Supply 5YS Statement

Shropshire Council

Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement

Data to: 31st March 2019

Published: 16th March 2020 CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary...... 3 Introduction ...... 3 Housing Land Requirement ...... 3 Housing Land Supply ...... 4 Housing Land Requirement and Supply Calculation ...... 4 Conclusion ...... 5 2. Introduction ...... 6 3. Housing Land Requirement ...... 7 Identification of the Housing Land Requirement ...... 7 Identification of the Annual Housing Land Requirement ...... 8 4. Housing Delivery ...... 9 Annual Housing Completions ...... 9 Past Over/Under-Delivery ...... 10 Housing Delivery Test ...... 11 Housing Buffer ...... 12 5. Housing Land Supply ...... 13 Introduction ...... 13 Definition of a Dwelling ...... 13 Deliverable and Developable Sites ...... 15 Build Rates and Lead-in Times ...... 16 Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 ...... 18 Sites with a Prior Approval decision as at 31st March 2019 ...... 19 Sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ as at 31st March 2019 ...... 20 Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan ...... 21 Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) ...... 23 Affordable Housing Sites Including Homes England (HE) Funded Sites ...... 23 Windfall Sites ...... 24 Lapsed Planning Permission ...... 25 6. Housing Land Supply – Calculation ...... 26 Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Requirement ...... 26 Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Supply...... 26 Comparison: Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Requirement & Supply ...... 27 7. Housing Land Supply – Conclusion ...... 27 Five Year Housing Land Supply ...... 27 Conclusion ...... 28

ANNEXES Annex 1. Housing Land Supply across the Plan Period ...... 30 Annex 2. Housing Commitments & Completions ...... 31 Introduction ...... 31 Commitments and Completions ...... 31

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 1 APPENDICES Appendix A. Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Appendix B. Deliverability: Major Development with Outline Permission Appendix C. Sites with a Prior Approval decision as at 31st March 2019 Appendix D. Sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ as at 31st March 2019 Appendix E. Sites allocated within the Development Plan Appendix F. Sites from the SLAA Appendix G. Affordable Housing Sites Seeking HE Funding Appendix H. Windfall Sites Appendix I. Lapsed Permissions

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 2 1. Executive Summary Introduction 1.1. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires Local Authorities to identify and annually review their housing land supply. The purpose of this assessment is to consider whether there are sufficient deliverable sites within a Local Authority Area to allow for the provision of five years’ worth of housing, based on the identified housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against local housing need where strategic policies are more than five years old, unless policies have been reviewed and found up-to-date1. 1.2. This assessment covers the five year period from 2019/20 to 2023/24. The assessment has been undertaken using a cautious and robust methodology which is generally consistent with that endorsed by the SAMDev Plan Inspector within her Report on the SAMDev Plan, whilst also seeking to reflect recent changes to national policy and guidance. 1.3. In conclusion the assessment demonstrates that Shropshire Council currently has 6.42 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing requirement within the adopted Core Strategy (2011) and 8.00 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing need identified using Governments standard methodology.

Housing Land Requirement 1.4. The adopted Local Plan for Shropshire consists of the Core Strategy (2011); Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015); and any adopted formal Neighbourhood Plans. The Shropshire Core Strategy (2011) identifies an ambitious housing requirement for Shropshire of 27,500 dwellings between 2006 and 2026. The Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015) seeks to deliver the housing requirement identified within the Core Strategy. 1.5. In order to allow the phased release of housing land, the Core Strategy (2011) and SAMDev Plan (2015) identify the mechanisms for the release of sites so that a five year supply of housing land can be maintained over the plan period. This includes a trajectory for the phased release of housing land across the plan period. Shropshire Council considers that this trajectory is the most appropriate mechanism for identifying the annual housing land requirement. This approach was endorsed by the SAMDev Plan Inspector. 1.6. To inform an ongoing Local Plan Review, Shropshire Council has completed a Full and Objective Assessment of Housing Need (FOAHN) for Shropshire. This assessment was undertaken using Governments standard methodology for calculating housing need. A report summarising this assessment is available on the Shropshire Council website at: https://shropshire.gov.uk/planning-policy/local- planning/local-plan-partial-review-2016-2036/evidence-base/ 1.7. Although not produced for this purpose, the Shropshire Council FOAHN provides endorsement of the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan, in that housing need over the period from 2016-2026 is less than, but generally consistent with this housing requirement. On the basis of this evidence it is considered appropriate to continue to assess the housing land supply in Shropshire against the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan. However, to demonstrate

1HCLG, (2019), NPPF – Paragraph 73 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 3 robustness of methodology, housing land supply will also be calculated against the Full Objectively Assessed Housing Need calculated using Governments standard methodology.

Housing Land Supply 1.8. Shropshire Council has undertaken a cautious and robust assessment of the housing land supply in Shropshire. This assessment concludes that deliverable sites in Shropshire include: • Sites with extant Planning Permission at the 31st March 2019. • Sites with an extant and positive Prior Approval decision at the 31st March 2019. • Selected sites with a resolution to grant at the 31st March 2019. • Selected sites allocated for development within the Development Plan (adopted) which are likely to be deliverable within five years. • Selected sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) which are likely to be deliverable within five years. • Sites seeking Homes England (HE) funding. • Windfall sites. 1.9. In order to be considered deliverable “sites for housing should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years”.2 1.10. The methodology utilised for this assessment is summarised within the main report of this statement.

Housing Land Requirement and Supply Calculation 1.11. The housing requirement and supply for the five year period starting on the 1st April 2019 have been calculated using a methodology generally consistent with that endorsed by the SAMDev Plan Inspector within her Report. 1.12. Table 1 provides a summary of the calculation of the five year housing requirement: Table 1: Summary of Five Year Housing Requirement Core Strategy FOAHN Housing Category Requirement Need 2019/20 1,390 1,270 2020/21 1,390 1,270 2021/22 1,530 1,270 202 /2 1,530 1,270 (A) 5 Year Requirement: 2 3 2023/24 1,530 1,270

Total 7,370 6,350

(B) Under-Delivery: 539 0 (from earlier in the plan period) (C) Buffer: (5% buffer consisting of supply brought forward from later in the 395 318 plan period to ensure choice and competition. Applied to both the requirement and past under-delivery)

(D) Total Requirement (A) + (B) + (C): 8,304 6,668

2HCLG (2019), NPPF – Annex 2: Glossary Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 4 1.13. Table 2 provides a summary of the housing land supply in Shropshire considered deliverable within the next five years, as at the 1st April 2019: Table 2: Summary of deliverable housing land supply (as at 1st April 2019) Category Net Dwellings (A) Dwellings on sites with Planning Permission* 7,754 (B) Dwellings on sites with Prior Approval* 115 (C) Selected sites with a 'resolution to grant'* 269 (D) Dwellings on Allocated Sites estimated to be completed within 5 years* 1,322 (E) SLAA Sites deliverable within 5 years* 301 (F) Emerging Affordable Housing Sites* 307 (G) Windfall Sites** 598

Total: (A) + (B) + (C) + (D) + (E) + (F) + (G) 10,666

*A very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with Planning Permission; Prior Approval; ‘resolution to grant’ Planning Permission; allocation within the adopted Local Plan; identified within the SLAA Sites; and Emerging Affordable Housing Sites will not be delivered in the five year period has been applied to figures in this table. **Based on historic delivery rates and expected future trends.

Conclusion 1.14. Table 3 brings together the five year housing land requirement and the results of the assessment of the five year housing land supply in Shropshire. 1.15. This table confirms that Shropshire Council is able to demonstrate a five year housing land supply as at the 1st April 2019. Table 3: Comparison: Five Year Housing Requirement and Supply Core Strategy FOAHN Housing Category Requirement Need Total Requirement: 8,304 6,668

Total Supply: 10,666 10,666

Over / Under Provision: +2,362 +3,998

Number of Years Supply: 6.42 8.00

1.16. Identifying land sufficient for the delivery of enough housing to meet the housing requirement for the area is one of the key responsibilities of a Local Planning Authority. Shropshire Council is in a position where it is able to demonstrate sufficient deliverable sites for 6.42 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing requirement within the adopted Core Strategy and 8.00 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing need identified using Governments standard methodology. The focus must therefore be on delivery of sustainable housing, which is ultimately a market function undertaken by the development industry. 1.17. Please Note: The sites which make up the various components of the five year housing land supply as at the 31st March 2019 are included within Appendices A-H of the Shropshire Council: Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019).

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 5 2. Introduction 2.1. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires Local Authorities to identify and annually review their housing land supply. The purpose of this assessment is to consider whether there are sufficient deliverable sites within a Local Authority Area to allow for the provision of five years’ worth of housing, based on the identified housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against local housing need where strategic policies are more than five years old, unless policies have been reviewed and found up-to-date. 2.2. In addition, the NPPF specifies that this assessment of housing land supply should allow for the provision of an additional buffer, moved forward from later within the plan period, to allow for choice and competition in the market. 2.3. Identifying land sufficient for the delivery of enough housing to meet the housing requirement for the area is one of the key responsibilities of a Local Authority. However, delivery of sustainable housing development is ultimately undertaken by the development industry. 2.4. This statement sets out the assessment of housing land supply in Shropshire as at 1st April 2019 and has been undertaken using a cautious and robust methodology which is generally consistent with that endorsed by the SAMDev Plan Inspector within her Report3 on the SAMDev Plan, whilst also seeking to reflect recent changes to National policy and guidance. The five years covered within the assessment are from 2019/20 to 2023/24. 2.5. The statement comprises six main components, these are the: • Housing land requirement; • Housing delivery; • Housing land supply; • Housing land requirement and supply calculation; • Housing land supply conclusion; and • Schedules of sites included within the housing land supply. 2.6. Within all aspects of this assessment, account has been taken of dwellings recorded as completed at the base date for the supply (31st March 2019) and residential units lost through any development scheme, to produce a net figure. 2.7. In order to ensure that the appraisal of the deliverability / developability of the housing land supply is robust, a comprehensive methodology for the appraisal of sites has been utilised, further details of which are provided within this statement. Ultimately this assessment represents a cautious appraisal and presents a robust position on the housing land supply in Shropshire. 2.8. This assessment will be updated annually as further information becomes available regarding the delivery of housing sites. 2.9. In addition, further analysis of the information emerging from this review has been undertaken in order to provide: • A review of the total housing land supply across the plan period; and • A breakdown of the housing commitments and completions by settlement. 2.10. The results of this further analysis are provided as Annexes to this report. 2.11. Please Note: A separate assessment of Gypsy and Traveller accommodation (requirement and supply)4 has been undertaken.

3www.shropshire.gov.uk/media/8232/samdev-plan-inspectors-report.pdf 4Shropshire Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showperson Accommodation Assessment (2017), https://shropshire.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-planning/local-plan-partial-review-2016-2036/evidence-base/ Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 6 3. Housing Land Requirement Identification of the Housing Land Requirement 3.1. The NPPF states “Local Planning Authorities should identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide a minimum of five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against their local housing need where the strategic policies are more than five years old”5. 3.2. The adopted Local Plan for Shropshire consists of the Core Strategy (2011); Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015); and any adopted formal Neighbourhood Plans. The Shropshire Core Strategy (2011) sets out the Council’s vision, strategic objectives and broad spatial strategy to guide future development and growth in Shropshire to 2026. A key aspect of this spatial strategy was the identification of an ambitious housing target for Shropshire within Policy CS1 of 27,500 dwellings between 2006 and 2026, based upon evidence produced in preparation for the West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy. 3.3. The Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015) seeks to deliver the housing requirement identified within the Core Strategy (as recognised in Policy MD1), through the identification of deliverable sites for housing development and policies to appraise development proposals. 3.4. Shropshire Council is currently progressing a Local Plan Review. To inform this review, Shropshire Council has completed a Full and Objective Assessment of Housing Need (FOAHN) for Shropshire. This assessment was undertaken using Governments standard methodology for calculating housing need. A report summarising this assessment is available on the Shropshire Council website at: https://shropshire.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-planning/local-plan-partial-review- 2016-2036/evidence-base/ 3.5. Although not produced for this purpose, the Shropshire Council FOAHN provides endorsement of the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan, in that housing need over the period from 2016-2026 is less than, but generally consistent with this housing requirement. 3.6. Specifically, the first ten years of this FOAHN coincide with the last ten years of the period addressed by the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan (2016- 2026). According to the FOAHN, the total housing need calculated over the period from 2016 to 2036 is 25,400 dwellings, which equates to some 1,270 dwellings per annum. Using this annual need, the total need for the period 2016-2026 can be calculated at 12,700 dwellings. The housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan for this same ten year period is some 14,6006, equating to 1,390 dwellings per annum (2016-2021); and 1,530 dwellings per annum (2021-2026). It is therefore apparent that the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan is sufficient to deliver the FOAHN for this ten year period. 3.7. As such it is considered appropriate to continue to assess the housing land supply in Shropshire against the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan. 3.8. However, to ensure robustness, housing land supply will also be calculated against the FOAHN calculated using Governments standard methodology.

5HCLG, (2019), NPPF – Paragraph 73 6Using the housing requirement within Core Strategy Policy CS1 and the phased approach described in Paragraph 5.5 of the explanatory text to Core Strategy Policy CS10, against which Shropshire Council is seeking to deliver and which is being used within the calculation of housing land supply, as described below. Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 7 Identification of the Annual Housing Land Requirement Adopted Local Plan 3.9. In order to allow the phased release of housing land, the Core Strategy and SAMDev Plan identify the mechanisms for the release of sites, so that a five year supply of housing land can be maintained over the plan period. This includes a trajectory for the phased release of housing land across the plan period within the supporting text of Core Strategy Policy CS10: Managed Release of Housing Land. This trajectory specifies that housing development will be phased in five year time bands, as follows: 2006/2011 – 1,190 dwellings per annum. 2011/2016 – 1,390 dwellings per annum. 2016/2021 – 1,390 dwellings per annum. 2021/2026 – 1,530 dwellings per annum. 3.10. Shropshire Council considers that this trajectory is the most appropriate mechanism for identifying the annual housing land requirement. The Inspectors Report of the SAMDev Plan corroborates this position concluding that: “The purpose of the housing trajectory in the CS is to illustrate the expected rate of housing delivery over the plan period, demonstrating how the Council will maintain delivery of a five-year supply of housing land to meet their housing target. It reflects timing constraints and was accepted by the Inspector. The phasing is to be subject to review, linked to monitoring through the SHLAA and the Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement. The CS therefore provides justification for the Council’s preferred approach (scenario 1) for demonstrating how the SAMDev Plan will maintain delivery of a five year supply of housing land and meet the overall housing requirement. To do otherwise would not properly reflect the CS. The use of the phasing bands set out in the CS as the base requirement against which the five year housing land supply position is to be calculated is therefore justified”. 3.11. The trajectory is also consistent with local circumstances, as it: • Reflects the impact of the economic downturn, which supressed housing delivery in the early part of the plan period; • Reflects timing constraints due to the need for infrastructure to be put in place; • Recognises the acceleration of housing delivery which would result from the adoption of the SAMDev Plan; and • Reflects local circumstances and the objectives of the Development Plan. 3.12. Furthermore, whilst neither the NPPF nor the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) specify what approach should be utilised for identifying the annual housing land requirement, both make reference to the need to prepare a housing trajectory and review delivery against it7. 3.13. The use of the trajectory approach was discussed with the Shropshire Council Developer Panel (consisting of representatives of the various scales of the development industry operating in Shropshire) prior to the Examination of the SAMDev Plan, who accepted that the use of the trajectory was reasonable, subject to the approach taken on other methodological issues, which have also been reflected within this assessment.

Housing Need 3.14. The Full and Objective Assessment of Housing Need (FOAHN) for Shropshire, undertaken using Governments standard methodology for calculating housing need, indicates an annual housing need of 1,270 dwellings.

7HCLG (2019), NPPF - Paragraph 73 HCLG, (2019,), NPPG – Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment, Paragraph: 024 Reference ID: 3-024- 20190722, Revision date: 22 07 2019 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 8 4. Housing Delivery Annual Housing Completions Adopted Local Plan 4.1. Using the annual housing land requirement identified within Core Strategy Policy CS10 and its supporting text, Shropshire Council has undertaken a review of housing completions within previous years of the plan period. The results of this review are summarised in Table 4. Table 4: Housing Completions in Shropshire (2006/07 - 2018/19) Annual Housing Over provision / Cumulative Financial Year Requirement1 Completions shortfall provision 2006/07 1,190 1,228 +38 +38 2007/08 1,190 1,106 -84 -46 2008/09 1,190 1,265 +75 +29 2009/10 1,190 1,112 -78 -49 2010/11 1,190 984 -206 -255 2011/12 1,390 724 -666 -921 2012/13 1,390 847 -543 -1,464 2013/14 1,390 1,079 -311 -1,775 2014/15 1,390 1,155 -235 -2,010 2015/16 1,390 1,402 +12 -1,998 2016/17 1,390 1,910 +520 -1,478 2017/18 1,390 1,876 +486 -992 2018/19 1,390 1,843 +453 -539 1Identified using the housing trajectory from the supporting text of Policy CS10 of the Core Strategy.

4.2. These results have also been depicted graphically in Figure 1 below:

Figure 1: Housing Completions in Shropshire (2006/07 - 2018/19)

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 9 4.3. Completion rates experienced over the period from 2011/12 to 2016/17 increased year on year and remained very high in 2017/18 and 2018/19, significantly exceeding the housing requirement. It is considered that this reflects current market conditions and the benefits of an up-to-date Local Plan.

Housing Need 4.4. The Full and Objective Assessment of Housing Need (FOAHN) undertaken by Shropshire Council covers the period from 2016 to 2036. The results of an assessment of housing completions against the identified housing need for previous years within this period is summarised in Table 5.

Table 5: Housing Completions in Shropshire (2016/17 - 2018/19) Annual Housing Over provision / Cumulative Financial Year Need Completions shortfall provision 2016/17 1,270 1,910 +640 +640 2017/18 1,270 1,876 +606 +1,246 2018/19 1,270 1,843 +573 +1,819

4.5. These results have also been depicted graphically in Figure 2 below:

Figure 2: Housing Completions in Shropshire (2006/07 - 2018/19)

Past Over/Under-Delivery Adopted Local Plan 4.6. Housing completions in recent years have exceeded the relevant annual housing requirement, reflecting current market conditions and the benefits of an up-to-date Local Plan. However, primarily as a result of the economic downturn, completions in earlier years fell below the relevant annual housing requirement. This has resulted in a cumulative shortage of 539 dwellings. 4.7. The results of the economic downturn are particularly evident in Figure 1, which demonstrates the drop in the number of dwellings completed each year between 2008/09 and 2011/12 and the gradual uplift in the number of completions between 2011/12 and 2016/17, with completions remaining high in 2017/18 and 2018/19. Due to the high level of completions achieved over the last few years, under- delivery from earlier in the plan period has significantly reduced.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 10 4.8. Nationally, a number of methodological approaches have been utilised for redistributing past under-delivery within the plan period, in order to ensure the total housing requirement identified for a plan is met within the lifespan of the plan. The two most common are: • Requiring past under-delivery to be delivered within the next five years of the plan (often referred to as ‘the Sedgefield approach’). • Requiring past under-delivery to be delivered over the remaining plan period (often referred to as ‘the Liverpool approach’). 4.9. The NPPG on Housing Supply and Delivery states that “The level of deficit or shortfall will need to be calculated from the base date of the adopted plan and should be added to the plan requirements for the next 5 year period (the Sedgefield approach), then the appropriate buffer should be applied. If a strategic policy- making authority wishes to deal with past under delivery over a longer period, then a case may be made as part of the plan-making and examination process rather than on a case by case basis on appeal”8. 4.10. As such, Shropshire Council will continue to apply ‘the Sedgefield approach’ and include all past under-delivery over the next five years.

Housing Need 4.11. The Full and Objective Assessment of Housing Need (FOAHN) undertaken for Shropshire covers the period from 2016 to 2036. Since 2016, housing completions have consistently exceeded need. As such during this period there has been no under-delivery of housing against need.

Housing Delivery Test 4.12. The NPPF states “To maintain the supply of housing, local planning authorities should monitor progress in building out sites which have permission. Where the Housing Delivery Test indicates that delivery has fallen below 95% of the local planning authority’s housing requirement over the previous three years, the authority should prepare an action plan in line with national planning guidance, to assess the causes of under delivery and identify actions to increase delivery in future years”. 4.13. Government has published new guidance on the housing delivery test, including a measurement rule book, which explains how it is calculated. 4.14. In summary, the housing delivery test is “a percentage measurement of the number of net homes delivered against the number of homes required, as set out in the relevant strategic policies for the areas covered by the Housing Delivery Test, over a rolling three year period”9. The calculation can therefore be summarised as follows:

Housing Delivery Test (%) = Total net homes delivered over three year period Total number of homes required over three year period 4.15. The guidance then goes on to identify the method for calculating homes delivered and required. In summary: • “The number of net homes delivered is the National Statistic for net additional dwellings over a rolling three year period, with adjustments for net student and net other communal accommodation”9.

8HCLG, (2018), NPPG – Housing Supply and Delivery, Paragraph: 031 Reference ID: 68-031-20190722, Revision date: 22 July 2019 9HCLG (2018), Housing Delivery Test Measurement Rule Book Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 11 • The number of homes required is the lower of: o “the latest adopted housing requirement, including any unmet need from neighbouring authorities which forms part of that adopted housing requirement. This requirement will be the stepped housing requirement (or the annual average requirement where there is no stepped requirement)” 9, where the housing requirement is less than five years old; or o “the minimum annual local housing need figure (and any need from neighbouring authorities which it has been agreed should be planned for, and which has been tested at examination) for that authority calculated with a base date of 1st April each year” 9. 4.16. Government has recently published the results of the Housing Delivery Test for 2019 which indicate that within Shropshire over the last three years housing delivery exceeded housing required, with delivery at 172%10 of need. 4.17. This calculation undertaken can be summarised as follows:

Housing Delivery Test = Total net homes delivered over three year period (5,629) (172%) Total number of homes required over three year period (3,278)

4.18. If the housing requirement within the adopted Local Plan were used to calculate the Housing Delivery Test, over the last three years housing delivery exceeded housing required, with delivery at 135% of need.

Housing Delivery Test = Total net homes delivered over three year period (5,629) (135%) Total number of homes required over three year period (4,170)

Housing Buffer 4.19. The NPPF specifies that when assessing the five year housing land supply, Local Authorities should “identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide a minimum of five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against their local housing need where the strategic policies are more than five years old. The supply of specific deliverable sites should in addition include a buffer (moved forward from later in the plan period) of: a) 5% to ensure choice and competition in the market for land; or b) 10% where the local planning authority wishes to demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable sites through an annual position statement or recently adopted plan, to account for any fluctuations in the market during that year; or c) 20% where there has been significant under delivery of housing over the previous three years, to improve the prospect of achieving the planned supply”11. 4.20. The NPPF indicates that significant under delivery of housing will be “measured against the Housing Delivery Test, where this indicates that delivery was below 85% of the housing requirement”12. 4.21. The Housing Delivery Test indicates that within Shropshire, housing completions over the last three years have significantly exceeded housing required, as such a 5% buffer will be applied.

10HCLG (2020), Housing Delivery Test: 2019 measurement 11HCLG (2019), NPPF – Paragraph 73 12HCLG (2019), NPPF – Footnote 39 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 12 5. Housing Land Supply Introduction 5.1. Shropshire Council has undertaken a cautious and robust assessment of the housing land supply in Shropshire. This part of the statement identifies the methodological approach utilised during this assessment.

Definition of a Dwelling 5.2. In order to undertake an assessment of housing land supply, a definition of a dwelling must be identified. This ensures consistency and robustness of the assessment. 5.3. Shropshire Council considers that the most appropriate definition of a dwelling for the purposes of an assessment of housing land supply is that provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), as it is data collected by the ONS that underpins the assessment of Housing Need and the subsequent Housing Requirement. 5.4. This definition has also been endorsed by the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG), the department responsible for producing the NPPF and NPPG. The NPPF and NPPG identify the requirement for Local Authorities to undertake an annual assessment of housing land supply and outline the parameters for such an assessment. 5.5. Furthermore, the definition is consistent with that applied when determining whether a unit would generate an award under the New Homes Bonus and whether it should be subject to Council Tax. 5.6. This definition of a dwelling is as follows: “a self-contained unit of accommodation. Self-containment is where all the rooms (including kitchen, bathroom and toilet) in a household’s accommodation are behind a single door which only that household can use. Non-self-contained household spaces at the same address should be contained together as a single dwelling. Therefore a dwelling can consist of one self-contained household space or two or more non-self-contained household spaces at the same address”13. Extra Care Accommodation 5.7. The term 'extra care accommodation' can be applied to a range of accommodation types intended to meet the needs of those who need assistance (primarily but not necessarily the elderly). These include 'assisted living', 'extra' or 'very sheltered housing', 'close care', 'continuing care retirement communities' (more than 50 units) and 'retirement villages'. 5.8. Equally, the use-class of extra care accommodation varies significantly and is not necessarily a reflection of the type of accommodation provided. Therefore Shropshire Council considers that it is most appropriate to apply the ONS and HCLG definition of a dwelling when determining if these units of accommodation are dwellings. 5.9. Where the units comply with this definition (are self-contained, with their own living space, bedroom, bathroom and kitchen behind their own front door) then they are considered to represent a dwelling(s) for the purpose of this assessment of housing land supply. 5.10. The SAMDev Plan Inspector has endorsed the approach taken by Shropshire Council in relation to these units, stating within Paragraph 49 of her report that “It is

13HCLG, (2012), Guidance: Definitions of general housing terms Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 13 reasonable to include care home accommodation within the 5 year housing land supply where it is in the form of self-contained units. Shropshire Council has been very cautious in its consideration of which extra care/care home facilities can be included within the supply, giving consideration to the details of a particular scheme rather than simply the description of development which may be misleading”14. Other communal accommodation for the elderly 5.11. Shropshire Council has not previously included communal accommodation for the elderly within its housing land supply. 5.12. However, updated guidance within the NPPG on Housing Supply and Delivery specifies that “Local planning authorities will need to count housing provided for older people, including residential institutions in Use Class C2, as part of their housing land supply. This contribution is based on the amount of accommodation released in the housing market”15. 5.13. The NPPG on Housing for Older and Disabled People specifies how such accommodation should be accounted for within the housing land supply, stating: “plan-making authorities will need to count housing provided for older people against their housing requirement. For residential institutions, to establish the amount of accommodation released in the housing market, authorities should base calculations on the average number of adults living in households, using the published Census data”16. 5.14. Currently the average number of adults living in all households is 1.8. As such the calculation of the contribution of completed communal accommodation to total housing supply would be as follows: “Net bedrooms in communal accommodation Average number of adults in households in England (currently 1.8)”17 5.15. For consistency, the NPPG on Housing Supply and Delivery also specifies that “Communal accommodation, including student accommodation and other communal accommodation, can count towards the Housing Delivery Test…”18. 5.16. Shropshire Council commenced monitoring consents/completions on other communal accommodation for the elderly from the 2018/19 monitoring period. The contribution that such properties make to the housing completions and housing land supply have been calculated consistent with the NPPG. Student accommodation 5.17. National guidance on housing land supply states “All student accommodation, whether it consists of communal halls of residence or self-contained dwellings, and whether or not it is on campus, can in principle count towards contributing to an authority’s housing land supply based on: • The amount of accommodation that new student housing releases in the wider housing market (by allowing existing properties to return to general residential use); and / or • The extent to which it allows general market housing to remain in such use, rather than being converted for use as student accommodation.

14PINS (2015), Report on the Examination into Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan, https://shropshire.gov.uk/media/8232/samdev-plan-inspectors-report.pdf 15HCLG, (2019), NPPG – Housing Supply and Delivery, Paragraph: 035 Reference ID: 68-035-20190722, Revision date: 22 July 2019 16HCLG, (2019), NPPG – Housing for Older and Disabled People, Paragraph: 016a Reference ID: 63-016a-20190626, Revision date: 26 June 2019 17HCLG (2018), Housing Delivery Test Measurement Rule Book 18HCLG (2019), NPPG – Housing Supply and Delivery, Paragraph: 041 Reference ID: 68-041-20190722, Revision date: 22 July 2019 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 14 5.18. This will need to be applied to both communal establishments and to multi bedroom self-contained student flats. Several units of purpose-built student accommodation may be needed to replace a house which may have accommodated several students. 5.19. Authorities will need to base their calculations on the average number of students living in student only accommodation, using the published census data, and take steps to avoid double-counting. The exception to this approach is studio flats designed for students, graduates or young professionals, which can be counted on a one for one basis. A studio flat is a one-room apartment with kitchen facilities and a separate bathroom that fully functions as an independent dwelling”19. 5.20. Currently the average number of students in student only households is 2.5. As such the calculation of the contribution of completed communal accommodation to total housing supply would be as follows: Net bedrooms in student communal accommodation Average number of students in student only households in England (currently 2.5)20

5.21. For consistency, the NPPG on Housing Supply and Delivery also specifies that “Communal accommodation, including student accommodation and other communal accommodation, can count towards the Housing Delivery Test…”21. 5.22. This approach has been applied to student accommodation within the housing land supply from the 2017/18 monitoring period. The contribution that such properties make to the housing completions and housing land supply have been calculated consistent with the NPPG. Annexes 5.23. In conformity with the ONS and HCLG definition of a dwelling, Shropshire Council considers that annexes represent self-contained dwellings where they: • Are self-contained (have their own living space, bedroom, bathroom and kitchen); • Have their own point of access; and • Are not subject to conditions on occupancy, that restrict a self-contained household from being formed within them. 5.24. Consequently where annexes comply with these criteria, they will be considered as part of the review of the housing land supply.

Deliverable and Developable Sites 5.25. When reviewing the housing land supply, Shropshire Council is required to undertake an assessment of sites to determine if they are deliverable, developable or not currently developable for housing. This will then inform the consideration of when the site is likely to come forward for development. 5.26. Sites to be included within the first five years of the housing land supply should be considered deliverable. The NPPF states that “To be considered deliverable, sites for housing should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular:

19HCLG, (2019), NPPG – Housing Supply and Delivery, Paragraph: 034 Reference ID: 68-034-20190722, Revision date: 22 July 2019 20HCLG (2018), Housing Delivery Test Measurement Rule Book 21HCLG (2019), NPPG – Housing Supply and Delivery, Paragraph: 041 Reference ID: 68-041-20190722, Revision date: 22 July 2019 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 15 a) sites which do not involve major development and have planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years (for example because they are no longer viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans). b) where a site has outline planning permission for major development, has been allocated in a development plan, has a grant of permission in principle, or is identified on a brownfield register, it should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years”22. 5.27. It is apparent that this is not intended to be an exhaustive list of the types of site which can be considered deliverable and that sites do not need to involve major development and have Planning Permission or detailed Planning Permission to be included within the first five years of the housing land supply. Rather the requirement is that there is clear evidence, through assessment of a site, that concludes that it is available now; offers a suitable location for development now; and is achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered within five years. 5.28. Sites can be included within the housing land supply beyond the first five years where they are considered developable. For a site to be considered developable the NPPF requires that “sites should be in a suitable location for housing development with a reasonable prospect that they will be available and could be viably developed at the point envisaged”22. 5.29. For the purposes of this statement deliverable and developable sites include: • Sites with extant Planning Permission at the 31st March 2019. • Sites with an extant and positive Prior Approval decision at the 31st March 2019. • Selected sites with a resolution to grant at the 31st March 2019. • Selected sites allocated for development within the Development Plan (adopted) which are likely to be deliverable within five years. • Selected sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) which are likely to be deliverable within five years. • Sites seeking Homes England (HE) funding. • Windfall sites. Build Rates and Lead-in Times 5.30. When reviewing housing land supply, Shropshire Council must also make assumptions about both lead-in times and build rates on development sites.

