Annual Review 2013

HUMAN VALUES

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013 Edited by Michael Hotchkiss, Office of Communications Erin Graham and Alex Levitov, University Center for Human Values Designed by Neil Mills and Dan Fernandez, Office of Communications Photographs by Frank Wojciechowski Denise Applewhite and John Jameson, Office of Communications Additional photographs by Sameer Khan Candace di Carlo Posters by Matilda Luk, Kyle McKernan, and Neil Mills Office of Communications

In the Nation’s Service and in the Service of All Nations

Princeton University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. The Center particularly invites applications from women and members of underrepresented minorities. For information about applying to Princeton and how to self-identify, please visit: http://web.princeton.edu/sites/dof/applicantsinfo.htm.

Nondiscrimination Statement In compliance with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other federal, state, and local laws, Princeton University does not discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national or ethnic origin, disability, or veteran status in any phase of its employment process, in any phase of its admission or financial aid programs, or other aspects of its educational programs or activities. The vice provost for institutional equity and diversity is the individual designated by the University to coordinate its efforts to comply with Title IX, Section 504 and other equal opportunity and affirmative action regulations and laws. Questions or concerns regarding Title IX, Section 504 or other aspects of Princeton’s equal opportunity or affirmative action programs should be directed to the Office of the Vice Provost for Institutional Equity and Diversity, Princeton University, 205 Nassau Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 or 609-258-6110.

450004-14 printed on recycled paper 2 WELCOME 4 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 18 FOSTERING COLLABORATION 30 TEACHING AND LEARNING 44 SUPPORTING RESEARCH 56 PEOPLE LETTER FROM THE ACTING DIRECTOR

It was an eventful year at the center in more than one way. The center’s director, Chuck Beitz, was on leave, and I had the privilege of minding the store in his absence. We ran all our usual programs, including the Values and Public Life undergraduate certificate and the Graduate Prize Fellowship. We benefited from the presence of nine LSR visiting faculty fellows for the year. And we hosted or sponsored an exciting collection of lectures, seminars, workshops, and conferences throughout the year. In partnership with the Woodrow Wilson School, we also launched a new postdoctoral fellowship in values and public policy and welcomed the first two fellows. We conducted a successful tenure-track search in bioethics with the Department of Philosophy. Johann Frick, who is currently a doctoral candidate at Harvard University, will join the faculty in spring 2014. We are also happy to congratulate center faculty member Chris Eisgruber, who has been appointed Princeton’s 20th president. Our staff, students, faculty, visitors, and executive committee all made valuable contributions to the life and vitality of the center. I want to single out Erum Syed for her consistently outstanding contributions to the center community. Erum stepped down as the center’s assistant director in May and immediately started a job at UC –Davis. We gladly welcome Maureen Killeen as our new assistant director. I hope you will read through this annual review and learn more about the center’s exciting activities and interesting people.

Alan Patten Acting Director, University Center for Human Values, and Professor of Politics 2012–13 Faculty Accomplishments

Peter Brooks Jan-Werner Mueller Delivered the Distinguished Visitor Lecture at Boston University Awarded fellowship at the Collegium for Advanced Studies, School of Law University of Helsinki

John Cooper Delivered the 1814 Lecture at the University of Oslo, the Constellations Taught the Master Class in Ancient Philosophy at Renmin University Lecture at the New School in New York City, and the Saxo Lecture at the in Beijing University of Copenhagen

Marc Fleurbaey Published Wo Europa endet: Ungarn, Bruessel, und das Schicksal der Delivered the Duhem Lecture at the Société de Philosophie liberalen Demokratie (Where Europe Ends: Brussels, Hungary, and the Fate des Sciences in Paris of Liberal Democracy)

Published Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Philip Pettit Assessing Sustainability (co-authored with Didier Blanchet) Delivered the Muenster Lectures in Philosophy at the University of Muenster, the Dewey Lecture at the University of Chicago Law School, and the Eric Gregory Maurice Goldsmith Lecture in Philosophy at Victoria University in Wellington Awarded fellowship at the Tikvah Center for Law & Jewish Civilization at New York University Law School Published On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy Delivered the President’s Lecture at Princeton Alan Ryan Melissa Lane Published On Politics: A History of Political Thought from Awarded fellowship at the Center for Advanced Study in Herodotus to the Present the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University Kim Lane Scheppele Appeared on an episode of “Philosophy Talk” on National Delivered testimony before the U.S. Helsinki Commission on Public Radio Capitol Hill

Delivered the Navin Narayan Memorial Lecture in Social Studies Peter Singer at Harvard University Delivered the Castle Lectures at Yale University

Published Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy (co-edited Delivered a TED Talk on “Effective Altruism” with Verity Harte) Stephen Macedo Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Christopher L. Eisgruber ’83, the Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Public Affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School and the University Center for Human Values, was appointed by Princeton’s Board of Trustees to serve as the University’s 20th president, effective July 1, 2013. Eisgruber has been on the faculty of the center since moving to Princeton in 2001. PEPA SEMINARS MOFFETT LECTURES TANNER LECTURES DECAMP SEMINARS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY COLLOQUIUM PROGRAM IN LAW AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 5

DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013 6 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar: Cecile Fabre THE ETHICS OF MILITARY OCCUPATION

By Michael Otsuka, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow

In February, Professor Cecile Fabre visited from Oxford for a Program in Ethics and Public Affairs seminar devoted to her paper titled “Living with the Enemy: The Ethics of Military Occupation.” The paper begins and ends with evocative descriptions of the choices that confront people in occupied lands in their daily encounters with the occupiers. She draws on her French grandmother’s experience of sharing a house with German soldiers who had been billeted during the occupation. On the one hand, they were enemy agents of an unjust Nazi invasion. On the other hand, they were human beings: shy, polite, young farm boys. Should one comfort one of them when he breaks down in grief upon learning of the death of a loved one? Does it matter whether this loved one is also an enemy soldier who was killed while waging unjust Nazi aggression? Fabre noted that there is almost no philosophical writing on the ethics of occupation. Her own philosophical stance is as follows: contrary to now- orthodox just war theory, the rights and duties of occupying forces and occupied populations are largely determined by the moral status of the war leading up to the occupation.

Above, Cecile Fabre, Oxford University. Left, Fabre’s Feb. 14 PEPA talk, “Living with the Enemy: The Ethics of Military Occupation” DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 7

Program in Ethics and Public Affairs The paper was ideally suited to the UCHV’s interdisciplinary mixture of philosophy, political theory, and law. It therefore prompted a wide-ranging The Program in Ethics and Public Affairs (PEPA) advances the study of and at times spirited discussion in the seminar and over dinner afterwards. the moral purposes and foundations of institutions and practices, both I cannot do justice to the various contributions of others. But here’s a domestic and international. PEPA seminars seek to bring the perspec- sample of the discussion that I’m able to recall: tives of moral and political philosophy to bear on significant issues in On Fabre’s account, one must distinguish those occupied civilians who public affairs. did, and those who did not, support an unjust war leading up to a just oc- October 4, 2012 cupation. The former, but not the latter, have a duty of restitution to pay “Not on the Merits: Kant and the Law of War” taxes to finance the occupation. It will, however, be practically impossible Arthur Ripstein, University of Toronto to tax the former while exempting the latter. It will often be similarly im- November 29, 2012 possible, in wartime, to kill only those who pose an unjust threat without “Stories and Spaces: How Americans Make Race” also killing some who pose no threat. One might nevertheless try to justify Clarissa Hayward, Washington University in St. Louis the killing of the latter on grounds that it was merely foreseen rather than February 14, 2013 useful as a means. Fabre noted that one cannot offer a similar justification “Living with the Enemy: The Ethics of Military Occupation” for taxation. This is because the taxing even of the innocent is useful to Cecile Fabre, University of Oxford the occupying regime. Aren’t they, then, unjustifiably used as a means? April 4, 2013 It was suggested during the discussion that perhaps the taxing of the in- “The Special Significance of Equality of Opportunity” nocent could be justified via an analogy to punishment. We should draw a Martin O’Neill, University of York distinction between the deliberate framing of innocents in order to deter others from crime and the mistaken punishment of innocents to which any effective and procedurally just institution of punishment will give rise. Even if the punishment of the latter is also useful because it deters crime, these people are not treated as mere means in the manner of innocents who are deliberately framed. Nor are the innocents who are taxed by the occupiers treated as means.

The paper was ideally suited to the UCHV’s interdisciplinary mixture of philosophy, political theory, and law. — Michael Otsuka Alan Patten, politics, and visiting speaker Cecile Fabre 8 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

Moffett Lecture: Ezekiel Emanuel THE ETHICS OF HEALTH CARE REFORM AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN MEDICINE

By Mark Alfano, Values and Public Policy Postdoctoral Research Associate, UCHV and the Woodrow Wilson School

Ezekiel Emanuel, a professor of health care management at the University rest of the developed world. This suggests that, if we are able to bring our of Pennsylvania and a member of the UCHV advisory council, began per capita health expenditures more in line with our international peers, the fall 2012 James A. Moffett ’29 Lecture in Ethics with a big number: we could have a more efficient system without resorting to rationing. $2,800,000,000,000. That’s the amount spent on health care in the United When something is bad, people naturally search for a guilty party. Who States in 2012. He put this number in context by pointing out that it’s is to blame for ballooning health care costs? After canvassing several po- slightly more than the GDP of France—the world’s fifth-largest national tential scapegoats, Emanuel pointed out that a large majority of health economy. In other words, really, really big. spending—especially the growth in spending—goes to hospitals, physi- Too big? Emanuel persuasively argued that the answer is yes, based on the cians, and clinical services. Most of that growth has been in technology, fact that U.S. per capita spending falls far above the regression line for the which is often no more beneficial than cheaper, existing interventions. Consequences of metastasizing costs include fewer people purchasing health insurance; states busting their budgets to pay for Medicaid and state-employee health insurance, thus putting pressure on state universities; workers’ wages stagnating; and long-term federal budgetary constraints, which undermine the country’s international standing. This unsustainable status quo is an economic problem, but, Emanuel argued, it also generates moral obligations for patients, physicians, and policymakers. The fact that people have a duty to rescue those in dire need, such as those who show up uninsured at emergency rooms, generates a duty on the part of the res- cued to reduce the burden of rescue. This translates into a duty to purchase health insurance if one can afford it. In parallel,

Ezekiel Emanuel, University of Pennsylvania DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 9

After canvassing several potential scapegoats, Emanuel pointed out that a large majority of health physicians have an obligation to improve the efficiency of the health care spending—especially the growth system by refraining from providing treatments that neither significantly in spending—goes to hospitals, improve the patient’s quality of life or chance of survival, nor reduce side effects or costs. The fee-for-service system of compensation, however, physicians, and clinical services. makes it economically unfeasible for doctors to employ these criteria, — Mark Alfano which in turn generates an obligation for the government to restructure the incentive structure for health care providers. The good news is that the Affordable Care Act, which Emanuel helped to draft, enshrines all of these moral obligations in a law, much of which will be implemented during President Barack Obama’s second term. James A. Moffett ’29 Lectures in Ethics The final portion of Emanuel’s lecture concerned the justice of our two- tiered health care system: those in the lower tier are guaranteed only essential The Moffett Lecture Series aims to foster reflection about moral issues in public life, broadly construed, at either a theoretical or a practical level, health services, whereas those in the upper tier, with their “gold-plated” and in the history of thought about these issues. The series is made possible private health insurance, receive more and better health care services. by a gift from the Whitehall Foundation in honor of James A. Moffett, a Emanuel argued that this dichotomy is not just morally permissible but member of Princeton’s Class of 1929. morally obligatory. In the Lockean tradition, justice requires that people be allowed to do whatever they want (liberty), provided they leave for November 8, 2012 others enough and as good of any resource they consume (fairness). “The Ethics of Health Care Reform and the Future of Guaranteeing that everyone in the lower tier receives essential health care American Medicine” Ezekiel Emanuel, University of Pennsylvania services satisfies the demands of justice. To restrict which health care services people can purchase with their own money, however, would be March 7, 2013 an unwarranted restriction of liberty, and so is morally impermissible. “Good Neighbor Nation: The Democracy of Everyday Life” Nancy Rosenblum, Harvard University Together, these points mean that a two-tiered system isn’t just an acceptable way to allocate health care; it’s the acceptable way to allocate health care. During the question-and-answer period, the most contested point was whether allowing a two-tiered system would in some way undermine fairness, with Elizabeth Harman, Alex Voorhoeve, Henry Richardson, and me, among others, arguing that it might. 10 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

Tanner Lectures on Human Values: Ian Morris HUMAN VALUES IN THE VERY LONG RUN

By Dallas Denery, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow

Ian Morris, a professor of clas- my wife—required severely hierarchical religious and then bureaucratic sics and history at Stanford institutions to guarantee the continued extraction of the food and energy University, likes to think big. necessary to maintain society. Social values, like the acceptance of slavery, For his 2012 Tanner Lectures, the division of society into elites and peasants, even female virginity, all “Human Values in the Very Long worked to support these new farming societies. Socratic Athens was little Run,” he took on nearly 100,000 different from Confucian China as both writers express the sorts of val- years of global history, arguing ues needed for successful bureaucratizing farming societies. that only if historians look at But what exactly is the relation between a society’s values and its form of such vast vistas of human devel- energy and food extraction? Morris suggests a sort of perfect, if passive, opment will they ever be able to fit. As societies move from one stage to the next, their values naturally discern the forest for the trees reflect and support the sorts of social divisions needed to secure their and discover the large-scale pat- continued existence. In one way or another, each of the respondents took terns, structures, and forces that up this question, leaving everyone who attended his talks with much to Ian Morris, Stanford University have and that continue to shape think about. Does culture merely reflect existing forms of energy and our morals, practices, and social food extraction or can it be productive, guiding societies in new and un- formations. From this distance, the cultural differences that seem to dis- expected moral directions? Are values really so context determined or tinguish European societies from Middle Eastern and Asian societies van- are they independent of context, absolute? If the quality of a talk can be ish and what we discover are deep affinities and similarities among people determined by the quality of impassioned conversation it generates, then who, at first glance, seem to possess radically different artistic, cultural, Morris succeeded admirably. and political practices. Over the course of his lectures, Morris traced the evolution of human development from foraging to farming societies and from farming to fos- sil fuel societies. Geographic and environmental factors determine the sorts of societies that develop. For example, about 9,000 years ago, as a minor ice age came to an end, inhabitants of the “lucky latitudes,” that swathe of land beginning at the Fertile Crescent and extending east all the way to China, transformed from foraging societies into farming societies. Game became more plentiful and hunters no longer had to travel so far in search of food. As a result, settlements, the first cities, began to spring up and, surrounded by an abundance of large grasses and big seeds, people took to farming to feed a suddenly growing population. More importantly, farming brought with it social and moral changes, an “evolution of val-

ues” designed to support this new way of life. The growth of cities and Ian Morris, Stanford University; Jonathan Spence, Yale University; the development of private property—my land, my house, my money, and Margaret Atwood, novelist DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 11

Tanner Lectures on Human Values

H U M A N V A L U E S

Above, Jonathan Spence (center) and Peter Brooks, University Center for Human Values (right). At right, in the Margaret Atwood (left) and Joyce Carol Oates, Lewis V E RY LO N G RU N Center for the Arts

The Last 20,000 Years and the Next 100 Tanner Lectures on Human Values

The Tanner Lectures on Human Values are presented annually at a select list of universities around the world. The UCHV serves as host to these lectures at Princeton, in which an eminent scholar from philosophy, religion, the humanities, sciences, creative arts, or learned professions, or a person eminent in political or social life, is invited to present a series of lectures refl ecting upon scholarly and Jean and RebeccaI A NWillard M O R RProfessor I S of Classics

scientifi c learning relating to “the entire range of values pertinent to and Professor of History, Stanford University University Princeton of Trustees The by 2012 © Copyright Communications of ce Of the by Produced the human condition.” E AC H AG E G E T S T H E T H O U G H T I T N E E D S : October 17, 2012 Why Hierarchy and Violence “Each Age Gets the Thought It Needs: Why Hierarchy and Are Sometimes Good Violence Are Sometimes Good” Christine Korsgaardwith commentators and Richard Seaford T H E E VO LU T I O N Biology, Culture,O F VA LU Eand S : the Shape Ian Morris, Stanford University October 17, 2012, 4:30-6:30 p.m. Commentators: Friend Center, Room 101 of Things to Come Christine Korsgaard, Harvard University Margaret Atwoodwith commentators and Jonathan Spence

October 18, 2012, 4:30-6:30 p.m.

350122PS-13 350122PS-13 Nations All of Service the in and Service Nation’s the In Richard Seaford, University of Exeter paper recycled on Printed Friend Center, Room 101 October 18, 2012 “The Evolution of Values: Biology, Culture, and the Shape of Things to Come” Ian Morris, Stanford University Commentators: Margaret Atwood, novelist Jonathan Spence, Yale University 12 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

DeCamp Bioethics Seminars: Aubrey de Grey THE SCIENCE AND ETHICS OF ELIMINATING AGING

By Peter Singer, Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in the UCHV

Aubrey de Grey, chief science offi cer of SENS Foundation, spoke on for Science and Ethics at the Oxford Martin School, said that while he was “The Science and Ethics of Eliminating Aging” at his Ira W. DeCamp largely in agreement with de Grey, he did think that there were some ethi- Bioethics Seminar on October 2, 2012. De Grey is well-known as a pro- cal concerns that needed to be discussed. In particular, he asked, is it fair ponent of antiaging research. What, he asks, could be more important for some people who can afford antiaging treatment to live far longer than than eliminating something that is responsible for two-thirds of all human the statistical norm, when others cannot even reach that norm? Shouldn’t deaths—that is, about 100,000 deaths a day? And aging isn’t fun, either. we focus rather on giving everyone a fair share of the world’s resources, including life-extending medicines?

