DOCSLIB.ORG

Wisconsin Income

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wisconsin Income Due Date Update The due dates for filing and making payments for certain 2020 income tax returns have changed. The due dates in these instructions may not reflect the new due dates. For information on the new filing and payment due dates, see the article 2020 Wisconsin Tax Return Due Dates and Payments. Important Notice for Persons Receiving Unemployment Compensation On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2) was enacted. Section 9042 of the Act allows for an unemployment compensation exclusion of up to $10,200 for federal purposes. Wisconsin has not adopted this federal provision. As a result, taxpayers must add this exclusion to their federal adjusted gross income in effect for Wisconsin on Schedule I. Note: As a result of this addition to federal adjusted gross income for Wisconsin purposes, other Wisconsin computations may be affected. For example, if you claimed the federal earned income tax credit, you must recompute the federal earned income tax credit for Wisconsin purposes before claiming the Wisconsin earned income credit on Form 1. Update to Instructions as a Result of 2021 Wisconsin Act 1 On February 18, 2021, Governor Tony Evers signed 2021 Wisconsin Act 1. The law provides the following changes to the 2020 tax year: Earned Income Tax Credit Wisconsin adopted section 211 of Division EE of Public Law 116-260, allowing taxpayers to elect to use their 2019 earned income to compute their 2020 federal and Wisconsin earned income tax credits. Federal Paycheck Protection Programs Wisconsin adopted sections 276(a) and (b) and 278(a) of Division N of Public Law 116-260, regarding the tax treatment of income and expenses relating to the original and subsequent Paycheck Protection Programs (PPP). Taxpayers may exclude from income the forgiveness of debt on PPP loan proceeds and deduct expenses paid with PPP loan proceeds that are otherwise deductible. Other Federal Grants, Loans, and Subsidies Wisconsin adopted section 278(b), (c), and (d) of Division N of Public Law 116-260, regarding the tax treatment of income and expenses relating to certain federal grants, loans, and subsidies. Taxpayers may exclude from income the following federal grants, forgivable loans, and subsidies, and deduct expenses paid with the funds if the expenses are otherwise deductible: • Section 278(b) - Emergency grants of economic injury disaster loans (EIDL) and targeted EIDL advances • Section 278(c) - Subsidy for certain loan payments • Section 278(d) - Grants for shuttered venue operators Other Federal Provisions Adopted For an inclusive list of federal provisions adopted under 2021 Wisconsin Act 1, see the Internal Revenue Code update articles under the new tax laws section of Wisconsin Tax Bulletin 212, available on the department's website on Monday, February 22, 2021. State Grant Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic The following income is exempt from Wisconsin income and franchise tax: • Income received from the state of Wisconsin with money received from the coronavirus relief fund authorized under 42 USC 801 to be used for any of the following purposes: o Grants to small businesses o Lodging industry grants o A farm support program o Low-income home energy assistance o Broadband expansion o A rental assistance program o Privately owned movie theater grants o Supplemental child care grants o A nonprofit grant program o A food insecurity initiative o A tourism grants program o Ethanol industry assistance o A cultural organization grant program o Wisconsin Eye o Music and performance venue grants • Income received in the form of a grant issued by the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation during and related to the COVID-19 pandemic under the ethnic minority emergency grant program. Income from these programs is included in federal income pursuant to sec. 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, unless an exception applies. For Wisconsin, this income should be excluded from federal adjusted gross income by making a subtraction modification on Schedule SB, Form 1 – Subtractions from Income, line 46, Other subtractions from income using a description similar to "Wisconsin COVID-19 Program Funds." Note: Expenses paid for with these programs and deducted in the computation of federal adjusted gross income are not required to be added back on the Wisconsin return. Itemized Deduction Credit If the $300 above-the-line deduction (sec. 2204 of division A of Public Law 116-136) is claimed on line 10b of federal Form 1040, that amount may not be claimed as an itemized deduction for federal purposes. Wisconsin adopted this federal provision. As a result, the amount may not be claimed as an itemized deduction for purposes of Wisconsin's itemized deduction credit. See page 15 of the Form 1 instructions. 1 Wisconsin Income Tax Form 1 Instructions 2020 WI file is: FREE: file your state tax return at no charge ACCURATE: it does the math for you SECURE: safe and secure website Visit revenue.wi.gov to file your Wisconsin state tax return online for FREE. Click on WI file to get started! NEW IN 2020 Tax Rates Reduced – The tax rate for the first and second tax bracket is reduced from 4% to 3.54% and from 5.21% to 4.65%, respectively. This rate reduction is built into the tax table on pages Tax Returns Are Due: 36-41. Thursday Form 1 Redesigned – The format of Form 1 has changed this year. The addition and subtraction modifications previously listed on Form April 15, 2021 1 have moved to two new schedules: Schedules AD, Additions to Income, and SB, Subtractions from Income. See these new schedules if you are claiming any of these addition or subtraction modifications. College Savings Account – The subtraction for contributions to a Wisconsin state-sponsored college savings account is