Lead-in Times 5.31. Lead-in time represents the period of time before construction starts on a site. There are a range of factors that will dictate lead-in times, however to ensure consistency in its assessment, Shropshire Council has identified very cautious standard assumptions on lead-in times, which reflects the broad range of applications received. 5.32. The Council’s assumptions on lead-in times assume a period of between 10-27 months from the preparation of an application to the completion of the first dwelling on a site. This reflects the significant range of applications the Council receives, which in turn reflects the varied nature of the County. This includes a significant volume of applications on small sites which will usually be subject to less pre-

22HCLG (2019), NPPF – Annex 2: Glossary Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 16 application discussion and negotiation on Section 106 Legal Agreements, through to larger schemes, mixed use proposals and urban extensions in Shrewsbury; the market towns; and key centres. It is considered that the assumptions made by the Council on lead-in times are both realistic and locally reflective. 5.33. Table 6 summarises the Council’s lead-in time assumptions:

Table 6: 'Standard' Lead-in Times in Shropshire Action Months as a range Preparation of Application 1 6 Local Planning Authority Consideration of Application 2 3 Completion of S.106 Legal Agreement 1 6 Preparation of Reserved Matters Application (if applicable) 8-21 2 3 & Discharging of Conditions Local Planning Authority Consideration of Reserved 2 3 Matters Application(s) (if applicable) Site Mobilisation Infrastructure Implementation 2 6 2-6 Build First Dwelling Totals: 10 27 10-27

5.34. Development occurring on larger sites in Shropshire is more than capable of commencement within six months following the grant of approval, with examples provided below. This is not surprising considering many larger sites are Local Plan allocations and benefit from significant amounts of design work, site marketing and discussions with the Council prior to the submission of an application. 5.35. For instance: • 13/03055/FUL Land at Aston Street, Shifnal (115 dwellings): Decision notice issued on 24th March 2014. Commencement on 7th April 2014. Development completed during 2017/18. • 13/00893/FUL Phase 1 of the Shrewsbury South SUE (291 dwellings): Decision notice issued on 9th May 2014. Commencement on 27th May 2014. As at the 31st March 2019, 144 dwellings have been completed on this site. • 14/01264/FUL Mount Farm, Whitchurch (100 dwellings): Decision notice issued on 23rd December 2014. Commencement on 23rd March 2015. Development completed during 2018/19. • 14/05343/FUL Land West of Ellesmere Road, Shrewsbury (147 dwellings): Decision notice issued on 26th March 2015. Commencement on 15th June 2015. Development completed during 2018/19. • 16/02618/FUL Phase 3 of the Shrewsbury South SUE (159 dwellings): Decision notice issued on 19th December 2016. Commencement on 16th January 2017. As at the 31st March 2019, 44 dwellings have been completed on this site. • 16/05474/FUL Land East of A53, Shrewsbury Road, Shawbury (50 dwellings): Decision notice issued 4th October 2017. Commencement on 21st October 2017. As at the 31st March 2019, 35 dwellings have been completed on this site. • 17/05554/FUL Land to the North of Hall Bank, Pontesbury (86 dwellings): Decision notice issued 10th September 2018. Commencement on 17th September 2018. As at 31st March 2019, 9 dwellings have been completed on this site.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 17 5.36. These assumptions represent a cautious assessment of the timescales taken to undertake key stages in the development process such as preparing for and undertaking pre-application discussions; carrying out supporting investigations and surveys; securing Planning Permission; completing Section 106 Legal Agreements; discharging pre-commencement conditions; and undertaking pre-construction works. 5.37. Where possible, to increase accuracy of assumptions on lead-in times, they have been further refined through discussions with landowners, land promoters and developers which ensure that Shropshire Council can have significant confidence that the assumptions for each site are realistic.

Build Rates 5.38. Build rates represent the number of dwellings that it is anticipated will be completed on a site, per-annum. Similar to lead-in times, there are a range of factors that will dictate build rates. 5.39. To ensure consistency Shropshire Council has identified ‘standard’ build rates, based on its own monitoring of development activity and feedback from the Shropshire Council Developer Panel (consisting of representatives of the various scales of the development industry operating in Shropshire), which indicated that build rates on sites in Shropshire are around 30-40 units/year. It is the experience of many local developers that, “the right site sells well” in Shropshire. 5.40. Further feedback from the Panel has also indicated that on large sites (benchmark estimate of 250 dwellings plus) that the build-out rate could be multiplied to take into consideration that two or more developers may be constructing housing units at the same time. 5.41. These ‘standard’ build rates are summarised in the Table 7 below: Table 7: 'Standard' Build Rates in Shropshire Location of Development Anticipated Build Rate* North Shropshire 25 dwellings/year Central Shropshire 38 dwellings/year South Shropshire 36 dwellings/year *Sites of more than 250 dwellings will be subject to a large site multiplier

5.42. It is considered that these build rates represent a fair and reasonable reflection of the local market. 5.43. However, where possible, to further increase accuracy of assumptions on build rates, proactive discussions were undertaken with landowners, land promoters and developers regarding build-rates on specific sites, to ensure that Shropshire Council can have significant confidence that the assumptions for build rates are realistic.

Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 (Appendices A and B) 5.44. The NPPF states that: “To be considered deliverable, sites for housing should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular: a) sites which do not involve major development and have planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years (for example because they are no longer viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans).

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 18 b) where a site has outline planning permission for major development, has been allocated in a development plan, has a grant of permission in principle, or is identified on a brownfield register, it should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years”23. 5.45. Consistent with the NPPF, Shropshire Council considers that the majority of sites with an extant Planning Permission can be considered deliverable and are therefore suitable for inclusion within the first five years of the housing land supply. Where the extant Planning Permission is an outline consent for major development, the sites deliverability has been documented within Appendix B. 5.46. To ensure the robustness of this assessment of housing land supply, Shropshire Council has applied a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with Planning Permission will not be delivered in the five year period. This 10% non-delivery rate is an approach utilised by many Local Planning Authorities; is in line with standard industry practice; and was endorsed by the SAMDev Plan Inspector within her report. 5.47. Ultimately there is no mandatory requirement for a non-delivery rate to be applied to sites with Planning Permission within the housing land supply. Shropshire Council considers that the use of a consistent 10% non-delivery rate is appropriate and represents a robust approach to variations in the market and other factors that might inhibit development and ensures a comprehensive and consistent assessment of housing land supply. 5.48. Shropshire Council recognises that some sites will take longer than five years to build out, therefore the number of dwellings expected to be completed annually on deliverable land has been informed by the ‘standard’ assumptions on lead-in times and build rates – refined through proactive discussions with landowners, land promoters and developers where possible. Where development of the sites is expected to take more than five years to complete, only the equivalent part of the site is included within the first five years of the housing land supply. 5.49. These sites are identified within Appendix A and B of this document.

Sites with a Prior Approval decision as at 31st March 2019 (Appendix C) 5.50. Sites with Prior Approval are comparable to sites with detailed Planning Permission. 5.51. As such, similar to sites with Planning Permission, Shropshire Council considers that the majority of sites with an extant Prior Approval decision (where the decision is that either Prior Approval is not required or is approved) can be considered deliverable and are therefore suitable for inclusion within the first five years of the housing land supply. 5.52. This is consistent with Governments stated intention when they introduced amendments to Permitted Development Rights, for example: “under new Class MB agricultural buildings will be able to change to up to three dwelling houses (C3), and carry out associated building works, so that rural businesses can diversify while increasing housing supply”24 (my emphasis). 5.53. However, similar to sites with Planning Permission, it is recognised that a small proportion of sites with a Prior Approval decision (where the decision is that either

23HCLG (2019), NPPF – Annex 2: Glossary 24Explanatory Memorandum to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development (Amendment and Consequential Provisions) (England) Order 2014 Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 19 Prior Approval is not required or is approved) may not be implemented. With this consideration in mind and to ensure the robustness of this assessment, Shropshire Council has applied a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with Prior Approval will not be delivered in the five year period. 5.54. These sites are identified within Appendix C of this document.

Sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ as at 31st March 2019 (Appendices D) 5.55. In some cases Shropshire Council has ‘resolved to grant’ Planning Permission on a site, subject to the signing of a S106 Legal Agreement. Selected sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ have been included in the housing supply as they are considered to be deliverable (as demonstrated by the fact that they have sufficiently progressed to the point where a Planning Application has been submitted and a ‘resolution to grant’ the application has been reached). 5.56. When considering the deliverability of sites with a ‘resolution to grant’, Shropshire Council has exercised caution in order to ensure that its assessment of the housing land supply is robust. Therefore sites have only been considered deliverable where they comply with one or more of the following criteria: • The site subject to the Planning Application is an existing Local Plan site or proposed SAMDev Plan site. • The site subject to the Planning Application is located within a settlement development boundary and the settlement has been identified as a suitable location for infill/windfall development within the SAMDev Plan. • The site subject to the Planning Application is for affordable housing, rural workers housing or an agricultural workers dwelling. • The site subject to the Planning Application is for the conversion of an existing building, such as a barn. • The site subject to the Planning Application is for the redevelopment of a select number of sustainable brownfield sites. • The site subject to the Planning Application had a resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Legal Agreement at the 31st March 2019 and has subsequently been approved. 5.57. Furthermore, for consistency, where the ‘resolution to grant’ relates to outline consent for major development, the sites deliverability has been further documented. 5.58. However, despite this robust approach to filtering Planning Applications with a ‘resolution to grant’, it is recognised that not all ‘resolution to grant’ sites will eventually have a successfully signed S106 Legal Agreement and be implemented. Consequently, Shropshire Council has again applied a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ Planning Permission will not be delivered in the five year period. 5.59. It should be stressed, of course, that inclusion of a Planning Application with a ‘resolution to grant’ within this assessment of Housing Land Supply is without prejudice to the completion of the S106 Legal Agreement and final Planning Application decision. 5.60. These sites are identified within Appendix D of this document.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 20 Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan (Appendix E) 5.61. Within Shropshire, strategic locations for development were identified in the adopted Core Strategy and sites have been allocated for development within the SAMDev Plan. For further information on the relationship between these two documents, please refer to Chapter 3: Housing Land Requirement. Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUE’s) 5.62. The Core Strategy identifies Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUE’s) in Shrewsbury and Oswestry (Core Strategy Policies CS2 and CS3 respectively) as strategic locations for growth. These SUE’s are summarised in Table 8:

Table 8: Shropshire Sustainable Urban Extensions Location Name Status • A Full Planning Application (13/00893/FUL) for 291 dwellings (phase 1 of this Shrewsbury South SUE) was approved on the 9th May 2014, with development commencing on the 27th May 2014. Work is progressing at pace (144 dwellings were completed as at the 31st March 2019). • An Outline Planning Application (14/04428/OUT) was approved on the second phase of this site on the 23rd June 2015. A series of Reserved Matters Applications for engineering works; construction of the access road; and the location of the attenuation ponds were granted in March; May; and September 2016. Engineering works have now commenced; the balancing pond formed; and multiple points of access to the site established. Reserved Matters Application (17/06149/REM) granted in April 2018 for Shrewsbury 164 dwellings and development of these dwellings has commenced. Shrewsbury st South SUE Reserved Matters Application (19/00048/REM) granted post 31 March 2019 for 49 dwellings. Reserved Matters Application (19/04460/REM) pending consideration for 175 dwellings. There are expected to be at least three, possibly four developers on this site, however Shropshire Council have been very cautious in its lead-in time and delivery rate assumptions. • A further Full Planning Application (16/02618/FUL) for the third and final phase of the SUE (159 dwellings) was approved on the 19th December 2016. Work is progressing at pace (44 dwellings were completed as at the 31st March 2019). Forecasted completion rates for this site are very likely to be overly cautious.

• An Outline Planning Application (14/00246/OUT) submitted by David Wilson Homes and Jennings Estates Ltd was granted on the 13th Shrewsbury Shrewsbury September 2019 for 296 dwellings. West SUE Forecasted completion rates for this site are very likely to be overly cautious. • An Outline Planning Application (16/02594/OUT) is pending decision having been submitted by J Ross Developments Ltd for up to 600 dwellings covering two phases of the Oswestry SUE. • Another Outline Planning Application (17/06025/OUT) is pending Eastern consideration having been submitted by Jennings Estates Ltd for up to Oswestry Gateway 150 dwellings on another phase of the Oswestry SUE. SUE We understand that Reserved Matters Applications will follow grant of these outline consents and that the developers are very keen to commence development on the site. Cautious assumptions on lead-in times have been produced identifying commencement in 2021/22.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 21 5.63. The latest information available has been drawn upon to assess the deliverability (including lead-in times and delivery rates) of each of the SUE’s as part of this assessment of the housing land supply in Shropshire. Other Allocated Sites 5.64. The adopted SAMDev Plan identifies further housing land allocations, which together with other sources of housing land supply are sufficient to ensure the delivery of the agreed Core Strategy vision and housing requirements. Deliverability of Allocations 5.65. The NPPF states that: “To be considered deliverable, sites for housing should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular: a) sites which do not involve major development and have planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years (for example because they are no longer viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans). b) where a site has outline planning permission for major development, has been allocated in a development plan, has a grant of permission in principle, or is identified on a brownfield register, it should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years”25. 5.66. Consistent with this definition of deliverable, Shropshire Council has taken a cautious approach to the inclusion of SAMDev Plan allocations within the first five years of the housing land supply, only including those which are considered to be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and are achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. The availability, suitability and achievability of allocations has been documented within Appendix E. 5.67. Furthermore, only the numbers of homes that are considered deliverable within five years are counted, which in many cases is considerably less than the sites’ full capacity. Deliverability has been informed by ‘standard’ lead in times and build rates identified for this assessment, refined through pro-active discussions with landowners, land promoters and developers to ensure that Shropshire Council can have significant confidence that assumptions for each site are realistic. 5.68. To ensure the robustness of this assessment, a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on Allocated Sites will not be delivered in the five year period. 5.69. Please Note: It must be stressed, of course, that inclusion of strategic locations identified in the Core Strategy and SAMDev allocations in the housing land supply is without prejudice to the Development Plan process or the determination of any planning application for the site. 5.70. These sites are identified within Appendix E of this document.

25HCLG (2019), NPPF – Annex 2: Glossary Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 22 Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) (Appendix F) 5.71. Within Shropshire, windfall development on unallocated sites forms a significant proportion of all development that takes place. Indeed, in 2018/19 around 70% of the total housing completions occurred on windfall sites. 5.72. The Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) is a technical assessment of the suitability; availability; and achievability (including viability) of land for housing and employment development. The SLAA considers sites and broad locations for residential development where they are capable of delivering 5 or more dwellings. Generally, sites of less than 0.2 hectares are unlikely to achieve these thresholds. 5.73. The SLAA was published in late 2018, following a call for sites in early 2017. In excess of 2,000 sites and broad location were included within the assessment which will inform the ongoing Local Plan Review. 5.74. As the SLAA assessment includes consideration of both sustainability (in accordance with the NPPF); and the suitability, availability and achievability (including viability) of sites, consistent within the definition of deliverability, it is considered reasonable to include the accepted sites which have an expected yield in the plan period, within the housing land supply. 5.75. However, to ensure further robustness, a full site by site review has been undertaken of SLAA sites as part of this assessment of housing land supply and only those where the information available gives confidence that the sites are deliverable, have been included within the first five years of the housing land supply. Those sites considered to be developable within the plan period have been included within the housing land supply for the remainder of the plan period. 5.76. This review also included consideration of any updated information regarding site capacity and build rates - reflecting feedback from relevant site promoters, developers and/or agents. 5.77. Around 85 sites are included within the housing land supply of which around 40 sites are considered deliverable within the next five years. 5.78. To ensure the robustness of this assessment, a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on SLAA sites will not be delivered in the five year period. 5.79. Please Note: The SLAA database is continuously updated. Appendix F includes those SLAA sites from the current active SLAA database that are considered likely to be delivered within the next five years or developable within the plan period. It should be noted that SLAA sites represent only those sites which the Council are aware of and are included within the SLAA database. In reality, there is likely to be a significant amount of additional site opportunities within the development boundaries of identified settlements. 5.80. It should be stressed, of course, that inclusion of a SLAA site within this assessment of Housing Land Supply is without prejudice to the determination of any planning application for that site.

Affordable Housing Sites Including Homes England (HE) Funded Sites (Appendix G) 5.81. Policies CS5 and CS11 of the Core Strategy; Policy MD7a of the SAMDev Plan; and the supplementary guidance within the accompanying Type and Affordability of Housing Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), support the provision of affordable housing, including on sites outside settlement development boundaries

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 23 and in rural hamlets as an exception to normal planning policies. Furthermore, the Council has consistently enabled such exception sites to come forward over the years, with great success. 5.82. A detailed review of affordable housing sites has been undertaken for this statement, with many such sites being included within the list of sites with Planning Permission; a Planning Application with a ‘resolution to grant’ or a site submitted to the SLAA and considered deliverable or developable. 5.83. However, there are a limited number of sites that Shropshire Council is aware of, on which schemes are being progressed and applications for Homes England (HE) funding have/will be submitted which do not yet have a Planning Permission/Planning Application with a ‘resolution to grant’ or were not submitted for consideration within the SLAA. 5.84. Shropshire Council has therefore undertaken a separate appraisal of these sites. Those which are considered deliverable have been included within this assessment of housing land supply. These sites are identified within Appendix G of this document. 5.85. Please Note: Shropshire Council has a close working relationship with Affordable Housing providers. We understand that there is a long lead-in process to taking forward an Affordable Housing scheme, particularly where it is subject to HE funding – which often also requires specific delivery timescales. Sites that have progressed to the point of applying for funding have had significant pre-application and community consultation, consequently the Affordable Housing providers and Shropshire Council have confidence that the sites that are considered deliverable within this assessment will come forward within the 5 year period. 5.86. To ensure the robustness of this assessment, Shropshire Council has applied a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on affordable housing sites including HE funded sites will not be delivered in the five year period. 5.87. However, it should be stressed, of course, that the inclusion of affordable housing sites Including HE funded sites within this assessment of Housing Land Supply is without prejudice to the determination of any planning application for that site.

Windfall Sites (Appendix H) 5.88. In addition to the larger SLAA sites previously considered, there is a need to take into account individual and small housing schemes. Small scale windfall sites of less than five dwellings have always represented a significant component of the housing land supply in Shropshire, and it is anticipated that this will remain the case. 5.89. Indeed, the Local Plan recognises the importance of windfall development in Shropshire and makes allowances for appropriately located windfall sites (where they accord with the policies within the Local Plan). This supports the conclusion that windfall development does and will continue to represent an important part of the housing land supply. 5.90. Furthermore, the average completion rate on all small scale windfall sites of less than 5 dwellings over the plan period thus far (2006/07-2018/19), is some 382 dwellings per annum. The actual rate for 2018/19 was some 390 dwellings. This again supports the conclusion that windfall development does and will continue to represent an important part of the housing land supply.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 24 5.91. The importance of small scale windfall housing in Shropshire is not surprising given that Shropshire is a large rural County containing the town of Shrewsbury, 18 other smaller settlements identified as market towns or key centres; and hundreds of other villages and hamlets. Consequently there is a constant and significant recycling of previously developed land; significant numbers of infill developments; high numbers of conversions of barns and other rural buildings; and high uptake of affordable housing under the ‘build your own’ affordable housing scheme (supported by Shropshire Council within Policies CS5 and CS11 of the Core Strategy; MD7a of the SAMDev Plan; and supplementary guidance within the Type and Affordability of Housing SPD). 5.92. The above factors therefore endorse the inclusion of a very cautious 299 dwellings per year, for years 4 and 5 of the supply.

Lapsed Planning Permission (Appendix I) 5.93. Often sites that have previously secured Planning Permission where the permission is not subsequently implemented within permitted timescales remain developable. Specifically, in many circumstances the site remains suitable for development and available for development and will be achievable later within the plan period, particularly as market conditions continue to improve. 5.94. Consequently, Shropshire Council has undertaken an assessment of sites with capacity for more than five dwellings (as it is anticipated that sites of less than 5 dwellings would be included within the windfall allowance, as identified in Appendix H of this document) in order to determine whether they are suitable for inclusion within the housing land supply. 5.95. Whist none of these sites have been included within the first five years of the housing land supply, many have been deemed suitable for inclusion within the latter part of the plan period. These sites are identified within Appendix I of this document. 5.96. However, it should be stressed, of course, that inclusion of a site with a lapsed Planning Permission within this assessment of Housing Land Supply is without prejudice to the determination of any future planning application for that site.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 25 6. Housing Land Supply – Calculation Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Requirement 6.1. Using the methodological approach outlined in Chapters 3 and 4, the housing requirement for the five year period starting on the 1st April 2019 has been calculated. 6.2. Table 9 provides a summary of the calculation of the five year housing requirement: Table 9: Summary of Five Year Housing Requirement Core Strategy FOAHN Housing Category Requirement Need 2019/20 1,390 1,270 2020/21 1,390 1,270 2021/22 1,530 1,270 202 /2 1,530 1,270 (A) 5 Year Requirement: 2 3 2023/24 1,530 1,270

Total 7,370 6,350

(B) Under-Delivery: 539 0 (from earlier in the plan period) (C) Buffer: (5% buffer consisting of supply brought forward from later in the 395 318 plan period to ensure choice and competition. Applied to both the requirement and past under-delivery)

(D) Total Requirement (A) + (B) + (C): 8,304 6,668

Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Supply 6.3. Using the methodological approach outlined in Chapter 5, a comprehensive assessment of housing land in Shropshire has been undertaken. 6.4. Table 10 provides a summary of the housing land supply in Shropshire considered deliverable within the next five years, as at the 1st April 2019: Table 10: Summary of deliverable housing land supply (as at 1st April 2019) Category Net Dwellings (A) Dwellings on sites with Planning Permission* 7,754 (B) Dwellings on sites with Prior Approval* 115 (C) Selected sites with a 'resolution to grant'* 269 (D) Dwellings on Allocated Sites estimated to be completed within 5 years* 1,322 (E) SLAA Sites deliverable within 5 years* 301 (F) Emerging Affordable Housing Sites* 307 (G) Windfall Sites** 598

Total: (A) + (B) + (C) + (D) + (E) + (F) + (G) 10,666 *A very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with Planning Permission; Prior Approval; ‘resolution to grant’ Planning Permission; allocation within the adopted Local Plan; identified within the SLAA Sites; and Emerging Affordable Housing Sites will not be delivered in the five year period has been applied to figures in this table. **Based on historic delivery rates and expected future trends.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 26 6.5. Shropshire Council includes a very cautious assumption that 10% of deliverable dwellings on sites with Planning Permission; Prior Approval; ‘resolution to grant’ Planning Permission; allocation within the adopted Local Plan; identified within the SLAA Sites; and Emerging Affordable Housing Sites will not be delivered in the five year period. This assumption is reflected within the figures provided within Table 10 of this document. 6.6. The actual number of dwellings considered deliverable in the next 5 years in each of these categories before this deduction is applied are: • Dwellings on sites with Planning Permission: 8,615. • Dwellings on sites with Prior Approval: 128. • Dwellings on selected sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ Planning Permission: 299. • Dwellings on selected sites Allocated for Development: 1,469 • Dwellings on selected SLAA sites: 334. • Dwellings on sites seeking Homes England (HE) funding: 341. 6.7. The sites which make up the various components of the five year housing land supply as at the 1st April 2019 are included within Appendices A-I of this statement.

Comparison: Shropshire Five Year Housing Land Requirement & Supply 6.8. Table 11 brings together the five year housing land requirement and the results of the assessment of the five year housing land supply in Shropshire. 6.9. This table confirms that Shropshire Council is able to demonstrate a five year housing land supply as at the 1st April 2019. Table 11: Comparison: Five Year Housing Requirement and Supply Core Strategy FOAHN Housing Category Requirement Need Total Requirement: 8,304 6,668

Total Supply: 10,666 10,666

Over / Under Provision: +2,362 +3,998

Number of Years Supply: 6.42 8.00

7. Housing Land Supply – Conclusion Five Year Housing Land Supply 7.1. This comprehensive review of the housing land supply establishes that there are sufficient deliverable sites to allow for the provision of five years’ worth of housing (plus an additional buffer moved forward from later within the plan period, to allow for choice and competition in the market), based on the identified housing requirement for Shropshire. Indeed there is currently 6.42 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing requirement within the adopted Core Strategy (2011) and 8.00 years supply of deliverable housing land against the housing need identified using Governments standard methodology.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 27 Conclusion 7.2. Shropshire Council, through its Local Plan has positively planned for an ambitious but deliverable level of housing development to 2026. This trend is continuing with ongoing work on the Local Plan Review which is also proposing an ambitious but deliverable housing requirement. 7.3. Furthermore, the Council was involved in the production of the Marches Local Enterprise Partnership’s (LEP) High Level Planning and Housing Statement “Poised for Growth”26. As these documents make clear, Shropshire Council is committed to creating an environment for successful housing delivery, and is working with the development industry and local communities to ensure that sustainable development is brought forward. 7.4. The reality is there is a significant and growing supply of housing land in Shropshire, sufficient to demonstrate a housing land supply to meet the housing land requirement; address past under-delivery; and allow for necessary buffers to the supply. 7.5. However, whilst Shropshire Council is taking a positive approach to planning for housing and there is a significant amount of land available for housing development, ultimately it is the responsibility of the development industry to deliver sustainable development, consisting of the right types of housing, in the right locations and within the right timescales.

26www.shropshire.gov.uk/marcheslepplanninghousingstatement/index.html Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 28 Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement Annexes

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 29 Annex 1. Housing Land Supply across the Plan Period A1.1. In addition to the assessment of the housing land supply available over the next five years, Shropshire Council has also undertaken a wider assessment of deliverable and developable sites, in order to determine whether there is sufficient housing land available to deliver the identified housing requirement (27,500 dwellings). A1.2. In order to ensure a robust assessment, the methodology used for appraising housing land supply across the total plan period is consistent with that used for the appraisal of sites within the first five years. A1.3. Thus far, between 2006/07 and 2018/19, 16,531 dwellings have been completed within Shropshire. Consequently, the outstanding housing requirement for Shropshire is some 10,969 dwellings. A1.4. Table 12 provides a summary of the housing supply in Shropshire, up to the end of the plan period (2026), compared to the outstanding housing requirement in Shropshire: Table 12: Housing Land Supply across the Plan Period Category Net Dwellings Years 1 - 5 Supply: 10,666 Supply: Years 6 - 7 Supply: 3,123 Total: 13,789 Outstanding Requirement: 10,969 Over Provision: +2,820 Percentage Over Provision: +25.71%

A1.5. Table 12 illustrates that there is already sufficient deliverable or developable housing land identified in Shropshire to meet the total outstanding housing requirement within the plan period. A1.6. Indeed, there is currently sufficient housing land to deliver more than 13,750 dwellings over the next 8 years. Current supply therefore exceeds the remaining housing requirement by a significant amount (25.71%). Furthermore supply is only likely to increase given the cautious approach that has been taken within this assessment, and in particular the approach taken to the inclusion of windfall sites within the housing land supply. A1.7. The sites which make up the various components of the housing land supply over the plan period at the 1st April 2019 are also included within Appendices A-I of this statement.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Page 30 Annex 2. Housing Commitments & Completions Introduction A2.1. The information resulting from the assessment of the housing land supply for Shropshire can also be utilised to determine the number of dwellings (net) committed and completed by settlement in Shropshire.

Commitments and Completions A2.2. As it is recognised that this is an area of interest for these communities, a summary of the net commitments and completions is provided in Table 13: Market Towns; Table 14: Hubs and Clusters; and Table 15: Wider Rural Area: Table 13: Housing Commitments and Completions in the Market Towns Commitments Completions Settlement (2006/07 – 2018/19) Sites with Planning Permission or Prior Allocations without Planning Approval as at the 31st March 2019 Permission as at the 31st March 2019 Albrighton 66 171 77 Bishops Castle 84 62 40 Bridgnorth 757 38 500 Broseley 213 72 0 Church Stretton 213 62 37 Cleobury Mortimer 308 43 7 Craven Arms 110 48 325 Ellesmere 395 348 0 Highley 181 47 0 Ludlow 480 802 0 Market Drayton 502 474 0 Minsterley & Pontesbury 211 157 14 Much Wenlock 127 21 0 Oswestry 996 116 1,127 Shifnal 1,106 573 0 Shrewsbury 4,371 3,019 798 Wem 426 72 100 Whitchurch 570 748 60 Total: 11,116 6,883 3,085 *The completions in each of the market towns include exception development which contributes to the housing requirement for the town. Please Note: The figures provided are net.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Table 14: Housing Commitments and Completions in SAMDev Plan Hubs and Clusters Commitments Completions Settlement Place Plan Sites with Planning Allocations without (2011/12 – 2018/19) Permission or Prior Approval Planning Permission (as (as at 31st March 2019) at 31st March 2019) Abcot, Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton Heath, Bishops Castle 1 11 0 Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Brompton, Marton, Middleton, Pentreheyling, Priest Bishops Castle 4 10 0 Weston, Stockton and Rorrington Bucknell Bishops Castle 7 7 70 Chirbury Bishops Castle 0 0 30 Clun Bishops Castle 8 2 60 Hope, Bentlawnt, Hopesgate, Hemford, Shelve, Gravels (including Gravels Bank), Pentervin, Bromlow, Bishops Castle 7 21 0 Meadowtown and Lordstone Lydbury North Bishops Castle 0 1 19 Snailbeach, Stiperstones, Pennerley, Tankerville, Bishops Castle 5 17 0 Black Hole, Crows Nest and The Bog. Wentnor and Norbury Bishops Castle 6 2 0 Worthen, Brockton, Little Worthen, Little Brockton, Binweston, Leigh, Rowley, Aston Rogers and Aston Bishops Castle 8 13 0 Pigott. Acton Round, Aston Eyre, Monkhopton, Morville and Bridgnorth 16 18 0 Upton Cressett Ditton Priors Bridgnorth 6 23 0 Hopton Wafers and Doddington Cleobury Mortimer 8 5 0 Kinlet, Button Bridge, Button Oak Cleobury Mortimer 14 21 0 Neenton Cleobury Mortimer 8 0 0 Oreton, Farlow and Hill Houses Cleobury Mortimer 7 3 0 Silvington, Bromdon, Loughton and Wheathill Cleobury Mortimer 2 0 0 Stottesdon, Chorley and Bagginswood Cleobury Mortimer 5 3 0 Aston on Clun, Hopesay, Broome, Horderley, Craven Arms 4 22 0 Beambridge Long Meadow End, Rowton, Round Oak Bache Mill, Boulton, Broncroft, Corfton, Middlehope, Craven Arms 1 27 0 Peaton, Seifton, (Great/Little) Sutton, Westhope

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Stoke St Milborough, Hopton Cangeford, Cleestanton, Craven Arms 3 8 0 Cleedownton Cockshutt Ellesmere 31 17 6 Dudleston and Street Dinas Ellesmere 2 0 0 Dudleston Heath and Elson Ellesmere 17 6 29 Tetchill, Lee and Whitemere Ellesmere 10 14 0 Welsh Frankton, Perthy, New Marton and Lower Ellesmere 10 25 0 Frankton Welshampton and Lyneal Ellesmere 22A 12 0 Burford Ludlow 5 2 0 Clee Hill Ludlow 27 25 0 Onibury Ludlow 7 0 8 Adderley Market Drayton 26 6 0 Bletchley, Longford, Longslow & Moreton Say Market Drayton 3 36 0 Cheswardine Market Drayton 2 18 0 Childs Ercall Market Drayton 8 4 0 Hinstock Market Drayton 71 45 0 Hodnet Market Drayton 19 52 0 Marchamley, Peplow and Wollerton Market Drayton 5 4 0 Stoke Heath Market Drayton 0 69 15 Woore, Irelands Cross and Pipe Gate Market Drayton 80 29 0 Buildwas Much Wenlock 2 14 0 Gobowen Oswestry 72B 134 117 Kinnerley, Maesbrook, Dovaston and Knockin Heath Oswestry 43 41 9 Knockin Oswestry 1 25 0 Llanyblodwel, Porthywaen, Dolgoch, Llynclys and Bryn Oswestry 2 4 0 Melyn Llanymynech and Pant Oswestry 49C 26 32 Park Hall, Hindford, Babbinswood and Lower Frankton Oswestry 34 76 0 Ruyton XI Towns Oswestry 17 18 0

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Selattyn, Upper, Middle & Lower Hengoed and Pant Oswestry 1 39 0 Glas St Martins Oswestry 167 101 0 Weston Rhyn, Rhoswiel, Wern and Chirk Bank Oswestry 33 118 0 Whittington Oswestry 30 6 86 Albrighton Shrewsbury 0 0 0 Baschurch Shrewsbury 181 130 0 Bayston Hill Shrewsbury 59 12 0 Bicton and Four Crosses Shrewsbury 4 3 0 Bomere Heath Shrewsbury 33 43 0 Condover, Dorrington, Stapleton Shrewsbury 58 49 30 Fitz, Grafton and Newbanks Shrewsbury 3 7 0 Great Ness, Little Ness, Wilcott, Hopton/Valeswood, Shrewsbury 26 43 0 Kinton and Felton Butler Hanwood and Hanwood Bank Shrewsbury 46 31 0 Longden, Hook-a-gate, Annscroft, Longden Common Shrewsbury 31 33 0 and Lower Common/Exfords Green Montford Bridge West Shrewsbury 24 5 0 Mytton Shrewsbury 3 15 0 Nesscliffe Shrewsbury 10 91 0 Uffington Shrewsbury 11 3 0 Walford Heath Shrewsbury 8 9 0 Weston Lullingfields, Weston Wharf and Weston Shrewsbury 8 13 0 Common Myddle and Harmer Hill Wem 54 10 0 Shawbury Wem 61 23 0 Prees and Prees Higher Heath Whitchurch 35D 76D 62 Tilstock, Ash Magna/Ash Parva, Prees Heath, Ightfield Whitchurch 48 89 5 and Calverhall Total 1,619 1,920 517

*The completions in each of the community hubs and clusters include exception development which contributes to the housing requirement for the community hub or cluster. A11 completions as at 31st March 2019 have been excluded to offset the exclusion of 11 commitments when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) BThe 116 dwellings outstanding (as at 2013) on Planning Permission OS/05/13887/REM (Almond Avenue, Gobowen) were excluded from consideration when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement. All dwellings are now completed however the total number of units completed across the development increased to 126. {Planning Permission OS/05/13887/REM and 14/00568/FUL (Almond Avenue, Gobowen) therefore 126 dwellings removed from figures, as the site was excluded from consideration when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement}. C42 completions as at the 31st March 2019 have been excluded to offset the exclusion of 42 commitments when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement. DThe 115 dwellings outstanding (as at 2013) on Planning Permission 15/05307/REM (Gro Continental Site, Prees) (Outline Consent 09/00111/OUT) were excluded from consideration when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement. {6 completions and 109 commitments on Planning Permission 15/05307/REM (Gro Continental Site, Prees) (Outline Consent 09/00111/OUT) removed, as excluded from consideration when identifying the SAMDev Housing Requirement}. Please Note: The figures provided are net.

