DOCSLIB.ORG

Chihuahuan Desert Annuals: Importance of Water and Nitrogen'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chihuahuan Desert Annuals: Importance of Water and Nitrogen' Ecology, 68(6), 1987, pp. 2032-2045 ? 1987 by the Ecological Society of America CHIHUAHUAN DESERT ANNUALS: IMPORTANCE OF WATER AND NITROGEN' JULIO R. GUTIERREZ2 AND WALTER G. WHITFORD Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 USA Abstract. We examined the effects of water supplementation and nitrogen amendment on biomass, cover, and density of annual plants on a termite-free and a termite-present area in the Chihuahuan Desert. Soil moisture was higher in the termite than in the termite- free plots, and in the watered than in the unwatered plots during the spring and summer. There were no differences in soil moisture among plots during the winter. Soil nitrogen was higher in the termite-free than in the termite plots. There were no differences in total plant biomass produced in termite and termite-free areas. There were significant differences in relative abundances of species among treatments. Natural rainfall was sufficient for maximum spring-annual biomass development on all plots except for the termite-free unfertilized, unwatered plots. These were the driest plots but had high soil nitrogen. Most of the herbaceous species responded to the water amendments by lengthening growing seasons, increasing density, or increasing biomass. When there was sufficient water for most of the spring annuals, high soil nitrogen levels favored increased densities and bio- masses of Descurainia pinata and Lepidium lasiocarpum. The absence of C4 summer annuals in the high-nitrogen plots suggests that relatively high soil nitrogen adversely affected the summer annuals. Termite-free watered plots had higher soil moisture than the termite-unwatered plots, but summer annuals were relatively abundant on the latter. Water amendments had a greater effect on the species abundances in the termite-free area than in the one with termites. In the area with termites, nitrogen amendments had a greater effect on species abundances. Species diversity and richness were affected by site fertility as was species composition. This study demonstrates that we must understand patterns of soil nitrogen availability and processes affecting nitrogen availability in addition to water availability, in order to understand productivity and species composition of Chihuahuan Desert annual plants. Key words: biomass production; Chihuahuan Desert, community composition, density; desert an- nual plants; irrigation; nitrogen fertilization; phonology; soil moisture; soil nitrogen; termites. INTRODUCTION are C4 species with a high photosynthetic efficiency at high temperatures when water is available (Mulroy and Water is generally considered to be the main limiting Rundel 1977). factor for germination, growth, and productivity of her- If water is a limiting factor, then additional water baceous plants and shrubs in desert ecosystems (Went should increase plant productivity in a desert ecosys- 1948, 1949, Went and Westergaard 1949, Juhren et al. tem. In the Chihuahuan Desert, however, there is some 1956, Tevis 1958a, b, Beatley 1967, 1974, Noy-Meir evidence that productivity does not vary directly with 1974). Annuals occur as live plants only during short water (Ludwig and Flavill 1979, Gutierrez and Whit- periods that are favorable for germination and growth. ford 1987). Nitrogen is generally considered to be lim- They survive as seeds during periods when soil mois- iting after water in North American deserts (West and ture and temperature are not suitable for growth. Des- ert annual plants are classified as summer annuals if Skujins 1978, Skujins 1981). Applications of nitrogen fertilizer had little effect on shrub production but great- they germinate after summer or early autumn rains ly increased production of annual herbs in the northern when ambient temperatures are above 20'C, and as Mojave Desert (Wallace et al. 1978). In the Chihua- winter annuals if they germinate in autumn or early huan Desert, nitrogen fertilization increased the bio- winter rains at temperatures below 200 (Beatley 1974). mass production of the shrub Larrea tridentata and Seasonal differences in temperature affect the growth rates of annual species. Summer annuals have a shorter the grass Erioneuron pulchellum (Ettershank et al. 1978). In the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts, growth of winter life cycle and a greater overlap of phenological phases annuals appears to be so dependent upon nutrient than winter annuals. However, most summer annuals availability that relatively nitrogen-rich "fertile is- lands" beneath shrubs support much larger plants with ' Manuscript received 20 November 1985; revised 2 Sep- higher production efficiency than the nitrogen-poor soil tember 1986; accepted 19 September 1986. 2 Present address: Departamento de Biologia, Universidad in open areas (Mott and McComb 1974, Halvorson de La Serena, La Serena, Chile. and Patten 1975, Patten 1978, Romney et al. 1978). This content downloaded from 128.123.176.43 on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:43:35 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms December 1987 CHIHUAHUAN DESERT ANNUALS 2033 Nevertheless, many subtle effects of both nitrogen and tion ?1 SD is 211 ? 