DOCSLIB.ORG

He 162 Volksjager Units Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
He 162 Volksjager Units Free FREE HE 162 VOLKSJAGER UNITS PDF Robert Forsyth,Jim Laurier,Mark Postlethwaite | 96 pages | 22 Nov 2016 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472814579 | English | United Kingdom He VOLKSJÄGER UNITS. Skip to He 162 Volksjager Units. Our Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia has reopened. Get free timed entry passes. The Museum in DC will remain closed. This object is not on display at the He 162 Volksjager Units Air and Space Museum. It is either on loan or in storage. The Reich Air Ministry issued specifications for the program on September 10,challenging manufacturer's to design, build, and fly, as quickly as possible, an "emergency, lightweight fighter" powered by a single BMW engine. The specifications also spelled out these key requirements: the new design must be easily mass-produced with the least amount of strategic materials such as steel and aluminum, and flight performance must exceed that of piston-engined fighters. He 162 Volksjager Units Socialist ideology profoundly influenced another design criteria. The jet had to be so simple to operate that teenage Hitler Youth pilots could fly into combat after rudimentary training. The term is a codename for the wing structure, not the aircraft. Heinkel designed and built the first prototype of the He in record time. Just 74 days passed between the day Heinkel received the contract on September 23 and first flight on December 6. Numerous technical He 162 Volksjager Units design problems were apparent and the prototype crashed four days later. Pilots mastered He 162 Volksjager Units of the Spatz's nasty habits but the jet would always be a difficult, even dangerous, aircraft to fly, even for experienced pilots. Had the Luftwaffe fielded Hitler He 162 Volksjager Units squadrons flying the Hetakeoff and landing would have killed as many pilots as combat. One of the central concepts of the program thus proved illusory. Heinkel started production before completing the initial testing and modification phase. Because the aircraft was never certified ready for combat, He pilots had only very limited encounters with He 162 Volksjager Units aircraft. It was painted with the number "white 23" and its red-white-black nose bands were in reverse order from the usual paint scheme, which may indicate that the wing commander and high-scoring ace, Col. Herbert Ihlefeld, flew this particular aircraft. After transfer to Britain, the U. For unknown reasons, mechanics replaced the tail unit at Wright Field with the tail unit of aircraft Its flying days ended permanently when someone at Freeman Field neatly sawed through the outer wing panels sometime before September The wings were reattached with door hinges and the jet was shipped to air shows and military displays around the country. The U. Air Force transferred the aircraft to the Smithsonian Institution in but it remained in stored at Park Ridge, Illinois, until transfer to the Garber Facility in January For more information, visit the Smithsonian's Terms of Use page. IIIF provides researchers rich metadata and image viewing options for comparison of works across cultural heritage collections. Heinkel He - Wikipedia It was designed and built quickly and made primarily of wood as metals were in very short supply and prioritised for other aircraft. Other names given to the plane include Salamanderwhich was the codename of its construction program, and Spatz "Sparrow"which was the name given to the plane by Heinkel. Through the U. Having lost too many fighters to the bombers' defensive guns, the Germans invested in a series of heavy weapons that allowed them to attack from outside the American guns' effective range. Meanwhile, the single-engine aircraft like specially equipped Fw As added armor to protect their pilots from Allied bombers' defensive fire, allowing them to approach to distances where their heavy weapons could be used with some chance of hitting the bombers. All of this added greatly to the weight being carried by both the single and twin-engine fighters, seriously affecting their performance. When the 8th Air Force re-opened its bombing campaign in early with the Big Week offensive, the bombers returned to the skies with the long-range P Mustang in escort. Unencumbered with the heavy weapons needed to down a bomber, the Mustangs and longer-ranged versions of other aircraft were able to fend off the Luftwaffe with relative ease. The Luftwaffe responded by changing tactics, forming in front of the bombers and making a single pass through the formations, giving the defense little time to react. The 8th Air Force responded with a change of its own, after Major General Jimmy Doolittle had ordered a change in fighter tactics earlier inamounting to an air supremacy entry into German airspace far ahead of the bombers' combat box formations — when at the end of April, He 162 Volksjager Units