Interments in Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemeteries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interments in Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemeteries Department of Veterans Affairs VA-NCA-IS-1 National Cemetery Administration January 2011 Washington, DC 20420 INTERMENTS IN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) NATIONAL CEMETERIES I. VA National Cemetery Administration In 862, President Lincoln signed into law legislation authorizing the establishment of national cemeteries “. for the soldiers who shall die in the service of the country.” Fourteen cemeteries were established that year. These national cemeteries were the beginning of today’s National Cemetery Administration. After the Civil War, search and recovery teams visited hundreds of battlefields, churchyards, plantations and other locations seeking wartime interments that were made in haste. By 870, the remains of nearly 300,000 Civil War dead were reinterred in 73 national cemeteries. The National Cemetery Administration has undergone many changes since its inception. In 873, Congress extended the right of burial in a national cemetery to all honorably discharged Union Veterans of the Civil War. By a 933 Executive Order, certain national cemeteries were transferred from the War Department (now the Department of the Army) to the National Park Service of the Department of the Interior. In June 973, Public Law 93-43 authorized the transfer of 82 national cemeteries from the Department of the Army to the Veterans Administration, now the Department of Veterans Affairs. This action combined the 82 Army cemeteries with 2 cemeteries already under VA’s jurisdiction. With the addition of 29 new cemeteries since 973, and the transfer of one historic site and cemetery to the State of Kentucky, the National Cemetery Administration now comprises 3 national cemeteries. The Department of the Army still administers two national cemeteries -- Arlington and the U.S. Armed Forces Retirement Home, both in the Washington, DC area -- and the Department of Interior administers 4, for an overall total of 4 national cemeteries. In 978, Congress established the State Cemetery Grants Program (Public Law 95-476). Administered by the National Cemetery Administration to aid States and U.S. territories in the establishment, expansion and improvement of Veterans cemeteries, the State Cemetery Grants Program complements the National Cemetery Administration by providing gravesites for Veterans in those areas not adequately served by national cemeteries. State veterans cemeteries enhance VA’s ability to meet the burial needs of America’s Veterans. II. General Information 1. INTERMENT IN NATIONAL AND STATE CEMETERIES a. Burial in a national cemetery is based on military service. Requests for interment in national cemeteries should be directed to staff at the cemetery where burial is sought. A list of VA national cemeteries is provided in Section V.2 of this information sheet or on-line at http://www.cem. va.gov. The cemetery director determines eligibility for burial, usually at the time of need. Most categories of persons entitled to burial in VA national cemeteries are summarized in Section III of this information sheet. January 2011 VA-NCA-IS- b. Arlington National Cemetery is under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army. Inquiries concerning eligibility for interment there should be directed to Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. See Section V.5 of this information sheet for the address and phone number or on-line at http://www.arlingtoncemetery.org. c. The two active national cemeteries administered by the Department of the Interior -- Andersonville National Cemetery in Georgia and Andrew Johnson National Cemetery in Tennessee -- use the same eligibility criteria as the National Cemetery Administration. Addresses and telephone numbers for cemeteries administered by the Department of the Interior are provided in Section V.3 of this information sheet. d. Eligibility criteria for burial in State veterans cemeteries are the same or similar to criteria for burial in VA national cemeteries, but some States have residency requirements and other more restrictive requirements. State cemeteries should be contacted directly for information. State veterans cemeteries are listed in Section V.4 of this information sheet or on-line at http://www.cem. va.gov. 2. ASSIGNMENT OF SPACE a. The National Cemetery Administration is authorized to bury eligible individuals in any VA national cemetery with available grave space. See Section V.2 of this information sheet for a list of VA national cemeteries. b. One gravesite or columbarium niche is authorized for the interment of all eligible members of a family except where soil conditions require more than one grave, or when the number of eligible family decedents requires more than one grave, or niche. c. A gravesite is not reserved before it is needed for a burial. VA honors reservations made through 962, when cemeteries were under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army and reservations were allowed. When a death occurs and eligibility for interment in a national cemetery is determined, grave space is assigned by the cemetery director in the name of the Veteran. d. Many VA national cemeteries that have exhausted space for full-casket burials can still inter cremated remains. Occasionally, full-casket gravesites become available in these cemeteries due to disinterments or when gravesite reservations made through 962 are canceled. Contact the cemetery director for information regarding the availability of grave space. 