DOCSLIB.ORG

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc Annual Report 2012 Annual Report Plc Holdings Rolls-Royce Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc Annual Report 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc Annual Report 2012 Annual Report Plc Holdings Rolls-Royce Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc Annual Report 2012 Rolls-Royce Holdings plc report annual 2012 Rolls-Royce Holdings plc annual report 2012 ® ® © Rolls-Royce plc 2013 Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Registered office: 65 Buckingham Gate London SW1E 6AT T +44 (0)20 7222 9020 www.rolls-royce.com Company number 7524813 WorldReginfo - aea8a40a-4321-4974-a880-adb5991b762f 133 Glossary Business review ABC Anti-bribery and corruption IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards Introduction 01 ACARE Advisory Council for Aviation Research and ISO International Standards Organisation Group at a glance 02 Innovation in Europe LDI Liability-driven investment Chairman’s statement 04 ADR American Depositary Receipts Programme LIBOR London Inter-Bank Offered Rate Chief Executive’s review 06 AEBS All-Employee Bonus Scheme LLP Limited Liability Partnership Values, vision and strategy 08 AGM Annual general meeting LTSA Long-Term Service Agreement Future opportunity 10 ANA All Nippon Airways LNG Liquefied Natural Gas Chief Financial Officer’s review 12 APB Auditing Practices Board MoD UK Ministry of Defence Key performance indicators 16 APRA Annual Performance Related Award plan MW Megawatt Principal risks and uncertainties 18 BIS Department for Business, Innovation and Skills NCI Non-controlling interest Civil aerospace 20 CAD Canadian dollar NO Nitrogen oxides Defence aerospace 22 X CBE Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire OCI Other comprehensive income Marine 24 Energy 26 CDP Carbon Disclosure Project OE Original Equipment Excellence in technology 28 CGU Cash-generating unit OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Excellence in operations 30 CO2 Carbon dioxide Sustainability 32 CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent OHSAS Occupational Health and Safety Advisory Services Additional financial information 37 CPS Cash flow per share OTC Over-the-counter CRIP C Share Reinvestment Plan PAC Political Action Committee Governance DJSI Dow Jones Sustainability World and European Indexes PLC Public Limited Company Chairman’s introduction 39 DoD US Department of Defense PSP Performance Share Plan Board of directors 40 EMIR European Market Infrastructure Regulation R&D Research and development International Advisory Board (IAB) 42 EPS Earnings per ordinary share RCF Revolving credit facility The Group Leadership Team (GLT) 42 ESOP Executive Share Option Plan REACH Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals Corporate governance report 43 EU European Union Registrar Computershare Investor Services PLC Audit committee report 47 FAA Federal Aviation Administration RRNA Rolls-Royce North America Nomination committee report 49 Frc Financial Risk Committee RRSPs Risk and Revenue Sharing Partnerships Ethics committee report 50 FRC Financial Reporting Council RSUs Restricted stock units Risk committee report 52 FSA Financial Services Authority SCRIA Supply Chain Relationships in Aerospace Safety committee report 53 Remuneration committee report 54 GBP Great British pound or pound sterling SDSR Strategic Defence and Security Review Directors’ remuneration report 57 GDP Gross Domestic Product SFO Serious Fraud Office Shareholders and share capital 68 GHG Greenhouse gas SIP Share Incentive Plan Other statutory information 70 GLT Group Leadership Team SRN Shareholder Reference Number HS&E Health, Safety and Environment STEM Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Financial statements I&C Instrumentation and control STOVL Short take-off and vertical landing Contents 73 IAB International Advisory Board TRI Total reportable injuries IAE IAE International Aero Engines AG TSR Total Shareholder Return Other information IAS International Accounting Standards UAV Unmanned aerial vehicle Subsidiaries, jointly controlled IASB International Accounting Standards Board UK GAAP UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practices entities and associates 126 IFRIC International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee USD United States dollar Independent Auditor’s report 129 Group five-year review 130 Shareholder information 131 Glossary 133 Directors’ report The directors’ report which includes the Business review is set out on pages 1 to 72. Forward-looking statements This annual report contains forward-looking statements. Any statements that express forecasts, expectations and projections are not guarantees of future performance and will not be updated. By their nature, these statements involve risk and uncertainty, and a number of factors could cause material differences to the actual results or developments. Designed and produced by Printed in the UK by PurePrint using their This report is intended to provide information to CONRAN DESIGN GROUP and environmental printing technology, using shareholders, is not designed to be relied upon