Committee's Final Report (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Committee's Final Report (PDF) SNOHOMISH COUNTY PAINE FIELD REPORT ON MEDIATED ROLE DETERMINATION FOR PAINE FIELD MAY 16, 2007 PETER CAMP Executive Director Office of County Executive Aaron Reardon TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................3 MRD ...................................................................................................................................................................5 CHANGES ........................................................................................................................................................8 Milestones since 1978..........................................................................................................................9 Additional Runway .................................................................................................................9 Airport Master Planning......................................................................................................10 Other Changes ......................................................................................................................10 2002 Economic Stimulus Action Plan ............................................................................................10 UPDATING THE MRD DOCUMENT ...................................................................................................12 1978 MRD DOCUMENT.............................................................................................................................15 1979 MRD DOCUMENT.............................................................................................................................22 UPDATED 1978 MRD DOCUMENT (Legislative Format)..................................................................32 UPDATED 1979 MRD DOCUMENT (Legislative Format)..................................................................39 UPDATED 1978 MRD DOCUMENT ......................................................................................................44 UPDATED 1979 MRD DOCUMENT .....................................................................................................49 KAPLAN KIRSCH ROCKWELL MEMORANDUM ...........................................................................51 COUNTY COUNCIL ACTIONS ...............................................................................................................83 Motion 89-059 (February 21, 1989).................................................................................................84 Joint Resolution 92-010 (March 18, 1992)......................................................................................88 Joint Resolution 94-013 (September 21, 1994)..............................................................................90 Motion 01-255 (2001)........................................................................................................................92 Motion 02-453 (2002)........................................................................................................................94 COMMUNITY PANEL ............................................................................................................................. 108 MEETINGS.................................................................................................................................................. 109 COMMUNITY PANEL MEMBERS’ VIEWS....................................................................................... 110 AJ Chase ........................................................................................................................................... 110 Don Doran....................................................................................................................................... 110 Tom Gaffney ................................................................................................................................... 110 Gary Haakenson.............................................................................................................................. 110 Tom Hoban...................................................................................................................................... 111 Lori Kaiser........................................................................................................................................ 111 Kevin Laverty................................................................................................................................... 112 Michelle Robles ............................................................................................................................... 113 John Shaw......................................................................................................................................... 113 1 of 188 Ray Stephanson ............................................................................................................................... 114 Hugh Townsend.............................................................................................................................. 114 Mark Wolken ................................................................................................................................... 