3. ENTITLEMENT TO BURIAL BENEFITS a. There is no charge for burial in a national cemetery. Opening and closing of the grave, a headstone or marker with authorized inscription(s), and perpetual maintenance will be provided by the Government. Flat bronze, granite or marble grave markers and upright marble or granite headstones are available to mark graves in the style consistent with existing monuments at the national cemetery. Marble, granite, or bronze niche covers are used on columbarium. b. At no expense to the next of kin, VA furnishes graveliners for new graves in national cemeteries with space available. The next of kin may choose to purchase and use a private outer 2 VA-NCA-IS-1 January 2011 burial receptacle rather than use the government furnished graveliner and receive a monetary allowance equal to the average cost to the Government of a graveliner, less administrative costs. This monetary allowance will partially defray the cost of a privately purchased outer burial receptacle. Outer burial receptacles may be purchased at private expense for family members of an individual previously buried, if advance approval of the cemetery director is obtained. c. A United States flag is provided to drape the casket or accompany the urn of an eligible Veteran who was discharged from military service under conditions other than dishonorable. A burial flag may be provided by a funeral director or obtained at VA Regional Offices and most local post offices. After the service, the flag will be presented to the next of kin or close associate of the deceased. Flags may be donated to a national cemetery to be flown on appropriate days, if the cemetery has an Avenue of Flags program. VA also will issue a burial flag on behalf of a servicemember who was missing in action and later presumed dead by the military department. By law, only one flag is presented for the eligible Veteran. d. VA may not reimburse any costs associated with the burial, including transportation of the remains, of a decedent other than a Veteran. VA will pay a monetary burial and funeral expense allowance for Veterans who, at the time of death, were entitled to receive pension or compensation or would have been entitled to compensation but for receipt of military retirement pay. Eligibility for the allowance also may be established when death occurs in a VA hospital, nursing home, or domiciliary, or a hospital or nursing home with which VA contracted, and additional costs of transportation of the remains may be reimbursed in those cases. In these cases, VA will also pay the cost of transporting the remains of a service-disabled Veteran to the national cemetery with available grave space nearest his or her home. The person who bore the Veteran’s burial expenses may claim reimbursement up to prescribed limits. e. A person who dies on active duty is entitled to certain benefits from the military. Information about these benefits is available from the branch of the Armed Forces in which the person served. f. A Presidential Memorial Certificate may be requested to honor the memory of any deceased Veteran who was discharged under honorable conditions. The local VA Regional Office generally originates the first request for a Presidential Memorial Certificate. Request forms may also be accessed online at http://www.va.gov/vaforms/va/pdf/VA40-0247.pdf. Eligible recipients include next of kin, other relatives and friends. Requests should be accompanied by a copy of a document such as a military discharge certificate to establish honorable service. g. Additional information concerning reimbursement of burial expenses and other benefits by VA may be found in VA Pamphlet 80-0-01, “Federal Benefits for Veterans, Dependents and Survivors. “A copy of VA Pamphlet 80-0-01 can be obtained from most VA offices or the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or viewed on-line at http://www.va.gov/opa. 4. ARRANGING AN INTERMENT IN A VA NATIONAL CEMETERY a. Interment arrangements for an eligible Veteran or dependent are made by the funeral director or the next of kin at the time of need by contacting the national cemetery scheduling office at -800-535-1117. A dependent is buried based upon the eligibility of the Veteran. To establish the 3 January 2011 VA-NCA-IS- Veteran’s eligibility, the name of the Veteran, together with the rank; serial, service, social security, and VA claim numbers, as applicable; date and place of entry into and separation from the service; branch of service; date and place of birth; and date of death should be furnished.
