DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Michigan University Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Michigan University Library CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL. 23, NO.8, p. 105-169 (2 pls., 10 text-figs.) FEBRUARY22, 1971 EVOLUTION OF THE FERN FAMILY OSMUNDACEAE BASED ON ANATOMICAL STUDIES BY CHARLES N. MILLER, JR. Department of Botany, University of Montana, Missoula 59801 MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Director: ROBERTV. KESLING The series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for the publication of papers based chiefly upon the collection in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate papers may also be obtained. Correspondence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104. VOLS.2-22. Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. Price lists available upon inquiry. 1. The rodents from the Hagerman local fauna, Upper Pliocene of Idaho, by Richard J. Zakrzewski. Pages 1-36, with 13 text-figures. 2. A new brittle-star from the Middle Devonian Arkona Shale of Ontario, by Robert V. Kesling. Pages 37-51, with 6 plates and 2 text-figures. 3. Phyllocarid crustaceans from the Middle Devonian Silica Shale of northwestern Ohio and southeastern Michigan, by Erwin C. Stumm and Ruth B. Chilman. Pages 53-71, with 7 plates and 4 text-figures. 4. Drepanarter wrighti, a new species of brittle-star from the Middle Devonian Arkona Shale of Ontario, by Robert V. Kesling. Pages 73-79, with 2 plates. 5. Corals of the Traverse Group- of Michigan. Part 13, Hexagonaria, by Erwin C. Stumm. Pages 81-91; with 4 plates. 6. The Pliocene rodent Microtoscoptes disjunctus (Wilson) from Idaho and Wyoming, by Claude W. Hibbard. Pages 95-98, with 2 text-figures. 7. A new microtine rodent from the Upper Pliocene of Kansas, by Claude W. Hibbard. Pages 99-103, with 1 plate and 1 text-figure. EVOLUTION OF THE FERN FAMILY OSMUNDACEAE BASED ON ANATOMICAL STUDIES CHARLES N. MILLER, JR. Department of Botany, University of Montana, Missoula 59801 ABSTRACT-The fern family Osmundaceae has only 16 living species, but nearly 100 fossil species have been named on the basis of various detached organs. Most important of these are 29 species based on petrified axes which provide a partial but substantial record of the family from the Late Permian to the present. These axes and some of the Recent species have been important in the formulation of concepts of stelar evolution and in our understanding of the evolutionary relationships of living ferns, but an intensive investigation of the evolution of the species of the Osmundaceae has never been made. Thus, the purpose of the present work is to investigate the phylogenetic interrelationships of the species of the family as interpreted from anatomical and morphological characters of their stems, leaf-bases, and roots. Types or representative materials of 14 Recent and 21 fossil species were examined for variable characters. Information about nine additional species of petrified axes came from descriptions in the literature. These species were then analyzed by the ground plan method of multiple character correlation in three samples: (1) analysis of 43 species based on six characters, (2) analysis of 31 species based on 13 characters, and (3) analysis of 14 Recent species based on 18 characters. By this means the species were arranged according to lines of specialization, and when these lines are considered with respect to geologic time, nine groups of phylogenetically related species are resolved. Five of the groups are represented by the present-day genera and subgenera and their fossil members. Three groups are subdivisions of Osmundacaulis, and the remaining group includes the extinct protostelic forms. The results show large gaps between these groups. This indicates that the fossil record of the family contains only a small number of those species that existed in the past. It is evident, however, that the modern species evolved from protostelic ancestors by intrastelar origin of a pith and subsequent (or concurrent) dissection of the xylem cylinder by leaf-gaps. The living species and most of the fossil forms are products of slight modifications of the dictyoxylic-siphonostele plan of organization. However, two of the groups of species became highly specialized in the Mesozoic but died out near the close of that era. The Recent genera Todea and Leptopteris are as distinct from one another as each is from the subgenera Osmun- da, Osmundastrum, or Plenasium, but their fossil records are not sufficient to indicate their origin. Osmunda, Osmundastrum, and Plenasium were distinct lines of evolution in the Paleo- cene, and Osmunda and Plenasium are represented by foliage remains in the Cretaceous. No definite source for Osmunda and Osmundastrum can be determined, but Plenasium shares a number of characters with Osmundacaulis atherstonei and 0. natalensis, both of which are from the Lower Cretaceous, and they may have evolved from forms similar to these species. The Osmundaceae probably arose during Early Permian or Pennsylvanian time from forms similar to Grammatopteris baldaufi or G. rigolloti, but neither of these species can be considered a precursor of the family. Further, no ancestors of other fern taxa can be found amonq the known Osmundaceae. Taxonomically, the protostelic forms are treated in the subfamily Thamnopteroideae with the remaining species forming the subfamily Osmundoideae. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................. 107 Acknowledgments. ...................................................................................................................................................................107 Classlficatlon ............................................................................................................................................................................. 108 History of investigation ....................................................................................................................................................... 