Right, Aubrey de Grey, SENS Foundation. Left, audience members at de Grey’s Oct. 2 DeCamp seminar, “The Science and Ethics of Eliminating Aging”

De Grey argues that it does not make sense to spend the majority of our medical resources trying to combat the diseases of aging. Apart from the expense, as the patient ages, other aspects of the damage caused by aging will become apparent. A better strategy, therefore, is to attempt to repair the damage done by the aging process, such as the loss of cells and the accumulation of “extracellular junk.” De Grey expressed confi dence that science would develop to the point at which we can reach what he calls “longevity escape velocity”—that is, the point at which we can extend life suffi ciently to allow time for further scientifi c progress that again al- lows additional extensions, and thus further progress and greater longevity. “We don’t know how old the fi rst person who will live to 150 is today,” he said, “but we can be sure that the fi rst person to live to 1,000 is almost certainly less than 20 years younger.” It is not, however, longevity itself that interests de Grey, but rather an extension of healthy, youthful life. In response, Bennett Foddy, a former Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Fellow in Bioethics at the UCHV and now deputy director of the Institute DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 13

Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars De Grey accepted that there might be a period during which antiaging The Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars are open to all students, faculty, and treatments were expensive and available only to the rich, but he thought interested members of the public. Seminars range across a wide variety of this period would be relatively brief, and before long the treatments would topics at the intersections of philosophy, ecology, biology, medicine, and be available to everyone. public policy. The seminar series is made possible by a generous grant from During a lively discussion period, the question was raised whether, as- the Ira W. DeCamp Foundation. suming that our planet can only support a limited number of people, it was better to have a smaller number of people living for 1,000 years, or September 19, 2012 to have more generations of people living shorter lives. At the end of a “Transcending the Means Principle” Alec Walen, Rutgers University stimulating session, that question and many others were left open, but de Grey had clearly succeeded in exciting many in the audience about the October 3, 2012 possibility of dramatically extending the human life span. “The Science and Ethics of Eliminating Aging” Aubrey de Grey, SENS Foundation October 23, 2012 “Moral Entanglements: The Ancillary-Care Obligations of Medical Researchers” Henry Richardson, Georgetown University November 14, 2012 “Permits versus Sales Tax: On the Ethics of Discouraging Smoking” Dan Halliday, University of Melbourne February 13, 2013 Peter Singer, series director “Medical Information and the Duty to Protect Your Own Privacy” and University Center for Anita Allen, University of Pennsylvania Human Values February 27, 2013 “Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Social and Ethical Challenges” Vardit Ravitsky, University of Montreal March 27, 2013 “Spirituality and Clinical Practice: Lessons from Fred” Daniel Sulmasy, University of Chicago April 10, 2013 “The History and Future of Bioethics: A Sociological View” John Evans, University of California–San Diego April 17, 2013 “Global Health Justice and Governance” Jennifer Prah Ruger, Yale University 14 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

Political Philosophy Colloquium: Serena Olsaretti SHOULD SOCIETY SHARE THE COST OF CHILDREN?

By John Dilulio, Graduate Student, Politics

At the April 11 meeting of the Princeton Political Philosophy Colloquium, free-riding has no deleterious impact upon these benefits, then why should Professor Serena Olsaretti of the Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona non-parents subsidize parents? Olsaretti responded that non-parents can addressed the question, “Should non-parents in a just society assist par- avoid the future tax contributions of children and that the consumption ents by absorbing some of the costs of having children?” After surveying of these tax benefits implies fewer benefits for others. Moreover, while some of the standard lines of response to this question, Olsaretti set forth social and economic institutions are structured to make these benefits her proposal for thinking of children as “public goods.” In short, this open to everyone, one can imagine different arrangements under which perspective holds that what children the benefits would be directed to the par- produce for society might be framed ent (e.g., through a so-called “split welfare as an important good from which all system”). Hence, Olsaretti concluded that members ultimately benefit. rightly seeing children as socialized goods Because today’s children will someday provides “evidence for the existence of constitute the work force and pay a cooperative scheme which parents con- taxes, parents who raise well-adjusted tribute to, i.e., a scheme of universal pro- and productive children render a vision of welfare benefits to all citizens.” service, not only to their children and themselves, but also to other citizens. Under this view, the latter thus have an obligation to subsidize the morally required costs of having children. Put in slightly more technical language, children result in positive externalities, which may give the parents enforceable claims under the “fair play principle” against non- parents who are benefiting from the parents’ service. Olsaretti acknowledged that many public goods benefit everyone equally and automatically. However, if this is the case, then is free-riding a problem? In other words, if non- Above, Serena Olsaretti, University of Pompeu Fabra. Right, Olsaretti’s parents have no choice but to enjoy April 11 talk, “Justice and the Costs of Children” the social benefits of children and if DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 15

Stephen Macedo, politics and University Center for Human Values, and visiting speaker Serena Olsaretti

When the discussion opened up to questions, several points were raised. One questioner wondered whether this argument allowed for the possibility of subsidizing “expensive tastes.” For example, someone might expend a great deal of energy providing society with more Arctic salmon, but does this mean that society should bear a cost for the effort? Moreover, others wanted to know if Olsaretti’s contention remained unchanged if, for example, parents are encouraged to have children in order to combat dwindling fertility rates. Another point was raised regarding whether society ought to differentiate between parents who raise their children well versus those who produce children who eventually contribute less to society. This led to a lengthy exchange between numerous participants. Lastly, there was a conversation POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY COLLOQUIUM centering on whether society ought to forgo looking to the instrumental worth of children and focus solely on their intrinsic worth. The Program in Political Philosophy presents a colloquium for graduate students and faculty in which scholars from Princeton and elsewhere lead seminars on a broad range of topics of interest to the University’s political philosophy community. The University Center for Human Values and the Department of Politics co-sponsor the colloquium.

September 27, 2012 “The Poverty of a Well-Ordered Society” Jerry Gaus, University of Arizona November 15, 2012 “What Kind of a Thing Is Land? Hannah Arendt, Object Relations Theorist” Bonnie Honig, Northwestern University

December 6, 2012 “Territorial Rights: Justificatory Strategies” A. John Simmons, University of Virginia February 21, 2013 “Epistemic Democracy for the Real World” Robert Talisse, Vanderbilt University

April 11, 2013 “Justice and the Costs of Children” Serena Olsaretti, University of Pompeu Fabra 16 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

PROGRAM IN LAW AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS

The UCHV is a co-sponsor of Princeton’s Program in Law and Public Affairs (LAPA), an interdisciplinary initiative that supports research and teaching about the role of law in constituting politics, society, the The program supports research and economy, and culture. The program supports the study of law both in teaching about the role of law in the present and over time, and not only in the United States, but also in countries around the world and across national borders. Each year, LAPA constituting politics, society, the brings to Princeton a select group of fellows as well as occasional visitors drawn primarily from the academy, legal practice, and government. It economy, and culture. sponsors a lively program of seminars, workshops, and lectures that bring together faculty members, graduate students, and undergraduates with interests in the law in all of its dimensions. LAPA’s director, Kim Lane Scheppele, is a joint faculty member of the UCHV and a member of its executive committee.

Above, LAPA staff, fellows, and visitors for 2012–13. At right, LAPA visiting fellows George Bustin (left) and Lisa Miller (center) DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING 17

Near right, Kim Lane Scheppele (left), sociology, Woodrow Wilson School, and University Center for Human Values, and LAPA visiting fellow Kathryn Hendley (right). Far right, Hendley’s April 1 LAPA seminar, “Everyday Law in Russia – The View from the Bench”

2012–13 LAPA Fellows Mark Alexander Seton Hall University Law School Kathryn Hendley University of Wisconsin–Madison Martin Loughlin London School of Economics and Political Science Lisa Miller Rutgers University Nathaniel Persily Columbia Law School Alexander Somek University of Iowa College of Law CO-SPONSORED WORKSHOPS/CONFERENCES HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT PROJECT UCHV CONFERENCES FOSTERING COLLABORATION

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013 20 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

Co-Sponsored Workshop PITFALLS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND INFORMED CONSENT

By Simon Cotton, Values and Public Policy Postdoctoral Research Associate, UCHV and the Woodrow Wilson School

April 25, 2013, saw a panel on “Pitfalls of Randomized Controlled Trials somatic feedback). There are also some interesting ethical implications, not (RCTs) and Informed Consent” held at, and jointly sponsored by, the least the tension between advancing understanding in this way and respect- Woodrow Wilson School’s Center for Health and Wellbeing. Franklin ing the treatment needs of subjects. Miller, from the National Institutes of Health, kicked off proceedings Betsey Brada, a sociocultural anthropologist and postdoctoral research with a presentation on the history of attitudes toward informed consent associate with the Center for Health and Wellbeing was next, with in the United States. Prior to the mid- a paper illustrating the ways 1960s, most doctors and researchers in which particularly private subsumed the ethics of research into the medical research relies on, and ethics of treatment, regarding willing pa- plays a role in maintaining, tients as potential research subjects even economic and social inequali- in the absence of consent, just so long ties with examples from her as it was judged unlikely they would be intensive fieldwork on HIV/ harmed. Miller suggested that this was AIDS in Botswana. Princeton’s an ethical and sociological puzzle worthy Angus Deaton concluded with of further research. some reflections on how econom- Postdoctoral Research Associate Mark ics can draw ethical lessons from Alfano, organizer of the panel and af- health research and vice versa. filiated with the UCHV and the Center The World Bank has no institu- for Health and Wellbeing, followed tional review board to evaluate re- with some reflections on the implica- search design for ethical flaws, de- tions of our improved understanding spite the fact that the World Bank of the “placebo effect.” It is increasingly does plenty of experiments. This clear that this is an insufficiently pre- would never pass muster in health cise catch-all term (covering any and all research. Yet, in Deaton’s view, causal factors beyond what is counted as medicine has much to learn from “the treatment”). In the interests of un- economics. He was keen to stress derstanding, measures need to be taken that the status of RCTs as the when designing RCTs to at least ensure medical research “gold standard” that we can differentiate between those various non-treatment effects that have

been identified theoretically (expectation- Postdoctoral research associate confirmation, classical conditioning, and Mark Alfano FOSTERING COLLABORATION 21

I was particularly struck by how each speaker demonstrated, each in their own way, the persuasive impact of professional culture on research practice. — Simon Cotton

should not prevent the use of drugs in cases where valid causal inference can be drawn in other ways, in particular if patients will suffer or die while awaiting the completion of an RCT, or when receiving a placebo as part of such a trial. While time constraints were such that audience discussion had to be limited, I was particularly struck by how each speaker demonstrated, each in their own way, the persuasive impact of professional culture on research practice. To me, this suggested the following question: When and why does this culture change? In particular, are attitudes toward what constitutes ethical research practice molded in the same way as are attitudes regarding what constitutes scientific best practice, or is there a distinct difference between the two? These sorts of questions are only promoted by, and best addressed through, interdisciplinary engagement, serving as a reminder of the value of the UCHV’s mission.

Above and left, the April 25 panel on “Pitfalls of Randomized Control Trials and Informed Consent” 22 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

CO-SPONSORED EVENTS

September 20 “Progressive Confucianism” Public Lecture Stephen Angle, Wesleyan University Co-sponsored by the Program in East Asian Studies October 19–21 Young Ethicists Network Conference The March 15–16 workshop on “The Ethics and Politics of the Global Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy Refugee Regime” October 20 “Intersections: An Inaugural Black Queer Sexuality Studies Graduate March 5 Student Conference” “Love is Legal: LGBT and Human Rights in Russia” Public Lecture Co-sponsored by the Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies, Center for Co-sponsored by the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures African American Studies, Program in American Studies, Graduate School and Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies of Princeton University, Department of History, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, LGBT Center, and Lewis Center for the Arts March 15–16 “The Ethics and Politics of the Global Refugee Regime” Workshop October 26–27 “Literary Theatricality: Theatrical Text” Conference Co-sponsored by the Bobst Center for Peace and Justice, Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Niehaus Center for Co-sponsored by the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Globalization and Governance, and Oxford-Princeton Global Leaders Fellowship Programme November 30–December 1 “Weighing Reasons” Workshop March 30 Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy and Council of the “Peter Sellars on Art, Ethics, and Opera” Workshop Humanities Co-sponsored by the Department of Music, Lewis Center for the Arts, Program in American Studies, and Program in Gender and Sexuality December 1–2 Studies “Non-Aristotelian Physics in the Ancient World” Conference Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy, Department of Classics, April 8–9 Council of the Humanities, and Program in Hellenic Studies “Valery Bryusov and Sergey Prokofiev: On the Symbolist-Soviet Occult” Conference December 3 Co-sponsored by the Office of the Dean of the Faculty, Princeton Institute Special screening of The Cove for International and Regional Studies, Department of Slavic Languages Co-sponsored by the Program in Environmental Studies and Literatures, Department of Music, and Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies December 12 “A Desertist Theory of Justice” Public Lecture April 13 Fred Feldman, University of Massachusetts–Amherst Graduate Conference in Medieval Studies Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy Co-sponsored by the Program in Medieval Studies, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, and Center for the Study of Religion FOSTERING COLLABORATION 23

Robert Keohane, Woodrow Wilson School

May 2–3 “Radical Thought on the Margins” Conference Co-sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in the Humanities, Department of Comparative Literature, Department of French and Italian, Department of Religion, Department of Spanish and Portuguese Languages and Cultures, Department of East Asian Studies, Institute for Comparative Modernities (Cornell University), Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Program in African Studies, Program in European Cultural Studies, Program in Latin American Studies, Center for Collaborative History, and Eberhard L. Fabe 1915 Memorial Fund in the Humanities Council May 3–4 “Crossings and Contentions: A Conference in Honor of Daniel T. Rodgers” April 19–20 Co-sponsored by the Department of History and the Shelby Cullom Davis “Vital Traditions: Greco-Roman Medicine and the Life Sciences in the Center for Historical Studies Twenty-First Century” Conference May 10–12 Co-sponsored by the Council of the Humanities, Department of “Illusions Killed by Life: Afterlives of (Soviet) Constructivism” Conference Anthropology, Department of Art and Archaeology, Department of Classics, Department of Comparative Literature, Department of History, Co-sponsored by the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Department of Philosophy, Stanley J. Seeger ’52 Center for Hellenic Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies, and Princeton Institute for Studies, Program in the Ancient World, Program in History of Science, and International and Regional Studies Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in the Humanities May 17–18 April 19–20 “The Classic of Documents and the Origins of Chinese Political Philosophy” “Assessing the Impact of World War II on Eastern Europe and the Soviet Conference Union” Conference Co-sponsored by the Oxford-Princeton Collaborative Research Partnership Co-sponsored by the Department of History, Council of the Humanities, and Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies June 5–7 “The Importance of Learning: Liberal Education and Scholarship in Historical April 25 Perspective” Conference ”Pitfalls of Randomized Control Trials and Informed Consent” Workshop Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy, Department of History, Co-sponsored by the Center for Health and Wellbeing Council of the Humanities, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, and Office of the Dean of the Faculty April 27 Princeton-Penn-Columbia Graduate Conference in the History of Philosophy Fall 2012–Spring 2013 Princeton Islamic Studies Colloquium Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy and Council of the Humanities Co-sponsored by the Department of Religion; Department of Near Eastern Studies; Institute for the Transregional Study of the Contemporary Middle April 26–27 East, North Africa, and Central Asia; Center for the Study of Religion; “Modernity and Its Discontents” Workshop Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies; and Graduate School’s Student Initiated Academic Program Fund Co-sponsored by the Program in South Asian Studies, Council of the Humanities, and Center for Collaborative History 24 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

History of Political Thought Project THE POLITICAL LANGUAGES OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY

By Jan-Werner Mueller, Director, History of Political Thought Project; Professor of Politics

Historians and political phi- in the work of the prominent Iranian thinkers Ali Shari’ati and Imam losophers gathered in early Khomeini. Stathis Kalyvas of Yale University added that religious actors December to re-examine “The might also come to be moderate politically in similar ways, even if the Political Languages of Christian content of their core religious doctrines differs dramatically. He also em- Democracy.” The subtitle of the phasized, along with Luis Felipe Mantilla of Georgetown University, who event was “Historical Aspects— looked at the evolution of Christian Democratic parties in Latin America, and Lessons for the Present?” that there is always a great of deal of room for interpretation (and political —representing the very mix- adaptation) in these doctrines. A prime example remains the thought of ture of historical contextualiza- Jacques Maritain, whose important idea of a “democratic secular faith” tion and normative probing that was illuminated by Joseph Clair of Princeton University. has become the signature style of workshops organized under

Above, workshop guest Aidan O’Neill. the auspices of the History of Right, the Dec. 7–8 History of Political Political Thought Project. As Thought Project workshop on previous occasions, the event brought together a wide range of people from different national backgrounds and generational cohorts to generate a conversation. The distinguished German theologian Friedrich Wilhelm Graf of Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich analyzed the evolution of German Protestantism in relation to human rights, but most presenters concen- trated on major Catholic thinkers and revisited the controversial question of whether they genuinely reconciled faith and conceptions of modern democracy, or if the acceptance of democracy by the Church after the 1940s turned out to be a more guarded or conditional one. Nadia Urbinati of Columbia University emphasized that Christian Democrats in Italy continued to see themselves as antiliberals, with liberalism understood as secularism and ethical relativism. Other speakers highlighted that many religious actors—not least Pope Pius XII—drew a distinction between true and false forms of democracy, with the latter dominated by secular, materialistic “masses.” Giuliana Chamedes of Harvard University pointed out that similar distinctions could be found FOSTERING COLLABORATION 25

History of Political Thought Project THE POLITICAL LANGUAGES OF CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY

By Jan-Werner Mueller, Director, History of Political Thought Project; Professor of Politics

Finally, a number of speakers critically examined the idea that religion might in fact be indispensable for sustaining democracy—a thought fa- mously found in Tocqueville—as well as the “return of religion” in recent social and political theory. Aline-Florence Manent of Harvard emphasized that German Christian Democrats after 1945 subtly kept shifting between the view that democracy and Christianity were compatible and the no- tion that the former actually depended on the latter. Peter E. Gordon of Harvard critically engaged with what he called the “chastened secularism” of Juergen Habermas, which he worried remained too close to traditional conservative critiques of secularism. Overall, the workshop, like previous History of Political Thought Project ones, helped to start a whole range of conversations among scholars who had not necessarily met before; it served to enrich the imagination of The History of Political Thought Project provides a venue for Princeton contemporary philosophers working on, broadly speaking, state-church students and faculty from different disciplines to discuss both substantive issues; and, not least, it encouraged participants to think more broadly and methodological issues in the history of political thought and seeks to about the underlying normative questions and to compare the thinking build bridges to comparative politics, comparative institutional law, and (and actions) of different religious actors—without, of course, ignoring area studies. crucial theological differences. December 7–8, 2012 The Political Languages of Christian Democracy February 15, 2013 “Realism” in Historical and Normative Perspective

Top, workshop guest Aline-Florence Manent. Right, Jan-Werner Mueller, politics 26 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

UCHV Conference WORKSHOP ON JUSTICE AND BENEFICENCE

By Elizabeth Ashford, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow

The issue of whether positive duties constitute duties of justice or of beneficence is both highly contentious and of considerable practical significance. Nevertheless, there has been little focused discussion on how to draw the distinction between these two kinds of duties. Often, the distinction is simply assumed, even though on reflection it is difficult to give an account of the distinction that is stable across all the contexts in which it arises. The workshop “Justice and Beneficence,” organized by Charles Beitz and Pablo Gilabert, drew together international scholars offering a wide range of normative perspectives on this topic, all of which were focused on the nature and significance of this distinction. The audience was packed throughout the workshop, and the papers evoked a strikingly animated discussion. Charles Beitz’s opening paper put the issue in a fascinating and frequently overlooked historical perspective, demonstrating that certain common contemporary assumptions about what is built into the concepts of justice and beneficence were not assumed by the two key proponents of our modern understanding of these concepts. Barbara Herman offered a highly subtle, broadly Kantian analysis of the distinction, in which she argued that justice has to be in the background of an adequate understanding of duties of justice. Peter Singer, conversely, offered an arresting

Far left, workshop guest Barbara Herman, UCLA. Near left, visiting scholar Iason Gabriel FOSTERING COLLABORATION 27

Seminars and Workshops

The UCHV co-sponsors a limited number of seminars and workshops throughout the academic year that seek to incite thought and discussion about ethical issues in both private and public life.