increased to $3,340 per beneficiary ($1,670 per beneficiary if you are married filing a separate return or a divorced parent). See page 6 of the Need Help With Your Taxes? Schedule SB instructions. You may be eligible for free Tuition and Fee Expenses – The subtraction for tuition and fees tax help. See page 2 for: is decreased to $6,972 per student. The phase-out range has been • Who can get help increased. See page 4 of the Schedule SB instructions. • How to find a location • What to bring with you REMINDERS Para Assistencia Gratuita IRS Adjustments – If the IRS adjusted any of your federal income en Español tax returns, you must notify the department within 180 days of any Ver página 2 adjustment that affects your Wisconsin income tax returns. See page 8. revenue.wi.gov FEDERAL PRIVACY ACT In compliance with federal law, you are hereby notified that the request for your social security number on the Wisconsin income tax return is made under the authority of sec. 71.03(6)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes. The disclosure of this number on your return is mandatory. It will be used for identification purposes throughout the processing, filing and auditing of your return and the issuance of refund checks. I-111 (R. 02-21) 2 Table of Contents Page General Instructions . 3 • Which Form to File . 3 • Who Must File . 3 • Age . 3 • Other Filing Requirements . 3 • Who Should File . 4 • How To Get An Extension Of Time To File . 4 • Filing Your Return . 4 • Questions About Refunds . 6 • Amending Your Return . 6 Special Instructions . 8 Tax Help / Resources . 10 Line Instructions . 11 2020 Standard Deduction Table . 34 2020 Tax Table . 36 2020 Tax Computation Worksheet . 42 Wisconsin School District Number . 43 Index . 44 Servicio en Español Para ayuda gratuita para la declaración de sus impuestos y de el Crédito por Vivienda Familiar, llame al “211” para encontrar un sitio de Asistencia de Voluntarios para Impuestos (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance también conocido como VITA) cerca de usted. Muchos lugares ofrecen servicios en español. Para respuestas a las preguntas sobre impuestos, por favor llame el Depar tamento de Impuestos al (6 08) 26 6 -248 6 para impuestos individuales y al (608) 266-2776 para impuestos de negocios. Oprima el “2” para ayuda en español. Para más información, visite revenue.wi.gov, en el vinculo (link) “En Español” usted encontrará información sobre el Credito por Ingreso de Trabajo, información del Crédito por Vivienda Familiar, y mucho más – todo disponible en español. Free Tax Preparation Available (commonly referred to as VITA or TCE) Need help filing your taxes? Wisconsin residents can have their taxes prepared for free at any IRS sponsored Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) site or at any AARP sponsored Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) site. These two programs have helped millions of individuals across the country in preparing their taxes. Trained volunteers will fill out your tax return. Many sites will even e-file your return. Who can use these services? • Low to moderate income individuals • Individuals with disabilities • Elderly individuals • Individuals who qualify for the homestead credit or the earned income tax credit What should you bring? • W-2 wage and tax statements • Information on other sources of income and any deductions • Photo ID of taxpayer(s) • Social security cards of taxpayer(s) and dependents • If you are claiming a homestead credit, bring a • Both spouses must be present to file a joint return completed rent certificate or a copy of your 2020 property tax bill, a record of any Wisconsin Works (W2) payments received in 2020, and a statement from your physician or the Veteran’s Administration, or a document from the Social Security Administration if disabled and under age 62 VITA and TCE locations: • In Wisconsin, call 1-800-906-9887 • Visit revenue.wi.gov and search “VITA sites” • Call the AARP at 1-888-227-7669 • Call “211” for local free tax sites 3 General Instructions Which Form to File You must file Form 1 if you were a full-year resident of Wisconsin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System
    TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK Key Elements of the U.S. Tax System TAXES AND THE FAMILY What are marriage penalties and bonuses? XXXX Q. What are marriage penalties and bonuses? A. A couple incurs a marriage penalty if the two pay more income tax filing as a married couple than they would pay if they were single and filed as individuals. Conversely, a couple receives a marriage bonus if they pay less tax filing as a couple than they would if they were single. CAUSES OF MARRIAGE BONUSES AND PENALTIES Marriage penalties and bonuses occur because income taxes apply to a couple, not to individual spouses. Under a progressive income tax, a couple’s income can be taxed more or less than that of two single individuals. A couple is not obliged to file a joint tax return, but their alternative—filing separate returns as a married couple—almost always results in higher tax liability. Married couples with children are more likely to incur marriage penalties than couples without children because one or both spouses could use the head of household filing status if they were able to file as singles. And tax provisions that phase in or out with income also produce marriage penalties or bonuses. Marriage penalties are more common when spouses have similar incomes. Marriage bonuses are more common when spouses have disparate incomes. Overall, couples receiving bonuses greatly outnumber those incurring penalties. MARRIAGE PENALTIES Couples in which spouses have similar incomes are more likely to incur marriage penalties than couples in which one spouse earns most of the income, because combining incomes in joint filing can push both spouses into higher tax brackets.