Recommended publications
  • Scottsdale County Island Fire District (SCIFD)
    Item 17 CITY COUNCII REPORT Im Meeting Date; August 24, 2021 General Plan Element; Public Services & FacHities General Plan Goal; Provide a safe environment for ait citizens, visitors and private interests ACTION Adopt Resolution No. 12245 authorizing Contract No. 2021-133-COS, Intergovernmental Agreement for the renewal of Provision of Fire Protecton Services to the Scottsdale County Island Fire District (SCIFD). BACKGROUND The Arizona State Legislature passed HB2780 during the 2007 legislative session, which addresses fire protection services in unincorporated county areas that exist within boundaries of an incorporated city or town. HB2780 places requirements on cities and towns with municipal fire departments to provide fire protection services to county islands within their boundaries, when no private alternative exists. The law went into effect September 19, 2007. The legislation affected inhabited county islands within the boundaries of the City of Scottsdale. They are located in the areas of Exeter and 64^ St., Miller (Cattletrack) Road north of McDonald Road, and the area of Chaparral and 65*^ St., with a total of 39 residential parcels. A legal analysis of the law, conducted at that time by our City Attorney’s Office, concluded that the City could be required to enter into a fire protection agreement, should the residents in one or all of the county islands form a fire district and request the service. ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT Staff was notified of the intent of the county islands to form a fire district in July of 2007. The district organizers successfully petitioned the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors on March of 2008 and officially became the SCIFD in July of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Report
    November 20, 2017 TO: Arizona Department of Transportation 205 South 17th Avenue, Room 331 Mail Drop 612E Phoenix, Arizona 85007 RE: PROJECT: H088801R HIGHWAY: Red Mountain Freeway SECTION: Higley Road - US 60 ADOT PARCEL: L-M-395B PARCEL NUMBER: 219-26-096D ATTN: Mr. Jim Walcutt R/W Project Management Section RE: An appraisal report of the 5 acres of vacant residential land located northeast of the northeast corner of 76th Street and McKellips Road in unincorporated Maricopa County, Arizona. Dear Mr. Walcutt: As requested, I have appraised the aforementioned property, as of October 4, 2017, for the purpose of determining the market value. Due to the fact that the subject is vacant land with no lease encumbrances, the final opinion of value is based upon the fee simple estate. The intended users of this appraisal report are the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to utilize value estimates to assist in decisions regarding the sale or disposal of the property. The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) is our client and one of the intended users along with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This appraisal is not intended for any other use by any other users. The appraisal and report were both prepared in conformity with the appraisal requirements of the Arizona Department of Transportation, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2016- 2017 (USPAP), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as Amended (URA), as described in part 49 CFR 24.2(a)(3). This report was prepared under the Appraisal Report option of Standards Rule 2-2(a) of the 2016- 2017 edition of USPAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexations and Spheres of Influence?
    CITY OF ESCONDIDO ANNEXATION GUIDE A. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information on the process and procedure of annexation to the City of Escondido and to answer basic questions regarding the City's policies of annexing property from the County. B. WHAT IS ANNEXATION? Annexation is the process of changing a property's governmental boundaries. In the case of the City of Escondido, it involves unincorporated County of San Diego territory being included in the corporate boundaries of the City. C. WHAT IS LAFCO? The San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) was established by state law and is responsible for coordinating, directing, and overseeing logical and timely changes to local governmental boundaries, including annexation and detachment of territory, incorporation of cities, formation of special districts, and consolidation, merger, and dissolution of districts. In addition, LAFCO is charged with reviewing ways to reorganize, simplify, and streamline governmental structure. A primary objective of LAFCO is to initiate studies and furnish information that contributes to the logical and reasonable development of public agencies. LAFCO must also determine and periodically update spheres of influence for local agencies. Changes of organization are governed by the Cortese/Knox/Herxberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, as amended. For more information visit LAFCO‟s website at: www.sdlafco.org. D. WHAT IS A SPHERE OF INFLUENCE? LAFCO is required by state law to determine a sphere of influence for each city and special district in the County. A sphere of influence is a plan for the probable ultimate boundaries of a local agency.