added additional directives allowing the fighters, following the bombers' flight back home to England, to roam freely over Germany and hit the Luftwaffe's defensive fighters wherever they could He 162 Volksjager Units found. This change in tactics resulted He 162 Volksjager Units a sudden increase in the rate of irreplaceable losses to the Luftwaffe day fighter force, as their heavily laden aircraft were "bounced" long before reaching the bombers. Within weeks, many of their aces were dead, along with hundreds of other pilots, and the He 162 Volksjager Units program could not replace their casualties quickly enough. The Luftwaffe put up little fight during the summer ofallowing the Allied landings in France to go almost unopposed from the air. With few planes coming up to fight, Allied fighters were let He 162 Volksjager Units on the German airbases, railways and truck traffic. Logistics soon became a serious problem for the Luftwaffe, as maintaining aircraft in fighting condition became almost impossible. Getting enough fuel was even more difficult because of a devastating campaign against German petroleum industry targets. Addressing this posed a considerable problem for the Luftwaffe. Two camps quickly developed, both demanding the immediate introduction of large numbers of jet fighter aircraft. One group, led by General Adolf Gallandthe Inspector of Fightersreasoned that superior numbers had to be countered with superior technology, and demanded that all possible effort be put into increasing the production of the Messerschmitt Me in its A-1a fighter version, even if that meant reducing production of other aircraft in He 162 Volksjager Units meantime. The second group pointed out that this would likely do little to address the problem; the Me had notoriously unreliable powerplants and landing gearand the existing logistics problems would mean there would merely be more of them on the ground waiting for parts that would never arrive, or for fuel that was not available. Instead, He 162 Volksjager Units suggested that a new design be built — one so inexpensive that if a machine was damaged or worn out, it could simply be discarded and replaced with a fresh plane straight off the assembly line. Thus was born the concept of the "throwaway fighter". After the war, Ernst Heinkel would say, "[The] unrealistic notion that this plane He 162 Volksjager Units be a 'people's fighter,' in which the Hitler Youth, after a short training regimen with clipped-wing two-seater gliders like the DFS Stummel-Habichtcould fly for the defense of Germany, displayed the unbalanced fanaticism of those days. The requirement was issued 10 Septemberwith basic designs to be returned within 10 days and to start large-scale production by 1 January However, Heinkel had already been working on a series of "paper projects" for light single-engine fighters over the last year under the designation P. The results of the competition were announced in Octoberonly three weeks after being announced, and to no one's surprise, the Heinkel entry was selected for production. In order to confuse Allied intelligence, the RLM chose to reuse the airframe designation formerly that of a Messerschmitt fast bomber rather than the other considered designation He 162 Volksjager Units Heinkel had designed a relatively small, 'sporty'-looking aircraft, with a sleek, streamlined fuselage. Overall, the look of the plane was extremely modernistic for its time, appearing quite contemporary in terms of layout and angular arrangement even to today's eyes. The BMW axial-flow turbojet was He 162 Volksjager Units in a pod nacelle uniquely situated atop the fuselage, [7] just aft of the He 162 Volksjager Units and centered directly over the wing's center section. The He airframe design featured an uncomplicated tricycle landing gearthe first such landing gear system to be present from the very start in any He 162 Volksjager Units Axis Powers single-engined fighter design, that retracted into the fuselage, performed simply with extension springs, mechanical locks, He 162 Volksjager Units and counterweights, and a minimum of any hydraulics employed in its design — a window in the lower forward cockpit area, He 162 Volksjager Units the rudder pedals, allowed for visual checking of the nosegear's retraction operation. The He V1 first prototype flew within an astoundingly short period of time: the design was chosen on 25 September and first flew on 6 December, [7] less than 90 days later. Other problems were noted as well, notably a pitch instability and problems with sideslip due to the rudder design. On a second flight on 10 December, again with Peter at the controls, in front of various Nazi officials, the glue again caused a structural failure. This allowed the aileron to separate from the wing, causing the plane to roll He 162 Volksjager Units and crash, killing Peter. An investigation into the failure revealed that the wing structure had to be strengthened and some redesign was needed, as the glue bonding required for the wood parts was in many cases defective.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 633 Squadron Battle of Britian