by any other vegetable inks throughout. PurePrint is a CarbonNeutral® party, or for any other purpose and the Company and its The paper used in the report contains 75% recycled company. Both the paper manufacturing mill and the printer directors accept no liability to any other person other than content, of which 75% is de-inked post-consumer. are registered to the Environmental Management System under English law. All of the pulp is bleached using an elemental chlorine ISO 14001 and are Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) free process (ECF). chain-of-custody certified. Cover: In February 2012, we celebrated the opening of our new manufacturing and assembly facility in Singapore for large civil aero engines. Image courtesy of: Bob Lee Keng Siang WorldReginfo - aea8a40a-4321-4974-a880-adb5991b762f Introduction “In the full year, underlying profits increased for the tenth consecutive year. We have established this record of consistent delivery while continuing to invest in people, technology and facilities.” John Rishton, Chief Executive Rolls-Royce is a global company, providing integrated power solutions for customers in civil and defence aerospace, marine and energy markets. We support our customers through a worldwide network of offices, manufacturing and service facilities. 2012 2011 % change Order book – firm and announced £60,146m £57,630m** +4% Underlying revenue* £12,209m £11,277m +8% Profit before financing £2,072m £1,189m +74% Underlying profit before tax* £1,429m £1,157m +24% Underlying earnings per ordinary share* 59.27p 48.54p +22% Payments to shareholders 19.5p 17.50p +11% * See explanation in note 2 on page 86 ** Restated 2011 year-end data excluding International Aero Engines (IAE) order book of £4,571 million WorldReginfo - aea8a40a-4321-4974-a880-adb5991b762f 2 Business review Group at a glance The priorities of the Group remain: deliver on the promises we have made; decide where to grow and where not to; and improve financial performance. Civil aerospace Defence aerospace £6,437m £727m £2,417m £404m Underlying revenue 2012 Underlying profit 2012 Underlying revenue 2012 Underlying profit 2012 Trent XWB achieved certification Over US$1 billion in contracts from US DoD and UK MoD Trent 1000-TEN introduced US$315 million contract for F-35B STOVL LiftSystems™ BR725 enters service and IAE restructure completed Adour engines ordered by Royal Saudi Air Force for Hawks The Civil aerospace business is a major manufacturer of Rolls-Royce is the second largest provider of defence aero engines for the airline and corporate jet market. aero-engine products and services globally with 18,000 Rolls-Royce powers more than 30 types of commercial engines in service with 160 customers in 103 countries. aircraft and over 12,500 engines are in service with customers around the world. Revenue mix Revenue mix 46% OE revenue 46% OE revenue 54% Services revenue 49% Services revenue 5% Development R olls-Royce Holdings plc annual report 2012 WorldReginfo - aea8a40a-4321-4974-a880-adb5991b762f 3 Business review Group overview 2012 2012 revenue by business segment • The order book increased to £60.1 billion, 53% Civil aerospace up four per cent, adjusted for the IAE disposal. 20% Defence aerospace Order intake was £16.1 billion in the year. 8% Energy Business review • Underlying revenue increased eight per cent to 18% Marine £12.2 billion, including 12 per cent growth in 1% Engine Holding original equipment (OE) revenue and five per cent growth in underlying services revenue. • Underlying services revenue increased in all four business segments: Civil, Defence, Marine and Energy and, in Engine Holding. • Underlying profit before tax increased 24 per cent to £1,429 million reflecting revenue growth, revenue mix, unit cost reduction, a contribution from Tognum and IAE restructuring. Marine Energy £2,249m £294m £962m £21m Underlying revenue 2012 Underlying profit 2012 Underlying revenue 2012 Underlying profit 2012 £147 million orders from Brazil for drill ships and Six RB211s ordered by PetroChina for pipeline project offshore vessels Services grew and investment 24/7 support MT7 chosen to power US Navy future hovercraft desk completed £1.1 billion order for UK naval nuclear reactor Nuclear agreements signed with AREVA and Hitachi core programme With over 4,800 gas turbines sold, and more than Rolls-Royce has a world-leading range of capabilities in 130 million hours of operating experience gained, the marine market, encompassing the design, supply and our Energy business plays a critical role in supporting support of power and propulsion systems. We provide global infrastructure. Our technology powers offshore comprehensive through-life support from a global platforms, transports oil and gas through pipelines and network of service facilities. generates dependable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robust Gas Turbine and Airframe System Design in Light of Uncertain
