Country Advice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Country Advice Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: CHN33444 Country: China Date: 4 July 2008 Keywords: China – Fujian Province – Fuqing City – Shouters – Detention procedures This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. What is the current situation (May 2008) regarding the arrest and detention of Shouters in China generally? 2. What is the current situation (May 2008) regarding the arrest and detention of Shouters in Fuqing city and/or Fujian province? 3. What is the usual detention period for arrests regarding illegal religious activity under the relevant Chinese regulations? 4. Is it 15 days detention? 5. Deleted. 6. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. What is the current situation (May 2008) regarding the arrest and detention of Shouters in China generally? There continues to be a paucity of current and specific information concerning the detention of members of the Local Church („Shouters‟) in China. The comments made in a July 2006 research response are representative: Recent information on the Shouters in China is scarce. The responses and reports below indicate that the group remains banned and operate underground although a limited number of Local Churche[s] have registered with local authorities. Sources also indicate that official repression continues (RRT Country Research 2006, Research Response CHN30336, 11 July – Attachment 1). Recent research responses which have attempted to obtain comprehensive, reliable and current information on the numbers, level of activity and treatment by state or local authorities of members of the local church or „Shouters‟ have been forced to rely on often very general accounts of unregistered religious groups. In part this limitation is intrinsic to the difficulty of reliably generalising about any unregistered religious activity in China, the organisational structure and meeting and worship practices of the Shouters more specifically, and in part a broader difficulty relating to the reliability of statistical estimates of religious belief, Christian or otherwise, within China. Thus, for example, in 2004 one source claimed that there were around 500,000 members of Shouter churches in China (“Christian bible „smuggler‟ released after 3 years in prison” 2002, Asia News, 3 September, http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=471 – Accessed 23 June 2008 – Attachment 2 whilst another referred to an unidentified source which put the figure at 800,000 (“Strong opinions surround Lee‟s Local Church” 2002, Orange County Register, 13 October [version inaccessible, but] published on Local Church Information Site http://www.lcinfo.org/?page=writings/media/ocregister1 – Accessed 1 July 2008 – Attachment 3). The latter source was the one used by Jason Kindopp in a detailed study of the Shouter movement submitted as part of a PhD program at George Washington University in 2004 (Jason Kindopp, “The Politics of Protestantism in Contemporary China: State Control, Civil Society, and Social Movement in a Single Party-State” – Attachment 4). The most recent reports from major international agencies in general do not give a high degree of prominence to discussion of Shouter members or leaders, and whilst Shouters are occasionally mentioned, such reference is sometimes made in connection with a range of other outlawed „evil cults‟ („xiejiao‟) as they are generally called. Extrapolation as to both official and unofficial attitudes towards Shouters from discussion of the broader range of Protestant house churches is also found in some reports; Since the banning of Falun Gong in 1999, the Chinese government has conducted a harsh campaign against „evil cults‟ and „heretic sects‟. This campaign against „evil cults‟ has, in recent years, expanded to include leaders of long-established Protestant groups. Over the past year, religious leaders have been imprisoned and followers detained and fined for „illegal cult activity‟… In February 2008, 21 house church leaders were sentenced to terms of one to three years of “re-education through labor” following a raid on a leadership training session in Shandong Province in December 2007, when police arrested 270 church leaders. The leaders were charged with being members of an „illegal cult‟ organization (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2008, USCIRF Annual Report 2008 – People’s Republic of China, 1 May – Attachment 5). Human Rights Watch in its annual report for 2007 noted that Reprisals against non-registered religious organizations have primarily focused on arrests of Protestants who attend “house churches,” for Bible study meetings and training sessions. The majority of those arrested are rapidly released, some after paying fines, but leaders of such underground churches are sometimes held on fabricated charges including “illegal business practices.” The freedom of belief of certain groups designated by the government as “evil cults,” including Falungong, continues to be severely restricted. (Human Rights Watch 2008, World Report 2008, 31 January – Attachment 6). The US Department of State