    P3 633 squadron Battle of Britain Dam Busters Music Cardboard wings (9 boys) Each boy comes in to hall in turn and a little about each plane is read out, then they all return together. During the second world war many young men where sent to fight in the skies over Britain and France in the RAF. It was due to their bravery skill and sacrifice that Germany never felt able to invade Britain. Here at Anchors we have been looking at some of the Aircraft which they flew, contrary to popular belief they weren’t all spitfires. Planes Fighters Miles M20 Emergency fighter, designed for quick production should the RAF have a shortage of fighters. The M-20 was an all-wood monoplane with fixed landing gear, using many parts of the Master trainer. It was designed and built in only 65 days and had good performance, but the R.A.F. did not need the M.20. Later the M.20 was considered as an expendable shipboard fighter. Farley Firefly Two-seat reconaissance fighter. It was a low-wing monoplane with a wide-track undercarriage, smaller than the Fulmar that preceded it, and provided with a more powerful engine. The design was deliberately conventional, to bring it into service quickly. Early Fireflies had a deep 'beard' radiator, later models had wing leading root intakes. The concept of the two-seat fighter may have been mistaken, but the Firefly was a versatile aircraft, taking part not only in WWII but also in the Korean war. The last of the 1702 built was delivered in 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Introduction: New Researchers and the Bright Future of Military History
    www.bjmh.org.uk British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Cover picture: Royal Navy destroyers visiting Derry, Northern Ireland, 11 June 1933. Photo © Imperial War Museum, HU 111339 www.bjmh.org.uk BRITISH JOURNAL FOR MILITARY HISTORY EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD The Editorial Team gratefully acknowledges the support of the British Journal for Military History’s Editorial Advisory Board the membership of which is as follows: Chair: Prof Alexander Watson (Goldsmiths, University of London, UK) Dr Laura Aguiar (Public Record Office of Northern Ireland / Nerve Centre, UK) Dr Andrew Ayton (Keele University, UK) Prof Tarak Barkawi (London School of Economics, UK) Prof Ian Beckett (University of Kent, UK) Dr Huw Bennett (University of Cardiff, UK) Prof Martyn Bennett (Nottingham Trent University, UK) Dr Matthew Bennett (University of Winchester, UK) Prof Brian Bond (King’s College London, UK) Dr Timothy Bowman (University of Kent, UK; Member BCMH, UK) Ian Brewer (Treasurer, BCMH, UK) Dr Ambrogio Caiani (University of Kent, UK) Prof Antoine Capet (University of Rouen, France) Dr Erica Charters (University of Oxford, UK) Sqn Ldr (Ret) Rana TS Chhina (United Service Institution of India, India) Dr Gemma Clark (University of Exeter, UK) Dr Marie Coleman (Queens University Belfast, UK) Prof Mark Connelly (University of Kent, UK) Seb Cox (Air Historical Branch, UK) Dr Selena Daly (Royal Holloway, University of London, UK) Dr Susan Edgington (Queen Mary University of London, UK) Prof Catharine Edwards (Birkbeck, University of London,
    [Show full text]
  • Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike
    (Image Source: Wired.co.uk) Able Archers Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike IAN EASTON September 2014 |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike September 2014 About the Project 2049 Institute The Project 2049 Institute seeks to guide decision makers toward a more secure Asia by the century’s Cover Image Source: Wired.co.uk mid-point. Located in Arlington, Virginia, the organization fills a gap in the public policy realm Above Image: Chung Shyang UAV at Taiwan’s 2007 National Day Parade through forward-looking, region-specific research on alternative security and policy solutions. Its Above Image Source: Wikimedia interdisciplin ary approach draws on rigorous analysis of socioeconomic, governance, military, environmental, technological and political trends, and input from key players in the region, with an eye toward educating the public and informing policy debate. ii |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment About the Author Ian Easton is a research fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, where he studies defense and security issues in Asia. During the summer of 2013 , he was a visiting fellow at the Japan Institute for International Affairs (JIIA) in Tokyo. Previously, he worked as a China analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA). He lived in Taipei from 2005 to 2010. During his time in Taiwan he worked as a translator for Island Technologies Inc. and the Foundation for Asia-Pacific Peace Studies. He also conducted research with the Asia Bureau Chief of Defense News.
