DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuffiffiffiffi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuffiffiffiffi tuffiffiffiffi Date:2L.3.2020 To The Director - lA Division Ministry of Environment, Forest & Ctimate Change lndlra Paryawaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh Road New De[hi-110003 subject: Expansion of Motasses based Distitlery (60 KLPD to 180 KLpD) and co-generation power ptant (2.0 MW to g.0 MW) within the Existing Ptant Premlses at Vil.tage Jangrautiput, Tehsit pilibhit, District pitibhit (Uttar pradesh) by LH Sugar Factories Llmited - DLstiltery Division. Ref: MoEFCC FLte no. J-tL}tt/354/2013-tA lt(r) Dear Slr with reference to the aforesaid subject and above cited reference matter, we wou[d Like to apprise your good setf that we are herewith submitting the Final EIA EMP Report atong pubtic proceedings / with Hearing of Expansion of Molasses based Distittery (60 KLPD to 180 KLPD) and co-generation power plant (2.0 MW to g.0 MW) within the Existing P[ant Premises at ViLLage Jangrau[put, Tehsit Pitibhit, pitibhit pradesh) District (Uttar by LH Sugar Factories Limited - Distittery Division. We request your good ser.f to kindty consider our proposaLfor further proceedings. Thanking you and with regards, For L,H Sugar Factories Limited - Distil.Lery Dlvision. \N'n" RanjlnfMishra (DGM) Encl: As above L F{ Sr-rgar Fa*tq:n"i*s Ltcl. Distillery Division : Jangrauli Pul, P.O. Rooppur Kamaloo, Bisalpur Road, Near 7th Km. Stone From Pilibhit Assarn Chauraha Regd. Office & Sugar Factory: Civil Lines, Pilibhir,(U.P.) 262001 Phone: 05882 255867 / 256053, Fax: 05882 2555 I 8 Email: nrail @ ihsugar.com CIN No : U15422UP1033PLC000489. GSTIN No. O9AAACL4597LLZW + dm ,', * 1";'t .#fl8.# \ ' "2 I TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Thls to confirm that J M' EnviroNet Pvt Ltd. has been appointed by LH sugar Factorles Limited - Dlstittery Division to conduct EIA for Expansion of Motasses based Distittery (60 KLPD to 180 KLpD) and co-generatlon power ptant (2.0 MW to 8'0 MW) within the existing ptant premises at Vitlage Jangrautlpuf Tehsit pilibhit, pilibhit Dlstrict (Uttar pradesh). we further certify that we have revlewed the EIA report and take fuLt responsibility and ownership of the contents presented in the EIA report by J.M. EnviroNet pvt. Ltd. We also assure that there i.s no l.[tigation pending against the project and/orany direction / orderpassed by any Court of law against the project & Land in which the project is set up and that for any such litigation whatsoever, the sote responsibilitles witt be borne by company. Dale 21.3.2020 Ptace: Pilibhit, Up *""M." (DGM) L $-{ Sugiln F;a*tq:ries Ltel. Distillery Division : Jangrauli Pul, P.O. Rooppur Kamaloo, Bisalpr.rr Road, Near 7th Km. Stone From Pilibhit Assarrr Chauraha Regd. Office & Sugar Factory: Civil Lines, Pilibhit,(U.P.) 262001 Phone: 05882 255867 / 256053, Fax: 05882 2555 1 8 Email: mail @ ihsugar.com CIN No : U I 5 422UP 103 3 PLC0004 8 9. GS TIN No. 09AAACL4 597 LIZ,W + INDEX S. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO. A. TOR LETTER & TOR COMPLIANCE 1-23 1. TOR LETTER 1-8 2. TOR COMPLIANCE 9-21 B. FINAL EIA / EMP REPORT Chapter – I INTRODUCTION 22-25 Chapter – II PROJECT DESCRIPTION 26-53 Chapter – III DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 54-101 Chapter – IV ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 102-121 Chapter – V ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE) 122 Chapter – VI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME 123-125 Chapter – VII ADDITIONAL STUDIES 126-144 Chapter – VIII PROJECT BENEFITS 145-146 Chapter – IX ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 147 Chapter – X ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 148- 158 Chapter – XI SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 159-165 Chapter – XII DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ENGAGED 166 C. ANNEXURES 167- 296 1. EXISTING CGWA PERMISSION, FORWARDED LETTER FROM CGWB TO CGWA& 167-170 