November 9–10, 2012 “Justice and Beneficence” Workshop

The Nov. 9–10 workshop, “Justice and Beneficence” November 28, 2012 Princeton Workshop in Normative Philosophy Series Victoria McGeer, Princeton University February 7–9, 2013 I argued that the general duty of “The Meaning of The Prince” Workshop February 28–March 1, 2013 justice not to discard persons’ lives “Teaching Law and Humanities” Conference can generate general duties of justice March 28, 2013 Princeton Workshop in Normative Philosophy Series that ought to be made perfect. Chris Heathwood, University of Colorado — Elizabeth Ashford April 5–6, 2013 Princeton Graduate Conference in Political Theory April 8, 2013 Princeton Workshop in Normative Philosophy Series analysis of three of the most important global challenges facing us over John Broome, University of Oxford the coming century, which, he argued, leads to the conclusion that benefi- April 19, 2013 cence should take priority over justice. In a highly provocative discussion, Princeton Workshop in Normative Philosophy Series Leif Wenar analyzed the way in which justice is to be achieved by shaping David Velleman, New York University and coordinating roles. I argued that the general duty of justice not to discard persons’ lives can generate general duties of justice that ought to be made perfect. Laura Valentini offered a compelling analysis of what is at stake in the distinction between justice and beneficence. Pablo Gilabert delivered a highly rigorous analysis of the distinction, which challenged the assumption that duties of justice can only pertain among members of shared social institutions. Rainer Forst, conversely, offered an appealing analysis of justice as constitutive of respectful relations between those who share such membership. 28 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

UCHV Conference THE MEANING OF THE PRINCE

By Rahul Sagar, Assistant Professor of Politics

In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli’s life took a turn for the worse. Unemployed after the fall of the Florentine Republic in 1512, he now found himself Left, Maurizio Viroli, politics. Below, George Kateb, politics suspected of conspiracy against the Medici. Before long he was imprisoned and being tortured with the strappado. Following his release Machiavelli— now a man “deeply wounded in his body and spirit”—set about trying to reverse the “malignity” of his fortune. The principal vehicle of this endeavor was The Prince, a work containing “knowledge of the actions of great men, acquired by long experience in contemporary affairs, and a continual study of antiquity.” Unfortunately, The Prince did little to help Machiavelli’s reputation in his lifetime or after it. Ignored by the Medici, it was published in 1532, whereupon it attracted a number of readers who, distracted by the gore and guile it described, failed to discern Machiavelli’s subtler warnings about the limited utility of those very devices. Precisely because The Prince is both profound and profoundly misunderstood, it continues to cause debate and controversy down to the present day. And it is because they wish to see it better understood that Princeton’s Maurizio Viroli and Anthony Grafton organized “The Meaning of The Prince,” a workshop that brought together scholars of Machiavelli and the Renaissance on the 500th anniversary of the writing of The Prince. The workshop opened with a characteristically learned presentation by Quentin Skinner of Queen Mary, University of London before a packed room in McCormick Hall. The lecture, titled “Describing and Redescribing the Virtues of The Prince,” started by outlining the list of FOSTERING COLLABORATION 29

Right, Quentin Skinner’s February 7 lecture, “Describing and Redescribing the Virtues of The Prince.” Below, Rahul Sagar, politics Precisely because The Prince is both profound and profoundly misunderstood, it continues to cause debate and controversy down to the present day. — Rahul Sagar

virtues that Machiavelli claims a prince ought to have. Skinner then went The final day saw contributions from John McCormick of the University on to make the case that Machiavelli’s objective in The Prince was to revise of Chicago and Viroli. McCormick for his part offered a striking how his contemporaries understood these virtues. interpretation of Chapters 7 and 8 of The Prince wherein Machiavelli The following morning, Emanuele Cutinelli-Rendina of the University discusses the lives of Agathocles, Cesare Borgia, and Liverotto of Fermo. of Strasbourg and Denis Fachard of the University of Lorraine, France, Contrary to those who see Borgia as the “hero” of The Prince, McCormick presented their groundbreaking primary research on the relationship argued that Machiavelli actually esteemed Agathocles more highly, because between The Prince and Machiavelli’s work in the Florentine Chancellery. his decision to have the rich of Syracuse killed in one sharp blow served the Drawing on newly published editions of the diplomatic and administrative interest of ordinary Syracusans. Viroli’s presentation focused on Chapter writings of the Florentine Chancellery, Cutinelli-Rendina and Fachard 26 of The Prince, which contains Machiavelli’s moving “Exhortation” to free showed how far Machiavelli’s actual political experience contributed Italy from foreign occupation. Viroli argued that far from being appended to the ideas and arguments contained in The Prince. This was followed to The Prince at a later date (as some have scholars postulate), Chapter by contributions from Peter Stacey of the University of California– 26 anticipated the emergence of the kind of prince required to redeem Los Angeles and Erica Benner of Yale University, who presented close Italy. Viroli’s presentation was especially poignant because it constituted readings of The Prince. The former focused on how Machiavelli understood his final act before assuming emeritus status. As such one might say the servitude and freedom to be created and maintained through the shaping workshop, Viroli’s parting gift to Princeton, constituted an exhortation, of people’s beliefs and desires, whereas the latter defended the position too—for the continued and sympathetic study of Machiavelli. It certainly that The Prince’s “morality-subverting mask” hid the book’s basic purpose, encapsulated the remarkable range, brilliance, and charm of his many which was to restore “high moral standards in politics” by exposing contributions to intellectual life at Princeton and beyond. “the corrupt maxims practiced, but not openly admitted, by princes and popes.” PROGRAM IN VALUES AND PUBLIC LIFE UNDERGRADUATE CLASSES TEACHING LAW AND HUMANITIES STUDENT PRIZES FILM FORUM HUMAN VALUES FORUM TEACHING AND LEARNING

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013 32 TEACHING AND LEARNING

Letter from the Acting Director VALUES IN PUBLIC LIFE

By Alan Ryan, Acting Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Lecturer with the Rank of Professor in Politics

The forum was a very successful This has been the third year of the Values and Public Life (VPL) un- way of bringing students, faculty, dergraduate certificate program. In the absence of Professor Melissa practitioners, and academic visitors Lane, the founding director who together. was on leave at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral — Alan Ryan Sciences at Stanford University, I have looked after the program. The VPL program continues to estab- accounts of the visitors’ work and its motivation from Elizabeth Ashford, lish itself as a valuable option for a philosopher from the University of St. Andrews, who works on nutri- students interested in the broad tional deprivation as an issue in human rights and was here for the year field of practical ethics, including as a Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow, and Jason Schwartz, who is a the ethics of public policy, human Harold T. Shapiro Research Associate, and who works on issues in health rights, bioethics, and a good deal care provision. VPL Acting Director Alan Ryan more. Some indication of the width Beyond formal academic work, many of our students attended the weekly of the terrain we cultivate is that dinner meetings of the Human Values Forum, run this year with immense this year’s graduating seniors wrote their theses on topics as diverse as the energy and verve by Max Siegel, a junior in the program. The forum was role of race in university admissions, the bargaining process behind the a very successful way of bringing students, faculty, practitioners, and aca- regulatory system for global banking, and the promotion of urban gardens demic visitors together. We also took our second annual field trip, this as a resource for nutritional health in Newark. time to New York, where we visited Human Rights Watch and met with Among the junior-senior seminars available to the students this year Iain Levine, program director, and Lisa Misol, senior researcher, business were “The Ethics of Love and Sex” by Professor Elizabeth Harman and human rights program; the Metropolitan Museum, where we met with and “Ethics and Public Health” by Lecturer Jason Schwartz. The se- Sharon Cott, senior vice president, secretary and general counsel; and the niors participated in a yearlong sequence of senior thesis workshops, United Nations, where we met with Anne-Marie Goetz, chief adviser for culminating in two evenings of presentations to their peers and associ- governance, peace, and security at UN Women. ated faculty. Selected seniors and juniors shared their research at the third With all these strands intertwining, the VPL program is thriving, and annual VPL Undergraduate Conference, with student papers ranging from it benefits greatly from the rich intellectual resources of the University 18th-century conceptions of criminal responsibility to consequentialism Center for Human Values. This is only the third year of the program, in ethics. but it is already a valuable contribution to the life of the center; and on a As part of our efforts to integrate undergraduate students in VPL with purely personal note, it affords the director, acting or regular, a great op- visiting faculty who are here under the auspices of the UCHV and the portunity to meet undergraduates whose liveliness, intelligence, and com- Program in Bioethics, we concluded the conference with two short mitment to public service it is impossible to praise too highly. SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITYETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESS RIGHT DUTY EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESSJUSTICE COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVEJUSTICE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE SOCIETYOBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY PLURALITYETHICS MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATION CASUISTRY IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICS MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW OBLIGATIONEQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULESIMPERATIVE FAIRNESS EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATIONCOMMUNITY SENTIMENTSCITIZEN NATION FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS MODERNITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYRESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION CONSEQUENTIALISM IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW UTILITY EQUALITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONG RULES FAIRNESSDUTY SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY JUSTICE RULES COMPASSIONTEACHING FAIRNESS UTILITYCASUISTRY RECIPROCITY NATURAL RULESLAW IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS EQUALITYOBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTSAND COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY NATURALLEARNING SOCIETY LAW PLURALITY IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY33 RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICSEQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYCASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG DUTY JUSTICE SUPEREROGATORY COMPASSION CASUISTRY RULES RECIPROCITY NATURAL LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY JUSTICE FREEDOM COMPASSION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURALINDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVEPLURALITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZENSENTIMENTS NATION FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY LAW ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT WRONG RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULESRIGHT WRONGFAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYSOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN NATION FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY LAW EQUALITY ETHICS MODERNITYWRONG DUTY RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES LAW EQUALITY RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG EQUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS NATURALUTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS EQUALITYSENTIMENTS JUSTICE FREEDOM COMPASSION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATIONCOMMUNITY SENTIMENTSCITIZEN NATION FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACY MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMRECIPROCITY RULES LAW FAIRNESS EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG JUSTICE DUTY CASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAWRULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTSUTILITY RECIPROCITY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION PLURALITY COMMUNIT CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATURAL NATION LAW IMPERATIVEIDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYCONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY LAW EQUALITYCOMMUNITY RIGHT CITIZEN WRONG NATION DUTY IDENTITY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITYCASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSION RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL LAW OBLIGATION RULES SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVEMODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITYLAW EQUALITY CITIZEN RIGHT NATION WRONG IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYLAW EQUALITY JUSTICE RIGHT COMPASSION WRONG DUTY NATURAL SUPEREROGATORY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTSUTILITY RECIPROCITY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION PLURALITY COMMUNITYCASUISTRY NATURALCITIZEN NATION LAW IMPERATIVE IDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CASUISTRYDEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT PLURALITY WRONG COMMUNITYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYNATURAL RIGHT WRONG LAW IMPERATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS FREEDOMUTILITY RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITYCOMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY

DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT SION CASUISTRY NATURALWRONG LAW DUTYIMPERATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULESSENTIMENTS FAIRNESS FREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY SOCIETY RULES WRONGEQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATURAL CITIZEN LAW NATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY OBLIGATIONETHICS MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETYOBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY LAW CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION RIGHT IDENTITY DUTYDUTY RULES ETHICS SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS MODERNITY UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS CASUISTRY RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE RULESCONSEQUENTIALISM COMPASSION FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY LAW EQUALITY JUSTICE NATURAL COMPASSIONRIGHT LAW WRONG IMPERATIVE DUTYCASUISTRY OBLIGATIONSUPEREROGATORY NATURAL SENTIMENTS LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FREEDOM FAIRNESS OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY UTILITY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULESFREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY PLURALITY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CITIZEN COMMUNITY NATION CASUISTRY CITIZEN IDENTITY NATION IMPERATIVE ETHICS IDENTITY MODERNITY OBLIGATION MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOMOBLIGATION CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAWPLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITYRIGHTLeft, WRONG CITIZEN DUTY Katherine SUPEREROGATORYNATION IDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RESPONSIBILITYHuang RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS ’13.CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY Below, JUSTICE LAW EQUALITY COMPASSION WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY FREEDOM RULES FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY EQUALITY SOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY NATURALPLURALITY CITIZEN LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVENATION IDENTITY CITIZEN OBLIGATION ETHICS NATION SENTIMENTSMODERNITY IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM MODERNITY DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATIONPLURALITY COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY CITIZEN RIGHT NATIONLAW WRONG EQUALITY IDENTITY DUTY RIGHT SUPEREROGATORYETHICS WRONG MODERNITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS RULES UTILITYCASUISTRY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS LAW ULES EQUALITY EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT JUSTICE EQUALITYCOMPASSION WRONG COMPASSION DUTY RULES CASUISTRY CASUISTRYFAIRNESS NATURAL UTILITY NATURAL LAWRECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATIONFAIRNESS EQUALITY SENTIMENTS JUSTICE FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSCOMPASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY LAW ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAWEQUALITY EQUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE RIGHT JUSTICE COMPASSION WRONG COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL RULES NATURAL LAWFAIRNESS SENTIMENTS LAW UTILITYIMPERATIVE FREEDOM RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY RULES SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS SOCIETY FREEDOM EQUALITYINDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACYJUSTICE PLURALITY COMPASSION SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN IMPERATIVE PLURALITY NATION IDENTITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY ETHICS SENTIMENTS CITIZEN MODERNITY NATION FREEDOM RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICS CASUISTRYINDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY QUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG NATION DUTY IDENTITY SUPEREROGATORY LAWETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY RULES RIGHT RESPONSIBILITYFAIRNESS WRONG UTILITY CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION DUTY SUPEREROGATORYCONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW EQUALITYRECIPROCITY RIGHT RULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY JUSTICE RULESCOMPASSION FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY RECIPROCITY NATURAL LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTSJUSTICE FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYCONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT CONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE JUSTICE COMPASSION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSCASUISTRY NATURAL FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYSENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRYCITIZEN NATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LAWRESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG OBLIGATIONDUTY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITYRIGHT WRONG RECIPROCITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONWRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG UTILITY DUTY RECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACY LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN DEMOCRACY NATION IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONPLURALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICS CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY WRONG DUTYOBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITY WRONG DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY NATURAL LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTS JUSTICE FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSCOMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITYIMPERATIVE JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACY LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYOBLIGATION SENTIMENTS PLURALITY DEMOCRACYCOMMUNITY CITIZENSOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATION CASUISTRY IDENTITY ETHICSOBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY RIGHTOBLIGATION WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITYCONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LAW RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG DUTY OBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITYRIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY SUPEREROGATORYFAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYMax COMMUNITY Siegel CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ’14 ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY

DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITYOBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY NATURAL SOCIETY LAW WRONG SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM PLURALITY DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITYETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATIONEQUALITY RIGHT LAW DUTY QUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG UTILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITYLAW IMPERATIVE JUSTICE OBLIGATIONCOMPASSION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACYLAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY SOCIETY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY NATION IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS COMMUNITY MODERNITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGCONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG UTILITY DUTY RECIPROCITYSUPEREROGATORY RULES RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY EQUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICE RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY JUSTICENATURAL COMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL SENTIMENTS LAW IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITYNATION IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT CONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT RULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY UTILITY SUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITYEQUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY NATURAL JUSTICE LAW COMPASSION IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSENTIMENTS SOCIETY FREEDOMINDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN PLURALITYIDENTITY ETHICS COMMUNITY MODERNITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RIGHT WRONG LAW DUTY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY RECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY JUSTICE RECIPROCITY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITY LAW JUSTICE IMPERATIVE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOM LAW IMPERATIVE DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS FREEDOMPLURALITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY COMMUNITY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY NATION IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS MODERNITYCOMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITYOBLIGATION ETHICS CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT WRONG OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITYWRONG RECIPROCITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES EQUALITY NATURAL JUSTICE LAW IMPERATIVE COMPASSIONSOCIETY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS NATURAL PLURALITY LAW FREEDOM IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY OBLIGATION CITIZEN NATION SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY SOCIETY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY NATION CASUISTRY IDENTITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION ETHICS CITIZEN MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY LAW ETHICS EQUALITY OBLIGATION MODERNITY RIGHT CONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY UTILITY SUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY LAW EQUALITY RULES RULES RIGHT EQUALITY FAIRNESS WRONG JUSTICE UTILITY DUTY COMPASSIONSUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL FAIRNESS EQUALITY LAW UTILITY IMPERATIVE JUSTICE RECIPROCITY COMPASSION OBLIGATION RULES CASUISTRYSENTIMENTSFAIRNESS EQUALITY NATURAL FREEDOM JUSTICELAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE COMPASSION SOCIETY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY FREEDOM OBLIGATION CITIZEN DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS NATION SOCIETY IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICS DEMOCRACY MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENPLURALITY NATION ETHICSCOMMUNITY MODERNITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISMFAIRNESS RIGHT WRONGUTILITY LAW DUTYRECIPROCITY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY WRONG RULES DUTY FAIRNESS RULES SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY RULES COMPASSIONRECIPROCITY FAIRNESS UTILITY CASUISTRYRULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESSJUSTICE COMPASSION SENTIMENTS EQUALITY JUSTICE FREEDOMCASUISTRY COMPASSION DEMOCRACY NATURAL NATURAL LAW SOCIETY IMPERATIVE LAW INDIVIDUALITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION PLURALITYOBLIGATION SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS FREEDOM CITIZEN FREEDOM DEMOCRACY NATION DEMOCRACY IDENTITY SOCIETY SOCIETY ETHICSINDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN NATIONCITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM IDENTITYNATION IDENTITY ETHICS LAW MODERNITY ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYWRONG RESPONSIBILITYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY LAW RECIPROCITY EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT RULESRIGHT WRONG WRONGFAIRNESS DUTY DUTY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES JUSTICEFAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY RULES RECIPROCITY NATURAL RULESLAW IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS EQUALITYOBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSCOMPASSION EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSENTIMENTS SOCIETYFREEDOMETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITYDEMOCRACY RESPONSIBILITY SOCIETYPLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITYCITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION CITIZEN IDENTITY NATION LAW ETHICS IDENTITYEQUALITY MODERNITY MODERNITY RIGHT WRONGRESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY DUTY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS CASUISTRY OBLIGATION UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW LAWEQUALITY EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE RIGHT WRONG WRONG COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS RULES LAW FAIRNESSUTILITY IMPERATIVE RECIPROCITY UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY RULES SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESSEQUALITYFREEDOM JUSTICEDEMOCRACYEQUALITY COMPASSION JUSTICE SOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITYCASUISTRY CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE PLURALITY NATURAL OBLIGATION COMMUNITY LAW IMPERATIVESENTIMENTS CITIZEN NATION OBLIGATIONFREEDOM IDENTITY SOCIETY SENTIMENTS ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY FREEDOM PLURALITYRESPONSIBILITY DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY SOCIETY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITYETHICS MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYCONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT CONSEQUENTIALISMWRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITYIMPERATIVE RULES RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS FAIRNESS UTILITYSENTIMENTS EQUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICEFREEDOM RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITYCOMPASSION PLURALITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATURAL NATION LAW IDENTITY IMPERATIVE ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CASUISTRY SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY COMMUNITY LAW EQUALITY NATION RIGHTIDENTITY WRONG ETHICS DUTY MODERNITY SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY RULES CASUISTRYFAIRNESS UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY JUSTICERIGHT WRONG COMPASSION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY NATURAL RULES LAW FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY JUSTICE SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITYEQUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY RIGHT WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULESOBLIGATION FAIRNESS LAW UTILITYEQUALITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM JUSTICE DEMOCRACY COMPASSION SOCIETY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY NATURAL LAWPLURALITY IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NATION IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY ETHICS LAW EQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY WRONG SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALSOCIETY LAW INDIVIDUALITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONPLURALITY COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NATION DEMOCRACY IDENTITY SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY WRONG DUTY CASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW RECIPROCITYRULES EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGFAIRNESS DUTY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTS JUSTICE FREEDOMCOMPASSION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOMNATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMRECIPROCITY LAW EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESS RIGHT WRONG EQUALITY DERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY EQUALITY RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNIT FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONCASUISTRY NATURALCONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT SENTIMENTS WRONG DUTY FREEDOM SUPEREROGATORY DEMOCRACY RULESSOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY UTILITY PLURALITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN NATIONEQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY

UCHV presents the third annual Student

SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALDUTY SUPEREROGATORYLAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULESFAIRNESS FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY EQUALITYINDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS CITIZEN CASUISTRYEQUALITY NATION JUSTICEIDENTITY NATURAL COMPASSION MODERNITY LAW IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITYCASUISTRY OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION OBLIGATION FREEDOM SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY COMMUNITY SOCIETY RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY WRONGCITIZEN DUTYNATION SUPEREROGATORYPLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITYMODERNITY RULES CITIZENRESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS NATION UTILITY IDENTITY CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESSCONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY JUSTICE LAWOBLIGATION EQUALITY COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY LAWNATURAL SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVEWRONG RULES DUTY OBLIGATIONFAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS RULES DEMOCRACY UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RULESJUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION PLURALITY EQUALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY JUSTICE NATURAL COMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY FREEDOM SOCIETY DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMPLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY EQUALITY CITIZEN RIGHT WRONG NATION SUPEREROGATORY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULESOBLIGATION FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITYCOMPASSION LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT NATURAL WRONG SUPEREROGATORYLAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY SOCIETY ULES INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION PLURALITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITY NATURAL ETHICS LAW IMPERATIVE MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM OBLIGATION SOCIETYConference CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY LAW EQUALITY COMMUNITY RIGHT NATIONWRONG IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS UTILITY CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS EQUALITY LAW JUSTICE EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYEQUALITY PLURALITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY COMPASSION CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITY NATURAL ETHICS LAW SENTIMENTS MODERNITYIMPERATIVE FREEDOM RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY OBLIGATION FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETYLAW EQUALITYPLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT COMMUNITY WRONG PLURALITY CITIZENDUTY COMMUNITYSUPEREROGATORY NATION IDENTITY CITIZEN RULESETHICS NATION FAIRNESS MODERNITY IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION CASUISTRY EQUALITY LAW QUALITY JUSTICEOBLIGATION COMPASSIONRIGHT CONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG CASUISTRYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW NATURAL EQUALITY LAW RULES RIGHTIMPERATIVE WRONGFAIRNESS OBLIGATION DUTY UTILITY SUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACYRULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUALITY UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICE COMPASSION PLURALITY RULES FAIRNESS COMMUNITY CASUISTRY EQUALITY CITIZEN NATURAL JUSTICE NATION LAW COMPASSIONIMPERATIVE IDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION CASUISTRY MODERNITY SENTIMENTSNATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY SOCIETY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSCONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW COMPASSION EQUALITY RIGHTCASUISTRY WRONG NATURAL DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW IMPERATIVEEQUALITY OBLIGATIONRULESRIGHT WRONGUTILITY SENTIMENTS DUTYRECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACYFAIRNESS RULES EQUALITYFAIRNESS SOCIETY JUSTICE UTILITYINDIVIDUALITY COMPASSIONRECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULESCASUISTRY COMMUNITY FAIRNESS NATURAL JUSTICECITIZEN LAW IDENTITYCOMPASSIONIMPERATIVE ETHICS OBLIGATION CASUISTRY MODERNITY SENTIMENTSNATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW FREEDOM IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION SOCIETY FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY LAW EQUALITY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT CITIZEN WRONG PLURALITY IDENTITY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN NATIONRULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICSUTILITY CASUISTRY MODERNITYRECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY LAW OBLIGATION JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISMRIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYLAW NATURAL EQUALITY LAW RIGHT IMPERATIVE RULES WRONG FAIRNESS OBLIGATIONSUPEREROGATORY UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY EQUALITY JUSTICE RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE NATURAL COMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITYSENTIMENTS FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY LAW PLURALITY EQUALITYSOCIETY COMMUNITY RIGHTINDIVIDUALITY WRONG CITIZEN DERNITY PLURALITY NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITYCOMMUNITY ETHICS CITIZEN CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISMMODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT LAWOBLIGATION WRONG EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY LAW SUPEREROGATORYFAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITYRULES DUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS RULES JUSTICE UTILITY FAIRNESS COMPASSION RECIPROCITYRULES EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSIONNATURAL EQUALITY LAW CASUISTRYIMPERATIVE JUSTICE NATURALCOMPASSION OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS CASUISTRYIMPERATIVE NATURALFREEDOM OBLIGATION LAW DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS IMPERATIVE SOCIETY FREEDOMOBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITYCOMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN PLURALITY SOCIETY NATION COMMUNITYINDIVIDUALITY ID CITIZEN PLURALITY NATION COMMUNITY IDENTITY ETHICS CITIZEN MODERNITY NATION IDENTITY RESPONSIBILITY MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRECIPROCITY RULES RULESEQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSION JUSTICE CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN CITIZEN NATION NATION IDENTITY IDENTITY ETHICS ETHICS MODERNITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT RIGHT WRONG WRONG DUTY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS UTILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RECIPROCITY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS EQUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE JUSTICE COMPASSION COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYMODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG LAW DUTY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY FAIRNESSSUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION EQUALITY NATURAL JUSTICE LAW COMPASSION IMPERATIVE NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY COMMUNITYINDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN PLURALITY NATION COMMUNITY IDENTITY ETHICS CITIZEN MODERNITY NATION IDENTITY RESPONSIBILITY ETHICS MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT EQUALITY WRONG RIGHT DUTY WRONGRULES FAIRNESSDUTY SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITYCE RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NA Undergraduate Certiﬁcatefor the Program in SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES SOCIETYFAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICEPLURALITY COMPASSION COMMUNITY CITIZEN CASUISTRY NA NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYRULES F CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY NATION IDENTITYAIRNESS ETHICSUTILITY MODERNITY RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULESDEMOCRA FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FA RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGEQUALITY DUTY JUSTICE SUPEREROGATORY COMP RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYBILITY OBLIGA PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY OBLIGA DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONTION SENTIMENTS TIONCONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM ASSIONFREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVEEQUALITY SOCIETY WRONGRIGHT OBLIGATIONINDIVIDUALITY WRONGDUTY SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS DUTYPLURALITY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM COMMUNITY RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS CITIZEN RULES NATION UTILITYSOCIETY FAIRNESS IDENTITY RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY UTILITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITYRECIPROCITYPLURALITY FAIRNESS COMMUNITYRESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESSCITIZEN JUSTICE CASUISTRY NA COMPASSION EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURALJUSTICE LAWCOMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVERIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYTION IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS COMMUNITYMODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTYCONSEQUENTIALISM SUPEREROGA LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSINDIVIDUALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN NA EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENF IDENTITYAIRNESS UTILITY ETHICS RECIPROCITY MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATIONCOMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISMCASUISTRY IMPERATIVE LAW OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY SOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY RULES FAIRNESS COMMUNITY UTILITY CITIZEN RECIPROCITY NATION RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYIDENTITY JUSTICE ETHICS COMPASSION MODERNITYFAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW RULESIMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACYCITIZEN NATION SOCIETY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT SION CASUISTRY NATURALWRONG LAW DUTYIMPERATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULESSENTIMENTS FAIRNESS FREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY SOCIETY RULES WRONGEQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATURAL CITIZEN LAW NATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY OBLIGATIONETHICS MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETYOBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY LAW CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION RIGHT IDENTITY DUTY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITYITY CASUISTRY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMP OBLIGATION JUSTICE CONSEQUENTIALISM COMPASSION CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY NATURAL RIGHT LAW WRONG IMPERATIVE DUTY OBLIGATIONSUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY UTILITY RECIPROCITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CITIZEN NATION CASUISTRY IDENTITY IMPERATIVE ETHICS MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS FREEDOMOBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAWPLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITYRIGHT WRONG CITIZEN DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATION IDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW EQUALITY COMPASSION WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY FREEDOM RULES FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY EQUALITY SOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY NATURAL CITIZEN LAW IMPERATIVENATION IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICS SENTIMENTSMODERNITYCASUISTRY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY LAW OBLIGATION EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHTCONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY LAW EQUALITY CITIZEN RULES RIGHT NATION FAIRNESS WRONG IDENTITY UTILITY DUTY RECIPROCITYSUPEREROGATORYETHICS MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESS RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION UTILITYCASUISTRY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL RULES FAIRNESSLAW LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE WRONG COMPASSION DUTY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS NATURAL UTILITY LAWRECIPROCITY IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSCOMPASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY LAW ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE WRONG COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY IMPERACASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESSASSION LAW CASUISTRY UTILITYIMPERATIVE NATURAL RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION LAWTION IMPERATIVE RULES IDENTITY SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS OBLIGATIONETHICS MODERNITY FREEDOMEQUALITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY DEMOCRACYJUSTICE FREEDOM COMPASSION SOCIETYDEMOCRACY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY SOCIETYOBLIGATION PLURALITY IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY CITIZENLAW EQUALITY SENTIMENTS NACITIZEN RIGHT NATION WRONGFREEDOM IDENTITY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY LAWETHICS EQUALITY MODER RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATIONEQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISMTIVE RIGHT SENTIMENTS WRONG SUPEREROGA FREEDOM LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZENFAIRNESS NATION UTILITY IDENTITY RECIPROCITY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITYFAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LA NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONDEMOCRA SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYCASUISTRY SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY EQUALITY RIGHT CITIZEN WRONG NATION DUTY SUPEREROGATORYIDENTITY ETHICS RULESMODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FA OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHTRULES FWRONGCY SOCIETY DUTY INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAWNATURAL EQUALITY LAW WRONG IMPERATIVE DUTY SUPEREROGATOR OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYCOMMUNITYAIRNESS CITIZEN PLURALITY UTILITY NA RECIPROCITYRULES COMMUNITY NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY EQUALITY ETHICS JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW EQUALITYDEMOCRA RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSEQUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYTORY RULES FAIRNESSNATURAL UTILITY LAW IMPERATIVE RECIPROCITY OBLIGATIONRULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY JUSTICE DEMOCRACY COMPASSION SOCIETY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY NATURAL PLURALITYLAW IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NATION FREEDOM IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM ISTR LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMTION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY LAWRIGHT EQUALITY WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY RIGHT SUPEREROGATORY WRONG OBLIGATION DUTY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULESSUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW RULES EQUALITY RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS RIGHT RULES WRONG UTILITY FAIRNESS DUTY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE RULES UTILITY COMPASSIONFAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY CASUISTRY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS NATURAL COMPASSION LA CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSOBLIGA UTILITY RECIPROCITYCASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTSJUSTICE COMPASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATIONCOMMUNIT CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NATION IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICSCY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITYINDIVIDUALI C CITIZEN EQUALITYTION RIGHT SENTIMENTS WRONG DUTY FREEDOM SUPEREROGA DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LA RACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTYTION SUPEREROGATORY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSI- UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES TORY TORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGA IRNESS SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMDUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW RULESEQUALITYFAIRNESS FAIRNESS RIGHTEQUALITY UTILITY WRONG JUSTICE RECIPROCITY DUTY COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS EQUALITY NATURALRULES LAWJUSTICE IMPERATIVE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOM LAW IMPERATIVE DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY SENTIMENTSINDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM PLURALITY DEMOCRAC FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYALITY COMMUNITY SOCIETY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY NATION IDENTITY PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FA ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS RULESUTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE NATURAL COMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYTION PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN NARESPONSIBILITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMP EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYCASUISTRY NATURAL NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOM FREEDOM SOCIETY DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGA DUTY SUPEREROGATORYSOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITYFAIRNESS UTILITY PLURALITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZENFAIRNESS NATION EQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITY FREEDOM WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITYRULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITYRULES IDENTITY MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RIGHTOBLIGATION WRONG SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CITIZEN NATION JUSTICE IDENTITY COMPASSION MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTSTIALISM LAW EQUALITY FREEDOM LAW RIGHT EQUALITY DEMOCRACY WRONG RIGHT DUTY SOCIETY WRONGSUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY DUTY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS UTILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LA IRNESS EQUAL- PLURALITY COMMUNITYRECIPROCITY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY EQUALITY RIGHT SOCIETYSION WRONG CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL PLURALITY LAW RULES IMPERATIVE COMMUNIT FAIRNESS CITIZENOBLIGATION UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS IDENTITY ULES ETHICSFREEDOM FAIRNESS MODERNITY DEMOCRACY EQUALITYCOMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY SOCIETY WRONG CASUISTRY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION NATURAL PLURALITY LAWCONSEQUENTIALISM IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN LAW EQUALITY NATION SENTIMENTS IDENTITY RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM ETHICS DUTY MODERNITY SOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES PLURALITY CASUISTRY FAIRNESS COMMUNITY OBLIGATIONUTILITY RECIPROCITYNATION CONSEQUENTIALISM IDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS LAWMODERNITY EQUALITY EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT JUSTICE DUTY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS CASUISTRY OBLIGATION UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESS LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY JUSTICE RIGHT FREEDOM COMPASSION WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY CASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY NATURALRACY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY LAW RULES INDIVIDUALITYIMPERATIVE FAIRNESS PLURALITY PLURALITYOBLIGATION UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN CITIZEN RULES NATION FREEDOM NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS ETHICS SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION LAW CITIZEN QUALITY NATION RIGHT IDENTITY WRONG DUTY ETHICS SUPEREROGATORY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYRULES F OBLIGATION EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONMODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY LAW EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG PLURALITY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZENCONSEQUENTIALISM NATIONRULES FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICSUTILITY LAW EQUALITY MODERNITYRECIPROCITY RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY RULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY CASUISTRYSUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE RULES COMPASSION LAW FAIRNESS QUALITY NATURAL UTILITY RIGHT WRONGRECIPROCITYLAW IMPERATIVE DUTY SUPEREROGATORYRULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE FREEDOM COMPASSIONUTILITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY SOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITYNATURAL FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVEPLURALITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION COMPASSION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS CASUISTRYNATION FREEDOM IDENTITY NATURAL DEMOCRACY ETHICS LAW MODERNITY IMPERATIVE SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITYOBLIGATION SENTIMENTS PLURALITY CASUISTRY DEMOCRACYCITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION SOCIETY EQUALITY IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT ETHICS WRONG MODERNITY PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN CASUISTRY RULES NATION FAIRNESS OBLIGATION IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICSCONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITYRECIPROCITY MODERNITY RECIPROCITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY LAWRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RIGHT EQUALITYCASUISTRY WRONG JUSTICE JUSTICE OBLIGATION DUTY COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURALRULES FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVECONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS LAWNATURAL EQUALITY FREEDOM LAW RIGHT IMPERATIVEDEMOCRACY WRONG OBLIGATION DUTYSOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY WRONG SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY RULESFREEDOM UTILITYPLURALITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY SOCIETY RULES CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS NATION EQUALITY PLURALITYIDENTITY JUSTICE ETHICS MODERNITYCOMPASSIONOBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL CASUISTRY FREEDOMLAW IMPERATIVEOBLIGATION DEMOCRACY OBLIGATIONCONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY LAW FREEDOMEQUALITY PLURALITY DEMOCRACYRIGHT COMMUNITY DUTY RULES SOCIETY CITIZEN FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS PLURALITY RECIPROCITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS CITIZEN JUSTICEIDENTITY CASUISTRY COMPASSION ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY RULES RIGHT RECIPROCITY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITYRULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS CITIZEN COMPASSION UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY IDENTITY ETHICS RULESNATURAL MODERNITYFAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATIONJUSTICE OBLIGATIONCOMPASSION SENTIMENTSIDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS FREEDOM MODERNITY NATURAL DEMOCRACY RESPONSIBILITY LAW SOCIETYIMPERATIVE CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION PLURALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY LAW CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION RIGHT IDENTITY WRONG DUTY ETHICS SUPEREROGATORY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYRULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FA LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGSENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORYFREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULESCOMMUNITY FAIRNESS CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION JUSTICE IDENTITY COMPASSION ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVEDUTY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES LAW FAIRNESS EQUALITY FREEDOM UTILITY RIGHT DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY WRONG DUTYSOCIETY RULES SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY PLURALITY RULES FAIRNESSJUSTICE CITIZEN COMPASSION UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS RULES NATURAL MODERNITY FAIRNESS LAW RESPONSIBILITYIMPERATIVEEQUALITY JUSTICE OBLIGATION CASUISTRY COMPASSIONS SENTIMENTSOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITYCASUISTRY FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL PLURALITYDEMOCRACYSOCIETY LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE LAW EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZENOBLIGATION RIGHT NATION WRONG PLURALITYSENTIMENTS IDENTITY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICSFREEDOM MODERNITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY CITIZEN RULES NATIONRESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY UTILITYCASUISTRYETHICS RECIPROCITYMODERNITY PLURALITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY RULES COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS CITIZEN OBLIGATION EQUALITY NATION LAW JUSTICE CONSEQUENTIALISMEQUALITY IDENTITY COMPASSION ETHICSRIGHT WRONG MODERNITY LAW CASUISTRY DUTYEQUALITY RESPONSIBILITYSUPEREROGATORY NATURAL RIGHT WRONG LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE RULESDUTYCOMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS OBLIGATION CASUISTRY UTILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL RULESRECIPROCITY FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE RULES LAWUTILITY EQUALITY EQUALITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY JUSTICE RIGHT SENTIMENTS RULESCOMPASSION FREEDOM FAIRNESS CASUISTRYDEMOCRACY EQUALITY NATURALSOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY LAWCOMPASSION IMPERATIVE PLURALITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY NATURAL SENTIMENTS CITIZEN LAW IDENTITY IMPERATIVE FREEDOM ETHICS OBLIGATIONDEMOCRACY MODERNITYCY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITYSENTIMENTS SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYFREEDOM DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY SOCIETY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYWRONG SOCIETY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY RULES FAIRNESS COMMUNITY UTILITY CITIZEN RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITYEQUALITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVEINDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY RIGHT WRONG COMMUNITYFREEDOM DUTY DEMOCRACY SUPEREROGATORYCITIZEN NATION SOCIETY ETHICS RULES INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION EQUALITY IDENTITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE ETHICS COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY LAW NATURAL EQUALITY CASUISTRY LAW RIGHT IMPERATIVE WRONG OBLIGATIONFAIRNESS DUTY OBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORYCONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY RULES FREEDOMLAW RULES EQUALITYFAIRNESS DEMOCRACYFAIRNESS RIGHT UTILITY EQUALITY WRONG SOCIETY RECIPROCITY DUTY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS PLURALITY CASUISTRY RULESEQUALITY COMMUNITY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVEJUSTICE CITIZEN UTILITY COMPASSION OBLIGATION NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITYCASUISTRY SENTIMENTS RULES ETHICS NATURAL FAIRNESS FREEDOM MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE SOCIETYOBLIGATION COMPASSION OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY FREEDOM IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY LAW OBLIGATION EQUALITY CITIZEN SOCIETY SENTIMENTSRIGHT NATIONISTRY INDIVIDUALITY WRONGOBLIGATION IDENTITY FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITYETHICS DEMOCRACY MODERNITY COMMUNITY LAWSOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT NATION WRONG OBLIGATION IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICSCONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY LAW FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY WRONG CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY DUTY OBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORYRULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSIONEQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY WRONG NA DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESSW EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITYPLURALITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION EQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE ETHICS COMPASSIONMODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY WRONG FREEDOM DUTY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY SUPEREROGATORYFAIRNESS UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RULESRECIPROCITY FAIRNESS RULESPLURALITY UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY EQUALITY CITIZENRULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS NATION COMPASSION IDENTITY EQUALITY ETHICSCASUISTRY JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION NATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW NATURAL IMPERATIVE LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATIONIMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOMSENTIMENTS LAW DEMOCRACYEQUALITY FREEDOMETHICS RIGHT DEMOCRACYSOCIETY MODERNITY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY RULESCITIZENPLURALITY CONSEQUENTIALISMFAIRNESS NATION COMMUNITY IDENTITY UTILITY CITIZEN RECIPROCITYMODERNITY LAW EQUALITYNATION RESPONSIBILITY RULES IDENTITY RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG ETHICS CASUISTRY EQUALITYDUTY MODERNITY RULES OBLIGATIONJUSTICE FAIRNESSRESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW NATURAL RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS LAW RIGHT IMPERATIVE EQUALITYLAW WRONG EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICEDUTY RIGHT SUPEREROGATORY COMPASSION SENTIMENTSWRONG DUTY CASUISTRY FREEDOM RULES FAIRNESS NATURALDEMOCRACYIMPERATIVE UTILITY LAW SOCIETY IMPERATIVE RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOMSENTIMENTS EQUALITY DEMOCRACY FREEDOM JUSTICE SOCIETY DEMOCRACY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY CASUISTRYPLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY NATURAL PLURALITY CITIZENLAW IMPERATIVE NATION COMMUNITY IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICSCITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS NATION IDENTITY FREEDOMCASUISTRY ETHICS DEMOCRACY OBLIGA MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENCOMPASSION NATION ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY NATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY SOCIETY RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY WRONG DUTY PLURALITY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION IDENTITYUTILITY RECIPROCITY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESSRESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATIONCOMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACYFAIRNESSIMPERATIVE UTILITY SOCIETY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS RULES PLURALITY FAIRNESSFREEDOM COMMUNITY EQUALITYCOMPASSIONSOCIETYEQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE CITIZEN COMPASSION NATION PLURALITYCASUISTRY IDENTITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATURAL ETHICS IMPERATIVEMODERNITY LAW CITIZEN IMPERATIVE NATION RESPONSIBILITYOBLIGATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY SENTIMENTS ETHICSCASUISTRY SENTIMENTS MODERNITY FREEDOM OBLIGATION FREEDOM SOCIETYRESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY EQUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY COMMUNITY RIGHT COMMUNITYCONSEQUENTIALISM WRONG CITIZEN DUTY NATION NATIONSUPEREROGATORY IDENTITYLAW IDENTITY EQUALITY EQUALITYETHICS ETHICS RULES RIGHT MODERNITY RIGHT MODERNITY WRONG WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORYSUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY RULES RULES OBLIGATIONFAIRNESS OBLIGATION FAIRNESS UTILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITY RECIPROCITY RULES LAW FAIRNESS RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESSEQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE EQUALITY WRONG COMPASSION DUTY JUSTICE SUPEREROGATORY COMPASSIONCASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY RULES LAW FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE NATURAL UTILITY OBLIGA LAW IMPERATIVERECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESSY SENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM JUSTICE DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSCONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW COMPASSION EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG DUTYNATURAL SUPEREROGATORY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY RECIPROCITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICECOMPASSION COMMUNITY CITIZENCASUISTRY NATION NATURAL IDENTITY LAW MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY COMMUNITY LAW EQUALITY CITIZEN RIGHT NATION WRONG IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICS MODERNITYEQUALITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY RIGHTFAIRNESS WRONG UTILITY CASUISTRY DUTY RECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES LAW FAIRNESSRULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RIGHT UTILITY WRONG JUSTICE RECIPROCITY DUTY COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS RULES NATURAL JUSTICE FAIRNESS LAWCOMPASSION UTILITYIMPERATIVE RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULESNATURAL SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTSJUSTICE COMPASSION SOCIETYFREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRYDEMOCRACY NATURAL SOCIETYPLURALITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETYLAW INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY CITIZEN COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY NATION CITIZEN IDENTITYSOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITYETHICS IDENTITY MODERNITY ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITYRESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION OBLIGATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LA LAW RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYLAW RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT EQUALITYCOMPASSION WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL UTILITY LAW RECIPROCITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONRULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM JUSTICE SOCIETYCOMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL COMMUNITY LAW IMPERATIVESOCIETY NATION OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS SENTIMENTS PLURALITY MODERNITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN NATIONCASUISTRYSOCIETY IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISMPLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY LAW CASUISTRY CITIZEN EQUALITY IDENTITY OBLIGATION RIGHT ETHICSWRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY RULES CASUISTRY WRONGFAIRNESS OBLIGATIONDUTY UTILITY SUPEREROGATORY RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY EROGATORYEQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITYRULES JUSTICERULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY UTILITY SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES RULES JUSTICE EQUALITY FAIRNESS COMPASSION JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITYCASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW LAW IMPERATIVE IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICEOBLIGATION COMPASSION SENTIMENTSSENTIMENTS FREEDOMCASUISTRY FREEDOM DEMOCRAC DEMOCRACYNATURALTION SENTIMENTSLAW SOCIETY IMPERATIVE FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION DEMOC- PLURALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYDEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY LAW INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT PLURALITY WRONG DUTYCOMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM JUSTICE COMPASSION LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRYRECIPROCITY RIGHT NATURAL WRONG RULES LAW FAIRNESSDERNITY IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL DEMOCRACY LAWCONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITY PLURALITY FREEDOM RIGHT COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY WRONG SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY RULES FAIRNESS ETHICSPLURALITY MODERNITY UTILITY COMMUNIT RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATIONRULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICSOBLIGATIONEQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE CONSEQUENTIALISMNITY CITIZENCOMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITYCASUISTRY CASUISTRY ETHICS NATURAL MODERNITY OBLIGATION LAW RESPONSIBILITY IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY LAW EQUALITYSUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY WRONG RULES DUTY SUPEREROGATORYFAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RULES RECIPROCITY FA CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY EQUALITY MODERNITYASU- JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSCASUISTRY FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY LAW EQUALITY PLURALITY WRONG COMMUNITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN IDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMMODERNITY LAW RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG DUTYOBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITY WRONG DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY NATURAL RULES FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION SENTIMENTSFAIRNESS NATURAL FREEDOM EQUALITY LAW JUSTICE IMPERATIVE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONFREEDOM DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY PLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY PLURALITY CITIZEN COMMUNITY NATION CITIZEN IDENTITY NA ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYW CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULESDUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVEJUSTICE RULES FAIRNESS COMPASSION OBLIGATION UTILITY CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY NATURAL FREEDOM RULES LAW FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE EQUALITY SOCIETYOBLIGATION JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS COMPASSION PLURALITY FREEDOM CASUISTRY FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY NATURAL UTILITY SOCIETY LAW RECIPROCITY IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY RULES OBLIGATION PLURALITY FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS COMMUNITYEQUALITY FREEDOM JUSTICE CITIZEN COMPADEMOCRACY NATION IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITYRESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION CONSEQUENTIALISMIDENTITY MODERNITY LAW RESPONSIBILITYEQUALITY WRONG DUTYCASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW EQUALITY RULES RIGHT FAIRNESS WRONG EQUALITY DUTY JUSTICE SUPEREROGATORY COMPASSION NATURAL RULES FAIRNESS LA UTILITYW RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULESOBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITYCOMPASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURALINDIVIDUALITY LAW PLURALITY IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NATION IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICS SOCIETYMODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION LA IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONWRONG DUTY LAW RULES QUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY NATURAL RULES FAIRNESSLAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRA NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOMITY PLURALITY DEMOCRACY COMMUNITY SOCIETY CITIZEN INDIVIDUALITY NATION IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FA LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHTSION WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY NATURAL SUPEREROGATORYRECIPROCITY LA RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY JUSTICE RECIPROCITY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTSCOMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW PLURALITYIMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NA FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYCASUISTRY SOCIETY OBLIGATIONINDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISMNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN LA CASUISTRY NATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISMETHICS MODERNITY LAW RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGCASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW EQUALITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT RULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY EQUALITY SUPEREROGATORY JUSTICEIRNESS UTILITY RULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAWPLURALITY IMPERATIVE COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN SENTIMENTS NATION IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICS DEMOCRACY MODERNITY SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY LAW EQUALITY ETHICS WRONGMODERNITY DUTY RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RECIPROCITYMENTS FREEDOM RULES LAW DEMOCRA FAIRNESSEQUALITY RIGHTEQUALITY WRONG JUSTICE DUTY COMPASSION SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL RULES LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITYY INDIVIDU- ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYCOMPASSION WRONG DUTY CASUISTRY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAWRULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATIONUTILITY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY EQUALITY SOCIETYJUSTICE COMPASSIONINDIVIDUALITY NATURAL PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION SENTIMENTS IDENTITY ETHICS FREEDOM MODERNITY DEMOCRACY RESPONSIBILITYSUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY RULES F OBLIGATION PLURALITY COMMUNITYCONSEQUENTIALISM CITIZEN LAWNATION EQUALITY IDENTITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUALITYINDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE PLURALITY COMPASSION COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATION IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYCONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY CITIZEN LAW EQUALITY NATION IDENTITY RIGHT WRONG ETHICS DUTY MODERNITY SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS OBLIGATIONUTILITY RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITYINDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULES FAIRNESSCITIZENW IMPERATIVE NA EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYW SENTIMENTS FREEDOMTION DEMOC- IDENTITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW ASSION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALUTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES CY OBLIGATION SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY TION CONSEQUEN- SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMCITIZEN IDENTITY LAW EQUALITYETHICS MODERNITYAIRNESS RIGHT WRONG UTILITYRESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITYDUTYW EQUALITY RULES RULES FAIRNESS RIGHT FAIRNESS DUTY UTILITY RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL JUSTICELAW IMPERATIVE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOMLAW IMPERATIVE DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY SENTI- RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRPLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONOBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOMFAIRNESS DEMOCRACY LA TION EQUALITY IDENTITY SOCIETY JUSTICE ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION MODERNITY CASUISTRYRESPONSIBILITY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS LAW FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY RIGHT WRONG SOCIETY DUTY INDIVIDUALITYSUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITYFAIRNESS IRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICEAIRNESS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYTIVE OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESSSENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM DEMOCRAJUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY PLURALITY COMMUNITYNATURAL LAW CITIZEN IMPERATIVE NATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY ETHICS SENTIMENTS MODERNITY FREEDOM RESPONSIBILITY DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITYRIGHT ETHICS WRONG MODERNITY DUTY SUPEREROGA YRESPONSIBILITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYTION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONRACY SOCIETY CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY NATURAL PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE CITIZEN OBLIGATION NA W EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTYTURAL SUPER- LAWCASU- SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYRULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISMW RULESEQUALITY F RIGHT LAW WRONG CASUISTRYEQUALITY DUTY OBLIGATIONRIGHT SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITYUTILITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY JUSTICERULES RECIPROCITY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITY LAW JUSTICEIMPERA- TION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONCOMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NA DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY Y SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMU- PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESSRULES FAIRNESSUTILITY RECIPROCITY EQUALITY JUSTICE RULESTORY COMP FAIRNESSRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY JUSTICE RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOC-IRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITYRESPONSIBILITY ETHICS MODERNITYCASUISTR RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYCYSOCIETY OBLIGATIONINDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYTION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY SIONCONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE RIGHT OBLIGATIONWRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICSCASUISTRY MODERNITY NATURAL LA RESPONSIBILITYTION IDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LA LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY AIRNESSRIGHT WRONG EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY TION SENTIMENTS FREEDOMY SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITYTION EQUALITY ETHICS NA RIGHT MODERNITY WRONG DUTYRESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM UTILITY RECIPROCITY LAW RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT EQUALITY WRONG JUSTICEDUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMPASSION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVESUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULESW F IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGATIONASSION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY NATURAL FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS COMMUNITY MODERNITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY MODERNITY CY SOCIETYW EQUALITY INDIVIDUAL-W IMPERATIVE RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITYCOMMUNITY RIGHT CITIZEN WRONG NA DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYEQUALITY JUSTICE SOCIETY COMP INDIVIDUALITYW EQUALITY PLURALITY RIGHT COMMUNITYWRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGA- TION IDENTITYIRNESS ETHICS UTILITY MODER- CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSRESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTR AIRNESS RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYNATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRYTION OBLIGA IDENTITY OBLIGATION ETHICS MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALQUENTIALISM LAW LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITYASSION RIGHT OBLIGATION CASUISTRY WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS NATURAL SUPEREROGATORY LAW FREEDOMIMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY PLURALITYJUSTICE COMPASSION COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATION NATURAL IDENTITY LAW IMPERATIVEETHICS MODERNITY OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITYSENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NATION DEMOCRACY IDENTITYY OBLIGATION MODERNITY SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY LAW EQUALITY COMMUNITY RIGHT WRONGCITIZEN DUTYNATION SUPEREROGATORY IDENTITY ETHICS RULESRESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULESOBLIGATION FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW COMPASSION EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYOpen RULES FAIRNESS to EQUALITYthe JUSTICE University COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVETION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETYTION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICSINDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY MODERNITY PLURALITYCOMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITYCASUISTRY CITIZEN ETHICS NATION OBLIGATION MODERNITY IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY CASUISTRYOBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG OBLIGA- CONSE- DUTY TION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY

SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES and the public — all are FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYSOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITYFAIRNESS UTILITY PLURALITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZENFAIRNESS NATION EQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITY FREEDOM WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITYRULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITYRULES IDENTITY MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RIGHTOBLIGATION WRONG SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CITIZEN NATION JUSTICE IDENTITY COMPASSION MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY welcome to attend PLURALITY COMMUNITYRECIPROCITY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY EQUALITY RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNIT FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY EQUALITYCOMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL LAWCONSEQUENTIALISM IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY SOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY RULES PLURALITY FAIRNESS COMMUNITY UTILITY RECIPROCITYNATION IDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONMODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY LAW EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG PLURALITY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATIONRULES FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICSUTILITY MODERNITYRECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION LAW QUALITY NATURAL RIGHT WRONGLAW IMPERATIVE DUTY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY SOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY PLURALITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY COMPASSION CITIZEN CASUISTRYNATION IDENTITY NATURAL ETHICS LAW MODERNITY IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS RECIPROCITY MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAWNATURAL EQUALITY LAW RIGHT IMPERATIVE WRONG OBLIGATIONDUTY SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS RULESFREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY SOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY PLURALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE Friday, April 26, 2013 Marx Hall, Room 301 SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYEQUALITY SOCIETY RIGHT WRONG WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE LAWSENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM RIGHT DUTY DEMOCRACY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE CITIZEN COMPASSION NATION IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS MODERNITYNATURAL LAW RESPONSIBILITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOMCONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY LAW SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG PLURALITY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION IDENTITYUTILITY RECIPROCITY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES FAIRNESSRESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSSOCIETY RULES UTILITY INDIVIDUALITYFAIRNESS RECIPROCITY UTILITY PLURALITYRULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS COMMUNITY RULES EQUALITY CITIZENFAIRNESS JUSTICE NATION EQUALITY COMPASSION IDENTITY JUSTICE MODERNITY CASUISTRY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAWOBLIGATION OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION FREEDOM SENTIMENTS LAW DEMOCRACY EQUALITY FREEDOM SOCIETYWRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITYRULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION CITIZEN UTILITY IDENTITY NATION RECIPROCITYRULES ETHICS IDENTITY MODERNITY MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMCASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RIGHT RIGHTOBLIGATION WRONG WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY UTILITY INDIVIDUALITY RECIPROCITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY RULES RULES FAIRNESS COMMUNITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY EQUALITY CITIZEN JUSTICE NATION JUSTICE COMPASSION IDENTITY COMPASSION MODERNITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL NATURAL LAW LAW CASUISTRYIMPERATIVE IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYPLURALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITYRECIPROCITY CITIZEN CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CASUISTRYNATURAL CASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOM LAW LAW EQUALITY DEMOCRACY EQUALITY RIGHT RIGHT SOCIETY WRONG WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITRULES FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY CITIZEN UTILITY NATION RULES RECIPROCITY IDENTITY FAIRNESS ULES ETHICS EQUALITY FAIRNESS MODERNITY JUSTICE EQUALITYCOMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL OBLIGATION NATURAL LAW LAWIMPERATIVECONSEQUENTIALISM IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DUTY SOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES PLURALITY FAIRNESS PLURALITY COMMUNITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITYNATION IDENTITYCITIZEN RULES NATION ETHICS FAIRNESS IDENTITYMODERNITY EQUALITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICEMODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITYCASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS LAWEQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT FREEDOM RIGHT WRONG WRONGDEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULESEQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSIONMODERNITY JUSTICE CASUISTRYCOMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL CASUISTRY CASUISTRY LAW NATURALSENTIMENTS OBLIGATION LAW FREEDOM IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOMRIGHT WRONG PLURALITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITYCITIZEN NATIONRULES PLURALITYFAIRNESS IDENTITY ETHICS UTILITYCOMMUNITY MODERNITYRECIPROCITY CITIZEN RESPONSIBILITY NATIONRULES FAIRNESS IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICSEQUALITY MODERNITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY LAW QUALITY NATURAL RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONGLAW IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITYRULES FAIRNESS RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG UTILITY DEMOCRACY DUTY RECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESSEQUALITY PLURALITY UTILITYJUSTICE COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY COMPASSION CITIZEN RULES CASUISTRYNATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY NATURAL EQUALITY ETHICS LAW MODERNITY IMPERATIVEJUSTICE COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY NATURAL DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG SENTIMENTS PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS SOCIETY IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS RECIPROCITY MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITYCONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAWNATURAL CASUISTRYEQUALITY LAW RIGHT OBLIGATIONIMPERATIVE WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATIONDUTY SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITYRULESFREEDOM UTILITY RIGHTDEMOCRACY RECIPROCITY WRONG SOCIETY DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY PLURALITY RULES JUSTICEFAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACY LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSPLURALITY COMMUNITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CITIZEN IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY OBLIGATIONSUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITY WRONG DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICESENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY NATURAL SOCIETYLAW IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN DEMOCRACY NATION IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRYRIGHT WRONG OBLIGATION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES LAW FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITY WRONG DUTY RULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES JUSTICEFAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURAL FAIRNESS LAW IMPERATIVEEQUALITY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACYSOCIETY LAW IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSPLURALITY COMMUNITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY CITIZEN NATION SOCIETY IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYWRONG OBLIGATION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES LAWFAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY RIGHT RECIPROCITY WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES EQUALITY RULESJUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION UTILITY CASUISTRY RECIPROCITY NATURAL RULES LAW FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITYCOMPASSION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM NATURAL DEMOCRACY LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYOBLIGATION SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN SOCIETYNATION IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY NATION CASUISTRY IDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGATIONRIGHT WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESS RIGHT WRONG UTILITY DUTY RECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY JUSTICE RECIPROCITY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYPLURALITY SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAWCASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY LAW SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYEQUALITY JUSTICE RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS EQUALITY NATURAL JUSTICE LAW IMPERATIVE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL LAWFREEDOM IMPERATIVE DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS CITIZENMODERNITY NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY LAWCASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITYCOMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE JUSTICE COMPASSION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY NATURALFREEDOM LAW DEMOCRACY IMPERATIVE SOCIETY OBLIGATION INDIVIDUALITY SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN IDENTITY CASUISTRY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG CONSEQUENTIALISM SUPEREROGATORY LAW RULESEQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT WRONG UTILITY DUTYRECIPROCITY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS RULES EQUALITYFAIRNESS JUSTICE UTILITY COMPASSIONRECIPROCITY RULESCASUISTRY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION SENTIMENTS FREEDOMCASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENCONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY ETHICS LAW EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY RIGHT WRONG CASUISTRY DUTY OBLIGATIONSUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW UTILITY EQUALITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONG RULES DERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY 1:30–2:45 p.m. Student Panel 1 1:30–6:30 p.m.

Undergraduate Class ETHICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH

By Raphael Frankfurter ’13, Anthropology

How far can mandatory vaccine laws go? Is stigma an appropriate public Dr. Schwartz is truly gifted at making this type of class work: committed health approach to smoking and obesity? Second-hand smoke may be and focused but flexible, agnostic during the discussions but ready to a threat warranting a response, but what about third-hand smoke on point out concrete historical and policy connections, and extremely lucid people’s clothes? When is it acceptable to remove someone from society in guiding—and recapping— the conversations. under the belief that they may be contagious? As I enter into a global public health career next year, I do think I will refer These are the topics we explored each week in “Ethics and Public Health,” back to this course quite a lot. While answers may ultimately elude us, I had taught by Jason L. Schwartz ‘03, the Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral never before encountered at Princeton the process of taking an important Research Associate in public health issue that demands an intervention and breaking it down Bioethics, all stemming from into ethical steps, figuring out where other frameworks and principles one fundamental dilemma: may apply, what assumptions must be made, and where empirical data can how far should policies go be used to justify the intrusion on personal liberty. I wonder how many in restricting personal liberty health professionals have experienced such an intellectual process. And for the benefit of the public’s I’m aware of how fortunate I am to be given this entrée into public health health? Though we searched ethics with such an impressive, engaged and experienced group of peers for frameworks and principles and such a skilled instructor. that can guide policy and interventions, we often left class aware that these issues Left, Kevin McKee ’14 and Brendan Bertagnoll ’13. Below, postdoctoral research associate Jason Schwartz ‘03 are phenomenally complex and simple answers aren’t likely to be found. Still, in so deeply probing the literature—both public health and political- philosophy—we often reached some strikingly nuanced conclusions. This was one of those classes at Princeton where one comes to appreciate the true value of interdisciplinarity in a liberal arts education. Though the class may not have been fully representative of the country’s political makeup, it certainly was methodologically diverse. Students included natural scientists, who stressed the importance of empirical validity in a public health program; sociologists, who thought in terms of demographic risk-environments and the social determinants of health; policy majors, who considered concrete interventional design; philosophy majors, who valued normative principles and explicit articulation of how ethical stances are arrived at; and a small contingent of anthropologists, including myself, who urged the class to consider that moral and behavioral stances should not be disconnected from the social contexts from which they emerged. TEACHING AND LEARNING 35

I’m aware of how fortunate I am to be given this entrée into public health ethics with such an impressive, engaged, and experienced group of peers and such a skilled instructor. — Raphael Frankfurter

Above, Teguru Tembo ’13 and Raphael Frankfurter ’13. Below, Deanna Zhu ’15 36 TEACHING AND LEARNING

Undergraduate classes

VPL Seminars Freshman Seminars The VPL junior and senior seminars aim to cultivate students’ abilities to Capitalism, Utopia, and Social Justice analyze, criticize, and construct systematic arguments about values in Marc Fleurbaey Kurt and Beatrice Gutmann Freshman Seminar in public life. While the seminars vary considerably in their thematic content, Human Values they are linked by a common pedagogical purpose and an approach that emphasizes intensive small group discussion and advanced writing exercises. Designing Life: The Ethics of Creation and Its Control Elizabeth Harman The seminars provide an explicit link between the core coursework of the Dean Eva Gossman Freshman Seminar in Human Values certificate and the independent work requirement. Democracy, Crime, and Punishment Explaining Values Lisa Miller PHI 380/CHV 380 Class of 1976 Freshman Seminar in Human Values Victoria McGeer, University Center for Human Values Constitutionalism 3.0 Moral Conflicts in Public and Private Life Alexander Somek POL 416/CHV 416 University Center for Human Values Freshman Seminar Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values Science and Buddhism Merton and King Robert Wright REL 366/CHV 366 University Center for Human Values Freshman Seminar Albert Raboteau, Religion Ethics and Public Health CHV 331/WWS 372 Cross-Listed Courses Jason Schwartz, Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Research Associate Ethical and Scientific Issues in Environmental Policy in Bioethics CHV 321/ENV 321/WWS 371 The Ethics of Love and Sex Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values; and David Wilcove, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Woodrow Wilson School CHV 390/PHI 390/GSS 391 Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Consequentialism CHV 523 Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values Sex, Gender and Sexuality from the Enlightenment to Today FRE 354/CHV 353/GSS 353 Natasha Lee, French and Italian Introduction to Moral Philosophy PHI 202/CHV 202 Michael Smith, Philosophy TEACHING AND LEARNING 37

Political Philosophy Clues, Evidence, Detection: Law Stories PHI 309/CHV 309 CHV 375/COM 392/ENG 379 Kwame Anthony Appiah, Philosophy and University Center for Peter Brooks, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor for Distinguished Human Values Teaching, University Center for Human Values Greek Ethical Theory The Ethics of Love and Sex PHI 335/CHV 335/HLS 338 CHV 390/PHI 390/GSS 391 Hendrik Lorenz, Philosophy Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Explaining Values Interdisciplinary Legal Studies PHI 380/CHV 380 CHV 560/SOC 528 Victoria McGeer, University Center for Human Values Kim Lane Scheppele, Sociology, Woodrow Wilson School, and University Center for Human Values Systematic Ethics PHI 524/CHV 526 Systematic Ethics Frank Jackson, Philosophy; Philip Pettit, Politics and University Center for PHI 307/CHV 311 Human Values; and Michael Smith, Philosophy Sarah McGrath, Philosophy Moral Conflicts in Public and Private Life Normative Ethics: Ethics and the Empirical POL 416/CHV 416 PHI 519/CHV 519 Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values; Sarah-Jane Leslie, Philosophy; and Sarah McGrath, Philosophy The Political Pact POL 464/CHV 464 Martin Loughlin, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Merton and King REL 366/CHV 366 Albert Raboteau, Religion Ethics and Public Policy WWS 370/POL 308/CHV 301 Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values

Ethics and Public Health CHV 331/WWS 372 Jason Schwartz, Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Research Associate in Bioethics 38 TEACHING AND LEARNING

Teaching Law and Humanities A DISCUSSION ON THE STATE AND THE FUTURE OF AN IDEA

By Peter Brooks, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor of Distinguished Teaching

the questions raised by the law and humanities movement will no longer find a place in legal education? Are they obsolete or irrelevant? Will law as a theoretical construct, somewhat in the manner of psychoanalysis, find its last refuge in humanities departments? If many law schools are in fact rededicating themselves to the black letter training of lawyers, does the law and humanities enterprise become less necessary, or more so? I see the benefits of law and humanities scholarship as deriving in some part from the transgression of one field by another: not a meeting of minds but a productive quarrel. Can there continue to be any productive dialogue between the two fields, or has trans- disciplinary challenge reached a point of exhaustion? These and other questions provided thoughtful and sometimes impassioned debate, starting at dinner on February 28 and extending throughout the day on March 1. There was unanimity that the participants were the leading figures (and critics) of law and humanities, and that the Teaching law alongside the interpretive humanities has for a number of discussions were enormously helpful in thinking through the status of years been a movement, with courses, conferences, periodicals, even now legal education, and its relation to other fields. Already, a number of the a Modern Languages Association “Approaches to Teaching” volume on participants are thinking about new contexts in which to present the study the subject. It’s never been a secure field; it’s encountered a fair measure of law. For myself, I have come to a new understanding of the advantages of rejection, and had its obituary written. I think trying to make it a “field of teaching law, not as a professional discipline but as a form of thought of study” has maybe obscured its more radical and important ambitions. and social action, within a liberal arts university such as Princeton. The UCHV symposium “Teaching Law and Humanities” was designed to return to the root questions: to think anew about why students of law might want the kind of context provided by the interpretive expertise taught in the humanities; and why students in the humanities might be interested in the performative uses of language in the law. Above and left, the March 1 symposium, “Teaching Law These questions take on a new urgency at the present moment, when many and Humanities” law schools, under pressure from the market and the legal profession— too many new J.D.’s with large debt and unsatisfactory job prospects—are increasingly turning, or returning, to a definition of themselves as trade schools, possibly reversing a trend toward a more scholarly definition of legal education. Some have proposed reducing law study to two years, and devoting more of it to clinics in the practice of law. Does this mean that TEACHING AND LEARNING 39

Hendrik Hartog, history, (left) and symposium organizer Peter Brooks, University Center for Human Values Teaching Law & Humanities A discussion on the state & the future

of an idea Teaching Law and Humanities: A Discussion on the State and the Future of an Idea Friday, March 1, 2013

9 a.m.–6 p.m., Whig Hall Raphael, Ceiling of the Stanza della Segnatura, detail: Justice Digital Image Copyright © Scala / Art Resource, NY Session 1: Law and Language Session 1: Law and Language 9 a.m.–10:45 a.m. “A ‘Position Paper’ on Teaching Law and Humanities” Kerry Abrams, Marianne Constable, University of California–Berkeley Amy Adler, University of Virginia Law School Session 2: Philosophy, Law, Peter Brooks, New York University School of Law Respondents: Paul Kahn, Yale Law School, and and Literature Anne Cheng, Princeton University 11 a.m.–12:45 p.m. Marianne Constable, Princeton University Hendrik Hartog, Princeton University Elizabeth Emens, University of California-Berkeley Session 3: Law, Rhetoric, Carol Greenhouse, Columbia Law School Janet Halley, Princeton University Session 2: Philosophy, Law, and Literature and Reading Hendrik Hartog, Harvard Law School 2 p.m.–2:45 p.m. Ruth Herz, Princeton University “Six Theses on Teaching Law and Humanities—and an Essay Paul Kahn, Birkbeck College, University of London Yale Law School on Interpretation” Session 4: Law, History, and Bernadette Meyler, Contexts of Study Julie Stone Peters, Cornell Law School/Stanford Law School Martin Stone, Cardozo Law School Robert Post, Columbia University 3 p.m.–4:45 p.m. Camille Robcis, Yale Law School Respondents: Jeannie Suk, Harvard Law School, and Caleb Smith, Austin Sarat, Cornell University Final Remarks Kim Lane Scheppele, Amherst College Yale University Susan Schmeiser, 5 p.m.–6 p.m. Princeton University Caleb Smith, University of Connecticut School of Law Simon Stern, Yale University Martin Stone, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Session 3: Law, Rhetoric, and Reading Contact information: Kim Girman, [email protected] or 609-258-5496 Cardozo School of Law Sponsored by the University Center for Human Values and the ProgramJeannie in Law Suk, and Public Affairs Harvard Law School “Law and Humanities: Two Attempts” Produced by the Of ce of Communications | Copyright © 2013 by The Trustees of Princeton University | 350223-13 Robin West, Georgetown Law Center Peter Brooks, Princeton University

Respondents: Susan Schmeiser, University of Connecticut School printed on recycled paper of Law, and Amy Adler, New York University School of Law Session 4: Law, History, and Contexts of Study “Law, Literature, and History: The Love Triangle” Bernadette Meyler, Cornell Law School Respondents: Robin West, Georgetown Law Center, and Austin Sarat, Amherst College 40 TEACHING AND LEARNING

student prizes

Senior Thesis Prize Graduate Student Top-Up Prizes, 2013–14

Each year, the center awards prizes to the senior theses that make an out- The UCHV offers prizes to help attract Princeton graduate students whose standing contribution to the study of human values. Nominations for the prize work explicitly focuses on ethics, political theory, and human values. In spring are made by departments across the University. 2013, the following students were awarded these grants.

