt tn−1 exp( t) = (n 1)Γ(n 1; z) + zn−1 exp( z): (8) z − − − − Setting n = 0 in (8) gives: 1 Z 1 exp( t) X ( z)n Γ(0; z) = E1(z) = dt − = ln(z) γ − ; (9) t nn! z − − − n=1 exp( z) Γ( 1; z) = Γ(0; z) + − : (10) − − z 2 The renormalized one-loop self-energy ΣR(p ) can then be written in the form: −1 2 2 2 2 2 Z λ 2 m 2 ΣR(p ) = δZ(p + m ) + δm + 2 m Γ 1; 2 + (λ ): (11) 32π − ΛH O The renormalized mass and field strength are given by 2 2 λ 2 m 2 δm = 2 m Γ 1; + (λ ); (12) −32π − ΛH O δZ = (λ2): (13) O The expansion of the one-loop Higgs boson self-energy mass correction for m ΛH is 2 2 2 λ 2 2 ΛH 2 m 2 δm = 2 ΛH + m ln 2 + m (1 γ) + 2 + (λ ): (14) 32π − m − O ΛH O The one-loop vertex correction is given by 3λ2 Z 1=2 1 m2 δλ = dx Γ 0; + (λ3): (15) 16π2 1 x Λ2 O 0 − H For m ΛH this can be expanded for the Higgs boson to give 2 2 2 3λ 1 ΛH 1 m 3 δλ = 2 ln 2 + (ln(2) 1 γ) + 2 + (λ ): (16) 16π 2 m 2 − − O ΛH O 2 3 Callan-Symanzik Equation and Running of λ Let us consider the Callan-Symanzik equations [13, 14, 15, 16] satisfied with our energy (length) scales Λi playing the roles of finite renormalization scales. In finite QFT theory, the equations for the regularized amplitudes Γ(n)(x x0) are − @ @ (n) Λi + β(gi) 2γ(gi) Γ = 0; (17) @Λi @gi − where gi are the running coupling constants associated with diagram vertices. The correlation functions (n) will satisfy this equation for the n-th order Γ for the Gell-Mann-Low functions β(gi) and the anomalous dimensions in nth-loop order. For the Higgs field, the RG equation is given by @ @ H ΛH + β(λ) 2γ(λ) Γ = 0: (18) @ΛH @λ − where the coupling λ runs with ΛH . Neglecting the anomalous dimension term γ(λ) and replacing the measured Higgs mass m by the RG scaling mass µ yields the equation: dλ β(λ) = : (19) − ΛH d ln µ We obtain from (15) the Higgs field β function: 3λ2 β(λ) = I(µ2=Λ2 ) + (λ3); (20) 16π2 H O where Z 1=2 1 µ2 I(µ2=Λ2 ) = dx Γ 0; : (21) H 1 x Λ2 0 − H Using the identities Γ(0; y) = E1(y) = Ei( y), yields: − − Z 1=2 2 2 2 1 µ 1 −2µ2 2µ2 −2µ2 I(µ =ΛH ) = dx Ei 2 = 2 exp Λ2 + 1 + Λ2 Ei Λ2 − −1 x Λ H H H 0 − H −µ2 µ2 −µ2 exp Λ2 1 + Λ2 Ei Λ2 : (22) − H − H H We have λ = λ0 + δλ and dλ dδλ = = β(λ): (23) ΛH ΛH − d µ d ln µ From (20) we obtain dλ 3 = dI(µ2=Λ2 ): (24) λ2 −16π2 H Integrating this equation we get 1 1 2 2 = + J(µ =ΛH ); (25) λ λ0 where Z 2 2 3 dΛH 2 2 J(µ =ΛH ) = 2 I(µ =ΛH ): (26) 16π ΛH 2 2 µ2 Evaluating the integral for J(µ =ΛH ), using x = 2 , gives ΛH 3 J(x) = 2 exp( 2x) + 4 exp( x) + π2 (2 + 4x)Ei( 2x) + (4 + 4x)Ei( x) 128π2 − − − − − − +4x 3F3(1; 1; 1; 2; 2; 2; 2x) 4x 3F3(1; 1; 1; 2; 2; 2; x) − − − ln(2)2 ln(4)γ + 2(γ ln(2)) ln(x) + ln(x)2 ; (27) − − − 3 where pFq(a1; :::; ap; b1; :::; bq; z) is a generalized hypergeometric function. From (25) we obtain: λ0 λ = 2 2 ; (28) 1 + λ0J(µ =ΛH ) or λ λ0 = : (29) 1 λJ(µ2=Λ2 ) − H We can compare (25) with the equation obtained in SM: 1 1 3 ΛC = + 2 ln ; (30) λ λ0 16π µ or λ0 λ = ; (31) 3λ0 ΛC 1 + 16π2 ln µ and λ λ0 = : (32) 3λ ΛC 1 2 ln − 16π µ In the SM, the λφ4 model is renormalizable and produces finite scattering amplitudes and cross sections, but renormalization theory demands that the cutoff ΛC must be taken to infinity, ΛC [5, 6]. Then, from (30), the renormalized coupling constant λ = 0. This is known as the triviality problem! 1 [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. This result holds even in the limit λ0 : ! 1 1 3 Λ ln C : (33) λ ∼ 16π2 µ In the earlier paper [4], it was demonstrated that the triviality problem for the scalar field field could be resolved in the finite QFT theory. Because ΛH = 1=`H is a fundamental constant to be measured, it cannot be taken to infinity as in the case of infinite renormalization theory. Thus, we cannot take the limit `H 0 ! corresponding to the δ-function limit. From Fig. 1, we observe that when we choose ΛH . 