48686 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Notices

Parties: NYK Line (North America), Manager (Qualifying Individual), Dated: August 6, 2010. Inc. and Port of Houston Authority. Kenryo Senda, President/CEO, Karen V. Gregory, Filing Party: Erik A. Erikcson, Esq.; Application Type: QI Change. Secretary. Port of Houston Authority; P.O. Box Praxis SCM, LLC (NVO & OFF), 5725 [FR Doc. 2010–19860 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] Paradise Drive, #1000, Corte 2562; Houston, TX 77252–2562. BILLING CODE 6730–01–P Synopsis: The agreement sets certain Madera, CA 94925, Officers: George discount rates and charges applicable to W. Pasha, IV, President/CEO NYK Line, Inc. (Qualifying Individual), James Dated: August 6, 2010 Britton, CFO, Application Type: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION By Order of the Federal Maritime New NVO & OFF License. Rado International, Inc. dba Rado Commission. [File No. 101 0074] Logistics (NVO & OFF), 2251 Karen V. Gregory, Sylvan Road, Suite C, East Point, Secretary. Tops Markets LLC; Analysis of GA 30344, Officers: Lovett Brooks, [FR Doc. 2010–19859 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] Agreement Containing Consent Orders CEO (Qualifying Individual), Maria to Aid Public Comment BILLING CODE 6730–01–P Caceres, Secretary, Application Type: Add Trade Name. AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. Renaissance Global Logistics LLC ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION (NVO & OFF), 4333 West Fort SUMMARY: Ocean Transportation Intermediary Street, Detroit, MI 48209, Officers: The consent agreement in this License Applicants Kathleen M. Green, Vice President matter settles alleged violations of Logistics Services (Qualifying federal law prohibiting unfair or Notice is hereby given that the Individual), John James, CEO, deceptive acts or practices or unfair following applicants have filed with the Application Type: New NVO & OFF methods of competition. The attached Federal Maritime Commission an License. Analysis to Aid Public Comment application for a license as a Non- Rose Containerline, Inc. dba Fabius describes both the allegations in the Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Containerline (NVO), 259 West 30th draft complaint and the terms of the (NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder Street, , NY 10001, consent order — embodied in the (OFF)—Ocean Transportation Officer: Neal M. Rosenberg, consent agreement — that would settle Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section President (Qualifying Individual), these allegations. 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as Application Type: Remove Trade DATES: Comments must be received on amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 Name. or before September 7, 2010. Sea Cargo Inc. (NVO), 19130 Figueroa CFR 515). Notice is also hereby given of ADDRESSES: Interested parties are Street, Carson, CA 90248, Officers: the filing of applications to amend an invited to submit written comments Shane J. Kennedy, Secretary/Chief existing OTI license or the Qualifying electronically or in paper form. Financial Officer (Qualifying Individual (QI) for a license. Comments should refer to‘‘Tops-Penn Interested persons may contact the Individual), Andrei V. Pilipenko, Traffic, File No. 101 0074’’ to facilitate Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Chief Executive Officer, the organization of comments. Please Federal Maritime Commission, Application Type: New NVO note that your comment — including Washington, DC 20573. License. Golden Jet—L.A., Inc. dba Golden Jet Sea Horse Express Inc. (OFF), 1250 your name and your state — will be Freight Forwarders (NVO), 145–30 Newark Turnpike, 1st Floor, placed on the public record of this 156th Street, Suite E, Jamaica, NY Kearny, NJ 07032, Officer: Desiree proceeding, including on the publicly 11434, Officer: Clifford J. Ivie, Herrera, President/Vice President/ accessible FTC website, at (http:// President/Vice President Secretary (Qualifying Individual), www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm). (Qualifying Individual), Application Type: New OFF Because comments will be made Application Type: New NVO License. public, they should not include any License. Tricon Container Line, LLC (NVO & sensitive personal information, such as Joffroy Warehouse Inc. (NVO), 1251 OFF), 259 West 30th Street, New an individual’s Social Security Number; N. Industrial Park Avenue, Nogales, York, NY 10001, Officers: Neal M. date of birth; driver’s license number or AZ 85621, Officers: Marco A. Rosenberg, Member/Manager other state identification number, or Joffroy, Compliance Officer (Qualifying Individual), Joshua foreign country equivalent; passport (Qualifying Individual), Rodolfo Rosenberg, Manager, Application number; financial account number; or Joffroy, President, Application Type: New NVO & OFF License. credit or debit card number. Comments Type: New NVO License. USTC Global, Inc. (NVO), 20695 S. also should not include any sensitive Maritime and Intermodal Logistics Western Avenue, #132, Torrance, health information, such as medical Systems, Inc. dba MILS dba Fesco CA 90501, Officers: Hyunmo records or other individually Integrated Transport (NVO & OFF), (A.K.A. Sean) Yang, Secretary identifiable health information. In 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1310, (Qualifying Individual), Michelle addition, comments should not include Seattle, WA 98104, Officers: Junko Suh, President/CEO, Application any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or Altman, Secretary (Qualifying Type: New NVO License. financial information which is obtained Individual), Mike Evans, President, Valueway Global Logistics Inc. (NVO from any person and which is privileged Application Type: Trade Name & OFF), 136–56 39th Avenue, Suite or confidential....,’’ as provided in Change. 