observed During the period covered by this report, the Government‟s respect for religious freedom remained poor, especially for members of unregistered religious groups and groups the Government designated as “cults.” The Government tends to perceive unregulated religious gatherings or groups as a potential challenge to its authority, and it attempts to control and regulate religious groups to prevent the rise of sources of authority outside the control of the Government and the CCP. In some regions government supervision of religious activity was minimal, and registered and unregistered churches existed openly side-by-side and were treated similarly by the authorities. In other regions local officials supervised religion strictly, and authorities placed pressure on unregistered churches and their members. Local regulations, provincial work reports, and other government and party documents continued to exhort officials to enforce vigorously government policy regarding unregistered churches (US Department of State, International Religious Freedom Report for 2007 – China, September – Attachment 7). In his 2007 article which gives an overview of Christianity in China today, Joseph Tse-Hei Lee comments that in Guangdong Province, the church leaders have mediated between local authorities and Christians in the region. They take advantage of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement to support unregistered churches. In Shantou, the Three-Self Patriotic Movement church leaders even allow Seventh-Day Adventists to hold Sabbath and followers of Watchman Nee to meet in registered church premises. Elsewhere in the article he also refers to the existence of a four floor unregistered church building next to Xiamen University in Fujian Province, supporting reports referred to above concerning the variation in the level of tolerance of unregistered church activities across China generally (Joseph Tse-Hei Lee 2007, “Christianity in Contemporary China: An Update”, Journal of Church and State, Vol. 49, Spring, pp. 292, 301 – Attachment 8). According to Jason Kindopp, local authorities have also apparently registered Local Churches in some provinces; Local Churches now operate legally in Shanghai, Nanjing, Fuzhou, and a number of rural counties in Zhajiang and Fujian Provinces. The Local Church in Fujian‟s rural Longtian district, for example recently built a massive church complex with a 4,000 person seating capacity and adjoining classrooms for Sunday school. Registration has often occurred in the face of TSPM opposition, although lianghui officials have also found it expedient to forge a modus vivendi with Local Church leaders, particularly in areas where Local Church adherents constitute a sizable minority or even a majority of Protestants (Jason Kindopp, “The Politics of Protestantism in Contemporary China: State Control, Civil Society, and Social Movement in a Single Party-State” – Attachment 4). Other research responses which cover issues relating to the treatment of Shouters in China include: RRT Country Research 2005, Research Response CHN17561, 7 October which provides general information about „Shouters‟ (Attachment 9) RRT Country Research 2004, Research Response CHN16876, 11 August, includes general information and comments by two external experts in the area (Attachment 10). RRT Research & Information Services 2007, Research Response CHN32709, 20 December, includes a later update and comments on Fujian (Attachment 11). RRT Country Research 2006, Research Response CHN30365, 3 August includes DFAT advice (Attachment 12). In its most recent annual report covering the year 2007, the China Aid Association provides an overview of the general situation for Christian house churches within China. Whilst it cautions against assuming that the incidents it has received knowledge of represent all such cases, it does state that the report “covers a majority of provinces and municipalities in China and involves many types of persecution all of which are
Recommended publications
  • Country Advice China China – CHN37779 – Fujian Province –
    Country Advice China China – CHN37779 – Fujian Province – Lingtou Village – Gangtou – Christians – House churches – Internal relocation 2 December 2010 1. Please provide a map showing the location of Lingtou Village, Gangtou Town in Fuqing City. If practical, please locate the Gangtou Police Station on that map. An RRT research response dated 24 November 2009 provides information on churches in Gangtou Town.1 The research response includes the following map showing the locations of Lingtou and Gangtou in Fuqing.2 1 RRT Research & Information 2009, Research Response CHN35719, 24 November, (Questions 1 & 2) – Attachment 1 2 „Gangtouzhen, Fuqing, Fuzhou, Fujian, China‟ 2009, Google maps website http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=Gangtouzhen,+Fuqing,+Fuzhou,+Fujian,+China&ie=UTF8&cd=2&geo code=FfHZhQEd9jwfBw&split=0&sll=37.0625,- 95.677068&sspn=23.875,57.630033&hq=&hnear=Gangtouzhen,+Fuqing,+Fuzhou,+Fujian,+China&ll=25.5532 05,119.484215&spn=0.040421,0.066004&z=14&pw=2 - Accessed 23 November 2009 – Attachment 2 Page 1 of 7 A map showing the location of Gangtou police station was not located in a search of the sources consulted. An RRT research response dated 7 March 20083 refers to information provided to the Tribunals by the Senior Chinese Librarian for the Asian Collections at the National Library of Australia, which includes the addresses in Chinese of police stations in Fuqing City.4 A translation of the addresses by the Research & Information section includes reference to Gangtou Police Station in Gangtou Township, Fuqing at No. 125 in the list of police stations.5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian House Church Members by the Public