Colleen Culbertson Anat Benzvi Brian Ho Department of Anthropology Department of German Department of French and Italian “Testing the Malaria Vaccine: Membership, Expertise, and the ‘Adverse Effects’ of Accountability” Adviser: Rena Lederman, Anthropology Ying Kit Chan Benjamin Hofmann Department of East Asian Studies Department of Politics Victoria Lauren Cadiz Department of Philosophy Charles De la Cruz Soo Jin Kim “Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics and Natural Law Theory” Department of Politics Department of Politics Adviser: Benjamin Morison, Philosophy Brahim El Guabli Isabella Litke Mariana Olaizola Department of Comparative Department of Politics Department of Politics Literature “A Push for Inclusion: Human Rights and the Implications for Democracy” Caroline Mann Adviser: Philip Pettit, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Martha Groppo Department of Classics Department of History Alison Lo Daniel May Department of Psychology Department of Religion “Morality and Culture: Differences in American and Chinese Moral Reasoning” Joseph Naron Adviser: Deborah Prentice, Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School Department of Religion Lucia Rafanelli Department of Politics Being able to meet informally Gabrielle Speach with Professor Ryan and friendly Department of Politics Tacy Stephens VPL students to test my ideas and Department of English get their insightful observations Kim Worthington Department of History certainly made the thesis process much less daunting. — Mariana Olaizola ’13 TEACHING AND LEARNING 41

FILM FORUM Spring 2013

Film Forum The place where Princeton students, professors, and The Film Forum convenes under the direction of Erika Kiss at townspeople see and discuss great films Mondays the Rockefeller College Theater for a fi lm screening followed by at 7 p.m. comments from Princeton faculty and lively discussion. The series in Rocky Theater is supported by a gift from Bert Kerstetter ’66 and is co-sponsored by the University Center for Human Values and Rockefeller College.

Spring 2013 February 4 Hamlet (1948) by Laurence Olivier February 11 Touch of Evil (1958) by Orson Welles February 18 The Dancer Upstairs (2002) by John Malkovich Film Forum director Erika Kiss, February 25 University Center for Human Elevator to the Gallows (1957) by Louis Malle Values NOIR February 4 March 4 Laurence Olivier Tzameti (2005) by Géla Babluani Hamlet February 25 1948 Elevator to theLouis Gallows Malle

February 11 MatteoMarch Garrone 25 March 11 Orson Welles 1957 Touch of Evil Gomorrah The Conformist (1970) by Bernardo Bertolucci March 4 2008 Dibakar BanerjeeApril 15 1958 Géla Babluani 13 Tzameti Shanghai February 18 April 1 2012 John Malkovich 2005 Nimród Antal March 25 The Dancer Upstairs Kontroll Gomorrah (2008) by Matteo Garrone Bernardo BertolucciMarch 11 Park Chan-wookApril 22 2002 2005 The Conformist Oldboy April 8 2003 April 1 1970 The Man from London Béla Tarr Kontroll (2005) by Nimród Antal 2007 Thomas VinterbergApril 29 The Hunt April 8 2012 printed on recycled paper Produced by the Of ce of Communications | Copyright © 2013 The Man from London (2007) by Béla Tarr by The Trustees of Princeton University 350222-13 The events are made possible by the generous gift of Bert April 15 G. Kerstetter ’66 and are co-sponsored by the University Shanghai (2012) by Dibakar Banerjee Center for Human Values and Rockefeller College. April 22 Oldboy (2003) by Park Chan-wook April 29 The Hunt (2012) by Thomas Vinterberg 42 TEACHING AND LEARNING

Human Values Forum: Samuel Scheffler THE AFTERLIFE

By Max Siegel ’14, Philosophy

The Human Values Forum is a group of approximately 50 undergraduate Human Values Forum fellows who meet each week for dinner and discussion of issues in ethics and human values. Each dinner begins with an introduction by an invited With support from Bert Kerstetter ’66, the Human Values Forum speaker, who subsequently joins in the discussion. On March 11, the provides an opportunity for approximately 50 students and 15 faculty members to meet in an informal setting to discuss cur- forum was joined by Professor Samuel Scheffler, University Professor rent and enduring questions concerning ethics and human of Philosophy and Law at New York University. Scheffler spoke about values. They meet over dinner at 5 Ivy Lane most weeks during “The Afterlife,” his provocative argument about the implications of the academic year. humanity’s continued existence following our deaths. Scheffler argued that if humanity were to cease to exist shortly after our deaths, many of our Max Siegel ’14, President activities would lose their value. Scheffler’s introduction provoked a lively Ariel Futter ’15, Vice President of Programming discussion among undergraduates, graduate students, and three faculty Alex Brock ’14, Vice President of Forum Relations members affiliated with the UCHV: Michael Smith, Alan Ryan, and Marc September 24 Fleurbaey. As is common practice among HVF fellows, students continued “The Ethics of Eating Meat” to debate Scheffler’s position long after the conclusion of the dinner. Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values October 1 “The Future of Marriage” Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values October 8 “Washington and Westminster” Philip Pettit, Politics and University Center for Human Values October 15 “Intervention in Syria” Bernard Haykel, Near Eastern Studies October 17 “Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account” Christine Korsgaard, Harvard University, Philosophy October 22 “Wars of Lesser Aggression” Jefferson McMahan, Rutgers University, Philosophy November 5 “The Aesthetic Value of Weirdness” Students at the March 11 Human Values Forum P. Adams Sitney, Lewis Center for the Arts November 12 “Separation of Powers in Thought and Practice” Jeremy Waldron, New York University School of Law TEACHING AND LEARNING 43

Guest speaker Samuel Scheffler, New York University

February 11 “The Meaning of Life” Michael Rosen February 25 “The Museum and Citizenship” James Steward, Princeton University Art Museum March 4 “Presidential Bioethics Councils” Jason Schwartz, University Center for Human Values March 11 “The Afterlife” Samuel Scheffler, New York University, Philosophy March 25 “What Is Secularization?” November 16 Samuel Goldman, Religion “Self-Determination for National Minorities” Alan Patten, Politics and University Center for Human Values April 1 “Aristotle on the Difference between Opinion November 19 and Understanding” “The Ethics of Translation” Benjamin Morison, Philosophy Sandra Bermann, Comparative Literature April 8 November 26 “Patenting Genes” “Privacy and Information Technology Policy” Shirley M. Tilghman, Princeton University President and Edward Felten, Computer Science Molecular Biology December 3 April 14 “Moderate Governance and Liberal Democracy” “Identifying with the Enemy” Rahul Sagar, Politics Dennis Feeney, Classics December 10 April 22 “Personal Responsibility and Social Justice” “Does Moral Ignorance Exculpate?” Marc Fleurbaey, Woodrow Wilson School and University Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Center for Human Values Human Values January 7 April 29 “Religion and Human Rights” “Equality in the Workplace” Alison Boden, Office of Religious Life Anne-Marie Slaughter, Woodrow Wilson School February 4 May 6 “Moral Responsibility under Duress” “How Do We Create a Just Economy?” Gideon Rosen, Philosophy Jeffrey Stout, Religion LAURANCE S. ROCKEFELLER VISITING FACULTY FELLOWS RESEARCH REPORTS SUPPORTING RESEARCH

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013 46 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Faculty Fellows ADVANCING SCHOLARSHIP THROUGH COLLABORATION

The Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Faculty Fellows program annually attracts a select group of scholars from other universities to devote a year in residence at the University Center for Human Values to a research and writing project on a topic involving human values in public and private life. The program is one means by which the center seeks to advance scholarship in its areas of interest. While in Princeton, in addition to working on their research projects, the visiting fellows typically participate in a range of events on campus including lectures, seminars, and colloquia, and they frequently develop intellectual relationships with Princeton faculty members and graduate students. In these ways, the program enriches the life of the campus as well as supporting important research. A main feature of the fellows program is a regular lunch seminar at which our LSR fellows, the Visiting Professor of Distinguished Teaching, and postdoctoral researchers, together with the center’s faculty members present work in progress to an audience of peers. Usually a commentator

introduces the discussion. As the reports on the following pages attest, Above, visiting fellow Chris many find the criticism and discussion of their work in this forum to be Heathwood. Left, visiting fellows one of the most significant benefits of the fellowship. Michael Otsuka and Sonali Chakravarti. Below left, visiting fellows Kimberly Ferzan and Henry Richardson

The program is one means by which the center seeks to advance scholarship in its areas of interest. SUPPORTING RESEARCH 47

RESEARCH REPORTS

Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor Laurance S. Rockefeller for Distinguished Teaching Visiting Fellows

This professorship is part of the 250th Anniversary Visiting Professorships for These fellowships are awarded annually to outstanding scholars and teachers Distinguished Teaching program. Each faculty visitor teaches an undergrad- interested in devoting a year in residence at Princeton writing about ethics uate course and engages in other activities aimed at improving teaching and human values, discussing their work in a fellows seminar, and participat- at Princeton. ing in seminar activities. Peter Brooks Elizabeth Ashford Lecturer with the Rank of Professor in Lecturer in Philosophy at the Comparative Literature and the UCHV University of St. Andrews at Princeton and Sterling Professor of Comparative Literature Emeritus at Inspired by terrific feedback from Yale University other center fellows and faculty I designed and taught a new under- and the immensely stimulating and graduate course, “Clues, Evidence friendly atmosphere at Princeton, Detection: Law Stories,” which pairs I was able to complete four papers, legal and fictional texts, and will re- which discuss core arguments in peat next year because it seems to have the book I have been working on, met with student approval. I planned Severe Poverty as a Systemic Human Rights Violation. These papers are on the and held a symposium on “Teaching nature of the general positive duties of justice imposed by a general human Law and Humanities,” which brought right to subsistence; the nature of the negative duties this right imposes on together distinguished scholars inter- relatively affluent individuals and nations; a development of Henry Shue’s ested in interdisciplinary work between legal and liberal arts education. argument that the right to subsistence should be seen as a basic right; and I was a visiting lecturer at Boston University School of Law, and the lec- an account of an individualist utilitarian conception of human rights and tures I gave there will be published this summer in Boston University an argument for why there is convergence between such an account and Law Review as “Law and Humanities: Two Attempts.” I presented work a plausible Kantian account of rights over acknowledgment of a basic also at University of Virginia School of Law, at Georgetown Law Center, human right to subsistence. I was also able to produce a preliminary draft and at the Stanford University Center for the Study of the Novel. I co- of most of my book manuscript. organized the symposium, “Roman et Démocratie,” held at the Sorbonne Nouvelle in October 2012. I also continued work on a longstanding project, “Flaubert in the Ruins of Paris,” which considers that author in relation to the political realities and ideologies of his time. 48 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

RESEARCH REPORTS

Sonali Chakravarti the simple luxury of time to research, to think, to write, and to Assistant Professor of Government at rewrite (there is always too much rewriting) was invaluable. All in all, a Wesleyan University memorable and productive year and one for which I am very grateful. The center provided an ideal work environment for me. I completed a book Kimberly Kessler Ferzan manuscript, Sing the Rage: Listening to Professor of Law at Rutgers School of Law–Camden Anger after Mass Violence, and it is forth- My year at Princeton has been extraordinary. I have had the opportunity coming from the University of Chicago to work through a number of questions for my book, From Defense to Press. After receiving valuable feedback Detention, and this has resulted in a number of discrete articles includ- on the paper on the gacaca process in ing “Self-Defense and Forfeiture,” “The Bluff: The Power of Insincere Rwanda and jury nullification in the Actions,” and the completion of “Preventive Justice and the Presumption United States that I presented to the of Innocence.” I have had the opportunity UCHV community in December, I have to present my work at a number of ven- refined my interest in the role of lay peo- ues, further enhancing my thinking for ple in legal decision making and am close to completing an article on the the book: a précis of the book itself topic. My conversations with scholars at the University, the center, and was the basis of my keynote at the at conferences hosted here have prompted me to consider turning this Ontario Legal Philosophy Partnership interest into a book project on juries and citizenship. In addition, I wrote graduate student conference. I pre- a paper on a new topic, whistleblowers as political actors, and delivered sented “Self-Defense and Forfeiture” it at the Western Political Science Association conference in Los Angeles at the Bowling Green State University in March. Workshop in Applied Ethics; “The Dallas Denery Bluff ” at the UCHV fellows work- Associate Professor of History at shop, the Rutgers-Camden law school Bowdoin College faculty workshop, the Analytic Legal During these last 10 months, I have Philosophy Conference, and the managed to complete my second Penn Legal Theory Workshop; and book, now titled The Devil Wins: A an earlier piece, “Beyond Crime and History of Lying from the Garden of Commitment,” which won the American Philosophical Association’s Eden to the Enlightenment. I doubt I Berger Memorial Prize, at an APA Pacific Division panel. Finally, would have accomplished nearly so I organized a small group workshop on self-defense at Princeton. much had I spent my leave at my home institution. Conversations with Chris Heathwood other fellows, as well as Princeton Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado–Boulder faculty and graduate students, proved During my fellowship at the UCHV this academic year, I wrote a long a constant source of stimulation and paper in metaethics called “Irreducibly Normative Properties,” a version SUPPORTING RESEARCH 49

of which I presented at the Princeton in the book. I also prepared a talk on T. M. Scanlon, blame, and the re- Workshop in Normative Philosophy active attitudes, thinking about the relationship between individuals and in February. I completed drafts of two communities; this should become a third core chapter of the book. I am chapters for a book on wellbeing—one thus well placed to complete the manuscript next year. chapter on what I call the problem of remote desires and another on the Michael Otsuka question of which desires are relevant Professor of Philosophy at University College London to wellbeing. The former was the sub- During my year at the center, I wrote or completed four papers. The first ject of my UCHV lunchtime seminar paper, titled “Prioritarianism and the Measure of Utility,” was presented in February, and the latter was pre- for the Monday lunchtime seminar at the beginning of the fall semester sented at the Princeton Workshop on as well as to audiences at New York University, Rutgers University, the Wellbeing in May. At the start of the University of Maryland, and Duke academic year, I made final revisions University. The second paper is on a paper for The Cambridge Companion titled “How It Makes a Moral to Utilitarianism called “Subjective Theories of Well-Being.” I also complet- Difference that One Is Worse Off ed a paper for The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory called “Monism and than One Would Have Been.” In Pluralism about Value,” as well as a paper on desire theories of wellbeing writing this paper, I have greatly for a couple of introductory anthologies edited by Russ Shafer-Landau. benefited from fruitful exchanges with Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Bennett Helm Fleurbaey in the autumn and the Professor of Philosophy at Franklin & winter. The third paper is titled Marshall College “Risking Life and Limb: How to Discount Harms by Their Improbability.” My current research project is to write a I presented a version of this paper at the University of California– book, Defining Moral Communities. As this Riverside in January, and it is now under review for inclusion in a book is the first of two years on leave, I decided on identified and statistical lives for Oxford University Press. The fourth to spend a fair amount of time this year paper, titled “The Moral Responsibility Account of Liability to Defensive reading background literature in political Killing,” was written for a conference at Bowling Green State University philosophy and trust, areas about which and was presented at a workshop on self-defense at Princeton in February. I was largely ignorant but realized are im- I’ve also learned a great deal from the steady flow of lectures, conferences, portant. This enabled me to reframe the and seminars that I have attended, which have planted the seeds of ideas book project as being about the essential for future papers. In addition, I’ve enjoyed the chance to meet up and relationship between persons and com- discuss work of mutual interest with members of the Princeton community munities. In the process, I wrote two self-standing articles, both of which in the highly congenial research environment the UCHV provides its are committed for publication: “Trust as a Reactive Attitude” and “Being visiting fellows. Bound to Communal Norms”; each of these will become a core chapter 50 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

RESEARCH REPORTS

Henry Richardson Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Research Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University Associate in Bioethics

