Churchill Scholarship Newsletter 2018

201 8 CHURCHILL NEWS THE WINTER ISSUE Newsletter of the Winston Churchill Foundation of the United States KENT GRIFFITH ESZTER ZAVODSZKY ANGELA HARPER THE REMAINERS CHURCHILL fter a life-changing year, typically thought of as the best year of their lives, most SCHOLARS Churchill Scholars return to the US for a PhD. Some try to introduce tea-drinking 2018 –19 A to their American labs. Others retain collaborations with their Cambridge colleagues. Christopher Bambic Kevin Chen A select few, however, devise a way to remain in Cambridge. When the Churchill John Finlay Scholarship started in 1963, it could fund a 1-year degree or a 3-year PhD, similar to what Namrah Habib our much younger sister program, the Gates Cambridge Scholarship, does today. In the Joseph Kannarkat 1980s, however, the Churchill Foundation chose to focus its resources on the 1-year degree, Yousuf Khan and now all of our Scholars study for an MPhil, MASt, or, in rare cases, an MRes. Aswini Krishnan “One year in Cambridge leaves you wanting more,” says Kent Griffith (2013 –14, Jared Duker Lichtman Aishwarya Nene Chemistry). Griffith chose to stay mainly because of his research group. “The combination Scott Neville of research and lab culture was a great fit.” Merrick Pierson Smela Griffith’s research has been in the news recently for potentially revolutionizing Vikram Sundar electric batteries. He is first author of a Nature paper describing how the use of niobium Anna Thomas tungsten oxides can lead to charging lithium ion batteries hundreds of times faster than they Michael Walker currently charge through ceramic electrode materials. Matthew Weidner Timothy Welsh While Griffith is now headed back to the US—to Northwestern where he will work in the same lab as Ramya Gurunathan (2016 –17, Scientific Computing)—Angela Harper (2017 –18, Physics) has just decided to stay in Cambridge to continue her work, also on ESTD 1963 lithium-ion batteries. Harper pointed first to quality of life as her reason for staying. Her lab, CHURCHILL SCHOLARSHIP like most in Cambridge, provides a good balance between hard, high-caliber work and A life-changing year of independent research personal time. continues on page 3 at Cambridge University Letter from the Executive Director he highlight of every year is when I visit the Churchill Scholars in the late spring, as they are either finishing their courses or getting to a crucial stage of their research. T Their excitement is infectious as they look back on what they achieved, while looking forward and seeing how their research, and their lives, will change from the experience. I also visit the Scholars early in their year and bring them to the Churchill War Rooms in London. This year, as has happened roughly every other year, my fall visit included a reconnection with one or more Churchill Scholars who have just finished. These are the “remainers” (with apologies to the anti-Brexiteers whose term we borrowed), who have found a way to stay in Cambridge. The perspective of these former-Churchill- Scholars-still-in-Cambridge has been invaluable in helping me understand just what it is we are accomplishing with this Scholarship. For example, Jarrod Shilts (2017 –18, Biological Sciences) works at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, where he used his one-year MPhil to do something risky and is now staying for a PhD. He used his engineering skills to de - velop a technique to systematically and rapidly test all the possible ways by which two cells can interact. This is the kind of work that Shilts would be reluc - tant to try for a PhD, since there seemed little chance it would work well: “With the independence the scholarship provided me, I could pursue ambitious research plans Mike Morse in the without the fear of my entire PhD project being on the line. As it happened, in my case the viewing chair of the chance to take that ambitious risk paid off more than I could have hoped.” Northumberland Tele - scope, Institute of Before talking to Shilts about this ground-breaking work, I had not fully appreciated Astronomy how the Churchill Scholarship provides a unique opportunity for high-risk, high reward research. After talking with Shilts, I visited Yousuf Khan (2018 –19, Pathology), one of the newly arrived cohort. While still at the beginning of his work, he echoed Shilts in explaining why he finds the Churchill so valuable: “I’m in a unique situation where I can take on a very risky project. If it doesn’t work out for me, then I can change my field of study when I pursue my PhD. However, if the work does yield a high reward, I can continue my work at Stanford next year while maintaining a collaboration with my lab back at Cambridge.” Up to now, I had thought that what makes the Churchill Scholarship so special is