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 8 Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Home > Research Program > Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests (RIR) respond to focused Requests for Information that are submitted to the Research Directorate in the course of the refugee protection determination process. The database contains a seven- year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. Please note that some RIRs have attachments which are not electronically accessible. To obtain a PDF copy of an RIR attachment please email [email protected]. 10 October 2014 CHN104966.E China: Treatment of "ordinary" Christian house church members by the Public Security Bureau (PSB), including treatment of children of house church members (2009-2014) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. House Church Demography According to the Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index (BTI), which analyzes the quality of democracy and political management in 128 countries (Bertelsmann Stiftung n.d.), there are an estimated 80 million Christians in China, "many of whom congregate in illegal house churches" (ibid. 2014, 5). The Wall Street Journal reports that house church members could number between 30 and 60 million (29 July 2011). Voice of America (VOA) notes that the exact number of Christians is difficult to estimate because many worship at underground house churches (VOA 16 June 2014). For detailed information on the estimated number of registered and unregistered Christians in China, by denomination, as of 2012, see Response to Information Request CHN104189.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion in China BKGA 85 Religion Inchina and Bernhard Scheid Edited by Max Deeg Major Concepts and Minority Positions MAX DEEG, BERNHARD SCHEID (EDS.)
    Religions of foreign origin have shaped Chinese cultural history much stronger than generally assumed and continue to have impact on Chinese society in varying regional degrees. The essays collected in the present volume put a special emphasis on these “foreign” and less familiar aspects of Chinese religion. Apart from an introductory article on Daoism (the BKGA 85 BKGA Religion in China proto­typical autochthonous religion of China), the volume reflects China’s encounter with religions of the so-called Western Regions, starting from the adoption of Indian Buddhism to early settlements of religious minorities from the Near East (Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) and the early modern debates between Confucians and Christian missionaries. Contemporary Major Concepts and religious minorities, their specific social problems, and their regional diversities are discussed in the cases of Abrahamitic traditions in China. The volume therefore contributes to our understanding of most recent and Minority Positions potentially violent religio-political phenomena such as, for instance, Islamist movements in the People’s Republic of China. Religion in China Religion ∙ Max DEEG is Professor of Buddhist Studies at the University of Cardiff. His research interests include in particular Buddhist narratives and their roles for the construction of identity in premodern Buddhist communities. Bernhard SCHEID is a senior research fellow at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. His research focuses on the history of Japanese religions and the interaction of Buddhism with local religions, in particular with Japanese Shintō. Max Deeg, Bernhard Scheid (eds.) Deeg, Max Bernhard ISBN 978-3-7001-7759-3 Edited by Max Deeg and Bernhard Scheid Printed and bound in the EU SBph 862 MAX DEEG, BERNHARD SCHEID (EDS.) RELIGION IN CHINA: MAJOR CONCEPTS AND MINORITY POSITIONS ÖSTERREICHISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN PHILOSOPHISCH-HISTORISCHE KLASSE SITZUNGSBERICHTE, 862.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Regulatory and Policy Framework for Religion During The