Having had contact with the UCHV’s The Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Fellowship in Bioethics supports outstand- affiliated faculty, fellows, and general ing scholars studying ethical issues arising from developments in medicine or environment has greatly enhanced my the biological sciences. The Shapiro Fellow spends from one to three years at work this year on my book project, Princeton conducting research and teaching one course each year. Articulating the Moral Community. I have Jason Schwartz largely drafted two completely new chapters as well as the introduction The first year of my fellowship was to the book, and have begun the less extremely enjoyable and productive. philosophically demanding task of My primary research project examined converting existing articles into chapters. how the risks and benefits of medical I have also seen the need to add one or interventions are framed, discussed, and two additional chapters, beyond what I had projected. In addition, the year evaluated by policymakers, technical has also enabled me to give a good number of presentations, including three experts, and patients, paying particular at Princeton; to revise a number of other articles; and to write an author- attention to the role of values and value meets-critics comment on Paul Weithman’s Why Political Liberalism? judgments in these deliberations and their translation into public health policy Alex Voorhoeve Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the London School of Economics and practice. I presented a paper on this work at the LSR seminar, and I made I’ve worked this year on topics in substantial progress throughout the year distributive ethics, mostly in close on several other papers that consider the interconnected historical, ethical, collaboration with Michael Otsuka (also a and policy aspects of this topic. In the spring, I taught an undergraduate UCHV fellow) and Marc Fleurbaey. This seminar, “Ethics and Public Health,” and organized the DeCamp Bioethics resulted in two papers (one under review, Seminars. Other highlights of the year included presentations to the Values one nearly finished), a critical notice in and Public Life students and the Human Values Forum; guest lectures Economics and Philosophy, and an extended in various courses at Princeton and elsewhere; the enlightening talks book review in Social Choice and Welfare, sponsored by the UCHV and other departments; and many conversations all on related topics. I’ve also attended with the remarkable community of scholars at Princeton with interests graduate seminars on consequentialism and expertise in issues related to values, health, and society. and on health and development and given guest lectures in several courses at Princeton, as well as speaking at around 10 universities or research institutes around the country on my research. SUPPORTING RESEARCH 51

Values and Public Policy Postdoctoral Simon Cotton Research Associates This year provided an invaluable opportunity to deepen my perspective on foun- The Values and Public Policy Postdoctoral Fellowship is a joint endeavor of dational concepts that are central to my the University Center for Human Values and the Woodrow Wilson School of long-term project. I am in the process of Public and International Affairs and supports highly promising scholars trained developing an account of global justice in moral and political philosophy, political theory, normative economics, and related areas to develop a research agenda in the ethical dimensions of under which the mere fact of globalization public policy. (involving consensual and mutually beneficial relations across borders and between Mark Alfano states) provides a basis for egalitarian dis- The 2012–13 academic year has been quite productive for me, thanks tributive requirements. Concepts such as to the dedicated research time and budget furnished by my postdoc at exploitation, domination, and unfair play Princeton. I finalized my first monograph, Character as Moral Fiction are thereby central. I wrote one paper, (Cambridge University Press), which was published in the United States currently under review, on nondomina- in April 2013. I completed a draft of a monograph on Nietzsche’s moral tion and distributive justice, which I presented at the University of North psychology, which is under review with Cambridge. I wrote a long and Carolina and University College London, as well as in the LSR seminar. I ambitious programmatic article, “Some Normative Implications of also began work on two additional papers: one arguing that exploitation the Instability and Indeterminacy of is irreducible to pre-existing injustice, and another offering a hypotheti- Preferences,” which I presented to cal consent interpretation of fair play. Above all, I benefited enormously the UCHV, the Center for Health and from my colleagues, particularly in the LSR seminar, international rela- Wellbeing, and the Neuroscience of tions colloquium, and Alan Patten’s seminar on distributive justice. Decision Making lab sponsored by the Department of Psychology. Other pub- lications made possible by my postdoc include one edited volume (a special edition of The Monist on virtues), four peer-reviewed articles, seven chapters in edited volumes, an entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and a book review. I also presented my research at five conferences and five invited lectures. 52 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

RESEARCH REPORTS

Graduate Prize Fellows, 2012–13 Religion and the Christian Democracy Workshop hosted by the UCHV. These fellowships, made possible by a gift from Laurance S. Rockefeller ’32, I could not have finished my degree this year (my fourth) if not for the are awarded to Princeton graduate students with distinguished academic records who show great promise of contributing to scholarship and teach- UCHV’s Graduate Prize Fellowship. ing about ethics and human values. The fellowship program is directed by Henry Cowles Anthony Appiah and Philip Pettit. My year as a Graduate Prize Fellow in the UCHV has been a productive Yael Berda one on a number of levels. At the most basic level, the fellowship has given me the opportunity to dedicate time to my writing. That has resulted During my sojourn at the UCHV as a Graduate Prize Fellow, I have been in the completion of one chapter and headway on another, for which my able to benefit from the scholarly debate of the seminar and the rigorous committee and I are grateful. Of course, that new work has benefited writing environment. I presented my work to the group in October, and from interaction with the other fellows. In particular, the chance to pres- as a consequence had a full draft of my theoretical chapter, which I have ent an overview of my project to the group forced me to pitch it at a new since revised according to the useful comments I received from fellows level that will be helpful as I prepare to go on the job market next year. across the disciplines. Since then, I have written two chapters for my dis- Last, but certainly not least, this year’s ongoing conversation has helped sertation using archive materials. This significant progress will enable me me recast my own engagement with the fields represented by my peers in to finish the dissertation by the end of 2013. Other accomplishments this the program. For that, and for everything else, I am grateful. year: I have submitted another article for publication and received the Reinhardt Bendix Award for Best Graduate Student Paper in Comparative Anthony Cross Historical Sociology from the American Sociological Association. I have I am immensely grateful to the UCHV for what has been a productive also been working on a proposal to translate my book The Bureaucracy of the year of research and writing, during which I’ve completed drafts of two Occupation, which I have sent out to a couple of major university publish- chapters of my dissertation in addition to several independent papers ers. I worked daily at my office at 5 Ivy Lane and was greatly motivated by for conference presentation and submission to journals. I presented an conversations and interaction with the other GPF fellows. early draft of the second of these two chapters at a spring meeting of Joseph Clair the UCHV’s Graduate Prize Fellows seminar. This chapter, titled “The Importance of Artistic Value,” advances a theory of artistic value—the The Graduate Prize Fellowship has been a joy, and I am grateful for the value of a work of art qua art—while at the same time questioning the opportunities it has provided me to learn and to present my own work in centrality of this kind of value in relationships of valuing particular works the company of such smart and generous colleagues. Perhaps most impor- of art. I received excellent feedback, and greatly enjoyed the opportunity tantly the fellowship provided with me the time (and space at 5 Ivy Lane) to present my work to an audience of diverse disciplinary perspectives. to complete my final three dissertation chapters. I also spent a good part More generally, I greatly valued my time with the other graduate fellows of the year working on job applications. I just accepted a twofold position and with Professors Appiah and Pettit; the seminars and subsequent at George Fox University: director of the William Penn Honors Program dinners were remarkable in both their wide-ranging scope and in their and assistant professor of religious studies. During this academic year, I friendly, collegial atmosphere. also published an article in the peer-reviewed Journal of Religious Ethics and presented papers at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of SUPPORTING RESEARCH 53

Top row, from left, Graduate Prize Fellows Joseph Clair and Yael Berda; Professor Kwame Anthony Appiah, philosophy and University Center for Human Values; and Graduate Prize Fellow Eden Lin. Bottom row, Graduate Prize Fellows Matt McCoy; Avani Mehta Sood; Chris Ro; Sarit Kattan Gribetz; Kelly Swartz; Henry Cowles; Anthony Cross

Sarit Kattan Gribetz I devoted most of my year to writing my dissertation, which examines ways During the year, I presented parts of my research at several national con- in which ancient Jewish communities constructed their religious identities ferences, and I organized two conferences at Princeton. After I defend through the structuring of daily time, especially in relation to neighboring my dissertation this summer, I will hold postdoctoral fellowships at the communities within the Roman Empire. Presenting my work in the fall to Jewish Theological Seminary and at Harvard University, after which I will the Graduate Prize Fellows allowed me to develop a broader framework begin a tenure-track position as an assistant professor of classical and me- for the dissertation as a whole and to think about how to access a commu- dieval Judaism at Fordham University. I could not have imagined a more nity’s underlying values through analyzing the ways its members use their supportive, inspiring, and intellectually engaging graduate experience than time. I was also able to develop one section of the dissertation as an article the one I have received at Princeton, and I am indebted to the UCHV for that has been accepted for publication by the Journal of Ancient Judaism. welcoming me so warmly during this last year of research and writing. 54 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

RESEARCH REPORTS

Eden Lin Avani Mehta Sood I have been very productive academically during my time as a Graduate I am very grateful to have been a UCHV Graduate Prize Fellow this year. Prize Fellow. I have accomplished three major goals relating to my re- The fellowship enabled me to successfully complete my dissertation, search: I finalized the first chapter of my dissertation, which I then used as which applied the psychological theory of motivated cognition to explain my writing sample when applying for academic jobs; I produced a detailed and address the ways in which people make judgments in two charged outline of the second chapter of my dissertation, which was the basis for areas of criminal law: the use of “harm” as a dividing line between law my job talk; and I wrote the third and final chapter of my dissertation. A and morality, and the suppression of “tainted” evidence obtained through version of this chapter already existed, but I have completely rewritten it. illegal police searches. Using experimental methodologies, I demonstrated It is a much stronger piece of work now. Additionally, I found success on that when people’s intuitions about the “right” outcome in a case clash the academic job market: I have accepted a tenure-track position in the with the requirements of a legal rule, they less-than-consciously engage in Department of Philosophy at Rutgers University in Newark. motivated construal of “facts” to achieve their desired outcomes ostensibly within the terms of the given law. I analyzed the legal consequences of Matt McCoy this psychological phenomenon and provided evidence for a proposed This year has been a productive one for me. I’ve been able to write, present, remedy. I very much enjoyed the forum that the UCHV Graduate Prize and revise two draft dissertation chapters. Given that I’m also still doing a Fellowship provided to engage with graduate students across other substantial amount of dissertation-related reading and research, it’s unlike- departments who are conducting research relating to the study of human ly that I would have accomplished so much had I been teaching this year. values. I learned a tremendous amount from the presentations of the The Graduate Prize Fellow seminar gave me a great opportunity to receive other fellows, and appreciated getting their intellectually diverse feedback on my work from a diverse group of scholars. Their questions perspectives on my work. and comments helped me see strengths and weaknesses in my work that I hadn’t previously appreciated. I also got quite a bit out of the Graduate Kelly Swartz Prize Fellow dinners. Talking about my research in an informal setting with In the summer and fall of 2012, I researched and wrote the first chapter graduate students from other departments has helped me clarify my ques- of my dissertation, completed in January. In it, I analyze Francis Bacon’s tions and my ideas and, most importantly, has helped me to explain why my aphoristic theory and practice within the context of early modern moral project might be of interest to those outside of my discipline. and natural philosophy. I have since begun work on my second chapter, in which I argue for the importance of the Baconian aphorism to our Christopher Ro understanding of the moral, political, and aesthetic ambitions of much As a Graduate Prize Fellow for the 2012–13 academic year, I completed late 17th- and early 18th-century English satire. I have presented portions two drafts of what will become two core chapters of my dissertation. of this second chapter as part of the English department’s Works-in- Thanks to the generous fellowship, I was able to wholly devote my time Progress series and at the annual meeting of the American Comparative to working on my research and made substantial progress on my examina- Literature Association. I am immensely grateful for the support of tion of Karl Marx’s idea of freedom. In particular, I progressed on my the Graduate Prize Fellowship this year, and for the many invaluable research on Marx’s idea of impersonal domination and on why Marx re- conversations I enjoyed. jected the market. I presented a paper on the former in the Graduate Prize Fellows seminar and received very helpful feedback from my colleagues, which has considerably improved my thinking on the topic. I enjoyed the meetings and learned a lot from the other fellows and the faculty. SUPPORTING RESEARCH 55

I learned much from the

Clockwise, from above: the February 11 LSR fellows lunch conversations we all had, formal seminar; Graduate Prize Fellow Henry Cowles and and informal. While I hope in the visiting lecturer Jonathan Spence, Yale University; years ahead to participate in many and postdoctoral research associate Simon Cotton more such lively seminars, I believe this year’s experience will remain exceptional. I’m very grateful to have had it. – Kelly Swartz, Graduate Prize Fellow FACULTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE LAURANCE S. ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY PRECEPTOR FACULTY ASSOCIATES ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF PEOPLE

ANNUAL REVIEW 2013

Te strumquam, officti occus, sit eum eparita qui omnietu nuscid ex ectet de paritae voluptatem volupt sit eum sit eum ex ectet de paritae ex ectet. 58 TEACHING AND LEARNING

people

Ftacul y Philip Pettit Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and Kwame Anthony Appiah the University Center for Human Values Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Human Values Kim Lane Scheppele Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and Charles Beitz International Affairs and the University Center for Human Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Values Sanford Professor of Politics Peter Singer Peter Brooks Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in the University Center Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor of Distinguished for Human Values Teaching; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Scholar Christopher L. Eisgruber Executive Committee Provost and Princeton University President (beginning July 1, 2013); Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Public Affairs in Kwame Anthony Appiah the Woodrow Wilson School and the University Center for Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy Human Values and the University Center for Human Values Marc Fleurbaey Charles Beitz Robert E. Kuenne Professor of Economics and Humanistic Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Studies; Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center Sanford Professor of Politics for Human Values Sandra Bermann Elizabeth Harman Cotsen Professor of the Humanities; Professor of Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center Comparative Literature for Human Values John Cooper Nannerl Keohane Henry Putnam University Professor of Philosophy Laurance S. Rockefeller Distinguished Visiting Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center for Human Values Marc Fleurbaey Robert E. Kuenne Professor of Economics and Humanistic Erika Kiss Studies; Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center Director, UCHV Film Forum; Associate Research Scholar in for Human Values the University Center for Human Values Eric Gregory Stephen Macedo Professor of Religion Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values Elizabeth Harman Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center Victoria McGeer for Human Values Research Scholar, University Center for Human Values Melissa Lane Alan Patten Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Professor of Acting Director, University Center for Human Values; Politics Professor of Politics TEACHING AND LEARNING 59

Stephen Macedo Ftacul y Associates Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values Elizabeth Armstrong Associate Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Jan-Werner Mueller Woodrow Wilson School Professor of Politics Leora Batnitzky Alan Patten Professor of Religion Acting Director, University Center for Human Values; Professor of Politics João Biehl Susan Dod Brown Professor of Anthropology Philip Pettit Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and Angus Deaton the University Center for Human Values Dwight D. Eisenhower Professor of International Affairs; Professor of Economics and International Affairs, Kim Lane Scheppele Woodrow Wilson School Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs and the University Center for Paul DiMaggio Human Values A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Peter Singer Mitchell Duneier Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in the University Center Maurice P. During Professor of Sociology for Human Values Caryl Emerson Michael Smith A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Slavic Languages McCosh Professor of Philosophy and Literatures; Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures and Comparative Literature Laurance S. Rockefeller Susan Fiske University Preceptor Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology and Public Affairs Daniel Garber Sarah McGrath Stuart Professor of Philosophy Assistant Professor of Philosophy Sophie Gee Associate Professor of English Robert George McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence; Professor of Politics Eddie Glaude Jr. William S. Tod Professor of Religion and African American Studies 60 TEACHING AND LEARNING

people

Gilbert Harman Serguei Oushakine James S. McDonnell Distinguished University Professor Associate Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures of Philosophy Devah Pager Hendrik Hartog Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty; Professor of History Deborah Prentice Alexander Stewart 1886 Professor of Psychology and Mark Johnston Public Affairs Walter Cerf *41 Professor of Philosophy Albert Raboteau Thomas Kelly Henry W. Putnam Professor of Religion Professor of Philosophy Daniel Rodgers Robert Keohane Henry Charles Lea Professor of History Professor of Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Gideon Rosen Stuart Professor of Philosophy David Leheny Henry Wendt III ’55 Professor of East Asian Studies Rahul Sagar Assistant Professor of Politics Thomas Leonard Research Scholar in the Council of the Humanities; Lecturer Harold T. Shapiro in Economics President of the University Emeritus; Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Douglas Massey Henry G. Bryant Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Anne-Marie Slaughter Woodrow Wilson School Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Sarah McGrath Assistant Professor of Philosophy; Laurance S. Rockefeller Anna Stilz University Preceptor Assistant Professor of Politics; Arthur H. Scribner Bicentennial Preceptor Alexander Nehamas Edmund N. Carpenter II Class of 1943 Professor Jeffrey Stout in the Humanities; Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Religion Comparative Literature Maurizio Viroli Guy Nordenson Professor of Politics Professor of Architecture Michael Wood Jeff Nunokawa Charles Barnwell Straut Class of 1923 Professor of English and Professor of English Comparative Literature Joyce Carol Oates Robert Wuthnow Roger S. Berlind ’52 Professor of the Humanities; Professor of Gerhard R. Andlinger ’52 Professor of Social Sciences; Creative Writing in the Lewis Center for the Arts Professor of Sociology TEACHING AND LEARNING 61

Advisory Council Staff Danielle Allen ’93 Charles Beitz UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science, Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Institute for Advanced Study Sanford Professor of Politics Ezekiel Emanuel Alan Patten Diane v.S. Levy and Robert M. Levy University Professor, Acting Director, University Center for Human Values; Vice Provost for Global Initiatives and Chair, Department of Professor of Politics Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Melissa Lane Bert Kerstetter ’66 Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Professor President, Everfast, Inc. of Politics Katherine Marshall MPA ’69 Alan Ryan Senior Fellow and Visiting Professor, Berkley Center, Acting Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Lecturer Georgetown University with the Rank of Professor in Politics Mark Rockefeller ’89 Erum Syed Founder and CEO, Rockefeller Consulting; Vice Chairman, Assistant Director (through May 2013) Rockefeller Financial Maureen Killeen Debra Satz Assistant Director (from June 2013) Marta Sutton Weeks Professor of Ethics in Society; Senior Associate Dean for the Humanities and Arts; and Faculty Erin Graham Director, Bowen H. McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Program Coordinator Society, Stanford University Susan Winters Richard L. Smith ’70 Administrative Assistant Principal, Bay Resource Corporation Kimberly Girman Dennis F. Thompson Staff Assistant Alfred North Whitehead Professor of Political Philosophy, Department of Government and John F. Kennedy School of Andrew Perhac Government, Harvard University Computer Support Specialist

University Center for Human Values Princeton University Annual Review 2013