Media Regulations and the Olympic Charter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Olympic Charter
OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 © International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne/Switzerland Tel. + 41 21 621 61 11 – Fax + 41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – July 2020 All rights reserved. Printing by DidWeDo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland Table of Contents Abbreviations used within the Olympic Movement ...................................................................8 Introduction to the Olympic Charter............................................................................................9 Preamble ......................................................................................................................................10 Fundamental Principles of Olympism .......................................................................................11 Chapter 1 The Olympic Movement ............................................................................................. 15 1 Composition and general organisation of the Olympic Movement . 15 2 Mission and role of the IOC* ............................................................................................ 16 Bye-law to Rule 2 . 18 3 Recognition by the IOC .................................................................................................... 18 4 Olympic Congress* ........................................................................................................... 19 Bye-law to Rule 4 -
Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2024 Olympic Games
City of Toronto Feasibility study in respect of hosting the 2024 Olympic Games 11 November 2013 City of Toronto Feasibility Study in Respect of Hosting the 2024 Olympic Games Contents TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 OLYMPIC BID PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE FOR THE 2024 OLYMPIC GAMES .................................................................................................................................. 33 LESSONS LEARNED ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO POTENTIAL BID .................................................................................................................................. 44 ECONOMIC IMPACT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
Report of the Association of National Olympic Committees of Africa
ASSOCIATION DES COMITES NATIONAUX OLYMPIQUES D’AFRIQUE (A.C.N.O.A.) ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA (A.N.O.C.A.) _________________ 50 EC 12 / 09 50TH MEETING OF THE ANOC EXECUTIVE COUNCIL LAUSANNE, DECEMBER 8, 2009 REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA Submitted by lnt. General Lassana PALENFO President. ADRESSE/ADDRESS: P.M.B. 645 MAITAMA ABUJA-NIGERIA TEL: (234) 98705991 (234) 94136478 FAX: (234) 94136480 Email: [email protected] 2 REPORT OF THE ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES OF AFRICA Mr. President, Distinguished members of the Executive Council, Dear Colleagues, Ladies and Gentlemen, This report covers the period that has elapsed since our last Council meeting held in this same city on June 14, 2009. During the six month intervening period, several events worthy of note marked the activities of our continental association. Foremost among these were inter alia: x 13th ordinary Assembly held in Abuja, Nigeria, host country of the ANOCA Headquarters, x Election of a new ANOCA Executive for Olympiad 2009 – 2012 headed by the incumbent President who brilliantly won a second term of office, x Election of a new Secretary General for the Association, x Laying of the foundation stone of the permanent Headquarters of ANOCA, now under construction courtesy the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, x Inaugural meeting of the new Executive Committee held last September, x 12th World Athletics Championship held in Berlin, Germany in July/August 2009, x XIIIth Olympic Congress held in Copenhagen, Denmark, x Election of two new IOC members in Africa at the 121st IOC session in Copenhagen: Engr. -
26. 74Th IOC Session in Varna, 1973. Official Silver Badge
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 34. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. IOC Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With white ribbon. EF. ($175) 35. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. IOC Commission Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With red‑white‑red ribbon. EF. ($150) 36. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. National Olympic Committee Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With green ribbon. EF. ($150) 37. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. NOC Guest Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. With green‑white‑green ribbon. EF. ($150) 38. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. International Federation Badge. Bronze, 33x64mm. Spotty VF‑EF, with light blue ribbon. ($100) 39. 83rd IOC Session in Moscow, 1980. Press Badge. Bronze, 44 45 46 47 48 33x64mm. EF, spot, with dark yellow ribbon. ($150) 26. 