DOCSLIB.ORG

DR-117-Transpower-New-Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DR-117-Transpower-New-Zealand Submission to the Productivity Commission by Transpower New Zealand Limited on the draft report “Using Land for Housing” 4 August 2015 Address for service: Transpower New Zealand Ltd PO Box 1021 Wellington 6140 Attention: Jo Mooar, Team Leader, Environment Policy and Planning Email: [email protected] Telephone: 04 590 6060 1. Transpower welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Productivity Commission draft report “Using Land for Housing” (the Draft Report). 2. Transpower has extensive experience with plan changes throughout New Zealand, including implementing national policy statements and national environmental standards. Transpower officials would be pleased to meet with the Inquiry Director or other Commission representatives to discuss Transpower’s submission or plan change issues more generally. Transpower – who we are and how we are regulated 3. Transpower New Zealand Limited (Transpower) is the State Owned Enterprise that plans, builds, maintains, owns and operates New Zealand’s high voltage transmission network (the National Grid). 4. Transpower’s shareholding Ministers are the Minister of Finance and the Minister for State- Owned Enterprises. Transpower is required to deliver a reliable and secure electricity supply and operate as a successful business. 5. The National Grid is a natural monopoly, and Transpower's transmission activities are regulated by the Commerce Commission under the Commerce Act 1986. This regulation includes controlling investment in the Grid, and the returns on that investment. 6. Transpower is also regulated by the Electricity Authority which determines how transmission revenue is recovered from transmission users. The cost of transmission investments are recovered directly from electricity consumers. Transpower’s Assets 7. The National Grid extends from Kaikohe in the North Island to Tiwai Point in the South Island (see maps attached as Appendix A). It is the physical infrastructure which transports electricity from where it is generated to the distribution companies which supply electricity to homes and businesses throughout New Zealand (see Appendix B for a diagram of the electricity industry makeup). 8. Electricity underpins economic growth and supports the economic, social and cultural aspirations of all New Zealanders. Electricity contributes actively to the lives of people in New Zealand every day. 9. The National Grid comprises around 12,000 km of high voltage transmission lines and 40,000 towers and poles connecting 167 substations and switching stations across the country. 10. The Grid comprises a high voltage backbone which runs the length of the country and links major generation (such as the geothermal power stations near Taupo and the hydro power stations in the South Island) to major loads in cities. The bulk of the Grid backbone was built 2 around 60 years ago and comprises most of the 220 kV lines throughout New Zealand, along with the High Voltage Direct Current inter-island link between the North and South Islands. 11. Connected to this Grid backbone are regional Grid lines (also owned or operated by Transpower) which connect smaller generation stations and supply regional communities. 12. The National Grid is an interconnected and linear network and an essential part of New Zealand’s electricity system. It provides bulk electricity into substations where the electricity is then converted into lower voltages so it can be used by distribution companies. 13. Without National Grid overhead transmission lines, cables, substations and associated infrastructure, electricity that is generated at power stations cannot reach distribution companies and therefore cannot power New Zealand’s homes, businesses, schools communities and major industrial users. The National Grid literally keeps the country’s lights on. 14. The Grid must be sustainably managed so it can endure and continue to supply a reliable, secure supply of electricity for all New Zealanders. As the country’s dependence on electricity continues, the ability to maintain and upgrade the Grid becomes increasingly important in order to ensure a secure and reliable power supply for the country. Potential adverse impacts of poorly planned development on the National Grid 15. The National Grid has developed over time. Most transmission lines were originally built in rural areas over open land. The majority of the assets in Auckland, for example, were established and commissioned between 1927 and 1969. The majority of overhead lines are not designated, nor do they have easements. They were lawfully established at the time under the relevant Public Works Act and Electricity Act legislation. Transpower relies on “deemed easements” under the Electricity Act 1992 to access, inspect and maintain the lines. 16. Over time, city boundaries have expanded and development has occurred under, and in close proximity to the lines, including structures, houses and other buildings without Transpower’s consent. 