DOCSLIB.ORG

Email: [email protected]. Models of Environments and Effects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Email: Janet.L.Barth@Nasa.Gov. Models of Environments and Effects 2.11 SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS ON SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS Janet L. Barth* NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland ABSTRACT use of rapidly evolving, miniaturized technologies. Finally, space agencies and industry are Space-based systems are developing into developing missions that must operate in critical infrastructure required to support the quality challenging space environments. For example, of life on Earth. Hence, spacecraft reliability is a earth science missions that seek to understand serious issue that is complicated by exposure to complex global change processes require global the space environment. Complex mission designs coverage that cannot be achieved in low earth along with rapidly evolving technologies have orbits (LEOs). However, placing spacecraft in the outpaced efforts to accommodate detrimental higher altitude regions of medium earth orbits space environment impacts on systems. (MEOs) and geostationary/geosynchronous orbits Hazardous space environments, the effects on (GEOs) results in a significant increase in radiation systems, and the accommodation of the effects exposure. Europe’s global positioning satellite are described with a focus on the need to predict system and NASA’s Living With A Star (LWS) space environments. Program also plan multiple spacecraft in high 1. INTRODUCTION radiation regions of the magnetosphere. Our increasing dependence on space-based The Sun emits time-varying magnetic fields, systems demands that we increase their reliability, plasmas, and energetic particles. This solar ideally achieving “all weather” space systems. variability drives changes in the interplanetary Reliability cannot be increased without careful environment which then interacts with the Earth’s management of the effects of the space magnetic field and outermost atmosphere to environment on systems. Mitigation must include produce changes in the near-Earth space both design accommodations and operational environment. The space environment and its counter-measures. Mitigating space environment solar-induced changes interact with spacecraft effects requires simulations of the effects with and instrument components and can cause accurate models of the environment and anomalies resulting in loss of data, degradation of environment interactions. The goal of simulations capability, service outages, and, in extreme cases, is to accurately predict the level of hazard. As the loss of spacecraft. shown in Fig. 1, uncertainties in the simulation Revolutionary changes have occurred in process translate directly into design margins that space-based systems since the first exploratory add overhead and can preclude the use of some missions of the “space age”. First, humanity is technologies. increasingly reliant on space-based assets. In addition to the research functions that are Space performed in space in the areas of space science, earth science, human exploration of space, and Damage Space or aeronautics and transportation; critical services Environments Interference are also space-based, including navigation, telecommunications, defense, space environment monitoring, and terrestrial weather monitoring. Second, the performance demands of reconfigurable systems, constellations of small Simulation Spacecraft Structural Model Space Component Testing in Laboratories Prediction spacecraft, large deployable structures, imagers, Environment of Hazard Component Testing in Space Models Level and on-board computing increase the complexity Interaction Models of spacecraft and payloads which often require the Uncertainties Design Margins * Corresponding author address: Janet L. Barth, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 561.4, Fig. 1: Accommodation of space environment effects Greenbelt, MD 20771, on spacecraft requires ground simulations that include email: [email protected]. models of environments and effects. Before discussing environment effects and temperature of the corona inputs sufficient energy effects accommodation, a review of space to allow electrons to escape the gravitational pull environments that are hazardous to spacecraft will of the sun. The result of the electron ejections is a be given. More detailed discussions of the charge imbalance resulting in the ejection of hazardous environments can be found in Barth protons and heavier ions from the corona. The (1997), Dyer (1998), and Mazur (2002). ejected gas is so hot that the particles are homogenized into a dilute plasma*. The energy 2. THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT density of the plasma exceeds that of its magnetic Spacecraft are exposed to a multitude of field so the solar magnetic field is “frozen” into the environments that are not present at the surface of plasma. The electrically neutral plasma streams the Earth, including micrometeoroids and orbital radially outward from the sun at a velocity of debris, ultraviolet irradiation, neutral particles, cold approximately 300 to 900 kilometers per second and hot plasma, and particle radiation. The with a temperature on the order of 104 to 106 K. interaction of these environments with spacecraft The energies of the particles range from systems cause degradation of materials, thermal