DOCSLIB.ORG

New Scientific Discovery Could Rewrite the Rules of Physics by Los Angeles Times

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Scientific Discovery Could Rewrite the Rules of Physics by Los Angeles Times 7th Grade ELA Article Analysis Week of August 29-Sept. 2 New scientific discovery could rewrite the rules of physics By Los Angeles Times A tiny, invisible force could change our basic understanding of the universe — if it really exists. Physicists at the University of California, Irvine, say they have found evidence for a fifth fundamental force of nature. They claim this new force is carried by a particle that until now has gone totally unnoticed. The team's scientific paper describes a boson, or subatomic particle, that may force scientists to rewrite the standard model of particle physics. The standard model is a theory that explains how the universe works. It describes the fundamental subatomic particles that make up all matter. It also explains the interactions of matter, or how matter responds to other matter. There are four known forces that govern, or control, how matter interacts. These forces are gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. Gravitation, or gravity, is the force that pulls matter together. It works over huge distances and sculpts the universe at the enormous scale of galaxies. The strong and weak nuclear forces guide the tiny connections between subatomic particles, while electromagnetism governs the relationship of electric currents and magnetic fields. Scientists have long believed that these four forces govern the bonds between all the matter in the universe. New Particle Could Affect Standard Physics Model The UC Irvine researchers say they have found a fifth force, which is transmitted by a particle they are calling “boson X.” The newly discovered force is a sort of mirror image of electromagnetism. Whereas electromagnetism acts on electrons and protons and ignores neutrons, this fifth force works between electrons and neutrons and ignores protons. Electrons and protons are subatomic particles that have equal but opposite electrical charges. Neutrons have no electrical charge. If the fifth force is real, "it needs to be studied in gory detail,” said physicist David McKeen, who was not involved in the study. In two published papers, the UC Irvine scientists have suggested how boson X can be added into the standard model of particle physics. Scientists are eager to see revisions in the standard model, which has long been viewed as unsatisfactory because it fails to describe everything in the universe. In fact, it can barely describe a tiny fraction of the universe. Questions Still Remain About Dark Matter For example, it cannot explain the existence of dark matter. This mysterious and invisible form of matter can only be detected through its gravitational effects. Dark matter does not interact at all with normal matter, yet it can sculpt galaxy clusters with its massive gravitational influence. The standard model also does not explain why dark energy, a force that counteracts the effects of gravity, is causing the universe to expand at an increasingly faster rate. Dark matter makes up nearly 27 percent of the universe’s mass. Dark energy makes up more than 68 percent of the universe's energy. By contrast, normal matter, which can be described pretty accurately by the standard model, makes up less than 5 percent of the universe. Physicist Timothy Tait, a co-author of the new study, said his team's discovery could help scientists create a model that more accurately describes the universe. It could also help answer some puzzling questions about dark matter. For example, scientists do not yet know the degree to which dark matter interacts with itself or what might make it interact. The new force-carrying boson could provide some answers. More Research Needed On Boson X Particle The force that boson X carries could turn out to be the "dark force” that makes dark matter interact with itself, Tait said. McKeen was more cautious, however. He stressed that much more work needs to be done before scientists can draw any major conclusions about whether the fifth force exists, and what role it has in explaining mysterious phenomena like dark matter. “It’s not obvious that it helps us with any of these other outstanding problems,” he said. “It could have a connection, but it’s not obvious to me. But I think it needs to be studied, and then people will understand whether there is or not.” .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spin and Parity of the Λ(1405) Baryon
    Spin and Parity of the (1405) Baryon here [1], precisely because of the difficulty in producing it, and in particular because it must be produced spin polarized for a measurement to be made. We used photoproduction data from the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab. The reaction + p K+ + (1405) was analyzed in the decay channel (1405) + + , where the decay distribution to + and the variation of the + polarization with respect to the (1405) polarization direction determined the spin and parity. The (1405) was produced in the c.m. energy range K 2.55 < W < 2.85 GeV and for 0.6 coscm.. 0.9 . The decay angular distribution of the (1405) in its rest Every subatomic particle has a set of properties that frame was found to be isotropic, which means the define its identity. Beyond mass, charge, and magnetic particle is consistent with spin J = ½. The first figure moment, each particle has discrete quantum numbers illustrates how the polarization P of a parent particle that include its spin angular momentum J and its with spin ½, in this case the (1405), transfers intrinsic parity P. The spin comes in integer steps of ԰ + starting from ½ for 3-quark objects (baryons). The polarization Q to the daughter baryon, in this case the , depending on whether the decay is in a spatial S wave parity is either positive (“+”) or negative (“”) (L=0) or P wave (L=1). This distinction is what depending on the inversion symmetry of its spatial wave determines the parity of the final state, and hence of the function. For example, the familiar proton and neutron parent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subatomic Particle Mass Spectrum