    [Show full text]
  • The Looming Taiwan Fighter Gap
    This Page Intentionally Left Blank The Looming Taiwan Fighter Gap US-Taiwan Business Council October 1, 2012 This report was published in October 2012 by the US-Taiwan Business Council. The Council is a non-profit, member-based organization dedicated to developing the trade and business relationship between the United States and Taiwan. Members consist of public and private companies with business interests in Taiwan. This report serves as one way for the Council to offer analysis and information in support of our members’ business activities in the Taiwan market. The publication of this report is part of the overall activities and programs of the Council, as endorsed by its Board of Directors. However, the views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of individual members of the Board of Directors or Executive Committee. 2012 US-Taiwan Business Council The US-Taiwan Business Council has the sole and exclusive rights to the copyrighted material contained in this report. Use of any material contained in this report for any purpose that is not expressly authorized by the US-Taiwan Business Council, or duplicating any or part of the material for any purpose whatsoever, without the prior written consent of the US-Taiwan Business Council, is strictly prohibited and unlawful. 1700 North Moore Street, Suite 1703 Arlington, Virginia 22209 Phone: (703) 465-2930 Fax: (703) 465-2937 [email protected] www.us-taiwan.org Edited by Lotta Danielsson Printed in the United States The Looming Taiwan Fighter Gap TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Decisions and Policy Leading to the Royal Australian Air Force Having No Fighters Or Interceptors for the Coming War Against Japan
    The political decisions and policy leading to the Royal Australian Air Force having no fighters or interceptors for the coming war against Japan James Rorrison BA; Honours Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Creative Industries Faculty Queensland University of Technology 2015 KEY WORDS Australian aircraft industry; Australia’s Air Defence; Beaufort; Sir Winston Churchill; John Curtin; Billy Hughes; Interwar politics; Joseph Lyons; Sir Robert Menzies; Messerschmitt; Milestones in military aircraft; Mustang; Royal Air Force; Royal Australian Air Force; United States Army Air Corps; War against Japan; Warplanes; Weapons of World War I; Weapons of World War II; Wirraway; World War I; World War II; Zero. i ABSTRACT One of the most dangerous, illusional and deceptive of Australian pre-World War 11 beliefs was that the British represented a powerhouse of military protection against any foreign intimidation. In reality they impersonated a defence system without substance and an actual siphon of Australia’s military resources towards their own ends while offering only a potentially high-risk strategic alliance that helped bring Australia to the brink of disaster. As just one outcome on 18 January 1942, over two months after the Japanese air attack on the American naval base at Pearl Harbor, less than half a squadron of Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Wirraway lightly armed training planes alighted from an airstrip at Rabaul on New Britain ostensibly to intercept a Japanese naval air armada of over one hundred modern military aircraft, the outcome of which was a national tragedy. The Australian-made and manned Wirraways were shot from the sky or crash-landed with the loss of most of their crews.
    [Show full text]
  • RAF Variant Rules #1.45 Mar 2014
    RAF Variant Rules #1.45 Mar 2014 By Simon D Blackwell Introduction These rules are the final updated and expanded version of my earlier submissions #1.0-#1.4. They now incorporate the Miles Master M.24 Emergency fighter, as well as a tweak to the stats of the Fw.200. Also included are all the previous new aircraft types and the hypothetical ones of which all either were or could have been seen over the skies of Sussex, Kent and the Thames estuary in 1940. I was prompted to write these rules after playing the original game a few times and dimly remembering a turret armed British fighter that had no forward firing machine guns. The fighter in question was the Boulton Paul Defiant of which 2 Sqns served in the Battle of Britain. Left out of the game I suspect owing to its combat record which can only be described as disastrous I decided for historical accuracy more than attempting to change the balance of the game to introduce these much maligned aircraft to the game. After a few plays my appetite was whetted sufficiently to research introducing other aircraft not featured in the original game. As the reader will note from the sheer number of new aircraft types listed below, this became a much larger project than originally envisaged but proved far more interesting and enjoyable. I also decided to keep from the original variant rules just 1 elite RAF Sqn as there is an alternative unit to choose from that has the same stats as the withdrawn unit (263 Sqn Whirlwind).