406, Flushing, NY 11354, Officers: Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. Nippon Express U.S.A. (Illinois), Inc. Zong (David) W. Chen, Vice 46(f), and Commission Rule 4.10(a)(2), (NVO & OFF), 950 N. Edgewood President (Qualifying Individual), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). Comments containing Avenue, Wood Dale, IL 60191– Qian (Arthur) Xie, President/ material for which confidential 1257, Officers: Michiya Shimizu, Secretary/Treasurer, Application treatment is requested must be filed in Senior Vice President/General Type: New NVO & OFF License. paper form, must be clearly labeled

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Notices 48687

‘‘Confidential,’’ and must comply with placing those comments on the FTC Through the expedited bankruptcy FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).1 website. More information, including proceeding, Tops sought to acquire Because paper mail addressed to the routine uses permitted by the Privacy substantially all of Penn Traffic’s assets, FTC is subject to delay due to Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy including its 79 in New heightened security screening, please policy, at (http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/ York, , , and New consider submitting your comments in privacy.shtm). Hampshire (the ‘‘Acquisition’’). The electronic form. Comments filed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: purchase price for the Acquisition was electronic form should be submitted by Jeffrey Perry (202-326-2331), FTC, $85 million. In addition, Tops agreed to using the following weblink: (https:// Bureau of Competition, 600 assume from Penn Traffic ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, approximately $70 million in liabilities penntraffic/) and following the D.C. 20580. and claims. Because the only remaining bidder for the supermarkets was a instructions on the web-based form. To SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant liquidator, the Acquisition represented ensure that the Commission considers to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade the only opportunity to avoid mass an electronic comment, you must file it Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. closing of the Penn Traffic on the web-based form at the weblink: 46(f), and § 2.34 the Commission Rules supermarkets. (https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is In light of the extremely tight ftc/penntraffic/). If this Notice appears hereby given that the above-captioned deadlines inherent in the bankruptcy at (http://www.regulations.gov/search/ consent agreement containing a consent proceeding, and in an effort to avoid index.jsp), you may also file an order to cease and desist, having been mass liquidation of 79 supermarkets in electronic comment through that filed with and accepted, subject to final more than 50 metropolitan areas, website. The Commission will consider approval, by the Commission, has been Commission staff crafted a remedy that all comments that regulations.gov placed on the public record for a period would permit timely consummation of forwards to it. You may also visit the of thirty (30) days. The following the Acquisition while preserving the FTC website at (http://www.ftc.gov/) to Analysis to Aid Public Comment Commission’s ability to obtain full relief read the Notice and the news release describes the terms of the consent to cure the anticompetitive harm that describing it. agreement, and the allegations in the the Acquisition would otherwise cause A comment filed in paper form complaint. An electronic copy of the in certain local areas where Tops and should include the ‘‘Tops-Penn Traffic, full text of the consent agreement Penn Traffic operated competing File No. 101 0074’’ reference both in the package can be obtained from the FTC supermarkets. In light of this text and on the envelope, and should be Home Page (for August 4, 2010), on the extraordinary set of circumstances, the mailed or delivered to the following World Wide Web, at (http:// Commission determined that this address: Federal Trade Commission, www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm). A paper unique remedy would best serve the Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 copy can be obtained from the FTC interests of consumers. (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Public Reference Room, Room 130-H, NW, Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is In particular, before the Acquisition 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, was consummated, Respondents agreed requesting that any comment filed in Washington, D.C. 20580, either in paper form be sent by courier or in writing to divest all of the Penn person or by calling (202) 326-2222. Traffic stores in each local geographic overnight service, if possible, because Public comments are invited, and may market in which the transaction U.S. postal mail in the Washington area be filed with the Commission in either presented potential competitive and at the Commission is subject to paper or electronic form. All comments delay due to heightened security concerns. Respondents further agreed to should be filed as prescribed in the maintain the viability of the acquired precautions. ADDRESSES section above, and must be The Federal Trade Commission Act stores and to cooperate