74th IOC Session in Varna, 1973. Official Silver Badge. Silvered, 40. 83rd IOC Session Badge in Moscow, 1980. Bronze, 33x64mm. partially enameled, gilt legend, 20x44mm. EF. ($150) With raspberry ribbon. EF. ($150) 27. 77th IOC Session in Innsbruck, 1976. Organizing Committee 41. 11th IOC Congress in Baden-Baden, 1981. IOC Secretariat Badge. Silvered, 35x46mm. With red ribbon, white stripe in center. Badge. Silvered, logo in color, 28x28mm. With white‑red‑white 56 IOC members were present. Lt. wear, abt. EF. Rare. ($575) ribbon. EF. ($200) 28. 22nd Meeting of the IOC and International Federations in 42. 11th IOC Congress in Baden-Baden, 1981. Session Organizing Barcelona, 1976. Television Badge. Gilt, red enamel, 32x50mm. Committee Service Badge. Silvered, logo in color, 27x31mm, with With orange ribbon. EF. -
Rule 50 Guidelines Developed by the IOC Athletes' Commission
Rule 50 Guidelines Developed by the IOC Athletes’ Commission Introduction to the document by the IOC Athletes’ Commission As athletes, we are passionate about our sports and achieving our sporting performance goals. For each and every one of us, that passion continues into everyday life, where we advocate for change on issues of great importance to us and our world. That desire to drive change can naturally make it very tempting to use the platform of an appearance at the Olympic Games to make our point. However, all of us are here at the Olympic Games because, one day, we dreamt of being an Olympian, and maybe even an Olympic champion. The unique nature of the Olympic Games enables athletes from all over the world to come together in peace and harmony. We believe that the example we set by competing with the world’s best while living in harmony in the Olympic Village is a uniquely positive message to send to an increasingly divided world. This is why it is important, on both a personal and a global level, that we keep the venues, the Olympic Village and the podium neutral and free from any form of political, religious or ethnic demonstrations. If we do not, the life’s work of the athletes around us could be tarnished, and the world would quickly no longer be able to look at us competing and living respectfully together, as conflicts drive a wedge between individuals, groups and nations. That is not to say that you should be silent about the issues you care deeply about, and below you will find a list of places where you can express your views at the Olympic Games. -
Olympic Charter 1956
THE OLYMPIC GAMES CITIUS - ALTIUS - FORTIUS 1956 INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE CAMPAGNE MON REPOS LAUSANNE (SWITZERLAND) THE OLYMPIC GAMES FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES RULES AND REGULATIONS GENERAL INFORMATION CITIUS - ALTIUS - FORTIUS PIERRE DE GOUBERTIN WHO REVIVED THE OLYMPIC GAMES President International Olympic Committee 1896-1925. THE IMPORTANT THING IN THE OLYMPIC GAMES IS NOT TO WIN BUT TO TAKE PART, AS THE IMPORTANT THING IN LIFE IS NOT THE TRIUMPH BUT THE STRUGGLE. THE ESSENTIAL THING IS NOT TO HAVE CONQUERED BUT TO HAVE FOUGHT WELL. INDEX Nrs Page I. 1-8 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES 9 II. HULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE 9 Objects and Powers II 10 Membership 11 12 President and Vice-Presidents 12 13 The Executive Board 12 17 Chancellor and Secretary 14 18 Meetings 14 20 Postal Vote 15 21 Subscription and contributions 15 22 Headquarters 15 23 Supreme Authority 15 III. 24-25 NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEES 16 IV. GENERAL RULES OF THE OLYMPIC GAMES 26 Definition of an Amateur 19 27 Necessary conditions for wearing the colours of a country 19 28 Age limit 19 29 Participation of women 20 30 Program 20 31 Fine Arts 21 32 Demonstrations 21 33 Olympic Winter Games 21 34 Entries 21 35 Number of entries 22 36 Number of Officials 23 37 Technical Delegates 23 38 Officials and Jury 24 39 Final Court of Appeal 24 40 Penalties in case of Fraud 24 41 Prizes 24 42 Roll of Honour 25 43 Explanatory Brochures 25 44 International Sport Federations 25 45 Travelling Expenses 26 46 Housing 26 47 Attaches 26 48 Reserved Seats 27 49 Photographs and Films 28 50 Alteration of Rules and Official text 28 V. -
Green Olympics
Green Olympics: intentions and reality Nadezhda Maslova Master of Science Thesis Stockholm 2010 Nadezhda Maslova Green Olympics: intentions and reality Supervisor: Jan Fidler Examiner: Ronald Wennersten Master of Science Thesis STOCKHOLM 2010 PRESENTED AT INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY TRITA-IM 2010:01 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se Abstract The focus of this report is directed to the consideration of the problems related to the difference between commitment of International Olympic Committee to better environmental approach and actual environmental performance of Olympic Games which suppose to follow this commitment since the Games of the year 2002. Mostly qualitative research methodology was utilized in this study. It was based on the interviews with representatives of Greenpeace