APPLICATION SUBMISSION RECEIPT FOR ADDITIONAL FRESH WATER REQUIREMENT 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE OF THE EXISTING UNIT (60 KLPD) 171-177 3. CERTIFIED COMPLIANCE REPORT BY RO, MOEFCC, LUCKNOW 178-190 4. INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR PARTIAL NON-COMPLIANCES OBSERVED BY RO, 191-209 MOEFCC, LUCKNOW 5. CONSENT TO OPERATE FOR AIR AND WATER 210-215 6. CTO COMPLIANCE STATUS 216 7. HOURLY METEOROLOGICAL DATA 217-253 8. DETAILED AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING TABLE 254-261 9. INVENTORY OF FLORA AND FAUNA 261-267 10. MOU WITH BRICK MANUFACTURERS FOR FLY ASH UTILIZATION 268-270 11. HEALTH RECORD FOR EXISTING EMPLOYEES 271-273 12. SAMPLE ANNUAL HEALTH REPORT & FITNESS CERTIFICATES 274-281 13. PUBLIC HEARING PROCEEDINGS WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION 282-296 i CONTENT LIST S.NO. PARTICULAR PAGE NO. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 22-25 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 22 1.2 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT AND PROJECT PROPONENT 22 1.2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT 22 1.2.2 INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT PROPONENT 24 1.3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE & SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS 24 IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY, REGION 1.3.1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE AND LOCATION OF PROJECT 24 1.3.2 IMPORTANCE TO THE COUNTRY AND REGION 24 1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY 25 CHAPTER II PROJECT DESCRIPTION 26-53 2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT 26 2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT 26 2.3 LOCATION MAP 26 2.3.1 GENERAL LOCATION MAP 26 2.3.2 SPECIFIC LOCATION MAP SHOWING CORNER CO-ORDINATES OF THE PLANT SITE 28 2.3.3 PLANT LAYOUT 29 2.3.4 PLANT SITE PHOTOGRAPHS WITH EXISTING GREENBELT 31 2.4 SIZE OR MAGNITUDE OF THE OPERATION 32 2.5 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT 33 2.5.1 RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT, SOURCE & TRANSPORTATION 33 2.5.2 FUEL REQUIREMENT 34 2.5.3 WATER REQUIREMENT 34 2.5.4 STEAM REQUIREMENT 40 2.5.5 BOILER DETAILS 40 2.5.6 POWER REQUIREMENT 40 2.5.7 DETAILS REGARDING D.G. SETS 40 2.5.8 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT 41 2.6 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION 42 2.7 MANUFACTURING PROCESS DESCRIPTION 43 2.7.1 DISTILLERY UNIT-PRODUCTION FROM MOLASSES 43 2.7.2 CO-GENERATION POWER PLANT(2.0 MW to 8.0 MW ) 46 2.7.3 EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT 47 2.8 LIST OF EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERIES 52 2.9 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES 52 2.10 ASSESSMENT OF NEW & UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY FOR THE RISK OF 53 TECHNOLOGICAL FAILURE CHAPTER III DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 54-101 3.1 INTRODUCTION 54 ii S.NO. PARTICULAR PAGE NO. 3.2 STUDY AREA, PERIOD, COMPONENTS AND METHODOLOGY 54 3.2.1 STUDY AREA 54 3.2.2 PERIOD OF BASELINE DATA COLLECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS 56 3.2.3 METHODOLOGY 56 3.3 ESTABLISHMENT OF BASELINE WITH BASE MAPS OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL 57 COMPONENTS 3.3.1 DETAILS OF LU/LC OF BUFFER ZONE 57 3.3.2 SEISMICITY AND FLOOD HAZARD ZONATION OF THE AREA 60 3.3.3 GEOLOGICAL AND HYDRO-GEOLOGICAL FEATURES 63 3.3.4 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL 63 3.4 METEOROLOGY 64 3.4.1 MIXING HEIGHT 64 3.5 AMBIENT AIR ENVIRONMENT 66 3.5.1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS 68 3.6 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 71 3.6.1 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MONITORING RESULTS 73 3.7 WATER ENVIRONMENT 73 3.7.1 SURFACE WATER 74 3.7.2 GROUND WATER QUALITY 76 3.8 SOIL ENVIRONMENT 80 3.8.1 INTERPRETATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS 84 3.9 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 84 3.9.1 INTRODUCTION 84 3.9.2 CROPPING PATTERN OF THE AREA 84 3.9.3 ECOLOGICAL SENSITIVE AREA 85 3.9.4 FLORA AND FAUNA 85 3.9.5 INTERPRETATION OF FLORA AND FAUNA 85 3.10 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 85 3.10.