    The Subatomic Particle Mass Spectrum Robert L. Oldershaw 12 Emily Lane Amherst, MA 01002 USA [email protected] Key Words: Subatomic Particles; Particle Mass Spectrum; General Relativity; Kerr Metric; Discrete Self-Similarity; Discrete Scale Relativity 1 Abstract: Representative members of the subatomic particle mass spectrum in the 100 MeV to 7,000 MeV range are retrodicted to a first approximation using the Kerr solution of General Relativity. The particle masses appear to form a restricted set of quantized values of a Kerr- based angular momentum-mass relation: M = n1/2 M, where values of n are a set of discrete integers and M is a revised Planck mass. A fractal paradigm manifesting global discrete self- similarity is critical to a proper determination of M, which differs from the conventional Planck mass by a factor of roughly 1019. This exceedingly simple and generic mass equation retrodicts the masses of a representative set of 27 well-known particles with an average relative error of 1.6%. A more rigorous mass formula, which includes the total spin angular momentum rule of Quantum Mechanics, the canonical spin values of the particles, and the dimensionless rotational parameter of the Kerr angular momentum-mass relation, is able to retrodict the masses of the 8 dominant baryons in the 900 MeV to 1700 MeV range at the < 99.7% > level. 2 “There remains one especially unsatisfactory feature [of the Standard Model of particle physics]: the observed masses of the particles, m. There is no theory that adequately explains these numbers. We use the numbers in all our theories, but we do not understand them – what they are, or where they come from.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES Year 14 Physics Erin Hannigan
    FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES Year 14 Physics Erin Hannigan 1 Key Word List ■ Natural Philosophy – the science of matter and energy and their interactions. ■ Hadron – any elementary particle that interacts strongly with other particles. ■ Lepton – an elementary particle that participates in weak interactions. ■ Subatomic Particle – a body having finite mass and internal structure but negligible dimensions. ■ Quark – any of a number f subatomic particles carrying a fractional electric charge, postulated as building blocks of the hadrons. Quarks have not been directly observed but theoretical predictions based on their existence have been confirmed experimentally. ■ Atom – the smallest component of an element having the chemical properties of the element. 2 Fundamental Particles ■ Fundamental particles (also called elementary particles) are the smallest building blocks of the universe. The key characteristic of fundamental particles is that they have no internal structure. ■ There are two type of fundamental particles: – Particles that make up all matter, called fermions – Particles that carry force, called bosons ■ The four fundamental forces include: – Gravity – The weak force – Electromagnetism – The strong force 3 The Four Fundamental Forces ■ The four fundamental forces of nature govern everything that happens in the universe. ■ Gravity – The attraction between two objects that have mass or energy ■ The weak force – Responsible for particle decay – Physicists describe this interaction through the exchange of force-carrying particles called
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Subatomic- Particle Spectrometers∗
    IIT-CAPP-15/2 Introduction to Subatomic- Particle Spectrometers∗ Daniel M. Kaplan Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago, IL 60616 Charles E. Lane Drexel University Philadelphia, PA 19104 Kenneth S. Nelsony University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22901 Abstract An introductory review, suitable for the beginning student of high-energy physics or professionals from other fields who may desire familiarity with subatomic-particle detection techniques. Subatomic-particle fundamentals and the basics of particle in- teractions with matter are summarized, after which we review particle detectors. We conclude with three examples that illustrate the variety of subatomic-particle spectrom- eters and exemplify the combined use of several detection techniques to characterize interaction events more-or-less completely. arXiv:physics/9805026v3 [physics.ins-det] 17 Jul 2015 ∗To appear in the Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. yNow at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Overview of Subatomic Particles 5 2.1 Leptons, Hadrons, Gauge and Higgs Bosons . 5 2.2 Neutrinos . 6 2.3 Quarks . 8 3 Overview of Particle Detection 9 3.1 Position Measurement: Hodoscopes and Telescopes . 9 3.2 Momentum and Energy Measurement . 9 3.2.1 Magnetic Spectrometry . 9 3.2.2 Calorimeters . 10 3.3 Particle Identification . 10 3.3.1 Calorimetric Electron (and Photon) Identification . 10 3.3.2 Muon Identification . 11 3.3.3 Time of Flight and Ionization . 11 3.3.4 Cherenkov Detectors . 11 3.3.5 Transition-Radiation Detectors . 12 3.4 Neutrino Detection . 12 3.4.1 Reactor Neutrinos . 12 3.4.2 Detection of High Energy Neutrinos .