110 Materials and methods ........................................................................................................................................................... 111 Anatomy and morphology. -. ................................................................................................................................................... 112 Stem .................................................................................................................................................................................. 112 Stele ........................................................................................................................................................................... 112 Cortex ......................................................................................................................................................................... 118 Leaf-trace ................................................................................................................................................................. 119 Petiole base ....................................................................................................................................................................... 122 Root .................................................................................................................................................................................. 124 Stem branching ............................................................................................................................................................... 124 Growth habit ................................................................................................................................................................... 125 106 CHARLES N . MILLER. JR . Systematic descriptions based on stem. root. and leaf-base characters ...................................................................... 125 Order Filicales ........................................................................................................................................................................ 125 Family Osmundaceae ............................................................................................................................................................ 125 Key to the subdivisions based on anatomical characters ........................................................................................ 125 Subfamily Osmundoideae ....................................................................................................................................................... 127 Genus Osmunda ............................................................................................................................................................... 127 Subgenus Osmunda ......................................................................................................................................................... 127 0. regalis. ..................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hybrids in the Fern Genus Osmunda (Osmundaceae)
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 35(2), pp. 63–69, June 22, 2009 Hybrids in the Fern Genus Osmunda (Osmundaceae) Masahiro Kato Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4–1–1, Tsukuba, 305–0005 Japan E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract Four described putative hybrids in genus Osmunda, O. intermedia from Japan, O. rug- gii from eastern U.S.A., O. nipponica from central Japan, and O. mildei from southern China, are enumerated with notes on their hybridity. It is suggested that Osmunda intermedia is an intrasub- generic hybrid (O. japonica of subgenus Osmunda ϫ O. lancea of subgenus Osmunda), O. ruggii is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. regalis of subgenus Osmunda ϫ O. claytoniana of subgenus Clay- tosmunda), O. nipponica is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. japonica ϫ O. claytoniana of subgenus Claytosmunda), and O. midlei is an intersubgeneric hybrid (O. japonica ϫ O. angustifolia or O. vachellii of subgenus Plenasium). Among the four, O. intermedia is the most widely distributed and can reproduce in culture, suggesting that it can reproduce to some extent in nature. Key words : Hybrid, Osmunda intermedia, Osmunda mildei, Osmunda nipponica, Osmunda rug- gii. three subgenera Claytosmunda, Osmunda, and Introduction Plenasium, genus Leptopteris, genus Todea, and The genus Osmunda has been classified in ei- genus Osmundastrum (see also Metzgar et al., ther the broad or narrow sense. In the previously 2008). most accepted and the most lumping classifica- Four putative hybrids are known in the genus tion, it was divided into three subgenera, Osmun- Osmunda s.l. in eastern U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nzbotsoc No 86 Dec 2006
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 86 DECEMBER 2006 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2006 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2006 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the March 2007 issue is 25 February 2007 Please post contributions to: Melanie Newfield 17 Homebush Rd Khandallah Wellington Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word (Word XP or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2010 Hardy Fern Foundation Quarterly Ferns to Our Collection There
    THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION P.O. Box 3797 Federal Way, WA 98063-3797 Web site: www.hardyfems.org The Hardy Fern Foundation was founded in 1989 to establish a comprehen¬ sive collection of the world’s hardy ferns for display, testing, evaluation, public education and introduction to the gardening and horticultural community. Many rare and unusual species, hybrids and varieties are being propagated from spores and tested in selected environments for their different degrees of hardiness and ornamental garden value. The primary fern display and test garden is located at, and in conjunction with, The Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden at the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters, in Federal Way, Washington. Satellite fern gardens are at the Birmingham Botanical Gardens, Birmingham, Alabama, California State University at Sacramento, California, Coastal Maine Botanical Garden, Boothbay , Maine. Dallas Arboretum, Dallas, Texas, Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, Colorado, Georgeson Botanical Garden, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Harry R Leu Garden, Orlando, Florida, Inniswood Metro Gardens, Columbus, Ohio, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, and Strybing Arboretum, San Francisco, California. The fern display gardens are at Bainbridge Island Library. Bainbridge Island, WA, Bellevue Botanical Garden, Bellevue, WA, Lakewold, Tacoma, Washington, Lotusland, Santa Barbara, California, Les Jardins de Metis, Quebec, Canada, Rotary Gardens, Janesville, Wl, and Whitehall Historic Home and Garden, Louisville, KY. Hardy Fern Foundation members participate in a spore exchange, receive a quarterly newsletter and have first access to ferns as they are ready for distribution. Cover design by Willanna Bradner HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY THE HARDY FERN FOUNDATION QUARTERLY Volume 20 No. 3 Editor- Sue Olsen ISSN 154-5517 T7 a -On I »§ jg 3$.as a 1 & bJLsiSLslSi ^ ~~}.J j'.fc President’s Message Patrick Kennar Osmundastrum reinstated, for Osmunda cinnamomea, Cinnamon fern Alan R.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification, Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Time, And
    The JapaneseSocietyJapanese Society for Plant Systematics ISSN 1346-7565 Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56 (2): 111-126 (2005) Invited article and Classification,MolecularPhylogeny,DivergenceTime, Morphological Evolution of Pteridophytes with Notes on Heterospory and and Monophyletic ParaphyleticGroups MASAHIRO KATO* Department ofBiotogicat Sciences,Graduate Schoot ofScience,Universitv. of7bkyo, Hongo, 7bk)]o IJ3- O033, lapan Pteridophytes are free-sporing vascular land plants that evolutionarily link bryophytes and seed plants. Conventiona], group (taxon)-based hierarchic classifications ofptcridophytes using phenetic characters are briefiy reviewcd. Review is also made for recent trcc-based cladistic analyses and molecular phy- logenetic analyses with increasingly large data sets ofmultiplc genes (compared to single genes in pre- vious studies) and increasingly large numbers of spccies representing major groups of pteridophytes (compared to particular groups in previous studies), and it is cxtended to most recent analyses of esti- mating divergcnce times ofpteridephytes, These c]assifications, phylogenetics, and divergcncc time esti- mates have improved our understanding of the diversity and historical structure of pteridophytes. Heterospory is noted with referencc to its origins, endospory, fertilization, and dispersal. Finally, menophylctic and paraphyletic groups rccently proposed or re-recognized are briefly dcscribcd. Key words: classification, divergence timc estimate. fems,heterospory, molecular phylogcny, pteri- dophytcs. Morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Polypodiophyta): a Global Assessment of Traits Associated with Invasiveness and Their Distribution and Status in South Africa
    Terrestrial alien ferns (Polypodiophyta): A global assessment of traits associated with invasiveness and their distribution and status in South Africa By Emily Joy Jones Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Faculty of Science at the Nelson Mandela University April 2019 Supervisor: Dr Tineke Kraaij Co-Supervisor: Dr Desika Moodley Declaration I, Emily Joy Jones (216016479), hereby indicate that the dissertation for Master of Science in the Faculty of Science is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment or completion of any postgraduate qualification to another University or for another qualification. _______________________ 2019-03-11 Emily Joy Jones DATE Official use: In accordance with Rule G4.6.3, 4.6.3 A treatise/dissertation/thesis must be accompanied by a written declaration on the part of the candidate to the effect that it is his/her own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University or for another qualification. However, material from publications by the candidate may be embodied in a treatise/dissertation/thesis. i Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Not 100% – but Four Steps Closer to Sustainable Tourism
    C.12 Not 100% – but four steps closer to sustainable tourism February 2021 This report has been produced pursuant to subsections 16(1)(a) to (c) of the Environment Act 1986. The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is an independent Officer of Parliament, with functions and powers set out in the Environment Act 1986. His role allows an opportunity to provide Members of Parliament with independent advice in their consideration of matters that may have impacts on the environment. This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment are available at pce.parliament.nz. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Te Kaitiaki Taiao a Te Whare Pāremata PO Box 10-241 Wellington 6143 Aotearoa New Zealand T 64 4 471 1669 F 64 4 495 8350 E [email protected] W pce.parliament.nz February 2021 ISBN 978-0-947517-24-3 (print) 978-0-947517-25-0 (electronic) Photography Cover images: Hot Water Beach, Eli Duke, Flickr; Akaroa, Bruno d’Auria, Flickr; contrails, Andreina Schoeberlein, Flickr. Chapter header images: Leptopteris superba, John Barkla, iNaturalist; Cyathea dealbata, Hymenophyllum demissum, Paul Bell-Butler, iNaturalist; Anogramma leptophylla, Schizaea australis, Pteris macilenta, Sarah Richardson, iNaturalist; Notogrammitis billardierei, Chris Ecroyd, iNaturalist. Not 100% – but four steps closer to sustainable tourism February 2021 Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is indebted to a number of people who assisted him in conducting this investigation. Special thanks are due to Andrew McCarthy who led the project, supported by Leana Barriball, Dr Robert Dykes, Tessa Evans, Vivienne Holm, Shaun Killerby, Peter Lee and Megan Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • Fern Classification