1 TeV, the Higgs mass hierarchy problem is resolved, for we have δm2=m2 (1) where m = 125 GeV. From Fig. 1, we 1 ∼ O observe that for ΛH > 2 µ, we avoid a Landau pole and, in particular, for 700 < ΛH < 1 TeV, we resolve the triviality problem for the scalar Higgs field and the Higgs mass fine-tuning hierarchy problem. Choosing an energy µ0 above ΛH as a measurement probe of the running of λ is attempting to make a measurement within the finite Gaussian distribution length size `H [1] and is prohibited within the pertur- bation approximations we have assumed. The results obtained for the running of λ are for a single Higgs particle interacting with another Higgs particle. This cannot describe a fully realistic situation, for the Higgs coupling to other particles such as the top quark (the top quark-Higgs coupling λt (1)) may play an important role. ∼ O The above one-loop calculations have employed a perturbative formulation in Euclidean momentum space and rely on analytic continuation to obtain corresponding Lorentzian results.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • U(1) Symmetry of the Complex Scalar and Scalar Electrodynamics
    Fall 2019: Classical Field Theory (PH6297) U(1) Symmetry of the complex scalar and scalar electrodynamics August 27, 2019 1 Global U(1) symmetry of the complex field theory & associated Noether charge Consider the complex scalar field theory, defined by the action, h i h i I Φ(x); Φy(x) = d4x (@ Φ)y @µΦ − V ΦyΦ : (1) ˆ µ As we have noted earlier complex scalar field theory action Eq. (1) is invariant under multiplication by a constant complex phase factor ei α, Φ ! Φ0 = e−i αΦ; Φy ! Φ0y = ei αΦy: (2) The phase,α is necessarily a real number. Since a complex phase is unitary 1 × 1 matrix i.e. the complex conjugation is also the inverse, y −1 e−i α = e−i α ; such phases are also called U(1) factors (U stands for Unitary matrix and since a number is a 1×1 matrix, U(1) is unitary matrix of size 1 × 1). Since this symmetry transformation does not touch spacetime but only changes the fields, such a symmetry is called an internal symmetry. Also note that since α is a constant i.e. not a function of spacetime, it is a global symmetry (global = same everywhere = independent of spacetime location). Check: Under the U(1) symmetry Eq. (2), the combination ΦyΦ is obviously invariant, 0 Φ0yΦ = ei αΦy e−i αΦ = ΦyΦ: This implies any function of the product ΦyΦ is also invariant. 0 V Φ0yΦ = V ΦyΦ : Note that this is true whether α is a constant or a function of spacetime i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Energy
    Vacuum Energy Mark D. Roberts, 117 Queen’s Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8NS, Email:[email protected] http://cosmology.mth.uct.ac.za/ roberts ∼ February 1, 2008 Eprint: hep-th/0012062 Comments: A comprehensive review of Vacuum Energy, which is an extended version of a poster presented at L¨uderitz (2000). This is not a review of the cosmolog- ical constant per se, but rather vacuum energy in general, my approach to the cosmological constant is not standard. Lots of very small changes and several additions for the second and third versions: constructive feedback still welcome, but the next version will be sometime in coming due to my sporadiac internet access. First Version 153 pages, 368 references. Second Version 161 pages, 399 references. arXiv:hep-th/0012062v3 22 Jul 2001 Third Version 167 pages, 412 references. The 1999 PACS Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/pacslist 11.10.