and World Wildlife Fund, the organizations which are involved in environmental assessment of Olympic Games; exploration of the environmental requirements from International Olympic Committee for carrying out Olympic Games and changes in these requirements through years; evaluation of environmental performance of the past Olympic Games which needed to follow environmental commitment. The research showed that despite continuously improvement in the requirements through years the Host Cities are still managing to fail the preparation of environmental side of the Games. The unsolved problem of still vague requirements was revealed; lack of communication between Non-Government Organizations, which actually give environmental assessment of Olympic Games, and International Olympic Committee was discovered and some political issues were discussed. After the carried work it is recommended to enforce the cooperation between Non-Government Organizations and International Olympic Committee and create common system for evaluation of environmental performance, state more clear requirements for the ecological organization of Olympic Games and change focus from environment to sustainability. -
“History” and Other Stories from the Shadow of Sugar Loaf Mountain
“History” and other stories from the shadow of Sugar Loaf Mountain By Volker Kluge A memorable logo and Rarely have I heard or read the phrase “wrote Olympic torch on a Brazilian history“ so frequently as in the media coverage of the stamp block, franked two and a half weeks in which Olympic Games took on 5th August 2016, place in Rio de Janeiro. On closer inspection it was the day of the opening mostly not about history, but about positive stories with of the Olympic Games. the standardised introduction: “For the first time ...” There were cases of doping, bad behaviour from athletes, wrestling coaches undressing to protest against a verdict, or ungracious judokas refusing to shake hands with their opponent, only extremely rarely let the media write “history”. If one understands history however as an occupation or even science which finding out about the past – and The three dimensional logo is somehow very Brazilian, thus human history – by means of certain sources, then and not just because it made up of the national the flood of material from Rio is considerably reduced. Yet colours of green, blue and yellow. It was chosen after there were some moments which fully deserved to burn a competition between amongst 137 creative agencies. their way into the collective memory. Here is a selection: The idea apparently came to Frederico Gelli the creative director of Tátil Design, whilst he was swimming The Symbol at Ipanema. When he emerged, he is said to have caught sight of the Dois Irmãos (Two Brothers Hill) and At first sight, the logo of the Olympic Games reminded said to himself: “We are in the middle of sculpture me of a baby’s dummy. -
Abstract This Article Timeline the Drug Abuse in Discus Throw Event at Olympic Competition up to 2012
Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, {Bi-Monthly}, ISSN 2249-9598, Volume-VI, May 2016 Special Issue A Historical Timeline of Drug Abuse in Discus throw event at Olympic Game Bhopinder Singh Research Scholar Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences New Delhi 110018, India ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Abstract This article timeline the drug abuse in discus throw event at Olympic competition up to 2012. In 1968 the international Olympic committee (IOC) conducted its first official drug test. The timeline is a document which depicts the major doping violations by the athletes in discus throw event and it also explains its connection with pharmacological advancement. The timeline makes clear that athletes use banned drugs due to pressure rather than willingness to use them, in order to win medals and bring glory to their countries. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction The use, misuse and abuse of drugs shaken the foundations of both amateur and professional sports in recent years. As Lipsyte has observed: There is no argument that drugs pose at least as serious a health problem in major league sports as they do in most high schools. By the time they have made the pros, most athletes have been given so many pills, salves, injections, potions, by amateur and pro coaches, doctors and trainers, to pick them up, cool them down, kill pain, enhance performance, reduce inflammation, and erase anxiety, that there isn’t much they won’t sniff, spread, stick in or swallow to get bigger or smaller, or to feel good. The problem is not new; History indicates that long ago athletes sought a competitive advantage by using various substances which have been dubbed "ergogenic aids." The 3rd century BC saw the Greeks ingest mushrooms to improve athletic performance, gladiators used stimulants in the famed Circus Maximus (circa 600 BC) to fight despite fatigue and injury. -
The Nordic Games and the Olympic Platform As Arena for the Dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian Union