Table 15: Housing Commitments and Completions in the Rural Area Completions Planning Permissions (2006/07 – 2018/19) (as at the 31st March 2019) Wider Rural Area 3,796 1,345

*The completions in the rural area exclude exception development which contributes to the housing requirement of market towns; or community hubs or clusters. **The completions in the rural area includes completions which occurred in hubs and clusters prior to the identification of housing guidelines for these areas, as these have not been counted towards the achievement of the identified housing guidelines. *** The commitments and completions include those dwellings excluded from community hub or cluster settlements guidelines. Please Note: The figures provided are net.

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019)

Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement Appendices

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix A. Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 10/03008/FUL Land Off Station Road, Albrighton, WV7 3DS 08/09/2010 9 0 9 9 0 0 11/01080/FUL Former Barclays Bank, 14 Station Road, Albrighton 30/11/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 Lea Manor, Holyhead Road, Albrighton , 13/03521/FUL 19/02/2015 7 0 7 7 0 0 Wolverhampton, WV7 3BX Vacant Units , Station Road, Albrighton, 14/03279/FUL 03/11/2015 5 2 3 3 0 0 Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV7 3QH Little Meeson, Shaw Lane, Albrighton, 14/03419/FUL 13/07/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV7 3DS Development Land East Of Garridge Close , 14/03657/OUT 28/07/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Albrighton, Shropshire 14/05456/REM Land East Of Shaw Lane, Albrighton 05/06/2015 56 0 56 6 25 25 56 0 0 Development Land East Of Shaw Lane Off 15/02448/FUL 16/04/2018 65 0 65 25 25 50 15 15 0 Kingswood Road, Albrighton, Shropshire 15/02869/FUL 78 High Street , Albrighton, Shropshire, WV7 3JA 25/05/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Woodthorne, Beckbury, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 15/03528/FUL 19/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 9DG Millfields Farm, High House Lane, Albrighton, WV7 16/02725/FUL 26/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 3JL Tong House, Newport Road, Tong Village, Shifnal, 16/04285/FUL 14/12/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 TF11 8PW Proposed Dwelling North Of 11 Grange Road, 16/05584/FUL 17/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Albrighton, Shropshire Barn To The East Of Old Worcester Road, 17/01012/FUL 25/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Albrighton, Shropshire Former Mckeand Smith And Co Ltd, Station Road, 17/02469/FUL 13/09/2018 8 0 8 8 0 0 Albrighton, Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV7 3EA Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/06131/FUL South Of Bowling Green Lane, Albrighton, 23/04/2018 13 0 13 13 0 0 Shropshire Whiteladies Farm, Shackerley Lane, Cosford, 18/00106/FUL 03/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Albrighton, Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV8 1QZ

18/05485/FUL 87 High Street, Albrighton, Shropshire, WV7 3JT 01/03/2019 3 0 3 3 0 0

Humphreston Hall, Blue House Lane, Albrighton, BR/APP/FUL/02/0047 18/03/2002 7 0 7 7 0 0 Wolverhampton 10/01190/FUL Land At Bank Farm, Marton, Welshpool 19/05/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/02043/FUL Land Adj. Holly Cottage, Worthen, Shrewsbury 06/05/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/03790/FUL Gravels Farm, Gravelsbank, Shrewsbury 02/02/2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jacks Croft, 1 Binweston Lane, Worthen, 10/05112/FUL 21/03/2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury 11/00227/FUL Clunton Mill, Clunton, Craven Arms 24/03/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 11/01985/FUL Land Adj. Chestnut Cove, Bucknell 23/05/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land At 34-36 High Street And Sumach, Station 11/02298/FUL 23/12/2011 12 6 6 6 0 0 Street Bishops Castle 11/02491/FUL Hall Farm Barns, Norbury, Bishops Castle 30/01/2012 3 2 1 1 0 0 Upper House Farm, Hopton Castle, Craven Arms, 11/03098/FUL 26/03/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 0QF 11/04836/FUL The Firs Farm, Norbury, Bishops Castle 29/11/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 11/05208/FUL New House Farm, Newcastle, Craven Arms 09/08/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Old National Boys School, Station Street, Bishops 12/04500/FUL 25/01/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Castle 12/05180/FUL 9-11 Colebatch, Bishops Castle 01/03/2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Development Land West Of Mill Green, 13/01854/OUT 27/01/2015 26 0 26 26 0 0 Knighton , Powys 13/03245/FUL Betton Farm, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, SY5 0DU 15/06/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0

A1 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Cresswell Farm, Bedstone, Craven Arms , 13/03455/FUL 02/12/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 0BE 13/03915/FUL Church Farm Barns, More, Bishops Castle, SY9 5HH 12/11/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Colstey Farm, Colstey Bank, Clun, Craven Arms, 13/04764/FUL 20/06/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8NP Skelton Bank Farm, Mardu, Craven Arms , 14/00405/FUL 18/05/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8NH Chirbury C Of E (Voluntary Controlled) Primary 14/01513/FUL 07/07/2014 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 School Chirbury, Montgomery, SY15 6BN 14/03516/FUL Little Nest, Snailbeach, Shrewsbury, SY5 0LU 27/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Garage House, 1 Garage Mews, Station Street, 14/03834/REM 21/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bishops Castle, Shropshire, SY9 5AQ Walton Hall Farm, Worthen, Shrewsbury, 14/05531/FUL 04/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 9JN Proposed Workshop At Leat Wood, The Bog, 15/01470/FUL 03/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At Upper Vessons Farm, 15/01520/OUT 18/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Habberley, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of White 15/01990/OUT 23/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 House, Binweston Lane, Binweston, Shropshire Nessmynydd, Priest Weston, Montgomery, 15/02546/OUT 13/07/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY15 6DE Proposed Dwelling South Of Woodmine Cottage, 15/03864/FUL 11/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Gravels, Minsterley, Shropshire Farm Buildings South Of White House, Binweston 15/05524/FUL 23/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Lane, Binweston , Shropshire Seiffen Barns, Marton, Welshpool, Shropshire, 16/00797/FUL 20/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY21 8JY Land NE Of Pentreheyling House, Pentreheyling, 16/01213/FUL 14/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire The Old Barn, Newcastle, Craven Arms, Shropshire, 16/01449/FUL 05/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 8QL Proposed Dwelling South Of Prospect House, 16/02505/FUL 30/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Snailbeach, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At Oakage Riding School , Hope, 16/02796/FUL 23/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Farm Building At Upper Overs, Ratlinghope, 16/03190/FUL 04/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Adj Bird Farm , 16/03690/OUT 28/10/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Worthen , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of 32 Snailbeach, 16/03876/FUL 06/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land NE Of 16/04542/FUL 30/11/2016 2 1 1 1 0 0 Worthen Hall , Worthen , Shropshire Snailbeach Farm, Snailbeach, Shrewsbury, 16/04729/FUL 10/01/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0LW Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 16/04879/OUT 16/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Fairview , Gravels Bank, Minsterley, Shropshire Criggin Stable, Llanfair Waterdine, Knighton, 16/04974/FUL 02/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, LD7 1TU Proposed Dwelling South East Of Rayvale, 16/05004/FUL 15/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Snailbeach, Shropshire Bentlawnt Post Office And Stores, 12 - 13 16/05174/COU 09/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bentlawnt, Minsterley, Shropshire, SY5 0ES Proposed Barn Conversions At Bromlow Hall Farm , 16/05862/FUL 10/04/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Bromlow, Minsterley, Shropshire 17/00643/FUL 24 Welsh Street, Bishops Castle, SY9 5BT 22/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

A2 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling West Of 13 Bankshead , 17/00977/FUL 26/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 17/01288/FUL Disused Malt House , Bucknell , Shropshire 12/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 17/01360/REM The Sidings, Snailbeach, Shrewsbury, SY5 0LT 02/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ashlea Pools Country Park, Hoptonheath, Craven 17/01744/FUL 29/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Arms, Shropshire, SY7 0QD 17/01782/FUL Lower Lye Farm , Bucknell, Shropshire, SY7 0BN 27/06/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lyndhurst , Harley Jenkins Street, Bishops Castle, 17/01886/FUL 06/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY9 5AH Lower Darnford, Darnford , Shrewsbury, 17/02371/FUL 21/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0SR Proposed Affordable Dwelling NE Of Lower Weston 17/02528/FUL 21/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Clun, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The West Of Bank Cottage, 17/02882/FUL 19/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Norbury, Shropshire Kempton Farm, 1 Kempton, Lydbury North, 17/03054/FUL 17/07/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 0JG Nant Isa, Pennerley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 17/03131/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 0NE 17/03194/FUL Conversion Of Stone Barn, Wentnor, Shropshire 12/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

Barn North Of Oakeley Farm, Bishops Castle, 17/03199/FUL 04/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Development Land South Of Woodbatch 17/03497/REM 07/12/2017 9 0 9 9 0 0 Road, Bishops Castle, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development West Of 17/03541/OUT Clungunford Farm, Church Road, Clungunford, 31/08/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire Barns At Clungunford Farm, Church Road , 17/03542/FUL 05/12/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Clungunford, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling, Field North Of 17/03644/FUL 17/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lower Farm, Medlicott, Bishops Castle, Shropshire

Proposed Barn Conversion West Of The Stables 17/03648/FUL Inn, Drury Lane, Hopesgate, Shropshire 19/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

17/03752/REM 17/03753/REM 17/02935/REM 17/03754/REM 17/03785/REM Proposed Residential Development West Of 10/06/2015 9 0 9 9 0 0 17/03755/REM Lavender Bank, Bishops Castle, Shropshire 17/03756/REM 17/03757/REM 17/03758/REM 18/02377/REM Proposed Dwelling North Of Upper Stockton Farm, 17/03841/OUT 06/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stockton, Marton , Shropshire Proposed Residential Development South West Of 17/03956/REM 17/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Longhope, Gravels Bank, Minsterley, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Fenwick House, 17/04173/FUL 01/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Worthen, Shropshire 17/04233/REM Development Land South West Of Longhope, 23/11/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 17/03956/REM Gravels Bank, Minsterley, Shropshire 17/11/2017

A3 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling, North East Of Pool View, 17/04532/REM Shelve, Shropshire 27/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Union Street, 17/04645/OUT 13/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bishops Castle, Shropshire The Cottage, Lydbury North, Bishops Castle, 17/04783/FUL 09/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY9 5ET Bower Cottage, Asterton, Bishops Castle, 17/04895/FUL 27/09/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY9 5EJ Quarry Lodge, Norbury, Bishops Castle, Shropshire, 17/04901/FUL 22/12/2017 2 1 1 1 0 0 SY9 5EA Barn Conversion At Pen Y Wern, Black Hill, 17/04989/FUL 14/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Clunton, Craven Arms, Shropshire, SY7 0JD Proposed Dwelling South Of Cedric House , Crows 17/05226/FUL 06/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Nest, Snailbeach, Shropshire North Office Building At Ransford Sawmills, Station 17/05405/FUL 05/02/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Street, Bishops Castle, Shropshire , SY9 5AQ 3 Bwlch Cottages , Clun , Craven Arms, Shropshire, 17/05471/FUL 27/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 8LU Proposed Dwelling North Of Nessmynydd, Priest 17/05908/FUL 27/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Weston , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Doukel, Bucknell, 17/05987/FUL 18/05/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire Clungunford Farm Barn, Church Road, 17/06163/OUT 06/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Clungunford, Craven Arms, Shropshire, SY7 0PN The Perrys, Marton , Welshpool , Shropshire, SY21 18/00226/FUL 26/03/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 8JY Land North Of Mistletoe Cottage, Stiperstones, 18/00384/REM 27/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0LU Upper Duffryn, Duffryn, Craven Arms, Shropshire, 18/00479/FUL 13/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 8PQ Land Adj Greenlands, Chirbury, Montgomery, 18/00497/OUT 17/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY15 6BH Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/00680/OUT North Of Bowling Green Close, Bishops Castle, 30/08/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Pennerley, 18/00924/OUT 03/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 18/01070/REM 16/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Fairview , Gravels Bank, Minsterley, Shropshire Land Adjacent 16 Aston Rogers, Aston Rogers, 18/01206/REM 27/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Westbury, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions Adjacent Weston 18/01321/FUL 25/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 House, Binweston Lane, Binweston, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Marton, 18/01453/FUL 30/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Lower Spoad, Clun, Newcastle On Clun, Shropshire , 18/01501/REM 10/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 8PB Proposed New Dwelling At Little Nest, Crows Nest, 18/01516/FUL 13/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Snailbeach, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of Hawthorn Cottage, 4 18/01569/OUT 19/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Beambridge, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of 7 Chapel Road, 18/01584/FUL 30/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Broome Road, Clungunford, Shropshire 18/01691/FUL Barn At Bryn Farm, Bryn, Shropshire 31/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Woodbine Cottage, Worthen, Shrewsbury, 18/01733/FUL 02/07/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 9HY

A4 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development At Crowsnest, 18/01964/REM 22/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stiperstones, Shropshire 18/02346/FUL The Old Yard, Powells Lane, Clun, SY7 8LA 06/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling West Of 10 To 11, Lydbury 18/02560/FUL 31/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 North, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South East Of The Wyches, 18/02586/OUT 18/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Little Worthen, Worthen, Shropshire Ashgrove, Purlogue, Clun, Craven Arms, 18/02889/FUL 17/12/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8LX 1 Monday Town, Westbury, Shrewsbury, 18/02962/FUL 31/10/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 9HG Land To The South East Of Hemford Bromlow, 18/03312/OUT 18/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shropshire 18/03335/FUL 14 The Square, Clun, SY7 8JA 24/09/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling To The North Of Shelve, 18/03484/OUT 05/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Besford Farm, Wentnor, Bishops Castle, 18/03616/FUL 08/01/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY9 5EF Proposed Dwelling West Of Old Farm, Bucknell, 18/04021/FUL 13/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land NW Of 18/04138/OUT 20/02/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 2Gravels BankMinsterley Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South East Of The WychesLittle 18/04394/OUT 01/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Worthen Worthen Shropshire Development Site To The West Of Oak Meadow, 18/04411/FUL 14/02/2019 24 0 24 24 0 0 Bishops Castle, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land At 18/04480/REM 20/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hemford, Bromlow, Minsterley, Shropshire Proposed Rural Building Conversion At Village 18/04490/FUL 25/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Bromlow, Minsterley, Shropshire Storage Unit To The South Of Salop Street, Bishops 18/04520/FUL 11/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Castle, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of Nessmynydd, Priest 18/04633/OUT 14/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Weston, Shropshire Horderley Farm, Horderley, Craven Arms, 18/04686/FUL 16/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8HP Stone Cottage, Stone House Farm, Pentirvin, 18/04764/COU 10/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 0EZ The Old Post Office, Gravels, Minsterley, 18/04767/FUL 19/12/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 0JD Proposed Dwelling East Of Hopton Heath Farm, 18/04825/FUL 19/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hopton Castle, Shropshire Fairfield, Castle Street, Clun, Craven Arms, 18/05165/FUL 19/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8JU Cranberry Cottage, Shelve, Shrewsbury, 18/05553/FUL 08/03/2019 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0JF Proposed Dwelling East Of 8 The Lyde, Bromlow, 18/05776/OUT 06/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shropshire Caravan Adjacent Old School House, Shelve, 19/00421/FUL 18/03/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minsterley, Shropshire, SY5 0JQ Proposed Dutch Barn Conversion North Of Oakeley 19/00425/FUL 22/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Bishops Castle, Shropshire SS/1/03/14360/F Hope Farm, Drury Lane, Minsterley, Shrewsbury 29/05/2003 1 0 1 1 0 0

SS/1/03/14838/F Adj To Four Winds, Llwyn Road, Clun, Craven Arms 07/10/2003 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adjacent The Anchor, The Anchor, Newcastle, SS/1/07/20009/F 06/01/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Craven Arms SS/1/08/20641/F Hope Valley, Shrewsbury 16/02/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 SS/1/09/21497/F 34 High Street, Bishops Castle 19/03/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0

A5 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding SS/1/09/21499/F Colstey, Colstey Bank, Craven Arms 19/03/2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 09/03278/FUL Barn 1 Churchyard Farm, Neenton, Bridgnorth 08/02/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/01495/FUL Rhodes Farm, Nordley, Bridgnorth 08/06/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/05398/FUL Sytch House Farm, Claverley, Wolverhampton 11/04/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 11/04362/FUL Severna, Love Lane, Bridgnorth 03/04/2013 4 0 4 4 0 0 13 Cann Hall Drive, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV15 11/04387/FUL 20/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 5BG 11/04482/FUL Upper Hollicott Farm, The Down, Bridgnorth 21/12/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Harpswood Farm, Ludlow Road, Harpswood, 11/04484/FUL 15/03/2013 4 0 4 4 0 0 Bridgnorth 11/04623/FUL Upper Holllicott, The Down, Bridgnorth 04/04/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 12/00771/FUL Fairfield, Acton Round, Bridgnorth 05/09/2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 Disused Windmill , Hillside, Ditton Priors, 12/02797/FUL 16/05/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Sydnall Farm, Middleton Priors, Bridgnorth , WV16 13/03165/FUL 29/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 6UN Stanlow Farm, Stanlow , Bridgnorth, Shropshire , 13/04743/FUL 22/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 WV6 7DY Stanlow Farm, Stanlow, Bridgnorth, 13/05123/VAR 22/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton , Shropshire, WV6 7DY Davro Iron & Steel Co Ltd, Ridgewell Works, 14/00030/OUT Stourbridge Road, Wootton, Bridgnorth, WV15 18/07/2016 16 0 16 16 0 0 6ED Proposed Affordable Dwelling At Hillside , Ditton 14/02771/FUL 01/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Priors, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Land Between Severn Brow And 14/03239/FUL Fairfield, Oldbury Grove Lane, Oldbury, Bridgnorth , 14/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Eversley, Oldbury 14/03360/FUL 07/05/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Field Cottage, 20 Underhill Street, Bridgnorth , 14/03771/OUT 24/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 4BB Brookfield, Daddlebrook Road, Alveley , Bridgnorth , 14/03888/FUL 18/05/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, WV15 6PT Land To The Rear Of Acton Arms Hotel, Morville, 15/00304/FUL 10/04/2017 6 0 6 6 0 0 Bridgnorth , Shropshire, WV16 4RJ Proposed Residential Development Rear Of 2 15/00829/OUT 23/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Kidderminster Road, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Barn Conversion At Hall Close Farm , Alveley, 15/01033/FUL 02/03/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Swancote Country Club, Swancote , Bridgnorth, 15/01538/FUL 15/06/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 WV15 5HA Former Filling Station, Quatford, Bridgnorth, 15/01747/FUL 15/03/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire , WV15 6QJ Home Farm Barns , Brown Clee Road, Middleton 15/02147/FUL 18/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Priors, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6UR Woodbine Cottage, Old Mill Lane, Oldbury , 15/02270/FUL 07/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth , WV16 5EQ Oaklands, Station Road, Ditton Priors, Bridgnorth , 15/02921/REM 11/01/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 WV16 6SU Proposed Dwelling South Of Millfields Way, Eudon 15/03433/FUL 20/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 George, Bridgnorth , Shropshire Land South East Of Bradney Lodge, Worfield, 15/03551/FUL 13/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The West Of Bramble Ridge, 15/03757/FUL 14/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The West Of 15/05277/FUL 16/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Friars Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire

A6 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Barn Conversion At Draycott Farm, Draycott, 16/00330/FUL 03/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Claverley, Shropshire Plot Adjacent 10 The Paddock, Claverley, 16/00469/REM 25/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton , Shropshire, WV5 7DW Proposed Affordable Dwelling To The South Of 16/00757/FUL 20/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Station Road, Ditton Priors , Shropshire Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling At Breeze 16/00971/FUL 09/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Hilton, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Off Goodwood Avenue, 16/01010/FUL 22/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development To The South 16/01511/REM 13/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Of Church Lane, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Dairy House , Ludstone, Claverley, Wolverhampton, 16/01693/FUL 08/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, WV5 7DE The Wyches, Chantry Lane, Quatford , Bridgnorth, 16/01804/FUL 01/09/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, WV15 6QJ Proposed Residential Development At Former 16/01978/FUL Substation, Village Road, Norton, Shifnal, 10/01/2019 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion At Dairy Farm, Cross 16/02158/FUL 07/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane Head, Bridgnorth, Shropshire The Coach House, Cleobury North, Bridgnorth, 16/03176/FUL 13/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 6RW Barn Adjacent Home Farm Barns, Brown Clee 16/03487/FUL Road, Middleton Priors, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 08/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 WV16 6UR Proposed Barn Conversions At Bradeney Farm, 16/03572/FUL 01/12/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Worfield, Shropshire Weston House, Weston, Much Wenlock, 16/04806/FUL 12/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6QT Proposed Dwelling Adjacent 12 Kidderminster 16/05137/REM 24/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Bridgnorth , Shropshire Dudmaston Stud, Tuckhill, Six Ashes, Bridgnorth, 16/05142/OUT 29/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, WV15 6EW Proposed Dwelling South Of 1 Uplands Drive, 16/05256/FUL 20/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Former Agricultural Barn At Allscott Farm, Allscott, 16/05303/FUL 10/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Of Thornton 16/05668/FUL 30/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm , Ludlow Road , Bridgnorth, Shropshire The Old House, Hilton , Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 17/00012/FUL 12/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 WV15 5PJ Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 17/00015/OUT 10/10/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 9 Oldbury Wells, Bridgnorth , Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 17/00210/FUL 09/02/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Salop Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire

Proposed Development Land To The East Of Old 17/00273/FUL 28/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Mill Lane, Oldbury, Bridgnorth, Shropshire

Proposed Development Land To The East Of Old 17/00275/FUL 28/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Mill Lane, Oldbury, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of Little Acre, Station 17/00285/FUL 12/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Ditton Priors, Shropshire 44 - 45 High Street And 99 Cartway, Bridgnorth, 17/00521/FUL 20/04/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 4DX 17/00682/FUL Haven Lodge, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 9NR 13/04/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0

A7 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding The Barns, Church Lane, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 17/00834/REM 23/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 WV16 4NW 46 - 47 Whitburn Street , Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 17/00870/FUL 31/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 WV16 4QT Proposed Dwelling, Brook House, Heathton , 17/01619/FUL 29/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Claverley, Shropshire, WV5 7AU Meadowvale Nursing Home, Monkhopton, 17/01670/FUL 19/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6SA Proposed Dwelling, Adj 32 Ludlow Road, Ludlow 17/02184/OUT 04/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Bridgnorth, Shropshire 17/02672/FUL 42 River Side, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 4BH 12/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0

Proposed Affordable Dwelling NW Of High House 17/02756/FUL 18/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Fenn Green, Alveley, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling At Woundale, 17/02852/FUL 09/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire 17/03268/FUL Glenacre Mill Lane, Kemberton , Shifnal , TF11 9LT 02/11/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quatford Nurseries , Chantry Lane, Quatford, 17/03443/FUL 07/11/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV15 6QJ Monkhall , Monkhopton, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 17/03877/FUL 01/03/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 WV16 6XF 17/03879/FUL The Kings Arms Inn, Bull Ring, Claverley, WV5 7DT 25/10/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Proposed Barn Conversion At Coates Farm, 17/04041/FUL 13/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Middleton Scriven, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of 10 Love Lane , 17/05903/FUL 01/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire 17/06146/FUL Gatacre Hall, Gatacre, Claverley, WV5 7AW 03/04/2018 7 0 7 7 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of 30 Ludlow Heights, 17/06172/FUL 01/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire 9, 10, 11 Lower Forge Cottages, Eardington, 18/00143/FUL 13/03/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Bridgnorth , Shropshire, WV16 5LQ Old Bakery, Bank Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 18/00195/FUL 02/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 WV16 4BP Proposed Residential Development, Land North Of 18/00196/FUL 04/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 8 Salop Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Birchley Farm, Pattingham, Wolverhampton, 18/00288/FUL 20/04/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire, WV6 7DZ 18/00416/COU 8 Bernards Hill , Bridgnorth , Shropshire, WV15 5AX 28/03/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0

18/00460/FUL Barns Adjacent Allum Bridge, Alveley , Shropshire 09/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 23 St Marys Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 18/00491/FUL 17/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 4DW Proposed Barn Conversion At Upton Park Farm, 18/00727/FUL Beaconhill Lane, Monkhopton, Bridgnorth, 28/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development, Former 18/01358/FUL Central Garage, Kidderminster Road, Alveley, 21/03/2019 24 0 24 24 0 0 Shropshire, WV15 6LL Red Hill Poultry Farm, Spoonley Gate, Pattingham, 18/01702/FUL 12/06/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Wolverhampton, WV6 7ED Field Cottage, 20 Underhill Street, Bridgnorth , 18/01768/REM 19/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 4BB Strathallan, 11 Westgate Drive, Bridgnorth, 18/02518/FUL 01/08/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 4QF Redundant Stables At Monkhopton Estate, 18/03216/FUL 30/11/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Monkhopton, Bridgnorth, Shropshire

A8 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Residential Development Land To The South Of 18/03830/REM 19/12/2018 16 0 16 16 0 0 Station Road, Ditton Priors, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling At Fenn Green, 18/03970/FUL 07/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Alveley, Shropshire

16 - 20 High Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 18/04128/FUL 30/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 4DB

18/04279/FUL 79 High Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 4DS 15/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 The Cottage, Nordley, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 18/04281/FUL 20/11/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 WV16 4SX 18/05511/REM Manor Farm, Monkhopton, Bridgnorth, WV16 6SB 18/03/2019 9 0 9 9 0 0 The Willows Residential Home, 50 Mill Street, 18/05621/FUL 24/01/2019 -2 0 -2 -2 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV15 5AG Sweyney Cliff House, Coalport, Telford, Shropshire, 18/05861/FUL 29/03/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 TF8 7JD BR/96/0629 Hook Farm, Bridgnorth 01/01/1997 4 1 3 3 0 0 Adj The Hollies, Griffiths Green, Claverley, BR/APP/FUL/06/0247 22/06/2006 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton BR/APP/FUL/07/0493 Adj To Stable Cottage, Cliff Road, Bridgnorth 26/07/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0

BR/APP/FUL/08/0637 Great Oxenbold Farm, Brockton, Much Wenlock 08/06/2009 3 0 3 3 0 0 BR/APP/RES/02/0115 Post Office Lane, Burwarton, Bridgnorth 28/03/2002 5 0 5 5 0 0 14/01125/OUT Land Off Park View, Broseley, Shropshire 18/02/2016 6 0 6 6 0 0 Benthall Grange, Benthall Lane, Benthall, Broseley, 14/02614/FUL 22/10/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 TF12 5RR Proposed Development Land To The East Of 14/04019/OUT 31/08/2016 12 0 12 12 0 0 Avenue Road, Broseley, Shropshire 14/04219/FUL Land Adj 29 Sycamore Road , Broseley, Shropshire 23/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Development Land Off Calcutts Road, Jackfield, 14/04740/FUL 15/12/2017 9 0 9 9 0 0 Shropshire Rosewood Pet Products Ltd , 45 Coalport Road, 14/04891/OUT 08/09/2015 20 0 20 20 0 0 Broseley, Shropshire , TF12 5AN Proposed Development Land At Hockley Bank, Park 14/05409/FUL 27/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 View, Broseley, Shropshire 15/01037/FUL 23 High Street, Broseley, Shropshire , TF12 5EZ 23/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 16/00472/FUL Land Off Fox Lane, Broseley, Shropshire 25/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Former Pumping Station, Speed's Lane , Broseley, 16/01406/FUL 31/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land Adjacent, 16/02036/FUL 24/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 The Woodlands, Jackfield, Shropshire Development Site Adjacent Stone Lee 16/04774/FUL 15/03/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Calcutts Road, Jackfield, Shropshire, TF8 7LG Posenhall Reservoir, Posenhall, Broseley, 16/05208/FUL 20/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 17/01239/FUL Site at 29 Sycamore Road, Broseley, Shropshire 25/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Gestiana , Woodlands Road, Broseley, Shropshire, 17/01834/FUL 23/05/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 TF12 5PU Unit 7 Instones Building, The Square, Broseley, 17/05714/FUL 06/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF12 5EW Former Lloyds Bank Plc, 19 High Street, Broseley, 18/00188/FUL 01/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF12 5HZ Proposed Dwelling East Of Shalimar, Fox Lane, 18/00343/FUL 25/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Broseley, Shropshire

A9 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling West Of 17, Delph Side, 18/01461/FUL 30/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Broseley, Shropshire 18/01751/FUL 26-27 High Street, Broseley, Shropshire, TF12 5EZ 25/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0