+x, 04.62.+v, 98.80.-k, 03.70.+k; The 2000 Mathematical Classification Scheme: http://www.ams.org/msc 81T20, 83E99, 81Q99, 83F05. 3 KEYPHRASES: Vacuum Energy, Inertial Mass, Principle of Equivalence. 1 Abstract There appears to be three, perhaps related, ways of approaching the nature of vacuum energy. The first is to say that it is just the lowest energy state of a given, usually quantum, system. The second is to equate vacuum energy with the Casimir energy. The third is to note that an energy difference from a complete vacuum might have some long range effect, typically this energy difference is interpreted as the cosmological constant.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Quantum Field Theory on the Plane
    8. Quantum Field Theory on the Plane In this section, we step up a dimension. We will discuss quantum field theories in d =2+1dimensions.Liketheird =1+1dimensionalcounterparts,thesetheories have application in various condensed matter systems. However, they also give us further insight into the kinds of phases that can arise in quantum field theory. 8.1 Electromagnetism in Three Dimensions We start with Maxwell theory in d =2=1.ThegaugefieldisAµ,withµ =0, 1, 2. The corresponding field strength describes a single magnetic field B = F12,andtwo electric fields Ei = F0i.Weworkwiththeusualaction, 1 S = d3x F F µ⌫ + A jµ (8.1) Maxwell − 4e2 µ⌫ µ Z The gauge coupling has dimension [e2]=1.Thisisimportant.ItmeansthatU(1) gauge theories in d =2+1dimensionscoupledtomatterarestronglycoupledinthe infra-red. In this regard, these theories di↵er from electromagnetism in d =3+1. We can start by thinking classically. The Maxwell equations are 1 @ F µ⌫ = j⌫ e2 µ Suppose that we put a test charge Q at the origin. The Maxwell equations reduce to 2A = Qδ2(x) r 0 which has the solution Q r A = log +constant 0 2⇡ r ✓ 0 ◆ for some arbitrary r0. We learn that the potential energy V (r)betweentwocharges, Q and Q,separatedbyadistancer, increases logarithmically − Q2 r V (r)= log +constant (8.2) 2⇡ r ✓ 0 ◆ This is a form of confinement, but it’s an extremely mild form of confinement as the log function grows very slowly. For obvious reasons, it’s usually referred to as log confinement. –384– In the absence of matter, we can look for propagating degrees of freedom of the gauge field itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 234C Lecture Notes
    Physics 234C Lecture Notes Jordan Smolinsky [email protected] Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, ca 92697 Abstract These are lecture notes for Physics 234C: Advanced Elementary Particle Physics as taught by Tim M.P. Tait during the spring quarter of 2015. This is a work in progress, I will try to update it as frequently as possible. Corrections or comments are always welcome at the above email address. 1 Goldstone Bosons Goldstone's Theorem states that there is a massless scalar field for each spontaneously broken generator of a global symmetry. Rather than prove this, we will take it as an axiom but provide a supporting example. Take the Lagrangian given below: N X 1 1 λ 2 L = (@ φ )(@µφ ) + µ2φ φ − (φ φ ) (1) 2 µ i i 2 i i 4 i i i=1 This is a theory of N real scalar fields, each of which interacts with itself by a φ4 coupling. Note that the mass term for each of these fields is tachyonic, it comes with an additional − sign as compared to the usual real scalar field theory we know and love. This is not the most general such theory we could have: we can imagine instead a theory which includes mixing between the φi or has a nondegenerate mass spectrum. These can be accommodated by making the more general replacements X 2 X µ φiφi ! Mijφiφj i i;j (2) X 2 X λ (φiφi) ! Λijklφiφjφkφl i i;j;k;l but this restriction on the potential terms of the Lagrangian endows the theory with a rich structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 215A: Particles and Fields Fall 2016