115 COMMUNITY PANEL MEETING MINUTES.................................................................................. 116 November, 1 2005........................................................................................................................... 116 March 2, 2006 .................................................................................................................................. 120 April 6, 2006..................................................................................................................................... 125 April 20, 2006................................................................................................................................... 129 May 4, 2006 ...................................................................................................................................... 133 May 18, 2006.................................................................................................................................... 140 June 1, 2006...................................................................................................................................... 147 June 15, 2006.................................................................................................................................... 152 October 18, 2006............................................................................................................................. 158 November 9, 2006........................................................................................................................... 159 November 30, 2006 ........................................................................................................................ 163 December 14, 2006 ......................................................................................................................... 168 DORAN PROPOSAL................................................................................................................................. 174 SHAW/WOLKEN/TOWNSEND PROPOSAL.................................................................................. 185 2 of 188 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1978, the University Of Washington Office Of Environmental Mediation convened a panel to recommend the future role of the Snohomish County Airport (Paine Field). The “mediated role determination” (MRD) panel suggested that general aviation and commercial aeronautical work (such as Boeing’s Everett plant) be the dominant uses of Paine Field. The MRD Panel recommended encouraging those uses, and discouraged any usages incompatible with community harmony. In late 1978 and early 1979, the Snohomish County Planning Commission adopted the recommendations and forwarded them to the County Commissioners who adopted the recommendations with few changes. These two documents are colloquially known as the “MRD Document”. The community and aviation business changed dramatically in the past quarter century. Population zoomed. Aeronautical technologies improved, with larger jets becoming quieter. Environmental and land use and planning laws became ever more stringent. The form of County government changed from a commission system (in which the commissioners handle both the legislative and executive functions of government) to an executive/council form of government (in which the executive leads, provides policy direction, and operates the government while an elected council decides overarching policy issues and approves the budget). The 1980s saw many fights around the country between local jurisdictions and the aviation industry over noise and other impacts from a burgeoning scheduled passenger air service industry. Those fights led the federal government to pre-empt local attempts to control the type, frequency, and noise of scheduled passenger air service. After booming through the 1990s, the economy saw a downturn with the dawn of the 21st century. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City exacerbated the economic problems. Boeing laid off thousands. The County Council and then County Executive Bob Drewel formed a task force to develop methods of stimulating the local economy. The task force
Recommended publications
  • Comments to Paine Field Airport; They Have Been Noted
    SnohoniLt 1) • 17’ 1 J ,4$~ic~ Comments Countvkitport u amer len ~F Environtuental Assessinen~ ~~S4LW, LOft. 9~t7f NSCtEwJ cn~, cc~c i2~k ~u u~ COMMENTS: A~ 4o~i-c ~M ~—Tw*~ C Ia Dave Waggoner Cayla Morgan Director Environmental Protection Spedalist Snohomish County Airport Seattle Airports District Office Comments to 3220 100th Street Southwest or Federal Aviation Administration Everett, Washington 98204 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Barnard Dunkelberg >? Company Email. [email protected] Renton, Washington 98057-3356 BridgeNet International Email. [email protected] Synergy Consultants Gibson Traffic Consultants Thank You! D.1 Response to Comment Dear Jeanne and George Dalton: Thank you for your comments to Paine Field Airport; they have been noted. D.2 -Original Message— From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:40 PM To: Waggoner, Dave; Dolan, Bill; Ryk Dunkelberg; Ryan Hayes Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Roland. J.McKee@faa . gov Subject: Fw: Paine Field review Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 425—227—2653 Forwarded by Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA on 01/20/2010 04:38 PM I > From: I I > I > IStephen Dana <[email protected]> > > I To: I > I > Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA@FAA I > > Date: I > > 101/20/2010 03:22 PM > > Subject: I > > IPaine Field review > D.3 January 19, 2010 Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airport District Office, FAA 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 Ms. Morgan, The matter of commercial air service at Paine field is up for environmental review before your office in the coming weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 3, 1980 I WASHINGTON, D.C