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE DISTRICT 85 3.10.2 STUDY AREA 86 3.10.3 COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF STATE, DISTRICT AND STUDY AREA 86 3.10.4 DESCIRPTION OF STUIDY AREA 86 3.10.5 BASELINE DATA & ANALYSIS OF SURVEYED VILLAGES 95 3.10.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS 98 3.10.7 INFERENCE OF THE STUDIED SURROUNDING AREA 101 3.10.8 RECOMMENDATION AND SUGGESTION 101 3.11 CONCLUSION 101 CHAPTER IV ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 102-121 4.1 INTRODUCTION 102 iii S.NO. PARTICULAR PAGE NO. 4.2 IMPACT DUE TO EXPANSION ACTIVITY 102 4.3 ANTICIPATED IMPACT DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE & PROPOSED MITIGATION 102 MEASURES 4.3.1 IMPACT ON TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE AND MITIGATION MEASURES 102 4.3.2 IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY & MITIGATION MEASURES 102 4.3.3 IMPACT ON NOISE ENVIRONMENT & MITIGATION MEASURES 103 4.3.4 IMPACT ON WATER QUALITY & MITIGATION MEASURES 103 4.3.5 IMPACT ON SOIL & MITIGATION MEASURES 104 4.3.6 IMPACT ON SOCIO- ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 104 4.4 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS DURING OPERATION PHASE & PROPOSED MITIGATION 104 MEASURES 4.4.1 IMPACT ON LANDUSE PATTERN 104 4.4.2 IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY AND MITIGATION MEASURES 104 4.4.3 IMPACT ON NOISE LEVEL AND MITIGATION MEASURES 117 4.4.4 IMPACT ON WATER QUALITY AND MITIGATION MEASURES 117 4.4.5 IMPACT ON SOIL AND MITIGATION MEASURES 118 4.4.6 IMPACT DUE TO SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION 119 4.4.7 IMPACT ON BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 119 4.4.8 IMPACT ON SOCIO ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 120 4.4.9 IMPACT ON OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND MITIGATION MEASURES 121 4.5 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 121 CHAPTER V ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY AND SITE) 122 5.1 GENERAL 122 5.2 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE SITE 122 5.3 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY 122 5.4 CONCLUSION 122 CHAPTER VI ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME 123-125 6.1 INTRODUCTION 123 6.2 MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES 123 6.2.1 INSTRUMENTS TO BE USED 123 6.3 MONITORING FREQUENCY 124 6.4 MONITORING/ SAMPLING LOCATIONS 124 6.5 DATA ANALYSIS 124 6.6 REPORTING SCHEDULES 125 6.7 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 125 6.8 DETAILED BUDGET 125 CHAPTER VII ADDITIONAL STUDIES 126-144 7.1 INTRODUCTION 126 7.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 126 7.2.1 PUBLIC HEARING PROCEEDINGS 126 iv S.NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Answered On:02.12.2002 Discovery of Ancient Site by Asi Chandra Vijay Singh
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TOURISM AND CULTURE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:2136 ANSWERED ON:02.12.2002 DISCOVERY OF ANCIENT SITE BY ASI CHANDRA VIJAY SINGH Will the Minister of TOURISM AND CULTURE be pleased to state: (a) names of the monuments in the Moradabad and Bareilly division under ASI; (b) whether Excavations conducted at Madarpur in Moradabad District of Uttar Pradesh have unearthed an archaeological site dating to 2nd century B.C.; (c) steps taken for preservation of the site and the amount allocated for the purpose; and (d) steps proposed to be taken to further explore to excavate the area? Answer MINISTER FOR TOURISM AND CULTURE (SHRI JAGMOHAN ) (a) A list of Centrally protected monuments in Moradabad and Bareilly division is annexed. (b) The excavation conducted in January, 2000 revealed findings datable to 2nd millennium