    16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paraphyly of Osmunda Is Confirmed by Phylogenetic Analyses of Seven Plastid Loci
    Systematic Botany (2008), 33(1): pp. 31–36 © Copyright 2008 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists The Paraphyly of Osmunda is Confirmed by Phylogenetic Analyses of Seven Plastid Loci Jordan S. Metzgar,1 Judith E. Skog,2,3 Elizabeth A. Zimmer,4 and Kathleen M. Pryer1,5 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 U.S.A. 2Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030 U.S.A. 3National Science Foundation, Division of Biological Infrastructure, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22203 U.S.A. 4Department of Botany and Laboratory of Analytical Biology, Smithsonian Museum Support Center, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746 U.S.A. 5Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Communicating Editor: Daniel Potter Abstract—To resolve phylogenetic relationships among all genera and subgenera in Osmundaceae, we analyzed over 8,500 characters of DNA sequence data from seven plastid loci (atpA, rbcL, rbcL–accD, rbcL–atpB, rps4–trnS, trnG–trnR, and trnL–trnF). Our results confirm those from earlier anatomical and single-gene (rbcL) studies that suggested Osmunda s.l. is paraphyletic. Osmunda cinnamomea is sister to the remainder of Osmundaceae (Leptopteris, Todea, and Osmunda s.s.). We support the recognition of a monotypic fourth genus, Osmundastrum, to reflect these results. We also resolve subgeneric relationships within Osmunda s.s. and find that subg. Claytosmunda is strongly supported as sister to the rest of Osmunda. A stable, well-supported classification for extant Osmundaceae is proposed, along with a key to all genera and subgenera. Keywords—ferns, Osmunda, Osmundaceae, Osmundastrum, paraphyly, plastid DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Osmunda Pulchella Sp. Nov. from the Jurassic of Sweden
    Bomfleur et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:126 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0400-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Osmunda pulchella sp. nov. from the Jurassic of Sweden—reconciling molecular and fossil evidence in the phylogeny of modern royal ferns (Osmundaceae) Benjamin Bomfleur1*, Guido W. Grimm1,2 and Stephen McLoughlin1 Abstract Background: The classification of royal ferns (Osmundaceae) has long remained controversial. Recent molecular phylogenies indicate that Osmunda is paraphyletic and needs to be separated into Osmundastrum and Osmunda s.str. Here, however, we describe an exquisitely preserved Jurassic Osmunda rhizome (O. pulchella sp. nov.) that combines diagnostic features of both Osmundastrum and Osmunda, calling molecular evidence for paraphyly into question. We assembled a new morphological matrix based on rhizome anatomy, and used network analyses to establish phylogenetic relationships between fossil and extant members of modern Osmundaceae. We re-analysed the original molecular data to evaluate root-placement support. Finally, we integrated morphological and molecular data-sets using the evolutionary placement algorithm. Results: Osmunda pulchella and five additional Jurassic rhizome species show anatomical character suites intermediate between Osmundastrum and Osmunda. Molecular evidence for paraphyly is ambiguous: a previously unrecognized signal from spacer sequences favours an alternative root placement that would resolve Osmunda s.l. as monophyletic. Our evolutionary placement analysis identifies fossil species as probable ancestral members of modern genera and subgenera, which accords with recent evidence from Bayesian dating. Conclusions: Osmunda pulchella is likely a precursor of the Osmundastrum lineage. The recently proposed root placement in Osmundaceae—based solely on molecular data—stems from possibly misinformative outgroup signals in rbcL and atpA genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fern Gazette
    FERN GAZ. 17(5): 279-286. 2006 279 FILICALEAN FERNS FROM THE TERTIARY OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: OSMUNDA L. (OSMUNDACEAE : PTERIDOPHYTA), WOODWARDIA SM. (BLECHNACEAE : PTERIDOPHYTA) AND ONOCLEOID FORMS (FILICALES : PTERIDOPHYTA) K.B. PIGG1, M.L. DEVORE2 & W.C. WEHR3† 1School of Life Sciences, PO Box 874501, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA; 2Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, 135 Herty Hall, Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA; 3Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, PO Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195-3010, USA †deceased, 12 April, 2004 Key words: Blechnaceae, fossil fern, Osmunda, Osmundaceae, Tertiary, wessiea, woodwardia ABSTRACT Recently discovered frond remains assignable to Osmunda wehrii Miller (Osmundaceae), as well as several new records of woodwardia (Blechnaceae), and a new onocleoid fern are reported from the Tertiary of western North America. Pinnule morphology of O. wehrii supports the inclusion of this species in Osmunda subgenus Osmunda, as originally proposed by Miller and suggests a close affinity to O. regalis L. and O. japonica Thunb. New occurrences of the woodwardia aerolata clade are noted for the Late Paleocene of western North Dakota and of a highly reticulate-veined form from the Miocene of western Washington. Re-evaluation of specimens of w. deflexipinna H. Smith (Succor Creek, Miocene) confirms its close affinity to w. virginica J. Smith. A fern with onocleoid anatomy is recognized from the middle Eocene Clarno Nut Beds of Oregon. Together, these examples demonstrate that the presence of critical taxonomic features, even in fragmentary remains, can increase our knowledge of filicalean fern evolution, biogeography and ecology in the Tertiary.