    Physics 215A: Particles and Fields Fall 2016 Lecturer: McGreevy These lecture notes live here. Please email corrections to mcgreevy at physics dot ucsd dot edu. Last updated: 2017/10/31, 16:42:12 1 Contents 0.1 Introductory remarks............................4 0.2 Conventions.................................6 1 From particles to fields to particles again7 1.1 Quantum sound: Phonons.........................7 1.2 Scalar field theory.............................. 14 1.3 Quantum light: Photons.......................... 19 1.4 Lagrangian field theory........................... 24 1.5 Casimir effect: vacuum energy is real................... 29 1.6 Lessons................................... 33 2 Lorentz invariance and causality 34 2.1 Causality and antiparticles......................... 36 2.2 Propagators, Green's functions, contour integrals............ 40 2.3 Interlude: where is 1-particle quantum mechanics?............ 45 3 Interactions, not too strong 48 3.1 Where does the time dependence go?................... 48 3.2 S-matrix................................... 52 3.3 Time-ordered equals normal-ordered plus contractions.......... 54 3.4 Time-ordered correlation functions.................... 57 3.5 Interlude: old-fashioned perturbation theory............... 67 3.6 From correlation functions to the S matrix................ 69 3.7 From the S-matrix to observable physics................. 78 4 Spinor fields and fermions 85 4.1 More on symmetries in QFT........................ 85 4.2 Representations of the Lorentz group on fields.............. 91 4.3 Spinor lagrangians............................. 96 4.4 Free particle solutions of spinor wave equations............. 103 2 4.5 Quantum spinor fields........................... 106 5 Quantum electrodynamics 111 5.1 Vector fields, quickly............................ 111 5.2 Feynman rules for QED.......................... 115 5.3 QED processes at leading order...................... 120 3 0.1 Introductory remarks Quantum field theory (QFT) is the quantum mechanics of extensive degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Propagator
    Quantum Mechanics_propagator This article is about Quantum field theory. For plant propagation, see Plant propagation. In Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the diagram. They also can be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are therefore often called Green's functions. Non-relativistic propagators In non-relativistic quantum mechanics the propagator gives the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one spatial point at one time to another spatial point at a later time. It is the Green's function (fundamental solution) for the Schrödinger equation. This means that, if a system has Hamiltonian H, then the appropriate propagator is a function satisfying where Hx denotes the Hamiltonian written in terms of the x coordinates, δ(x)denotes the Dirac delta-function, Θ(x) is the Heaviside step function and K(x,t;x',t')is the kernel of the differential operator in question, often referred to as the propagator instead of G in this context, and henceforth in this article. This propagator can also be written as where Û(t,t' ) is the unitary time-evolution operator for the system taking states at time t to states at time t'. The quantum mechanical propagator may also be found by using a path integral, where the boundary conditions of the path integral include q(t)=x, q(t')=x' .