    1 FREEDOM OF RELIGION Regulatory and Policy Framework for Religion During the Commission’s 2015 reporting year, the Chinese gov- ernment and Communist Party continued to restrict freedom of re- ligion in China. China’s Constitution guarantees ‘‘freedom of reli- gious belief’’ 1 but limits protection of religious activities to ‘‘normal religious activities.’’ 2 This narrow protection contravenes inter- national human rights standards. Article 18 of the Universal Dec- laration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Article 18 of the Inter- national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—the lat- ter of which China has signed 3 and stated its intent to ratify 4— recognize not only an individual’s right to adopt a religion or belief, but also the freedom to manifest one’s religion in ‘‘worship, observ- ance, practice and teaching.’’ 5 The Chinese government continued to recognize only five reli- gions: Buddhism, Catholicism, Islam, Protestantism, and Taoism. The 2005 Regulations on Religious Affairs (RRA) require groups wishing to practice these religions to register with the government and subject such groups to government controls.6 The government and Party control religious affairs mainly through the State Ad- ministration for Religious Affairs (SARA) and lower level religious affairs bureaus under the State Council,7 the Party Central Com- mittee United Front Work Department (UFWD),8 and the five ‘‘pa- triotic’’ religious associations—the Buddhist Association of China (BAC), the Catholic Patriotic Association of China (CPA), the Is- lamic
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-06-10 DCP Letter (English) W-Attachments
    June 10, 2014 Dear Brothers: Attached is a translation of an announcement that will be released in Chinese along with Congressman Joe Pitts' statement in the Congressional Record . Per the co-workers’ fellowship in Philadelphia, we are making this announcement available to the churches now and will formally release it to a major Chinese newspaper in North America, World Journal . The publication dates for the editions in various cities in the United States and Canada are listed below. Please announce this to the churches in your area and to the Chinese-speaking saints in particular. In addition, the statement will appear in the weekend edition of World Journal now scheduled for publication on June 22. On May 28, a highly publicized murder took place in China, and Chinese government agencies quickly linked the case to the Almighty God cult (AGC). At the same time, reports in official government news outlets identified Witness Lee as the head of "the Shouters," which they refer to as one of the top evil cults in China. The government also said that the AGC is an “offshoot" of the so-called Shouters. China's official Anti-Cult Association has now reported that Living Stream Ministry, Taiwan Gospel Book Room and the Hong Kong Bible Research and Education Centre are the centers of Witness Lee's cultic movement. This most recent government listing of cults also associates Watchman Nee with the start of "the Shouters." As far as we are aware, this is the first time this accusation has been made publicly. This Congressional Record announcement comes at a very crucial time.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago “The Spiritual Human Is
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO “THE SPIRITUAL HUMAN IS DISCERNED BY NO ONE”: AN INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY OF WATCHMAN NEE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY PAUL H B CHANG CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2017 For Laura 我妹子, 我親婦, 你奪了我的心 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1, Republican China 18 Chapter 2, Fuzhou: Church and Conflict 74 Chapter 3, The Spiritual Human 127 Chapter 4, The Nanjing Decade 169 Conclusion 223 Bibliography 250 Appendix 259 iii Introduction A network of congregations quietly rings the globe, comprised of Christians meeting in homes and unassuming buildings, which usually bear little resemblance to traditional “churches.” A few outward characteristics are obvious. The local gatherings are of varying sizes, from two or three to two or three thousand. Frequently the members share meals together, often before or after services which can be boisterous and participatory. Generally, no pastor, priest, or designated religious officiant presides. As the Spirit leads, different members stand to call hymns, declare verses from the Bible, give personal testimonies, or shout praises to God. But, for all their openness about their beliefs and their tireless attempts at outreach, it can be hard for outsiders to understand who these Christians are. Why do they not join existing Christian denominations? What is the basis for their identity and the institutions they create? When asked, congregants readily and happily acknowledge their fellowship and unity with other likeminded groups from around the world, but they may seem canny and evasive when asked for the name of their local church or the name of the church network as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 International Religious Freedom Report