fully with staff’s received on or before the date specified investigation, which continued after the (‘‘FTC Act’’) and other laws the in the DATES section. Commission administers permit the Acquisition was consummated. As a collection of public comments to Analysis of Agreement Containing result of this agreement, even before a meaningful investigation could be consider and use in this proceeding as Consent Order to Aid Public Comment completed, Respondents had committed appropriate. The Commission will I. Introduction and Background themselves in writing to the broadest consider all timely and responsive The Federal Trade Commission relief that might ultimately be public comments that it receives, (‘‘Commission’’) has accepted for public necessary, thereby preserving whether filed in paper or electronic comment, and subject to final approval, completely the Commission’s ability to form. Comments received will be an Agreement Containing Consent protect consumers through remedial available to the public on the FTC Orders (‘‘Consent Agreement’’) from action, while at the same time enabling website, to the extent practicable, at Morgan Stanley Capital Partners V U.S. Tops to consummate the Acquisition (http://www.ftc.gov/os/ Holdco LLC (‘‘Holdco’’), its subsidiary, and prevent the mass shuttering of Penn publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of Tops Markets LLC (‘‘Tops’’), and The Traffic stores. discretion, the Commission makes every Penn Traffic Company (‘‘Penn Traffic’’), In accordance with the agreement effort to remove home contact (collectively ‘‘Respondents’’), that is reached between Respondents and staff, information for individuals from the designed to remedy the anticompetitive early termination of the HSR waiting public comments it receives before effects that would otherwise result from period was granted on January 25, 2010. Tops’ acquisition of the A few days later, Respondents closed on 1 The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, assets of Penn Traffic. The proposed the Acquisition. including the factual and legal basis for the request, Consent Agreement requires divestiture The proposed Complaint alleges that and must identify the specific portions of the of seven Penn Traffic supermarkets and the agreement among Respondents for comment to be withheld from the public record. related assets to a Commission- the sale of the Penn Traffic assets to The request will be granted or denied by the Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with approved buyer. Tops constitutes a violation of Section applicable law and the public interest. See FTC On November 18, 2009, Penn Traffic 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and that the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES 48688 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Notices

Acquisition constitutes a violation of and grocery products in supermarkets supermarket competitors in the relevant Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as because they do not offer a geographic markets is unlikely to deter amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 supermarket’s distinct set of products the alleged anticompetitive effects of the of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as and services that provide consumers Acquisition. The affected markets are amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, by lessening with the convenience of one-stop insulated from new entry or expansion competition in connection with the shopping for food and grocery products. by significant entry barriers, including sale of food and other grocery Although stores such as limited the time and costs associated with the products in supermarkets. assortment stores do sell food and need to conduct market research, select certain other grocery items, they do not an appropriate location for the II. The Parties offer the breadth of services and supermarket, obtain necessary permits Tops is a New York limited liability products sold at supermarkets and thus and approvals, construct a new company with its office and principal do not provide an effective constraint on supermarket or convert an existing place of business in Williamsville, New prices in supermarkets. The evidence structure to a supermarket, and generate York. Prior to the Acquisition, Tops and the Commission’s conclusions on sufficient sales to have a meaningful owned and operated 71 supermarkets in these issues are consistent with its prior impact on . Commission staff New York and Pennsylvania, all under supermarket investigations. evaluated and considered pending and the Tops banner. In addition, five The relevant geographic markets in potential future entry by supermarket supermarkets are owned and operated which to analyze the likely competitive competitors in each of the affected by franchisees under the Tops banner. effects of the Acquisition are: Bath, New geographic markets, as well as entry by Tops is a subsidiary of Holdco, a York; Cortland, New York; Ithaca, New other retailers such as mass merchants. Delaware limited liability company with York; Lockport, New York; and Sayre, In many of the markets, there is unlikely its office and principal place of business Pennsylvania. All of these relevant to be any entry in a time period that in New York, New York. markets were already highly would prevent the anticompetitive Penn Traffic is a Delaware corporation concentrated before the Acquisition, effects. And, in those markets where headquartered in Syracuse, New York. and the Acquisition has substantially entry may occur in the near future, the Prior to the Acquisition, Penn Traffic increased concentration in each of these acquisition, despite new entry, still operated 79 supermarkets in New York, markets, as measured by the Herfindahl would result in highly concentrated Pennsylvania, Vermont, and New Hirschman Index (‘‘HHI’’). Post- markets, and that entry would not Hampshire under the following banners: Acquisition HHIs in the relevant eliminate the anticompetitive harm of Bi-Lo, P&C Foods (‘‘P&C’’), and Quality geographic markets range from 5,000 to the acquisition. Markets. 