DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Arkansas River Bacteria and Turbidity Tmdls

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Arkansas River Bacteria and Turbidity Tmdls FINAL 2014 BACTERIAL AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR OKLAHOMA STREAMS IN THE LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER AREA (OK220100, OK220200, OK220600) Oklahoma Waterbody Identification Numbers Poteau River OK220100010010_00 Poteau River OK220100010010_40 Brazil Creek OK220100030010_00 Bandy Creek OK220100040080_00 Sallisaw Creek OK220200030010_20 Sans Bois Creek OK220200040010_10 Sans Bois Creek OK220200040010_40 Little Lee Creek OK220200050040_00 Canadian River OK220600010119_10 Prepared by: OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MARCH 2014 2014 Bacterial and Turbidity TMDLs in the Lower Arkansas River Area Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... ES-1 ES - 1 Overview ................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES - 2 Problem Identification and Water Quality Target ................................................. ES-1 ES-2.1 Chapter 45: Definition of PBCR and Bacterial WQSs.............................. ES-2 ES-2.2 Chapter 46: Implementation of OWQS for PBCR ..................................... ES-4 ES-2.3 Chapter 45: Criteria for Turbidity .............................................................. ES-5 ES-2.4 Chapter 46: Implementation of OWQS for Fish and Wildlife Propagation ................................................................................................. ES-6 ES - 3 Pollutant Source Assessment ................................................................................ ES-7 ES - 4 Using Load Duration Curves to Develop TMDLs .................................................. ES-7 ES-4.1 Bacterial LDC ............................................................................................. ES-11 ES-4.2 TSS LDC ..................................................................................................... ES-11 ES-4.3 LDC Summary ........................................................................................... ES-11 ES - 5 TMDL Calculations ................................................................................................. ES-12 ES-5.1 Bacterial PRG ............................................................................................ ES-12 ES-5.2 TSS PRG .................................................................................................... ES-12 ES-5.3 MOS ............................................................................................................ ES-13 ES-5.4 PBCR Season ............................................................................................ ES-13 ES - 6 Reasonable Assurance ......................................................................................... ES-13 ES - 7 Public Participation................................................................................................ ES-14 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 TMDL Program Background ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Watershed Description ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 General ............................................................................................................ 1-4 1.2.2 Climate ............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.3 Land Use .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3 Stream Flow Conditions ............................................................................................. 1-9 SECTION 2 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND WATER QUALITY TARGET ................. 2-1 2.1 Oklahoma Water Quality Standards .......................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Problem Identification ................................................................................................ 2-6 2.2.1 Bacterial Data Summary .................................................................................. 2-6 2.2.2 Turbidity Data Summary .................................................................................. 2-7 2.3 Water Quality Target ................................................................................................. 2-10 SECTION 3 POLLUTANT SOURCE ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 3-1 3.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 NPDES-Permitted Facilities ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Continuous Point Source Dischargers ............................................................. 3-3 3.2.2 Stormwater Permits ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2.1 NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ........................................ 3-3 3.2.2.1.1 Phase I MS4 ................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.2.1.2 Phase II MS4 ................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.2.2 Construction Activities .................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.2.3 Multi-Sector General Permits ......................................................................... 3-4 3.2.2.4 Rock, Sand and Gravel Quarries ................................................................... 3-5 FINAL ii March 2014 2014 Bacterial and Turbidity TMDLs in the Lower Arkansas River Area Table of Contents 3.2.3 No-Discharge Facilities and Sanitary Sewer Overflows .................................. 3-5 3.2.4 Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations ....................................................... 3-6 3.2.4.1 CAFO ............................................................................................................. 