17. Transmission assets are long-life assets and can effectively operate virtually indefinitely provided they can be properly maintained, and upgraded and developed as required. 18. Transpower has a continuous programme of work to maintain and enhance its assets all across the country. The ability to access the National Grid in order to carry out these works is essential, and must be maintained into the future. 19. Transpower does not typically own the land on which transmission lines are located, and instead relies on provisions of the Electricity Act 1992 to access and inspect lines. Under that Act, Transpower has little direct control over activities underneath or next to lines that may otherwise affect access, safety or operational activities. 20. The National Grid is critical electricity infrastructure but is not ‘servicing infrastructure’ in the sense that term is used in the Draft Report. The National Grid does not provide power directly to homes, businesses and communities (although it does have some major direct connect 3 customers such as KiwRail and the Marsden Oil Refinery). National Grid infrastructure is not required to be in place before land can be released for development. Houses near National Grid transmission lines and substations 21. Transpower acknowledges the importance of unlocking land for housing and easing development constraints. However, local authority and central government regulatory initiatives should be aware of the potential for housing to constrain the National Grid. 22. Houses located near transmission lines and substations can create safety risks to both landowners and Transpower workers, and result in reverse sensitivity impacts (which could ultimately result in constraints on the Grid). Houses near transmission lines can also constrain Transpower’s access for maintenance and upgrade work (which can in turn, require new assets to be built at significant cost). It is for these reasons that development near the National Grid needs to be carefully managed. 23. The photos attached as Appendix C show residential and subdivision developments that have occurred over time under and around existing National Grid lines. These developments impede maintenance and upgrade activities and create reverse sensitivity impacts on the Grid and increase risks from electrical hazard risks. Underbuild also results in long-term costs to New Zealand. If a programme of regular maintenance and upgrade work cannot take place, then more substantial and costly work is required and much sooner than it would otherwise have been. Protecting the infrastructure now through compatible surrounding land use activities, enables regular maintenance and upgrade work to occur. The National Policy Statement on Electricity Transmission 24. The National Policy Statement on Electricity Transmission (NPSET - attached as Appendix D) was gazetted in March 2008 following a Board of Inquiry and Cabinet process. The NPSET recognises that activities, particularly sensitive activities1 such as houses, can impact adversely on National Grid assets (overhead transmission lines, underground cables and substations). 25. Policy 11 requires local authorities to consult with Transpower to identify “an appropriate buffer corridor within which it can be expected that sensitive activities will generally not be provided for in plans and/or given resource consent”. Transpower considers that this area is 12m either side of centerline and 12m from the outer edge of the support structures. (During maximum wind conditions, the conductors swing much further than this distance – see the photo in Appendix E) 26. Policy 10 requires decision-makers to manage activities to avoid reverse sensitivity effects on the Grid. Decision-makers must also ensure that the operation, maintenance, upgrade and development of the Grid is not compromised. 27. National policy statements must be given effect to in local authority planning documents. Councils had four years from April 2008 to notify and process a plan change or review to give effect to the NPSET objective and policies. Currently, only 27 councils have implemented the NPSET. 1 “Sensitive activities” are defined in the NPSET to include “schools, residential buildings and hospitals”. 4 28. Transpower’s approach to NPSET implementation is to seek consistent provisions nation-wide. A slightly different approach is taken depending on whether an area is greenfield or developed urban / industrial. However, with respect to housing a consistent approach is taken in all planning zones. Simply put, housing should
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distributed Generation – Information Pack