77 mm, with most rainfall oc- water have not been considered in the interaction of curring during late summer from convectional storms. limiting factors in determining whether or not response Maximum summer temperatures reach 40'C and freez- to either will be obtained (Romney et al. 1978). ing temperatures are recorded from October to mid- In the northern Chihuahuan Desert, several studies March (Houghton 1972). showed that subterranean termites affect soil properties (Parker et al. 1982, Brown 1983, and Elkins et al. 1986). METHODS AND MATERIALS Parker et al. (1982), in a study comparing annual plants Original study design and data on a series of plots from which termites had been elim- inated with plots with termites present, found that al- In October and November 1977, a factorial exper- though total annual-plant density and biomass were iment was set up to study the effects of termite removal. not different, dominant species on termite-free plots The experimental design consisted of four blocks with ranked considerably lower than where termites were five completely randomized 30 x 40 m treatment plots present. Parker et al. (1982) attributed these changes per block. Two plots in each block were treated with in species importance to the increased nitrogen levels chlordane, at an application rate of 10.3 kg/ha, to elim- in soils from which termites had been eliminated. In inate termites. Chlordane is a recalcitrant chlorinated a subsequent study Elkins et al. (1986) reported that hydrocarbon that binds to clay particles in the soil, water infiltration was significantly lower on plots where thereby losing its contact toxicity. Subterranean ter- termites had been removed. Thus plots without ter- mites ingest soil and the chlordane apparently is re- mites are characterized by higher soil nitrogen and low- leased in their guts. The only soil animals that did not er water availability. survive the chlordane treatment or recolonize the treat- These relationships led us to re-evaluate the findings ed areas were subterranean termites. Chlordane treat- of Parker et al. (1982). We hypothesized that the species ment had no apparent effect on numbers of ant colo- composition and productivity of Chihuahuan Desert nies. The densities of ants are very low on this annual plant communities vary as a function of the creosotebush-dominatedbajada(Whitford 1977). There interaction between water and nitrogen availability. were six ant colonies on the termite-free plot and five We hypothesized that some species, such as Descu- ant colonies on the termite plot at the time this ex- rainia pinnata and Lepidium lasiocarpum, that in- periment was conducted. The termite-free plot had two creased in importance on termite-free plots (Parker et Pogonomyrmex desertorum colonies, two colonies of al. 1982) are nitrogen-limited species and that other Pheidole spp., and one colony each of Novemessor species, such as Astragalus tephrodes are water-limited cockerelli and Myrmecocystus desertorum. The other species. We hypothesized that productivity would be area had three Pogonomyrmex desertorum colonies and highest and species assemblages most similar on ni- two Pheidole spp. colonies. No active microarthropods trogen-rich sites over a broad range of soil moisture were found on or in treated soils to a depth of 20 cm availability based on the data in Gutierrez and Whit- through the spring of 1978, but in spring 1979 there ford (1987). By imposing irrigation and nitrogen fer- were no detectable differences in soil microarthropods tilization on small plots on termite-free and termite- and nematodes in chlordane-treated and untreated soils. present areas, we were able to obtain a wide range of At the time of this study the populations of soil mi- nitrogen and water contents in the plots to test these croarthropods were higher on termite-free plots (2300 hypotheses. The results of these studies also provide individuals/M2) than on plots with termites present an answer to the question of whether the primary in- (1100 individuals/) (Silva et al. 1985). The taxo- direct influence of termites on annual-plant commu- nomic composition of the soil microarthropod assem- nities is by their effects on nitrogen or on water. blages was not different. Parker et al. (1982) sampled all termite-free and ter- STUDY AREA mite-present plots in their study of changes in nitrogen The study area is located at the Jornada Long-Term and annual plants following termite removal. Elkins et Ecological Research Site on the New Mexico State Uni- al. (1986) utilized plots on two of the original four versity Experimental Ranch, 40 km north northeast of blocks in their study of infiltration and sediment yield. Las Cruces, Dona Ana County, New Mexico. This site Based on those studies, we were confident that differ- is a desert watershed that empties into an ephemeral ences in infiltration, soil water storage, and soil nitro- lake. The watershed varies in elevation from - 1200- gen were attributable to removal of termites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument
    Schmidt, Drost, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2006-1163 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2006-1163 November 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Charles A. Drost, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2006-1163 November, 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C. A., C. A. Drost, and W. L. Halvorson 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument. USGS Open-File Report 2006-1163.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Chihuahuan Desert Network November 2019
    National Park Service Chihuahuan Desert Network U.S. Department of the Interior Inventory & Monitoring Program Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Chihuahuan Sun Newsletter of the Chihuahuan Desert Network November 2019 CHDN Highlights for 2019 It has been my great pleasure to lend a hand with the Chihuahuan protocols in 2018, and with nearly a decade of collaboration Desert Network (CHDN) this year! In addition to keeping the under our belts, it was time to assess the sustainability and efficacy program rolling, we have been pursuing three goals in 2019: of our programs in the face of flat (or even declining) budgets. (1) getting status and trend reporting moving forward (see Recent Unlike when we chose “vital signs” in the early 2000s, we now and Upcoming Reports); (2) refilling the many CHDN vacancies, have precise, detailed data on the time and costs requirements and prioritizing field positions (seeStaff Updates) – we were for each monitoring protocol. SWNC staff aggregated this data down to 2.5 FTE of NPS staff this spring!); and (3) engaging staff to determine our core staffing and budget needs to sustain the in a program review of the Southwest Network Collaboration overall program, and then began developing a range of scenarios (SWNC), which consists of Chihuahuan Desert, Southern Plains for restructuring the program to ensure that we meet our mission (SOPN), and Sonoran Desert (SODN) networks, serving 29 parks into the future. After we finish “kicking the tires” on the details across the American Southwest. of these scenarios, we will present them for your consideration Recognizing our shared resource issues, similar ecosystems, at the upcoming Technical Committee (Resource Managers) and and very limited budgets (all three SWNC networks are in the Board of Directors (Superintendent) meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert-2.Pdf
    Desert Contens Top Ten Facts PG 1 front cover 1 All Deserts are all different but they all have low amounts of rain PG 2 contens 2 Deserts normally have less than 40 CM a year 3 The Sahara desert is in Northern Africa and is over 12 different countries PG 3 top ten facts 4 Sahara desert is the largest desert in the Earth PG 4 whether and climate 5 Only around 20% of the Deserts on Earth are covered in sand 6 Around one third of the Earth's surface is covered in Desert PG 5 desert map 7 The largest cold Desert on Earth is Antarctica PG 6 animals and people that live there 8 Located in South America, the Atacama Desert is the driest place in the world PG 7 what grows there 9 Lots of animals live in Deserts such as the wild dog 10 The Arabian Desert in the Middle East is the second largest hot desert on Earth but is substantially smaller than the Sahara. This is a list of the deserts in Wether And Climate the world Arabian Desert. ... Kalahari Desert. ... Wether Mojave Desert. ... Sonoran Desert. ... Chihuahuan Desert. ... This is a map showing Deserts are usually very, very dry. Even the wettest deserts get less than ten Thar Desert. ... the deserts in the world inches of precipitation a year. In most places, rain falls steadily throughout the Gibson Desert. year. But in the desert, there may be only a few periods of rains per year with a lot of time between rains.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRDS of the TRANS-PECOS a Field Checklist
    TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE BIRDS of the TRANS-PECOS a field checklist Black-throated Sparrow by Kelly B. Bryan Birds of the Trans-Pecos: a field checklist the chihuahuan desert Traditionally thought of as a treeless desert wasteland, a land of nothing more than cacti, tumbleweeds, jackrabbits and rattlesnakes – West Texas is far from it. The Chihuahuan Desert region of the state, better known as the Trans-Pecos of Texas (Fig. 1), is arguably the most diverse region in Texas. A variety of habitats ranging from, but not limited to, sanddunes, desert-scrub, arid canyons, oak-juniper woodlands, lush riparian woodlands, plateau grasslands, cienegas (desert springs), pinyon-juniper woodlands, pine-oak woodlands and montane evergreen forests contribute to a diverse and complex avifauna. As much as any other factor, elevation influences and dictates habitat and thus, bird occurrence. Elevations range from the highest point in Texas at 8,749 ft. (Guadalupe Peak) to under 1,000 ft. (below Del Rio). Amazingly, 106 peaks in the region are over 7,000 ft. in elevation; 20 are over 8,000 ft. high. These montane islands contain some of the most unique components of Texas’ avifauna. As a rule, human population in the region is relatively low and habitat quality remains good to excellent; habitat types that have been altered the most in modern times include riparian corridors and cienegas. Figure 1: Coverage area is indicated by the shaded area. This checklist covers all of the area west of the Pecos River and a corridor to the east of the Pecos River that contains areas of Chihuahuan Desert habitat types.