    [Show full text]
  • Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (Course Based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents
    Path Integral in Quantum Field Theory Alexander Belyaev (course based on Lectures by Steven King) Contents 1 Preliminaries 5 1.1 Review of Classical Mechanics of Finite System . 5 1.2 Review of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 7 1.3 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . 14 1.3.1 Relativistic Conventions and Notation . 14 1.3.2 TheKlein-GordonEquation . 15 1.4 ProblemsSet1 ........................... 18 2 The Klein-Gordon Field 19 2.1 Introduction............................. 19 2.2 ClassicalScalarFieldTheory . 20 2.3 QuantumScalarFieldTheory . 28 2.4 ProblemsSet2 ........................... 35 3 Interacting Klein-Gordon Fields 37 3.1 Introduction............................. 37 3.2 PerturbationandScatteringTheory. 37 3.3 TheInteractionHamiltonian. 43 3.4 Example: K π+π− ....................... 45 S → 3.5 Wick’s Theorem, Feynman Propagator, Feynman Diagrams . .. 47 3.6 TheLSZReductionFormula. 52 3.7 ProblemsSet3 ........................... 58 4 Transition Rates and Cross-Sections 61 4.1 TransitionRates .......................... 61 4.2 TheNumberofFinalStates . 63 4.3 Lorentz Invariant Phase Space (LIPS) . 63 4.4 CrossSections............................ 64 4.5 Two-bodyScattering . 65 4.6 DecayRates............................. 66 4.7 OpticalTheorem .......................... 66 4.8 ProblemsSet4 ........................... 68 1 2 CONTENTS 5 Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics 69 5.1 Introduction............................. 69 5.2 The Point to Point Transition Amplitude . 70 5.3 ImaginaryTime........................... 74 5.4 Transition Amplitudes With an External Driving Force . ... 77 5.5 Expectation Values of Heisenberg Position Operators . .... 81 5.6 Appendix .............................. 83 5.6.1 GaussianIntegration . 83 5.6.2 Functionals ......................... 85 5.7 ProblemsSet5 ........................... 87 6 Path Integral Quantisation of the Klein-Gordon Field 89 6.1 Introduction............................. 89 6.2 TheFeynmanPropagator(again) . 91 6.3 Green’s Functions in Free Field Theory .
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem
    The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem S.E. Rugh∗and H. Zinkernagely To appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Abstract - The cosmological constant problem arises at the intersection be- tween general relativity and quantum field theory, and is regarded as a fun- damental problem in modern physics. In this paper we describe the historical and conceptual origin of the cosmological constant problem which is intimately connected to the vacuum concept in quantum field theory. We critically dis- cuss how the problem rests on the notion of physically real vacuum energy, and which relations between general relativity and quantum field theory are assumed in order to make the problem well-defined. 1. Introduction Is empty space really empty? In the quantum field theories (QFT’s) which underlie modern particle physics, the notion of empty space has been replaced with that of a vacuum state, defined to be the ground (lowest energy density) state of a collection of quantum fields. A peculiar and truly quantum mechanical feature of the quantum fields is that they exhibit zero-point fluctuations everywhere in space, even in regions which are otherwise ‘empty’ (i.e. devoid of matter and radiation). These zero-point fluctuations of the quantum fields, as well as other ‘vacuum phenomena’ of quantum field theory, give rise to an enormous vacuum energy density ρvac. As we shall see, this vacuum energy density is believed to act as a contribution to the cosmological constant Λ appearing in Einstein’s field equations from 1917, 1 8πG R g R Λg = T (1) µν − 2 µν − µν c4 µν where Rµν and R refer to the curvature of spacetime, gµν is the metric, Tµν the energy-momentum tensor, G the gravitational constant, and c the speed of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory and Particle Physics