approximately 0.5 to 2.0 keV/n. The average changes, contamination, excitation, spacecraft density of the solar wind is 1 to 30 particles/cm3. glow, charging, radiation damage, and induced 2.4 High-energy Interplanetary Particles background interference. There are large spatial and temporal variations in the constituency and In addition to the solar wind plasma, density of the environments; therefore, exposure interplanetary space contains high-energy charged to the environment is highly dependent on the particles called galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) that location of the spacecraft. For the purpose of are present at all times. Solar events that occur discussion of environmental definitions, missions sporadically (coronal mass ejections and flares) can be roughly categorized into LEOs, MEOs, can also be a source of high-energy particles. GEO, geosynchronous transfer orbits (GTOs), and GCR intensities rise and fall slowly with the interplanetary. solar cycle variations such that GCRs are at their peak level during solar inactive times and at their 2.1 Meteoroids and Orbital Debris lowest level during solar active times. The Meteoroids are primarily remnants of comet difference between the extremes of the GCR orbits. Several times a year Earth system fluence levels is approximately a factor of 2 to 10 encounters increased meteoroid exposure as it depending on the ion energy. Fig. 2 shows the intersects a comet orbit. Also, sporadic particles slow, long-term cyclic variation of the cosmic ray are released on a daily basis from the asteroid (C, N, O) fluences for a 20-year period as belt. Orbital debris consists of operational measured by the IMP-8 spacecraft. payloads, spent rockets stages, fragments of During active phases of the solar cycle, the rockets and satellites, and other hardware and numbers and intensity of coronal mass ejections ejecta. The United States Air Force Space and solar flares increases. These events can Command’s North American Aerospace Defence cause periodic increases in the levels of Command (NORAD) tracks over 7,000 objects in interplanetary particles that are orders of LEO that are greater than 10 cm in size, and there magnitude higher than the GCR environment. The are tens of thousands smaller objects. sharp spikes superimposed on the cosmic ray background seen in Fig. 2 are caused by solar 2.2 Ultraviolet Irradiation events. The particles consist of ions of all The sun is the natural source of ultraviolet (UV) elements but protons usually dominate the irradiation, which has wavelengths of about 100 to abundances. Solar particles diffuse as they move 400 nanometers. UV irradiance can penetrate the through the interplanetary medium. Therefore, the atmosphere to reach the surface of the Earth. UV solar particles abundances are a function of radial radiation diffuses with distance from the sun at a distance from the Sun. rate of 1/R2 where R is the radial distance from the The Earth’s magnetic field provides some Sun. protection to Earth-orbiting spacecraft from interplanetary particles by deflecting the particles 2.3 The Solar Wind The sun’s outer atmosphere, the corona, * extends several solar diameters into interplanetary Plasma is ionized gas in which electron and ion space. The corona continuously emits a stream of densities are approximately equal. Plasma is protons, electrons, doubly charged helium ions, distinguished from the energetic particle population in and small amounts of other heavy ions, that it does not cause radiation effects and has energies collectively called the solar wind. The high < 100 keV. as they impinge upon the magnetosphere. The fact, 99.9% of the solar wind particles pass around exposure of a spacecraft primarily depends on the the Earth’s magnetosphere. The flow of the solar inclination and, secondarily, the altitude of the wind around the flanks of the magnetopause trajectory. For example, interplanetary particles stretches the geomagnetic field in the anti-solar have free access over the polar regions where direction into a long tail of up to ~300 Earth radii field lines are open to interplanetary space. The altitude. Some tail field lines are not closed and penetration power of these particles is also a are connected to the solar magnetic field function of the particle’s energy and ionization embedded in the solar wind. state and of solar wind and magnetospheric conditions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Space Climate Characterization Via Geomagnetic Indices. an Attempt of Integrating Solar, Heliospheric, and Geomagnetic Indices at Various Time-Scales
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 15, EGU2013-8930, 2013 EGU General Assembly 2013 © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Space climate characterization via geomagnetic indices. An attempt of integrating solar, heliospheric, and geomagnetic indices at various time-scales Crisan Demetrescu and Venera Dobrica Institute of Geodynamics, Bucharest, Romania ([email protected]) The so-called space climate concerns the long-term change in the Sun and its effects in the heliosphere and upon the Earth, including the atmosphere and climate. Annual means of measured and reconstructed solar, heliospheric, and magnetospheric parameters are used to infer solar activity signatures at the Hale and Gleissberg cycles timescales. Available open solar flux, modulation strength, cosmic ray flux, total solar irradiance data, reconstructed back to 1700, solar wind parameters (speed, density, dynamic pressure) and the magnitude of the heliospheric magnetic field at 1 AU, reconstructed back to 1870, as well as the time series of geomagnetic activity indices (aa, IDV, IHV), going back to 1870, have been considered. Also, shorter time series of some other geomagnetic indices, designed as proxies for specific current systems, such as the ring current and the auroral electrojet, that develop in the magnetosphere and ionosphere as a consequence of the interraction with the solar wind and heliosperic magnetic field (the Dst and, respectively, AE indices), as well as the merging electric field and convection in the polar ionosphere (the PC index) have been taken into