    [Show full text]
  • Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Certificate
    Employee’s Withholding Certificate OMB No. 1545-0074 Form W-4 ▶ (Rev. December 2020) Complete Form W-4 so that your employer can withhold the correct federal income tax from your pay. ▶ Department of the Treasury Give Form W-4 to your employer. 2021 Internal Revenue Service ▶ Your withholding is subject to review by the IRS. Step 1: (a) First name and middle initial Last name (b) Social security number Enter Address ▶ Does your name match the Personal name on your social security card? If not, to ensure you get Information City or town, state, and ZIP code credit for your earnings, contact SSA at 800-772-1213 or go to www.ssa.gov. (c) Single or Married filing separately Married filing jointly or Qualifying widow(er) Head of household (Check only if you’re unmarried and pay more than half the costs of keeping up a home for yourself and a qualifying individual.) Complete Steps 2–4 ONLY if they apply to you; otherwise, skip to Step 5. See page 2 for more information on each step, who can claim exemption from withholding, when to use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App, and privacy. Step 2: Complete this step if you (1) hold more than one job at a time, or (2) are married filing jointly and your spouse Multiple Jobs also works. The correct amount of withholding depends on income earned from all of these jobs. or Spouse Do only one of the following. Works (a) Use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App for most accurate withholding for this step (and Steps 3–4); or (b) Use the Multiple Jobs Worksheet on page 3 and enter the result in Step 4(c) below for roughly accurate withholding; or (c) If there are only two jobs total, you may check this box.
    [Show full text]
  • ITEMIZING on STATE and FEDERAL TAX INCOME RETURNS: IT’S (NOW MORE) COMPLICATED David Weiner December 2, 2020
    ITEMIZING ON STATE AND FEDERAL TAX INCOME RETURNS: IT’S (NOW MORE) COMPLICATED David Weiner December 2, 2020 A taxpayer’s decision to itemize deductions or to claim the standard deduction on their income tax return is often framed as a simple calculation: Claim the greater of the two so as to minimize tax liability. But in states that require taxpayers to use the same status on their state income tax return as on their federal return, this general rule can produce conflicting results if taxpayers examine liability separately on their federal and state returns. Itemized deductions might be greater than the standard deduction on a state income tax return, but the reverse could be true on a federal return. Recent federal law changes have further complicated the choice. When the federal standard deduction was nearly doubled beginning in 2018, many more taxpayers found a conflict between the best itemization scenario on federal and state income tax returns. Those taxpayers must now calculate their federal and state income taxes under both scenarios if they want to minimize their combined state and federal income tax liability. Many taxpayers in states that link federal and state itemization choices are affected. In Maryland, for example, more than 200,000 taxpayers could benefit by itemizing on their federal returns when that may not be the obvious choice. In this brief, I examine the links between federal and state itemization decisions and explore the implications of relaxing state rules requiring that state itemization choices match federal ones. elatively few federal taxpayers itemize deductions on their income tax returns under current law, and those who do tend to have very high incomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: What's Fair About Taxes?