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghost Particle 1 Ask Students If They Can Think of Some Things They Cannot Directly See but They Know Exist
    Original broadcast: February 21, 2006 BEFORE WATCHING The Ghost Particle 1 Ask students if they can think of some things they cannot directly see but they know exist. Have them provide examples and reasoning for PROGRAM OVERVIEW how they know these things exist. NOVA explores the 70–year struggle so (Some examples and evidence of their existence include: [bacteria and virus- far to understand the most elusive of all es—illnesses], [energy—heat from the elementary particles, the neutrino. sun], [magnetism—effect on a com- pass], and [gravity—objects falling The program: towards Earth].) How do scientists • relates how the neutrino first came to be theorized by physicist observe and measure things that cannot be seen with the naked eye? Wolfgang Pauli in 1930. (They use instruments such as • notes the challenge of studying a particle with no electric charge. microscopes and telescopes, and • describes the first experiment that confirmed the existence of the they look at how unseen things neutrino in 1956. affect other objects.) • recounts how scientists came to believe that neutrinos—which are 2 Review the structure of an atom, produced during radioactive decay—would also be involved in including protons, neutrons, and nuclear fusion, a process suspected as the fuel source for the sun. electrons. Ask students what they know about subatomic particles, • tells how theoretician John Bahcall and chemist Ray Davis began i.e., any of the various units of mat- studying neutrinos to better understand how stars shine—Bahcall ter below the size of an atom. To created the first mathematical model predicting the sun’s solar help students better understand the neutrino production and Davis designed an experiment to measure size of some subatomic particles, solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fifth Force [Franklin 1993], Which Gives a Detailed Annotated History of the fifth Force Effort Along with Extensive References
    Eur. Phys. J. H DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2015-60044-5 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H Personal recollection The fifth force: A personal history Ephraim Fischbacha Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Received 12 September 2015 / Received in final form 14 September 2015 Published online 22 October 2015 c EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag 2015 Abstract. On January 6, 1986, a paper written by our group appeared in Physical Review Letters entitled “Reanalysis of the E¨otv¨os Exper- iment”. In that Letter we reanalyzed a well-known 1922 paper by E¨otv¨os, Pek´ar, and Fekete (EPF) which compared the accelerations of samples of different composition to the Earth. Our surprising con- clusion was that “Although the E¨otv¨os experiment has been universally interpreted as having given null results, we find in fact that this is not the case”. Two days later a front page story appeared in the New York Times under the headline “Hints of 5th Force in Universe Challenge Galileo’s Findings”, and so was born the concept of a “fifth force”. In this personal history I review the pre-history which motivated our pa- per, and discuss details of our reanalysis of the EPF paper that have not been presented previously. Our work led to illuminating correspondence with Robert Dicke and Richard Feynman which are presented here for the first time. I also discuss an interesting meeting with T.D. Lee, one of whose papers with C.N. Yang provided part of the theoretical mo- tivation for our work.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Energy
    Vacuum Energy Mark D. Roberts, 117 Queen’s Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8NS, Email:[email protected] http://cosmology.mth.uct.ac.za/ roberts ∼ February 1, 2008 Eprint: hep-th/0012062 Comments: A comprehensive review of Vacuum Energy, which is an extended version of a poster presented at L¨uderitz (2000). This is not a review of the cosmolog- ical constant per se, but rather vacuum energy in general, my approach to the cosmological constant is not standard. Lots of very small changes and several additions for the second and third versions: constructive feedback still welcome, but the next version will be sometime in coming due to my sporadiac internet access. First Version 153 pages, 368 references. Second Version 161 pages, 399 references. arXiv:hep-th/0012062v3 22 Jul 2001 Third Version 167 pages, 412 references. The 1999 PACS Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/pacslist 11.10.+x, 04.62.+v, 98.80.-k, 03.70.+k; The 2000 Mathematical Classification Scheme: http://www.ams.org/msc 81T20, 83E99, 81Q99, 83F05. 3 KEYPHRASES: Vacuum Energy, Inertial Mass, Principle of Equivalence. 1 Abstract There appears to be three, perhaps related, ways of approaching the nature of vacuum energy. The first is to say that it is just the lowest energy state of a given, usually quantum, system. The second is to equate vacuum energy with the Casimir energy. The third is to note that an energy difference from a complete vacuum might have some long range effect, typically this energy difference is interpreted as the cosmological constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Forces