    THE whl7”c hci;Sg 1 TiiE OAiLY DIARY OF PREStDENt JIMMY CARSER 1 SF--.- ! Loc.xrIoN 3AsE &to.. Day. Yt.1 me. f THE WHITE HOUSE NOVEMBER 3, 1980 i WASHINGTON, D.C. TIX E DAY . -*: L 5:00 a.m. MONDAY I R I The President received a wake up call from the White House f signal board operator. I 5:18 i R The President talked on a conference line with: , I Edmund S. Muskie, Secretary of State I warren M. Christopher, Deputy Secretary of State 5 :*20 597 P‘ The President talked with his Press Secretary, Joseph L. "Jody" iI Powell. 5 = 31 5 = 35 P The President talked with Hamilton Jordan, Deputy Campaign Chairman, Carter Mondale Presidential Committee, Inc. 5:50 f The President went to the Oval Office. 5:50 5:51 P The President talked with Charles H. Kirbo, partner with King I t and Spalding law firm, Atlanta, Georgia. i 6~26 ; P The President telephoned the First Lady. The call was not I I completed. I I I 7:02 / 7:Og R 1 The President talked with the First Lady. I ; The President met with: 8:oo 1 8:18 Mr. Powell 8:oo 1 8:18 Gerald M. Rafshoon, President, Rafshoon Communications, ! I I I Washington, D.C. 8:oo 1 8:18 Patrick J. Caddell, President, Cambridge Survey, I I Cambridge, Massachusetts Mr. Kirbo Jack H. Watson, Jr., Chief of Staff Mr. Jordan a:18 The President went to the Cabinet Room. He was accompanied by: Mr. Watson Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington
    Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington Published Visual Flight Rules (VFR) routes for arrivals and departures. Project Background The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cancelled two existing VFR routes for aircraft landing and departing King County International Airport-Boeing Field (KBFI) and replaced them with newly defined routes (retaining some of the existing names). The term “routes” can best be described in this instance as a “set of pre-coordinated instructions” that is given to VFR pilots. The routes enhance safety by increasing separation between arrival and departure flows into KBFI, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA), and Renton Municipal Airport (KRNT). Purpose of Changes There have been Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) events involving VFR aircraft arriving and departing KBFI, and these routes are intended to reduce TCAS events and enhance safety. TCAS monitors the airspace around an aircraft for other aircraft equipped with proper equipment, independent of air traffic control, and warns pilots of the presence of other properly equipped aircraft in the immediate area. Project Description The project results in a change to past operating procedures by publishing several existing routes for VFR aircraft to use when arriving and departing from either runway configuration at KBFI. KBFI Airport Traffic Control Tower (BFI ATCT) now has the ability to assign published routes rather than issuing tailored instructions. The new VFR routes provide better predictability, enhance safety, and improve the segregation of aircraft arriving and departing KBFI. What Changed The new VFR routes follow pre-existing air traffic flight tracks that are assigned by BFI ATCT and no new areas will experience new air traffic overflights.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP O a CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP T S LO U Spencer G H Island
    Ebey Island S TE AM B CITY OF EVERETT BICYCLE MAP O A CITY OF EVERETT BICYCLE MAP T S LO U Spencer G H Island Smith Island 9 2 5 W L E A R Y G E O R S O H N A U LEGEND SE R UNIO N SLO UG H Bicycle repair sta�on J O Recreation* H N S S M O I N S GH T LOU H S L ** O Commuter D U D Jetty V G L H Island B 4 LEGION S (! N N N O H Parks PARK H O O G M S I S S I H E D R M R R I V E Central Business District O B E R G V (!3 H L R A O E Smith N Island E Everett Everett City Limits S IV Community B R L ! College N ( Points of Interest Y A 1 A R (! W D I0 Transit D T A OWER S O LANGUS W T R RIVERFRONT E B I PARK N a Police Stations V 10TH S T I0 c (!6 5 E College (! N I Station VE R A A T 12TH S M T 26TH ST (!7 W DOWNTOWNOY EVERETT CENTRAL BH USINESS DISTRICT (!2 EVERETT AVE 16TH ST City of Everett VE Oxidation Pond R 15 VE E (! 9 A Y A (! D V A D Biosolids B A H Pad G R U W BY O S L EW VE S I VE BA A T N E 19TH OL AD ST V South I O A KE I E V N Spencer M C D O M U E Island E G A Aeration R V Pond N M R OA N D LO A I HEW S U IT BR A T A VE A N KE N O S H N O A C (!14 M AR D I S R GR H U R M A 10 G I R (! V V Smith 11 E 2 R Island 12 (! 3RD ST E W (! (!16 WALL ST (!13 a !17 H ( G cC LOU S BO AT PACIFIC AVE S TEAM EVERETT AVE Y E T Y AVE V S A W A A T IL L HEW E A ITT AVE U R A L B N N I P D T E E ADW M A AT Everett T ER S V S R D LOU G US 2 M H £ E S ¤ R A 0 0.5 1 T PACIFIC AVEStation E Y H E T C B Miles S D N L U I0 !8 V O ( S L A D C M B S I F T .