    [Show full text]
  • VISION 2030.Pub
    Maricopa County Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Board of Supervisors Clint Hickman - District 4 (Chairman) Denny Barney - District 1 Steve Chucri - District 2 Andy Kunasek - District 3 Steve Gallardo - District 5 Planning and Zoning Commission Mark Pugmire – District 1 Michael Deutsch, District 1 Broc Hiatt, District 2 Gregg Arnett – District 2 (Vice-Chairman) Michael Cowley – District 3 Jennifer Ruby – District 3 B.J. Copeland – District 4 (Chairman) Bruce Burrows – District 4 Michael Johnson – District 5 Murray Johnson – District 5 Vision 2030 Project Team Joy Rich, AICP, Deputy County Manager Debra Stark, AICP, Director, Planning & Development Department Darren Gerard, AICP, Deputy Director, Planning & Development Department Matt Holm, AICP, Planning Supervisor (Vision 2030 Project Manager) Rachel Applegate, Planner For providing technical and professional review and expertise, special thank you to the following Maricopa County departments and agencies: Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks & Recreation Department Maricopa County Environmental Services Department Maricopa County Air Quality Department Maricopa County Human Services Department Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management Maricopa County Department of Public Health Maricopa County Office of Management & Budget Maricopa County Flood Control District Maricopa County Library District Most importantly, Maricopa County thanks all the citizens; property owners; community and business organizations; federal, state and local agencies; and all other stakeholders that pro- vided input on this plan. Thank you for your effort and commitment to helping make Vision 2030 an effective guide, and for making Maricopa County one of the best in the nation! In Memory This plan is dedicated to the memory of John Verdugo, AICP, whose contribu- tion to this plan, commitment to Maricopa County, and passion for the Planning profession will forever be remembered, respected and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • M:\ADC Construction Indicator Programs\RCB
    Footnote FOR 201599 4/21/2016 5:39:51 PM STATE COUNTY ID STATE ABBR COUNTY NAME AND PLACE and FOOTNOTE ----- ---- ------ ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 001 409000 AL Autauga County Prattville The main portion of Prattville city located in Autauga County issues the permits for the other portion in Elmore County. 01 003 034000 AL Baldwin County Baldwin County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Elberta, Magnolia Springs and Perdido Beach towns. 01 007 365900 AL Bibb County Woodstock town The main portion of Woodstock town located in Bibb County issues the permits for the other portion in Tuscaloosa County. 01 015 383000 AL Calhoun County Oxford The main portion of Oxford city located in Calhoun County issues the permits for the other portion in Talladega County. 01 015 398000 AL Calhoun County Piedmont The main portion of Piedmont city located in Calhoun County issues the permits for the other portion in Cherokee County. 01 031 155000 AL Coffee County Enterprise The main portion of Enterprise city located in Coffee County issues the permits for the other portion in Dale County. 01 033 299000 AL Colbert County Littleville town Permit system discontinued (2015). 01 043 195000 AL Cullman County Garden City town The main portion of Garden City town located in Cullman County issues the permits for the other portion in Blount County. 01 045 401000 AL Dale County Pinckard town Permit system discontinued (2015). 01 047 129000 AL Dallas County Dallas County Unincorporated Area Permit system also covers Orrville town. 01 049 106000 AL DeKalb County Collinsville town The main portion of Collinsville town located in DeKalb County issues the permits for the other portion in Cherokee County.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Laramie Park History, 1834 – 1977
    Fort Laramie NHS: Park History Fort Laramie Park History, 1834-1977 FORT LARAMIE PARK HISTORY 1834-1977 by Merrill J. Mattes September 1980 Rocky Mountain Regional Office National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior TABLE OF CONTENTS fola/history/index.htm Last Updated: 01-Mar-2003 file:///C|/Web/FOLA/history/index.htm [9/7/2007 12:41:47 PM] Fort Laramie NHS: Park History Fort Laramie Park History, 1834-1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Author's Preface Part I. FORT LARAMIE, 1834 - 1890 I Introduction II Fur Trappers Discover the Oregon Trail III Fort William, the First Fort Laramie IV Fort John, the Second Fort Laramie V Early Migrations to Oregon and Utah VI Fort Laramie, the U.S. Army, and the Forty-Niners VII The Great California Gold Rush VIII The Indian Problem: Treaty and Massacre IX Overland Transportation and Communications X Uprising of the Sioux and Cheyenne XI Red Cloud's War XII Black Hills Gold and the Sioux Campaigns XIII The Cheyenne-Deadwood Stage Road XIV Decline and Abandonment XV Evolution of the Military Post XVI Fort Laramie as Country Village and Historic Ruin Part II. THE CRUSADE TO SAVE FORT LARAMIE I The Crusade to Save Fort Laramie Footnotes to Part II file:///C|/Web/FOLA/history/contents.htm (1 of 2) [9/7/2007 12:41:48 PM] Fort Laramie NHS: Park History Part III. THE RESTORATION OF FORT LARAMIE 1. Interim State Custodianship 1937-1938 - Greenburg, Rymill and Randels 2. Early Federal Custodianship 1938-1939 - Mattes, Canfield, Humberger and Fraser 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostille Colorado