    DISTRIBUTED GENERATION INFORMATION PACK Issue 1.5 December 2017 DDiissttrriibbuutteedd GGeenneerraattiioonn Guidelines & Application Form For small generators – total capacity less than 10 kW (Simplified Approval Process – Part 1A) Issue 1.5 / 20 December 2017 Installing distributed See the attached guide for generation with a This document is subject to details of each numbered step. capacity less than change without any prior notice. 10 kW Interpretation: Please ensure you have the (Simplified Process) Generator - is referred to the person or an latest version. organisation that owns or operates distribution START HERE generators. 1 Note: The Generator can apply for Typically smaller distributed generation systems approval under “Simplified Process” if of this size are rotating (turbine) based systems, the system meets all requirements System Selection solar photovoltaic panels, etc. presented in the “System selection” section. Application Process 2 Note: The Generator will submit the Within 2 business days of receiving the application accompanied with the application, Westpower will advise the Generator additional information and the Submission of that the application has been received. If no application fee. Application response is received within this period, the Generator should contact Westpower. 3 Notes: Within 10 business days of receiving the complete application, Westpower will inspect 1. Westpower will assess the application the distributed generation system and provide for completeness and deficiencies as the final approval. well as compliance with Congestion Westpower will provide the Generator with a Management Policy. Application Approval time and date for the inspection within 2 2. If there are any deficiencies identified Process business days. during the approval process, Westpower will notify the Generator The Generator has to remedy the deficiencies within 10 business days, with what is and pay the applicable fees within 10 business required to correct these deficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kawatiri Energy Ltd 212 Crawford Street PO Box 851 Dunedin, 9016
    Kawatiri Energy Ltd 212 Crawford Street PO Box 851 Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand By email: [email protected] 9 October 2018 Submissions Electricity Authority P O Box 10041 Wellington By email: [email protected] Dear Electricity Authority Board members, RE: Consultation Paper – List of distributed generation eligible to receive ACOT, Upper South Island Kawatiri Energy owns and operates a 4.2MW hydro generating station at Lake Rochfort in the Buller region on the West Coast. This plant has storage and has been operating since 2013. Water comes into the storage lake from a number of tributaries along the Mt Rockfort range and the generation plant can operate at 100% capacity for 2.5 days from a position of full storage. The plant has a frequency governor and is able to support the entire Buller network outside of peak load periods as well as inject power into the transmission network. Kawatiri’s plant is significant in the Buller Electricity Limited (BEL) network. Distributed generation (DG) accounts for ~30% of maximum coincident MWs and GWh demand on that network1. Transpower2 explicitly includes Kawatiri generation in its planning for operating and maintaining the grid to the required standards. Kawatiri is a member of the Independent Electricity Generators Association Incorporated (IEGA) and support the IEGA’s submission. 1 Buller Electricity Limited 2018 Asset Management Plan. Maximum coincident demand on the network is 11MW made up of supply from DG of 3MW and supply from the grid at 8MW. For the year end 31 March 2019 BEL forecast DG to supply 16GWhs of total demand of 54GWhs.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Environment Court of New Zealand Wellington Registry I Te
    In the Environment Court of New Zealand Wellington Registry I Te Kooti Taiao O Aotearoa Te Whanganui-a-Tara Rohe ENV-2019-WLG- Under the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) In the matter of an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Act Between Transpower New Zealand Limited Appellant And Wellington Regional Council Respondent Notice of appeal by Transpower New Zealand Limited Dated 17 September 2019 89 The Terrace P +64 4 472 7877 PO Box 10246 F +64 4 472 2291 Wellington 6143 DX SP26517 Solicitor: N McIndoe E [email protected] 7897549 To The Registrar Environment Court Wellington 1 Transpower New Zealand Limited (‘Transpower’) appeals against the decisions of the Wellington Regional Council (the ‘Respondent’) on the proposed Natural Resources Plan for the Wellington Region (the ‘Proposed Plan’). Transpower owns and operates the National Grid, and its assets across the Wellington Region include 12 substations, 25 transmission lines, three submarine cables, four high voltage direct current links, five overhead fibre cables, and seven communications sites. 2 Transpower made a submission and further submission on the Proposed Plan. 3 Transpower is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’). 4 Transpower received notice of the decisions on 31 July 2019. 5 The decisions were made by the Respondent. Provisions being appealed 6 The part of the decision that Transpower is appealing is the Respondent’s decisions on the Proposed Plan that relate to regionally significant infrastructure, and in particular the operation, maintenance, upgrading and development of the National Grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages on Weathered Plio-Pleistocene Tephra Sequences, Western North Island, New Zealand