B.C. (c) & (d) Steps have been taken to conserve the site. An amount of Rs.1,84,093/- has been incurred so far. Further steps have been initiated to explore adjacent areas to assess its archaeological potentiality. ANNEXURE ANNEXURE REFFERED TO IN REPLY OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO.2136 TO BE ANSWERED ON 2.12.2002 REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ANCIENT SITE BY ASI (a) Moradabad Division (i) Moradabad District: S.No. Locality Name of the Centrally Protected Monument/Site 1. Alipur, Tehsil :Chandausi Amarpati Khera 2. Alipur, Tehsil:Chandausi Chandesvara Khera 3. Berni, Tehsil;Chandausi Khera or Mound reputed to be the ruin or palace or Raja Vena 4. Bherabharatpur, Tehsil Amorha Large mound, the site of an ancient temple 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoires Infectés À La Date Du 14 Septembre 1961 Notifications Reçues Aux Termes Du Règlement Sanitaire International
    — 400 Territoires infectés à la date du 14 septembre 1961 — Infected areas as on 14 September 1961 Notifications reçues aux termes du Règlement sanitaire international Notifications received under the International Sanitary Regulations concernant les circonscriptions infectées ou les territoires où la pré­ relating to infected local areas and to areas in which to presence of sence de maladies quarantenaires a été signalée (voir page 364). quarantinable diseases was reported (see page 364). ■ = Circonscriptions ou territoires notifiés aux termes de l’article 3 ■ = Areas notified under Article 3 on the date indicated. à la date donnée. Autres territoires où la présence de maladies quarantenaires a été Other areas in which the presence of quarantinable diseases was notifiée aux termes des articles 4, 5 et 9 a: notified under Articles 4, 5 and 9 (a): A = pendant la période indiquée sous le nom de chaque maladie; A = during the period indicated under the heading of each disease; B = antérieurement à la période indiquée sous le nom de chaque B = prior to the period indicated under the heading of each maladie. disease. * = territoires nouvellement infectés. * = newly infected areas. PESTE — PLAGUE Andhra Pradesh, State Uttar Pradesh, State Amérique — America 27.VIII-14.IX Adilabad, District . * l.VTXI Aligarh, District .... ■ 13.VIIÏ.60 Chitloor, District .... B 5.VIII Allahabad, District . ■ 31.V BOLIVIE — BOLIVIA East Godavari, District . ■ 2tJ.XU.59 Azamgarh, District . ■ 7.VIII La Paz, Dep. Afrique — Africa Guntur, District . ■ 3I.XII.59 Banaras (Varanasi), Dist. ■ 14.VI.60 Murillo, Province Hyderabad, District. ■ U.IV Bareilly, District .... ■ 7.V1II Z o n g o ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Section-VIII : Laboratory Services
    Section‐VIII Laboratory Services 8. Laboratory Services 8.1 Haemoglobin Test ‐ State level As can be seen from the graph, hemoglobin test is being carried out at almost every FRU studied However, 10 percent medical colleges do not provide the basic Hb test. Division wise‐ As the graph shows, 96 percent of the FRUs on an average are offering this service, with as many as 13 divisions having 100 percent FRUs contacted providing basic Hb test. Hemoglobin test is not available at District Women Hospital (Mau), District Women Hospital (Budaun), CHC Partawal (Maharajganj), CHC Kasia (Kushinagar), CHC Ghatampur (Kanpur Nagar) and CHC Dewa (Barabanki). 132 8.2 CBC Test ‐ State level Complete Blood Count (CBC) test is being offered at very few FRUs. While none of the sub‐divisional hospitals are having this facility, only 25 percent of the BMCs, 42 percent of the CHCs and less than half of the DWHs contacted are offering this facility. Division wise‐ As per the graph above, only 46 percent of the 206 FRUs studied across the state are offering CBC (Complete Blood Count) test service. None of the FRUs in Jhansi division is having this service. While 29 percent of the health facilities in Moradabad division are offering this service, most others are only a shade better. Mirzapur (83%) followed by Gorakhpur (73%) are having maximum FRUs with this facility. CBC test is not available at Veerangna Jhalkaribai Mahila Hosp Lucknow (Lucknow), Sub Divisional Hospital Sikandrabad, Bullandshahar, M.K.R. HOSPITAL (Kanpur Nagar), LBS Combined Hosp (Varanasi),