    [Show full text]
  • OSMUNDACEAE 1. OSMUNDASTRUM C. Presl, Gefässbündel Farrn, 18. 1847
    This PDF version does not have an ISBN or ISSN and is not therefore effectively published (Melbourne Code, Art. 29.1). The printed version, however, was effectively published on 6 June 2013. Zhang, X. C., K. Iwatsuki & Y. Kadokawa. 2013. Osmundaceae. Pp. 90–92 in Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong, eds., Flora of China, Vol. 2–3 (Pteridophytes). Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. OSMUNDACEAE 紫萁科 zi qi ke Zhang Xianchun (张宪春)1; Kunio Iwatsuki2, Yoko Kadokawa3 Plants terrestrial, with mostly unbranched, often massive, erect, or shortly creeping, ascending, sometimes treelike trunk clothed in roots and persistent stipes, hairy at apex. Rhizome anatomy distinctive, an ectophloic siphonostele (with a pith of parenchyma in center and phloem outside of vascular cylinder only), with a ring of discrete xylem strands, these often conduplicate or twice conduplicate in cross section. Fronds 1- or 2-pinnate, catadromous, when young bearing wool-like, uniseriate hairs, these deciduous or persistent at axes, dimorphic or with fertile portions dissimilar to sterile; stipe caespitose, spirally arranged, with laterally winged stipules at bases, bearing mucilaginous hairs when young, with a single U-shaped vascular bundle; sclerenchyma strongly developed; base of lateral pinnae nearly always distinctly articulate (but only functional in some species); pinnule base sometimes also articulate, though less distinctly so; veins free, subpinnately furcate. Sporangia not assembled in sori, following veins or entirely covering strongly contracted fertile segments, sporangia large, with 128–512 spores, opening by an apical slit, annulus lateral; spores green, subglobose, trilete; gametophytes large, green, cordate, surficial. x = 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Not 100% – but Four Steps Closer to Sustainable Tourism
    C.12 EMBARGOED until 2pm Thursday 18 February 2021 Not 100% – but four steps closer to sustainable tourism February 2021 EMBARGOED until 2pm Thursday 18 February 2021 This report has been produced pursuant to subsections 16(1)(a) to (c) of the Environment Act 1986. The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is an independent Officer of Parliament, with functions and powers set out in the Environment Act 1986. His role allows an opportunity to provide Members of Parliament with independent advice in their consideration of matters that may have impacts on the environment. This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment are available at pce.parliament.nz. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Te Kaitiaki Taiao a Te Whare Pāremata PO Box 10-241 Wellington 6143 Aotearoa New Zealand T 64 4 471 1669 F 64 4 495 8350 E [email protected] W pce.parliament.nz February 2021 ISBN 978-0-947517-24-3 (print) 978-0-947517-25-0 (electronic) Photography Cover images: Hot Water Beach, Eli Duke, Flickr; Akaroa, Bruno d’Auria, Flickr; contrails, Andreina Schoeberlein, Flickr. Chapter header images: Leptopteris superba, John Barkla, iNaturalist; Cyathea dealbata, Hymenophyllum demissum, Paul Bell-Butler, iNaturalist; Anogramma leptophylla, Schizaea australis, Pteris macilenta, Sarah Richardson, iNaturalist; Notogrammitis billardierei, Chris Ecroyd, iNaturalist. EMBARGOED until 2pm Thursday 18 February 2021 Not 100% – but four steps closer to sustainable tourism February 2021 EMBARGOED until 2pm Thursday 18 February 2021 Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment is indebted to a number of people who assisted him in conducting this investigation.
    [Show full text]