    Hoover Classics : Flat Tax hcflat ch2 Mp_35 rev0 page 35 2. What’s Fair about Taxes? economists and politicians of all persuasions agree on three points. One, the federal income tax is not sim- ple. Two, the federal income tax is too costly. Three, the federal income tax is not fair. However, economists and politicians do not agree on a fourth point: What does fair mean when it comes to taxes? This disagree- ment explains, in large measure, why it so difficult to find a replacement for the federal income tax that meets the other goals of simplicity and low cost. In recent years, the issue of fairness has come to overwhelm the other two standards used to evaluate tax systems: cost (efficiency) and simplicity. Recall the 1992 presidential campaign. Candidate Bill Clinton preached that those who “benefited unfairly” in the 1980s [the Tax Reform Act of 1986 reduced the top tax rate on upper-income taxpayers from 50 percent to 28 percent] should pay their “fair share” in the 1990s. What did he mean by such terms as “benefited unfairly” and should pay their “fair share?” Were the 1985 tax rates fair before they were reduced in 1986? Were the Carter 1980 tax rates even fairer before they were reduced by President Reagan in 1981? Were the Eisenhower tax rates fairer still before President Kennedy initiated their reduction? Were the original rates in the first 1913 federal income tax unfair? Were the high rates that prevailed during World Wars I and II fair? Were Andrew Mellon’s tax Hoover Classics : Flat Tax hcflat ch2 Mp_36 rev0 page 36 36 The Flat Tax rate cuts unfair? Are the higher tax rates President Clin- ton signed into law in 1993 the hallmark of a fair tax system, or do rates have to rise to the Carter or Eisen- hower levels to be fair? No aspect of federal income tax policy has been more controversial, or caused more misery, than alle- gations that some individuals and income groups don’t pay their fair share.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTEC 2018 Pocket Tax Tables
    Pocket Tax Tables Revised through March 1, 2018 SELECTIVE TAX RETURN DUE DATES September 17, 2018 Third estimated installment. October 1, 2018 2017 1041s with 5½ month extension. October 15, 2018 2017 1040s with 6 month extension. January 15, 2019 Fourth estimated installment. April 15, 2019 1040s, fourth estimated installments, calendar year 1041s. May 15, 2019 Form 990. June 17, 2019 Second estimated installment. September 16, 2019 Third estimated installment. October 1, 2019 2018 1041s with 5½ month extension. October 15, 2019 2018 1040s with 6 month extension. January 15, 2020 Fourth estimated installment. POCKET TAX TABLES Revised through March 1, 2018 Although care was taken to make these Pocket Tax Tables an accurate, handy reference, they should not be relied upon as the final basis for action. Neither the College nor the individual editors and advisors (who have volunteered their time and experience in the preparation of the tables) assume any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in the tables. Compiling Editors Susan T. Bart Lawrence P. Katzenstein The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel 901 15th Street, N.W. Suite 525 Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 684-8460 • Fax: (202) 684-8459 Email: [email protected] • Web Page: actec.org © 2018 ACTEC®. All Rights Reserved. ACTEC is a registered trademark of The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel. CONTENTS Item Page Income Tax Married Filing a Joint Return (or surviving spouse) 4 Head of Household 5 Single Individual 6 Married Filing a
    [Show full text]
  • Your Federal Tax Burden Under Current Law and the Fairtax by Ross Korves
    A FairTaxSM White Paper Your federal tax burden under current law and the FairTax by Ross Korves As farmers and ranchers prepare 2006 federal income tax returns or provide income and expense information to accountants and other tax professionals, a logical question is how would the tax burden change under the FairTax? The FairTax would eliminate all individual and corporate income taxes, all payroll taxes and self-employment taxes for Social Security and Medicare, and the estate tax and replace them with a national retail sales tax on final consumption of goods and services. Payroll and self-employment taxes The starting point in calculating the current tax burden is payroll taxes and self-employment taxes. Most people pay more money in payroll and self-employment taxes than they do in income taxes because there are no standard deductions or personal exemptions that apply to payroll and self-employment taxes. You pay tax on the first dollar earned. While employees see only 7.65 percent taken out of their paychecks, the reality is that the entire 15.3 percent payroll tax is part of the cost of having an employee and is a factor in determining how much an employer can afford to pay in wages. Self-employed taxpayers pay both the employer and employee portions of the payroll tax on their earnings, and the entire 15.3 percent on 92.35 percent of their self-employed income (they do not pay on the 7.65 percent of wages that employees do not receive as income); however, they are allowed to deduct the employer share of payroll taxes against the income tax.