    Robust Gas Turbine and Airframe System Design in Light of Uncertain Fuel and CO2 Prices Stephan Langmaak1, James Scanlan2, and András Sóbester3 University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7QF, United Kingdom This paper presents a study that numerically investigated which cruise speed the next generation of short-haul aircraft with 150 seats should y at and whether a con- ventional two- or three-shaft turbofan, a geared turbofan, a turboprop, or an open rotor should be employed in order to make the aircraft's direct operating cost robust to uncertain fuel and carbon (CO2) prices in the Year 2030, taking the aircraft pro- ductivity, the passenger value of time, and the modal shift into account. To answer this question, an optimization loop was set up in MATLAB consisting of nine modules covering gas turbine and airframe design and performance, ight and aircraft eet sim- ulation, operating cost, and optimization. If the passenger value of time is included, the most robust aircraft design is powered by geared turbofan engines and cruises at Mach 0.80. If the value of time is ignored, however, then a turboprop aircraft ying at Mach 0.70 is the optimum solution. This demonstrates that the most fuel-ecient option, the open rotor, is not automatically the most cost-ecient solution because of the relatively high engine and airframe costs. 1 Research Engineer, Computational Engineering and Design 2 Professor of Aerospace Design, Computational Engineering and Design, AIAA member 3 Associate Professor in Aircraft Engineering, Computational Engineering and Design, AIAA member 1 I. Introduction A. Background IT takes around 5 years to develop a gas turbine engine, which then usually remains in pro- duction for more than two decades [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • NPA 2018-13 Table of Contents
    European Aviation Safety Agency Notice of Proposed Amendment 2018-13 Appendix I to AMC to Annex III (Part-66) Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licences RMT.0541 (66.024) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) addresses a regulatory coordination issue related to aircraft type ratings. According to the AMC to Annex III (Part-66), type ratings should be endorsed on an aircraft maintenance licence (AML) in accordance with Appendix I to AMC to Part-66 ‘List of type ratings’. An NPA is issued regularly to amend this list, after assessing feedback received from the industry, and to add new aircraft types or to remove aircraft types whose type certificate (TC) has been revoked or surrendered. This NPA adds also the tables of the new Group as a consequence of the introduction of the ‘L’ licence subcategories by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1142. The main objective is to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. Action area: Regular updates/review of rules Affected rules: AMC/GM to Annex III (Part-66) to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 Affected stakeholders: Maintenance certifying staff; maintenance training organisations; maintenance organisations; competent authorities Driver: Efficiency/proportionality Rulemaking group: No Impact assessment: None Rulemaking Procedure: Standard 12.5.2009 5.12.2018 2019/Q2 TE.RPRO.00034-008 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO 9001 certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA intranet/internet. Page 1 of 186 An agency of the European Union European Aviation Safety Agency NPA 2018-13 Table of contents Table of contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • International Aero Engines V2500-A1, V2522-A5
    Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 225 / Tuesday, November 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 71373 under the criteria of the Regulatory (i) For TAE 125–01 engines, Operation & DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Flexibility Act. Maintenance Manual OM–01–02, Issue 3, We prepared a regulatory evaluation Revision 13. Federal Aviation Administration of the estimated costs to comply with (ii) For TAE 125–02–99 and TAE 125–02– this proposed AD and placed it in the 114 engines, Operation & Maintenance 14 CFR Part 39 AD docket. Manual OM–02–02, Issue 1, Revision 10. [Docket No. FAA–2010–0494; Directorate List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Prohibition of FADEC Software Earlier Identifier 2010–NE–20–AD] Versions Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (f) Once FADEC software version 2.91 is RIN 2120–AA64 safety, Safety. installed, do not install any earlier version of Airworthiness Directives; International FADEC software. The Proposed Amendment Aero Engines V2500–A1, V2522–A5, Accordingly, under the authority FAA AD Differences V2524–A5, V2525–D5, V2527–A5, delegated to me by the Administrator, (g) EASA AD 2010–0137 permits V2527E–A5, V2527M–A5, V2528–D5, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part installation of earlier FADEC software V2530–A5, and V2533–A5 Turbofan 39 as follows: versions, once version 2.91 is installed. This Engines AD does not. AGENCY: Federal Aviation PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (h) EASA AD 2010–0137 requires Administration (FAA), DOT. DIRECTIVES compliance within 110 flight hours after the effective date of the AD or during next ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 1. The authority citation for part 39 maintenance, whichever occurs first, but no (NPRM).