    FIFTH FORCES Symmetry Tests in Nuclei and Atoms KITP, Santa Barbara Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine 19 September 2016 19 Sep 2016 Feng 1 FUNDAMENTAL FORCES • We know of four fundamental forces Gravity Electromagnetism Strong Weak • A fifth one would be a big deal • Forces can be mediated by a host of particles: pions, Higgs boson, dilaton, towers of KK gravitons,... • In this talk, “5th force” refers to a force mediated by a new spin-1 gauge boson 19 Sep 2016 Feng 2 5TH FORCE MOTIVATION: UNIFICATION • Quantum numbers: e.g., SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) à SO(10) • Unification of couplings: at a perturbative value and at a scale below Mplanck but high enough to satisfy proton decay • Any GUT group SO(10) or bigger has rank > 4, implies 5th force: U(1)B-L , Z’ gauge bosons, etc. 19 Sep 2016 Feng 3 5TH FORCE MOTIVATION: DARK MATTER • All evidence for dark matter is gravitational. Perhaps its in a hidden sector, composed of particles with no SM gauge interactions (electromagnetic, weak, strong) Hidden SM X • This hidden sector may have a rich structure with matter and forces of its own Lee, Yang (1956); Kobsarev, Okun, Pomeranchuk (1966); Blinnikov, Khlopov (1982); Foot, Lew, Volkas (1991); Hodges (1993); Berezhiani, Dolgov, Mohapatra (1995); … 19 Sep 2016 Feng 4 DM PORTALS • Astrophysics is sensitive to DM-DM interactions, but particle and nuclear physics are determined by DM-SM interactions • There are many ways the hidden particles could couple to us. Use effective operators as an organizing principle: where the operators are grouped by their mass dimension, with [scalar] = 1, [fermion] = 3/2, [Fµν] = 2 • M is a (presumably) large “mediator mass,” so start with dimension 4 operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Gravivector and Graviscalar Fields in N = 2,8
    TTWOOlfiS LABORATORI NAZIONALI Dl FRASCATI SIS - Pubblicazioni LNF-96/026 (P) 30 Maggio 1996 la //" f"" ^ \p” o^Xp Effects of the Gravi vector and Graviscalar Fields in N = 2,8 Supergravity Stefano Bellucci INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, P.O. Box 13, 1-00044 Frascati, Roma (Italy) and Valerio Faraoni Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, B.C. V8W 3P6 (Canada) Abstract The available tests of the equivalence principle constrain the mass of the Higgs- like boson appearing in extended supergravity theories. We determine the con ­ straints imposed by high precision experiments on the antigravity fields (gravivec- tor and graviscalar) arising from N = 2,8 supergravity. iimoN OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED PACS: 04.65+e, 04.80.Cc FOREIGN SALE! PROHIBITED Accepted for publication in Physics Letters B DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document — 2 — The discovery that N > 1 supergravity theories lead to antigravity is due to the work of the late J. Scherk [1, 2]. In a recent paper we have revived the interest for the implications of extended supergravity theories for antigravity [3]. This interest is connected to the high precision experiment at LEAR (CERN) measuring the difference in the gravitational acceleration of the proton and the antiproton [4]. For a review of earlier ideas about antigravity the reader is referred to the extensive article by Nieto and Goldman (5] and the references therein. The supergravity multiplet in the N = 2,8 cases contains, in addition to the graviton (J = 2), a vector field Aj, (J — 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Physics Study Finds New Data for Extra Z-Bosons and Potential Fifth Force of Nature 28 April 2009