    [Show full text]
  • A Macroeconomic Analysis of the Fairtax Proposal Arduin, Laffer & Moore Econometrics
    A MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE FAIRTAX PROPOSAL July 2006 www.arduinlaffermoore.com ©2006 Arduin, Laffer & Moore Econometrics. All rights reserved. No portion of this report may be reproduced in any form without prior consent. The information has been compiled from sources we believe to be reliable, but we do not hold ourselves responsible for its correctness. Opinions are presented without guarantee. A Macroeconomic Analysis of the FairTax Proposal Arduin, Laffer & Moore Econometrics A MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE FAIRTAX PROPOSAL Incentives drive all economic behavior. Taxes are a negative incentive. People do not work, invest, or engage in entrepreneurial activities in order to pay taxes. They engage in such economic activities in order to earn after-tax income. When the government increases its share of the income earned by its citizens, the incentive to engage in growth-enhancing economic activities falls; alternatively, the disincentive to these activities rises. The higher the tax on the next dollar earned (the marginal tax rate) the larger the disincentive. However, without taxes the government cannot operate. From an economic efficiency perspective, the appropriate goal for tax policy is to establish a tax system that minimizes the tax disincentives on economic activities, given the revenue needs of the government.1 Costs of the Current Tax System Based on this criterion, the current tax code is an abysmal failure. First, the compliance costs are too large. Studies estimate the costs of compliance with the current tax system to be around $200 billion annually.2 And, compliance costs are only one of the current system’s difficulties. More importantly, decisions to invest, save, and consume are all distorted due to the complexity, numerous loopholes, exemptions, and social engineering prevalent throughout our current tax code.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Instructions for Form 6251
    Note: The draft you are looking for begins on the next page. Caution: DRAFT—NOT FOR FILING This is an early release draft of an IRS tax form, instructions, or publication, which the IRS is providing for your information. Do not file draft forms and do not rely on draft forms, instructions, and publications for filing. We do not release draft forms until we believe we have incorporated all changes (except when explicitly stated on this coversheet). However, unexpected issues occasionally arise, or legislation is passed—in this case, we will post a new draft of the form to alert users that changes were made to the previously posted draft. Thus, there are never any changes to the last posted draft of a form and the final revision of the form. Forms and instructions generally are subject to OMB approval before they can be officially released, so we post only drafts of them until they are approved. Drafts of instructions and publications usually have some changes before their final release. Early release drafts are at IRS.gov/DraftForms and remain there after the final release is posted at IRS.gov/LatestForms. All information about all forms, instructions, and pubs is at IRS.gov/Forms. Almost every form and publication has a page on IRS.gov with a friendly shortcut. For example, the Form 1040 page is at IRS.gov/Form1040; the Pub. 501 page is at IRS.gov/Pub501; the Form W-4 page is at IRS.gov/W4; and the Schedule A (Form 1040/SR) page is at IRS.gov/ScheduleA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viability of the Fair Tax
    The Fair Tax 1 Running head: THE FAIR TAX The Viability of The Fair Tax Jonathan Clark A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Fall 2008 The Fair Tax 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Gene Sullivan, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Donald Fowler, Th.D. Committee Member ______________________________ JoAnn Gilmore, M.B.A. Committee Member ______________________________ James Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date The Fair Tax 3 Abstract This thesis begins by investigating the current system of federal taxation in the United States and examining the flaws within the system. It will then deal with a proposal put forth to reform the current tax system, namely the Fair Tax. The Fair Tax will be examined in great depth and all aspects of it will be explained. The objective of this paper is to determine if the Fair Tax is a viable solution for fundamental tax reform in America. Both advantages and disadvantages of the Fair Tax will objectively be pointed out and an educated opinion will be given regarding its feasibility. The Fair Tax 4 The Viability of the Fair Tax In 1986 the United States federal tax code was changed dramatically in hopes of simplifying the previous tax code. Since that time the code has undergone various changes that now leave Americans with over 60,000 pages of tax code, rules, and rulings that even the most adept tax professionals do not understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Reform Options: Marginal Rates on High-Income Taxpayers, Capital Gains, and Dividends