    [Show full text]
  • Teamwork and Technology
    Rolls-Royce Group plc plc Group Rolls-Royce TeAmwork And Technology Rolls-Royce Group plc Annual report 2010 report Annual Annual report 2010 © Rolls-Royce plc 2011 Rolls-Royce Group plc Registered office: 65 Buckingham Gate London SW1E 6AT T +44 (0)20 7222 9020 www.rolls-royce.com Company number 4706930 Trusted to deliver excellence BUSIneSS reVIEW goVernAnce Directors’ report responsibility or liability is expressly The directors present the Annual disclaimed. This Annual report 01 Introduction and 56 Chairman’s introduction report for the year ended december contains certain forward-looking highlights 56 Board of directors 31, 2010 which includes the business statements. These forward-looking review, governance report and statements can be identified by the 02 Chairman’s statement 58 The Group Executive audited financial statements for the fact that they do not relate only to 04 Chief Executive’s review 58 The International year. references to ‘rolls-royce’, the historical or current facts. In 08 Our consistent strategy Advisory Board ‘group’, the ‘company’, ‘we’, or ‘our’ are particular, all statements that express to rolls-royce group plc and/or its forecasts, expectations and 20 Market outlook 59 Governance structure subsidiaries, or any of them as the projections with respect to future 22 Key performance 62 Audit committee report context may require. Pages 01 to 82, matters, including trends in results of indicators 63 Nominations committee inclusive, of this Annual report operations, margins, growth rates, comprise a directors’
    [Show full text]
  • ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics
    National Research University Higher School of Economics Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning: Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Strategic and Marketing Analytics [email protected] [email protected] XIX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development Moscow, 11 April 2018 Outline - Role of artificial intelligence and big data in modern analytics - System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA - Combined quantitative and qualitative analysis methodology and software solutions - Use cases - Conclusion and discussion 2 Growing interest in Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Machine Learning International analytical reports & news feed 12000 10000 8000 Artificial Intelligence 6000 Big Data Machine Learning 4000 2000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Russian analytical reports & news feed 800 700 600 500 Artificial Intelligence 400 Big Data 300 Machine Learning 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 3 Source: System of Intelligent Foresight Analytics iFORA™ (ISSEK HSE) Role of Big Data Augmented Horizon Scanning in Strategic and Marketing Analytics AI-related tasks Tracking latest and challenges trends, technologies, drivers, barriers Market forecasting Trend analysis Understanding S&T modern skills and Instruments for Customers Market Intelligence competences analysis feedback knowledge discovery HR policy Vacancy Feedback mining
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted to Deliver Excellence Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc Annual
    Rolls-Royce Holdings plc plc Holdings Rolls-Royce Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Annual report 2011 Trusted to deliver excellence Annual reportAnnual 2011 ® ® © Rolls-Royce plc 2012 Trusted to deliver excellence deliver to Trusted Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Registered office: 65 Buckingham Gate London SW1E 6AT T +44 (0)20 7222 9020 www.rolls-royce.com Company number 7524813 129 Glossary Contents Glossary Business review ABC Anti-bribery and corruption IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards Civil aerospace Defence aerospace 1 Introduction ABI Association of British Insurers INVENT Integrated Vehicle Energy Technology 2 Chairman’s statement 4 Chief Executive’s review ACARE Advisory Council for Aviation Research and IPTMSD Integrated Power and Thermal Management System Development 6 Our business model and strategy Innovation in Europe ISO International Standards Organisation 8 Our business segments ADR American Depositary Receipts Programme LDI Liability-driven investment 9 Market opportunities ADVENT Adaptive Versatile Engine Technology LIBOR London Inter-bank Offered Rate 10 Key performance indicators AEBS All-Employee Bonus Scheme 14 Finance Director’s review LLP Limited Liability Partnership 18 Civil aerospace AFRL US Air Force Research Lab LTSA Long-Term Service Agreement 20 Defence aerospace AGM Annual General Meeting MoD UK Ministry of Defence 22 Marine p18 p20 ANA All Nippon Airways MoU Memorandum of Understanding 24 Energy APB Auditing Practices Board 26 Excellence in technology MWh Megawatt hours APRA Annual Performance Related
    [Show full text]
  • Airbus A320-232, G-EUUI