the degree of research independence it provides, the links it facilitates with scholars from all over the world, and the work-life balance that is characteristic of Cambridge. Now I see that we also give the very best US graduates a chance to take risks at a very early stage of their careers, and this may be the most exciting aspect of what we do. The Remainers continued from page 1 Also, for Harper, “Cambridge is a heart of intellectual thought and academia,” attracting people from all over the world, which makes it the ideal place to tackle a global issue such as meeting the demand for efficient, clean energy. Mike Gormally (2011 –12, Chemistry) echoes Harper’s views of Cambridge. “That’s an ideal environment for a student and a truly singular situation that I haven’t encountered anywhere else.” Gormally enjoyed working on understanding the structure and function of DNA “walking in the same halls as Watson and Crick.” His PhD focused on unique structures that form in the DNA of cancer cells that could potentially be exploited as drug targets in oncology. Soon, he will finish his MD at Yale. Eszter Zavodszky (2009 –10, Medical Genetics) has remained in Cambridge through her PhD and is on to a post-doc. “I now find myself more at home in Cambridge than anywhere else,” she says. She studies protein degradation in the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, which is so well-equipped that it is understandably hard to leave. She also cites Cambridge’s “multicultural, cosmopolitan feel while simultaneously being a small town where one inevitably runs into acquaintances on the street.” Having these “remainers” in Cambridge is a tremendous asset to the Scholarship. PhD students such as Matt Biancalana (2008 –09, Biochemistry) have hosted get-togethers (funded through annual donations to the Churchill Foundation) for arriving cohorts. More recently Griffith and his wife Alisha Kasam (2014 –15, Engineering) played a formal mentor role for the Scholars. As they have now moved back to the US, Harper is the current Scholars’ main point of contact, along with Jarrod Shilts (2017 –18, Biological Sciences). The Churchill Foundation does not fund Cambridge PhDs anymore. So, how do the Churchill Scholars find funding to stay? The five most common sources are: 1. The Gates Cambridge Scholarship started fund - Smith helped invent “the pill,” Henry Wellcome ing students in the 2001 –02 academic year, thanks was a pioneer of pills generally as a way to deliver to a gift of $210 million from the Bill and Melinda medicine. He put the profits of his pharmaceutical Gates Foundation. (The Gates Foundation also do - company, Burroughs Wellcome (which has since nated $23,000 per year to the Churchill Foundation been subsumed by GlaxoSmithKline), in a charitable in the years 2000 –02, perhaps as a consolation trust. It is now the world’s second-largest charitable prize and so we would not feel excluded from their foundation (after Gates) and is one of Britain’s largess.) Gates Cambridge funds 90 scholars per largest funders of biomedical research. year, and there are separate competitions for those living in and out of the US. When Churchill Scholars 4. The National Institutes of Health Oxford-Cam - apply, they find themselves in the out-of-the-US pool. bridge Scholars Program (funded by the NIH and private donors) taps into the best of the British 2. The Herchel Smith Fund was established by a system, so that US biomedical researchers can bequest in 2001 from an organic chemist whose graduate earlier than in the US and with mentors on research led to the invention of oral contraceptives. both sides of the Atlantic, fostering international Since 2008, the Fund has supported Cambridge’s collaboration. It is a good fit for Churchill Scholars most prestigious and some of its most generous pursuing an MD/PhD. PhD studentships. It is so prestigious that one does not actually apply for it. Cambridge just picks from 5. The Cambridge Trust (formally the Cambridge among its PhD applicants. Commonwealth, European & International Trust) acts as Cambridge’s main internal student funding 3. The Wellcome Trust , like the Herchel Smith body and awards some 500 new scholarships each Fund, got its money from the pill. Whereas Herchel year. It is the largest funder of international students. CHRISTOPHER BAMBIC KEVIN CHEN Chris is fascinated by plasma astrophysics on both Kevin will combine the skills he has developed observational and theoretical levels. He will work in physical and mathematical modeling with tech - with Professor Andrew Fabian on X-ray reverbera - niques in experimental biophysics to understand tion around black holes in Active Galactic Nuclei how molecular components collaborate to produce (AGN) as well as the process of AGN feedback in complex cell behaviors.

Load more