Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, Oe, Sc National Assembly Speeches

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, Oe, Sc National Assembly Speeches LINDEN FORBES SAMPSON BURNHAM, O.E., S.C. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEECHES VOLUME 1 September 1957 - November 1958 1 Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, O.E., S.C. National Assembly Speeches Volume 1 With a Preface by Hon. Raphael G.C.Trotman, M.P. This edition © The Caribbean Press, 2013 Preface © Hon. Raphael G.C. Trotman, M.P., 2012 Cover design by Peepal Tree Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without permission. This publication was made possible by the support of the Peepal Tree Press (Leeds). ISBN 978-1-907493-38-6 2 PREFACE The Hon. Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, O.E. S.C., M.P., L.L.B., had a long and illustrious legislative career which began in 1957 when he served as Leader of the Opposition and as leader of the People’s National Con- gress, and ended in 1980 when he metamorphosed from Prime Minister into Guyana’s first Executive President. His speeches, interventions and statements in the Legislative Assembly, and later the National Assembly of the Parliament of Guyana, are as many as they are legendary. In reading these speeches the reader will immediately identify the following: that Forbes Burnham was an extraordinary orator and debater; that he revelled in his role as a legislator; and that he treated his parliamentary colleagues, and especially his political opponents, with respect and dignity deserving of their offices. I highlight these qualities because they are important traits and characteristics that every elected Member of Parliament, and those as- piring to be, should possess. Reading the spoken words of the fathers and mothers of our nation in- evitably causes one to imagine the life of those times and to want to rekin- dle their dreams. So it was for me as I read and thoroughly enjoyed, speeches and presentations made by Mr. Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, O.E., S.C. in the Legislative Assembly of British Guiana. In the Legislative Assembly, Forbes Burnham deploys every literary and emotive device to masterfully drive home his points like a skilled swords- man; dissecting, cutting and parrying, lunging, attacking and counterat- tacking; all of which is done without the ridicule, rancour, or the rigmarole that sometimes characterises the debates in the National Assembly; more frequently than is desired. In reading these “manuscripts” many thoughts entered my mind as was revealed by the words themselves. Firstly, there was a high degree of re- spect and camaraderie between political opponents Forbes Burnham and Dr. Cheddi Jagan. Secondly, the passion and zeal to put the country and its people first, was very evident. Thirdly, the sittings and deliberations with the Legislative Assembly were not only of an extraordinary high standard, they were relevant to the hap- penings of the day. This can be seen in the debates on the provision and distribution of Government lands and housing for the poor and needy; the regulation of private schools; the care and welfare of housekeepers leaving for Canada; or the protection of hire purchasers. Fourthly, and lastly, the Members of the Legislative Assembly so obviously recognised and relished the privilege bestowed on them as elected custodians of the people’s trust, that they approached their work with remarkable dignity; respected the instruction of the Legislative Assembly; and understood the importance of 3 the vocation of parliamentarians. I implore the readers of these fine speeches therefore not to read them for entertainment only, but for learning and edi- fication. The great civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., famously, and rightly proclaimed many years ago that “We are not makers of history. We are made by history.” This history being unveiled of the political lives and works of Dr. Cheddi Jagan and Mr. Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham must be used to shape our lives and destinies so that we may pass on a rich legacy to our inheritors. The interwoven, and interdependent lives of these two men must be revisited; not individually and in isolation of each other, but rather together. Theirs’ was a symbiotic relationship on which the nation’s hopes and aspirations of a united and free Guyana rested. But alas, became imperilled on the rocks of misfortune, mistrust and mistakes. Is it too sim- plistic to ask whether the dream can be sewn together and restarted? I think not. In Burnham’s eloquent speeches much is revealed, and contextualised, about the man and his politics. His presentations cover a wide gamut of subjects and issues; many of which are still extant today. Forbes Burnham was fiercely independent of mind