    [Show full text]
  • Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell
    Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley • Los Angeles • London UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN ENTOMOLGY Editorial Board: Penny Gullan, Bradford A. Hawkins, John Heraty, Lynn S. Kimsey, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Philip S. Ward, Kipling Will Volume 124 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, LTD. LONDON, ENGLAND © 2005 BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hsu, Yu-Feng, 1963– Phylogenetic relationships within Heliodinidae and systematics of moths formerly assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) / Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-520-09847-1 (paper : alk. paper) — (University of California publications in entomology ; 124) 1. Heliodinidae—Classification. 2. Heliodinidae—Phylogeny. I. Title. II. Series. QL561.H44 H78 595.78 22—dc22 2004058800 Manufactured in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments, ix Abstract, xi Introduction ...................................................... 1 Problems in Systematics of Heliodinidae and a Historical Review ............ 4 Material and Methods ............................................ 6 Specimens and Depositories, 6 Dissections and Measurements, 7 Wing Venation Preparation, 7 Scanning Electron Microscope Preparation, 8 Species Discrimination and Description, 8 Larval Rearing Procedures, 8 Phylogenetic Methods, 9 Phylogeny of Heliodinidae ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Checklist for White Sands Missile Range, New
    FLORAL CHECKLIST FOR WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO * A listing of 1132 native and alien vascular taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids) collected and documented on White Sands Missile Range. Includes persistent cultivated species not growing on Main Post and weedy species growing on Main Post. * This list was first compiled by Robert J. Brozka through the Land Condition Trend Analysis (LCTA) Program beginning in 1988. * Numerous collections and determinations were made by Richard Spellenberg (New Mexico State University) 1989 to present. * Many new collections or locations of non-listed species were reported by several wildlife biologists, range scientists, and botanists through the years. The NMNHP contributed many “new” species for the list during their vegetation description contract with White Sands Missile Range. * List currently updated and maintained by David Lee Anderson, WSM-PW-E-ES, WSMR. * Nomenclature according to Allred, K.W. 2007. A Working Index of New Mexico Vascular Plant Names. New Mexico State University. INTEGRATED TRAINING AREA MANAGEMENT (ITAM) ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP BRANCH (WSM-PW-E-ES) WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE 8 MARCH 2007 1 FLORAL CHECK LIST WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO 2007 *- denotes non-native plants ACANTHACEAE - Thorn family Carlowrightia linearifolia (Torr.) Gray heath hedgebush; carlowrightia; heath wrightwort Ruellia parryi Gray Parry's wild petunia Stenandrium barbatum Torr. & Gray bearded stenandrium; early shaggytuft ACERACEAE - Maple family Acer grandidentatum Nutt. var. grandidentatum bigtooth maple; canyon maple *Acer negundo L. var. interius (Britt.) Sarg. boxelder (persisting after cultivation at Ropes Spring) AGAVACEAE - Agave family Agave gracilipes Trel. slimfoot century plant; slimfoot agave Agave parryi Engelm. var.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chihuahuan Desert: Diversity at Risk
    The Chihuahuan Desert: by Cathryn A. Hoyt Diversity at Risk block mountains Spanish ranchers and, later, American separated by down- settlers were drawn to the Chihuahuan faulted basins. Typically, Desert region by the lush grasslands and the basins are internally potential for grazing. Once, grasses in drained, resulting in the the Big Bend region of Texas were said formation of saline to have been tall enough to brush the ephemeral lakes known bellies of horses. Ranchers believed that as playas. Dune fields, the supply of grass to feed livestock was composed of quartz or unlimited. By the mid-19th century, the gypsum sand, are stocking of desert grassland ranges with common throughout the cattle, sheep, and goats was progressing desert, while volcanic at a phenomenal rate. In 1900, the desert Photo by Michael Bender features add additional grasslands of west Texas supported over The Chihuahuan Desert is a land of complexity to the landscape. 9 million herd animals, up from 500,000 superlatives. Covering nearly 250,000 The varied geology of the head in 1830. The ranges of the south- square miles (647,500 square kilome­ Chihuahuan Desert supports a mosaic of west were soon stocked to capacity with ters), it is the largest of the North vegetation communities, ranging from no overflow ranges in case of drought. American deserts. Jutting mountains and desert shrubs such as creosote (Larrea What ranchers could not know is that low basins form a range of habitats tridentata) and tarbush (Flourencia the luxuriant grasslands of the 19th suitable for a broad spectrum of terres­ cernia) at lower elevations to conifer century were the expression of a cooler, trial and freshwater species.
