Tilehurst Historic Environment Assessment Job No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PLANNING DESIGN ENVIRONMENT PLANNING Land at Tilehurst, West Berkshire Historic Environment Assessment September 2014 Historic Environment Assessment for land at Tilehurst, West Berkshire September 2014 Job No. 4544.04 Version 2.1 Prepared by: Helena Kelly TEP Harborough Innovation Centre, Airfield Business Park, Market Harborough, LE16 7WB Tel: 01858 414205 for Darcliffe Homes and Horstonbridge (Thames Valley) Ltd and Horstonbridge (Tilehurst) Ltd Written: Checked: Approved: HK NC HK Land at Tilehurst Historic Environment Assessment Job No. 4544.04 CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 2 2.0 POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 3 National Policy ......................................................................................................... 3 Local Policy ............................................................................................................. 4 Guidance ................................................................................................................. 5 Planning Practice Guidance ..................................................................................... 6 3.0 METHOD ................................................................................................................. 7 Data Gathering ........................................................................................................ 7 Site Survey .............................................................................................................. 7 Vantage Point Survey .............................................................................................. 7 Assessment of Significance ..................................................................................... 7 Assessment of effect ............................................................................................... 8 Limitations of the Assessment ................................................................................. 9 4.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................10 Archaeological and historic context .........................................................................10 Designated Heritage Assets ...................................................................................13 Non-designated heritage assets .............................................................................14 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF PREDICTED EFFECTS ...........................................................19 APPENDIX A: GAZETTEER OF KNOWN HERITAGE ASSETS ..........................................22 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................24 Figure 1 Location of known heritage assets Figure 2 Historic Landscape Characterisation Figure 3 Historic Landscape Sensitivity Figure 4 Historic Ordnance Survey Mapping 1 Land at Tilehurst Historic Environment Assessment Job No. 4544.04 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This historic environment assessment has been prepared on behalf of Darcliffe Homes and Horstonbridge (Thames Valley) Ltd and Horstonbridge (Tilehurst) Ltd. The land to which this report refers comprises four separate parcels, all within Tilehurst Parish, West Berkshire. The potential development sites are described in Table 1 below: Table 1 Land at Tilehurst, site specifications Site Name Area Grid reference Stonehams Farm 3.2 hectares SU655747 Land to the East of Sulham Hill 1.4 hectares SU658739 Land to the East of Sulham Hill between Barefoot 2.2 hectares SU656742 Copse and Cornwell Copse Land to the East of Long Lane and South of Blackthorn 1.3 hectares SU654744 Close 1.2 This historic environment report provides the specific baseline conditions and likely effect of development for each of the sites described above, with a description of the archaeological and historical context and background relevant to all four sites. 1.3 Therefore this assessment consists of: a description of the policy context and method of assessment (relevant to all sites); a description of the archaeological and historic background (relevant to all sites); a discussion of the potential within each site for as yet unknown heritage assets with archaeological interest (specific to each site); a description of the baseline historic environment conditions (specific to each site); a description of the significance of the designated heritage assets within a 1km buffer of the sites, and the contribution made by setting to the significance of these assets; a description of the likely predicted effects that development within the sites could have on the historic environment (specific to each site). 1.4 The assessment has been undertaken by a full member of the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA) and in accordance with the Standard and Guidance for archaeological desk-based assessment (IfA, 2008). 2 Land at Tilehurst Historic Environment Assessment Job No. 4544.04 2.0 POLICY CONTEXT National Policy 2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) includes as a core planning principle (paragraph 17) to “conserve heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that they can be enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of this and future generations”. Section 12 of the NPPF then goes on to describe provisions specifically relating to conserving and enhancing the historic environment. 2.2 Paragraph 128 of the NPPF directs that local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. 2.3 Paragraph 132 of the NPPF notes that the significance of a heritage asset can be harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of the heritage asset, or development within its setting. 2.4 Paragraph 133 of the NPPF describes how applications that would lead to substantial harm to or total loss of significance of a designated heritage asset should be refused unless it can be demonstrated that the harm is necessary to achieve substantial public benefit. Paragraph 134 of the NPPF directs that less than substantial harm should also be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. 2.5 The glossary to the NPPF describes a heritage asset as “A building monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest. Heritage asset includes designated heritage assets (a world heritage site, scheduled monument, listed building, protected wreck site, registered park and garden, registered battlefield, or conservation area) and assets identified by the local planning authority (including local listing)”. 2.6 Significance in relation to heritage policy as “The value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. That interest may be archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives not only from a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its setting”. 2.7 The setting of a heritage asset is defined as “the surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced. Its extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its surroundings evolve. Elements of a setting may make a positive or negative contribution to the significance of the asset, may affect the ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral”. 2.8 The National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) includes additional guidance on 3 Land at Tilehurst Historic Environment Assessment Job No. 4544.04 ‘Conserving and enhancing the historic environment’. Relevant to this assessment are the topics ‘Decision-taking: historic environment’ and ‘Non-designated heritage assets’ which provide additional guidance on identifying and assessing the effects of development on the significance of heritage assets. Local Policy 2.9 The Development Plan for West Berkshire sets out local planning policies and comprises a number of different documents. Relevant to this report are the Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2006-2026) adopted in July 2012 and the West Berkshire District Local Plan 1991-2006 (Saved Policies 2007). Policy CS 19 (West Berkshire Core Strategy): Historic Environment and Landscape Character In order to ensure that the diversity and local distinctiveness of the landscape character of the District is conserved and enhanced, the natural, cultural, and functional components of its character will be considered as a whole. In adopting this holistic approach, particular regard will be given to: a) The sensitivity of the area to change. b) Ensuring that new development is appropriate in terms of location, scale and design in the context of the existing settlement form, pattern and character. c) The conservation and, where appropriate, enhancement of heritage assets and their settings (including those designations identified in Box 1). d) Accessibility to and participation in the historic environment by the local community. Proposals for development should be informed by and respond to: a) The distinctive character areas and key characteristics identified in relevant landscape character assessments including Historic Landscape