and patriotic of spirit, as could be clearly seen in his words expressed during the debate on the Federal Supreme Court (Appeals) Bill on the 15th April, 1958, or in his celebrated Motion on Fed- eration with the West Indies in August, when a marathon and epic debate ensued over many days on the benefits and potential pitfalls of political independence and federation. Burnham implored his colleagues of the day quite emphatically thus: “Do we want the doubtful reputation of being inde- pendent and unknown…Therefore if it is the ambition of British Guiana to enjoy independence similar to that of those places and to be unknown or perhaps to be independent and be the recipients of charity from Britain or elsewhere, let us say that and let us be prepared in this 20th century to be a parasitical nation.” Of course the West Indies Federation failed, but what remains a subject for argument and debate is whether Guyana became, and remains, a parasitic state given its heavy dependence on donor and institutional support and aid. Another sterling characteristic of Mr. Burnham’s was his willingness and sincerity to embrace worthwhile suggestions and proposals of the then Minister of Trade and Industry, the indefatigable Dr. Cheddi Jagan, his po- litical opponent. Many examples of this can be seen as when he stated dur- ing the debate on the West Indian Court of Appeal: “I am not in the habit of opposing for opposition sake. This one measure of the Government which commends itself to me, and for which I commend the Government”, or when during the debate on a Motion on the Delegation travelling to the United Kingdom to discuss constitutional reform, nationalism trumped partisan politics in these words: “There are some subjects which are above the pettiness of party differences, and there are some Motions which are so momentous, so far as our country is concerned, that to bandy words across the table is so sacrilegious. Such a debate, 4 such a Motion is the present one.” Again, on the occasion of a debate of a Motion on racial disturbances in the United Kingdom (September, 1958), Mr. Burnham began his contribu- tion by saying: “I beg to second the Motion moved by the Hon. Minister of Trade and Industry, and I desire to congratulate him on having moved it.” Magnani- mous gestures such as this have become all too rare in our present political construct, and my sanguine wish is that they do not disappear altogether. It is a great honour for me to be able to express my thoughts on the publication of the outstanding speeches of one of Guyana’s national he- roes, and it is my earnest desire that every reader, every student of history, and every practitioner of statecraft, will find knowledge and experience, immense feelings of joy, admiration, and patriotism as I have, as one word flows into another. Hon. Raphael G.C. Trotman, M.P. Speaker of the National Assembly of the 10th Parliament of Guyana 5 Biographical Summary Scholar : Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham was born to a Headmaster father and a devout Christian mother on February 20, 1923. His scholastic career is one of the outstanding features of his life. He went from Kitty Methodist School to Central High School and then to Queen’s College in 1935 and one year later gained the Centenary Exhibition as well as a Government Junior Schol- arship. In 1937, he won the Percival Exhibition Award and in 1942 he won the coveted Guyana scholarship. The war prevented him from proceeding to University overseas and he therefore read externally for a degree from London University. After the war, he proceeded to read Law at Gray’s Inn, winning the best speaker’s cup in the process. But the Law could not hold him. Politics was in his blood. Several Caribbean Leaders, especially Errol Barrow of Barbados have testified how Burnham and others “tired the sun with talking” on all subjects political. The destiny of Guyana and the Carib- bean region claimed his attention. Left wing politics attracted him and soon Burnham was involved with the youth arm of the Communist party of Britain and the politics of the Caribbean students. Brilliant Lawyer: In 1944, he was awarded the Bachelor of Arts Degree at the External Exami- nation of the University of London. In 1947 he gained with honours, the Bachelor of Laws Degree from the same University. In 1948, at the age of 25, he was admitted to the Bar of the Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn, London. In 1949 he returned home and was admitted to the local Bar. By 1959 he had so established himself as a brilliant lawyer, that he was elected President of the Guyana Bar Association. Politics: While a student in London, his keen interest in politics earned him the presi- dency of the West Indian Students’ Union in 1947 and participation as a delegate to the Students’ Congresses in Prague in 1947 and Paris in 1948.