    [Show full text]
  • Is Earth's Magnetic Field Reversing? ⁎ Catherine Constable A, , Monika Korte B
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 246 (2006) 1–16 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Frontiers Is Earth's magnetic field reversing? ⁎ Catherine Constable a, , Monika Korte b a Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0225, USA b GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany Received 7 October 2005; received in revised form 21 March 2006; accepted 23 March 2006 Editor: A.N. Halliday Abstract Earth's dipole field has been diminishing in strength since the first systematic observations of field intensity were made in the mid nineteenth century. This has led to speculation that the geomagnetic field might now be in the early stages of a reversal. In the longer term context of paleomagnetic observations it is found that for the current reversal rate and expected statistical variability in polarity interval length an interval as long as the ongoing 0.78 Myr Brunhes polarity interval is to be expected with a probability of less than 0.15, and the preferred probability estimates range from 0.06 to 0.08. These rather low odds might be used to infer that the next reversal is overdue, but the assessment is limited by the statistical treatment of reversals as point processes. Recent paleofield observations combined with insights derived from field modeling and numerical geodynamo simulations suggest that a reversal is not imminent. The current value of the dipole moment remains high compared with the average throughout the ongoing 0.78 Myr Brunhes polarity interval; the present rate of change in Earth's dipole strength is not anomalous compared with rates of change for the past 7 kyr; furthermore there is evidence that the field has been stronger on average during the Brunhes than for the past 160 Ma, and that high average field values are associated with longer polarity chrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Galand
    Thermosphere - Ionosphere - Magnetosphere Coupling! Canada M. Galand (1), I.C.F. Müller-Wodarg (1), L. Moore (2), M. Mendillo (2), S. Miller (3) , L.C. Ray (1) (1) Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, U.K. (2) Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA (3) Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, U.K. 1." Energy crisis at giant planets Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute 2." TIM coupling Cassini/ISS (false color) 3." Modeling of IT system 4." Comparison with observaons Cassini/UVIS 5." Outstanding quesAons (Pryor et al., 2011) SATURN JUPITER (Gladstone et al., 2007) Cassini/UVIS [UVIS team] Cassini/VIMS (IR) Credit: J. Clarke (BU), NASA [VIMS team/JPL, NASA, ESA] 1. SETTING THE SCENE: THE ENERGY CRISIS AT THE GIANT PLANETS THERMAL PROFILE Exosphere (EARTH) Texo 500 km Key transiLon region Thermosphere between the space environment and the lower atmosphere Ionosphere 85 km Mesosphere 50 km Stratosphere ~ 15 km Troposphere SOLAR ENERGY DEPOSITION IN THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE Solar photons ion, e- Neutral Suprathermal electrons B ion, e- Thermal e- Ionospheric Thermosphere Ne, Nion e- heang Te P, H * + Airglow Neutral atmospheric Exothermic reacAons heang IS THE SUN THE MAIN ENERGY SOURCE OF PLANERATY THERMOSPHERES? W Main energy source: UV solar radiaon Main energy source? EartH Outer planets CO2 atmospHeres Exospheric temperature (K) [aer Mendillo et al., 2002] ENERGY CRISIS AT THE GIANT PLANETS Observed values at low to mid-latudes solsce equinox Modeled values (Sun only) [Aer
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Space Weather
    Severe Space Weather ThePerfect Solar Superstorm Solar storms in +,-. wreaked havoc on telegraph networks worldwide and produced auroras nearly to the equator. What would a recurrence do to our modern technological world? Daniel N. Baker & James L. Green SOHO / ESA / NASA / LASCO 28 February 2011 !"# $ %&'&!()*& SStormtorm llayoutayout FFeb.inddeb.indd 2288 111/30/101/30/10 88:09:37:09:37 AAMM DRAMATIC AURORAL DISPLAYS were seen over nearly the entire world on the night of August !"–!&, $"%&. In New York City, thousands watched “the heavens . arrayed in a drapery more gorgeous than they have been for years.” The aurora witnessed that Sunday night, The New York Times told its readers, “will be referred to hereafter among the events which occur but once or twice in a lifetime.” An even more spectacular aurora occurred on Septem- ber !, $"%&, and displays of remarkable brilliance, color, and duration continued around the world until Septem- ber #th. Auroras were seen nearly to the equator. Even after daybreak, when the auroras were no longer visible, disturbances in Earth’s magnetic fi eld were so powerful ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY / © PHOTO RESEARCHERS that magnetometer traces were driven off scale. Telegraph PRELUDE TO THE STORM British amateur astronomer Rich- networks around the globe experienced major disrup- ard Carrington sketched this enormous sunspot group on Sep- tions and outages, with some telegraphs being completely tember $, $()*. During his observations he witnessed two brilliant unusable for nearly " hours. In several regions, operators beads of light fl are up over the sunspots, and then disappear, in disconnected their systems from the batteries and sent a matter of ) minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Doc.10100.Space Weather Manual FINAL DRAFT Version