    [Show full text]
  • CUG No. / Email ID of JAIL OFFICIALS of up Sl.N Name of Institution Designation Mobile N0
    CUG No. / Email ID OF JAIL OFFICIALS OF UP Sl.N Name Of Institution Designation Mobile N0. Other Email ID o. /Jail 1 Head Quarter,Lucknow Inspector General Of 9454418151 0522-2624454 [email protected] Prison 0522-2626524 FAX 2230252 2 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418152 0522-2626789 0522-2616245 3 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Depart.) 9454418153 4 Head Quarter,Lucknow DIG (H.Q.) 9454418154 0522-2620734 [email protected] 5 Head Quarter,Lucknow Senior Supdt.(H.Q.) 9454418155 0522-2622390 [email protected] 6 Head Quarter,Lucknow Finance Controller 9454418156 0522-2270279 7 Head Quarter,Lucknow Executive Engineer 9454418157 0522-2273618 8 Head Quarter,Lucknow Sodh Adhikari 9454418158 0522-2273238 [email protected] 9 Head Quarter,Lucknow Asst. Engineer 9454418159 10 Head Quarter,Lucknow Camp Office of 9454418160 Inspector General Of Prison 11 Sampurna Nand Jail Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418161 0522-2452646 Training Center, Deputy Director 9454418162 [email protected] Lucknow Office 9454418163 [email protected] 12 Range Office, Agra DIG Prison 9454418164 0562-2605494 [email protected] Office 9454418165 13 Range Office, Meerut DIG Prison 9454418166 0121-2760129 [email protected] Office 9454418167 14 Range Office, Bareilly DIG Prison 9454418168 0581-2413416 [email protected] Office 9454418169 [email protected] 15 Range Office, Lucknow DIG Prison 9454418170 0522-2455798 [email protected] Office 9454418171 16 Range Office, Allahabad DIG Prison 9454418172 0532-2697471 [email protected] Office 9454418173 17 Range Office, DIG Prison 9454418174 0551-2344601 [email protected] Gorakhpur Office 9454418175 18 Agra, Central Jail Senior Supdt.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Occurrence and Distribution of the Invasive Alien Angiospermic Plant Species in Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, Pilibhit, U.P., (India)
    Plant Archives Volume 20 No. 2, 2020 pp. 4782-4786 e-ISSN:2581-6063 (online), ISSN:0972-5210 STUDIES ON THE OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE INVASIVE ALIEN ANGIOSPERMIC PLANT SPECIES IN PILIBHIT TIGER RESERVE, PILIBHIT, U.P., (INDIA) Deepak Singh* and Alok Kumar Khare Department of Botany, Bareilly College, Bareilly (U.P.), India Abstract In a survey conducted in the year 2016-2018, for the record of invasive alien Angiospermic plant species of Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, a total 64 species belonging to 29 families were recorded, among these Dicotyledons represented by 57 species whereas monocots with 7 species. Among all Alien species, the maximum number of species (13) were from the family Asteraceae, followed by Amaranthaceae (05), Euphorbiaceae and Papilionaceae (04), Caesalpiniaceae (03), Convolvulaceae and Poaceae (03). The data revealed that herbs accounted for 45 species, undershrubs 6 species, shrubs 5 species, climbers 1 species, trees 2 species, grasses 3 species and sedges represented with 2 species. Key words: Invasive Alien Species, Pilibhit Tiger Reserve. Introduction ranges between a minimum of 5C (average) in winter India is the 7th largest country and one of the mega to maximum temperature of up to 40-44 C in peak diversity nations on globe out of 17 most biodiversity rich summer. The record of the average annual rainfall value countries. Varied climatic conditions coupled with a big is 612.59 mm. A survey of the literature reveals that except variety of habitats and environmental conditions make it a few old contributions viz., Duthie, (1922) and Kanjilal, more susceptible for the out break of invasive alien plant (1933), little work has been carried out on the taxonomy species.