10,000, and the Acquisition has IV. The Proposed Consent Agreement III. The Proposed Complaint increased HHI levels by between 1,145 and 4,996 points. The high The proposed Consent Agreement As outlined in the proposed concentration levels and staff’s ultimate includes two proposed orders: a Complaint, the relevant product market conclusions regarding the competitive Decision and Order and an Order to in which to analyze the Acquisition is harm likely to result from the Maintain Assets (collectively ‘‘Consent the retail sale of food and other grocery acquisition are not sensitive to changes Orders’’). The purpose of the proposed products in supermarkets. Supermarkets in the precise contours of the relevant Consent Agreement is to: (1) ensure the are full-line grocery stores that carry a geographic markets. Indeed, the continued use, and provide for the wide variety of food and grocery items transaction would be presumptively future use, of the Penn Traffic in particular product categories, unlawful in the geographic areas at supermarket assets, subject to including bread and dairy products, issue even if the relevant geographic divestiture, in the operation of refrigerated and frozen food and markets were defined by radii as large supermarkets at the respective locations; beverage products, fresh and prepared as fifteen to twenty miles. (2) create a viable and effective meats and poultry, produce, shelf-stable According to the proposed Complaint, competitor that is independent of the food and beverage products, staple the Acquisition has substantially Respondents in the operation of foodstuffs, and other grocery products, lessened competition in the relevant supermarkets in the relevant geographic including non-food items, household markets by eliminating direct markets; and (3) remedy the lessening of products, and health and beauty aids. competition between Tops and Penn competition that has resulted from the The hallmark of supermarkets is that Traffic, by increasing the likelihood that Acquisition. they offer consumers the convenience of Tops will unilaterally exercise market To achieve the above goals, the one-stop shopping for food and grocery power, and by increasing the likelihood proposed Consent Agreement requires products. To achieve this, supermarkets of successful coordinated interaction the divestiture of seven Penn Traffic typically carry more than 10,000 among the remaining firms. Absent supermarkets, together with their different products and have at least relief, the ultimate effect of the related assets, to a Commission- 10,000 square feet of selling space. Acquisition would be to increase the approved buyer at no minimum price As alleged in the proposed Complaint, likelihood that prices of food and other within ninety (90) days of the Decision supermarkets compete principally with grocery products would rise above and Order becoming final. Tops and other supermarkets and base their prices competitive levels, or that there would Holdco must secure all third-party primarily on the prices of food and be a decrease in the quality or selection consents and waivers necessary to grocery products sold in other of food, other grocery products, or facilitate the divestitures and to allow supermarkets. Other types of retail services. the Commission-approved buyer(s) to stores, including neighborhood ‘‘mom & For the entry of a new competitor or continue the operation of the Penn pop’’ grocery stores, convenience stores, the expansion of an existing competitor Traffic stores as supermarkets at their specialty food stores, club stores, to deter or counteract the respective locations. As set forth in the limited assortment stores (e.g., , anticompetitive effects of an acquisition, Consent Orders, the stores to be Save-A-Lot), and mass merchants, do entry must be timely, likely, and divested are located in Bath, NY; not, individually or collectively, sufficient. According to the proposed Cortland, NY; Ithaca, NY (two stores); effectively constrain the prices of food Complaint, new entry or expansion by Lockport, NY; and Sayre, PA (two

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Notices 48689

stores). In the event Respondents do not GENERAL SERVICES Administration, Office of Citizen meet their obligations to divest the Penn ADMINISTRATION Services, 1800 F Street NW., Room G139, Washington, DC 20405; telephone Traffic assets, the Commission may [OMB Control No. 3090–0288; Docket 2010– appoint a divestiture trustee to divest 0002, Sequence 16] number: 202–501–0855; fax number: the assets in a manner consistent with 202–501–4281; e-mail address: the Decision and Order and subject to Agency Information Collection [email protected]. Commission approval. Activities; Proposed Collection; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Until all of the Penn Traffic assets are Comment Request; Open Government One comment was received, although divested, the Consent Orders further Citizen Engagement Ratings, it was of a general nature and was not require Respondents to maintain the Rankings, and Flagging; Submission related to our information collection. for OMB Review; OMB