3-6 3.2.4.2 PFO ............................................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.5 Section 404 permits ....................................................................................... 3-13 3.3 Nonpoint Sources ..................................................................................................... 3-15 3.3.1 Wildlife ............................................................................................................ 3-15 3.3.2 Non-Permitted Agricultural Activities and Domesticated Animals ................. 3-16 3.3.3 Failing Onsite Wastewater Disposal Systems and Illicit Discharges ............. 3-19 3.3.4 Domestic Pets ................................................................................................ 3-20 3.4 Summary of Sources of Impairment ....................................................................... 3-21 3.4.1 Bacteria .......................................................................................................... 3-21 3.4.2 Turbidity ......................................................................................................... 3-22 SECTION 4 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODS .................................................. 4-1 4.1 Determining a Surrogate Target for Turbidity .......................................................... 4-1 4.2 Using Load Duration Curves to Develop TMDLs ..................................................... 4-4 4.3 Development of Flow Duration Curves ..................................................................... 4-4 4.4 Estimating Existing Loading ...................................................................................... 4-6 4.4.1 Bacterial FDC ................................................................................................... 4-6 4.4.2 TSS FDC .......................................................................................................... 4-6 4.5 Development of TMDLs Using Load Duration Curves ............................................ 4-7 4.5.1 Step 1 - Generate LDCs .................................................................................. 4-7 4.5.1.1 Bacterial LDC ................................................................................................. 4-7 4.5.1.2 Turbidity LDC ................................................................................................. 4-8 4.5.2 Step 2 - Define MOS ........................................................................................ 4-8 4.5.3 Step 3 - Calculate WLA .................................................................................... 4-9 4.5.3.1 WLA for WWTF .............................................................................................. 4-9 4.5.3.1.1 WLA for Bacteria .......................................................................................... 4-9 4.5.3.1.2 WLA for TSS................................................................................................. 4-9 4.5.4 Step 4 - Calculate LA and WLA for MS4s ...................................................... 4-10 4.5.4.1 Bacterial WLA for MS4s ............................................................................... 4-10 4.5.4.2 Turbidity WLA for MS4s ............................................................................... 4-10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NWS Tulsa Storm Data Report for May 1999
    Time Path Path Number of Estimated May 1999 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm ARKANSAS, Northwest ARZ019-029 Crawford - Sebastian 01 0000CST 0 0 Flood 14 1900CST The Arkansas River at Van Buren started the month of May above its flood stage of 22 feet following a crest of 24.0 feet on April 28. The river remained above flood stage until 800 PM CDT on May 14. Benton County Siloam Spgs04 0200CST 0 0 Thunderstorm Wind (G52) Benton County Centerton04 0230CST 0 0 15K Thunderstorm Wind Small outbuildings were destroyed, trees were blown down, and pull-behind trailers were either damaged or moved. Washington County Prairie Grove04 0820CST 0 0 Thunderstorm Wind (G52) Carroll County Beaver04 0900CST 0 0 0.10K Thunderstorm Wind Several large tree limbs were blown down. Madison County Clifty04 0915CST 0 0 0.10K Thunderstorm Wind Several large tree limbs were blown down. Benton County Highfill04 1135CST 0 1 Lightning A man was injured when lightning struck a company trailer that he was unloading at the Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport. Crawford County 6 NW Natural Dam to04 1216CST 30175 0 3K Tornado (F3) 8 NNW Natural Dam 1220CST A significant long-track tornado first developed 4 miles west of Short, OK, moving northeast to about 7 miles southwest of Fayetteville, AR. This tornado reached its peak strength as an F3 tornado as it clipped extreme southeast Adair County, OK. This tornado then clipped extreme northwest Crawford County, passing through an unpopulated, forested area in the Ozark National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WISTER AREA FOURCHE MALINE: A CONTESTED LANDSCAPE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By SIMONE BACHMAI ROWE Norman, OKlahoma 2014 WISTER AREA FOURCHE MALINE: A CONTESTED LANDSCAPE A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Lesley RanKin-Hill, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Don Wyckoff, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Diane Warren ______________________________ Dr. Patrick Livingood ______________________________ Dr. Barbara SafiejKo-Mroczka © Copyright by SIMONE BACHMAI ROWE 2014 All Rights Reserved. This work is dedicated to those who came