    CHINA (INCLUDES TIBET, XINJIANG, HONG KONG, AND MACAU) 2020 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary Reports on Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet, and Xinjiang are appended at the end of this report. The constitution of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which cites the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), states that citizens “enjoy freedom of religious belief” but limits protections for religious practice to “normal religious activities” without defining “normal.” CCP members and members of the armed forces are required to be atheists and are forbidden from engaging in religious practices. National law prohibits organizations or individuals from interfering with the state educational system for minors younger than the age of 18, effectively barring them from participating in most religious activities or receiving religious education. Some provinces have additional laws on minors’ participation in religious activities. The government continued to assert control over religion and restrict the activities and personal freedom of religious adherents that it perceived as threatening state or CCP interests, according to religious groups, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and international media reports. The government recognizes five official religions: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism. Only religious groups belonging to one of the five state-sanctioned “patriotic religious associations” representing these religions are permitted to register with the government and officially permitted to hold worship services. There continued to be reports of deaths in custody and that the government tortured, physically abused, arrested, detained, sentenced to prison, subjected to forced indoctrination in CCP ideology, or harassed adherents of both registered and unregistered religious groups for activities related to their religious beliefs and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • “Cult” in the US and the PRC: Witness Lee and the Local
    What is in a Name? A Comparison of Being Branded a Religious “Cult” in the U.S. and the PRC: Witness Lee and the Local Churches By Teresa Zimmerman-Liu Ph.D. candidate Department of Sociology University of California, San Diego and Teresa Wright Chair and Professor Department of Political Science California State University, Long Beach Prepared for delivery at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association Seattle, WA, April 17-19, 2014 *Please do not cite or quote without the author’s permission 0 What is in a Name? A Comparison of Being Branded a Religious “Cult” in the U.S. and the PRC: Witness Lee and the Local Churches This paper focuses on the conflict surrounding a controversial religious group— known by its members as the “Local Churches,” but called by its critics the “Shouters”—that has been situated in and has moved between China and the United States. The paper examines how the categorization of the Local Churches has been shaped by the different social and political systems found in these two countries. It finds that in China, such categorization has occurred from the top- down, wherein the central government has played a key role in defining which religious groups are aberrant by placing them on a list of “evil religious cults.” In the United States, in contrast, religious group categorization has emanated from the bottom-up, as social groups and lobbyists have worked to shape public opinion, and to influence the way in which courts and legislative bodies regulate religions. In addition, this case study provides insight into the relationship between globalization and religious development, by delineating how a major world religion was contextualized to a local, foreign culture after the religion was introduced through globalization, and by examining the position of the indigenized form of the religion after it was translated back to a culture where the original form of the religion was dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Without Pluralism: Religious Landscape in Mainland China
    religions Article Diversity without Pluralism: Religious Landscape in Mainland China Yongjia Liang Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore, 11 Arts Link, #04-25, Singapore 117570, Singapore; [email protected] Received: 3 October 2017; Accepted: 9 January 2018; Published: 12 January 2018 Abstract: The paper explores religious diversity and pluralism in the religioscape of mainland China with three examples. While religious diversity is de facto practice, “religious pluralism” is not socially recognised, culturally legitimised, or discursively institutionalised. On the one hand, state co-option of religious groups is achieved through particular definition of “religion” without the conceptualisation of pluralism, leaving undefined religious activities to cultural policy or national security measures. On the other hand, practices that might be identified as religious elsewhere does not usually self-identified as such, not to say seek for the right of religious freedom. To explain the absence of articulated/institutionalised “religious pluralism” in China, the paper provides three examples—civil activism against tomb-levelling campaign, “the Society of Disciples” (mentuhui), and a ritual service provider. The paper argues that the religioscape of mainland China is one with de facto religious diversity without the ideology of religious pluralism, because the diverse religious practices do not make a conscious reference to pluralism, remain non-institutional, disinterested in religious freedom, and, most important of all, below