    Particle physics study finds new data for extra Z-bosons and potential fifth force of nature 28 April 2009 The Large Hadron Collider is an enormous particle The original work by Wieman used a table-top accelerator whose 17-mile tunnel straddles the apparatus at the University of Colorado in Boulder, borders of France and Switzerland. A group of Colo. The Boulder team monitored a "twinge" of physicists at the University of Nevada, Reno has weak force in atoms, which are otherwise governed analyzed data from the accelerator that could by the electromagnetic force. The Standard Model ultimately prove or disprove the possibility of a fifth of elementary particles, developed in the early force of nature. 1970s, holds that heavy particles, called Z-bosons, carry this weak force. In contrast to the As the largest science instrument ever built, the electromagnetic force, the weak force violates LHC has the science community buzzing with mirror symmetry: an atom and its mirror image excitement as it may help in understanding the behave differently. This is known to physicists as inner workings of Nature. "parity violation." Remarkably, some of the new physics that may be The Boulder group's experiment opened the door to studied at this $6 billion facility can be probed new inquiry, according to Derevianko. using low-cost experiments fitting in a typical laboratory room. "It pointed out a discrepancy, and hinted at a possibility for new physics, in particular, extra Z- In a forthcoming Physical Review Letter article, the bosons," he said. University of Nevada, Reno physicists are reporting an analysis of an experiment on violation Interpretation of the Boulder experiment requires of mirror symmetry in atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Make an Atom Vocabulary Grade Levels
    MAKE AN ATOM Fundamental to physical science is a basic understanding of the atom. Atoms are comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are at the center of the atom while electrons live in lobe-shaped clouds outside the nucleus. The number of electrons usually matches the number of protons, yielding a net neutral charge for the atom. Sometimes an atom has less neutrons or more neutrons than protons. This is called an isotope. If an atom has different numbers of electrons than protons, then it is an ion. If an atom has different numbers of protons, it is a different element all together. Scientists at Idaho National Laboratory study, create, and use radioactive isotopes like Uranium 234. The 234 means this isotope has an atomic mass of 234 Atomic Mass Units (AMU). GRADE LEVELS: 3-8 VOCABULARY Atom – The basic unit of a chemical element. Proton – A stable subatomic particle occurring in all atomic nuclei, with a positive electric charge equal in magnitude to that of an electron, but of opposite sign. Neutron – A subatomic particle of about the same mass as a proton but without an electric charge, present in all atomic nuclei except those of ordinary hydrogen. Electron – A stable subatomic particle with a charge of negative electricity, found in all atoms and acting as the primary carrier of electricity in solids. Orbital – Each of the actual or potential patterns of electron density that may be formed on an atom or molecule by one or more electrons. Ion – An atom or molecule with a net electric charge due to the loss or gain of one or more electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible Probe of the New Fifth Force
    A possible probe of the new fifth force Gao-Chan Yong Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China The proposed protophobic fifth force in Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 071803 (2016) recently attracts much attention. To confirm or refute the existence of this new interaction, here I propose a method to probe the protophobic fifth force in dense matter that formed in nucleus-nucleus collisions. As expected, the protophobic fifth force has negligible effects on the usual observables in nucleus- nucleus collisions. While the protophobic fifth force evidently affects the value of final positively and negatively charged pions ratio at very high kinetic energies. The signal thus could be used to probe the protophobic fifth force in dense matter by nucleus-nucleus collisions’ experiments at current experimental equipments worldwide. I. INTRODUCTION force works between electrons and neutrons and ignores protons. It is known to all that there are four fundamental The fifth force might help scientists achieve the Grand forces, i.e., gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and Unified Theory. The fifth force might also be an entry- weak nuclear forces. The electromagnetic force, a type way into understanding dark matter, mysterious particles of physical interaction that occurs between electrically making up the bulk of the mass of the universe that have charged particles, is the one responsible for practically yet to be observed. all the phenomena one encounters in daily life above the Nowadays the possible discovery of the unknown fifth nuclear scale, with the exception of gravity. The gravita- force of nature attracts much attention and causes much tion sculpts the universe at the enormous scale of galaxy debate [30].
    [Show full text]