before, including my mother Nguyen Thi Lac, and my Granny (Mildred Rowe Cotter) and Bob (Robert Cotter). Acknowledgements I have loved being a graduate student. It’s not an exaggeration to say that these have been the happiest years of my life, and I am incredibly grateful to everyone who has been with me on this journey. Most importantly, I would like to thank the Caddo Nation and the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes for allowing me to work with the burials from the Akers site. A great big thank you to my committee members, Drs. Lesley Rankin-Hill, Don Wyckoff, Barbara Safjieko-Mrozcka, Patrick Livingood, and Diane Warren, who have all been incredibly supportive, helpful, and kind. Thank you also to the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, where most of this work was carried out. I am grateful to many of the professionals there, including Curator of Archaeology Dr. Marc Levine and Collections Manager Susie Armstrong-Fishman, as well as Curator Emeritus Don Wyckoff, and former Collection Managers Liz Leith and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Doing Business in Downtown Poteau
    Shop, Dine, Unwind: A guide to doing business in Downtown Poteau Historic Downtown POTEAU New Business Guide Contents • Poteau Fast Facts ................................2 • Doing Business Downtown ............2 • About the Old Town District ...........3 • Retail Environment ............................3 • Parking and Infastructure ................5 • Business Opportunites ....................5 • Recreation, Entertainment, and Fitness ....................................................6 • Revitalizing Downtown ...................7 • Restaurants ..........................................7 • Poteau Industry ..................................8 • Demographics and Community Report ....................................................9 • Education ...........................................10 • Government ......................................11 • Permitted Businesses .....................12 • Starting a Business in Poteau ......12 • Local Business Resources .............13 • National Business Resources .......13 • Publisher Information ....................14 About Poteau About this Guide Selected as one of “The 100 Best Small Towns in America” in Norman Crapton’s book by the same title, Poteau is one of the most unique towns in the region. During the early days, the area around Poteau was known as an Outlaw Haven. Ft. The purpose of this guide is to give Smith was the last stop for the law. Once one crossed the Arkansas border, they potential business owners a broad entered in to Indian Territory, where U.S. law no longer applied. During those early overview of the status of downtown. It days, the small wild west town of Poteau Switch was full of excitement. While should be used as a starting point for many moved here for economic advantage, others came to escape the law. businesses considering locating their business downtown. Over 100 years later, Poteau is still a vibrant and exciting city to live in. While it’s kept that small town feel, it has matured to offer much of what many large cities While this guide is intended to provide have.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    Destinations OklahomaTeacher's Guide Content for this educational program provided by: CIMC Students of All Ages: Your adventure is about to begin! Within these pages you will become a “Geo-Detective” exploring the six countries of Oklahoma. Yes, countries! Within Oklahoma you’ll be traveling to unique places or regions called “countries.” Maybe you’ve heard of “Green Country” with its forests and specialty crops, or “Red Carpet Country,” named for the red rocks and soil formed during the ancient Permian age. Each region or country you visit will have special interesting themes or features, plus fun and sometimes challenging activities that you will be able to do. You will notice each country or region can be identifi ed by natural, economic, historic, cultural, geographic and geological features. The three maps you see on this page are examples of maps you might need for future Geo-Explorations. As a Geo-Detective having fun with the following activities, you’ll experience being a geographer and a geologist at the same time! So for starters, visit these websites and enjoy your Geo-Adventure: http://education.usgs.gov http://www.ogs.ou.edu http://www.census.gov http://www.travelok.com/site/links.asp Gary Gress, Geographer Neil Suneson, Geologist Oklahoma Alliance for Geographic Education Oklahoma Geological Survey Teachers: PASS Standards met by Destinations Oklahoma are listed on pages 15 – 17. Indian Nations of Oklahoma 1889 - Before and after the Civil War, tribal boundaries were constantly changing due to U.S. government policies. Eventually the Eastern and Western tribes merged into a state called “Oklahoma,” meaning “(land of) red people.” Oklahoma's 10 Geographic Regions - These regions refl ect both physical features (topography) and soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Leflore County, Oklahoma
    Leflore County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Tyler Tapps, Ph.D., Kevin Fink, Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. The essential staff providing assistance for the development of the RMP included Rodger Cunningham, the manager of Lake Wister State Park who also has responsibility for Talimena State Park. In addition, Mandee Hafer provided assistance for numerous details related to Talimena State Park. Assistance was also provided by Hardy Watkins, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. Bryce Todd, southeast regional manager for Oklahoma State Parks, also assisted throughout the project. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University