18/01858/FUL 8-9 King Street, Broseley, Shropshire, TF12 5PN 13/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0

18/02531/FUL 83-84 High Street, Broseley, Shropshire, TF12 5ET 07/08/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 27 Cherrybrook Drive, Broseley, Shropshire, TF12 18/04595/FUL 21/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 5SQ 10/00652/FUL Coppice House, Longnor, Shrewsbury 03/11/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/03321/FUL Upper Farm, Marshbrook, Church Stretton 21/12/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/03469/FUL Frodesley Lane Farm, Acton Burnell, Shrewsbury 05/01/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/05562/FUL Woolstaston Hall, Woolstaston, Shrewsbury 07/04/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 11/00413/FUL Top Farm, Leebotwood, Church Stretton 08/04/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 12/01801/REM Adj To Greystones, Longnor, Shrewsbury 23/10/2012 3 0 3 3 0 0 12/03394/REM Brambles, Clive Avenue, Church Stretton 29/10/2012 3 0 3 3 0 0 1 & 2 Gutter Farm, Hope Bowdler, Church Stretton, 13/03336/FUL 04/10/2013 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 7JA 23 High Street , Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 13/03514/FUL 14/06/2016 3 1 2 2 0 0 6BX Boystone Farm, Darby Lane, Wall Under Heywood, 14/00583/FUL 14/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 7DT Barn At Shootrough Farm , Cardington, Church 14/00724/FUL 12/05/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire 14/01205/FUL Denver House, Acton Burnell, Shrewsbury , SY5 7PQ 13/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Exception Site Dwelling, Batchcote, 14/02572/FUL 20/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Church Stretton, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development West Of Cwm 14/04973/FUL 08/09/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Gweld, Wall Under Heywood, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling South East Of 14/05004/FUL 08/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pitchford, Shropshire Ticklerton Hall, Ticklerton, Church Stretton, 15/00708/FUL 04/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 7DQ The Lynches, Smethcott, Church Stretton, 15/02274/FUL 01/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Oak Tree View, Church Preen, Church Stretton, 15/03512/FUL 07/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY6 7LH Proposed Dwelling South Of Cargan , All Stretton, 15/04383/FUL 13/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Outbuilding At Yew Tree Inn, All Stretton, 15/04755/FUL 13/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land At 15/05334/REM 29/04/2016 2 1 1 1 0 0 Hemford, Bromlow, Minsterley, Shropshire Land Adj. To Sayang House, Hope Bowdler, Church 16/00602/REM 15/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 7DD Land East Of Oakfield Farm, Leebotwood, Church 16/00815/FUL 06/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Of Rose 16/01773/FUL 23/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottage, Longville In The Dale, Shropshire Land South Of Chiddingstone, Hazler Road, Church 16/02184/OUT 25/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire The Leasowes , Sandford Avenue, Church Stretton, 16/02491/REM 17/01/2018 43 0 43 43 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 7AE 16/02690/FUL 34-36 Sandford Avenue, Church Stretton, SY6 6BH 30/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling NW Of Overdale, Clive Avenue, 16/03066/FUL 21/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Church Stretton, Shropshire

A10 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Former Cowshed, South Of Hamperley Farm, 16/03562/FUL 07/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hamperley, Shropshire Land Adjacent The Spinney, Plaish, Church 16/05320/FUL 28/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire Hall Farm, Picklescott, Shrewsbury, Church 16/05366/FUL 11/04/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6NR Plot 3 Proposed Residential Development, SW Of 17/00198/FUL Manor Farm Barns, Leebotwood , Church Stretton, 01/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire The Flat, 20 Sandford Avenue, Church Stretton, 17/00382/FUL 21/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 6BW Proposed Residential Development At Hill Cottage, 17/00798/FUL 02/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Clive Avenue, Church Stretton, SY6 7BL Housing Development Site , Brooksbury, Church 17/01200/FUL 25/09/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6AS Proposed Affordable Dwelling East Of Oakfield 17/01533/FUL 21/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm , Leebotwood, Church Stretton, Shropshire Longlea Farm, Longville In The Dale, Much 17/01564/REM 27/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6DS Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling At Harton 17/02022/REM 26/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm , Harton, Shropshire Ashlet House, 52 High Street, Church Stretton, 17/03185/FUL 19/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY6 6BX Broadmeadow Holistic Centre, The Broad 17/03304/FUL Meadow, Leebotwood, Church Stretton, 18/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 6NQ Holmwood, Clive Avenue, Church Stretton, 17/03840/FUL 28/01/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 7BL Land Adj Heath House, Leebotwood, Church 17/04907/FUL 14/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 7JP Affordable Dwelling Opposite Yules Bank, Soudley, 17/05225/FUL 20/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land At 100 Acres, Smethcott, Church Stretton, 18/00277/FUL 02/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion West Of Ludlow Road, 18/01092/FUL 17/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Little Stretton, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent The Levons, Hazler 18/01563/OUT 11/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion At Church Farm, 18/02012/FUL 02/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Rushbury, Shropshire, SY6 7EB Workshop Adjacent Crown House, Ludlow Road, 18/02185/FUL 31/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Little Stretton, SY6 6RF Proposed Barn Conversion NW Of Church Farm, 18/02340/FUL 19/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Rushbury, Shropshire 18/03631/FUL Garages Off Yeld Bank, Church Stretton, Shropshire 28/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Barn Conversion NE Of Chatwall Lawn, 18/03661/FUL 23/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Chatwall, Church Stretton, Shropshire 18/03865/REM Land NW Of Yew Tree Inn, All Stretton, Shropshire 26/10/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0

Swan House, Frodesley, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 18/05409/REM 06/03/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 7HA 18/05428/FUL Fell End, The Row, All Stretton, SY6 6JX 15/01/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Patch, 39A Shrewsbury Road, Church Stretton, 18/05492/FUL 12/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY6 6JD SA/08/0611/F Home Farm, Acton Burnell, Shrewsbury 07/02/2011 9 0 9 9 0 0 SA/08/0678/F Oaklands Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury 23/07/2008 2 0 2 2 0 0 SA/08/1295/F Court House Farm, Gretton, Church Stretton 11/12/2008 3 0 3 3 0 0 SA/09/0086/F Top Farm, Leebotwood, Shrewsbury 24/03/2009 2 1 1 1 0 0 SS/1/00/11518/F Manor Farm, Rushbury, Church Stretton 09/03/2001 3 2 1 1 0 0

A11 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land At Hall Farm, Longville In The Dale, Much SS/1/07/19587/F 18/07/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wenlock Land Adjacent The Blacksmiths, Chorley, 11/03985/FUL 31/10/2013 2 0 2 2 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Land At Rose Hill , Cleobury Mortimer , Shropshire, 12/00836/FUL 19/02/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 DY14 8JP Barnsland Farm, Tenbury Road, Cleobury 13/00731/FUL 29/01/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Mortimer, Shropshire, DY14 8QU The Down Farm, Farlow, Kidderminster, 13/03426/FUL 10/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 8TE Building North Of 5 Studley Lion Lane , Clee Hill, 13/03466/FUL 21/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Development Land West Of Water Works, Hopton 13/05064/FUL 25/02/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Wafers, Shropshire Residential Development Land Adjacent 14/01008/FUL 04/06/2015 3 2 1 1 0 0 Sunnyways, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire 14/03842/FUL Stanley Farm, Chorley, Bridgnorth, WV16 6PS 19/08/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0

14/03937/COU Stanley Farm, Chorley, Bridgnorth, WV16 6PS 19/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Agricultural Building Rear Of Beaulah Cottage, 15/00958/FUL Withies Bank, Oreton, Cleobury Mortimer, 06/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land To The Rear Of 41 Furlongs Road, Cleobury 15/01919/FUL 28/07/2016 12 0 12 12 0 0 Mortimer, Shropshire, DY14 8AR Proposed Dwelling Rear Of 4 Church Street, 15/01976/FUL 14/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cleobury Mortimer , Shropshire Land At Gibbons Well, Button Bridge Lane, 15/02133/FUL 07/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Buttonbridge, Kinlet, Shropshire Land Adjoining Rugpits, Cottages Clee Hill Road, 15/03370/FUL 03/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Burford, Shropshire, WR15 8HL Proposed Affordable Dwelling At 15/04831/FUL 01/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Sodom Farm, Sherbourne, Nash, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling To The North Of 16/00540/FUL 28/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 New Road, Oreton, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire The Chalet, Crumps Brook, Hopton Wafers, 16/01608/FUL 13/02/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kidderminster, Shropshire , DY14 0HT Proposed Exception Site Dwelling East Of Forgend, 16/04963/FUL 29/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Coreley, Shropshire, SY8 3AS Proposed Dwelling West Of The Crabmill, 16/05623/FUL 17/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Buttonoak, Kinlet, Shropshire 8 Crumps Brook, Hopton Wafers, Kidderminster, 17/00188/FUL 25/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 0EP Fastings Farm, Button Bridge Lane, Buttonbridge, 17/00613/FUL 30/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Kinlet, Bewdley, Shropshire, DY12 3DZ Proposed Residential Development Adjacent 7 17/00746/OUT Buttonbridge , Kinlet, Bewdley, Shropshire, DY12 28/07/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 3AN Proposed Dwelling To The East Of New House 17/01063/FUL 05/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Bagginswood, Stottesdon, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At Shutfields, Coreley, 17/01147/FUL 12/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling, Rear Of 24 High Street, Eagle 17/01309/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire Land Adjacent No. 4 , Fryers Close, Cleobury 17/01314/FUL 17/08/2017 2 1 1 1 0 0 Mortimer, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South East Of Penny Black, 17/02047/OUT 10/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Barkers Lane , Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire

A12 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 34 High Street , Cleobury Mortimer, Kidderminster, 17/02870/FUL 03/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 8DQ Development Land South Of Tenbury Road, 17/03058/REM 29/03/2018 22 0 22 22 0 0 Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Bagginswood, 17/03434/FUL 29/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stottesdon, Shropshire Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling At Upper 17/04277/REM 28/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bransley Farm, Bransley, Shropshire High Chaparral, Doddington, Hopton Wafers, 17/04799/FUL 05/01/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kidderminster, Shropshire, DY14 0NU Electra House, 18 High Street, Cleobury Mortimer, 17/04874/FUL 15/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 DY14 8DG Mawley Oak Garage, Cleobury Mortimer , 17/05031/FUL 10/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Kidderminster, Shropshire, DY14 8PR Proposed Dwelling, East Of Doddington , 17/05144/FUL 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/05796/FUL 08/11/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 North Of Station Road, Stottesdon, Shropshire Development Land South Of Little Stocks Close, 17/06014/REM 17/05/2018 15 0 15 15 0 0 Kinlet , Shropshire Farm Office, Withypool Farm, Hollywaste, 17/06090/FUL 27/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 0DB Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Oreton Cottage, 17/06164/FUL 22/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oreton, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire Conversion Of Barn To Residential Use, Chorley, 18/00318/FUL 21/03/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Land Adjacent Santa Fe, Button Bridge Lane, 18/01253/FUL Buttonbridge, Kinlet, Bewdley, Shropshire, DY12 06/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 3DQ Outbuilding South West Of Sweveneys, Sturt Lane, 18/01429/FUL 30/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Kinlet, Shropshire Land East Of The Woodlands Farm, Cleeton Lane, 18/01800/FUL 17/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cleeton St Mary, Shropshire, DY14 0QU 2 Church Street, Cleobury Mortimer, 18/02803/FUL 07/11/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Kidderminster, Shropshire, DY14 8BS Proposed Dwelling, Land Off Earls Ditton Lane, 18/03934/OUT 01/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Doddington, Shropshire Malthouse Farm, Bromdon, Bridgnorth, 18/05296/FUL 10/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 6QT Proposed Barn Conversion West Of Malt House 18/05299/FUL 24/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Wheathill, Shropshire Marsh Down Farm, Earls Ditton, Kidderminster, 18/05588/FUL 06/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 0NN Proposed Housing Development Adj Meadowside 18/05677/FUL Paddock, Hill Houses, Farlow, Kidderminster, 20/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions At Earls Ditton Farm, 18/05835/FUL 22/02/2019 5 0 5 5 0 0 Earls Ditton, Shropshire Coombe Farm, Bagginswood, Stottesdon, BR/APP/FUL/01/0210 10/05/2001 3 2 1 1 0 0 Kidderminster SS1991/01586 Lower Downs Farm, Hopton Wafers 01/09/1991 2 1 1 1 0 0 11/03349/FUL Upper House Farm, Abdon, Craven Arms 14/12/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 Land At Hillend Farm , Westhope, Craven Arms, 12/03881/FUL 23/01/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Harry Tuffins Supermarket, Shrewsbury Road, 12/04878/FUL 31/01/2013 13 0 13 13 0 0 Craven Arms Proposed Affordable Dwelling At Lower Bush, 13/03224/FUL 31/01/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stoke St Milborough, Shropshire Evans And Stubbs Building , Dale Street, Craven 13/03415/FUL 03/08/2015 7 0 7 7 0 0 Arms, Shropshire, SY7 9NY

A13 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 14/02132/FUL Upper House Farm, Abdon, Craven Arms, SY7 9HZ 14/08/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0

14/02697/OUT Kevindale, Aston-On-Clun, Craven Arms, SY7 0NT 25/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling North Of Belair, Berrymill, 15/00359/FUL 09/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Craven Arms, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling, SSW Of Morwood 15/03181/FUL 17/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Lower Dinchope, Shropshire

15/03350/FUL Wormsley Barn, Hopton Cangeford, Shropshire 21/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm Buildings South East Of Manor House Farm, 15/05096/FUL 08/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Abdon, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling SW Of Pinstones Farm, Corfton, 15/05099/REM 15/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 15/05222/FUL Wyndale, Aston-On-Clun, Craven Arms, SY7 8ET 12/04/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of The Larches, 15/05469/REM 04/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Berrymill, Craven Arms, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Rose Cottages, Clun 16/00142/FUL 07/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Aston On Clun, Shropshire Keepers Cottage , 154 Stokesay, Craven Arms, 16/00804/FUL 15/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 9AN Temperance Hall Hotel, 19 Shrewsbury Road , 16/01169/REM 13/12/2016 27 0 27 27 0 0 Craven Arms, Shropshire, SY7 9PY Proposed Affordable Dwelling NE Of Meadow 16/01481/FUL 20/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottage, Cwm Head, Church Stretton, Shropshire Barn At Crowsmoor Farm, Craven Arms Road, 16/01679/FUL 01/11/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Aston On Clun, Shropshire Land Adj St Milburga Chapel, Stoke Bank, Stoke St 16/02131/REM 14/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Milborough, Shropshire, SY8 2EJ Culmington Farm , Culmington, Ludlow, Shropshire, 16/02556/FUL 29/01/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 SY8 2DB Proposed Dwelling SW Of Culmington Farm, 16/02559/FUL 21/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Culmington , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adj Sun Inn, Corfton, 16/02751/OUT 09/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land At 1 Camp View, Craven Arms, Shropshire, 16/03287/OUT 19/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 9QN Proposed Residential Development Adj Redwood 16/03508/FUL 30/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 House, Redwood Drive, Aston On Clun, Shropshire Former Poultry Unit Site Corfton, Shropshire, SY7 16/03628/FUL 04/07/2017 7 0 7 7 0 0 9LD Proposed Dwelling East Of The Sun Inn, Corfton, 16/04173/REM 23/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land Off 16/04371/OUT 06/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 B4367, Broome, Shropshire Barn Known As Clee View Barn, Munslow, 16/04592/FUL 21/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Corfton Barn 16/04746/FUL 28/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Corfton, Shropshire 3 And 4 Bouldon Farm Cottages, Bouldon, Craven 16/04956/FUL 15/12/2016 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Arms, Shropshire, SY7 9DP The Craven Centre, Shrewsbury Road, Craven 16/05736/FUL 16/02/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Arms, SY7 9PX White Bryony, Wistanstow, Craven Arms, 17/00321/FUL 23/06/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8DQ Proposed Residential Development West Of 17/00782/FUL Broome Farm Barns, Broome, Aston On Clun, 31/08/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire

A14 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Upper Carwood Farm , Cheney Longville, Craven 17/01557/FUL 14/11/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Arms, Shropshire, SY7 8HH Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling Adj New 17/01587/REM 23/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 House Farm, Haytons Bent, Shropshire The Orchard, Aston On Clun, Craven Arms, 17/02160/FUL 11/07/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 8ET The Old Court House, Clun Road, Aston On Clun, 17/03073/FUL 05/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY7 8EW Proposed Affordable Dwelling East Of Red House, 17/03158/FUL 25/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Upper Hayton, Shropshire 17/03549/OUT Car Park Adj The Sun Inn, Corfton , Shropshire 10/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Barn Conversion Adj 4 Brookhampton, 17/03640/FUL 06/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Holdgate, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Church Farm , 17/03950/OUT 05/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stoke St Milborough, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land Off 17/04178/REM 29/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 B4367, Broome, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of Blacksmiths Cottage , 17/04466/REM 13/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Broome, Shropshire Outbuildings At Great Sutton Farm, Great Sutton, 17/04539/FUL 24/11/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire Barn To The North East Of Crowsmoor Farm , 17/04881/FUL 31/01/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Craven Arms Road, Aston On Clun, Shropshire Land Adj Long Acre, School Bank, Aston On Clun, 17/05242/FUL 20/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Craven Arms, Shropshire, SY7 8ET Land NW Of Broome Farm, Broome, Aston On 17/05652/FUL 20/09/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Clun, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South West Of Red Brick Barn, 17/05800/FUL 26/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Corfton, Shropshire Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling To The NE 17/05900/REM 31/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Of Middlehope, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 17/05915/OUT 06/04/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Garage Cottage, Westhope, Shropshire Manor Farm , Cleestanton, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 18/00241/FUL 23/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 3EL Land To The South Of Upper House, Stoke St 18/00317/FUL 22/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Milborough, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 2EJ Land Adjoining Hillside, Stoke St Milborough, 18/01085/FUL 12/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/01465/FUL 21/11/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 West Of Bache Mill, Diddlebury, Shropshire Orchard Bungalow, Aston Munslow, Craven Arms, 18/02625/OUT 29/08/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 9ER The Grove, Holdgate, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, 18/02847/FUL 14/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF13 6LN Proposed Dwelling To The South Of B4368, 18/02934/FUL 12/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Corfton, Shropshire Wisteria Cottage, Burley, Craven Arms, Shropshire, 18/04106/FUL 07/02/2019 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 SY7 9LW Proposed Dwelling Off Stoke Bank, Stoke St 18/04351/FUL 04/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Milborough, Shropshire Garages North Of Mynd View, Craven Arms, 18/04776/FUL 18/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions At Hale Barn, 18/05568/FUL 22/02/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Diddlebury, Shropshire Land Adj To Bockleton Court, Stoke St Milborough, SS/1/06/19024/RM 31/01/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ludlow

A15 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding New Affordable Dwelling, Off Red Lane, Hopesay, SS/1/09/21621/F 19/11/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire SS/1/99/10087/F Adj The Terrace, Stoke St Milborough, Nr Ludlow 01/01/2000 3 1 2 2 0 0 SS1997/08310 Barns At Whettleton, Craven Arms 01/11/1997 1 0 1 1 0 0 09/00428/FUL Outbuildings At Onston Farm, Tetchill, Ellesmere 16/11/2009 7 0 7 7 0 0 Old Hall Farm, Breaden Heath, Whitchurch, SY13 13/02964/FUL 17/12/2013 2 0 2 2 0 0 2LF Proposed Development Land South Of B5063, 14/01063/OUT 20/07/2016 7 0 7 7 0 0 Welshampton , Shropshire Proposed Development Land North Of St Andrews 14/01158/FUL 29/10/2014 16 0 16 16 0 0 Church, Welsh Frankton , Shropshire 14/02047/FUL The Hatch, Lyneal, Ellesmere, SY12 0QF 02/07/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Marina South Of Canal Way, Ellesmere, 14/04047/OUT 20/12/2016 250 0 250 37 37 37 37 148 37 37 74 28 28 Shropshire 14/04736/FUL Land At Perthy, Ellesmere, Shropshire 29/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 New Dwelling At Mayfield Farm, Elson, Ellesmere, 14/05016/FUL 05/06/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Of Brook 15/01345/FUL 09/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottage, Elson, Ellesmere, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling On The East Side Of Crosemere 15/02513/FUL 04/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Cockshutt , Shropshire Proposed Development Land South Of The 15/05415/REM 19/10/2017 112 27 85 25 25 25 10 85 0 0 Hawthorns, Ellesmere, Shropshire Tetchill Farm, Farm Lane, Tetchill, Ellesmere, 16/00318/OUT 11/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY12 9AW Frankton Farm, English Frankton, Ellesmere, 16/00673/FUL 22/06/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY12 0JX Buildings At Plas Thomas Farm, Dudleston, 16/01689/FUL 28/06/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Ellesmere , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of Harvest Cottage, 6 16/02825/FUL 09/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lower Perthy, Shropshire 16/03019/FUL 3A Scotland Street, Ellesmere, SY12 0DE 26/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 16/04059/FUL 31/01/2017 5 1 4 4 0 0 Chapel House Farm, Cockshutt, Shropshire

Proposed Dwelling At Eastwick Lane , Dudleston 16/04855/REM 14/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Heath, Ellesmere , Shropshire, SY12 9DX Proposed Dwelling NE Of Cambrian View, 8 Lower 17/00659/FUL 05/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Perthy, Shropshire Barns Opposite Old Marton Farm , Old Marton, 17/01507/FUL 01/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Ellesmere , Shropshire , SY12 9HZ Corner Farm, Welshampton, Ellesmere , Shropshire, 17/01768/FUL 18/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY12 0QA Land Adj. Brownlow Cottage, Welshampton, 17/02294/REM 21/08/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Ellesmere, Shropshire, SY12 0PH Proposed Local Needs Dwelling East Of 17/02540/FUL 03/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Brookfields, Lyneal, Ellesmere, Shropshire 17/03138/OUT 1 Higher Perthy, Ellesmere, Shropshire, SY12 9HP 18/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 17/03208/FUL Barn At Lee, Tetchill, Ellesmere, Shropshire 25/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Development Land Adjacent Cairndale , Hordley 17/03751/FUL 29/03/2018 13 5 8 8 0 0 Road, Tetchill, Shropshire 17/04190/OUT Land At Perthy, Ellesmere, Shropshire 01/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 17/04232/FUL 10 Petton Hall, Petton, Shrewsbury 27/06/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Dwellings Adj The Parklands, The 17/05018/FUL 24/11/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Parklands, Cockshutt, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling At Greenhill Bank, 17/05024/FUL 27/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Criftins, Ellesmere, Shropshire

A16 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/05043/REM 21/12/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 North Of Ellesmere Road, Tetchill, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of 9 Higher Perthy, 17/05284/OUT 28/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ellesmere, Shropshire Flannog Farm, Coed-yr-allt , Oswestry, Shropshire, 17/05822/FUL 23/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY11 3DR Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 18/00064/FUL 06/08/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Tetchill Farm, Farm Lane, Tetchill, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At Crickett, Lower Perthy, 18/00201/OUT 30/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 18/00697/FUL 5 Chapel Lane, Bagley, Shropshire, SY12 9BS 17/05/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Affordable Dwelling East Of The Croft, 18/01156/FUL 23/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Eastwick Lane, Dudleston Heath, Shropshire Orchard View, Welshampton, Shropshire, SY12 18/01598/FUL 08/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 0PH The Crown Shrewsbury Road, Cockshutt, 18/01807/REM 13/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY12 0JQ Land Adjacent To The Oaklands, Cockshutt, 18/02276/REM 20/02/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Agricultural Building At Reynolds Cottage, Kenwick 18/02906/FUL 06/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Park, Ellesmere, Shropshire 18/03051/FUL 18 Market Street, Ellesmere, Shropshire, SY12 0AN 11/09/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/03384/REM 09/11/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 South Of Cockshutt, Shropshire Main Road Chapel, Dudleston Heath, Ellesmere, 18/03488/FUL 26/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY12 9LE Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/03858/FUL 13/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 North Of Ellesmere Road, Tetchill, Shropshire Acorn Cottage, Lower Perthy, Ellesmere, 19/00293/OUT 28/03/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY12 9HX Proposed Dwelling South East Of The Woodlands, 19/00606/OUT 28/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Elson Road, Ellesmere, Shropshire Crosemere Grange, Crosemere, Cockshutt, NS/01/00367/FUL 29/08/2001 3 1 2 2 0 0 Ellesmere NS/06/02476/FUL Old Marton Farm, Old Marton, Ellesmere 08/01/2007 4 3 1 1 0 0 Land Rear Of Sheraton House, Birch Road, NS/07/01210/FUL 20/09/2007 12 3 9 9 0 0 Ellesmere NS/08/00044/DET Cheyne Walk, Lyneal Lane, Lyneal, Ellesmere 07/02/2008 1 0 1 1 0 0 NS/08/02002/FUL Rock Farm, St Martins, Oswestry 12/02/2009 4 0 4 4 0 0 NS/08/02110/FUL Corner Farm, Welshampton, Ellesmere 10/02/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 NS/09/00137/FUL Sycamore Farm, Hordley, Ellesmere 11/05/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 10/05321/FUL Riddings Farm, Chelmarsh, Bridgnorth 12/09/2011 3 1 2 2 0 0 Kings Arms Inn , Chelmarsh, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, 14/02727/FUL 16/05/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 WV16 6BQ Land Rear Of Beech Croft, Vicarage Lane, Highley, 14/02847/OUT 06/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire The Cedars , Bridgnorth Road, Highley, Bridgnorth, 14/03798/FUL 23/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 6EP Land Adjoining Abberley View, Highley, Shropshire, 14/04349/FUL 19/08/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 WV16 6NA 15/01582/FUL 71 Redstone Drive, Highley, Shropshire, WV16 6EQ 18/02/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0

Proposed Residential Development Land Adj The 15/02118/REM 14/10/2015 35 4 31 31 0 0 Cedars, Bridgnorth Road, Highley, Shropshire

A17 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 4 Cherry Orchard, Severnside, Highley, Bridgnorth, 16/02975/FUL 01/02/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 6NU Proposed Dwelling To The Rear Of Avicenna, 16/03194/FUL 05/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth Road , Highley, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling NW Of Whispering Trees, New 16/03641/FUL 29/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 England Lane, Highley, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion Off 16/05103/FUL 06/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Church Lane, Highley, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling South Of Sutton 16/05874/FUL 15/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Barn, Chelmarsh, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Glen Tor, Bridgnorth 17/02045/REM 31/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Highley , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of Kinlet View, 17/02273/FUL 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth Road , Highley, Shropshire Land To The Rear Of The Bache Arms, High Street, 17/02688/REM 10/08/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Highley, Shropshire, WV16 6JU 1 High Green Villas, Cockshutt Lane, Highley , 17/02788/FUL 31/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6JL Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Denvera , 17/04945/FUL 14/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth Road, Highley , Shropshire Proposed Replacement Dwelling At Site Of 3 18/00007/FUL 26/04/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cherry Orchard, Severnside, Highley, Shropshire

Agricultural Building West Of Hampton Loade 18/01467/FUL 27/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ferry, Hampton Loade, Bridgnorth, Shropshire Silverdale House, Silverdale Terrace, Highley, 18/01547/FUL 16/05/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 6LX Proposed Dwelling At The Site Of 2 Cherry 18/03032/OUT 07/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Orchard, Severn Side, Highley, Shropshire 10/04956/FUL Unit 11 23-24 Corve Street, Ludlow 31/01/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 11/00291/FUL Land Off Pepper Lane, Ludlow 28/06/2011 6 0 6 6 0 0 11/05428/FUL Land Adj Wayside, 4 Ashford Carbonell, Ludlow 02/07/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adjacent To 26 Maple Close, Ludlow, 12/04328/OUT 15/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY8 2PT Land South Of Spring Cottage, Steventon Road, 13/01665/FUL 31/03/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ludlow, Shropshire Lower Barns House, Lower Barns Road, Ludlow, 13/02795/FUL 02/10/2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 4DS Proposed Residential Development South Of A49, 13/03862/OUT 30/11/2015 215 0 215 36 36 36 36 144 36 35 71 0 Ludlow, Shropshire Chapel Works Old Street , Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 13/03933/FUL 29/10/2014 8 0 8 8 0 0 1NR Land Adj. New House Farm, Huntingdon Lane, 13/04981/FUL 15/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ashford Carbonell , Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 4DG Development Land North Side Of Sheet Road, 14/01012/OUT 12/09/2016 68 0 68 30 30 8 68 0 0 Ludlow, Shropshire Car Park At Penny Black Inn, Knowbury, Ludlow, 14/01245/FUL 03/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 3LL 14/01651/REM 3 Livesey Avenue, Ludlow , Shropshire, SY8 1HN 30/07/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Coach Depot, Fishmore Road, Ludlow, Shropshire, 14/02846/OUT 07/02/2017 20 0 20 20 0 0 SY8 2LU Community Hall Forresters Road, Burford, WR15 14/03384/FUL 19/01/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 8AT Woodcroft Farm, Richards Castle, Ludlow, 14/04121/FUL 11/12/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 4EB

A18 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land At 14/04608/OUT 10/11/2016 137 0 137 17 40 40 97 40 40 0 Foldgate Lane, Ludlow, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North West Of 20 Lower 15/00405/OUT 22/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Galdeford, Ludlow, Shropshire 15/00665/COU 9 Corve Street, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1DA 25/03/2015 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Ludford House, Overton Road, Ludford, Ludlow , 15/00949/FUL 09/05/2016 7 1 6 6 0 0 SY8 1PJ The Lodge Camp Lane, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 15/01819/FUL 26/04/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 1EQ Westwinds Gravel Hill, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 15/02443/FUL 29/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 1QU 15/02552/FUL 4 King Street, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1AQ 02/11/2015 6 0 6 6 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land To The 15/04158/OUT 04/07/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 South Of Rocks Green, Ludlow, Shropshire Land On The South East Side Of Springfield Park, 15/04841/VAR 29/04/2016 29 19 10 10 0 0 Clee Hill, Shropshire Land Adjacent To 17 Maple Close, Ludlow, 16/00708/OUT 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 2PT Harvest House, Portcullis Lane, Ludlow, Shropshire , 16/00761/FUL 11/10/2016 11 0 11 11 0 0 SY8 1PZ 1 The Courtyard, 19 Lower Galdeford, Ludlow , 16/01035/FUL 17/05/2016 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 1RN Proposed Affordable Dwelling Adjacent Mitnell 16/02243/FUL 18/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Villa, Mitnell Lane, Richards Castle, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of 16/03096/OUT 19/02/2019 67 0 67 36 31 67 0 0 Fishmore Road, Ludlow, Shropshire 16/03159/FUL 5 Market Street, Ludlow, SY8 1BP 08/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 The Queens, 114 Lower Galdeford, Ludlow, SY8 16/03798/FUL 22/02/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 1RU Proposed Dwelling North Of Orchard Cottage, 16/03858/FUL 14/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Springfield Close, Ludlow, Shropshire 16/04032/FUL 9 Tower Street, Ludlow , SY8 1RL 13/04/2017 10 0 10 10 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of Nelson Inn, Rocks 16/04192/FUL 13/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Green, Ludlow, Shropshire 16/04706/FUL 9 - 10 King Street, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1AQ 19/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land North Of Titterstone Cottages, Titterstone, 16/05009/FUL 31/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South Of Swanlea, Tenbury 16/05113/OUT 14/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Clee Hill, Shropshire 5 Castle Close, Burford, Tenbury Wells, Shropshire, 16/05497/OUT 13/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 WR15 8AY Proposed Residential Development Land West Of 3 16/05602/FUL 08/11/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Friars Walk, Ludlow, Shropshire Land Adjoining Linney House , Linney, Ludlow, 17/00230/FUL 17/05/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 1EE Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Of The Nook, 17/01015/FUL 21/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Clee Hill Road, Burford , Shropshire Riverside, 18 Temeside, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 17/01056/FUL 26/04/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 1PD 17/01179/FUL Mr Underhills, Dinham , Ludlow, SY8 1EH 19/05/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 17/01333/FUL Land South Of Poyner Road, Ludlow, Shropshire 18/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwellings Rear Of 18 Bull Ring, Ludlow, 17/03015/FUL 17/10/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire 17/03029/FUL The Kremlin, Clee Hill , Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 3NB 23/08/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Of Green 17/04203/FUL 12/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Onibury, Shropshire