    [Show full text]
  • Starbucks Hangar Facility OFFERING
    Starbucks Hangar Facility OFFERING 6771 PERIMETER ROAD S, SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98108 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of Starbucks Corporation, Kinzer Real Estate (“KRES”) has been retained to present to qualified parties the opportunity to purchase its leasehold interest (the “Offering”) in its current corporate hangar facility at King County International Airport (“KCIA”). Due to its increased international business and corresponding increase in travel requirements, Starbucks required an expansion of its fleet and hangar facility that its current hangar site could not accommodate. In November 2011, Starbucks secured a new lease with King County at a parcel that will accommodate its future aviation requirements, and as a result is looking to dispose of its current hangar upon completion of its new hangar. The Offering provides the rare opportunity to secure long-term access to an existing, operational hangar facility at KCIA at a favorable economic cost to potential alternatives. The Offering consists of Starbucks’ leasehold interest in an aviation hangar facility located at 6771-A Perimeter Road at KCIA. The facility consists of 14,154 square feet of improvements upon 44,252 square feet of land owned by King County. The interest is secured via sublease with Master Lessee King County Jet Center (“KCJC”), which leases the land directly from KCIA. Starbucks’ lease term is coterminous with KCJC’s lease term. Starbucks’ sublease provides for extensions coterminous with extensions of the Master Lease. Although the Master Lease does not provide KCJC with specific renewal rights, KCIA customarily renews ground leases with responsible ground lessees that professionally maintain and operate existing hangar facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps
    Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps DAVID FLECKENSTEIN, AVIATION DIRECTOR Washington State Transportation Commission Meeting March 16, 2021 Planning for the Next Aviation Revolution • Electric aircraft are flying today and new companies are entering the market every day – Approximately 215 models under development • WSDOT completed a one year consultant led study on the potential impacts of electric aircraft for Washington State in November 2020 • This technology has the potential to open up new markets for air travel while reducing greenhouse gas emissions • Planning for implementation of electric aviation is key to successful adoption 2 Electric Aviation in Washington Washington State could become the epicenter for electric aircraft • Development • magniX, headquartered in Redmond, is developing the next generation of aircraft propulsion with its electric engines • Testing • AeroTEC is currently flight testing a Cessna Caravan converted to electric propulsion with a magniX engine at Grant County International Airport in Moses Lake • Manufacturing • Recently announced that Eviation plans to assemble the Alice at Arlington Municipal Airport o Alice utilizes the magniX engines 3 Washington Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study - Study Areas of Emphasis • Identification of current and projected airport infrastructure improvement needs to accommodate electric aircraft • Evaluation of projected economic impact resulting from increased access to air transportation • Demand forecasting for electric propulsion regional passenger air
    [Show full text]
  • PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024
    FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 CONTACT US KATRIN GIST CBRE, Inc. Associate 10885 NE 4th Street +1 206 947 1399 Suite 500 [email protected] Bellevue, Washington 98004 www.cbre.com/bellevue FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR HANGAR FEATURES PRICE: $680,000 This 5,625 sq. ft. aircraft hangar is an attractive option for those looking for an alternative to Boeing Field. Recently built in 2007, the hangar still feels new and offers a comfortable build-out that could be used for a variety of aviation purposes. Serving as a general aviation, industrial and commercial airport for the North Puget Sound region only 29 minutes north of Seattle, Paine Field provides a wide variety of aviation and industrial facilities, services and activities. It is ideal for the Northwest aircraft owner/operator. + 75 ft. x 75 ft. + 22 ft. clear height + 75 ft. wide hydroswing door + Radiant heat + Insulated + High bay halogen lighting + Sprinkler fire suppression system + Electrical system including 100 amps: − 110 and 220V + Security card gate access + Includes 350 sq. ft. office, bathroom and shower + Ground lease through May 31, 2041 with 15 year extension option UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 BUILDING D SITE PLAN BUILDING D FLOOR PLAN UNIT D103 Not to scale FOR SALE UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST PAINE FIELD HANGAR Everett, Washington 98024 AERIAL MAP 9800 29th AVENUE WEST UNIT D103 © 2015 CBRE, Inc. The information contained in this document has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While CBRE, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram
    12096 EVERETT/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY (PAINE FIELD) (PAE) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-142 (FAA) EVERETT, WASHINGTON ATIS 128.65 BOEING PAINE TOWER PLANT 120.2 256.7 (East of RWY 16L-34R) 132.95 256.7 (West of RWY 16R-34L) GND CON 121.8 339.8 200 X CLNC DEL 220 126.75 AA ELEV 16R 563 A1 K1 162.0^ ILS ILS HOLD HOLD A 47^55'N BOEING 9010 X 150 A2 RAMP RWY 11-29 S-30 RWY 16L-34R S-12.5 A3 RWY 16R-34L NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV S-100, D-200, 2S-175 TWR CUSTOMS 2D-350, 2D/2D2-830 11 A4 787 B .A OUTER ELEV RAMP VAR 17.1^ E 561 NORTH 117.0^ C RAMP INNER C1 JANUARY 2010 D1 RAMP TERMINAL ELEV A5 16L D-3 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE D-3 4514 X 75 C 597 0.2^ W X G1 F1 A6 X D2 CENTRAL X G2 F2 HS 1 RAMP X D3 162.5^ X H D 3000 X 75 A X X X D40.9% UP G3 EAST WEST X X RAMP RAMP W3 X NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV FIRE F X STATION 297.0^ D5 FIELD K7 A7 E G4 ELEV F4 ELEV A8 SOUTH 29 600 606 RAMP G 342.5^ 47^54'N 342.0^ G5 A G6 HS 2 F6 A9 A 34R ELEV ELEV 578 596 A10 34L 400 X 220 HS 3 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
    [Show full text]
  • Snohomish County, Washington State
    Be Here Snohomish County, Washington State Sophisticated research and manufacturing technologies with proximity to a major urban center. We work for business, yours should Be Here. ADVOCATE • DEVELOP • CONNECT CENTER OF INNOVATION Our diverse industrial base, technological prowess, and strategic location Snohomish position Snohomish County at the center of innovation. County Global Center for Aerospace and Advanced Manufacturing Snohomish County is home to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, their new $1 billion Composite Wing Center, and 200+ companies that help produce 747, 767, 777/X, and 787 aircraft. Key companies in Snohomish County include Crane, Korry Seattle, WA Electronics, MTorres, Collins Aerospace, Senior plc, Panasonic and Safran. Designated by the State as the Center of its Medical Device Industry Two international leaders in ultrasound, Philips and Fujifilm Sonosite, have headquarters and manufacturing here. In addition to devices, our life science cluster includes biopharmaceutical firms AGC Biologics, Seattle Genetics and Juno Therapeutics. Providence Regional Medical Center Everett gives access to 1 in 5 Jobs clinical trial opportunities at facilities throughout their 50 hospital system. in Snohomish County are associated with manufacturing Snohomish County Attracts Tech and Creative Companies Fluke Corporation (and its Fortune 500 parent, Fortive) have their headquarters and operations here, as do Zumiez (retail/clothing), Premera Blue Cross (insurance), and Funko (toys). T-Mobile, Google, Amazon and AT&T all have a significant presence as well. Microsoft, Expedia, Facebook, Nintendo, Big Fish Games and Apple are in the region. WORKFORCE TAXES & Snohomish County has the highest concentration of advanced INCENTIVES manufacturing jobs west of the Rocky Mountains. Manufacturing is 20% of our county workforce; twice the State average.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottsdale County Island Fire District (SCIFD)
    Item 17 CITY COUNCII REPORT Im Meeting Date; August 24, 2021 General Plan Element; Public Services & FacHities General Plan Goal; Provide a safe environment for ait citizens, visitors and private interests ACTION Adopt Resolution No. 12245 authorizing Contract No. 2021-133-COS, Intergovernmental Agreement for the renewal of Provision of Fire Protecton Services to the Scottsdale County Island Fire District (SCIFD). BACKGROUND The Arizona State Legislature passed HB2780 during the 2007 legislative session, which addresses fire protection services in unincorporated county areas that exist within boundaries of an incorporated city or town. HB2780 places requirements on cities and towns with municipal fire departments to provide fire protection services to county islands within their boundaries, when no private alternative exists. The law went into effect September 19, 2007. The legislation affected inhabited county islands