    [Show full text]
  • 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
    2040: THE NEW FRONTIER 9/26/2016 Frontier MPO Metropolitan Transportation Plan FRONTIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 1109 S. 16TH STREET/P.O. BOX 2067 FORT SMITH, AR 72902 PHONE (479)785-2651 FAX (479)785-1964 WWW.FRONTIERMPO.ORG 2040: The New Frontier 2040: The New Frontier Non-Discrimination Clause Publication of this document was financed in part by funds provided by the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. The provision of Federal financial assistance should not be construed as denoting U.S. Governmental approval of plans, policies, programs or projects contained herein. The Frontier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statutes and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the Frontier MPO does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, or national origin, religion or disability, in the admission, access to and treatment in Frontier programs and activities, as well as the Frontier hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the Frontier MPO’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Dianne Morrison, Title VI & Title II Coordinator, 1109 S. 16th Street, Fort Smith, AR 72901 (479) 785-2651 or the following email address: [email protected] 2040: The New Frontier TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Plan Format Relationship with State and Federal Agencies II. Mission, Vision, Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………………………...5 III. Region………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 Geographic Arkansas Communities Oklahoma Communities IV. Demographics and Economy………………………………………………………………………20 Population Forecast Economic and Employment Income Employment V. Transportation Modes…………………………………………………………………………………………….32 Freight Demand Intermodal System Air Rail Water Roadway Pipeline Transit Bicycle Traffic Demand Crashes Truck VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis Ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 59 Article 20 2005 Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W. (2005) "Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae)," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 59 , Article 20. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol59/iss1/20 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 59 [2005], Art. 20 Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Notropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W. Robison Department ofBiologicalSciences, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754-9354 Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract The Kiamichi shiner, Notropis ortenburgeri, a diminuitive,silvery, upland stream fish in southwestern Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma was studied from 1999-2001 to determine its distribution, habitat, and conservation status in Arkansas and Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1969D-M483v.Pdf (2.442Mb)
    VASCULAR PLANTS OF SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA. FROM THE SANS BOIS TO THE KIAMICHI MOUNTAINS By FRANCIS HOBART MEANS 1 JRo Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1954 Master of Science Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 1959 Master of Education Mississippi State University Starkville, Mississippi 1962 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1969 Uf\LANUMA S[ATE UNIVERSITf L,IBRARY SEP 291989 \j. ~"!<,:,..~'\,, ....,.,~-~~-- ••••• ,:._... ·-·; ._.,. __ ....... ":.·.~-- ,.. , •. ..... ,.,.,,_ ...... .,.,.,,.. ,,~\~.Jt VASCUIAR PLANTS OF SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA. FROM THE SANS BOIS TO THE KIAMICHI MOUNTAINS Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College 7'24986 ii PREFACE The author grew up in the prairie region of Kay County where he ...... .-••>" learned to appreciate proper management of the soil and the native grass flora. After graduation from college, he moved to Eastern Oklahoma. State College where he took a position as Instructor in Botany and Agronomy. In the course of conducting Botany field trips and working with local residents on their plant problems, the author became increasingly interested in the flora of that area and of the State ,of Oklahoma.. This led to an extensive study of the northern portion of the Ouachita Highlands with collections currently num- bering approximately 4,200. The specimens have been processed according to standard herbarium procedures. The first set has been placed in the Herbarium of Oklahoma State University with the second set going to Eastern Oklahoma State College at Wilburton. Monographs, revisions and other taxonomic literature of the Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Smith J0urnal ® Official Sponsor