    Quantum Field Theory and Particle Physics Badis Ydri Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences Université d’Annaba Annaba, Algerie 2 YDRI QFT Contents 1 Introduction and References 1 I Path Integrals, Gauge Fields and Renormalization Group 3 2 Path Integral Quantization of Scalar Fields 5 2.1 FeynmanPathIntegral. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 2.2 ScalarFieldTheory............................... 9 2.2.1 PathIntegral .............................. 9 2.2.2 The Free 2 Point Function . 12 − 2.2.3 Lattice Regularization . 13 2.3 TheEffectiveAction .............................. 16 2.3.1 Formalism................................ 16 2.3.2 Perturbation Theory . 20 2.3.3 Analogy with Statistical Mechanics . 22 2.4 The O(N) Model................................ 23 2.4.1 The 2 Point and 4 Point Proper Vertices . 24 − − 2.4.2 Momentum Space Feynman Graphs . 25 2.4.3 Cut-off Regularization . 27 2.4.4 Renormalization at 1 Loop...................... 29 − 2.5 Two-Loop Calculations . 31 2.5.1 The Effective Action at 2 Loop ................... 31 − 2.5.2 The Linear Sigma Model at 2 Loop ................. 32 − 2.5.3 The 2 Loop Renormalization of the 2 Point Proper Vertex . 35 − − 2.5.4 The 2 Loop Renormalization of the 4 Point Proper Vertex . 40 − − 2.6 Renormalized Perturbation Theory . 42 2.7 Effective Potential and Dimensional Regularization . .......... 45 2.8 Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking . 49 2.8.1 Example: The O(N) Model ...................... 49 2.8.2 Glodstone’s Theorem . 55 3 Path Integral Quantization of Dirac and Vector Fields 57 3.1 FreeDiracField ................................ 57 3.1.1 Canonical Quantization . 57 3.1.2 Fermionic Path Integral and Grassmann Numbers . 58 4 YDRI QFT 3.1.3 The Electron Propagator .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2108.04264V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 9 Aug 2021
    Non-equilibrium scalar field dynamics starting from arbitrary initial conditions: Absence of thermalization in one dimensional phonons coupled to fermions Md Mursalin Islam1, ∗ and Rajdeep Sensarma1 1Department of Theoretical Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India. (Dated: August 11, 2021) We propose a new method to study non-equilibrium dynamics of scalar fields starting from non-Gaussian initial conditions using Keldysh field theory. We use it to study dynamics of phonons coupled to bosonic and fermionic baths, starting from initial Fock states. We find that in one dimension long wavelength phonons coupled to fermionic baths do not thermalize both at low and high bath temperatures. At low temperature, constraints from energy-momentum conservation lead to a narrow bandwidth of particle-hole excitations and the phonons effectively do not feel the effects of this bath. On the other hand, the strong band edge divergence of particle-hole density of states leads to an undamped “polariton-like” mode of the dressed phonons above the band edge of the particle-hole excitations. These undamped modes contribute to the lack of thermalization of long wavelength phonons at high temperatures. In higher dimensions, these constraints and the divergence of density of states are weakened and leads to thermalization at all wavelengths. I. INTRODUCTION this problem for Bosons obeying Schrodinger¨ equations. They found that arbitrary initial conditions can be incorporated in the field theory provided an additional source is coupled to Scalar fields are paradigmatic degrees of freedom in quan- the fields at the initial time. The correlators are calculated tum field theories, with wide ranging applications from par- within this theory with the additional source.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Physics and the Standard Model, Part 2
    LectureNotes jiom simple jield theories to the standard model by RichardC. Slansky he standard model of electrowcak and strong interactions determines the form of the interaction bclween panicles. or fields, consists of Iwo relativistic quantum field theories. one to iha[ carry the charge assoclalcd with the symmclry (no~ ncccssarll! describe [he strong interactions and one to describe [he the cleclnc charge). The interaction is mcdia{ed by a spin-l partlclc. T clec!romagnetic and weak interactions, This model. which the vector boson. or gauge parliclc. The second conccpl IS spon - incorporates all Ihe known phcnomenology of these fundamental [ancous symmclr> breaking. where the \acuum ([he slate wilh IIL) ]nterac[ions. descnbcs splnless. spin-lb, and spin-1 fields interacting particles) has a nonzero charge dls[rlbution. In [hc standard model twth onc ano[hcr in a manner delcrmlned by its Lagrangian. The [he nonzcro weak-interaction charge dis~ributton of [he vacuum IS {hcory is rclalivlstically Invariant. so the mathematical form of the the source of most masses of the parliclcs in ~hc theory. These Iwo Lagranglan is unchanged by Lorcntz transformations, basic ideas. local symmetry and spontaneous symmct~ breaking. arc ,411hough rather complicated in detail. the standard model La- exhibited by simple field lhcorws. Wc hcgin [hcsc Icc[urc noms t~llh a grangian IS based on JUSI IWO basic Ideas beyond those necessary for a Lagrangian for scalar tlclds and then. through the cs~cnslcrns and quantum field [hcory. One is the concep! of local symmetry, which is generalizations indicalcd by [hc arrow in the diagram below.
    [Show full text]