within the boundaries of the City of Scottsdale. They are located in the areas of Exeter and 64^ St., Miller (Cattletrack) Road north of McDonald Road, and the area of Chaparral and 65*^ St., with a total of 39 residential parcels. A legal analysis of the law, conducted at that time by our City Attorney’s Office, concluded that the City could be required to enter into a fire protection agreement, should the residents in one or all of the county islands form a fire district and request the service. ANALYSIS & ASSESSMENT Staff was notified of the intent of the county islands to form a fire district in July of 2007. The district organizers successfully petitioned the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors on March of 2008 and officially became the SCIFD in July of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • PAE), and Propeller Airports Formed a Public/Private Partnership to Develop the First Greenfield Airport Terminal in the US in Over 20 Years
    SNOHOMISH COUNTY Snohomish County Government, which owns Paine Field Airport (PAE), and Propeller Airports formed a Public/Private Partnership to develop the first greenfield airport terminal in the US in over 20 years. Propeller negotiated a 30-year ground lease (with options) on which to fund, build and operate a terminal. The terminal was developed coincident with Propeller securing service by Alaska Airlines and United Airlines, including 24 non-stop flights from PAE to nine western US cities. The first flight in March 2019 was the result of decades of effort, requiring significant leadership to deliver this critical new service to the Puget Sound region. The project required extensive environmental study and long-term public engagement. This $40 million project created 300 direct jobs and an estimated 1,000 indirect jobs. As of January 1, 2020, the terminal has served an estimated 850,000 passengers. Flights to Spokane and Palm Springs were added by Alaska Airlines in Q4 2019, bringing total destinations to eleven. Future passenger growth can be accommodated by up-sizing from the current Embraer 175. The terminal is designed with passengers in mind, emphasizing convenience and quality. On an average day, it takes under 30 minutes to get from curb to gate. Arriving passengers can reach baggage claim or their car in less than five minutes. Flights from PAE significantly reduce the carbon footprint that drivers generate while in traffic to Sea-Tac International Airport. A projected 1.2 million annual travelers utilizing PAE reduce the associated congestion on I- 5/I-405 and other major highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbcworldwide.Com 206 5957232 Bob Fredrickson [email protected] 425 8851111 Bill Abbott OFFICE
    DANFORTH RUCKER AVENUE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SITE $3,100,000 CBCWORLDWIDE.COM 3826 Rucker Avenue Everett, WA 98201 OFFERING: FOR SALE Prime 1.06 acre Multi-Family Development Site located just south of Downtown Everett. Potential to build a 159 unit / 184,787 Gross SF Multi-Family Building. OFFICE Bill Abbott 425 885 1111 [email protected] Bob Fredrickson 206 595 7232 [email protected] ©2020 Coldwell Banker. All Rights Reserved. Coldwell Banker and the Coldwell Banker Commercial logos are trademarks of Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC. The COLDWELL BANKER COMMERCIAL Coldwell Banker® System is comprised of company owned offices which are owned by a subsidiary of Realogy Brokerage Group LLC and franchised offices whichare independently owned and operated. The Coldwell Banker System fully supports the principles of the Equal Opportunity Act. DANFORTH 11300 Pinehurst Way NE, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98125 206.971.8800 RUCKER AVENUE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SITE 3826 Rucker Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 SALE Price $3,100,000 Property Rucker Multi-Family Site Type Land Subtype Multifamily The current zoning is E-1 and the Zoning anticipated rezone is MU Parcel Numbers 0057880010-8800, 0702, 8000,7800 Lot Size 1.06 Acre (46,174 SF) Number of Lots 4 Jurisdiction City of Everett Area Description: Everett is one of the core cities comprising the Seattle metropolitan area. Primary employers are Boeing, Providence Medical and the Everett Naval Station. The property • Proximity to major employers including: Boeing, Providence Medical, State of is located less than a mile south of Downtown Everett on Rucker Avenue. Easy access to Washington, Naval Station Everett, Fluke Corporation, The Everett Clinic, bus service and Everett Station which has Sounder train service to Downtown Seattle.
    [Show full text]