    Embargoed Until 10am September 14, 2011 Statement of Leonard E. Burman Daniel Patrick Moynihan Professor of Public Affairs Maxwell School Syracuse University Before the Senate Committee on Finance Tax Reform Options: Marginal Rates on High-Income Taxpayers, Capital Gains, and Dividends September 14, 2011 Chairman Baucus, Ranking Member Hatch, Members of the Committee. Thank you for inviting me to testify on tax reform options affecting high-income taxpayers. I applaud the committee for devoting much of the past year to examining ways to make the tax code simpler, fairer, and more conducive to economic growth, and I’m honored to be asked to contribute to those deliberations. In summary, here are my main points: Economic theory suggests that the degree of progressivity should balance the gains from mitigating economic inequality and risk-sharing against the costs in terms of disincentives created by higher tax rates. The optimal top tax rate depends on social norms and the government’s revenue needs. Experience and a range of empirical evidence suggests that the rates in effect in the 1990s would not unduly diminish economic growth. However, a more efficient option would be to broaden the base (reform or eliminate tax expenditures and eliminate loopholes) to achieve distributional goals while keeping top rates relatively low. The biggest loophole is the lower tax rate on capital gains. Several bipartisan tax reform plans, including the Bipartisan Policy Center plan that I contributed to, would tax capital gains at the same rate as other income. Combined with a substantial reduction in tax expenditures, this allows for a cut in top income rates while maintaining the progressivity of the tax system.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice 21-02 Changes to Deductions for Individuals
    Policy and Research 109 SW 9th Street Phone: 785-368-8222 PO Box 3506 Fax: 785-296-1279 Topeka KS 66601-3506 www.ksrevenue.org Mark A. Burghart, Secretary Laura Kelly, Governor NOTICE 21-02 CHANGES TO DEDUCTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS (JULY 29, 2021) Standard Deduction During the 2021 Legislative Session Senate Bill 50 was passed and signed into law. This Bill amended K.S.A. 79-32,119 to change the standard deduction for individuals filing Kansas income tax returns. Specifically, Section 9 of the Bill includes new statutory language, found in subsection (c)(2), which provides: (2) For tax year 2021, and all tax years thereafter, the standard deduction amount of an individual, including husband and wife who are either both residents or who file a joint return as if both were residents, shall be as follows: Single individual filing status, $3,500; married filing status, $8,000; and head of household filing status, $6,000. In accordance with the new law, for tax years 2021, and all subsequent tax years, the base standard deduction will be: $3,500 for single filing status; $8,000 for married filing joint status; $4,000 for married filing separate status; and $6,000 for head of household filing status. Itemized Deductions Senate Bill 50 also amended K.S.A. 79-32,120 to expand the ability to claim itemized deductions for individuals filing Kansas income tax returns. Specifically, Section 10 of the Bill includes new statutory language, found in subsection (a)(1)(B), which provides: (B) For tax year 2021, and all tax years thereafter, an individual may elect to deduct the Kansas itemized deduction in lieu of the Kansas standard deduction, regardless of whether or not such individual’s federal taxable income is determined by itemizing deductions from such individual’s federal adjusted gross income.
    [Show full text]
  • How Marriage Penalties Change Under the 2001 Tax Bill
    How Marriage Penalties Change under the 2001 Tax Bill Adam Carasso and C. Eugene Steuerle* *Adam Carasso is a research associate and C. Eugene Steuerle is a senior fellow at the Urban Institute. This paper could not have been written without support from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the George Gund Foundation. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Urban Institute, its board, or its funders. 1 Abstract This paper examines how the various provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) change marriage penalties and subsidies for different, hypothetical pairings of heads of household with single workers filing a joint return. Heads of household are assumed to have two children—both eligible for the earned income tax credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit—and the analysis is conducted for families with total adjusted gross incomes (AGI) of up to $80,000, with special attention to those families with combined AGI of $35,000 or less who often face marriage penalties from expenditure programs. Additionally, our simulations take place in 2010 when all provisions of EGTRRA will be fully implemented, although we present our results in real 2001 dollars. Our research focus was to examine the additional marriage penalties that heads of household face in the way of loss of valuable tax benefits for which two single, childless taxpayers who marry would not be eligible. We modeled the impact of six pertinent provisions from the tax bill: the refundable, doubled child credit, the new 10 percent tax bracket, the newly expanded EITC for married couples, the new standard deduction for married couples, the new 15 percent tax bracket for married couples, and the new 25 percent tax bracket.
    [Show full text]