    Apostille Colorado Barer and Constantinian Ollie subtend her acquests gears plunges and overscored effectively. Rodge joint erratically while hepatic Bay reverberate idiopathically or copes piratically. Shaped Gearard immured: he monopolises his barley-bree democratically and inculpably. Overview Coronavirus COVID-19 Visa Information Passports and ID Cards German Citizenship Family Matters Certifications Notarizations and Apostille. Apostilles authenticate the seals and signatures of officials on public documents such low birth certificates notarized documents court orders or opening other. Colorado Apostille apostille example The Colorado Secretary of State issues two types of authentications of public documents apostilles and. How do Obtain a Colorado Apostille or Authentication by the Colorado Secretary State in Denver of a Notarized Document Birth Certificate Marriage. Authentication Request Form Apostille or Certificate is common legal document that was released by the Colorado Secretary of dog a government authority. Colorado Notary Handbook. Obtaining an Apostille 123 Apostille. ApostilleCertificationaspx COLORADO httpwwwsosstatecouspubsnotary. Apostilleinfopdf. Apostilles and Authentications For Documents notarized by a Colorado Notary Public and documents certified by a Colorado Public Official Documents. L Obtaining Colorado Driving Record Apostille Colorado certified copies of driving records are arrest only credential the Division of Motor Vehicles. How police obtain an Apostille or Certificate of Authentication. Denver Colorado Apostille Share Tweet Pin Mail SMS Colorado Apostille Our Denver Colorado Apostille office is located in Downtown Denver Our Denver office. Denver Colorado Apostille International Apostille Services. Do you continue to do you have directed her deputies are fiduciary duties? Colorado State Apostille ONLY 5000 per Document processing Time 2-4 Business Days DC Apostille offers competitive pricing and discounts for regular.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
    Chandler • Arizona 2019 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Regular Meetings January 16, 2019 February 20, 2019 March 6, 2019 April 3, 2019 April 17 2019 May 1, 2019 Cancelled May 15 2019 June 5, 2019 June 19, 2019 July 3, 2019 Cancelled July 17, 2019 August 7, 2019 Cancelled August 21, 2019 September 4, 2019 October 2, 2019 October 16, 2019 November 20, 2019 December 4 2019 (not available yet) December 18, 2019 (not available yet) These minutes are fully searchable within this year by using the “Find Feature”. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHANDLER, ARIZONA, January 16, 2019, held in the City Council Chambers, 88 E. Chicago Street. 1. Chairman Wastchak called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Klob. 3. The following Commissioners answered Roll Call: Chairman Devan Wastchak Commissioner Robert Klob Commissioner George Kimble Commissioner David Rose Commissioner Gregg Pekau Commissioner Matt Eberle Vice Chairman Rick Heumann was absent. Also present: Mr. Kevin Mayo, Planning Administrator Mr. David de la Torre, Planning Manager Ms. Susan Fiala, City Planner Ms. Lauren Schumann, Sr. Planner Ms. Kristine Gay, Sr. Planner Ms. Jenny Winkler, City Attorney Ms. Cathy Flores, Clerk 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOVED BY COMMISSIONER PEKAU, seconded by COMMISSIONER EBERLE to approve the minutes of the December 5, 2018 Planning Commission Hearing. The motion passed 4-0. Both COMMISSIONER KIMBLE and COMMISSIONER PEKAU were absent at the December 5, 2018 Planning and Commission Hearing and abstained from the vote. 5. ACTION ITEMS: CHAIRMAN W ASTCHAK informed the audience prior to the meeting, Commission and Staff met in an open Study Session to discuss each of the items on the consent agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Bi-Monthly by the State Historical Society of Colorado
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published bi-monthly by The State Historical Society of Colorado VOL. XI Denver, Colorado, March, 1934 No. 2 Catching Wild Horses HOMER HOYT* Having been asked by a representative of the Colorado State Historical Rociety to cl('serilJP the method of catching wild horses. f will endeavor to do so. As the wild horse is almost a thing of the past, soon there will be no one living competent to describe the process authoritatively. There are few men now living who have had a very wide experience in catching wild horses. Among them I will mention two whom I consider the very highest authority, Mr. Thomas A. Hightower, now living in California, and Mr. Wal­ ter Harris Brown. I do not know the whereabouts of Mr. Brown. At last report, in the late '90s, he was at Cripple Creek, Colorado, with a herd of burros to sell to the miners. I received my first tutelage from Mr. Jerry McGahan, com­ monly known throughout the United States as "Wild Horse" .Terry. He usually corralled his horses either at his home ranch five miles west of Pawnee Buttes, Weld County, Colorado, or at Indian Cave, twenty miles east of the Buttes. In the summer of 1886 Bob and Tom Hightower went to the Panhandle of 'l'exas, chased around all summer and caught noth­ ing, although they both were first class wild horse men. The reason for failure was shortage of saddle stock. In the spring of 1887 the brothers asked mr to join them as I had several saddle horses.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sand Creek to Somalia: Black Bodies in Denver's