    Airbus A320-232, G-EUUI AAIB Bulletin No: 11/2004 Ref: EW/C2003/11/04 Category: 1.1 INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Airbus A320-232, G-EUUI Registration: No & Type of Engines: 2 International Aero Engines (IAE) V2527-A5 turbofan engines Year of Manufacture: 2002 Date & Time (UTC): 29 November 2003 at 1955 hrs Location: Overhead Birmingham Type of Flight: Public Transport (Passenger) Persons on Board: Crew - 7 Passengers - 92 Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - None Nature of Damage: None Commander's Licence: Airline Transport Pilot's Licence Commander's Age: 39 years Commander's Flying 11,350 hours Experience: (of which 930 were on type) Last 90 days - 166 hours Last 28 days - 50 hours Information Source: AAIB Field Investigation Synopsis On a relatively clear evening, upon reaching the cruise level of Flight Level (FL) 280, the crew and passengers on a scheduled flight from London Heathrow to Edinburgh experienced momentary noise and vibration throughout the aircraft. This was repeated approximately one minute later. It was also reported that an orange flash, associated with the right engine, had been seen. The flight crew identified that No 2 engine had surged and recovered, with the engine indications returning to normal. The aircraft's Quick Reference Handbook, coupled with the training that the flight crew had received, provided them with inadequate guidance with which to fully assess the situation. Their initial intention to continue to Edinburgh was changed upon advice from the operator and the crew initiated a return to Heathrow. The engine then began to surge again and, once more, recovered, but this was followed by another series of surges.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Review [2122
    Jay Striegle Product Reliability Engineer A competitive portfolio We are Europe’s largest defence aero-engine company, with a product range that spans the key market sectors and a position on the world’s most important development programmes. We have 18,000 engines in service with 160 customers worldwide. Paul Markwick Test Facility Manager – Nuclear New growth opportunities Renewed global demand for civil nuclear power represents a significant growth opportunity for Rolls-Royce. We have developed a strong nuclear capability, through our experience of designing, manufacturing and supporting nuclear plant for naval submarines. We have now established a new business unit to address the civil nuclear opportunity directly. Business review (continued) Our strategy 1 As a power systems company, Rolls-Royce focuses on supplying its customers with integrated systems to meet their power and propulsion needs. Our consistent strategy has five elements: Address four global markets We are a leading integrated power systems company operating in the civil and defence aerospace, marine and energy markets. Invest in technology, infrastructure and capability Over the past five years, we have invested £3.7 billion in research and development. We invest approximately £30 million annually in training and over £300 million a year on capital projects. Develop a competitive portfolio of products and services We have more than 50 current product programmes and we are involved in many of the future projects in the markets we serve. These key projects will define the power systems market for many years. Grow market share and installed product base Across the Group, the installed base of engines in service is expected s t n to generate attractive returns over many decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Maa-Directory-2014-15-Final.Pdf
    Introduction Midlands capability for the world’s aerospace industry The Midlands Aerospace Alliance is pleased to present you with the updated 2014-2015 edition of our member capability directory – which marks our tenth annual edition. It has been designed to help you identify world-class Midlands partners and suppliers for your aerospace programmes and projects. The Midlands is home to one of the largest aerospace clusters in the world. Aerospace technologies designed and made in the Midlands can be found on the world’s most advanced aircraft. Leading names such as Aero Engine Controls, Meggitt, Moog, Rolls-Royce and UTC Aerospace Systems are major players in a region renowned for its core competency technologies: • systems that power aircraft – gas turbine engines and other propulsion systems • systems that control the moving parts of aircraft and engines – electrical, mechanical, electronic, hydraulic and pneumatic • specialist metal and composite materials that enable these systems to perform with precision in exacting environments • specialist engineering design services, factory equipment and tooling The Midlands business environment fosters the highest levels of innovation. Aerospace supply chains extend deep into our cluster’s world-class advanced engineering economy. We access and invest in a dynamic skills base, with more than 45,000 skilled people working in our aerospace industry. The mission of the Midlands Aerospace Alliance is to enhance cooperation between customers, suppliers and partners in the Midlands and globally, so that we can improve the performance of all our companies and organisations. We invite you to join us, using this directory to identify the new partners and suppliers you need to make your projects successful.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Consider When Investing in Engines
    Editor’s letter What to consider when investing in engines Engine investors need to be more reactive to changes than aircraft investors, as even a small change can impact the attractiveness of an asset. nvesting in engines is quite different to investing came into service with Lufthansa in January 2016. Iin aircraft. When investing in engines only, there How to communicate an engine issue to the is less of an emphasis on long-term contractual market as an OEM can be critical – either be open business, with power-by-the-hour contracts about the technical issues with the customers being an exception. Such contracts are risky for and accept the engine’s faults, or claim that the independent servicers, but less so for original problems have been fully addressed when they equipment manufacturers (OEMs), which can have not. The latter strategy can backfire, because control the parts supply. There are different it means that any technical issues make more customer bases to consider for engines and headlines and have more of an impact on market technical knowledge of the asset is needed to be sentiment towards the engine. able to spot opportunities. When investing in an engine, also consider the Another major difference is that lessors in aftermarket and the role the OEM has in it. OEMs the engine market often do not get a chance to are often criticised by engine investors for being order engines directly from the OEMs, but instead too involved in the aftermarket. The market is gain most of their business through sale and lucrative, but if an OEM has too much involvement leasebacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.6410 - UTC/ GOODRICH
    EN This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Case No COMP/M.6410 - UTC/ GOODRICH Only the English text is authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 8 (2) Date: 26/7/2012 EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.7.2012 C(2012) 5161 final PUBLIC VERSION COMMISSION DECISION of 26.7.2012 addressed to: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA agreement Case No COMP/M.6410 - UTC/ GOODRICH (Only the English text is authentic) EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. THE PARTIES............................................................................................................. 9 2. THE OPERATION AND THE CONCENTRATION................................................. 9 3. UNION DIMENSION................................................................................................. 9 4. THE PROCEDURE................................................................................................... 10 5. RELEVANT MARKETS...........................................................................................10 5.1. General introduction...................................................................................................10 5.2. Electrical systems....................................................................................................... 11 5.2.1. Product market definition..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 149/Thursday, August
    46186 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 149 / Thursday, August 2, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE comments, including the name of the systems for competitors’ engines. UTC submitter, and responses thereto, will be also could exploit confidential Antitrust Division posted on the U.S. Department of information gained through its work on Justice, Antitrust Division’s internet those engine control systems to United States v. United Technologies Web site, filed with the Court and, disadvantage its competitors. The Corporation and Goodrich under certain circumstances, published proposed acquisition therefore is likely Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment in the Federal Register. Comments to reduce competition substantially for and Competitive Impact Statement should be directed to Maribeth Petrizzi, aircraft turbine engines. Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Chief, Litigation II Section, Antitrust 4. UTC and a joint venture in which Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Goodrich has a fifty percent share are 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite 8700, two of the world’s three leading Final Judgment, Hold Separate Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: (202) producers of engine control systems for Stipulation and Order, and Competitive 307–0924). large aircraft turbine engines. The Impact Statement have been filed with Patricia A. Brink, proposed acquisition likely would reduce competition substantially for the United States District Court for the Director of Civil Enforcement. District of Columbia in United States v. engine control systems for large aircraft United Technologies Corporation and United States District Court for the turbine engines. Goodrich Corporation, Civil Action No.
    [Show full text]