A19 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Whitton Court, Whitton , Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 17/04607/FUL 09/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 3AB Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 17/05189/FUL 23/01/2019 200 0 200 36 36 36 36 144 36 20 56 0 Rocks Green, Ludlow, Shropshire 17/05523/FUL Bankside, Burway Lane, Ludlow, SY8 1DT 19/03/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 17/05883/FUL Old China Shop, Pepper Lane, Ludlow, SY8 1PX 07/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling West Of 2 Riddings Meadow, 17/05958/FUL 16/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ludlow, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development, Adjacent To 18/01182/FUL 18/05/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Whitefriars, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1RA Keepers Cottage, Whitton Court, Whitton, Ludlow, 18/01575/FUL 23/07/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY8 3AB Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 18/02930/FUL 03/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Poyner Road, Ludlow, Shropshire Barn South West Of The Grove, Ashford Bowdler, 18/03585/FUL 19/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 18/04333/FUL Pool House At 7 Summerfields, Ludlow, Shropshire 29/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Fmr Warehouse & Courtyard, Pepper Lane, SS/1/04/15399/F 01/04/2004 4 0 4 4 0 0 Ludlow SS/1/07/19934/F Land Off Springfield Park, Clee Hill, Ludlow 09/11/2007 13 0 13 13 0 0 SS/1/08/21335/F 23-24 Corve Street, Ludlow 26/10/2009 14 0 14 14 0 0 09/00942/REM 40 Quarry Bank Road, Market Drayton 04/08/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wood Lane Farm, Wood Lane, Hinstock, Market 09/01127/FUL 30/10/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton 09/01693/FUL The Old School, London Road, Woore, Crewe 21/09/2009 3 2 1 1 0 0

09/01858/FUL Stoke Grange, Shrewsbury Road, Market Drayton 13/10/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 Stoke Grange, Shrewsbury Road, Tern Hill, Market 10/01122/FUL 17/08/2010 7 0 7 7 0 0 Drayton

10/01818/FUL 3 Bartons Lane, Market Drayton 30/06/2010 4 0 4 4 0 0

10/03337/FUL 4 Kilnbank Crescent, Market Drayton 24/09/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 The Stables, Chipnall, Cheswardine, Market 10/04755/FUL 26/09/2012 4 0 4 4 0 0 Drayton 11/00667/FUL Mount Farm, Little Bolas, Telford 11/01/2011 5 4 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Old Croft House, Clive Road, Market 11/00747/FUL 31/03/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton The Round House, Tag Lane, Chipnal, Market 11/00819/FUL 19/04/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton 11/01043/FUL All Sun, 45 Great Hales Street, Market Drayton 02/08/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0

11/01132/FUL Spinney Gate, Red Bank Road, Market Drayton 13/10/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cheswardine Farm, High Street, Cheswardine, 11/02594/FUL 07/02/2014 6 0 6 6 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 2RS Shelley Signs Ltd, Eaton Upon Tern, Market 11/03440/FUL 14/03/2013 13 0 13 13 0 0 Drayton 11/04864/FUL Cotton Farm, Stoke Upon Tern, Market Drayton 16/01/2012 5 0 5 5 0 0 Land Between 2 And 3 Chestnut Road, Market 11/04957/FUL 21/12/2011 2 0 2 2 0 0 Drayton Land Adj. Stafford Lodge, Hinstock, Market 12/00420/FUL 10/07/2013 2 1 1 1 0 0 Drayton Lostford Manor, Lostford Lane, Lostford, Market 12/00800/FUL 14/12/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton

A20 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Cheswardine, Farm High Street, Cheswardine, 12/01014/REM 05/02/2013 7 0 7 7 0 0 Market Drayton Agricultural Buildings North West Of Colehurst 12/01091/FUL 04/01/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottages, Rosehill, Market Drayton Shropshire Land To Rear Of Kings Arms, Shropshire Street, 12/01413/FUL 28/04/2015 11 4 7 7 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3DA 12/02563/FUL Woore Hall Farm, Audlem Road, Woore, Crewe 08/04/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0

The Clock Tower, The Stables Chipnall 12/02821/FUL 26/09/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cheswardine Market Drayton Tf9 2Rj Colehurst Manor, Colehurst, Market Drayton, TF9 12/02874/FUL 13/12/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 2JB 12/03852/FUL Elms Farm, Ollerton, Market Drayton, TF9 2BU 15/01/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 13/00314/FUL The Beeches, Ollerton, Market Drayton 19/09/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Red Barn, Main Road, Norton In Hales, Market 13/00961/FUL 02/08/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton Land To East Of Bolas Road, Ercall Heath, Telford , 13/01828/FUL 25/02/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF6 6PN Land Off Websters Lane, Station Road, Hodnet, 13/02414/FUL 02/10/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3JD Barn To Rear Of 66 Shropshire Street, Market 13/02922/FUL 03/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton , Shropshire , TF9 3DG Land Off Abbots Way, Hodnet, Shropshire, TF9 13/03452/FUL 26/10/2018 44 0 44 44 0 0 3NQ 14/00584/FUL The Beeches, Ollerton, Market Drayton , TF9 2BU 04/09/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land South Of Bank Farm, Kenstone, Hodnet , 14/00698/FUL 22/05/2015 2 1 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land Off Bearstone Road, Norton In Hales, Market 14/00790/OUT 05/06/2015 14 7 7 7 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Knightswood, 14/02309/OUT 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Newcastle Road, Market Drayton, Shropshire The Bungalow, Smithfield Road, Market Drayton, 14/02317/OUT 09/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 1EP 14/03637/OUT Land To South Of Audlem Road, Woore , Shropshire 25/01/2016 5 0 5 5 0 0 Land South Of 54 Red Bank Road, Market Drayton, 14/03759/FUL 03/05/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Land Off Greenfields Lane, Market Drayton, 14/03782/OUT 09/03/2018 250 0 250 25 37 37 99 37 37 74 77 77 Shropshire 15 Smithfield Road, Market Drayton, Shropshire, 14/04203/FUL 02/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF9 1EP 14/04258/VAR Hillcrest, Salisbury Road, Market Drayton 30/09/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land East Of 14/04785/OUT Villa Farm, Wistanswick, Market Drayton, 07/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Hoar Lake Farm, Golden Hill Lane, Hinstock, 15/00087/FUL 16/07/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Market Drayton, TF9 2NE Park Heath Farm, Park Heath, Cheswardine, 15/00269/FUL 01/06/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2NP Land At 18 Dutton Close , Stoke Heath , Market 15/00415/OUT 05/02/2016 25 0 25 25 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2JN Land West Of Sandyacre, Bletchley Road, 15/01822/FUL 01/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bletchley, Market Drayton, Shropshire Land South Of Bletchley Court, Bletchley, Market 15/02089/FUL 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Land Adj 39 Alexandra Road, Market Drayton, 15/02188/FUL 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , TF9 3HU

A21 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land Adjacent To Longford Grange, Longford, 15/03114/FUL 20/06/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3PW

Land Adj Hunters Lodge, Hatton Road, Hinstock, 15/03857/FUL 01/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2SR Stoke Heath Camp , Warrant Road, Stoke Heath, 15/03969/OUT 25/05/2016 38 0 38 38 0 0 Shropshire 15/04244/REM Yew Tree Farm, Wistanswick, Market Drayton 06/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 12 Church Street, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 16/00367/FUL 08/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 1AF Land North Of Glencott, Longslow, Market 16/00661/OUT 16/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Land Rear Of Moat House, Newport Road, 16/00790/REM 06/06/2017 47 15 32 32 0 0 Hinstock, Shropshire Old Station Yard, Pipe Gate, Market Drayton, 16/00820/REM 31/03/2016 10 0 10 10 0 0 Shropshire Land At Colehurst Fishery, Colehurst , Market 16/00897/REM 24/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Land Adj The Smithy, Moss Lane , Chipnall , 16/01228/FUL 30/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cheswardine, Shropshire Land Adjacent To The Grove, London Road, Woore , 16/01371/REM 24/11/2016 21 14 7 7 0 0 Shropshire, CW3 9SQ 15A And 15B Smithfield Road, Market Drayton, 16/01642/FUL 18/05/2016 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 1EP Land Adj Warren Heights, London Road, Irelands 16/01907/REM 17/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Cross, Woore , Shropshire 12 - 16 Cheshire Street , Market Drayton, 16/02724/FUL 27/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 1PD Hurst Farm, Hurst Lane, Stoke Upon Tern, Market 16/02830/FUL 04/08/2016 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2LD Land At Cliffe Grange, Buntingsdale, Market 16/03010/FUL 13/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Drayton , Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land On Both 16/03082/REM 20/03/2017 162 40 122 25 25 25 25 22 122 0 0 Sides Of Rush Lane, Market Drayton , Shropshire

Land Off Ollerton Road, Heathcote Crossroads, 16/03393/FUL 14/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stoke Upon Tern, Shropshire, TF9 2LB Land Adj Moreton Lodge, Moreton Say, Market 16/03482/REM 25/10/2016 7 0 7 7 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3RS Land South Of Church Farm, Moreton Say, Market 16/03483/REM 27/10/2016 9 0 9 9 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Childs Ercall C.E. Primary School, Village Road, 16/03700/FUL 19/10/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Childs Ercall, TF9 2DA 69 Shropshire Street, Market Drayton, Shropshire, 16/03714/FUL 01/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF9 3DQ Land West Of The Old Garden House, Quarry 16/04270/OUT 10/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 House Lane, Market Drayton, Shropshire Southfields Farm, Haywood Lane, Cheswardine, 16/04336/FUL 18/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2RP Alford Green Farm, The Nook, Childs Ercall, Market 16/04349/FUL 17/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2DJ Proposed Dwelling South Of 3 16/04428/FUL 02/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Dog Kennel Lane, Market Drayton, Shropshire Store South Of Hodnet Medical Centre, 16/04612/FUL 27/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Abbots Way, Hodnet, Shropshire 16/05042/FUL 72 Shropshire Street, Market Drayton, TF9 3DG 05/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

A22 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land NW Of 16/05408/FUL The Talbot Hotel , Newcastle Road, Market 06/06/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Land At Farcross, London Road, Woore , 16/05721/REM 23/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, CW3 9RQ Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 17/01205/OUT The Villas, Longford Turning, Market Drayton, 20/06/2018 9 0 9 9 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land Off 17/01511/OUT 24/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Rosehill Road, Stoke Heath, Shropshire 2 Dutton Close, Stoke Heath, Market Drayton, TF9 17/01534/OUT 30/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 2JN Land East Of Smithfield Road, Market Drayton, 17/01558/FUL 24/07/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Land at the Lodge, Ellerton, Newport , Shropshire, 17/01875/FUL 21/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF10 8AW The Bungalow, Wood Lane, Hinstock, Market 17/01919/FUL 16/06/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire , TF9 2TA Plot 1, Land Adjacent Manor Farm Drive, Hinstock, 17/02161/FUL 07/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 2, Land Adjacent Manor Farm Drive, Hinstock, 17/02163/FUL 07/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 3, Land Adjacent Manor Farm Drive, Hinstock, 17/02164/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 4, Land Adjacent Manor Farm Drive, Hinstock, 17/02165/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 5, Land Adjacent Manor Farm Drive , Hinstock, 17/02166/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The South Of The Pines, 57 17/02358/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Buntingsdale Road , Market Drayton, Shropshire

17/02908/FUL Red Lion Hotel, High Street, Cheswardine, TF9 2RS 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0

Proposed Local Needs Dwelling South West Of 2 17/03362/FUL 24/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Dodecote Drive, Childs Ercall, Shropshire Land East Of Beswicks Lane, Norton In Hales, 17/03643/REM 16/11/2017 12 8 4 4 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire Marsh Farm, Marsh Lane, Soudley, Market 17/04099/FUL 30/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2SF Proposed Residential Development Land East Of 6 17/04640/OUT 24/11/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Longslow, Market Drayton, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/04913/OUT 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 East Of Rosehill Road, Stoke Heath, Shropshire 17/04978/FUL 9 High Street, Cheswardine , TF9 2RS 19/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Talbot Hotel, Newcastle Road, Market Drayton, 17/05002/FUL 21/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , TF9 1HW The Mews, Phoenix Bank, Market Drayton, 17/05005/FUL 06/02/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 1JT Land At Rear Of 67-75 Shropshire Street, Off 17/05355/FUL 20/03/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Kilnbank Road, Market Drayton, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South Of The Old Vicarage, 17/05434/FUL 18/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Childs Ercall, Shropshire Land Adjacent Tawney, Websters Lane, Hodnet, 17/05687/OUT 12/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 3JH Proposed Residential Conversion Of Outbuilding At 17/05710/FUL 17/04/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Hinstock Hall, Hatton Road, Hinstock, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North West Of New Cottages, 17/05920/OUT 19/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Childs Ercall, Shropshire

A23 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Pine View, Lockleywood, Hinstock, Market 17/05945/FUL 12/03/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2LU The Warren, Newcastle Road, Market Drayton, 17/05957/OUT 05/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 1HW 18/00137/FUL Sandyford Farm, Audlem Road, Woore, CW3 9RN 09/04/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0

18/00202/OUT 10 Longslow, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3QY 11/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling To The North Of Longslow 18/00319/FUL 30/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Market Drayton, Shropshire Garden House, Peplow, Market Drayton, 18/00482/FUL 13/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 3JP Land Adjacent 64 Dalelands Estate, Market 18/00823/OUT 22/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire Old Colehurst Manor, Colehurst, Market Drayton, 18/00859/FUL 14/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 2JB Proposed Dwelling To The North West Of The 18/01736/OUT Garner House, Peplow, Market Drayton, 14/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At The Former Slaughterhouse, 18/01804/OUT 25/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Longslow, Market Drayton, Shropshire 69B Stafford Street, Market Drayton, Shropshire, 18/01889/FUL 29/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF9 1JD The Old Laundry, Shavington Home Farm, 18/01895/FUL Shavington Park, Adderley, Market Drayton, 12/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 3TB Land And Buildings South Of Towers Lawn, Market 18/01934/FUL 22/10/2018 10 0 10 10 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3AA Stafford Court Hotel, Stafford Street, Market 18/02277/FUL 26/10/2018 8 0 8 8 0 0 Drayton, TF9 1HY Land South Of Moat House, Newport Road, 18/02279/FUL 12/02/2019 4 0 4 4 0 0 Hinstock, Shropshire The Orchards, Gravenhunger Lane, Woore, CW3 18/02565/FUL 17/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 9RF Land East Of 8 Longslow, Market Drayton , 18/02682/REM 19/09/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Land To The Rear, Cresswell House, 49 Stafford 18/02784/FUL 07/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Street, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 1JD Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Brookside, Station 18/02905/FUL 18/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Hodnet, Shropshire 18/03370/FUL 4 Stafford Street, Market Drayton, TF9 1HY 17/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Brooklands, Adderley Road, Market Drayton, TF9 18/03429/OUT 19/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 3SW Dale House, Hinstock, Market Drayton, Shropshire, 18/03446/FUL 29/03/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 TF9 2TH The Bungalow, 4 Hopshort, Soudley, Cheswardine, 18/03614/FUL 18/10/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2NS Land South Of Oak Cottage 27 London Road, 18/03639/FUL 15/11/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Woore, Shropshire Precolor Sales Ltd, Newport Road, Market Drayton, 18/03814/FUL 07/11/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 TF9 2AA Tudor House Hotel, 1 Cheshire Street, Market 18/04100/FUL 05/12/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 1PD 24 Charlesway, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 18/04132/FUL 21/12/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 1DA Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 18/04470/OUT Holly Cottage, Rosehill Road, Stoke Heath, 14/12/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire 18/04806/FUL 2 Shrewsbury Street, Hodnet, TF9 3NP 27/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0

A24 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Residential Development Site, Hospital Lane, 18/04890/FUL 07/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire Land Adjacent 49 Shrewsbury Road, Market 18/05031/FUL 18/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire 18/05152/FUL Clay House, Kenstone, Hodnet, Shropshire 15/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land South East Of Longford Farm, Longford , 18/05523/REM 30/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton , Shropshire Land Adjacent To Unit, 1 Station Yard, Pipe Gate, 18/05865/FUL 08/03/2019 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The East Of The Bowling 18/05892/FUL House, The Avenue, Peplow, Market Drayton, 14/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 19/00116/FUL 4-5 High Street, Market Drayton, TF9 1PY 08/03/2019 3 0 3 3 0 0 Plot 15 Bearstone View, Norton In Hales, Market 19/00146/FUL 27/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 4AP 31 Bartons Road, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 19/00299/FUL 04/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 1DD Land Rear Of 9 High Street, Cheswardine, Market 19/00437/FUL 27/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2RS NS/01/00837/FUL Church Farm, Adderley, Market Drayton 16/01/2002 2 0 2 2 0 0 Land At Tern Fisheries, Newcastle Road, Market NS/03/00206/FUL 10/04/2003 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton NS/04/00276/FUL Church Farm, Adderley, Market Drayton 10/11/2004 4 0 4 4 0 0 72 Shopshire Street, Shopshire Street, Market NS/05/00314/FUL 25/07/2005 3 0 3 3 0 0 Drayton NS/05/01227/FUL Avenue Farm, Woodseaves, Market Drayton 16/08/2005 2 1 1 1 0 0 Woodside Cottage, Howle, Newport, Shropshire, NS/06/00225/FUL 15/03/2006 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF10 8AZ Bldgs At Lostford Hall, Lostford Lane, Wollerton, NS/06/00673/FUL 12/04/2007 4 0 4 4 0 0 Market Drayton Dodecote Grange, Dodecote Drive, Childs Ercall, NS/07/00419/FUL 18/04/2007 6 3 3 3 0 0 Market Drayton NS/07/01523/FUL Wollerton Farm, Wollerton, Market Drayton 25/09/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 NS/07/01850/FUL 4 St Marys Street, Market Drayton 01/11/2007 2 0 2 2 0 0 Haywood Farm, Haywood Lane, Cheswardine, NS/07/02135/FUL 27/12/2007 6 0 6 6 0 0 Market Drayton NS/08/01173/FUL Adj To 2 The Mount, Mount Lane, Market Drayton 20/08/2008 1 0 1 1 0 0 NS/08/01394/FUL Wheatsheaf Inn, Soudley, Market Drayton 01/07/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 74 Grove Gardens, Market Drayton, Shropshire, NS/08/02032/FUL 13/01/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 TF9 1HQ NS/09/01071/FUL Land Off Red Bank, Market Drayton 21/07/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 NS/09/70169/FUL Church Farm, Moreton Saye, Market Drayton 12/06/2009 5 0 5 5 0 0 Erection Of An Affordable Dwelling , Drury Lane, 09/01742/FUL 13/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 13/03185/REM Land At Wallop Hall, Westbury, Shrewsbury 05/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land At Minsterley Road, Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, 14/01233/OUT 17/03/2015 18 0 18 18 0 0 Shropshire The Warehouse, Pontesford Hill , Pontesbury, 14/02414/FUL 16/06/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 0UB Land Off Horsebridge Road, Minsterley, 14/03670/OUT 29/01/2016 28 0 28 28 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire, SY5 0AA Office At Kimcot, 8 Pontesford Hill , Pontesbury, 14/04629/FUL 07/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire , SY5 0UH.

Land Adj To 2 & 3 Brook Villas, Brookside, 14/04998/OUT 14/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesbury, Shrewsbury , Shropshire, SY5 0RY Lower Farm , Habberley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 15/00227/FUL 30/06/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 SY5 0TP Proposed Dwelling NW Of The Fishpools, 15/01045/FUL 27/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesford Hill, Pontesbury , Shropshire .

A25 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling, 15/01178/FUL 09/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Yockleton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire . Barns At Brookside Farm, Pontesford , Shrewsbury, 15/01726/FUL 28/10/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire . Proposed Dwelling SE Of Yew Tree Cottage, Off 15/01982/REM 23/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Grove Lane, Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire .

Proposed Conversion At Bridge Mews , Minsterley, 15/03944/FUL 05/07/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire , SY5 0BA Land North East Of David Avenue, Pontesbury, 15/04103/REM 13/01/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire. Proposed Dwelling North Of Nevada, Pontesbury, 16/00060/REM 04/03/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire . The Mount Nursery, Minsterley Road, Pontesbury, 16/03114/REM 14/09/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire The Waterfall , Malehurst, Minsterley, Shrewsbury , 16/04234/OUT 05/06/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0BX Ty Newydd, Ford Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/04429/COU 06/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY5 9GZ Park Farm, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/04442/FUL 11/01/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 SY5 0DH Proposed Dwelling To The West of Back Lane, 16/04697/REM 23/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesford, Shrewsbury, Shropshire . Development Land To The West Of, Leigh Road, 16/04745/OUT 26/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Workshop Waverley Cottage, Pontesbury Hill 16/05293/FUL 23/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, SY5 0YH Development Land To The South Of Orchid 17/00251/VAR 22/05/2015 56 48 8 8 8 0 0 Meadow, Minsterley, Shrewsbury , Shropshire

Proposed Development Land, West Of Telephone 17/00836/REM 21/12/2017 25 0 25 25 0 0 Exchange, Hanwood , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Brookfield Place, Plox Green Road, Minsterley, 17/02000/FUL 03/08/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shrewsbury , SY5 0BE South Of Holly Cottage, Pontesford Hill, 17/02347/REM 26/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesbury , Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South Of Gylands, Little 17/02541/FUL 28/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Land And Farm Buildings To The East Of Leigh 17/02609/FUL 19/10/2017 7 0 7 7 0 0 Road, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Little Orchard, Lea Cross, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 17/03099/FUL 04/09/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 SY5 8JE Proposed Residential Development East Of The 17/03575/REM Warehouse, Pontesford Hill, Pontesbury, 12/12/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Land Adjacent To Honeysuckle Cottage, Cruckton, 17/04013/REM 12/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 8PR Proposed Dwelling To The North Of Leigh Road, 17/04286/FUL 10/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 28 Linley Avenue , Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, SY5 17/05054/FUL 12/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 0TE Plox Green Garage, Snailbeach, Shrewsbury, 18/03518/REM 28/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 0LN Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Hall Bank, 18/03749/REM 20/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesbury, Shrewsbury , Shropshire R/O Snipers House And West Of Ivy Cottage, 09/00255/REM 03/11/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Easthope, Much Wenlock

A26 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding The Lyndens, Station Road, Much Wenlock, 12/01806/FUL 08/07/2014 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire , TF13 6JE Sheinwood Farm Barns, Sheinton , Much Wenlock, 12/03174/FUL 26/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , TF13 6NR 12/04294/FUL New House Farm, Shipton, Much Wenlock 26/09/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 New Dwelling At Church Farm Buildings, Kenley, 12/05152/FUL 11/04/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 13/02800/FUL Mapp Farm, Kenley, Shrewsbury, SY5 6NR 22/09/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Barn At Maypole Bank, Kenley , Shrewsbury, 13/04208/FUL 09/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land Adj. To 6 Bridge Road, Much Wenlock, 14/01481/FUL 12/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6BA Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwellings At 14/03196/FUL 14/09/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Brockton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire Land West Of Church Farm , Buildwas , Telford , 14/03763/OUT 18/08/2015 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire 14/04441/FUL The Arc , Bourton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire 21/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Outbuildings At Bridge Farm , Buildwas Road, 14/04778/FUL 02/10/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Ironbridge, Telford, Shropshire Rose Cottage, Aston Munslow, Craven Arms, 14/05413/FUL 07/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY7 9ER Land To The East Of Bourton Road, Much Wenlock, 15/00323/FUL 28/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 15/00862/VAR Hill Farm, Bourton, Much Wenlock 12/10/2004 5 2 3 3 0 0 Proposed Affordable Housing Development Site , 15/00878/FUL 04/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Homer, Much Wenlock, Shropshire Former Sorting Office, St Marys Lane , Much 15/01711/FUL 15/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6HD Proposed Affordable Dwelling NW Of Upper House 15/02400/FUL 05/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Brockton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire

15/02476/FUL Forge Barn , S W Of Harley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 18/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling At Malthouse Farm, Stanton 15/03249/FUL 14/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Long, Much Wenlock, Shropshire Rock House Inn, Much Wenlock Road, Farley, 15/04010/FUL 26/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6NX Flat 1 And 264A High Street, Much Wenlock, 15/04052/FUL 28/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6AE Barn Conversion At Hill Farm, Bourton, Much 15/04539/FUL 16/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire Barn To The North Of Woodfield House, St Marys 16/00642/FUL 21/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Much Wenlock, Shropshire , TF13 6HD Proposed Affordable Dwelling At 16/00752/FUL 08/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Brockton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire Barn Conversions At Hill Farm, Bourton, Much 16/04223/FUL 21/06/2017 6 0 6 6 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire Barn At Park Farm, Harley Road, Cressage, 16/05296/FUL 31/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 17/00998/FUL Victoria Road, 40 High Street, Much Wenlock, 24/10/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Land At Mardol House, King Street, Much Wenlock, 17/01020/FUL 09/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6BL Broomcroft Farm , Kenley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 17/01087/FUL 16/07/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 SY5 6NQ Barn Adjacent Malt House, Stanton Long, Much 17/01196/FUL 20/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire Moor Park, Brockton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, 17/01287/FUL 30/05/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 TF13 6JU

A27 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Barn At Maypole Bank, Kenley, Shrewsbury, 17/01747/FUL 14/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Former Post Office, Park View, Buildwas, Telford, 17/01867/FUL 16/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF8 7BY 17/01948/OUT Appleby, Buildwas, Telford, Shropshire, TF8 7BX 10/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land East Of Jessamine Cottage, Kenley, 17/02871/FUL 20/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling To The East Of 17/03490/FUL 04/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bourton Road, Much Wenlock, Shropshire The Homestead, Buildwas, Telford, Shropshire, TF8 17/05042/FUL 17/09/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 7BX Talbot Garage, Bourton Road, Much Wenlock, 17/05513/FUL 17/01/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6AJ Proposed Affordable Dwelling East Of Bourton 17/05723/FUL 15/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Much Wenlock, Shropshire Abbey House, Much Wenlock Road, Buildwas, 17/05795/FUL 23/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Telford, Shropshire, TF8 7BP 18/00186/OUT Land SW Of Home Farm, Buildwas, Shropshire 06/12/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 2 Saplins Lane, Buildwas, Telford, Shropshire, TF8 18/01327/FUL 20/07/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 7DE Proposed Barn Conversion To The West Of More 18/02260/FUL 17/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Court, Brockton, Much Wenlock, Shropshire

18/02773/REM Appleby, Buildwas, Telford, Shropshire, TF8 7BX 28/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Severn Edge Veterinary Centre, Victoria Road, 18/04113/FUL 24/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6AH The Wheatlands Bungalow, Station Road, Much 18/05075/FUL 16/01/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 6JE Woodhouse Farm, Off Farley Road, Wyke, Much BR/APP/FUL/00/0810 15/02/2001 2 0 2 2 0 0 Wenlock BR/APP/FUL/03/0403 Manor Farm, I317, Easthope, Much Wenlock 22/07/2003 2 0 2 2 0 0 SA/09/0029/F Land At Church Farm, Buildwas, Telford 10/03/2009 4 1 3 3 0 0 Yew Tree Cottage, Ellesmere Road, St Martins, 10/02919/REM 02/09/2010 4 0 4 4 0 0 Oswestry 10/03081/FUL The Old Mill, Queens Head, Oswestry 06/10/2010 2 1 1 1 0 0 Jones & Hughes Stone Merchants, Salop Road, 10/04149/FUL 19/11/2010 3 0 3 3 0 0 Oswestry 10/05252/FUL Ivy House Farm, Knockin, Oswestry 13/09/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 10/05265/FUL Plas Cerrig Farm, Plas Cerig Lane, Llanymynech 28/01/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 10/05336/FUL Trepenal Farm, Crickheath, Oswestry 01/03/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 11/01299/FUL Griffin House Farm, St Martins, Oswestry 23/12/2011 2 1 1 1 0 0 11/02451/FUL Brookside, Bronygarth, Oswestry, SY10 7LY 21/05/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Laundry Cottage, School Lane, Trefonen, 11/02957/FUL 03/02/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry Conversion Of Former Malthouse, Weirbrook, 11/03157/FUL 23/11/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 West Felton, Shropshire 11/04458/FUL Upper Craignant Farm, Selattyn, Oswestry 13/01/2012 2 0 2 2 0 0 12/02476/FUL The Miners Arms Morda , Oswestry, SY10 9NY 05/11/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 Hairdressing Salon, Station Road, Whittington, 12/03176/FUL 08/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY11 4DA The Hollies, Dovaston, Kinnerley, Oswestry, 12/03866/FUL 19/01/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8DS Land Adjacent No 1 Mount Houses, Upper Chirk 12/04154/OUT 29/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bank, Chirk Bank, Shropshire, LL14 5DY White House Barn, Middleton Road, Middleton, 13/01003/FUL 14/05/2013 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Oswestry Land Adjoining Yeardsley, Croeswylan Lane, 13/02031/FUL 17/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry , Shropshire, SY10 9PT

A28 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Admiral Benbow, Church Street, Ruyton XI Towns, 13/02617/FUL 05/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 1LA Land At Waen Lane, Maesbury Marsh, Shropshire, 13/03484/FUL 10/09/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY10 8JD Kenilworth Villa, Llanymynech, Shropshire, SY22 13/04711/OUT 27/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 6LG 13/04954/OUT 104 Llwyn Road, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1EW 25/06/2015 12 0 12 12 0 0 The Beeches, Gobowen, Oswestry, Shropshire, 14/00892/OUT 05/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY11 3PH Proposed Dwelling Corner Of Heather Bank And 14/01038/FUL 11/08/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Fernhill Lane, Gobowen, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development West Of Ty 14/01986/OUT 15/09/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Draw, Oak Lane, Treflach, Shropshire The Woodlands Hotel , Middleton Road, Oswestry, 14/02177/VAR 14/05/2014 10 0 10 10 0 0 Shropshire , SY11 2PS Purton Villa, Church Street, Ruyton Xi Towns, 14/03158/REM 27/02/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 1LA 14/03184/FUL Brogyntyn Hall, Brogyntyn, Oswestry , SY10 7DA 02/07/2015 69 0 69 15 25 25 4 69 0 0 Garage Adjacent To The Last Inn, Hengoed, 14/03665/OUT 09/05/2017 16 0 16 16 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Top Street, 14/03788/OUT 28/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whittington, Shropshire Trevor House Church Lane, St. Martins, Oswestry , 14/03939/OUT 29/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY11 3AP Proposed Residential Development West Of Darlee 14/04168/OUT 07/12/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Cottage, Brownhill , Ruyton Xi Towns, Shropshire Residential Development Land East Of Earlshaw, 14/04506/REM 17/08/2015 5 4 1 1 0 0 Weston Rhyn, Shropshire Land Adj 3 Hindford, Whittington, Oswestry , 14/04965/FUL 16/12/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY11 4NL Briarsfield, Chapel Lane, Knockin Heath, 14/05018/REM 08/06/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8ED The Sawmills , Rhoswiel , Weston Rhyn, Oswestry , 14/05708/OUT 18/09/2017 62 0 62 25 25 50 12 12 0 Shropshire, SY10 7TG Land South Of Maple House, Station Road, Pant , 14/05722/OUT 09/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 9QL Proposed Residential Development To The North 15/00717/OUT 15/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Of Tregarthen Lane, Pant, Shropshire Land At West Lea , Rhoswiel , Weston Rhyn, 15/01049/OUT 09/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire New Dwelling, Plot 3 SW Of The Royal Oak, 15/01675/REM 20/08/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Treflach, Shropshire. Proposed Development Land Between Brooklands 15/02272/FUL 03/05/2016 3 1 2 2 0 0 And The Rise, Weston Rhyn, Shropshire Land Adj White House , Crickheath, Oswestry, 15/02392/FUL 04/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8BW Land At Rhosyllan Farm, Overton Road, St Martins, 15/03726/OUT 15/08/2016 80 0 80 20 30 30 80 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 3ER 15/04319/REM Land East Of Old Rectory, Selattyn, Shropshire 16/12/2015 9 0 9 9 0 0 Former Store, Walnut House, Little Ness Road, 15/04348/FUL 23/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ruyton Xi Towns, Shropshire Land On North Side Of Whittington Road, 15/04473/REM 13/04/2018 41 0 41 25 16 41 0 0 Gobowen, Oswestry, Shropshire Hart And Trumpet, Station Road, Gobowen, 15/04664/FUL 09/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 3JS Proposed Residential Development Land East Of 15/04690/REM 29/07/2016 46 13 33 33 0 0 Kingfisher Way, Morda , Shropshire