    [Show full text]
  • He 162 Volksjager Units PDF Book
    HE 162 VOLKSJAGER UNITS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Robert Forsyth,Jim Laurier,Mark Postlethwaite | 96 pages | 22 Nov 2016 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472814579 | English | United Kingdom He 162 Volksjager Units PDF Book Training the necessary pilots was a separate challenge Good study of an emergency fighter, desined and built in 10 weeks! This object is not on display at the National Air and Space Museum. For more information, visit the Smithsonian's Terms of Use page. All of this added greatly to the weight being carried by both the single and twin-engine fighters, seriously affecting their performance. Worth a look! Download as PDF Printable version. Smith, J. The Luftwaffe put up little fight during the summer of , allowing the Allied landings in France to go almost unopposed from the air. Because the aircraft was never certified ready for combat, He pilots had only very limited encounters with Allied aircraft. Other names given to the plane include Salamander , which was the codename of its construction program, and Spatz "Sparrow" , which was the name given to the plane by Heinkel. Hitler's Luftwaffe. Within weeks, many of their aces were dead, along with hundreds of other pilots, and the training program could not replace their casualties quickly enough. Good read of a rarely documented aircraft and operating units. He has worked on the Osprey Aviation list since , and in that time he has produced some of the finest artwork seen in these volumes. A very interesting read. The Heinkel He Aircraft in Profile number Though still in training, I. Only two of the 13 aircraft were actually shot down.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020
    Issue No. 66 AUSTRALIAN MODEL NEWS OCTOBER 2020 Contents From the Editor 3. USS MIDWAY The Covid-19 virus has had a major effect on our model aircraft flying activities and just as we seemed to be getting 6. SCHNEIDER TROPHY RAMBLINGS over this problem another has been raised concerning the supply of balsawood. 9. HAYDN TRUDGEON’S NIEUPORT 27 AND PIETENPOL AIR CAMPER It seems that balsawood is used as a filler material in the construction of windfarm turbine blades, similar to the con- 10. TIM DEHAAN’S HAWKER HUNTER struction method used on the DH Mosquito in WWII. Driven by the Chinese manufacturers of wind turbine blades the 11. TIM DEHAAN’S FOKKER D.VIII demand for balsawood has increased and the price has risen sharply putting supply of our major aeromodelling material at 12. ADRIAN HELLWIG’S SE5A risk and the cost of model building significantly higher. 13. TIM DEHAAN’S CONVAIR 440 Hopefully design development and future availability of cheaper materials will reverse this situation before aeromod- 15. PORT MACQUARIE RC elling becomes too expensive to continue. MODEL AIRCRAFT CLUB 16. PORT MACQUARIE MINIATURE Thanks again to those who contributed to the content of the AERO CLUB newsletter. Please keep sending your articles and photos. 17. PETER GRAEBER’S SE5A John Lamont 20. MIKE MULHOLLAND’S WESTLAND LYSANDER 21. MIKE HAGE’S SCRUB CUBS 23. PETER GOFF’S CAC WIRRAWAY 28. PHIL CRANDON’S GRUMMAN FM-1 WILDCAT This newsletter is published bi-monthly to feature model aircraft building and flying and to report on aeromodelling events in Australia and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Aviation Cultures Program
    Aviation Cultures is an inclusive, online conference in which researchers and practitioners come together to share their knowledge and ideas of flight, AVIAT ION CU and its place in history and society. TA LTURE KING F S LIGHT KICK-O FF SOC & M IAL, MU Very few technologies have increased mobility over long-distances as EET-UP SIC TH URSDA Y 25 M much as aircraft have, but we are currently living in a world that is less 17:00 ARCH -19:00 connected by air than it has been for decades. Yet aviation has faced serious challenges before. a v i a t i o n c u l t u r e s . o r g # A v C u l t u r e s C o n f O V E R V I E W S C H E D U L E Notes: All times Melbourne time (UTC+11 / AEDT). CULTURES AVIATION UK attendees please note: the UK will change from GMT to BST on the night of NG FLIGHT 27/28 March. To convert visit: www.timeanddate.com TAKI USIC & SOCIAL, M KICK-OFF Aviation Cultures is an inclusive space, and we celebrate diversity among our MEET-UP ARCH members. We welcome members of all genders and sexual orientations and we SDAY 25 M THUR require tolerant and respectful behaviour on all our platforms. 19:00 17:00- Sessions link: www.crowdcast.io/e/acmkv FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 26 MARCH 27 MARCH 28 MARCH 9:00-10:00 9:00-10:00 Coffee Lounge Coffee Lounge 10:00-11:30 10:00-12:30 10:00-11:30 Early Career Networking SESSION 3 Blitz Papers Meet-up - Tips & Tricks Launching Places, Part 1 Part 1 to c.10:40 Keynote: Max Groot, Part 2 11:00-11:30 AirportHistory.org 11:30-13:00 12:00-13:00 CAHS Centenary Event Official conference opening Live Stream
    [Show full text]