    riwtioll: Lowe. D. ~.; TiP.I>CU. J. M.: Kamp. P. J. J.; Liddell, I. J.; Briggs, R. M.: Horrocks, 1. L. 2001. Ages 011 weathered Pho-~Je.stocene tephra sequences, western North Island. New Zealand. Ill: Juviglle. E.T.: Raina!. J·P. (Eds). '"Tephras: Chronology, Archaeology', CDERAD editeur, GoudeL us Dossiers de f'ArcMo-Logis I: 45-60. Ages on weathered Plio-Pleistocene tephra sequences, western North Island, New Zealand Ages de sequences de tephras Plio-Pleistocenes alteres, fie du Nord-Ouest, Nouvelle lelande David J. Lowe·, J, Mark Tippett!, Peter J. J, Kamp·, Ivan J. LiddeD·, Roger M. Briggs· & Joanna L. Horrocks· Abstract: using the zircon fISsion-track method, we have obtainedfive ages 011 members oftwo strongly-...-eathered. silicic, Pliocene·Pleislocelle tephra seql/ences, Ihe KOIIIUQ and Hamilton Ashformalions, in weslern North !sland, New Zealand. These are Ihe jirst numerical ages 10 be oblained directly on these deposils. Ofthe Kauroa Ash sequence, member KI (basal unit) was dated at 2,24 ± 0.19 Ma, confirming a previous age ofc. 1.25 Ma obtained (via tephrochronology)from KlAr ages on associatedbasalt lava. Members K1 and X3 gave indistinguishable ages between 1,68.±0,/1 and 1.43 ± 0./7 Ma. Member K11, a correlQlilV! ojOparau Tephra andprobably also Ongatiti Ignimbrite. was dated at 1.18:i: 0.11 Ma, consistent with an age of 1.23 ± 0.02 Ma obtained by various methodr on Ongaiiti Ignimbrite. Palaeomagnetic measurements indicated that members XI3 to XIJ (top unit, Waiterimu Ash) are aged between c. 1.2 Ma and O. 78 Mo. Possible sources of/he Kauroa Ash Formation include younger \!Oleanic centres in the sOllthern Coromandel Volcanic Zone orolder volcanic cenlres in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Waikato District Council
    WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel REPORT 2 Ohinewai Rezoning 24 May 2021 Commissioners Dr Phil Mitchell (Chair) Mr Paul Cooney (Deputy Chair) Mr Dynes Fulton Mr Weo Maag Page | 1 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel Page | 2 Decision Report 2: Ohinewai Rezoning Report and Decisions of the Waikato District Plan Hearings Panel TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 The APL submission ...................................................................................................................... 9 3 Statutory and planning framework ............................................................................................ 15 4 Site suitability and physical characteristics ............................................................................... 18 5 Three Waters Infrastructure ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Natural hazards ........................................................................................................................... 24 7 Transport and traffic ................................................................................................................... 26 8 Economic effects .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Management Plan 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2030 Contents
    Asset Management Plan 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2030 Contents SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 7 Quality of supply ................................................................................................................... 47 Consumer responsiveness ................................................................................................... 51 Highlights of this AMP ............................................................................................................. 8 Cost performance ................................................................................................................. 52 Conductor renewal ................................................................................................................. 8 Network continuance ........................................................................................................... 54 Duty of care ............................................................................................................................. 8 Utilisation and losses ............................................................................................................ 58 Consumer expectations .......................................................................................................... 8 Objective commitments ....................................................................................................... 59 Uneconomic reticulation issues ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991