A29 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development To The South 15/04968/REM 16/01/2015 18 0 18 18 0 0 Of Fernhill Lane, Gobowen, Shropshire

Land Including Storage Buildings/Offices, Argoed 16/00902/REM 17/06/2016 18 6 12 12 0 0 Road, Kinnerley , Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 8DH 16/01018/REM Old Piggery, Park Hall, Shropshire , SY11 4AX 22/08/2016 44 8 36 36 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land At 16/01094/REM 01/02/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Maesbury Marsh, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land To The 16/01593/REM 21/10/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 East Of Upper Church Street, Oswestry, Shropshire Land At The Grove , Penygarreg Lane, Pant, 16/01667/REM 22/09/2016 2 1 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 8JS Land South Of Aspen Grange, Weston Rhyn, 16/01735/OUT 21/12/2017 32 0 32 32 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of Eastwood, Wern, 16/02596/OUT 19/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Weston Rhyn, Shropshire Rushey Leasowes, Pentre, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/02740/FUL 14/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY4 1BS 16/02952/FUL 39 Cabin Lane, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 2LS 06/09/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 8A St. Martins Moor, St. Martins, Oswestry, SY10 16/03136/REM 14/06/2017 2 1 1 1 0 0 7BQ Land Adjoining 8A, St. Martins Moor, St. Martins, 16/03137/REM 14/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Oswestry, SY10 7BQ 16/03269/FUL 55 Salop Road, Oswestry, SY11 2RG 25/10/2016 6 0 6 6 0 0 16/03308/FUL 56 Hammonds Place, Gobowen, SY11 3PA 28/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adjacent To Mandolin, Pant, Oswestry, 16/03618/FUL 12/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8LB Proposed Dwelling Adjacent South Lodge Off 16/03675/REM 10/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Burma Road, Park Hall, Shropshire Agricultural Buildings At Llynclys Hall Farm, 16/03811/FUL 22/11/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Sweeney, Shropshire The Smithfield Hotel, 1 Salop Road, Oswestry, SY11 16/04426/FUL 14/03/2017 7 0 7 7 0 0 2NR Proposed Residential Development Opposite 16/04719/FUL 14/03/2019 18 0 18 18 0 0 School, Kinnerley, Shropshire 16/04778/FUL Land Off Daisy Lane, Whittington, Shropshire 22/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

Land Adjoining Croft Cottage, Moors Lane, St 16/04860/REM 26/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Martins Moor, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 7BQ Proposed Residential Development 16/05105/FUL Off Oswalds Place, Oswalds Well Lane, Oswestry, 21/02/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire, SY11 2TF 16/05110/FUL Land West Of Burma Road, Park Hall, Shropshire 26/02/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Land East Of Barley Meadows, Llanymynech, 16/05302/REM 15/05/2017 35 18 17 17 17 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land At The 16/05336/REM 19/02/2018 25 0 25 25 0 0 Cross, West Felton, Shropshire 16/05552/REM Tilings, Whittington Road, Gobowen, SY11 3NA 06/08/2017 15 0 15 15 0 0 Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Police House, Quinta 16/05585/FUL 26/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Crescent, Weston Rhyn, Shropshire Former Nursery Site, High Street, Weston Rhyn, 16/05811/FUL 15/02/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 SY10 7RP Gledrid Farm , Gledrid, Chirk, Wrexham , Shropshire, 16/05823/FUL 11/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 LL14 5DG Proposed Affordable Dwelling To The North Of 17/00117/FUL 14/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Maesbrook, Shropshire

A30 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Building North Of Henbarns Farm, Haughton, West 17/00248/FUL 27/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Felton, Shropshire Dallas, 32 Upper Church Street, Oswestry, SY11 17/00603/FUL 06/04/2017 8 0 8 8 0 0 2AE Proposed Residential Development Land West Of 17/00631/FUL Greenpastures, Weston Lane, Oswestry, 13/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent 1 Police Houses, St 17/00703/FUL 13/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Martins Road, Gobowen, Shropshire Land Adjacent To No. 4 Hindford, Hindford , 17/01017/FUL 16/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Whittington, Shropshire The Elms, Middleton, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 17/01399/OUT 04/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 4LT Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Sunnybank, Old 17/01422/FUL 16/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whittington Road, Gobowen Proposed Dwelling Adj The Meadows, Broomhall 17/02117/FUL 21/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Oswestry, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land, NW Of 17/02616/FUL 26/01/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Bower Farm, St Martins, Shropshire Adjacent Plas Cerrig, (Plot 4), Wern, Weston Rhyn, 17/02631/FUL 23/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Walnut Croft, By Pass Road, Gobowen, Oswestry, 17/02686/FUL 09/08/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, SY11 3JJ Highfawr Cottage, Racecourse Road, Oswestry, 17/02838/FUL 04/08/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 7PJ Queen Anne Coffee Lounge, 29A Bailey Street, 17/02902/FUL 10/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1PX Carpenters Shed , Halston Hall, Whittington, 17/03363/FUL 23/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry , Shropshire, SY11 4NS Land (Plot 1) South Of Chapel Lane, Knockin Heath, 17/03446/FUL 16/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire Land (Plot 2) South Of Chapel Lane, Knockin Heath, 17/03447/FUL 16/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire Land (Plot 3) South Of Chapel Lane, Knockin Heath, 17/03448/FUL 16/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/03638/FUL South Of Henry Robertson Drive, Gobowen, 04/07/2018 20 0 20 20 0 0 Shropshire 17/03677/REM, 17/03678/REM, 17/03679/REM, Land West Of Artillery Road, Park Hall , Shropshire 27/08/2014 30 0 30 30 0 0 17/03680/REM, and 17/03690/REM Proposed Residential Development Land South Of 17/03716/FUL 14/03/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Llys Hill, Middleton Road, Oswestry, Shropshire

Fach Farm House, Laburnum Cottage, Junction To 17/03835/FUL 09/03/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Fach, St Martins, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 3ET 3 Station Road, Whittington, Oswestry, Shropshire , 17/04114/FUL 02/11/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY11 4DA Land South Of Firbank, Gyrn Road, Selattyn, 17/04207/REM 13/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling East Of Sandstone Cottages, 17/04337/OUT 21/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Chapel Lane , Knockin Heath, Shropshire Land South East Of Rosedale, Maesbrook, 17/04401/FUL 17/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 8QN 17/04440/REM Land North Of River Tanat, Llanyblodwel, 04/11/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 15/01687/OUT Shropshire

A31 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling SE Of The Orchard , 17/04767/FUL 07/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Babbinswood, Whittington, Shropshire 17/04830/FUL 3 Church Street, Oswestry, SY11 2SU 11/01/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of Walnut Croft, By Pass 17/05003/OUT 06/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Gobowen, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions At Greenfields, 17/05019/FUL 23/01/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Maesbrook , Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion At Grange Farm, 17/05248/FUL 24/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Edgerley, Kinnerley, Shropshire New Dwelling Adjacent Tetherdown, Morda Close, 17/05568/FUL 16/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire Land Adjacent Bryn Derw, Upper Chirk Bank, Chirk 17/06032/FUL 08/03/2019 7 0 7 7 0 0 Bank, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development South Of 17/06047/FUL 15/03/2019 6 0 6 6 0 0 Clifton Villas, Queens Head, Shropshire New Dwellings Plots 3 & 4 South Of Moors Lane, St 17/06129/FUL 13/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Martins Moor, Shropshire Racing Stables At, Tedsmore Hall, Tedsmore, West 17/06151/FUL 30/05/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Felton, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 4HD

Proposed Residential Development Land Off 18/00018/OUT 07/11/2018 27 0 27 27 0 0 Southlands Avenue, Gobowen, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of 18/00035/REM Richmond, Little London Lane, Trefonen , 13/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Caravan Site North Of Gledrid Farm, 18/00056/FUL 27/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Gledrid, Chirk, Shropshire Holiday Barn, Old Forge House, Knockin, Oswestry, 18/00209/COU 16/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8HJ Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling North Of 18/00381/FUL 31/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 New Barns Farm, Trefonen, Oswestry, Shropshire

18/00519/OUT 1 Mayfields, Bankfields Lane, Kinnerley, SY10 8DF 17/07/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Lower House Farm, Knockin, Oswestry, Shropshire, 18/00939/REM 23/11/2018 17 0 17 17 0 0 SY10 8HJ 18/01055/FUL 15-15A Cross Street, Oswestry, SY11 2NF 02/07/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Residential Development Land Adj Willow Bank, 18/01436/FUL 16/07/2018 13 0 13 13 0 0 Hengoed, Shropshire Land West Of Homestead, Kinnerley Road, 18/01655/REM 25/06/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Knockin, Shropshire Development Land To The West Of Rockwell Lane, 18/01724/REM 06/03/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Pant , Shropshire The Summer House, Sychtyn, Trefonen, Oswestry, 18/02110/FUL 28/06/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 9EF Proposed Residential Development Adj Henlle Park 18/02123/REM 15/10/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 Golf Club, Chirk Road, Gobowen, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/02140/OUT 26/10/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 West Of Weston Lane, Oswestry, Shropshire

Premises Formerly Known As The Dining Rooms, 18/02750/FUL 25/10/2018 7 0 7 7 0 0 Welsh Walls, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1AW Earlshaw, Weston Rhyn, Oswestry, Shropshire, 18/02986/FUL 15/03/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY10 7RN 18/03269/FUL 37 Llanforda Rise, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1SY 12/11/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red House, Middleton Road, Middleton, Oswestry, 18/03729/FUL 06/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY11 4LT

A32 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 18/03771/FUL 81 Beatrice Street, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1HL 28/11/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 New House Farm, Pen-Y-Bryn, St Martins, 18/03879/FUL 08/02/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 3DS Outbuilding At Plas Cerrig Cottage, Plas Cerrig 18/04122/FUL 22/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Llanymynech, Shropshire, SY22 6LQ Barn To The East Of Ball Lane, Maesbury, 18/04207/FUL 15/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Conversion Of Barn North Of Bryn Benlli, Turners 18/04229/FUL 09/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Llynclys, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development To The North 18/04408/REM 28/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Of Tregarthen Lane, Pant, Shropshire Little Underhill, Racecourse Road, Oswestry, SY10 18/04648/FUL 07/11/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 7PN Severn Moorhens, Edgerley, Oswestry, Shropshire, 18/05137/OUT 15/02/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 SY10 8ES 18/05600/FUL 16B Bailey Street, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1PU 14/02/2019 4 0 4 4 0 0 Tegfryn, Tref-Ar-Clawdd, Oswestry, Shropshire, 18/05863/FUL 22/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY10 9DE Land Adjacent To 69 New Ifton, St Martins, 19/00061/REM 13/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 3AA Land To The North Of Riversdale Church 19/00560/OUT 27/03/2019 5 0 5 5 0 0 Street Ruyton Xi Towns Shropshire OS/01/11811/FUL Llynclys Hall Farm, Sweeney, Oswestry 09/08/2002 2 0 2 2 0 0 OS/04/13076/FUL 13 Oak Street, Oswestry 28/08/2008 24 0 24 24 0 0 OS/04/13131/REM Orchardside, Llynclys, Oswestry 16/04/2004 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adj Herschell House, Station Road, Whittington, OS/04/13172/FUL 09/06/2004 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry OS/04/13454/REM Adj Avondale, Ruyton XI Towns, Shrewsbury 17/11/2004 4 0 4 4 0 0 OS/04/13533/FUL Wernlas, Maesbrook, Oswestry 31/03/2005 1 0 1 1 0 0 Mount Pleasant, Ellesmere Road, St Martins, OS/05/13733/FUL 20/07/2005 6 0 6 6 0 0 Oswestry Lower Wykey Farm, Wykey, Ruyton XI Towns, OS/05/14101/FUL 19/12/2005 2 1 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 1JA OS/06/14210/FUL Daywell Farm, Daywall, Gobowen, Oswestry 30/03/2006 3 0 3 3 0 0 Pentre, Kendrick, Old Chirk Road, Weston Rhyn, OS/06/14398/FUL 26/06/2006 3 0 3 3 0 0 Oswestry OS/06/14437/FUL The Hollies, Kinnerley, Oswestry 25/07/2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS/07/15003/REM Land Off Morda Road, Oswestry 18/07/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Offa Cottage, Chapel Lane, Trefonen, OS/07/15243/FUL 13/11/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry Adj Anvic House, Rhoswiel, Weston Rhyn, OS/07/15325/REM 15/01/2008 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry OS/08/15427/FUL Land At Olden Lane, Ruyton XI Towns, Shrewsbury 21/05/2008 2 0 2 2 0 0 Babbinswood Farm, Berghill Lane, Whittington, OS/08/15765/FUL 26/11/2008 3 0 3 3 0 0 Oswestry OS/09/15915/FUL Part Enclosure, OS 2327, Knockin, Oswestry 11/03/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 OS/09/15927/FUL Little Trehowell, Chirk, Wrexham 17/03/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 OS1960/02853 Hawkstone Park, Whittington Road, Oswestry 30/12/1960 26 24 2 2 0 0 OS1992/08058 Plot 1&2, The Wern, Weston Rhyn 01/03/1993 2 1 1 1 0 0 OS1993/08125 Wykey House, Wykey, Ruyton XI Towns 01/04/1993 4 3 1 1 0 0 OS1994/08715 Brook House, Llanyblodwel 01/01/1995 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Affordable Dwelling NW Of Terrace 17/05333/FUL 15/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm, Cruckton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land To The North Of Hall Bank, Pontesbury, 17/05554/FUL 10/09/2018 86 9 77 38 38 1 77 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire

A33 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Breidden 17/05951/OUT Cottage, Shrewsbury Road, Pontesbury, 04/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Grinleys Cottage, Asterley, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, 18/00569/FUL 20/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of The 18/00705/FUL Warehouse, Pontesford Hill, Pontesbury, 09/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Wingfield Farm, Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, 18/01347/FUL 18/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling, North West Of 5 18/01778/FUL 21/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Plealey, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Plot Adjoining Dalewood, Shrewsbury Road, 18/02238/FUL 16/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of The 18/02297/FUL Warehouse, Pontesford Hill, Pontesbury, 18/01/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire 1 Nox Bank, Cruckton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 18/02793/FUL 21/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 8PT Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Breidden 18/03671/OUT Cottage, Shrewsbury Road, Pontesbury, 14/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Whiteladies Farm, Shackerley Lane, Cosford, 09/03465/FUL 12/01/2011 7 0 7 7 0 0 Shifnal 10/05055/FUL Red Hill Farm, Redhill, Shifnal 17/01/2011 7 3 4 4 0 0 Land Between Lawton Road And Stanton Road, 13/05136/OUT 03/02/2016 70 0 70 24 24 36 10 46 0 Shifnal, Shropshire Stockton Buildings , Stockton, Shifnal, Shropshire, 15/00390/COU 27/03/2015 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 TF11 9EF Land South Of A464, Wolverhampton Road, 15/00795/FUL 31/03/2016 7 6 1 1 0 0 Shifnal, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land, N Of 15/01390/REM 15/07/2015 184 117 67 36 31 67 0 0 Haughton Road, Shifnal , Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land, North Of 15/01741/REM 17/08/2015 216 117 99 54 45 99 0 0 Haughton Road , Shifnal, Shropshire

15/03337/FUL 6 Brookside Close, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 8HN 12/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0

Land West Of Coppice Green Lane, Shifnal , 15/03807/REM 06/11/2015 200 174 26 26 26 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions At Chadwell Court, 15/04034/FUL 14/03/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Chadwell , Newport, Shropshire

16/00646/REM Development Land North East Of Stone Drive, 03/02/2016 249 56 192 52 54 54 32 192 0 0 17/05982/REM Shifnal, Shropshire 25/05/2016 27/03/2018 Tudor Court, Aston Road, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 16/02315/FUL 05/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 8DU Proposed Dwelling Adjacent 22 Park Lane, Shifnal , 16/03128/FUL 06/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF11 9HD Coach House Flat, Haughton Grange, Haughton 17/01001/FUL 23/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Village, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 8HR Barn At Village Farm, Sheriffhales, Shifnal, 17/01145/FUL 20/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF11 8RD Proposed Dwelling, North East Of Park Farm , 17/02636/FUL 12/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton Road, Shifnal, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development SE Of 17/03311/FUL Kemberton Cottage, Mill Lane, Kemberton, Shifnal, 13/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 17/03387/COU Anvil Inn, 22 Aston Road, Shifnal, TF11 8DU 22/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

A34 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling At Redhill Stud, Crackleybank, 17/04653/FUL 14/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Sheriffhales, Shropshire Land At Corner Of Church Street , Shifnal, 17/05593/FUL 21/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF11 9AB Land To The Rear Of Tudor Court, Aston Road, 17/06101/FUL 22/03/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 8DU Proposed Dwelling On The West Of Park Lane, 18/00171/OUT 26/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shifnal, Shropshire Land Between Lawton Road And Stanton Road, 18/00726/REM 14/05/2018 99 11 88 36 36 16 88 0 0 Shifnal, Shropshire Village Farm Lodge, Sheriffhales, Shropshire, TF11 18/00877/FUL 24/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 8RD Proposed Residential Conversion, The Uplands, 18/02822/FUL Wolverhampton Road, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 14/11/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 9HA 18/03993/FUL Stables At Tong Forge, Shifnal, Shropshire 01/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 New Dwelling, Adjacent 33 Park Lane, Shifnal, 18/04722/FUL 10/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF11 9HD BR/APP/FUL/06/0208 Land Opp 3 Shrewsbury Road, Shifnal 23/05/2006 3 0 3 3 0 0 BR/APP/FUL/07/0910 7 Shrewsbury Road, Shifnal 21/12/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land At Lower Newton Farm, Yockleton, 09/02275/REM 04/12/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury 09/02371/FUL The Gables, Cross Houses, Shrewsbury 23/10/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 Adj T0 Lornicera, Marche Lane, Halfway House, 09/03094/FUL 21/12/2009 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury 10/00564/FUL Builders Yard, Red Barn Lane, Shrewsbury 22/12/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Daisyfields, Marche Lane, Halfway House, 10/01008/FUL 06/05/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury 10/03237/OUT Flax Mill, St Michaels Street, Shrewsbury 05/11/2010 120 0 120 15 38 38 91 29 29 0 10/04564/COU 22 - 24 Frankwell, Shrewsbury 13/12/2010 2 1 1 1 0 0 10/05075/FUL Yeaton Manor, Yeaton, Baschurch, Shrewsbury 17/01/2011 4 0 4 4 0 0 10/05179/FUL The Poplars, Great Ness, Shrewsbury 04/03/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/05192/FUL Wheatley Farm, Battlefield, Shrewsbury 15/02/2011 2 0 2 2 0 0 10/05490/FUL Bramleys Milford Road, Baschurch, Shrewsbury 17/06/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 St Davids Presbyterian Church, Belmont Bank, 11/00696/FUL 03/05/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury 11/00763/FUL Coton Hill Farm, Corporation Lane, Shrewsbury 21/06/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 11/01017/FUL Downton Farm, Upton Magna, Shrewsbury 07/06/2011 13 0 13 13 0 0 Adj To Gains Cottage, Welshpool Road, Bicton 11/02564/FUL 01/09/2011 1 0 1 1 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury Land At Former Water Tower, Wilcot Avenue, 11/02568/FUL 13/06/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Wilcott, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 11/05365/FUL Shrubbery Farm, Hinton, Shrewsbury, SY5 9PZ 26/09/2013 2 1 1 1 0 0 Land Adj 2 Moorland Cottages, Station Road, 12/00074/FUL 30/05/2013 11 0 11 11 0 0 Baschurch, Shrewsbury Barn At Middle, Shadymoor Farm, Dorrington, 12/01210/FUL 24/07/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury 12/01278/FUL Lees Farm, Walcott, Telford, Shropshire, TF6 5ER 30/04/2015 6 0 6 6 0 0 Windy Ridge, Alderton , Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 12/01317/FUL 26/08/2014 2 1 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 1AP Lower House Farm, Off B4386, Yockleton, 12/01959/FUL 07/03/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 9PZ Land Adj 1 The Cottages, Hopton , Nesscliffe, 12/02933/FUL 16/07/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land South Of Myrtle Cottage , Ford Heath , 12/03524/FUL 29/08/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire

A35 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land Adj 1 Quarry View, Cound, Shrewsbury, 12/03671/FUL 18/02/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 6EL Land NW Of Dinthill Farm , Ford, Shrewsbury, 12/03968/OUT 13/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 12/04567/FUL Home Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury 20/12/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 13/00471/REM Adj To 94 London Road, Shrewsbury 29/05/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ryton Grange, Longnor, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 13/00651/FUL 28/02/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY5 7LW 13/00893/FUL Sutton Grange, Oteley Road, Shrewsbury, SY2 6QL 09/05/2014 291 144 147 38 38 38 33 147 0 0 Fitz Farm, Mytton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire , SY4 13/01024/FUL 02/09/2015 4 0 4 4 0 0 3AS Land Adj Grafton House, Grafton, Shrewsbury, 13/01108/FUL 05/07/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire 1 Orchard Lane, Hanwood , Shrewsbury, 13/01170/FUL 16/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 8LE The Cock Inn, Hanwood , Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 13/02067/FUL 10/09/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY5 8LJ Land Adjacent The Brewery, Longden Coleham , 13/02425/FUL 09/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Old Estate Yeard, Sundorne Castle, Uffington, 13/02861/FUL 16/09/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury Land At Oakleigh, Eyton Lane, Baschurch, 13/03053/REM 25/09/2013 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury Bings Heath Farm , Bings Heath, Shrewsbury, SY4 13/03158/FUL 21/02/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 4BZ Old Bush Inn, 141 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury , 13/03309/FUL 26/01/2016 8 1 6 6 0 0 SY2 6AP Outbuildings Adjacent Oaks Cottages, The Oaks, 13/03463/FUL 07/04/2014 3 0 3 3 0 0 Wrentall , Shrewsbury, Shropshire 13/04318/FUL St. Chads Farm, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 1DG 10/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Cottage NW Of Whitton Grange, Westbury, 13/04549/FUL 08/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire The Orchard School , Halfway House, Shrewsbury, 13/04654/FUL 16/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Welshpool, Shropshire, SY21 8EW Lower Wigmore Farm ,Wigmore Lane, Halfway 13/04666/FUL 24/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 House, Shrewsbury , SY5 9DZ Bicton Hall, Bicton Lane , Bicton, Shrewsbury, SY3 13/04790/FUL 24/04/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 8EU Land Adj Creden , Oteley Road, Shrewsbury, 13/04844/OUT 16/07/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY2 6QH 138 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 13/05057/COU 02/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 6AP Land Adjacent To Condover Fishing Pools, 14/00155/FUL 02/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Condover Park, Condover , Shrewsbury, Shropshire The Fox Inn, Ryton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 14/00392/FUL 24/02/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 7LS Old Three Pigeons, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, SY4 14/00412/FUL 16/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 1DB Land Adj Chronicle House, Chester Street, 14/00582/FUL 12/12/2014 11 6 5 5 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY1 2DJ Mulberry Field , Great Ness, Shrewsbury, 14/00694/OUT 24/09/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Gables Farm Bungalow, Uffington , Shrewsbury, 14/00882/FUL 06/05/2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 4SE Former Stanwardine Methodist Chapel, 14/01187/FUL Stanwardine In The Fields , Baschurch, Ellesmere, 07/08/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 2HA

A36 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 4 Felton Butler Cottages, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 14/01327/OUT 07/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 1AS Garage Opposite The Rope Walk, Lyth Hill , 14/01384/FUL 28/07/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Hall Farm, Summerhouse Lane, Longden , 14/01458/FUL 08/12/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 8HA Proposed Residential Development Land At 14/01945/FUL 10/04/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Wilcott , Shrewsbury, Shropshire 14/02116/FUL Vine Cottage, Uffington, Shrewsbury, SY4 4SN 04/03/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of The Firs, Exfords 14/02230/OUT 18/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Green, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 14/02454/OUT Land Off Station Road, Baschurch , Shropshire 03/12/2015 40 0 40 40 0 0 Manor Farm, Preston Gubbals , Shrewsbury, SY4 14/02661/FUL 10/12/2014 4 0 4 4 0 0 3AN Garages At Former Meb Substation, Copthorne 14/02779/FUL 05/03/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land At Ness Strange , Great Ness, Nesscliffe , 14/03166/FUL 24/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Barn At Walford House, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 14/03421/FUL 17/12/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development South Of 14/03844/REM 11/12/2014 425 277 148 57 57 34 148 0 0 Mytton Oak Road , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Earth Sheltered Eco Dwelling At Hopton, 14/03858/FUL 02/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj Crosshills, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 14/04067/FUL 17/06/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Development Land To The South Of Oteley Road, 14/04428/OUT 23/06/2015 386 0 386 38 57 76 76 247 90 49 139 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Windmill Farm, Rowton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 14/04630/VAR 28/05/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 SY5 9EJ Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Silverdale , Stretton 14/04662/FUL 14/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 8 Claremont Bank, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 14/05563/FUL 02/03/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 1RW 3/4 & 5 The Square, The Fold, Dorrington, 15/00036/FUL 28/07/2015 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 7JF Proposed Dwelling East Of The Limes , Limes 15/00156/OUT 07/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Paddock, Dorrington , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of Yew Tree Cottage, 15/00460/OUT 07/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Valeswood, Little Ness, Shropshire Development South Of Laburnum Cottage, 15/00493/FUL 07/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Prescott Road, Prescott , Baschurch, Shropshire Calluna Station Road, Baschurch, Baschurch, Nr 15/00538/FUL 06/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 2BB Boreatton Hall , Boreatton , Baschurch, Shrewsbury, 15/00586/FUL 01/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 2EP Mytton Hall , Mytton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire , SY4 15/00636/FUL 29/04/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 1EU Development Site Off, Shillingston Drive, Berwick 15/00673/REM 25/06/2015 230 205 25 25 25 0 0 Grange, Shrewsbury Development Land At Mousecroft Lane/Longden 15/00779/REM 26/10/2015 171 103 68 38 30 68 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj 109 Lyth Hill Road, Bayston Hill , 15/01106/FUL 25/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire The Chapel, Well Lane, Hopton, Shrewsbury, SY4 15/01235/OUT 03/05/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 1DH

A37 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land North Of Kinton Grange, Kinton , Shrewsbury, 15/01253/FUL 30/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Stoney Lee, Ford Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire , 15/01338/OUT 06/07/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 SY5 9GQ Proposed Residential Development Land To The 15/01684/OUT 12/08/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 South Of Annscroft, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Rosedale, Wollaston, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 15/01692/FUL 21/04/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 9DS Enterprise House, Holywell Street , Shrewsbury, 15/01868/FUL 27/07/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY2 5DB 2 The Crescent, Bomere Heath, Shrewsbury, 15/02276/FUL 21/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 3PQ Stable North Of The Hollies, Weston Lullingfields, 15/02282/FUL 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 15/02536/FUL 36 Castle Street , Shrewsbury, Shropshire , SY1 2BW 02/10/2015 5 0 5 5 0 0 15/03231/FUL The Stables, Leighton, Shropshire 20/10/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Home Farm, Pulverbatch, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 15/03481/FUL 12/11/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY5 8DS Development Land Adjacent The Old Shop, 15/03628/REM 19/10/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Halfway House, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Workshop North East Of The Rope Walk, Lyth Hill, 15/03651/FUL 19/02/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Off Telford Way, Opposite Footbridge, 15/03894/FUL 18/01/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 Telford Way, Shrewsbury , Shropshire New Dwelling To Rear Of 98 London Road , London 15/04206/FUL 13/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion Adjacent Holly Bush 15/04310/FUL 13/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottage, Shoothill, Ford, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land South West Of Longden Common, 15/04542/FUL 30/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development West Of Bryn 15/04627/REM 17/03/2016 20 13 7 7 0 0 Road, The Mount, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Hilley Farm, Pentre, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 15/04703/FUL 01/09/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 1BP Hilley Farm, Pentre, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 15/04704/FUL 22/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 1BP Land West Of 18 The Mount , Shrewsbury, 15/04731/FUL 23/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Buildings At Albion Hayes Farm, Bomere Heath, 15/04916/FUL 13/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling, South Of Pen-Y-Pont, 15/05284/REM 05/02/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hookagate, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Albrightlee House, Albrightlee, Shrewsbury, 15/05292/FUL Shropshire, SY4 4EE 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0

Land To The West Of Battlefield Road , Shrewsbury, 15/05337/OUT 08/09/2016 100 0 100 25 38 37 100 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling At Former Shelton Hospital, 15/05530/FUL Welshpool Road, Bicton Heath, Shrewsbury, 13/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 8DN Barn To The North East Of Manor Farm, Preston 16/00143/FUL 27/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Gubbals , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land South Of Holcroft Way, Cross Houses, 16/00188/REM 08/06/2016 35 11 24 24 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj. To Holcroft Way, Cross Houses, 16/00189/REM 16/09/2015 30 0 30 30 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Kingston House , Forton Bank, Montford Bridge, 16/00314/REM 04/04/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 1ER

A38 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwellings At Wilcot, Kinton, Shrewsbury, 16/00327/REM 09/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire 16/00434/FUL 23A Wyle Cop, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 1XB 22/03/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0