The Nordic Games and the Olympic platform as arena for the dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian Union Sebastian Kühn Innland Norway University of Applied Sciences and Norwegian Olympic Museum [email protected] Abstract Throughout their existence since 1896, the modern Olympic Games have seen quite a number of political conflicts and boycotts. They have been an arena for diplomatic controversies between sovereign countries and even internally within state structures. Still today, the political map in some cases does not correspond with the Olympic world map. In this regard, also the historical case of Norway and Sweden is an interesting one. Formally, both countries had been in a personal union under the Swedish crown since 1815. Nonetheless, Norway participated in the Olympic Games in Paris 1900 in its own right, due to the huge degree of Norwegian self-governance within the union and the subsequent development of its own sports system. This article examines the role of sport for the Norwegian nation building process and the impact of the dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian Union onto the Nordic Games and Norway’s early involvement in the Olympic Movement. Being the most important predecessor for the Olympic Winter Games, the Nordic Games are of particular interest also for Olympic history. Keywords Norway, Nordic Games, Olympic Games, Nationalism, Boycott, Fridtjof Nansen Kühn, S. (2019). The Nordic Games and the Olympic platform as arena for the dissolution of the Swedish- Norwegian Union. Diagoras: International Academic Journal on Olympic Studies, 3, 94–112. Retrieved from http:// diagorasjournal.com/index.php/diagoras/article/view/66 94 Introduction At the end of the 19th century, in a climate of social changes and political turmoil in the union with Sweden, new political structures and especially an emerging liberal movement, resulted in a growing sentiment of Norwegian nationality. -
The IOC AC's Recommendations on Rule 50
The IOC AC’s recommendations on Rule 50 Q&A document What is Rule 50 and why is it in place? The aim of Rule 50 is that each and every athlete can enjoy the experience of the Olympic Games without any divisive disruption. Rule 50 provides a framework to protect the neutrality of sport and the Olympic Games and strives to ensure that the focus at the Olympic Games remains on athletes’ performances, sport, unity and universality. Currently, in addition to the framework that applies during the Games with regard to commercial promotion, Rule 50 states that: “No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in any Olympic sites, venues or other areas”. Why did the IOC AC decide to start this consultation? In June 2020, following the publication by the IOC Executive Board of a resolution condemning discrimination in the strongest possible terms, the IOC Athletes’ Commission (AC) was tasked with exploring additional ways of how Olympic athletes could express their support for the principles enshrined in the Olympic Charter, including during the Olympic Games, while respecting the Olympic spirit. What were the already existing opportunities for athletes to express their views? A wide range of opportunities for athletes to express their views at the Olympic Games existed already before the consultation. They include: • in official press conferences, • through social and traditional media, and • at mixed zones in competition venues. In non-Olympic venues, there are no restrictions, except for those resulting from local laws and regulations. What are the recommendations proposed by the IOC AC? 1. -
21 Top-Ten Discus Throw
Last Updated – 21.10.2015 EUROPEAN ALL TIME RANKINGS MEN DISCUS THROW M35 – 39 (Weight 2.000 kg) DISTANCE NAME NATION BORN MEET PLACE MEET DATE 71.56 Virgilijus Alekna LTU 13.02.1972 Kaunas 25.07.2007 71.26 Rickard Bruch SWE 02.07.1946 Malmö 15.11.1984 70.92 Wolfgang Schmidt GER 16.01.1954 Norden 09.09.1989 69.50 Lars Riedel GER 28.06.1967 Halle 24.05.2003 68.18 Jürgen Schult GER 11.05.1960 Sevilla 24.08.1999 68.12 Josef Nagy ROU 20.11.1946 Zaragoza 22.05.1983 67.80 Alwin Wagner GER 11.08.1950 Melsungen 01.07.1987 67.50 Ercüment Olgundeniz TUR 07.07.1976 Vila Real 27.05.2012 67.39 Zoltan Kovago HUN 10.04.1979 Szombathely 17.06.2015 67.38 Rolf Danneberg GER 01.03.1953 Seoul 01.10.1988 * * * DISCUS THROW M40 – 44 (Weight 2.000 kg) DISTANCE NAME NATION BORN MEET PLACE MEET DATE 70.28 Virgilijus Alekna LTU 13.02.1972 Klaipeda 23.06.2012 65.81 Jürgen Schult GER 11.05.1960 Halle 27.05.2000 65.40 Vladimir Lyakhov RUS 17.06.1937 Viimsi 24.08.1977 65.25 Romas Ubartas LTU 26.05.1960 Vilnius 10.05.2001 64.76 Ludvik Danek CZE 06.01.1937 Munich 17.05.1977 63.62 Dragan Mustapic CRO 23.03.1963 Spalato 04.08.2004 63.22 Alwin Wagner GER 11.08.1950 Eschwege 14.09.1991 63.03 Robert Weir GBR 04.02.1961 Bedford 21.07.2001 62.57 Svein Inge Valvik NOR 20.09.1956 Ski 21.07.1999 62.48 Juhani Tuomola FIN 03.06.1942 Ylivieska 01.07.1984 75.28 Janis Zirnis * * * DISCUS THROW M45 – 49 (Weight 2.000 kg) DISTANCE NAME NATION BORN MEET PLACE MEET DATE 62.62 Pertti Hynni FIN 14.02.1960 Helsinki 26.06.2005 62.52 Knut Hjeltnes NOR 08.12.1951 Modesto 10.05.1997 58.68 Ludvik