    Doc 10100 Manual on Space Weather Information in Support of International Air Navigation Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition – 2018 International Civil Aviation Organization TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Space weather indicators .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 The hazards ........................................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Space weather mitigation aspects ....................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Coordinating the response to a space weather event ......................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2. Space Weather Phenomena and Aviation Operations ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Geomagnetic storms ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Future Mars Environment for Science and Exploration
    Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1989) 8250.pdf A FUTURE MARS ENVIRONMENT FOR SCIENCE AND EXPLORATION. J. L. Green1, J. Hol- lingsworth2, D. Brain3, V. Airapetian4, A. Glocer4, A. Pulkkinen4, C. Dong5 and R. Bamford6 (1NASA HQ, 2ARC, 3U of Colorado, 4GSFC, 5Princeton University, 6Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) Introduction: Today, Mars is an arid and cold world of existing simulation tools that reproduce the physics with a very thin atmosphere that has significant frozen of the processes that model today’s Martian climate. A and underground water resources. The thin atmosphere series of simulations can be used to assess how best to both prevents liquid water from residing permanently largely stop the solar wind stripping of the Martian on its surface and makes it difficult to land missions atmosphere and allow the atmosphere to come to a new since it is not thick enough to completely facilitate a equilibrium. soft landing. In its past, under the influence of a signif- Models hosted at the Coordinated Community icant greenhouse effect, Mars may have had a signifi- Modeling Center (CCMC) are used to simulate a mag- cant water ocean covering perhaps 30% of the northern netic shield, and an artificial magnetosphere, for Mars hemisphere. When Mars lost its protective magneto- by generating a magnetic dipole field at the Mars L1 sphere, three or more billion years ago, the solar wind Lagrange point within an average solar wind environ- was allowed to directly ravish its atmosphere.[1] The ment. The magnetic field will be increased until the lack of a magnetic field, its relatively small mass, and resulting magnetotail of the artificial magnetosphere its atmospheric photochemistry, all would have con- encompasses the entire planet as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictability of the Variable Solar-Terrestrial Coupling Ioannis A
    https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2020-94 Preprint. Discussion started: 26 January 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Predictability of the variable solar-terrestrial coupling Ioannis A. Daglis1,15, Loren C. Chang2, Sergio Dasso3, Nat Gopalswamy4, Olga V. Khabarova5, Emilia Kilpua6, Ramon Lopez7, Daniel Marsh8,16, Katja Matthes9,17, Dibyendu Nandi10, Annika Seppälä11, Kazuo Shiokawa12, Rémi Thiéblemont13 and Qiugang Zong14 5 1Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece 2Department of Space Science and Engineering, Center for Astronautical Physics and Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan 3Department of Physics, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 10 4Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 5Solar-Terrestrial Department, Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation of RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, 108840, Russia 6Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 7Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA 15 8National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305, USA 9GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany 10IISER, Kolkata, India 11Department of Physics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 12Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan 20 13LATMOS, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France 14School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China 15Hellenic Space Center, Athens, Greece 16Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 17Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany 25 Correspondence to: Ioannis A. Daglis ([email protected]) Abstract. In October 2017, the Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics (SCOSTEP) Bureau established a 30 committee for the design of SCOSTEP’s Next Scientific Program (NSP).
    [Show full text]
  • Diffuse Electron Precipitation in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere- Thermosphere Coupling
    EGU21-6342 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6342 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Diffuse electron precipitation in magnetosphere-ionosphere- thermosphere coupling Dong Lin1, Wenbin Wang1, Viacheslav Merkin2, Kevin Pham1, Shanshan Bao3, Kareem Sorathia2, Frank Toffoletto3, Xueling Shi1,4, Oppenheim Meers5, George Khazanov6, Adam Michael2, John Lyon7, Jeffrey Garretson2, and Brian Anderson2 1High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO, United States of America 2Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel MD, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston TX, USA 4Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, USA 5Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston MA, USA 6Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Greenbelt MD, USA 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH, USA Auroral precipitation plays an important role in magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere (MIT) coupling by enhancing ionospheric ionization and conductivity at high latitudes. Diffuse electron precipitation refers to scattered electrons from the plasma sheet that are lost in the ionosphere. Diffuse precipitation makes the largest contribution to the total precipitation energy flux and is expected to have substantial impacts on the ionospheric conductance and affect the electrodynamic coupling between the magnetosphere and ionosphere-thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling
    Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling F. Toffoletto, Rice University Figure courtesy T. W. Hill with thanks to R. A. Wolf and T. W. Hill, Rice U. Outline • Introduction • Properties of the Solar Wind Near Earth • The Magnetosheath • The Magnetopause • Basic Physical Processes that control Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling – Open and Closed Magnetosphere Processes – Electrodynamic coupling – Mass, Momentum and Energy coupling – The role of the ionosphere • Current Status and Summary QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture. Introduction • By virtue of our proximity, the Earth’s magnetosphere is the most studied and perhaps best understood magnetosphere – The system is rather complex in its structure and behavior and there are still some basic unresolved questions – Today’s lecture will focus on describing the coupling to the major driver of the magnetosphere - the solar wind, and the ionosphere – Monday’s lecture will look more at the more dynamic (and controversial) aspect of magnetospheric dynamics: storms and substorms The Solar Wind Near the Earth Solar-Wind Properties Observed Near Earth • Solar wind parameters observed by many spacecraft over period 1963-86. From Hapgood et al. (Planet. Space Sci., 39, 410, 1991). Solar Wind Observed Near Earth Values of Solar-Wind Parameters Parameter Minimum Most Maximum Probable Velocity v (km/s) 250 370 2000× Number density n (cm-3) 683 Ram pressure rv2 (nPa)* 328 Magnetic field strength B 0 6 85 (nanoteslas) IMF Bz (nanoteslas) -31 0¤ 27 * 1 nPa = 1 nanoPascal = 10-9 Newtons/m2. Indicates at least one interval with B < 0.1 nT. ¤ Mean value was 0.014 nT, with a standard deviation of 3.3 nT.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E
    Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, E. Yordanova, S. Good, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, E. Lumme, A. Osmane, et al. To cite this version: E. K. J. Kilpua, D. Fontaine, C. Moissard, M. Ala-lahti, E. Palmerio, et al.. Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Driver Dependence. Space Weather: The International Journal of Research and Applications, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2019, 17 (8), pp.1257-1280. 10.1029/2019SW002217. hal-03087107 HAL Id: hal-03087107 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03087107 Submitted on 23 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ARTICLE Solar Wind Properties and Geospace Impact of Coronal 10.1029/2019SW002217 Mass Ejection-Driven Sheath Regions: Variation and Key Points: Driver Dependence • Variation of interplanetary properties and geoeffectiveness of CME-driven sheaths and their dependence on the E. K. J. Kilpua1 , D. Fontaine2 , C. Moissard2 , M. Ala-Lahti1 , E. Palmerio1 , ejecta properties are determined E.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Magnetospheres
    CLBE001-ESS2E November 9, 2006 17:4 100-C 25-C 50-C 75-C C+M 50-C+M C+Y 50-C+Y M+Y 50-M+Y 100-M 25-M 50-M 75-M 100-Y 25-Y 50-Y 75-Y 100-K 25-K 25-19-19 50-K 50-40-40 75-K 75-64-64 Planetary Magnetospheres Margaret Galland Kivelson University of California Los Angeles, California Fran Bagenal University of Colorado, Boulder Boulder, Colorado CHAPTER 28 1. What is a Magnetosphere? 5. Dynamics 2. Types of Magnetospheres 6. Interaction with Moons 3. Planetary Magnetic Fields 7. Conclusions 4. Magnetospheric Plasmas 1. What is a Magnetosphere? planet’s magnetic field. Moreover, unmagnetized planets in the flowing solar wind carve out cavities whose properties The term magnetosphere was coined by T. Gold in 1959 are sufficiently similar to those of true magnetospheres to al- to describe the region above the ionosphere in which the low us to include them in this discussion. Moons embedded magnetic field of the Earth controls the motions of charged in the flowing plasma of a planetary magnetosphere create particles. The magnetic field traps low-energy plasma and interaction regions resembling those that surround unmag- forms the Van Allen belts, torus-shaped regions in which netized planets. If a moon is sufficiently strongly magne- high-energy ions and electrons (tens of keV and higher) tized, it may carve out a true magnetosphere completely drift around the Earth. The control of charged particles by contained within the magnetosphere of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • PSTEP: Project for Solar–Terrestrial Environment Prediction
    Kusano et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2021) 73:159 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01486-1 FRONTIER LETTER Open Access PSTEP: project for solar–terrestrial environment prediction Kanya Kusano1* , Kiyoshi Ichimoto2, Mamoru Ishii3, Yoshizumi Miyoshi4, Shigeo Yoden5, Hideharu Akiyoshi6, Ayumi Asai7, Yusuke Ebihara8, Hitoshi Fujiwara9, Tada‑Nori Goto10, Yoichiro Hanaoka11, Hisashi Hayakawa4, Keisuke Hosokawa12, Hideyuki Hotta13, Kornyanat Hozumi3, Shinsuke Imada1, Kazumasa Iwai4, Toshihiko Iyemori14, Hidekatsu Jin3, Ryuho Kataoka15, Yuto Katoh16, Takashi Kikuchi4, Yûki Kubo17, Satoshi Kurita8, Haruhisa Matsumoto18, Takefumi Mitani19, Hiroko Miyahara20, Yasunobu Miyoshi21, Tsutomu Nagatsuma22, Aoi Nakamizo3, Satoko Nakamura4, Hiroyuki Nakata23, Naoto Nishizuka3, Yuichi Otsuka4, Shinji Saito3, Susumu Saito24, Takashi Sakurai11, Tatsuhiko Sato25, Toshifumi Shimizu19, Hiroyuki Shinagawa3, Kazuo Shiokawa4, Daikou Shiota3, Takeshi Takashima19, Chihiro Tao3, Shin Toriumi19, Satoru Ueno26, Kyoko Watanabe27, Shinichi Watari3, Seiji Yashiro28, Kohei Yoshida29 and Akimasa Yoshikawa30 Abstract Although solar activity may signifcantly impact the global environment and socioeconomic systems, the mecha‑ nisms for solar eruptions and the subsequent processes have not yet been fully understood. Thus, modern society supported by advanced information systems is at risk from severe space weather disturbances. Project for solar–ter‑ restrial environment prediction (PSTEP) was launched to improve this situation through synergy between basic science research and operational forecast. The PSTEP is a nationwide research collaboration in Japan and was con‑ ducted from April 2015 to March 2020, supported by a Grant‑in‑Aid for Scientifc Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. By this project, we sought to answer the fundamental questions concerning the solar–terrestrial environment and aimed to build a next‑generation space weather forecast system to prepare for severe space weather disasters.
    [Show full text]