Proposed Development Land West Of Nesscliffe 16/00670/REM 26/05/2017 10 0 10 10 0 0 Hotel , Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 107 Rowton Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 16/00706/FUL 24/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 6JA Lower Trefnant Farm, Winnington, Halfway House, 16/00714/FUL 24/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9DL Mytton Mill, Forton Heath, Montford Bridge, 16/00725/FUL 28/02/2017 12 0 12 12 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY4 1HA The Haughmond, Pelham Road, Upton Magna, 16/00818/FUL 10/05/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , SY4 4TZ Proposed Residential Development, East Of 16/01008/REM Welbatch Farm, Hookagate, Shrewsbury, 03/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Development Land Adj The Old School , Cardeston , 16/01009/REM 18/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land At Jubilee Farm, Church Road, Dorrington, 16/01122/REM 07/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , SY5 7JL Land At Jubilee Farm, Church Road, Dorrington, 16/01123/REM 30/03/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , SY5 7JL Land Adj. 1B Racecourse Avenue, Shrewsbury, 16/01383/FUL 17/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 18-20 Castle Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 16/01752/FUL 19/09/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 2AZ Rear Of Manor Farm, Preston Gubbals, 16/01849/FUL 10/08/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 3AN 16/01988/OUT 9 Arden Close, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 5YP 04/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling North Of 18 Valeswood, Little 16/02032/OUT 23/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ness, Shropshire Plot 1 Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/02219/FUL Limes Paddock, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 15/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 2 Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/02220/FUL Limes Paddock, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 15/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 3 Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/02222/FUL Limes Paddock, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 15/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 4 Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/02223/FUL Limes Paddock, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 15/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Plot 5 Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/02225/FUL Limes Paddock, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 15/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 9 - 10 Castle Gates, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 16/02312/FUL 07/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 2AE Land East Of Shamrock Cottage, Cross Lane, 16/02343/FUL 12/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bayston Hill , Shrewsbury, Shropshire 16/02361/REM Land At Wilcott, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 01/11/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 16/02448/REM 16/02449/REM Development Adj Jubilee Gardens, Westbury, 30/03/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 16/02450/REM Shrewsbury, Shropshire 16/02451/REM Land At Weeping Cross South Of Oteley Road, 16/02618/FUL 19/12/2016 159 44 115 38 38 38 1 115 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Oteley Island, Oteley Road , Shrewsbury, 16/02636/FUL 07/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY2 6QP

A39 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land Adj Manor Field, Uffington, Shrewsbury, 16/02931/FUL 25/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Barn Opposite Fenemere Manor, Milford Road, 16/02961/FUL 13/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Baschurch, Shropshire , SY4 2JG Land To The South Of Cross Houses, Shrewsbury, 16/03210/FUL 22/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Barns At Winnington Lodge Farm, 16/03221/FUL 20/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Winnington, Westbury, Shropshire Stapleton Grange , Longden, Shrewsbury, 16/03278/FUL 21/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 8HF Land North Of The Red Lion , Longden Common, 16/03312/OUT 28/09/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Development Land Opposite The Crescent , 16/03413/REM 15/02/2016 24 8 16 16 0 0 Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Beechwood House, Belmont Bank, Shrewsbury, 16/03432/FUL 11/05/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 SY1 1UB Land North East Of Vine Cottage , Uffington , 16/03436/FUL 27/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South Of Condover House, 16/03480/FUL 08/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Condover , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land West Of Mulberry House , Great Ryton, 16/03488/REM 13/10/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire , SY5 7LW Holland Broadbridge Agriculture House, 5 Barker 16/03659/FUL 27/02/2017 10 0 10 10 0 0 Street, Shrewsbury, SY1 1QJ Oak Cottage, Hanwood Road, Shrewsbury, 16/03825/FUL 05/12/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 8NT Proposed Affordable Dwelling, Westbury, 16/03879/FUL 14/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire New Dwelling Plot 1 At Hunkington Nurseries, 16/03945/OUT 28/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Walford Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

New Dwelling Plot 2 At Hunkington Nurseries, 16/03946/OUT 28/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Walford Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 2HT Goosehill, Bowbrook, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 16/03987/FUL 05/01/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 8PG Wilcot House , Wilcott, Shrewsbury , Shropshire, 16/04075/VAR 13/12/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY4 1BJ Barn At Walford House, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 16/04126/FUL 24/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling East Of Little Ness Village Hall , 16/04146/FUL 14/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Little Ness, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 16/04203/REM Development Land Adj Highfield, Orchard Lane , 27/01/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 17/03436/REM Hanwood, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 15/09/2017 Proposed Dwelling West Of Ryton Villa Court, Little 16/04232/REM 31/10/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ryton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 16/04233/OUT Land South Of Mytton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 09/01/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0

Westside Workshops, Welshpool Road, Bicton 16/04328/FUL 04/04/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8HA Land At 117/125 Wenlock Road, Shrewsbury, 16/04590/FUL 24/11/2017 32 0 32 32 0 0 Shropshire Land And Barn At Betton Abbots Farm, Betton 16/04591/FUL 02/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Abbots, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land North Of West View Main Road , Dorrington , 16/04693/FUL 16/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Site Opposite Walford Heath Nurseries, Walford 16/04720/REM 08/12/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 1 Mill Cottages, Hanwood, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/04743/FUL 27/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY5 8NA

A40 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 18-20 Castle Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 16/04780/FUL 12/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 2AZ Radbrook Hall Court, Radbrook Road, Shrewsbury, 16/04883/FUL 06/09/2017 10 0 10 10 0 0 Shropshire Land East Of The Wheat House , Ryton, Dorrington, 16/04969/FUL 25/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Outbuilding At Saltbox Cottage, Forton Heath, 16/05007/FUL 23/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land To The North Of Copthorne Road, 16/05179/FUL 05/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land At The Shrewsbury Club, Sundorne Road, 16/05214/REM 14/02/2017 20 13 7 7 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire Land At Weston Common , Weston Lullingfields, 16/05311/REM 17/05/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire Barns At Bridge Farm, Uffington, Shrewsbury, 16/05383/FUL 19/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 4ST Marycourt, 10 Kennedy Road, Shrewsbury, 16/05548/FUL 13/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 7AD Land Adj 1 Ruyton Road, Little Ness, Shrewsbury, 16/05558/FUL 06/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land West Of Home Farm, Little Ness, Shrewsbury, 16/05637/OUT 21/02/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Former Shelton Hospital, Welshpool Road, Bicton 16/05797/FUL 02/05/2017 12 0 12 12 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development South Of 16/05818/FUL Laburnum Cottage, Prescott Road, Prescott, 02/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Baschurch, Shropshire Land Adj Harry Hotspur , Harlescott Lane , 16/05819/OUT 18/05/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land North Of The Cottage, Lower Common, 17/00130/FUL 17/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Longden, Shropshire 17/00196/COU 5 Claremont Bank, Shrewsbury, SY1 1RW 24/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Westley House Farm, Hem Lane, Westley, 17/00207/FUL Minsterley, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 14/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY5 0AL Proposed Residential Development Land Adj 17/00282/FUL 27/06/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Crosshills, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury , Shropshire

17/00324/FUL 39 St Johns Hill , Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 1JQ 26/04/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Land East Of The White House, Exfords Green, 17/00531/REM 11/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land North Of The Red Lion , Longden Common, 17/00558/REM 19/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj Talwern Cottage, Weston Lullingfields, 17/00576/REM 29/06/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling West Of The White House, 17/00700/FUL 14/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Exfords Green, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land To West Of Shrewsbury Road, Bomere Heath, 17/00768/REM 26/05/2017 34 13 21 21 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Radbrook Centre Radbrook Road, Shrewsbury, 17/00821/REM 11/09/2017 104 10 94 38 38 18 94 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 9BJ Radbrook Campus, College Gardens, Shrewsbury, 17/00822/REM 11/09/2017 22 0 22 22 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 17/00862/OUT Pyepit Cottages, Condover, Shrewsbury, 20/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Land, 17/00863/OUT 26/05/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Condover , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Plas Newydd, 34 Hereford Road, Belle Vue, 17/00877/COU 21/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY3 7RD

A41 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 17/00898/FUL 9 Roushill , Shrewsbury, SY1 1PQ 11/05/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Proposed Dwelling, Warehouse, Longner Street, 17/01108/FUL 25/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8QS The Red Lion Inn, 32 Shrewsbury Road, Bomere 17/01120/FUL 26/05/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, SY4 3PD Residential Development Site, Land Off Falkland 17/01181/FUL Road, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 19/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 7DX 17/01231/FUL Kempsfield Primrose Drive, Shrewsbury, SY3 7TP 10/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Priory House, Priory Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 17/01433/FUL 21/06/2017 6 0 6 6 0 0 SY1 1RU Salop Leisure Ltd, Emstrey Bank, Atcham, 17/01559/FUL 25/08/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 6QS Proposed Residential Development Opposite The 17/01576/REM 20/04/2018 43 0 43 43 0 0 Crescent , Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Between Preston Street & London Road, 17/01612/OUT 08/08/2018 600 0 600 25 50 90 90 90 345 90 90 180 75 75 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Car Park And 17/01697/OUT 12/02/2019 48 0 48 48 0 0 Premises, Old Coleham, Shrewsbury, SY3 7BP 17/01742/FUL 84 Belle Vue Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7NH 25/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Marcheville, Marche Lane, Halfway House, 17/01779/FUL 28/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY5 9DE Meole Brace Hall, Church Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 17/01796/FUL 16/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 9HF North West Of 21 Merlin Road, Shrewsbury , 17/01807/FUL 22/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire South Of Westside, Welshpool Road , Bicton Heath , 17/01851/FUL 28/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire South Of Westside , Welshpool Road, Bicton Heath, 17/01858/FUL 28/06/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj 109 Lyth Hill Road, Bayston Hill, 17/01918/FUL 28/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Stapleton, 17/01920/FUL 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/01942/FUL Adj 84 Comet Drive, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 04/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 17/01958/FUL 6 Pengwern Road , Shrewsbury, SY3 8JD 29/09/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Adj Station Bungalow, Ford, Shrewsbury, 17/02154/OUT 06/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land To The East Of Woodhouse Cottages, 17/02170/OUT Longden Common, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 14/07/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 8AF Shropshire Stone & Granite, Station Road , 17/02174/REM 28/02/2019 48 0 48 12 36 48 0 0 Baschurch, Shrewsbury, SY4 2BQ Land To Rear Of Number 155 Abbey Foregate, 17/02230/FUL 11/07/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 6AP Land Adj 2 Spring Cottages, Hookagate, 17/02316/OUT 03/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/02538/FUL Ness Strange, Great Ness, Shropshire, SY4 2LE 29/11/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0

Proposed Dwelling East Of Creden, Oteley Road, 17/02751/OUT 09/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire H M Prison, The Dana, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 17/02809/OUT 14/09/2017 107 0 107 38 57 12 107 0 0 2HR Proposed Residential Development Land West Of 17/02810/FUL 03/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hafod , Weston Lullingfields, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The North Of Gorse Lane, 17/02886/FUL 08/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bayston Hill , Shrewsbury, Shropshire

A42 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Racecourse 17/02909/FUL 08/09/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Shrewsbury , Shropshire 17/02954/REM Land North Of Milford Road, Baschurch, Shropshire 13/12/2017 34 14 20 20 0 0 Proposed Conversion, Outbuilding At Cound 17/03171/FUL 02/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cottage, Cound, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Rosemount Cottage, 1 Canonbury, Shrewsbury, 17/03372/FUL 19/01/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 SY3 7AG 24 Valeswood, Little Ness, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 17/03473/FUL 04/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY4 2LH The Castle Inn, Old Coleham, Shrewsbury, 17/03689/FUL 15/12/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire , SY3 7BU 17/03865/FUL Land North Of A458, Ford, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 16/07/2018 32 0 32 32 0 0 Land North Of Jubilee Farm, Church Road, 17/03920/FUL 22/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Dorrington, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land East Of Jessamine Cottage, Walford Heath, 17/04073/FUL 08/01/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 1st Floor, 24 Castle Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 17/04095/FUL 02/11/2017 6 0 6 6 0 0 SY1 2BQ Land North Of 4 Shepherds Lane , Bicton Heath, 17/04219/REM 14/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Abbey Court, Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, SY2 17/04223/FUL 03/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 6UA 17/04343/FUL 10 Roushill Bank, Shrewsbury, SY1 1PN 01/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land SW Of 17/04465/FUL Montpelier House, Alton Terrace, Belle Vue Road, 19/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire First Floor Flat, Bowdlers House, Town Walls, 17/04493/FUL 23/11/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 1TP Little Ness Manor, Little Ness, Shrewsbury, 17/04540/FUL 03/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 2LG Proposed Barn Conversions At Bayston Farm, 17/04556/FUL 06/04/2018 6 2 4 4 0 0 Burgs Lane, Bayston Hill, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Davies Memorials, 94 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, 17/04610/OUT 23/11/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 SY3 7HS Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04614/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04616/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04617/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04618/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04619/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04620/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04621/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04622/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

A43 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development East Of Wilcot 17/04623/REM 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/04760/FUL 68 Mardol , Shrewsbury, SY1 1PZ 09/02/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Harlyn, Pulley Lane, Bayston Hill, Shrewsbury , SY3 17/04769/OUT 21/03/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 0JH 5 Swiss Farm Road, Shrewsbury , Shropshire, SY3 17/04817/FUL 14/12/2017 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 8XB Proposed Dwelling West Of 24 Valeswood , Little 17/04956/REM 05/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ness, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North Of 3 Pyepit Cottages, 17/04957/FUL 28/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Condover , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Coton Hill Glass Works , Coton Hill , Shrewsbury, 17/05049/FUL 29/11/2017 9 0 9 9 0 0 Shropshire, SY1 2DP Land To Rear Of Sutton Farm Shopping Centre, 17/05113/OUT 22/12/2017 6 0 6 6 0 0 Tilstock Crescent , Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling South Of 170 Monkmoor Road , 17/05163/FUL 12/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Mixed Use Development Barker Street, 17/05171/FUL 02/03/2018 25 22 3 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire Land Off Greenfields Recreation Ground, Falstaff 17/05234/FUL 08/11/2018 15 0 15 15 0 0 Street, Shrewsbury Heathgates Works, 67A Ditherington Road, 17/05255/OUT 21/12/2017 8 0 8 8 0 0 Shrewsbury , SY1 4BD Proposed Care Home, Shillingston Drive, Berwick 17/05325/OUT 09/07/2018 47 0 47 47 0 0 Grange, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Former Shelton Hospital, Somerby Drive, 17/05329/VAR 02/07/2015 235 186 49 49 49 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8DN Proposed Local Needs Dwelling SE Of Lawnswood, 17/05409/FUL 05/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wattlesborough, Halfway House, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The East Of 1 Westwood 17/05428/FUL 30/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drive, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj Clan Keith Stables, Valeswood, Little 17/05437/FUL 12/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ness, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 2LH Proposed Dwelling Adj Laburnum Cottage , 17/05459/REM 18/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wattlesborough, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/05472/FUL Former Methodist Church, Melverley, Shropshire 04/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Richard Onslow Court, Hearne Way, 17/05588/FUL 18/04/2018 8 0 8 8 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/05601/OUT 1 Glenburn Gardens, Shrewsbury, SY2 5SY 20/02/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Barn Cottages, Red Barn Lane, Shrewsbury, 17/05639/FUL 16/02/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 7HR Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/05772/OUT 04/01/2019 36 0 36 36 0 0 West Of Ellesmere Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/06053/FUL 117 Wenlock Road, Shrewsbury, SY2 6JX 16/05/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 The Oaks, Preston Gubbals Road, Bomere Heath, 17/06061/FUL 16/03/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 3LU Bowbridge House, Bowbrook, Shrewsbury, 17/06096/OUT 11/03/2019 6 0 6 6 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 8PG Proposed Residential Development Between 17/06135/FUL Mousecroft Lane And Longden Road, Shrewsbury , 29/03/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 Shropshire Development Land To The South Of Oteley Road, 17/06149/REM 16/04/2018 164 0 164 38 38 38 38 12 164 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land East Of Wilcot Lane, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 18/00060/FUL 11/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire

A44 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Land South Of 166 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, 18/00203/REM 26/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Opposite 41 18/00240/REM 08/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Hawthorn Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Adj. Hawthorn Cottage, Longden, 18/00251/FUL 04/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Former Railway Land Off Washford Road, 18/00268/FUL 12/06/2018 7 0 7 7 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY3 9HR Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling E Of 18/00273/OUT Welbatch Farm, Hookagate, Shrewsbury, 15/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Residential Development, Land To The 18/00287/FUL 26/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 North East Of Hookagate, Shrewsbury, Shropshire

Proposed Residential Development, Land To The 18/00294/FUL 26/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 North East Of Hookagate, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Preston Farmhouse, Preston, Shrewsbury, 18/00363/FUL 06/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 4TB The Red Barn, 108 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, 18/00472/FUL 17/04/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 7HS Land North Of 35 Shrewsbury Road, Bomere 18/00487/FUL 25/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Salop Music Centre , St Michaels Street, 18/00501/FUL 18/10/2018 32 0 32 32 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY1 2DE Mereside Butchers, 33 Mereside, Shrewsbury, 18/00553/FUL 05/04/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY2 6LF 18/00575/FUL 71 Mardol, Shrewsbury, SY1 1PZ 19/04/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 18/00583/FUL 3 Oak Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 7RH 13/04/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Plot 2 South Of Quarry House, Hopton, Nesscliffe, 18/00658/FUL 12/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land Off Forton Bank, Montford Bridge, 18/00710/REM 06/07/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Vashlyn, Woodfield Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 18/00816/VAR 14/05/2015 4 0 4 4 0 0 SY3 8LU Land Adj. 34 Dale Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 18/00892/FUL 23/04/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY2 5TE Congregational Church, Swan Hill, Shrewsbury, SY1 18/01053/FUL 07/06/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 1NL Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Lythfield, Annscroft, 18/01118/FUL 21/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire South Of The Old Police House, Nesscliffe, 18/01122/REM 03/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 18/01127/FUL 23 Merlin Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8XP 23/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land To The South Of Baschurch Road, Bomere 18/01191/FUL 12/06/2018 13 0 13 13 0 0 Heath, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Radbrook Nursing Home, Stanhill Road, 18/01408/FUL 07/06/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY3 6AL 18/01431/FUL 7 Ashton Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 7AN 22/05/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Land North Of Fairholme, Mytton Park, 18/01585/FUL 05/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land On The West Side Of St Michaels Street, 18/01810/FUL 03/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury Chadeslode House, 130 Abbey Foregate, 18/01820/FUL 30/07/2018 10 0 10 10 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 6AX Rear Of 141 Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury, 18/01958/FUL 13/11/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire

A45 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Canal Tavern, New Park Road, Shrewsbury, SY1 18/01998/FUL 03/01/2019 6 0 6 6 0 0 2RS Development East Of Stoneycroft 18/02045/REM Valeswood, Little Ness, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 03/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 17/04319/REM SY4 2LH Lower Fold, The Fold, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, SY5 18/02067/FUL 24/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 7JG Land Adjacent To 102 Priory Ridge, Shrewsbury, 18/02068/FUL 05/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY3 9EJ Land West Of Hafod, Weston Lullingfield, 18/02218/REM 11/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Home Farm, Leaton Knolls, Shrewsbury, 18/02452/FUL 24/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 3HX Olderscot, Yockleton Road, Cardeston, Ford, 18/02493/FUL 30/11/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9NN The Bungalow, Wattlesborough Heath, Halfway 18/02610/FUL 12/11/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 House, Shrewsbury, SY5 9EG Proposed New Dwellings Plots 16A And 16B, 18/02785/FUL 18/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Sandhurst Way, Nesscliffe, Shropshire Bridge Inn, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 18/03157/FUL 21/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY5 7ED Barn North East Of Rossall Grange, Shrewsbury, 18/03162/FUL 26/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land Adjacent 82 Sundorne Road, Shrewsbury, 18/03411/FUL 18/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land South Of Holcroft Way, Cross Houses, 18/03427/FUL 28/09/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 6LS Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 18/03582/REM Pyepit Cottages, Condover, Shrewsbury, 23/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Former Copthorne Barracks, Copthorne Road , 18/03637/REM 01/08/2018 216 0 216 15 38 57 57 167 49 49 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 8LZ H M Prison, The Dana, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 18/03643/REM 06/12/2018 19 0 19 19 19 0 0 2HR Land South Of Millrace Cottage, Longmeadow 18/03663/FUL 28/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drive, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 1 Whitchurch Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 18/03731/FUL 28/11/2018 8 0 8 8 0 0 4DN Proposed Residential Development Land West Of 18/03833/FUL 21/12/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Burnside Gardens, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land North Of Top Farm, Kinton , Shrewsbury, 18/03967/REM 26/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversions At Betton Alkmere 18/03989/FUL 22/01/2019 5 0 5 5 0 0 Farm, Betton Strange, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Land South Of Oteley Road, Shrewsbury, 18/04194/FUL 03/01/2019 93 0 93 93 93 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Plot 3 North Of, Limes Paddock, 18/04235/FUL 28/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Dorrington, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 18/04252/FUL 17 Ebnal Road, Shrewsbury, SY2 6PW 27/11/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Development Plot , Sharpstones Lane, Bayston Hill, 18/04315/REM 14/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire The Dairy, Rowton, Halfway House, Shrewsbury, 18/04418/FUL 07/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 9EP Orchard Barns, Stapleton, Dorrington, Shrewsbury, 18/04421/FUL 07/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 7EJ 18/04427/FUL West Bank, Ford, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9LZ 12/12/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0

A46 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/04485/OUT 14/12/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 West Of Weston Lullingfields, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling To The East Of Mount Pleasant 18/04530/OUT 21/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire The Chesnuts, Halfway House, Shrewsbury, 18/04585/FUL 06/12/2018 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 Shropshire, SY5 9DU Land West Of Lesley Owen Way, Shrewsbury, 18/04674/REM 23/01/2019 40 0 40 40 0 0 Shropshire Land South Of Gregson Close, Shrewsbury, 18/04729/OUT 21/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 18/04777/FUL Land At The Wheatlands, Baschurch, Shropshire 13/12/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Proposed Rural Exception, Site North Of Condover, 18/04797/FUL 25/01/2019 20 0 20 20 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Proposed Dwelling North East Of Waters Edge, Mill 18/04801/OUT 21/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Meole Brace, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Abbey Court Guest House, 134 Abbey Foregate, 18/04837/FUL 19/12/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY2 6AU Merrington Grange, 9 - 10 Merrington, 18/04955/FUL 11/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 3QJ Proposed Dwelling West Of Montpelier House, 18/04964/FUL Alton Terrace, Belle Vue Road, Shrewsbury, 01/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 16 Oak Tree Drive, Bayston Hill, Shrewsbury, SY3 18/05094/FUL 13/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 0LP Land At New Cottages, Shepherds Lane, 18/05189/FUL 01/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 18/05215/FUL 27 Harlescott Crescent, Shrewsbury, SY1 3AU 07/03/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling N Of 18/05265/REM Lower Hem Farm, Hem Lane, Westley, Minsterley, 01/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Albion Hayes Farm, Bomere Heath, Shrewsbury, 18/05346/FUL 01/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 3PW 18/05387/REM West Of Raby Crescent , Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0

Quarry House, Hopton, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 18/05413/FUL 17/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 1DG 18/05460/COU 69 Wyle Cop, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 1UX 04/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Crowmoor House, Frith Close, Shrewsbury, 18/05560/COU 19/03/2019 -31 0 -31 -31 0 0 Shropshire, SY2 5XW First Floor Flat, 55 Monkmoor Road, Shrewsbury, 18/05576/COU 25/01/2019 -1 0 -1 -1 0 0 SY2 5AS 35 Hills Lane (1st, 2nd And 3rd Floor), Shrewsbury, 18/05787/FUL 12/02/2019 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shropshire, SY1 1QU Site Of The Cygnets, Hookagate, Shrewsbury, 18/05838/FUL 25/02/2019 8 0 8 8 0 0 Shropshire 146 Whitchurch Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 18/05856/REM 01/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 4EJ 18/05864/FUL 42 Old Coleham, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 7BU 27/02/2019 5 0 5 5 0 0 Proposed Conversion Of Agricultural Building 19/00165/FUL South Of Westwynd, Montford Bridge, 13/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire N/02/412/BA/657 Part Os 3387, Baschurch, Shrewsbury 27/06/2002 1 0 1 1 0 0 SA/02/1110/F Church House Farm, Little Ness, Shrewsbury 07/02/2003 1 0 1 1 0 0 SA/05/1059/F Butlers House, Harnage, Shrewsbury 15/09/2005 3 0 3 3 0 0 SA/06/0333/F Radbrook Hall Hotel, Radbrook Road, Shrewsbury 21/07/2006 5 0 5 5 0 0 SA/06/1793/F Land R/O 57 Port Hill Road, Shrewsbury 29/03/2007 4 0 4 4 0 0

A47 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding SA/07/1307/F The Coach House, Wilcot Hall, Wilcot, Shrewsbury 27/11/2007 2 0 2 2 0 0 Adj To Severn House, Holyhead Road, Montford SA/07/1812/F 05/03/2008 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridge, Shrewsbury The Allies, Newhouse Farm Lane, Church SA/07/1813/F 10/03/2008 1 0 1 1 0 0 Pulverbatch, Shrewsbury, SY5 8DE SA/08/0330/F 5, 6 & 7 St Austins Street, Shrewsbury 23/05/2008 7 0 7 7 0 0 SA/08/0940/F 3 Drury Lane, Upton Magna, Shrewsbury 26/09/2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marche Manor, Marche Lane, Halfway House, SA/08/1520/F 26/06/2009 7 0 7 7 0 0 Shrewsbury New Bungalow, Charlton Hill Farm, Wroxeter, SA/08/1570/F 27/02/2009 2 1 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Sy5 6Ps SA/09/0171/F Dorrington Grove, Leebotwood, Church Stretton 26/06/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Common Wood Farm, Common Wood, Wem, 09/01981/FUL 18/12/2009 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury 09/03968/FUL Moston Grange, Moston, Stanton, Shrewsbury 23/02/2010 4 0 4 4 0 0 10/01997/FUL Grafton Farm, Loppington, Shrewsbury 26/05/2011 3 0 3 3 0 0 11/03525/FUL Firdene, Ellesmere Road, Harmer Hill, Shrewsbury 16/12/2011 5 1 4 4 0 0 Rye Bank Farm, Rye Bank, Wem, Shrewsbury, SY4 11/03706/FUL 01/11/2012 4 0 4 4 0 0 5RA 11/05507/FUL Holly Farm, Whixall, Whitchurch 16/09/2013 2 0 2 2 0 0 Brandwood Farm, Brandwood, Myddle, 12/02120/REM 17/10/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury 12/02276/FUL Outbuildings At Manor Farm, Wem, Shrewsbury 25/07/2013 2 0 2 2 0 0 12/04313/FUL Adj To 3 Myddle, Shrewsbury 08/07/2013 2 1 1 1 0 0 13/00199/FUL 61 The Hill, Grinshall, Shrewsbury 07/06/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land at Hill Farm Newton On The Hill , Harmer Hill , 13/00507/FUL 11/07/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, SY4 3EH 13/02553/FUL Bank Farm, Wem, Shrewsbury, SY4 5QZ 02/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 13/04974/VAR 14 Aston Street, Wem, Shrewsbury, SY4 5AY 15/02/2013 1 0 1 1 0 0 Little Acorn Farm, Dobsons Bridge, Whixall, 14/00834/FUL 08/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2QD The Oaklands, Shrewsbury Road, Wem, 14/01216/FUL 13/02/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 5PA Development Land SE Of Yorton Station, Yorton, 14/02021/OUT 20/07/2015 6 0 6 6 0 0 Shrewsbury , Shropshire 14/02498/FUL Land Adjacent To 10 Sungrove, Wem, Shropshire 15/07/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Jubilee Cottage , Jubilee Street, Clive, Shrewsbury, 14/05192/REM 25/02/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire , SY4 3JZ Proposed Dwelling Adjacent 13 The Grove, Wem , 15/01939/FUL 08/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land At Village Farm, Booley Road, Stanton Upon 15/04105/REM 17/11/2015 3 2 1 1 0 0 Hine Heath, Shropshire Whixall United Reform Church, Stanley Green, 15/04379/FUL 07/06/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whixall, Shropshire, SY13 2NE Residential Development Land To The North Of 15/04679/REM 14/04/2016 40 35 5 5 0 0 Station Road, Hadnall , Shropshire Land South Of Hermitage Farm, Shrewsbury Road , 15/05061/REM 29/03/2016 28 15 13 13 0 0 Hadnall , Shropshire Loppington House , Loppington , Shrewsbury, 15/05062/COU 14/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5NF Proposed Dwelling SW Of Leondari Manor, Station 15/05450/REM 07/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Hadnall , Shropshire 58 Noble Street, Wem, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/00228/FUL 11/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY4 5DT 16/00994/FUL Roseville, New Street, Wem , Shropshire, SY4 5AB 09/11/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0

A48 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 2 Summerfield Road, Wem, Shrewsbury, 16/01417/REM 21/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY4 5BW Trentham Garage, 22B Noble Street, Wem , SY4 16/01843/FUL 06/07/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 5DZ Arran House, Myddle, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 16/02461/FUL 17/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 3RP Marton Hall Cottage & Stable Cottage, Marton, 16/02630/FUL 10/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Baschurch, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 2BU Land To The South Of Drayton Road, Shawbury, 16/02772/FUL 12/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Tony Moss Motor Cycles, 56 Aston Street, Wem, 16/02959/FUL 29/03/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 5AU Outbuildings At The Rookery, Northwood, 16/03150/FUL 25/04/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Park House, Loppington, Shrewsbury, Shropshire , 16/03175/FUL 08/11/2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 SY4 5NG 3 And 4 The Shrubbery And The Poplars, 16/03758/FUL 20/01/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loppington, Shropshire Hatton Barns, High Hatton, Shrewsbury, 16/04125/FUL 08/06/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 4EZ High Hatton Village Hall, High Hatton, Shrewsbury, 16/04297/FUL 10/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land To East Of Bridge Farm, Platt Lane, Whixall , 16/04363/FUL 24/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire , SY13 2PA Development Land East Of A53, Shrewsbury Road, 16/05474/FUL 04/10/2017 50 35 15 15 15 0 0 Shawbury , Shropshire 16/05727/FUL Mill House Farm, Whitchurch Road, Wem, SY4 5QR 15/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0

16/05869/FUL Islington House, 79 New Street, Wem, SY4 5AF 20/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Top House, Northwood , Wem, Shrewsbury, 17/00895/FUL 11/10/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5NN Manor Farm , Lee Brockhurst, Shrewsbury, 17/01435/FUL 13/12/2017 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5QH 17/02241/REM Land Adjacent Ash Grove, Wem, Shropshire 18/10/2017 10 0 10 10 0 0 The Woodlands, Wolverley, Wem, Shrewsbury, 17/02623/FUL 01/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5NQ 17/02951/REM Land At Lowe Hill , The Lowe, Wem , Shropshire 16/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Adj Creamore Villa, Whitchurch Road, Wem, 17/03245/REM 02/11/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire Land Adj Creamore Villa, Whitchurch Road, Wem, 17/03247/REM 01/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 17/03264/VAR 31 High Street, Wem, Shrewsbury 17/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Residential Development Land To The 17/03582/FUL 19/01/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 East Of New Street, Wem, Shropshire Hollins Farm, Merrington, Bomere Heath, 17/03609/FUL 01/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 3QF The Small Barn, Coton Park Farm, Coton , 17/03802/FUL 10/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Garage At 4 Platt Lane, Whixall, Shropshire, SY13 17/04193/FUL 20/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 2NX Proposed Dwelling Adjacent Riverside , Mill Street, 17/04308/FUL 02/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wem , Shropshire Proposed Conversion Of Storage Building, 17/04365/FUL 05/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Foxholes, Wem, Shropshire Outbuilding At Rear Of The White Lion, 1 High 17/04394/FUL 07/12/2017 4 0 4 4 0 0 Street, Wem, Shropshire Land Adjacent To St Andrews Church, Stanton 17/04766/FUL 02/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Upon Hine Heath, Shropshire

A49 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land North Of 17/05164/FUL 26/01/2018 4 2 2 2 0 0 Robin Hill , Myddle, Shropshire , SY4 3QS 17/05911/FUL Land At Harmer Hill , Shropshire 31/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Dwelling South Of Seven Oaks, Barkers 18/00402/FUL 04/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Green, Wem, Shropshire 18/00824/FUL Shawbury Park, Shawbury, Shropshire 03/09/2018 4 0 4 4 0 0 18/00846/REM Land Off Roden Grove , Wem, Shropshire 01/06/2018 25 0 25 25 0 0 18/01038/FUL Dunroamin, Wem Lane, Soulton, Wem, SY4 5RT 17/05/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0