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Lucknow, Part XIII-A, Series-22, Uttar Pradesh
    'qlff XIII .. 3i yr;-q/SE RJES .. 22 111" ~ct ;fq, " ~~SI~ 'f;taw;ft UTTAR PRADESH Part XIII -A VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORIY f\iT~T fim"T ~~~~ ~;lur'iT DIsrIru.C-r , ~a,!ff(tanT LUCK NOW DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK "{tit~i' ~r~ 1 ~n:ijTll' ~~Hrfi1<r. ~T t~~ifi I ::sr.;~T !ffi"'<IT~<l1 ~'6'( ~r~ j 1. !ffiITq;n 2. srT'Rilll'i 3. f~ ttiT 11~ 4. f~ ~ ~Cf~of aIT~ ix-xi 5 . f~ \ifil{J'IlfilT ~~ffQtpT <fiT q-n:'tI'(f ,dii-xlI.jii {i. f<r.l~O'fWT<fi' fccq-oft (~OO irJ 1-14 7. ~lT1lT -I "lIN fii~!ITCfi'T 16-198 ij~~T(1 : l-~f\if~ti'fi( (il ~«ffi OO~ (ii) lATi1T <fiT q1Jf~~11 ~T 16-19 (iii) ~Tll f~~f!!fOfiT 24-63 0) (j~«r~ ifrrrf'i:f(.f {ii) lJp:ff CfUTT~~if ~1 66-68 (iii) "lIT+r ffl~fl1TliT 72-103 3--q~~qfill (I) ~«1t?1' +rrrrf~ (ii) ~mT Cfft qO'fT~ ~r t06 -108 (iii) "«Ilf f~~fu'!i'T H2-13) qft~T I f!U'e1T, f'tffCfiCtIl arj'{ apl:f ~fqm8TT em ~'t1:1c:m: «T~ 138 -141 U ~Ffqllj';;T 'SfqT~ ~~ ;;rr,\ lfR tJil' rrfl"if, (ij(1'ij' cT~if) 7SfiftfUfiiT rrtTU t ~flf ~q ~CTT a:rt'fi'~ l42 ill q~~ EO} 'i§~ ~fcr!;TT ~CT lJ1lI'T etft \l:~'T 1. iff~~r~~ 143 2• ~(S{'fa:i 144 3. IT)~ii~mlfiif 145 -146 LV ~fiffi' GfrfQ'llr Q'q'T ar~~f'tRl' iifiimmlir 'li'T iiI',nT191TT 'fiT ~1:1 '5I'rrd~T a- ~q-fQ q-f,\ij't iii aqmt 'lTm 'fiT ~{t (at) ~f~~f 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Man-Animal Conflict to Be Listed As Disaster by up Govt
    Man-animal Conflict to be Listed as Disaster by UP Govt drishtiias.com/printpdf/man-animal-conflict-to-be-listed-as-disaster-by-up-govt The Uttar Pradesh government has given its in-principle approval to bring man-animal conflict under listed disasters in the State Disaster Response Fund to ensure better coordination and relief during such incidents. The move will enable faster relief, creating awareness, ensuring police support in areas when such conflicts are reported, and proper guidelines to handle situations when wild animals venture in human in-habitation. The recognition of man-animal conflict as disaster under SDRF is a paradigm shift in handling such situations which will ensure better synergy among agencies and quicker relief to affected people. The declaration of such conflict under SDRF will also mean that police and local administration will step in as soon as such a situation. Background “Living with the Wild: Mitigating Conflict between Humans and Big Cat Species in Uttar Pradesh” report by the UP Forest Department and Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) has analysed the patterns of attacks, and outlines the circumstances in which these shy animals injure or kill humans. It found that most attacks (90.6%) took place during the day, when the forest- dependent communities are most active. This suggests that tigers aren’t actively seeking out human beings as prey and “most human-tiger encounters are caused by humans accidentally disturbing tigers that are resting in fields or fringe forests areas during the day.” Since human beings are not a part of the tigers’ food chain, the attacks take place because the forest and fields are not separated by a buffer zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Pattern in Western Uttar Pradesh
    Volume : 4 | Issue : 12 | December 2015 ISSN - 2250-1991 Research Paper Geography Land Use Pattern in Western Uttar Pradesh Research Scholar Department of Geography AMU, Al garh Azharuddin Sk 202002 : Land use pattern is envisaged on land capability. Land is one of the important resources which plays dominant role in determining human economic, social and cultural progress. .Land Use Pattern is mainly determined by economic, institutional and physical structure. Land area in India is ample but that needs proper care to survive and sustain. The proper utilization of the land is the economic backbone of a region. The total reporting area of western Uttar Pradesh is 7300536 hectare out of which a big proportion of 5597634 hectare (76.67%) is under net sown area followed by other land non agriculture of 833895 hectare (11.42%), forest 331872 hectare (4.55%), current fallow land 181740 hectare (2.49%), old fallow land 99931hectare (1.37%), groves and gardens 45821 hectare (0.63%), barren and un-cultivated land 112952 ABSTRACT hectare (1.55%), cultivated waste land 83112 hectare (1.14%) and pasture land13579 hectare (0.19%). Humans are the major force of change around the globe, transforming land to provide food, shelter, and products for use. The main objective of the paper is to outline the land use change in western Uttar Pradesh during (2001-2011). Land Utilization, Land use pattern, land use change, Land Management, Net sown area, KEYWORDS Pasture land, Cultivable waste land, Current fallow land, Old fallow land, Non- cultivated land, Other Land excluding agriculture, Pasture land, Land under Groves and Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Information of Urban Local Bodies – Uttar Pradesh
    BASIC INFORMATION OF URBAN LOCAL BODIES – UTTAR PRADESH As per 2006 As per 2001 Census Election Name of S. Growth Municipality/ Area No. of No. Class House- Total Rate Sex No. of Corporation (Sq. Male Female SC ST (SC+ ST) Women Rate Rate hold Population (1991- Ratio Wards km.) Density Membe rs 2001) Literacy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I Saharanpur Division 1 Saharanpur District 1 Saharanpur (NPP) I 25.75 76430 455754 241508 214246 39491 13 39504 21.55 176 99 887 72.31 55 20 2 Deoband (NPP) II 7.90 12174 81641 45511 36130 3515 - 3515 23.31 10334 794 65.20 25 10 3 Gangoh (NPP) II 6.00 7149 53913 29785 24128 3157 - 3157 30.86 8986 810 47.47 25 9 4 Nakur (NPP) III 17.98 3084 20715 10865 9850 2866 - 2866 36.44 1152 907 64.89 25 9 5 Sarsawan (NPP) IV 19.04 2772 16801 9016 7785 2854 26 2880 35.67 882 863 74.91 25 10 6 Rampur Maniharan (NP) III 1.52 3444 24844 13258 11586 5280 - 5280 17.28 16563 874 63.49 15 5 7 Ambehta (NP) IV 1.00 1739 13130 6920 6210 1377 - 1377 27.51 13130 897 51.11 12 4 8 Titron (NP) IV 0.98 1392 10501 5618 4883 2202 - 2202 30.53 10715 869 54.55 11 4 9 Nanauta (NP) IV 4.00 2503 16972 8970 8002 965 - 965 30.62 4243 892 60.68 13 5 10 Behat (NP) IV 1.56 2425 17162 9190 7972 1656 - 1656 17.80 11001 867 60.51 13 5 11 Chilkana Sultanpur (NP) IV 0.37 2380 16115 8615 7500 2237 - 2237 27.42 43554 871 51.74 13 5 86.1 115492 727548 389256 338292 65600 39 65639 23.38 8451 869 67.69 232 28 2 Muzaffarnagar District 12 Muzaffarnagar (NPP) I 12.05 50133 316729 167397 149332 22217 41 22258 27.19 2533 892 72.29 45 16 13 Shamli
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter in Pilibhit
    September 29, 1991 ENCOUNTER IN PILIBHIT: Summary Executions of Sikhs in Uttar Pradesh, India On July 13, ten Sikh bus passengers traveling in Uttar Pradesh state were taken into custody and shot dead in what authorities have claimed was an armed "encounter" with police. An eleventh detainee has subsequently disappeared. Eyewitnesses to the detention interviewed by Asia Watch reported that none of the detainees was armed, and Asia Watch believes that the detainees may have been summarily executed. A number of eyewitnesses who have filed affidavits in the courts have subsequently been threatened by the police. Police routinely engage in extrajudicial executions and disappearances of civilians and suspected Sikh militants in Punjab. The Pilibhit incident indicates that the police in Uttar Pradesh are engaging in similar human rights violations against alleged militants in that state. Background Pilibhit, a town in northern Uttar Pradesh (Uttar Pradesh), is located in Pilibhit District in the Terai region, a marshy plane south of the Himalaya mountains on the Nepal border. Pilibhit District is home to a large Sikh community, including many migrants from Punjab.1 The town of Pilibhit also has a significant Sikh minority. The Terai's proximity to Punjab and its large Sikh population have given rise to fears of separatist violence from Punjab spreading to the region. The jungle areas of the Terai have gained a reputation for arms and drugs smuggling from Punjab and across the Nepal border, with both militants from Punjab and criminal gangs profiting in the trade.2 Tensions between migrants from Punjab and local inhabitants who see the newcomers as rivals for land and jobs have also led to violent clashes.3 To combat rising militant and criminal violence, the state police have launched extensive search operations and detained scores of Sikh men.4 Many of those detained have been held under the Terrorist 1 The Terai has been described as a "mini-Punjab" because of its large Sikh population.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilibhit District, U.P