Recommended publications
  • India Guyana Bilateral Relation
    India-Guyana Bilateral Relations During the colonial period, Guyana's economy was focused on plantation agriculture, which initially depended on slave labour. Guyana saw major slave rebellions in 1763 and again in 1823.Great Britain passed the Slavery Abolition Act in British Parliament that abolished slavery in most British colonies, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa. British Guiana became a Crown colony in 1928, and in 1953 it was granted home rule. In 1950, Mr. Cheddi Jagan, who was Indian-Guyanese, and Mr. Forbes Burnham, who was Afro-Guyanese, created the colony's first political party, the Progressive People's Party (PPP), which was dedicated to gaining the colony's independence. In the 1953 elections, Mr. Cheddi Jagan was elected chief minister. Mr. Cheddi Jagan of the PPP and Mr. Forbes Burnham of the PNC were to dominate Guyana politics for decades to come. In 1961, Britain granted the colony autonomy, and Mr. Cheddi Jagan became Prime Minister (1961–1964). In 1964, Burnham succeeded Jagan as Prime Minister, a position he retained after the country gained full independence on May 26, 1966. With independence, the country returned to its traditional name, Guyana. Mr. Burnham ruled Guyana until his death in 1985 (from 1980 to 1985, after a change in the constitution, he served as president). Mr. Desmond Hoyte of the PNC became president in 1985, but in 1992 the PPP reemerged, winning a majority in the general election. Mr. Cheddi Jagan became President, and succeeded in reviving the economy. After his death in 1997, his wife, Janet Jagan, was elected President.
    [Show full text]
  • A New World Tragedy $13.95
    ... - Joumey to Nowhere A NEW WORLD TRAGEDY $13.95 Rarely does a book come along which so transcends its apparent subject that the reader is ultimately given something larger, richer, and more revealing than he might initially have imagined. Already published in Eng­ land to overwhelming acclaim (see back of jacket), Shiva Naipaul’s Journey to Nowhere is such a book — a “power­ ful, lucid, and beautifully written book” (The Spectator) that is destined to be one of the most controversial works of 1981. In it, this major writer takes us far beyond the events and surface details surrounding the tragedy of Jones­ town and the People’s Temple —and gives us his remark­ able, unique perspective on the deadly drama of ideas, environments, and unholy alliances that shaped those events both in Guyana and, even more significantly, in America. Journey to Nowhere is, on one level, a “brilliantly edgy safari” (New Statesman) inside the Third World itself—a place of increasing importance in our lives—and on another, a book about America, about the corrupt and corrupting ideologies and chi-chi politics of the past twenty years that enabled the Reverend Jim Jones and the Temple to flourish and grow powerful in California and Guyana. Drawing on interviews —with former members of the Temple, various officials, and such people as Buckmin­ ster Fuller, Huey Newton, Clark Kerr, and others —on documents, and most importantly, on his own strong, clear reactions to what he observed, Naipaul examines the Guyana of Forbes Bumham, the CIA stooge turned Third World socialist leader, whose stated ideals of socialism, racial brotherhood, and cooperative agricul­ tural enterprise coincided so neatly, we learn for the first time, with those of the People’s Temple — ideals that led all too easily to violence and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on The
    Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the Application filed before the International Court of Justice by the Cooperative of Guyana on March 29th, 2018 ANNEX Table of Contents I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and process of decolonization of the British Guyana, 1961-1965 ................................................................... 3 II. London Conference, December 9th-10th, 1965………………………15 III. Geneva Conference, February 16th-17th, 1966………………………20 IV. Intervention of Minister Iribarren Borges on the Geneva Agreement at the National Congress, March 17th, 1966……………………………25 V. The recognition of Guyana by Venezuela, May 1966 ........................ 37 VI. Mixed Commission, 1966-1970 .......................................................... 41 VII. The Protocol of Port of Spain, 1970-1982 .......................................... 49 VIII. Reactivation of the Geneva Agreement: election of means of settlement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 1982-198371 IX. The choice of Good Offices, 1983-1989 ............................................. 83 X. The process of Good Offices, 1989-2014 ........................................... 87 XI. Work Plan Proposal: Process of good offices in the border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela, 2013 ............................................. 116 XII. Events leading to the communiqué of the UN Secretary-General of January 30th, 2018 (2014-2018) ....................................................... 118 2 I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and Process of decolonization
    [Show full text]