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Revival and Exit from Religion in Contemporary China
    China Perspectives 2009/4 | 2009 Religious Reconfigurations in the People’s Republic of China Religious Revival and Exit from Religion in Contemporary China Benoît Vermander Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/4917 DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.4917 ISSN : 1996-4617 Éditeur Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Édition imprimée Date de publication : 31 décembre 2009 ISSN : 2070-3449 Référence électronique Benoît Vermander, « Religious Revival and Exit from Religion in Contemporary China », China Perspectives [En ligne], 2009/4 | 2009, mis en ligne le 01 décembre 2012, consulté le 28 octobre 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/4917 ; DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.4917 © All rights reserved Special Feature s e v Religious Revival and Exit i a t c n i e from Religion in h p s c r Contemporary China e p BENOÎT VERMANDER This paper examines both the revival of religious organisations and practices in China and what could be coined the “exit from religion” exemplified by the loss of religious basis for social togetherness and the instrumentalisation of religious organisations and discourse. It argues that “revival” and “exit” taken as a twofold phenomenon facilitate an understanding of the evolving and often disputed nature of China’s religious sphere throughout history as well as the socio-political stage that the country is entering. he study of religion in the Chinese context confronts between civil society and the party-state whose policies and some basic problems: how relevant is the term “reli - instructions it transmits. (4) Further, the State Administration T gion,” borrowed from Western languages via Japan - of Religious Affairs (5) at the central, provincial, and local lev - ese, in referring to the social forms examined? (1) Even if one els functions as a sort of “ministry of religion” with extensive chooses to speak of a “religious sphere,” can Western con - powers.
    [Show full text]
  • China – Shouters – Fujian
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: CHN32709 Country: China Date: 20 December 2007 Keywords: CHN32709 – China – Shouters – Fujian This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Is there any information about the treatment of Protestant Christians in Jiaru Village, Sanshan Town, Fuqing City, Fujian? 2. In particular, how are “Shouters” regarded? RESPONSE 1. Is there any information about the treatment of Protestant Christians in Jiaru Village, Sanshan Town, Fuqing City, Fujian? 2. In particular, how are “Shouters” regarded? No information was found on the situation or treatment of Protestant Christians or “Shouters” (also referred to here as the Local Church), specific to the village of Jiaru or to the town of Sanshan in Fujian. For a map showing the location of Sanshan Town, see Attachment 1. According to the Nona.net website, Jiaru is 5.1 kilometers from Sanshan town (‘Map of Fuqing’, (undated) Research & Information database – Attachment 1; “Sanshan (Fujian, China) & Jiaru’ (undated), Nona.net website, http://nona.net/features/map/placedetail.1385061/Sanshan/ – Accessed 14 December 2007 – Attachment 2). Summary Information presented below focuses on reports on the treatment and situation of Shouters in Fujian province.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Our Christian Heritage 2
    _____________________________________________________________________________________ Faculty Guide Examining Our Christian Heritage 2 Clergy Development Church of the Nazarene Kansas City, Missouri 816-333-7000 ext. 2468; 800-306-7651 (USA) 2004 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Examining Our Christian Heritage 2 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright ©2004 Nazarene Publishing House, Kansas City, MO USA. Created by Church of the Nazarene Clergy Development, Kansas City, MO USA. All rights reserved. All scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. NASB: From the American Standard Bible (NASB), copyright the Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 973, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. NRSV: From the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of Churches of the Christ in the U.S.A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Notice to educational providers: This is a contract. By using these materials you accept all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement covers all Faculty Guides, Student Guides, and instructional resources included in this Module. Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Clergy Development grants to you a nonexclusive license to use these curricular materials provided that you agree to the following: 1. Use of the Modules. • You may distribute this Module in electronic form to students or other educational providers. • You may make and distribute electronic or paper copies to students for the purpose of instruction, as long as each copy contains this Agreement and the same copyright and other proprietary notices pertaining to the Module.
    [Show full text]