    Court File Reference: ENV-2018-CHC-38 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA UNDER The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER Appeals under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Southland Water and Land Plan BETWEEN MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED Appellants AND SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF GUY MEREDITH TE PUKA WAIPARA FOR MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED 15 February 2019 Judicial Officers: Judge Borthwick and Judge Hassan Solicitor acting: Counsel acting: Humphrey Tapper Stephen Christensen In-house counsel Project Barrister 287–293 Durham St North PO Box 1251, Dunedin Metro 9054 Christchurch Central P 027 448 2325 Christchurch 8013 [email protected] [email protected] STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-27) HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2018-CHC-28) ARATIATIA LIVESTOCK LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-29) WILKINS FARMING CO (ENV-2018-CHC-30) GORE AND SOUTHLAND DISTRICT COUNCILS, INVERCARGILL CITY COUNCIL (ENV-2018-CHC-31) DAIRYNZ LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-32) H W RICHARDSON GROUP LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-33) BEEF + LAMB NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2018-CHC-34 AND 35) DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2018-CHC-36) SOUTHLAND FISH & GAME COUNCIL (ENV-2018-CHC-37) MERIDIAN ENERGY LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-38) ALLIANCE GROUP LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-39) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2018-CHC-40) HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POHERE TAONGA (ENV-2018-CHC-41) STONEY CREEK STATION LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-42) THE TERRACES LTD (ENV-2018-CHC-43) CAMPBELL’S BLOCK LTD
    [Show full text]
  • Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package
    Mercer Airport – Submitter #921 – Hearing Highlights Package Chris Dawson - Planning 1.1 The correct approach under the RMA is to determine what district plan provisions (or zone) most appropriately assist Waikato District Council to carry out its functions to achieve the purpose of the Act. The critical evaluation is set out in s32 of the Act which determines determine the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed provisions in achieving the objectives of the Proposed Waikato District Plan (PDP). 1.2 Mercer Airport requires a special zone to recognise that it is already a regionally significant aviation resource and should be formally protected in the District Plan as such. The rezoning, plus Obstacle Limitation Surfaces1 and Air Noise Boundary2 provisions are required to protect that facility and provide it with the operational certainty to grow over time in the future. 1.3 The most appropriate time to provide the statutory protection for the airport and the surrounding community is now before the Mercer area gets more developed than it already is. The implementation of a Special Zone for Mercer Airport is essential to ensure that the Proposed Waikato District Plan is consistent with the relevant higher order documents, specifically the Operative Waikato Regional Policy Statement Policy 6.3 and Method 6.3.1. 1.4 The policy direction of the Rural Zone is a relevant consideration under s32 of the Act, and Lens 2 of the s42A Framework report because that zone informs the existing environment and will continue to be applied over the
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District
    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Complaints Scheme – Accepted Deadlocked Complaints Report for the Period 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2021
    Energy Complaints Scheme – accepted deadlocked complaints report for the period 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2021 Accepted deadlocked complaints The tables below show the number of deadlocked complaints that were accepted for consideration, and the relevant provider. Not all providers in the Energy Complaints Scheme had an accepted deadlocked complaint in this period. A full provider list is available on our website: www.utilitiesdisputes.co.nz The tables also show each providers’ market share, which is calculated by the number of installation control points (ICPs) or equivalent. Total ICPs (or equivalent) were calculated on 28 February 2021 from ICPs on the electricity and gas registries, and customer numbers obtained from providers. Distributors Distributor Accepted Share of Total ICPs Market share deadlocked accepted (or of ICPs (or complaints deadlocked equivalent) equivalent) complaints Alpine Energy 1 1.8% 33,113 1.3% Aurora Energy 7 12.7% 92,584 3.7% Counties Power 2 3.6% 44,978 1.8% Electra 1 1.8% 45,697 1.8% ElectroNet Services * 1 1.8% 0 0.0% Horizon Networks 1 1.8% 24,940 1.0% MainPower 1 1.8% 41,494 1.6% Northpower 3 5.5% 60,326 2.4% Orion 1 1.8% 208,259 8.2% Powerco 6 10.9% 447,295 17.7% The Lines Company (TLC) 3 5.5% 23,716 0.9% Top Energy 4 7.3% 33,049 1.3% Unison 4 7.3% 113,586 4.5% Vector 17 30.9% 699,786 27.7% WEL Networks 3 5.5% 95,851 3.8% Total 55 100% 1,964,674 77.8% Total ICPs (or equivalent) for all electricity and gas distributors: 2,524,362 Key: *Subsidiary of Westpower.
    [Show full text]
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15
    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]