  • Three Ways of Understanding Government Classification of Jonestown Documents
    Three Ways to Understand Government Classification of Jonestown Documents Revision of paper given at Religion, Secrecy and Security: Religious Freedom and Privacy in a Global Context An Interdisciplinary Conference at Ohio State University April 2004 Rebecca Moore In 2001 my husband, Fielding McGehee III, and I filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice. McGehee and Moore v. U.S. Department of Justice seeks to compel the Justice Department to provide an index—as required by law—to three compact disks of materials the FBI had pulled together from documents collected in Jonestown, Guyana in 1978 and from files generated in the agency’s subsequent investigation into the assassination of U.S. Congressman Leo J. Ryan. Our interest in Jonestown is both personal and professional, and in that respect I am writing as a participant observer regarding the events of 18 November 1978. I am a participant to the extent that my two sisters and nephew died in Jonestown in the mass murders-suicides which occurred under the direction of Jim Jones and I wish to know how and why. My status as a relative makes me an insider of sorts, with access to survivors of the tragedy, and with stature with government agencies as an interested party. But I am an observer as well, given my training in religious studies and my desire to interpret the events to my academic peers within a scholarly framework. I also wish to write the history of Peoples Temple, the group begun by Jones in Indianapolis which migrated to California and then to Guyana, as accurately and completely as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korean Mass Games and Third Worldism in Guyana, 1980-1992 「鍛錬 された民のみぞ国づくりに役立つ」ガイアナにおける北朝鮮のマスゲー ムと第三世界主義 1980-1992
    Volume 13 | Issue 4 | Number 2 | Article ID 4258 | Jan 26, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus 'Only a disciplined people can build a nation': North Korean Mass Games and Third Worldism in Guyana, 1980-1992 「鍛錬 された民のみぞ国づくりに役立つ」ガイアナにおける北朝鮮のマスゲー ムと第三世界主義 1980-1992 Moe Taylor Abstract: As the 1970s drew to a close, Forbes appealing to a certain widespread longing Burnham (1923-85), Guyana's controversial within Guyanese culture for a more leader of 21 years, received Pyongyang's "disciplined" society. assistance in importing the North Korean tradition of Mass Games, establishing them as a major facet of the nation's cultural and political life during the 1980-92 period. The Introduction current study documents this episode in In the final months of 1979, while the Iran Guyanese history and seeks to explain why the hostage crisis and the Soviet invasion of Burnham regime prioritized such an Afghanistan dominated international headlines, experiment in a time of austerity and crisis, its the approximately 750,000 citizens of the South ideological foundations, and how Guyanese American republic of Guyana (formerly British interpreted and responded to Mass Games. Guiana) were informed by state-owned media I argue that the Burnham regime's enthusiasm about the coming arrival of a strange and for Mass Games can in large part be explained mysterious new thing called Mass Games, a by their adherence to a particular tradition of spectacle event that would be, according to one socialist thought which holds education and editorial, "the most magnificent in the history 1 culture as the foundation of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Hugh Desmond Hoyte Commemorative Lecture, 2011. Vision Or Pragmatism
    The 4th H D Hoyte Commemorative Lecture by Major General (retd) Joseph G Singh MSS, MSc, FRGS March 23, 2011 Topic- “Vision or Pragmatism: The Transformational Role of Hugh Desmond Hoyte, SC” Salutary Esteemed Chairman, Members of the Hoyte family, Ladies and Gentlemen, about two weeks before she passed away, President Hugh Desmond Hoyte’s widow, First Lady Joyce Hoyte requested through Ambassador Ronald Austin, that I deliver this 4th Hugh Desmond Hoyte Commemorative Lecture. The lecture should have been done on March 9, 2011 but because of her passing and funeral arrangements, it was re-scheduled to today. I am honoured to have been asked but regret that Mrs Hoyte is not present with us today although I have no doubt that she is here in spirit. That I should have been asked when there are so many other colleagues and friends of President Hoyte is very humbling and I wish to express my thanks to the relatives of President and Mrs Hoyte, to Ambassador Ronald Austin and to Bevon Currie and members of the Commemorative Committee for communicating with me the arrangements for today’s Lecture. Background Hugh Desmond Hoyte was born on 19 March 1929. He completed his secondary schooling and External Examinations leading up to the award of his Bachelor of Arts Degree. He was a High School Teacher in British Guiana and in Grenada. In 1959 he proceeded to the University of London where he completed his Bachelor of Laws and was called to the Bar of the Middle Temple. He returned to Guyana in1960 and joined the Law Firm of Clarke & Martin where he was associated with such luminaries as Eric Clarke, Babington Martin, LFS Burnham, Fred Wills and Fenton Ramsahoye.