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 4-17-2017 FROM SAND CREEK TO SOMALIA: BLACK BODIES IN DENVER’S POST-INDUSTRIAL URBAN CULTURAL RE-IMAGINATION Webster Matjaka Mr. University of New Mexico Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds Part of the American Material Culture Commons, American Popular Culture Commons, and the Other American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Matjaka, Webster Mr.. "FROM SAND CREEK TO SOMALIA: BLACK BODIES IN DENVER’S POST-INDUSTRIAL URBAN CULTURAL RE-IMAGINATION." (2017). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/amst_etds/53 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Webster Matjaka Candidate American Studies Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Alex Lubin, Chairperson Dr. Alyosha Goldstein Dr. Kirsten Buick Dr. Michael Trujillo FROM SAND CREEK TO SOMALIA: BLACK BODIES IN DENVER’S POST- INDUSTRIAL URBAN CULTURAL RE-IMAGINATION By Webster Matjaka B.A., Communications, Waldorf College, 1998 M.A., Communication Studies, University of Northern Iowa, 2001 M.S., Political Science, University of Oregon, 2006 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy American Studies The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2017 iii Dedication For my late mother, Asia Matjaka and my late father, John Matjaka.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Coverage
    Search Description Bankruptcies Returns a variety of information which may include debtor name & address, additional debtors, file numbers and dates, court locations, assets & liability amounts & type of bankruptcy. Tax Liens Return may include all tax liens, docket numbers, amounts of liens, court locations, SSN or FEIN & address of debtor. Judgments Returns judgment date, court location, initial amount, filing type, docket number, plaintiff information, and address on file for debtor. Coverage Bankruptcies Coverage for this search is nationwide. Judgments and Tax Liens Data updates vary based on population. Larger cities may be updated weekly while rural areas may only be updated annually. Alaska Aleutians East Borough, Anchorage Municipality, Bethel Census Area, Bristol Bay Borough, Denali Borough, Dillingham Census Area, Fairbanks North Star Borough, Haines Borough, Juneau City and Borough, Kenai Peninsula Borough, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Kodiak Island Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough/Palmer, Nome Census Area, North Slope Borough, Northwest Arctic Borough, Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Census Area, Sitka City and Borough, Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, Valdez-Cordova Census Area, Wade Hampton Census Area, Wrangell-Petersburg Census Area, Yakutat City and Borough, Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area Alabama Autauga County, Baldwin County, Barbour County, Bibb County, Blount County, Bullock County, Butler County, Calhoun County, Chambers County, Cherokee County, Chilton County, Choctaw County, Clarke County, Clay County, Cleburne County,
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Environmental Analysis
    5. Environmental Analysis 5.11 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section addresses utilities and service systems including: Water Supply and Distribution Systems, Wastewater Treatment and Collection, Solid Waste, and Dry Utilities. Storm Drainage Systems are addressed in Section 5.5, Hydrology and Water Quality. The analysis in this section is based in part on the following technical reports: • The Platinum Triangle Drainage Study, Merit Civil Engineering, Inc., September 2004 (Appendix F) • The Platinum Triangle Water Supply Assessment, PSOMAS, February 3, 2005 (Appendix K) • Hydraulic Network Analysis for the City of Anaheim Platinum Triangle, City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division, February 11, 2005 (Appendix K) • Platinum Triangle Sewer Study, Merit Civil Engineering, Inc., October 2004, First Revision January 2005 (Appendix L) A copy of these studies is included in the Technical Appendices to this DSEIR. In addition, the following documents were utilized in the preparation of this analysis and are available for review at the City of Anaheim Planning Department. • The Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement • Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle • City of Anaheim General Plan Furthermore, public service questionnaires were sent out to relevant agencies and their responses were used in this analysis (Appendix I). 5.11.1 Water Supply and Distribution Systems 5.11.1.1 Environmental Setting With the exception of several small areas bordering the City Limits, the Anaheim Public Utilities Department provides water service throughout the City. The system includes approximately 749 miles of water mains, 61,500 active water meters and over 7,800 fire hydrants.
    [Show full text]