    DISTRICT GROUND WATER BROCHURE OF PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. (A.A.P.: 2012-13) By R.K. Rajput Scientist 'B' CONTENTS Chapter Title Page No. DISTRICT AT A GLANCE ..................3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................6 2.0 CLIMATE & RAINFALL ..................8 3.0 GEOMORPHOLOGY & SOIL TYPES ..................8 4.0 GROUND WATER SCENARIO ..................9 5.0 GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ..................16 6.0 GROUND WATER RELATED ISSUES AND ..................16 PROBLEMS 7.0 AWARENESS AND TRAINING ACTIVITY ..................17 8.0 AREAS NOTIFIED BY C.G.W.A./S.G.W.A. ..................17 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................17 PLATES : (1) INDEX MAP OF PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. (2) DEPTH TO WATER LEVEL MAP, PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. (PRE- MONSOON, JUNE 2012) (3) DEPTH TO WATER LEVEL MAP, PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. (POST- MONSOON, NOV. 2012) (4) GROUND WATER RESOURCE OF PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. (5) HYDROGEOLOGICAL MAP OF PILIBHIT DISTRICT, U.P. 2 DISTRICT AT GLANCE 1. GENERAL INFORMATION i. Geographical Area (Sq. Km.) : 3499 ii. Administrative Divisions (As on 2012) : Number of Tehsil/Block 3/7 Number of Panchayat/Villages 1216 iii. Population (as on 2001 census) : 1645183 iv. Density of Population per Sq.Km. : 470 v. Average Annual Rainfall (mm) : 1256 2. GEOMORPHOLOGY Major Physiographic Units : Tarai, Khader (younger alluvium) Older Alluvium Major Drainages : Sarda, Chauka, Gomti, Khannaurs, Mala and Desha 3. LAND USE (Sq. Km.) a) Forest area : 80010 hactare b) Net area sown : 240085 hactare c) Cultivable area : 378315 hactare 4. MAJOR SOIL TYPES : Tarai Soil, Khader 5. AREA UNDER PRINCIPAL CROPS : Rice, Wheat, Sugarcane, Sunflower 6. IRRIGATION BY DIFFERENT SOURCES (Areas and Numbers of Structures) (Sq.Km.) Dugwells / Persean Wheel : Nil or very low Tubewells/Borewells : 26 Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Govermnment f Utar Pradesh ENVIRONMENTAL Public Works DepartmentEN IO M TA Lucknowjndla ASSESSMENT (PHASE- 11) Public Disclosure Authorized December 2003 E505 Volume 9 PL ' c Co-ordnatlngConsltant (PCC)Swvices t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~La lb, 4114- 1N) seiAies for Wbtr Pradesh Public Disclosure Authorized Consulftncy SStt Rods ProJect Public Disclosure Authorized DHV CONSULTANTS BV Public Disclosure Authorized in associabon with Halcrow and Partners Funding Agency: Operation Research Group Development Consultants Ltd. THE WORLD BANK MDP Consultants ( Pvt) Ltd r s Environment Assessment (Phase 11) DHV Consultants BV December 2003 Project Co-ordinating Consultants Services for the Uttar Pradesh State Roads Project, under IBRD Loan No. 4114-IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (PHASE II) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 THE UTrAR PRADESH STATE ROADS 11 environment parameters, seven routes were PROJECT prioritised for taking up for subsequent detailed design work in the second phase as under: The Uttar Pradesh State Roads Project is financed Route 3 Pilibhit-Khutar: .................. 72.806 km under the World Bank loan number 4114-IN. The Route 4B Lucknow-Bangarmau: ........ 73.229 km Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department, as the Route 6 Sitapur-Bahraich: ............... 88.336 km executing agency, represented the Government Route 7B Azamgarh-Phephana ....... 100.929 km of India in terms of liaison and co-ordination with Route 1OA Gorakhpur-Shahganj: ...... 109.656 km the World Bank. The Project is performed by a Route 11 Moradabad-Bazpur: .......... 36.335 km consortium of consultants consisting of Route 16 Deoria-Ballia: .................. 109.447 km DHV Consultants BV as lead consultant, Halcrow and Partners, Operations Research Group, Total Phase II ................ ....... 590.74 km Development Consultants Ltd., and MDP Consultants Pvt.
    [Show full text]