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana. Jagan on Left, Burnham on the Right
    INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS FJM--17 Guyana Jagan on the Left, Burnham on the Right Georgetown Guyana November l, 1969 Mr, Richard H. NoSte Executive Director l:nstitute of Current World Affairs 535 Fifth Avenue New York, N.Y. lOO17 Dear Mr. Nolte: Guyana., in its fourth year of independence, is a racially tormented and politically divided country. Increasingly serious hostility between the East Indian and Afro-Guyanese popula- tions has made racism the dominant factor in domestic political developments-a racial polariza- tion which has also contributed to the breakdown of what could have been the most hopeful of the leftist nationalist movements in the Caribbean. In addition to its internal difficulties, Guyana also faces external pressures from its neigh- bors on both the east (Surinam) and the west (Venezuela). Border disputes have erupted at several points along Guyana' s frontier and last year one upheavsl resulted in an unsuccessful rebel- lion in one of the southern prov- inces called the Rupununi. The story is not a happy one. Cold war intrigue race riots, rebellion, rigged elections and repres- sion are the sal.ient points of the ordeal of Guyana--an ordeal, incidentally, exacerbated by Anglo-American foreign policy of the past twenty years. Guyana is a large country (83,000 square m+/-le.s) with a very small population (700,000). Situated on the northern coast of South America, Guyana is bounded on the east by Surinam, on the west,by Venezuela and in the south by Brazil. To the north is the Atlantic coastline extending about 270 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Rescinded Oliver R. Tambo Award to Guyana's Forbes Burnham Patricia Rodney the Walter Rodney Foundation
    Groundings Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 5 September 2014 Reflections on the Rescinded Oliver R. Tambo Award to Guyana's Forbes Burnham Patricia Rodney The Walter Rodney Foundation Asha T. Rodney The Walter Rodney Foundation Jesse Benjamin Kennesaw State University Aajay Murphy Kennesaw State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings Part of the African History Commons, African Studies Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Relations Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Political Theory Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Rodney, Patricia; Rodney, Asha T.; Benjamin, Jesse; and Murphy, Aajay (2014) "Reflections on the Rescinded Oliver R. Tambo Award to Guyana's Forbes Burnham," Groundings: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings/vol1/iss1/5 This Special Attention is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Groundings by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Groundings (2014) 1(1) : Page 10 SPECIAL ATTENTION Reflections on the Rescinded Oliver R. Tambo Award to Guyana’s Forbes Burnham Patricia Rodney Asha Rodney Jesse Benjamin Aajay Murphy BACKGROUND The Order of the Companion
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Chapter 2 Political Background Early History Before the arrival of Europeans, the land which is now Guyana was inhabited by semi- nomadic Amerindian (Carib and Arawak) tribes, who named it Guiana, which means “land of many waters”. The Dutch settled in Guyana in the late 16th century, but their control ended when the British became the de facto rulers in 1796. In 1815, the colonies of Essequibo, Demerara, and Berbice were officially ceded to Great Britain at the Congress of Vienna, and in 1831, were consolidated as British Guiana. Following slave revolts in the 18th century and the eventual abolition of slavery in 1834, thousands of indentured labourers were brought to Guyana, primarily from India but also from Portugal and China, to replace the slaves on the sugarcane plantations. The practice ceased in 1917. Many of the Afro-Guyanese former slaves moved to the towns and became the majority urban population, whereas the Indo-Guyanese remained predominantly rural. The Amerindian population remained living mostly in the country’s interior. In 1928 an appointed legislative council was established, with some extension of the franchise to elected members in 1943 and 1945. The Transition to Independence The first modern political party in Guyana was the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), established on 1 January 1950, with Forbes Burnham, a British-educated Afro-Guyanese, as chairman; Dr. Cheddi Jagan, a U.S.-educated Indo-Guyanese, as second vice chairman; and Dr. Jagan’s American-born wife, Janet Jagan, as secretary general. The PPP won the first fully popular elections permitted by the colonial government in 1953, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Desmond Hoyte, S.C. National Assembly Speeches: Volume 1