    [Show full text]
  • Y5 Desert Biome
    Y5 Knowledge Organiser Geography: Desert Biome Desert Biome Sahara Desert Jellyfish Key Vocab displaying Desert biomes are dry areas that receive very little The largest hot desert in the world is A description of the average bioluminescence Climate rain. the Sahara. Only the Antartica and weather conditions in a certain Arctic deserts, which are cold deserts, place Deserts can be hot or cold. are bigger than the Sahara. An imaginary circle around the Most hot deserts are found near the equator. The Sahara desert is located in North Africa Equator middle of the Earth The Sahara is the hottest large area on Earth. Irrigation The artificial supply of water to How Some Species Adapt to Around 2.5 million people inhabit the Sahara. Most agricultural land Survive in the Sahara Desert people in the desert are nomads or people who move place to place, but they raise sheep, goats, and Biome Areas of our planet with similar Animals find clever ways to adapt in the Sahara camels. They move in their tents when the grass is climates, landscapes, animals desert. Some are nocturnal, only coming out at eaten in a place. They usually settle in or near an and plants. night when it’s cool and others can go days oasis. Some people raise crops on irrigated land. without drinking. Desert Dry areas that receive very little rain Camels have two rows of eyelashes to protect their eyes from the dust; they have fat in their Species A group of animals, plants or hump so they can go days without food and they other living things that all share can even close their nostrils to stop them inhaling common characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemosynthetic and Photosynthetic Bacteria Contribute Differentially to Primary Production Across a Steep Desert Aridity Gradient
    The ISME Journal https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01001-0 ARTICLE Chemosynthetic and photosynthetic bacteria contribute differentially to primary production across a steep desert aridity gradient 1,2 3,4 5 6 2 Sean K. Bay ● David W. Waite ● Xiyang Dong ● Osnat Gillor ● Steven L. Chown ● 3 1,2 Philip Hugenholtz ● Chris Greening Received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 © The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access Abstract Desert soils harbour diverse communities of aerobic bacteria despite lacking substantial organic carbon inputs from vegetation. A major question is therefore how these communities maintain their biodiversity and biomass in these resource-limiting ecosystems. Here, we investigated desert topsoils and biological soil crusts collected along an aridity gradient traversing four climatic regions (sub-humid, semi-arid, arid, and hyper-arid). Metagenomic analysis indicated these communities vary in their capacity to use sunlight, organic compounds, and inorganic compounds as energy sources. Thermoleophilia, Actinobacteria, and Acidimicrobiia 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: were the most abundant and prevalent bacterial classes across the aridity gradient in both topsoils and biocrusts. Contrary to the classical view that these taxa are obligate organoheterotrophs, genome-resolved analysis suggested they are metabolically flexible, withthecapacitytoalsouseatmosphericH2 to support aerobic respiration and often carbon fixation. In contrast, Cyanobacteria were patchily distributed and only abundant in certain biocrusts. Activity measurements profiled how aerobic H2 oxidation, chemosynthetic CO2 fixation, and photosynthesis varied with aridity. Cell-specific rates of atmospheric H2 consumption increased 143-fold along the aridity gradient, correlating with increased abundance of high-affinity hydrogenases. Photosynthetic and chemosynthetic primary production co-occurred throughout the gradient, with photosynthesis dominant in biocrusts and chemosynthesis dominant in arid and hyper-arid soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change in Grasslands, Shrublands
    Chapter 1 Modeling and Predicting Vegetation Response of Western USA Grasslands, Shrublands, and Deserts to Climate Change Megan M. Friggens1, Marcus V. Warwell2, Jeanne C. Chambers3, and Stanley G. Kitchen4 1 U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Grassland, Shrubland, and Desert Ecosystems Program; Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico 2 U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Forest and Woodland Ecosystems Program; Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Moscow, Idaho 3 U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Grassland, Shrubland, and Desert Ecosystems Program; Great Basin Ecology Laboratory, Reno, Nevada 4 U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Grassland, Shrubland, and Desert Ecosystems Program; Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah Executive Summary Experimental research and species distribution modeling predict large changes in the distributions of species and vegetation types in the Interior West due to climate change. Species’ responses will depend not only on their physiological tolerances but also on their phenology, establishment properties, biotic interactions, and capacity to evolve and migrate. Because individual species respond to climate variation and change independently and differently, plant assemblages with no modern analogs can be expected in areas where novel climate conditions develop. The capacity to accu- rately predict how species distributions and plant assemblages will change under future warming is essential for developing effective strategies for maintaining and restoring sustainable ecosystems. The rate of predicted change in climate is unprecedented relative to the three cen- turies prior to industrialization. A conservative forecast for western North America (using 21 global climate models for the A1B scenario) is a linear change in mean temperatures and precipitation ranging from +2.1 °C to +5.7 °C and -3% to +14%, respectively, over the rest of the century.
    [Show full text]