    FORT SMITH J0URNAL ® OFFICIAL SPONSOR VOL. IX, NO. 1 APRIL, 1965 EDITOR: Amelia Martin ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Sarah Fitzjarrald CONSULTING EDITOR: Carolyn Pollan GUEST WRITERS: OFFICIAL SPONSOR Anna E. Walker Hazel D. Pegues Maxine L. Chapman Helen W. Graham INDEXING: Floy Looper CONTENTS PROOF READERS: VOL IX, NO. 1 APRIL, 1985 Mary Lou Jacobsen Chloe Lamon Warren McCullough Letter from Editors 2 PHOTOGRAPHER: Heritage of Fort Smith Education 3 Dr. Art Martin Bill Donating Fort Smith Reservation OFFICE STAFF: to City for Public Schools 7 Del Conger Lee Conger John Carnall 9 Thelma Black General Oliver Otis Howard 10 Velma Barber Howard School 11 Jo Tillery Negro High Schools of Fort Smith 13 BOARD AND OFFICERS: Belle Point Elementary School 17 Col. C.B. "Pat" Porter, Pres. Carnall Elementary School 19 Del Conger, V.P. Mary Lou Jacobsen, Rec. Sec. Educators Are Guest Writers 21 Chris Allen, Cor. Sec. Floy Looper, Mbrshp. Sec. News & Opportunities 22 Donald Peer, Treas. Velma Barber In Loving Memory 24 Wayne Bledsoe Thelma Cousins Genealogy News and Letters from Readers 25 Gilmer Dixon Contents of Past Issues 27 Sarah Fitzjarrald Joel Stubblefield Marriage Book B, Fort Smith District, Jo Tillery Sebastian County, Arkansas 28 Phil White Felix Thomson 1884-1885 Newspapers 36 Membership in the Fort Smith Historical Society includes subscription to The Journal Index ., .51 of the Fort Smith Historical Society, which is published semi-annually. Year begins Jan. 1 COVER: Sesquicentennial Logo used by permission Arkansas and ends Dec. 31. Sesquicentennial Commission. Designed by Linda Ridener, For membership, send dues with your name Fort Smith resident.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf
    7.-A LIST OF FISHES AND MOLLUSKS COLLECTED IN ARKANSAS AND INDIAN TERRITORY IN 1894:. By SETH EUGENE MEEK, PH. D., Associate Professor oj Biolog)I and Geology in the Arkansas I1tdustrial University. INTRODUCTION. The following paper is based on two collections of fishes made by the writer under the auspices of the United States Fish Commission and the Museum of the Arkansas University. The first collection was made during the last week in May, 1894, along the line of the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad, between Fort Smith, Arkansas, and Arthur, Texas. The second collection was made during the last two weeks of August, 1894, in the St. Francis River in northeastern Arkansas. As these two regions are somewhat remote from each other, and unlike, for the most part, as to physical characteristics, they are treated separately in this paper. For assistance in the identincation of doubtful species and in the preparation of this report I am indebted to Prof. Barton W. Evermanu, ichthyologist of the United States Fish Oommission. WESTERN ARKANSAS AND EASTERN INDIAN TERRITORY. Tlie Poteau and Kiamiehi rivers are the most important streams draining the eastern portion of Indian Territory south of Fort Smith. These rivers rise in the Ozark Mountains, between the Arkansas and Red rivers, the Poteau flowing north, the Kiamichi south; each drains, for the most part, in the upper two-thirds of its course, a mountainous sandstone region, where their currents are swift and their bottoms usually rocky. Between Poteau, Indian Territory, and Fort Smith the Poteau River flows with a slow current in a deep and rather broad channel.
    [Show full text]
  • The River Gave and the River Hath Taken Away: How the Arkansas River Shaped the Course of Arkansas History
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2019 The River Gave and the River Hath Taken Away: How the Arkansas River Shaped the Course of Arkansas History Edward N. Andrus University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Citation Andrus, E. N. (2019). The River Gave and the River Hath Taken Away: How the Arkansas River Shaped the Course of Arkansas History. Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/ 3536 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The River Gave and the River Hath Taken Away: How the Arkansas River Shaped the Course of Arkansas History A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Edward N. Andrus University of Utah Bachelor of Arts in History, 2007 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in History, 2011 December 2019 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _______________________________ Jeannie Whayne, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _______________________________ Daniel Sutherland, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________ Elliott West, Ph.D. Committee Member Abstract The Arkansas River molded the history of Arkansas. It also shaped human to human interactions and human relationships with the physical environment. Since humans first encountered the river their lives have been influenced by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas-Oklahoma Arkansas River Compact Commission
    Arkansas-Oklahoma Arkansas NTRODUCTION River Compact Commission I Environmental Committee Report September 24, 2020 INTRODUCTION This document is a compilation of data that has been collected within the Arkansas/Oklahoma Arkansas River Compact area. Items included for review; NTRODUCTION I Introduction Water Quality Trends at Different Flow Regimes OWRB Beneficial Use Monitoring Program - Streams/Rivers OWRB Beneficial Use Monitoring Program – Lakes/Reservoirs Compact Waters included in the Oklahoma Water Quaity Integrated Report – 303(d) Water Quality Standards Revisions Relevant to the Arkansas-Oklahoma Compact Commission Area TMDL’s Completed in the Compact Area Oklahoma’s Phosphorus Loading Report for the Illinois River Basin Funding Provided by OWRB’s Financial Assistance Program Permits Issued for Water Rights in the Illinois River Watershed Oklahoma Conservation Commission Efforts in the Illinois River Watershed Table 1. Comparison of geometric means to the Oklahoma Scenic River total phosphorus criterion calculated from 1999-20191 and 2014-2019. 1999-2019 (3-month GM'S) 2014-2019 (3-month GM'S) Station (see footnotes) N N< % Exceeding N N< % Exceeding NTRODUCTION (Period) 0.037 0.037 (Period) 0.037 0.037 I Illinois River near Watts2 335 11 97% 63 5 92% Illinois River near Tahlequah2 336 23 93% 63 11 83% Flint Creek near Kansas2 327 0 100% 63 0 100% Barren Fork near Eldon2 327 193 41% 66 50 24% Little Lee Creek near Nicut1 110 108 2% 44 44 0% Lee Creek near Short 226 225 0% 47 47 0% Mountain Fork River near 197 167 15% 46 42 9%
    [Show full text]