    HUGH DESMOND HOYTE, S.C. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEECHES VOLUME 1 March 1969 - November 1972 i Hugh Desmond Hoyte, S.C. National Assembly Speeches Volume 1 Compiled by Maurice B. Henry for the National Assembly, Parliament of Guyana, 2012. © The National Assembly of Guyana, 2014 Foreword © Hon. Raphael G.C. Trotman, M.P., 2014 Cover design by Peepal Tree Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without permission. ISBN 978-1-907493-75-1 ii PREFACE On the death of Mr. Linden Forbes Sampson Burnham, President, on 6th August, 1985, Mr. Hugh Desmond Hoyte, Prime Minister, acceded to the Office of President. Following the 9th December, 1985 General Elections he was declared President. As his Biographical Summary shows, he held several Ministerial Offices including Vice-President and Prime Minister prior to these dates. Following the General Election held on 5th October, 1992 Dr. Cheddi Jagan was declared President on the 9th October. Mr. Hoyte became Minority Leader and he held this office until his death on 22nd December, 2002. This collection of his Parliamentary Speeches over the years 1969 to 2001 is the first step taken in keeping with the Fourth Resolved Clause of Resolution No. 67 dated 7th August, 2008 of the National Assembly, which states – “Be It Further Resolved: That this National Assembly calls on the Government to designate a State Institution to be responsible for Historical Research and Documentation to chronicle and archive all of the works of each of the Presidents of
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Democratization in Guyana and Suriname: Critical Comparisons
    European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 84, April 2008 | 71-85 Re-democratization in Guyana and Suriname: Critical Comparisons Chaitram Singh Guyana and Suriname, two neighbouring countries on the northeast coast of South America, both re-assumed the path to democracy in the early 1990s. Guyana had from 1968 to 1992 experienced an authoritarian regime with the People’s National Congress (PNC), led by Forbes Burnham, maintaining power by rigged elections and the support of the security forces. In Suriname, the elected government of Prime Minister Henck Arron was overthrown by a military coup in 1980, only five years after independence. The military in this case chose not to govern by placing officers into the positions of president and prime minister but reserved for itself active veto powers over a predominantly civilian-staffed government until 1991. However, maintaining an authoritarian regime proved costly in both cases, and economic decline set in. The need for external aid rendered both regimes suscepti- ble to foreign pressure for a return to open party competition and free and fair elec- tions, already the subject of considerable and sustained domestic clamour in both cases. In the particular case of Suriname, an active insurgency by the country’s Maroons, while compounding the factors pushing Suriname down the economic slide and inviting international opprobrium over military excesses, convinced the military leaders that they did not have the political and social wherewithal to gov- ern effectively and that some accommodation with the established political parties was necessary. In both cases, too, the end of the Cold War and the stated goal of the United States to have a zone of democracy in this hemisphere had delegiti- mized military rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice President and Max V. Krebs, US Ambassador-Designate to Guyana
    Digitized from Box 65 of the Gerald R. Ford Vice Presidential Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 6e:NFlf)Et~TI:A L THE VICE PRESIDENT IS MEETING WITH AMBASSADOR MAX V. KREBS Thursday, June 27, 1974 5 :15 p. m. (15 minute s) Executive Office Building Office From: • V l&'.USSIfED 1.0. 12951. Sec. 3.5 I. PURPOSE r:~~:~GII~M=_~ To receive the Ambassador for a brief courtesy call. II. BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS, PRESS PLAN A. Background: Ambassador Krebs (biography at Tab A) requested the opportunity to pay a courtesy call on you while he is in Washington on consultation. He is a career Foreign Service officer who was appointed Ambassador to Guyana by the President early this year. Prior to that he was Deputy Chief of Mission in Buenos Aires, where he served as Charg~ dlAffaires after the departure of Ambassador John Davis Lodge. B. Participants: Ambassador Max V. Krebs and John O. Marsh. C. Press plan: To be announced. III. TALKING POINTS A. You may wish to note your pleasure in meeting the Ambassador and express your interest in hearing his impressions of Guyana and of the government of Prime Minister Forbes Burnham. B. Ambassador Krebs may note a potential problem in U. S. -Guyana relations if Guyana nationalizes the Reynolds subsidiary which mines bauxite there. Prime Minister Burnham, in following a program of expanding government control of resource -2­ exploitation, nationalized the Canadian-owned bauxite and alum.ina com.pany (a subsidiary of Alcan) in 1971. Com.pensation was provided.
    [Show full text]