Control No. viability, competitiveness, and The comment was as follows: 3090–0288 marketability of the seven Penn Traffic ‘‘All Government Agencies are very supermarkets and related assets. This AGENCY: Office of Citizen Services, secretive. None are complying with President includes keeping the supermarkets open General Services Administration (GSA). Obama’s Executive Order for transparency. for business, performing routine None. FDA, HHS, USDA, USDOI, HHS, ACTION: Notice of a request for MMS, They are all secretive and sneaky. The maintenance, providing appropriate comments regarding an extension to an employees in those agencies work for marketing and advertising, maintaining existing OMB information collection. enrichment of their own wallets and not for inventory levels at the stores, and using the good of American citizens. Greed is the best efforts to preserve relationships SUMMARY: In compliance with the name of what they act for. Washington DC is with suppliers, distributors, customers, Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 bloated, corrupt far far too expensive for and employees. The Consent Agreement U.S.C. Chapter 35), this document taxpayers, colossal mess. You need to audit all agencies. Jean Public 8 Winterberry Court provides that the Commission may announces that GSA is planning to submit a request to extend an Whitehouse Station NJ 08889’’ appoint an interim monitor whose Information Collection Request (ICR) to principal duties are to ensure that Tops What information is GSA particularly the Office of Management and Budget complies with its obligations under the interested in? (OMB). Before submitting this ICR to Consent Orders. The Commission has OMB for review and approval, GSA is Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of appointed John J. MacIntyre, a former soliciting comments on specific aspects the PRA, GSA specifically solicits Penn Traffic employee with more than of the proposed information collection comments and information to enable it thirty years of experience in the as described below. to: supermarket industry, as interim (i) Evaluate whether the proposed DATES: Comments must be submitted on collection of information is necessary monitor. or before September 10, 2010. for the proper performance of the V. Opportunity for Public Comment ADDRESSES: Submit comments functions of the Agency, including identified by Information Collection The proposed Consent Agreement has whether the information will have 3090–0288 by any of the following practical utility; been placed on the public record for methods: (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the thirty (30) days to solicit comments • Regulations.gov: http:// Agency’s estimate of the burden of the from interested persons. Comments www.regulations.gov. proposed collection of information, received during this period will become Submit comments via the Federal including the validity of the part of the public record. After thirty eRulemaking portal by inputting methodology and assumptions used; (30) days, the Commission will again ‘‘Information Collection 3090–0288’’ (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and review the proposed Consent under the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or clarity of the information to be Agreement, as well as the comments ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the collected; and received, and will decide whether to link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that (iv) Minimize the burden of the withdraw its acceptance of the proposed corresponds with ‘‘Information collection of information on those who Consent Agreement or issue its final Collection 3090–0288’’. Follow the are to respond, including through the Consent Orders. instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a use of appropriate automated electronic, Comment’’ screen. Please include your The sole purpose of this analysis is to mechanical, or other technological name, company name (if any), and collection techniques or other forms of facilitate public comment on the ‘‘Information Collection 3090–0288’’ on proposed Consent Agreement. This information technology, e.g., permitting your attached document. electronic submission of responses. analysis does not constitute an official • Fax: 202–501–4067. interpretation of the proposed Consent • Mail: General Services What should I consider when I prepare Agreement, nor does it modify its terms Administration, Regulatory Secretariat my comments for GSA? in any way. (MVCB), 1800 F Street, NW., Room You may find the following By direction of the Commission. 4041, Washington, DC 20405. Attn: suggestions helpful for preparing your Hada Flowers/IC 3090–0288. comments. Donald S. Clark Instructions: Please submit comments 1. Explain your views as clearly as Secretary. only and cite Information Collection possible and provide specific examples. [FR Doc. 2010–19780 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] 3090–0288, in all correspondence 2. Describe any assumptions that you BILLING CODE 6750–01–S related to this collection. All comments used. received will be posted without change 3. Provide copies of any technical to http://www.regulations.gov, including information and/or data you used that any personal and/or business support your views. confidential information provided. 4. If you estimate potential burden or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. costs, explain how you arrived at the Jonathan Rubin, General Services estimate that you provide.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1 sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES