DOCSLIB.ORG

Pepsico | Violation Tracker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pepsico | Violation Tracker Support Us Subsidy Accountability Smart Corporate Violation Newsroom Publications Tracker Resources Growth Research Project Tracker « Return to search form Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary Parent Company Name: PepsiCo Ownership Structure: publicly traded (ticker symbol PEP) Headquartered in: New York Major Industry: food products Specific Industry: food products Penalty total since 2000: $28,002,288 Number of records: 119 Top 10 Primary Offense Types Penalty Total Number of Records wage and hour violation $20,849,491 11 employment discrimination $5,040,000 3 workplace safety or health violation $805,340 69 labor relations violation $696,389 19 environmental violation $514,387 12 aviation safety violation $66,100 2 Family and Medical Leave Act $24,661 2 motor vehicle safety violation $5,920 1 Notes: Parent-subsidiary linkages are based on relationships current as of the latest revision listed in theU pdate Log, which may vary from what was the case when a violation occurred. The penalty dollar total above may be adjusted to account for the fact that the list of entries below may include both agency records and settlement announcements for the same case; or else a penalty covering multiple locations may be listed in the individual records for each of the facilities. Duplicate penalty amounts are marked with an asterisk in the list below. Associated Names: ALPAC; BOTTLING GROUP; BOTTLING GROUP D / B / A PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP; BOTTLING GROUP FKA PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP; EPIC ENTERPRISES, INC.; FRITO LAY; FRITO LAY ROSENBERG; NAKED JUICE; P-AMERICAS LLC; PEPSI; PEPSI BEVERAGES; PEPSI BOTTLING; PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP SW MARKET UNIT; PEPSI BOTTLING HOLDING; PEPSI COLA BOTTLING OF OHIO; PEPSI COLA MFG INTL LIMITED; PEPSI COLA TECHNICAL OPERATIONS; PEPSIAMERICAS; PEPSICO; PEPSICO BEVERAGES AND FOODS / QUAKER OATS; PEPSICO INTL; QUAKER OATS; RECOT; ROLLING FRI [...] Links: Subsidy Tracker data on financial assistance to this company by federal, state and local government agencies can be foundh ere. Individual Penalty Records: Download results as or XML Penalty Amount Company Primary Offense Type Year Agency private lawsuit- Frito-Lay wage and hour violation 2001 $11,900,000 federal Pepsi Beverages employment discrimination 2012 EEOC $3,130,000 private lawsuit- Pepsi Beverages Company wage and hour violation 2016 Penalty $A3m,00o0u,0n0t0 Company Primary Offense Type Year feAdgeeranl cy private lawsuit- Frito-Lay wage and hour violation 2012 $2,000,000 federal South Beach Beverage Company, Inc. employment discrimination 2002 EEOC $1,790,000 private lawsuit- Frito-Lay wage and hour violation 2014 $1,600,000 federal private lawsuit- Frito-Lay wage and hour violation 2012 $1,575,000 federal private lawsuit- Bottling Group LLC (fka Pepsi Bottling Group) wage and hour violation 2012 $625,066 federal Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2008 NLRB $196,969 Pepsi Bottling Group Inc. employment discrimination 2011 EEOC $120,000 TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC. (Permit FL0000043) Administrative Consent environmental violation 2002 EPA $103,500 Order Pepsico labor relations violation 2008 NLRB $90,123 Tropicana Products, Inc. environmental violation 2008 EPA $80,000 FRITO-LAY, INC. environmental violation 2017 EPA $78,217 Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2001 NLRB $75,000 workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC. 2008 OSHA $69,000 violation Frito Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2009 NLRB $64,000 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC environmental violation 2016 EPA $61,405 workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2001 OSHA $57,000 violation Pepsi Cola Technical Operations, Inc. environmental violation 2005 EPA $55,575 Frito Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2002 NLRB $54,766 PEPSICO INTERNATIONAL aviation safety violation 2013 FAA $53,725 Pepsi Americas wage and hour violation 2007 WHD $50,279 Pepsi Americas, Inc. wage and hour violation 2005 WHD $47,617 Bottling Group, LLC Mesquite, Texas environmental violation 2016 EPA $37,500 PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, LLC environmental violation 2012 EPA $34,515 workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2013 OSHA $32,500 violation The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. labor relations violation 2008 NLRB $32,259 workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2001 OSHA $31,050 violation workplace safety or health PEPSICO 2013 OSHA $28,950 violation workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2017 OSHA $28,000 violation Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2001 NLRB $25,200 PepsiCo Beverages and Foods/Quaker Oats Company labor relations violation 2007 NLRB $25,000 PEPSI COLA GENERAL BOTTLERS, INC environmental violation 2001 EPA $24,435 workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC.,DBA PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2012 OSHA $23,000 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC 2011 OSHA $22,000 violation Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. labor relations violation 2006 NLRB $21,335 Pepsi Bottling Holdings Inc. wage and hour violation 2012 WHD $20,200 Frito-Lay, Inc. Family and Medical Leave Act 2017 WHD $19,643 Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2005 NLRB Penalty Am$1o9u,0n0t0 Company Primary Offense Type Year Agency workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2013 OSHA $18,560 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2006 OSHA $18,000 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2008 OSHA $18,000 violation workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2002 OSHA $16,875 violation FRITO-LAY ROSENBERG environmental violation 2014 EPA $16,775 Pepsi Cola Bottling Co., Inc. wage and hour violation 2004 WHD $16,665 Pepsi Bottling Group labor relations violation 2004 NLRB $16,051 The Pepsi Bottling Group labor relations violation 2007 NLRB $15,996 Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2006 NLRB $15,695 Pepsi-Americas, Inc. wage and hour violation 2005 WHD $14,664 workplace safety or health QUAKER MANUFACTURING LLC 2010 OSHA $14,500 violation workplace safety or health P-AMERICAS LLC 2012 OSHA $13,685 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC 2003 OSHA $13,075 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC.,DBA PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2012 OSHA $13,010 violation workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2001 OSHA $12,750 violation workplace safety or health PEPSICO 2016 OSHA $12,471 violation PEPSI COLA GENERAL BOTTLERS, INC. environmental violation 2000 EPA $12,465 PEPSI COLA MFG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED aviation safety violation 2012 FAA $12,375 Frito-Lay, Inc. labor relations violation 2005 NLRB $11,756 workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2004 OSHA $11,050 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2002 OSHA $10,975 violation workplace safety or health EPIC ENTERPRISES, INC. 2000 OSHA $10,725 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2012 OSHA $10,710 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF OHIO, INC. 2000 OSHA $10,000 violation workplace safety or health THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2008 OSHA $9,350 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING CO. 2011 OSHA $9,112 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI-COLA GENERAL BOTTLERS, INC. 2000 OSHA $9,000 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2001 OSHA $9,000 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP SW MARKET UNIT 2007 OSHA $9,000 violation workplace safety or health TROPICANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. 2011 OSHA $9,000 violation workplace safety or health P-AMERICAS, LLC 2017 OSHA $9,000 violation workplace safety or health Penalty Amount BCOoTmTLpINaGny GROUP, LLC Primary Offense Type 2Y0e11ar OASgHeAncy $8,438 violation Pepsi Bottling Group labor relations violation 2004 NLRB $8,352 PEPSI AMERICAS labor relations violation 2002 NLRB $8,307 workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2005 OSHA $8,125 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC 2013 OSHA $7,715 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2011 OSHA $7,650 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2011 OSHA $7,500 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC 2013 OSHA $7,500 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP, LLC D/B/A THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2008 OSHA $7,365 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY violation 2015 OSHA $7,140 workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2007 OSHA $7,125 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2010 OSHA $7,000 violation workplace safety or health THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2006 OSHA $6,975 violation workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2001 OSHA $6,900 violation workplace safety or health SVC MANUFACTURING INC 2011 OSHA $6,885 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY INC. 2013 OSHA $6,750 violation workplace safety or health PEPSIAMERICAS 2008 OSHA $6,500 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI COLA BOTTLING GROUP 2003 OSHA $6,400 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI NORTHWEST BEVERAGES LLC 2011 OSHA $6,400 violation workplace safety or health FRITO-LAY, INC. 2001 OSHA $6,300 violation workplace safety or health ALPAC CORPORATION 2015 OSHA $6,300 violation workplace safety or health BOTTLING GROUP LLC 2016 OSHA $6,125 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2003 OSHA $6,090 violation workplace safety or health NAKED JUICE 2006 OSHA $6,010 violation workplace safety or health PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. 2005 OSHA $6,000 violation workplace safety or health STACY'S PITA CHIP COMPANY 2006 OSHA $6,000 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 2013 OSHA $6,000 violation workplace safety or health PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2003 OSHA $5,951 violation workplace safety or health THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP 2005 OSHA $5,949 violation Penalty Amount RCOoLmLINpGan FyRITO LAY SALES LP mPortiomr vaerhyic Olef sfeafnestye v Tioylaptioen 2Y0e06ar FAMgCeSnAcy $5,920 1 2 next > last >> Download results as or XML Note: our penalty amounts include not only fines and monetary settlements but also costs such as supplementary environmental projects or consumer relief that companies are often compelled to undertake as part of settlements. If the settlement includes fines paid to state governments, those are included as well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In re PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. : Consolidated C.A. No. 4530-VCS SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“Philadelphia PERS”), The General Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit General”), The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit P&F”), the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System (“Ann Arbor”) and Beverly Rosman (“Rosman,” and collectively with Philadelphia PERS, Detroit General, Detroit P&F and Ann Arbor, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs are holders of common stock of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (“PAS” or the “Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of PAS common stock other than the defendants and their affiliates. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and other equitable relief in connection with the proposal of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) to acquire all of the PAS’ outstanding shares that PepsiCo does not already own for a combination of cash and stock valuing PAS at $23.27 per share (the “Proposed Merger”). 2. PepsiCo simultaneously offered to acquire Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG” and with PAS, the “Companies”) at $29.50 per share, and has made consummation of a merger with either bottler contingent on consummating a merger with the other. PepsiCo’s offers are timed and structured to favor PepsiCo and promise a paltry 17.1 percent premium over the closing prices of the Companies’ stock on April 17, 2009, the last trading day prior to PepsiCo’s announcement of the Proposed Merger.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Award Winners 2007
    GPLA booklet 04 new 9/28/04 6:59 PM Page 37 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Department of Energy • Center for Resource Solutions 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards The 2007 Green Power Leadership Awards are hosted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States Department of Energy (DOE), and the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS). EPA and DOE recognize leading green power purchasers and green power suppliers respectively. CRS recognizes leading organizations and individuals building the market for green power. The Green Power Leadership Awards for purchasers is a recognition program of the EPA Green Power Partnership, a voluntary program working to reduce the environmental impact of electricity use by fostering development of the voluntary green power market. The Partnership provides technical assistance and public recognition to organizations that commit to using green power for a portion of their electricity needs. Partners in the program include Fortune 500 companies, states, federal agencies, universities, and leading organizations around the country that have made a commitment to green power. For the 2007 green power supplier and purchaser awards, two panels of judges reviewed nearly 100 nominations through a national competitive review process. Purchasers were evaluated based upon the size and characteristics of their green power commitment, ingenuity used to overcome barriers, internal and external communication efforts, and overall renewable energy strategy. Recognition of these companies falls into three categories: On-site Generation, Green Power Purchasing, and Green Power Partner of the Year. Suppliers were evaluated based on the following criteria: technologies utilized, total sales, evidence of annual audit to verify procurement and sales, amount of green power supplied, and number of customers served.
    [Show full text]
  • TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) a Corporation
    042 3154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Thomas B. Leary Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz ) In the Matter of ) ) DOCKET NO. C-4145 TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) a corporation. ) ) COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Tropicana Products, Inc., a corporation, (“respondent”), has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent is a Delaware corporation with its principal office or place of business at 555 Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661. 2. Respondent has advertised, labeled, offered for sale, sold, and distributed food products to the public, including orange juice sold under the “Tropicana” name. 3. Orange juice is a “food” within the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 4. The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 5. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated national advertising and promotional materials for its orange juice, including but not limited to the television and print advertisements attached as Exhibits A-C. The advertisements contain the following statements and depictions: Page 1 of 5 A. VISUAL: Carton of Tropicana orange juice with blood pressure gauge attached. TEXT: Lowering your blood pressure never tasted so good. VISUAL: Two small glasses of orange juice. TEXT: A new clinical study shows enjoying two glasses of Tropicana Pure Premium every day can lower your blood pressure an average of ten points.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pepsi Bottling Group
    Supply Chain Manufacturing & Warehouse – Intern Future Leaders Program Pepsi Americas Beverages (PAB) is PepsiCo's beverage and food manufacturing, sales and distribution operating unit in the United States, Canada and Mexico. PAB makes, sells and delivers approximately 75 percent of PepsiCo's North American beverage volume. Its diverse portfolio includes some of the world's most widely recognized beverage and food brands, including Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Sierra Mist, Aquafina, Amp Energy, Gatorade, Propel, SoBe, Lipton, Tropicana, Naked Juice, IZZE, Quaker, Rice-A-Roni, Cap'n Crunch and Quaker Life. In many markets, PAB also manufactures and/or distributes allied brands, including Dr Pepper, Crush, ROCKSTAR, FRS and Muscle Milk. At PAB, employees have an Unquenchable Spirit to delight consumers with the brands they love, to improve the communities in which they live and work, and to build exciting careers. If you're looking for a company that puts a premium on leadership, teamwork and responsibility, you belong at PAB. General Summary: The Pepsi Americas Beverages’ Supply Chain Manufacturing & Warehouse Future Leaders Program provides a demanding, fast-paced environment in a competitive industry, where growth equals opportunity and fun accompanies the challenge. Decisions are made “real time” where interns have the opportunity to provide support through the application of core analyses and engineering techniques, including process flow design and mapping, productivity measures, time studies, data collection and computational analyses within production and operations areas of our facilities. During the Summer Internship, you will: Study supply chain processes, develop analytical and statistical tools, recommend workflow, equipment, or other changes based on analyses to facilitate improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepsico Q2 2019 10-Q
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 15, 2019 (24 weeks) OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-1183 PepsiCo, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) North Carolina 13-1584302 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) 914-253-2000 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) N/A (Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Title of each class Trading Symbols Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value 1-2/3 cents per share PEP The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 2.500% Senior Notes Due 2022 PEP22a The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 1.750% Senior Notes Due 2021 PEP21a The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 2.625% Senior Notes Due 2026 PEP26 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 0.875% Senior Notes Due 2028 PEP28 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 0.750% Senior Notes Due 2027 PEP27 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 1.125% Senior Notes Due 2031 PEP31 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP ANNUAL REPORT DPS at a Glance
    DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP ANNUAL REPORT DPS at a Glance NORTH AMERICA’S LEADING FLAVORED BEVERAGE COMPANY More than 50 brands of juices, teas and carbonated soft drinks with a heritage of more than 200 years NINE OF OUR 12 LEADING BRANDS ARE NO. 1 IN THEIR FLAVOR CATEGORIES Named Company of the Year in 2010 by Beverage World magazine CEO LARRY D. YOUNG NAMED 2010 BEVERAGE EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR BY BEVERAGE INDUSTRY MAGAZINE OUR VISION: Be the Best Beverage Business in the Americas STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE PRIMARY SOURCES & USES OF CASH VS. S&P 500 TWO-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL ’09–’10 JAN ’10 MAR JUN SEP DEC ’10 $3.4B $3.3B 40% DPS Pepsi/Coke 30% Share Repurchases S&P Licensing Agreements 20% Dividends Net Repayment 10% of Credit Facility Operations & Notes 0% Capital Spending -10% SOURCES USES 2010 FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT (MILLIONS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE) CONTENTS 2010 $5,636 NET SALES +2% 2009 $5,531 $ 1, 3 21 SEGMENT +1% Letter to Stockholders 1 OPERATING PROFIT $ 1, 310 Build Our Brands 4 $2.40 DILUTED EARNINGS +22% PER SHARE* $1.97 Grow Per Caps 7 Rapid Continuous Improvement 10 *2010 diluted earnings per share (EPS) excludes a loss on early extinguishment of debt and certain tax-related items, which totaled Innovation Spotlight 23 cents per share. 2009 diluted EPS excludes a net gain on certain 12 distribution agreement changes and tax-related items, which totaled 20 cents per share. See page 13 for a detailed reconciliation of the Stockholder Information 12 7 excluded items and the rationale for the exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 795 795 Complaint IN THE MA TIER OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY FINAL ORDER, OPINION, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SEC. 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT AND SEC. 5 OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT Docket 9207. Complaint, July 15, 1986--Final Order, June 13, 1994 This final order requires Coca-Cola, for ten years, to obtain Commission approval before acquiring any part of the stock or interest in any company that manufactures or sells branded concentrate, syrup, or carbonated soft drinks in the United States. Appearances For the Commission: Joseph S. Brownman, Ronald Rowe, Mary Lou Steptoe and Steven J. Rurka. For the respondent: Gordon Spivack and Wendy Addiss, Coudert Brothers, New York, N.Y. 798 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS Initial Decision 117F.T.C. INITIAL DECISION BY LEWIS F. PARKER, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE NOVEMBER 30, 1990 I. INTRODUCTION The Commission's complaint in this case issued on July 15, 1986 and it charged that The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") had entered into an agreement to purchase 100 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of DP Holdings, Inc. ("DP Holdings") which, in tum, owned all of the shares of capital stock of Dr Pepper Company ("Dr Pepper"). The complaint alleged that Coca-Cola and Dr Pepper were direct competitors in the carbonated soft drink industry and that the effect of the acquisition, if consummated, may be substantially to lessen competition in relevant product markets in relevant sections of the country in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepsico, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    FORM 10-K PEPSICO INC - PEP Exhibit: � Filed: February 20, 2007 (period: December 30, 2006) Annual report which provides a comprehensive overview of the company for the past year Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Business 1 PART I Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of E Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management s Discussion and Analysis Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matt Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules SIGNATURES ITEM 15(a)(3) EX-3.2 (BY-LAWS OF PEPSICO) EX-10.31 (AMENDMENTS TO THE PEPSICO) EX-10.34 (AMENDMENTS TO THE PEPSICO EXECUTIVE INCOME DEFERRAL PROGRAM) EX-10.41 (AMENDMENT TO THE PEPSICO) EX-12 (COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES.) EX-21 (SUBSIDAIRIES OF PEPSICO INC) EX-23 (CONSENT OF KPMG LLP.) EX-24 (POWER OF ATTORNEY) EX-31 (CERTIFICATION OF OUR CEO AND OUR CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302) EX-32 (CERTIFICATION OF OUR CEO AND OUR CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Management
    Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... Pepsi Co History.................................................................................................................. PepsiCo’s Mission............................................................................................................ Competitive and Supply Chain Strategies....................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... PepsiCo’s Supply Chain Management.................................................................................. Difficulties without Just-in-Time ..................................................................................... Improvement with using Just-In-Time (JIT)....................................................................... I2 Transportation ............................................................................................................ Implementation............................................................................................................... I2 Supply Chain Visibility................................................................................................. E-solution by Hewlett Packard (HP) .................................................................................... Pepsi Bottling.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Sugary Drink Nutrition and Marketing to Youth Methods
    Evaluating Sugary Drink Nutrition and Marketing to Youth Methods Sugary Drink FACTS: Evaluating Sugary Drink Nutrition and Marketing to Youth Authors: Jennifer L. Harris, PhD, MBA Marlene B. Schwartz, PhD Kelly D. Brownell, PhD Johanna Javadizadeh, MBA Megan Weinberg, MA Vishnudas Sarda, MBBS, MPH Christina Munsell, MS, RD Carol Shin, MBA Fran Fleming Milici, PhD Amy Ustjanauskas Renee Gross Sarah Speers Andrew Cheyne, CPhil Lori Dorfman, DrPH Priscilla Gonzalez, MPH Pamela Mejia, MS, MPH Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity October, 2011 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their valuable assistance in collecting data: Susannah Albert-Chandhok Ryan Gebhard Darina Nghiem Josh Baker Eliza Gombert Eunie Park Kate Barnett Jay Imus Angel Reese Kelly Barrett Heather Kaplan Hannah Sheehy Casey Carden Carly Litzenberger Jennifer Shin Robert Dowding Benjamin Lovell Ashita Soni Ashley Firth, MA Lisa Martinez, MPH Kate Stearns We would also like to thank our steering committee and other advisors: Doug Blanke, JD Dale Kunkel, PhD Mary Story, PhD, RD Frank Chaloupka, PhD Tim Lobstein, PhD Stephen Teret, JD, MPH Thomas Farley, MD, MPH Susan T. Mayne, PhD Ellen Wartella, PhD Sonya A Grier, PhD, MBA C. Tracy Orleans, PhD James G. Webster, PhD Corinna Hawkes, PhD Lisa M. Powell, PhD Walter Willett, MD, DrPH Shiriki Kumanyika, PhD, MPH Amelie Ramirez, DrPH Jerome D. Williams, PhD Thank you to our colleagues at the Rudd Center, especially Andrea Wilson, Megan Orciari, and Tricia Wynne We thank Cavich Creative, LLC, and Chris Lenz for their assistance in preparing the manuscript and website. Finally, we thank the leadership and staff at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with special thanks to the Childhood Obesity Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions of the United States Court of International Trade
    Decisions of the United States Court of International Trade ᭜ SLIP OP. 07–55 TROPICANA PRODUCTS,INC., Plaintiff, and LOUIS DREYFUS CITRUS, INC., and FISCHER S/A AGROINDUSTRIA, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and A. DUDA &SONS,INC., CITRUS WORLD,INC., FLORIDA CITRUS MUTUAL,SOUTHERN GARDEN CITRUS PROCESSING CORP., and THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenors. Before: Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge Court No. 06–00109 Public Version OPINION [The International Trade Commission’s affirmative determination of material in- jury by reason of imports of certain orange juice from Brazil REMANDED.] Dated: April 12, 2007 Neville Peterson, LLP (John M. Peterson, Catherine C. Chen, and George W. Th- ompson for the plaintiff. Vinson & Elkins, LLP (Christopher A. Dunn and Valerie S. Ellis) for the plaintiff- intervenor Louis Dreyfus Citrus, Inc. Kalik Lewin (Robert G. Kalik and Brenna S. Lenchak) for the plaintiff-intervenor Fischer S/A Agroindustria. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne Davidson, Director, Commer- cial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (Michael J. Dierberg), for the defendant. James M. Lyons, General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission (David A.J. Goldfine and Andrea C. Casson) for the defendant. Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Stephen W. Brophy) for defendant-intervenor A. Duda & Sons, Inc., Citrus World, Inc., Florida Citrus Mutual, and Southern Gardens Citrus Processing Corp. Crowell & Moring, LLP (Jeffrey L. Snyder and Alexander H. Schaefer) for the defendant-intervenor the Coca-Cola Company. Restani, Chief Judge: This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Tropicana Products Inc.’s (‘‘Tropicana’’) motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony Late
    c TESTIMONY HB 2083 HDI c LATE ( =THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP ( LATE TESTIMONY March 12, 2010 . Senator Clayton Hee, Chair Senate Committee on Water, Land, Agriculture and Hawaiian Affairs Friday, March 12, 2010 Conference Room 229; 2:45 p.m. Re: HE 2083 HD1 - Relating to Milk Labeling Chair Hee and Vice Chair Tokuda, and members of the Committee: My name is Gary Yoshioka, Vice President & General Manager of The Pepsi Bottling Group of Hawaii ("Pepsi"), testifying in opposition to HB 2083 HD1, which requires milk and soy milk beverages to be labeled with the date of pasteurization or the date of packaging. The additional milk labeling requirement set forth in this legislation is unnecessary and would be unnecessarily costly and burdensome to milk producers and the beverage manufacturers that bottle milk products. c Through a joint venture between Starbucks and PepsiCo, Pepsi has bottled Starbucks Frappuccino coffee drink since 1996. The coffee drink is blended with milk Milk products are currently labeled with "sell by" dates, which consumers use to determine the freshness of their beverage. "Sell by" dates are based on and reflect our expertise as to the life of our products. A "pasteurized/packaged on" date would leave that evaluation subject to someone else. As the bottler for Starbucks Frappuccino and hundreds of other beverages enjoyed around the world, Pepsi is best suited to determine the shelf life of its products. If the Committee deems that it is in the best interest of Hawaii consumers to require both "sell by" and pasteurization dates on milk products, Pepsi respectfully requests that this measure apply only to 100% milk and soy milk (including flavored milk).
    [Show full text]