  • Aircrew for the Duration WWII
    FOR THE DURATION WWII I I I EDITORS: Bruce Gaston DFC t Harry Horner DFC OAM, Raymond Storer his publication records many diverse incidents, exploits and history of a group of men who trained and served as aircrew in the RAAF T during World War TI. It was in mid 1940, when Britain had suffered military reverses in Europe that we begin. Each month, approximately a hundred physically fit, well educated young men, mostly aged 19-25 years, were accepted to train as aircrew in Western AustTalia. We follow the experiences, and lives in training, of some of the 417 who volunteered then to serve VIliththe RAAF officially - "For the Duration of the War and a period of twelve months thereafter" The trainees, about whom and by whom this book has been compiled, fotTned Courses 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Empire Air Training Scheme and entered Pearce Initial Training School in January, February, March and April 194L AIR CREW FOR THE DURATION WWII Editors: Bruce Gaston, DFC Harry Horner, DFC DAM Raymond Storer . OF AND BYMEMBERS OF RAAF EATS COURSES 10, II, 12 & 13. 1 Aircrew for the Duration WWII ISBN 1875317066 Design&Productionby WordsWorkExpress 156 Mills Street, Welshpool WA Ph: 350 5311 Fax: 350 5572 @1990 Bruce Gaston DFC, Harry Horner DFC OAM, Raymond Storer Limited edition. Copies obtainable from Raymond Storer 69 Smyth Road, Nedlands, 6009. Ph: 386 4712 2 DEDICATION To fellow air crew members of Empire Air Training Courses 10, 11, 12 and 13 who were killed while serving in the Royal Australian Air Force within the duration of WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Luftwaffe Tested to the Limit
    over Europe 1939 –1945 The Luftwaffe tested to the limit Dr. Manuel Wolf About the author Dr Manuel Wolf (born 1957) carried out intensive, investigative research worldwide for twelve years. The author was given access to private archives which would otherwise be denied. He interviewed numerous surviving pilots and contemporary witnesses. He analysed countless eye witness accounts and meticulously checked them against historical facts. Aerial warfare experts from all over Europe shared with him their knowledge and their enthusiasm for this theme, which he then captures in this book. Manuel Wolf has dedicated his book “Air War over Europe 1939-1945: The Lufwaffe tested to the limit” to his father Gottfried Wolf, who saw action as a young fighter pilot during the last days of the 2nd World War. About the book Never before has such a comprehensive, detailed and at the same time exceptionally grippingly written book about aerial warfare over Europe been available. The author himself is now publishing a thoroughly revised, new edition of his book. Dr. Manuel Wolf describes the aerial war which was fought over all of Europe’s major theatres of war and depicts the dramatic events from an entirely new perspective. With his flowing, lively, narrative style the author explains each sequence of events in a wholly innovative way, basing his chapters on themes and life histories as well as chronological events. The wealth of extraordinarily detailed information helps the reader to comprehend the overall military context, both on the ground and in the air. All the important types of aircraft are compared in a unique, never before published summary of the technical data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Ruth” Memories of Mobile
    “Mary Ruth” Memories of Mobile... We Still Remember Stories from the 91st Bomb Group Lowell L. Getz Foreword The Eighth Air Force flew a total of 264,618 individual bomber sorties out of England during World War II. The 91st Bomb Group (Heavy), alone, flew 340 missions. Although many missions were routine, with little action, all too many were anything but routine. Formations often were subjected to continuous German fighter attacks, especially during the early months of the war. Anti-aircraft batteries sent up clouds of flak over most targets. Losses of planes and lives were severe. Many of the returning planes were so badly damaged that they barely were able to struggle back to their bases in England. Causalities among the crews were heavy. Even the “milk runs” were far from uneventful. Assembling the complex formations in the murky skies over England and flying the long distances at subzero temperatures to and from the target in aging, war weary planes was wrought with danger. Each mission presented its own unique drama about which any number of stories could be told. Unfortunately, only a few accounts of the events transpiring on specific missions have been recorded. The trauma, the terror, the manner in which the airmen responded to the situations are disappearing with the participants. We owe these men such a debt of gratitude, however, that an attempt should be made to record as many of the incidents of the time as possible. It is only through such accounts that later generations will understand and appreciate the dedication and sacrifices of the men who flew in the Eighth Air Force.
    [Show full text]