18/01748/FUL Papillion, Wytheford Road, Shawbury, SY4 4JH 05/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 The Old Wharf, Edstaston, Wem, Shrewsbury, 18/02299/FUL 22/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5RF Proposed Residential Development Land East Of 18/02662/OUT 20/08/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 118 Church Street, Shawbury, Shropshire

Agricultural Building At Holly Farm, Abbeygreen, 18/02908/FUL 05/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whixall, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2PT Wayside, Station Road, Clive, Shrewsbury, 18/02959/FUL 03/08/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 3LD Lane To The North Of Crabtree Lane, Wem, 18/03646/OUT 01/10/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Land East Of Silverbriars, Lower Road, Myddle, 18/04903/FUL 23/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 18/05088/OUT 15 Park Avenue, Shawbury, SY4 4JZ 24/01/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Proposed Dwelling West Of Holly Bank, Ellesmere 19/00320/FUL 27/03/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Harmer Hill, Shropshire NS/05/00423/FUL Northwood Farm, Northwood, Wem, Shrewsbury 10/05/2005 3 0 3 3 0 0 Barn At Hazels Road, Stanton Upon Hine Heath, NS/07/01589/FUL 03/10/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Coton House Farm, Station Road, Prees, NS/07/02302/FUL 31/01/2008 5 0 5 5 0 0 Whitchurch NS/08/00160/FUL Manor Farm, Lee Brockhurst, Shrewsbury 29/07/2011 6 1 4 4 0 0 NS/08/00570/FUL Wytheford Hall, Wytheford, Shawbury, Shrewsbury 29/05/2008 5 0 5 5 0 0 The Barns, Shooters Hill, Wem Road, Clive, NS/08/01959/FUL 09/09/2009 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury NS/08/01981/FUL Myrtle Villa, New Street, Wem, Shrewsbury 07/01/2009 3 0 3 3 0 0 10/01959/FUL Plot At Chester Avenue, Whitchurch 07/07/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/02454/FUL Yew Tree Cottage, Church Lane, Ash, Whitchurch 04/08/2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/04536/FUL Land Adj. 8 Calverhall, Whitchurch, SY13 4PE 08/12/2010 1 0 1 1 0 0 10/05259/FUL Tilstock Hall, Tilstock, Whitchurch, SY13 3NR 04/04/2011 7 1 6 6 0 0 10/05416/FUL Sandford House, Tilstock Park, Whitchurch 01/11/2011 4 0 4 4 0 0 Oxhaven, Burleydam,Ightfield, Whitchurch, SY13 11/00369/FUL 06/09/2011 2 0 2 2 0 0 4BW Land Adj Wood View, Lacon Street, Prees, 11/05484/FUL 24/05/2012 2 1 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch Barns At Oaklands Farm, Weston Under Redcastle, 12/00059/FUL 23/04/2013 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shrewsbury Pine Lodge Tyre Services, A41, Higher Heath, 12/02721/FUL 17/09/2012 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, SY13 2JA Barns At Broughall House Farm, Ash Road, 12/03618/FUL 12/02/2013 3 0 3 3 0 0 Whitchurch Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling At Fields 13/02533/FUL Farm, Broadhay Lane, Lower Heath, Prees, 26/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Storage Land And Premises (former Dairy) Mile 13/03481/OUT 17/09/2015 70 0 70 25 25 20 70 0 0 Bank Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire

A50 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding 13/03490/REM Land At Black Park Road, Whitchurch 07/01/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land At Tilstock Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire , 13/05077/OUT 21/05/2015 344 0 344 44 44 75 75 150 150 150 SY13 3JG Holiday Cottage, Ivy Farm, Broughall, Whitchurch, 14/00086/FUL 24/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY13 4EE Bradburys, 42 High Street, Whitchurch, Shropshire , 14/00375/FUL 13/08/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY13 1BB Oak Hollow, Whixall , Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 14/00937/FUL 18/05/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 2NZ Land Adjacent To Windrush , Tilstock, Shropshire, 14/02208/REM 25/11/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY13 3NR 14/03013/OUT Land To North Christ Church, Tilstock, Shropshire 13/01/2016 17 0 17 17 0 0

14/04751/FUL Oaklands Nook Lane, Weston, Shrewsbury , SY4 5LP 11/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land Between 18 And 30 Pear Tree Lane, 15/00680/FUL 24/09/2015 4 0 4 4 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 1NQ Proposed Residential Development East Of 163 15/03200/REM 26/11/2015 20 8 12 12 0 0 Wrexham Road , Whitchurch, Shropshire Fenns Bank Pumping Station, Fenns Bank, 15/03868/REM 03/12/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Yockings Gate Farm, Black Park Road, Black Park, 15/04217/FUL 20/12/2016 4 0 4 4 0 0 Whitchurch , SY13 4JP 19 Burleydam Road And Adjoining Land Ightfield, 15/04573/FUL 23/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Whitchurch , SY13 4BW Development Land South Of Chester Road, 15/05047/REM 20/02/2017 52 23 29 25 4 29 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Gro Continental Ltd, Heathwood Road, Higher 15/05307/REM 06/01/2017 115 6 109 6 6 6 6 10 34 10 10 20 55 55 Heath, Whitchurch Land Adjacent To Heathfields, Golf House Lane, 16/00749/REM 07/06/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Prees Heath , Shropshire Land Adjacent To White Lion, Ash Magna, 16/01707/FUL 18/10/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Outbuildings At Heathgates Farm, Lower Heath, 16/02104/FUL 25/08/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Prees, Shropshire Land At Tilstock Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire , 16/02160/REM 21/05/2015 156 0 156 35 35 55 31 156 0 0 SY13 3JG Land Off Shrewsbury Street, Prees, Shropshire, 16/02309/FUL 24/08/2016 2 1 1 1 0 0 SY13 2DH Garage At The Rear Of The Old Constable House, 16/02528/FUL 10/03/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shrewsbury Street, Prees, Shropshire The Pines, Mill Lane , Higher Heath, Whitchurch, 16/02599/REM 21/10/2016 20 0 20 20 0 0 Shropshire, SY13 2HR Proposed Dwelling West Of The Spinney, 16/02933/FUL Heathwood Road, Higher Heath , Whitchurch, 22/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Proposed Dwelling Adjacent 14 Chester Avenue, 16/02938/FUL 08/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Land Adjacent To Northside Mill Lane, Higher 16/03129/REM 18/10/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Heath, Whitchurch, SY13 2HR Proposed Residential Development North Of 16/03186/FUL 24/01/2017 2 1 1 1 0 0 Chester Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire 16/03978/REM Church Farm, Calverhall, Whitchurch 21/12/2016 16 0 16 16 0 0 16/04460/FUL 5 Mill Street, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 1SE 14/12/2018 8 0 8 8 0 0 The Vicarage, Tilstock, Whitchurch, Shropshire, 16/04615/OUT 05/07/2017 24 0 24 24 0 0 SY13 3JL Land At Edward German Drive , Whitchurch, 16/04803/FUL 02/12/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire First Floor, 16 Station Road, Whitchurch, 16/04830/FUL 01/12/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire , SY13 1RF

A51 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Alkington Road Stores, Alkington Road, 16/05300/COU 01/02/2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 Whitchurch, SY13 1SU 16/05652/FUL 31 Chemistry, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 1BZ 06/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Land To The Rear Walford House, 24 Shrewsbury 16/05870/FUL 31/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Street, Prees, Shropshire 17/00489/FUL Herald Printers, Newtown , Whitchurch, SY13 1BH 06/06/2017 9 0 9 9 0 0 Proposed Barn Conversion At Aychley Farm , 17/00667/FUL 21/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Aychley, Market Drayton, Shropshire Land To The North Of Caldecott Crescent, 17/00673/FUL 15/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire Proposed Barn Conversion At New Street Lane, 17/01035/FUL 26/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton , SY13 4PJ Proposed Dwelling To The South Of Talisman, Golf 17/01870/OUT 11/05/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 House Lane, Prees Heath, Shropshire

17/02772/FUL 34 High Street , Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 1BB 28/09/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Land Off Alport Road, Whitchurch , Shropshire, 17/03076/REM 31/01/2018 90 0 90 15 25 25 25 90 0 0 SY13 1NR Land To The Rear Midway Truckstop, Heath Road , 17/03615/FUL 17/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Prees Heath, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 3JT Aychley Farm, Aychley, Market Drayton, 17/03639/FUL 20/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 3SA Proposed Residential Development To The West Of 17/03775/OUT 11/01/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Shrewsbury Street, Prees, Shropshire Land Adjacent To The Croft, Towers Drive , Higher 17/03955/REM 13/08/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Heath, Whitchurch , Shropshire Corner House, Ash , Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 17/04086/FUL 07/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 4DL Land Adj Berwick Heathwood Road, Higher Heath , 17/04236/REM 09/05/2018 10 0 10 10 0 0 Whitchurch, SY13 2HF Church Farm, Calverhall, Whitchurch, Shropshire, 17/04287/FUL 20/02/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 SY13 4PE Land To The North Of Station Road, Prees, 17/04470/FUL 07/11/2018 13 0 13 13 0 0 Shropshire Rose Villa, 91 Twemlows Avenue, Higher Heath, 17/05068/FUL 16/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2HD 17/05092/FUL Broughall Fields, Ash Road , Whitchurch, SY13 4DE 23/01/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Dwelling Adjacent The Woodlands 17/05222/OUT 12/12/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 House, Calverhall, Whitchurch, Shropshire Hinton Lodge, Hinton, Whitchurch, Shropshire, 17/05290/FUL 13/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY13 4HB United Reform Church, Mill Street, Prees , 17/05425/FUL 23/03/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2DL Proposed Dwelling North Of Church Barn, Church 17/06017/FUL 11/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Street, Ightfield, Shropshire Residential Development At Silver Birch Mill Lane , 17/06143/OUT 09/03/2018 5 0 5 5 0 0 Higher Heath, Whitchurch, SY13 2HR Workshop Rear Of The Greyhound Inn, Bargates, 18/00200/FUL 10/05/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Whitchurch, SY13 1LL 18/01221/FUL 6-8 Mill Street, Whitchurch, SY13 1SE 25/04/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Proposed Residential Development South Of Ash 18/01586/REM 31/07/2018 6 0 6 6 0 0 Hall, Ash Magna, Whitchurch, Shropshire Land Opposite Moreton Farm, Moreton Street, 18/01871/FUL 15/01/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Prees, Shropshire

A52 Appendix A: Sites with Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Planning Application Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2026/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Residential Development Land To The 18/02061/FUL 03/10/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 North Of Pepper Street, Whitchurch, Shropshire

Agricultural Building At Lower Lodge, Black Park 18/02771/FUL 07/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Black Park, Whitchurch, Shropshire Land Adjacent To The Dell, Shrewsbury Street, 18/04491/FUL 03/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Prees, Shropshire, SY13 2DH Shirlee Sajana, 40 Twemlows Avenue, Higher 18/04646/OUT 31/01/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heath, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2HE View Mount, Alkington Road, Whitchurch, 18/05306/FUL 02/01/2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shropshire, SY13 1TD Proposed Residential Development Land To The 19/00788/OUT East Of Ballacraine, Heathwood Road, Higher 28/03/2019 2 0 2 2 0 0 Heath, Whitchurch, Shropshire Barn Adj To Firestone House, Shrewsbury Street, NS/02/00850/FUL 28/11/2002 2 1 1 1 0 0 Prees, Whitchurch NS/02/01074/FUL Hinton Bank Farm, Hinton, Whitchurch 27/06/2003 3 0 3 3 0 0 NS/04/00702/FUL Dearnford Hall, Tilstock Road, Whitchurch 17/09/2004 2 0 2 2 0 0 NS/06/01915/FUL Field O.S. 8775 Broadhay Lane, Prees, Lower Heath 16/11/2006 1 0 1 1 0 0 Brades Farm, Brades Road, Prees, Whitchurch, NS/07/00834/FUL 10/07/2007 5 2 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, SY13 2DX NS/07/01484/FUL 7 The Hermitage, Church Street, Whitchurch 17/09/2007 1 0 1 1 0 0 NS/08/00428/FUL Fauls Farm, Fauls, Whitchurch 25/04/2008 3 0 3 3 0 0 NS1999/00692 Plot 19 Birchwood Grove, Higher Heath 01/01/2000 1 0 1 1 0 0 9,955 8,615 955 385

10% Reduction: 862 10% Reduction: 96 10% Reduction: 39 Total: 7,754 Total: 860 Total: 347

A53

Appendix B. Deliverability of Sites for Major Development with Outline Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix B: Deliverability of Sites for Major Development with Outline Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019

Planning Application Address Date of Decision Deliverability Complex brownfield site crossing Local Authority and national boundaries (completions forecast on the site reflect the extent of development anticipated on the element of the site in Shropshire). 13/01854/OUT Residential Development Land West Of Mill Green, Knighton , Powys 27/01/2015 Reflecting this complexity 5 years was allowed for submission of the Reserved Matters Application. Site is considered deliverable towards the end of the five year period. Davro Iron & Steel Co Ltd, Ridgewell Works, Stourbridge Road, 14/00030/OUT 18/07/2016 Full Planning Application (18/05486/FUL) pending consideration for 18 dwellings on the site. Wootton, Bridgnorth, WV15 6ED Consent granted at Planning Appeal. Proposed Development Land To The East Of Avenue Road, Broseley, 14/04019/OUT 31/08/2016 Appellants confirmed deliverability of the site during the appeal process. Shropshire Reserved Matters Application (19/03639/REM) pending consideration. Rosewood Pet Products Ltd , 45 Coalport Road, Broseley, Shropshire , 14/04891/OUT 08/09/2015 Reserved Matters Application (18/03235/REM) pending decision for development of the site. TF12 5AN A strategic site to be delivered in phases. Reserved Matters Application (19/001187/REM) received for the first phase (50 14/04047/OUT Proposed Marina South Of Canal Way, Ellesmere, Shropshire 20/12/2016 dwellings) of residential development. 13/03862/OUT Proposed Residential Development South Of A49, Ludlow, Shropshire 30/11/2015 Reserved Matters Application (18/05461/REM) pending consideration for development of the site. Full Planning Application for formation of the access road and attenuation pond (17/05983/FUL) granted. 14/01012/OUT Development Land North Side Of Sheet Road, Ludlow, Shropshire 12/09/2016 Reserved Matters Application (19/02741/REM) pending consideration for 68 dwellings. Reserved Matters Application (19/00242/REM) recently refused due to issues including design, layout, open space and surface water drainage. However it is considered that a deliverable scheme can be achieved on the site and the submission of 14/02846/OUT Coach Depot, Fishmore Road, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 2LU 07/02/2017 a Reserved Matters Application by a development company support the conclusion that the site is deliverable in the next 5 years. Proposed Residential Development Land At Foldgate Lane, Ludlow, 14/04608/OUT 10/11/2016 Reserved Matters Application (18/02413/REM) pending consideration for development of the site. Shropshire Proposed Residential Development East Of Fishmore Road, Ludlow, 16/03096/OUT 19/02/2019 Reserved Matters Application (19/02060/REM) pending consideration for 67 dwellings. Shropshire Reserved Matters Application (15/05444/REM) for Plots 9, 10 and 11. Reserved Matters Application (17/00767/REM) for a single dwelling on Plot 2. Reserved Matters Application (17/03636/REM) for Plots 3 and 4. 14/00790/OUT Land Off Bearstone Road, Norton In Hales, Market Drayton, Shropshire 05/06/2015 Reserved Matters Application (18/01469/REM) for Plot 8. Reserved Matters Application (18/01470/REM) for Plots 10 and 11. Reserved Matters Application (17/05995/REM) for Plot 14. A number of completions have been achieved on the site. Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan. Recent consent granted and considered deliverable. 14/03782/OUT Land Off Greenfields Lane, Market Drayton, Shropshire 09/03/2018 The site is considered viable and is being marketed for development. Land At 18 Dutton Close , Stoke Heath , Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 15/00415/OUT 05/02/2016 Reserved Matters Application (19/00471/REM) granted development of the site after 31st March 2019. 2JN Site has been sold for development. 15/03969/OUT Stoke Heath Camp , Warrant Road, Stoke Heath, Shropshire 25/05/2016 A Full Planning Application (19/02385/FUL) for the construction of 38 dwellings is pending consideration on the site. 14/01233/OUT Land At Minsterley Road, Pontesbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 17/03/2015 Reserved Matters Application (17/05709/REM) granted for 18 dwellings after 31st March 2019. Reserved Matters Application (17/00149/REM) granted for 15 dwellings. Land Off Horsebridge Road, Minsterley, Shrewsbury , Shropshire, SY5 14/03670/OUT 29/01/2016 Subsequent Outline Planning Application (18/05802/OUT), submitted by a local developer and granted post 31st March 2019 0AA for 28 dwellings. 13/04954/OUT 104 Llwyn Road, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1EW 25/06/2015 Reserved Matters Application (18/02681/REM) pending consideration for development of the site. The site is considered suitable, available, achievable and viable. Relatively small scheme which could easily be built out within 14/03665/OUT Garage Adjacent To The Last Inn, Hengoed, Shropshire 09/05/2017 a year. Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan. Recent consent granted and considered deliverable. 14/05708/OUT The Sawmills , Rhoswiel , Weston Rhyn, Oswestry , Shropshire, SY10 7TG 18/09/2017 The site is considered viable and is being marketed for development. Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan. When considered for allocation, the sites suitability, availability and achievability was confirmed. Land At Rhosyllan Farm, Overton Road, St Martins, Oswestry, 15/03726/OUT 15/08/2016 Outline Planning Permission has subsequently been secured and it is understood that the land owner is proactively working Shropshire, SY11 3ER towards submission of a Reserved Matters Application. Full Planning Application now pending consideration for 80 dwellings. Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan and a recent consent has been granted. 16/01735/OUT Land South Of Aspen Grange, Weston Rhyn, Shropshire 21/12/2017 The site is considered viable and is being actively marketed for development. Proposed Residential Development Land Off Southlands Avenue, The site is considered suitable, available, achievable and viable. 18/00018/OUT 07/11/2018 Gobowen, Shropshire Development to be implemented in phases. Reserved Matters Application (16/05492/REM) granted for formation of green infrastructure and SUDs. 13/05136/OUT Land Between Lawton Road And Stanton Road, Shifnal, Shropshire 03/02/2016 Reserved Matters Application (18/00726/REM) for phase 1 of development (99 dwellings) granted after the 31st March 2018. Reserved Matters Application (19/00494/REM) for phase 2 of development (70 bed self-contained extra care unit) granted after 31st March 2019.

B1 Appendix B: Deliverability of Sites for Major Development with Outline Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019

Planning Application Address Date of Decision Deliverability

Significant investment and works have occurred on site under a series of Planning Applications including demolition of existing buildings not being retained and restoration of other buildings (including works associated with the main mill). 10/03237/OUT Flax Mill, St Michaels Street, Shrewsbury 05/11/2010 Parts of the site now in active use. Planning Application (19/02769/FUL) pending consideration for on and off-site infrastructure (road and pedestrian links).

14/02454/OUT Land Off Station Road, Baschurch , Shropshire 03/12/2015 Reserved Matters Application (18/05447/REM) pending decision for development of the site.

A strategic site to be delivered in phases. A series of Reserved Matters Applications have been granted on the site. 18/05232/REM granted for the implementation of necessary engineering works. Development Land To The South Of Oteley Road, Shrewsbury, 17/06149/REM granted for the first phase (164 dwellings) of residential development. 14/04428/OUT 23/06/2015 Shropshire 19/00048/REM granted after the 31st March 2019 for the second phase (49 dwellings) of residential development. 19/04460/REM pending consideration for 175 dwellings. Development commenced.

Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan. 15/05337/OUT Land To The West Of Battlefield Road , Shrewsbury, Shropshire 08/09/2016 Site is being actively marketed for development. Promoter is confident that this marketing will be successful and early delivery will occur. This is a Hybrid Application. Full consent granted for 353 dwellings and outline consent for up to 247 dwellings. 17/01612/OUT Land Between Preston Street & London Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire 08/08/2018 Development commencing at pace. Proposed Residential Development Car Park And Premises, Old Recent application. Reserved Matters Application (19/02949/REM) pending decision. Developer has control of the site and is 17/01697/OUT 12/02/2019 Coleham, Shrewsbury, SY3 7BP rapidly progressing adjacent sites. A large site to be implemented in phases. A Reserved Matters Application (18/03025/REM) has been granted for formation of the access. 17/02809/OUT H M Prison, The Dana, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 2HR 14/09/2017 A Reserved Matters Application (18/03643/REM) granted for the first phase (conversion of school to 11 dwellings and demolition of school grage building to form 8 dwellings and parking) of residential development. Various conditions on the site have been discharged. Proposed Care Home, Shillingston Drive, Berwick Grange, Shrewsbury, Outline Planning Permission secured by well established national developer. 17/05325/OUT 09/07/2018 Shropshire The site is considered suitable, available, achievable and viable. Storage Land And Premises (former Dairy) Mile Bank Road , Whitchurch, On-site demolition works commenced under (18/01740/FUL). 13/03481/OUT 17/09/2015 Shropshire Reserved Matters Application (18/00552/REM) pending consideration for development of the site. 13/05077/OUT Land At Tilstock Road, Whitchurch, Shropshire , SY13 3JG 21/05/2015 Reserved Matters Application (16/02160/REM) granted for Phase 1 (156 dwellings). 14/03013/OUT Land To North Christ Church, Tilstock, Shropshire 13/01/2016 Reserved Matters Application (18/05370/REM) pending consideration for development of the site. Site allocated within the SAMDev Plan. Recent consent granted and considered deliverable. 16/04615/OUT The Vicarage, Tilstock, Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 3JL 05/07/2017 The site is considered suitable, available, achievable and viable. Relatively small scheme which could easily be built out within a year.

B2

Appendix C. Sites with a Prior Approval decision as at 31st March 2019

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix C: Sites with Prior Approval as at 31st March 2019 Prior Approval Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Prior Approval Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Potato Store And Stables Adj Parkside Farm , 14/05673/PMBPA 25/02/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Holyhead Road , Albrighton, Shropshire

Workshop 1 & 2, The Old Estate Yard, Badger, 18/00758/P3JPA 21/03/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV6 7JX

Poole Meadow, Beamish Lane, Albrighton, 18/03305/PMBPA 25/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV7 3AG Little Woodbatch Barn , Woodbatch, Bishops 17/05576/PMBPA 05/02/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Castle, Shropshire, SY9 5JT Barn Adjacent Farmcote Cottage, Farmcote, 14/05547/PMBPA 05/02/2015 2 1 1 1 0 0 Claverley, Shropshire Barn North Of B4364, Faintree, Bridgnorth, 15/00652/PMBPA 24/03/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Sydnall Barn, Middleton Priors, Bridgnorth , 15/02604/PMBPA 26/08/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 6UN Brantley Farm, Broughton, Claverley , 15/03450/PMBPA 12/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Wolverhampton, Shropshire, WV5 7AR Barn Adjacent To The Wain House, Glazeley, 16/02785/PMBPA 17/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire , WV16 6AA Barn At Farmcote Farm, Farmcote, Claverley, 17/00920/PMBPA 20/04/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Barn North Of Fairfields Farm, Middleton Priors, 17/01159/PMBPA 24/05/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Agricultural Building, Hilton, Bridgnorth, 17/04248/PMBPA 23/11/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire M Dady Associates, Office And Premises, 25 17/05528/P3JPA 05/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Salop Street, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV16 5BH Land To The South East Of Upper Netchwood, 18/00566/PMBPA 21/06/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bridgnorth, Shropshire Sunnywood, Padmore , Leebotwood, Church 14/03302/PMBPA 06/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6NH Barns To The North West Of 29 Walkmills, 15/02410/PMBPA 15/09/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Church Stretton, Shropshire Ruckley Oak Barn, Acton Burnell, Shrewsbury, 16/05758/PMBPA 10/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Lower Neen, Neen Savage, Cleobury Mortimer, 14/04670/PMBPA 26/01/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Kidderminster, Shropshire, DY14 8JU

Agricultural Building, Inellan, Clee Hill Road, 15/04890/PMBPA 08/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Burford, Tenbury Wells, Shropshire , WR15 8HL Upper Northwood Farm, Northwood Lane, 16/01221/PMBPA Northwood, Chorley , Bridgnorth , Shropshire, 13/05/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 WV16 6PT Barn At Neen House Farm, Neen Savage, 16/04786/PMBPA 11/01/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire Barn A Fastings Farm, Button Bridge Lane, 16/04986/PMBPA 22/02/2017 2 0 2 2 0 0 Buttonbridge, Kinlet, Shropshire Former Cattle Building At Bowens Cottage, 17/04968/PMBPA 22/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Baveney Wood, Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire Barn At Lawns Farm, Meaton, Kinlet, 18/04109/PMBPA 02/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, DY14 8NT Barn At Pool Cottage , Seifton Lane, Seifton , 15/00125/PMBPA 20/03/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire 16/01029/PIAPA Seifton Village Hall , Seifton, Craven Arms, 16/08/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 16/02661/PIAPA Shropshire, SY8 2DH

C1 Appendix C: Sites with Prior Approval as at 31st March 2019 Prior Approval Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Prior Approval Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling North East Of New House 17/04047/PMBPA 24/10/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm , Seifton, Craven Arms, Shropshire The Old School House, 3A Wharf Road, 14/01912/P3JPA 24/06/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ellesmere, Shropshire, SY12 0EJ Proposed Barn Conversion, Northwood, 18/04974/PMBPA 10/12/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ellesmere, Shropshire Barn Adjacent Crown Farm , Knowbury, 15/02165/PMBPA 12/08/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire

Barn Adjacent To The Long House , Angel Bank, 15/04725/PMBPA 11/01/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Bitterley, Shropshire

Walks Farm, Greete, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 16/05772/PMBPA 14/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 3BS Burnt House, Mitnell Lane, Richards Castle, 18/01326/PMBPA 10/10/2018 3 0 3 3 0 0 Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 4EJ Agricultural Building At Barns Farm Park Lane, 18/03152/PMBPA 25/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Woofferton, Shropshire Park Heath Farm, Soudley, Market Drayton, 15/00305/PMBPA 11/02/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 2NP Agricultural Building South East Of Colehurst, 15/02535/PMBPA 04/09/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Market Drayton, Shropshire Dairy Shed, Tunstall Farm, Hodnet, Market 16/02072/PMBPA 02/09/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 3JJ Barn At Hall Farm, Tern Hill, Market Drayton, 17/00627/PMBPA 22/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF9 3PU 18/04406/PMBPA Barn At Cadbury Buildings, Hodnet, Shropshire 21/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hedgefields Barn, Edge Farm , East Wall, 15/05529/P3MPA 10/02/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Ground Floor, 64 High Street, Much Wenlock, 17/00263/P3JPA 21/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6AE 14/03608/P3JPA 1 Cabin Lane, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 2DZ 30/09/2014 3 0 3 3 0 0 Halston Hall, Whittington, Oswestry, 17/00597/PMBPA 28/03/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY11 4NS Wykey Farm, Wykey, Ruyton Xi Towns, 18/03109/PMBPA 21/09/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 1JA Oakleigh Farm, Edgerley, Kinnerley, Oswestry, 18/04750/PMBPA 21/11/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 8EP Oakhurst Hall, Oakhurst Road, Oswestry, 19/00041/P3JPA 26/02/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 7BZ The Square, Market Place, Shifnal, Shropshire, 13/03135/P3JPA 05/03/2014 6 0 6 6 0 0 TF11 9AX 20 Bradford Street, Shifnal , Shropshire TF11 13/03254/P3JPA 07/10/2013 4 0 4 4 0 0 8AU Barn At Longmeadow, The Wyke, Shifnal, 14/03494/PMBPA 07/10/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Bolams Brook Farm, Chadwell, Sheriffhales, 14/04692/PMBPA 14/01/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Newport , Shropshire, TF10 9BG

Ted's Farm Shop, Hunger Hill Farm, 17/05782/PIAPA 31/01/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Sheriffhales, Shifnal , Shropshire, TF11 8SA Proposed Barn Conversions At Hunger Hill, 18/01772/PMBPA 10/08/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Sheriffhales, Shropshire The Coach House, Crescent Lane, Shrewsbury, 13/04982/P3JPA 14/02/2014 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY1 1TR Wheatland Services Ltd, Showroom, Ford, 14/03023/P3JPA 08/10/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9LE

C2 Appendix C: Sites with Prior Approval as at 31st March 2019 Prior Approval Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Prior Approval Address Date of Decision Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding School House Farm, Ford Heath, Shrewsbury, 14/04602/PMBPA 11/12/2014 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire , SY5 9GD Barn North West Of Sascott Farm, Ford, 15/01827/PMBPA 22/06/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Hilley Farm, Pentre, Shrewsbury , Shropshire, 15/04721/PMBPA 29/04/2016 2 0 2 2 0 0 SY4 1BP 18-20 Castle Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 16/01140/P3JPA 15/04/2016 3 0 3 3 0 0 SY1 2AZ Agricultural Building At Church Farm, Yockleton 17/02896/PMBPA 11/08/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Road, Cardeston, Ford, Shropshire Agricultural Building At Forton Airfield, 18/02036/PMBPA 13/07/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Montford Bridge, Shrewsbury, Shropshire Agricultural Building Conversion, Astley, 18/02956/PMBPA 30/08/2018 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire 27/28 Castle Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, 18/04290/P3JPA 15/11/2018 16 0 16 16 0 0 SY1 2BQ Barn At Buckley Farm, Melverley Road, Pentre, 18/04710/PMBPA 14/12/2018 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire Office, Gains Lodge West, Gains Avenue, 18/05507/P3JPA 14/01/2019 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY3 5AN Shawbury Grove Farm, Bings Heath , Astley, 14/05605/PMBPA 11/02/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 4BY Barns Adjacent To Aprocto, Aston, Wem, 15/01800/PMBPA 26/06/2015 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire, SY4 5JH Barn At Silverdale, Butlers Bank, Shawbury, 15/02578/PMBPA 01/10/2015 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Building At Moss Farm, Muckleton Lane, 16/05832/PMBPA 21/02/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Edgebolton, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 4HF 118 Church Street, Shawbury, Shropshire, SY4 17/03710/P3JPA 04/10/2017 3 0 3 3 0 0 4NH Ash Wood, Church Lane, Ash Magna, 15/04370/PMBPA 16/12/2015 3 0 3 3 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 4EA Chinnel Farm, Mile Bank, Whitchurch, 16/03679/PMBPA 14/11/2016 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY13 4JY Agricultural Building At Bank House, Dark Lane, 17/01198/PMBPA 07/11/2017 1 0 1 1 0 0 Old Woodhouses, Whitchurch, Shropshire Bredwood Arcade, Green End, Whitchurch, 18/04915/P3JPA Shropshire 20/12/2018 7 0 7 7 0 0

128 128 0 0

10% Reduction: 13 10% Reduction: 0 10% Reduction: 0 Total: 115 Total: 0 Total: 0

C3

Appendix D. Sites with a ‘resolution to grant’ as at 31st March 2019

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix D: Sites with a 'resolution to grant' Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Resolution to Grant Information Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Beyond Plan Period

Planning Net Net Address Deliverability Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Application Completions Outstanding

Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. Site within a settlements development boundary 3 Market Square , Bishops Castle, 12/01319/FUL where the settlement has been identified as a suitable 2 0 2 2 0 0 Shropshire , SY9 5BN location for infill/windfall development within the SAMDev Plan.

Conversion of an existing building, including barns. Hurst Mill Farm, Clunton, Craven 18/01234/VAR Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 1 0 1 1 0 0 Arms, Shropshire, SY7 0JA Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural Proposed Dwelling SW Of Pollardine dwellings. 18/03448/FUL Farm, Gatten, Pontesbury, 1 0 1 1 0 0 Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Brownfield site within a settlement development Shropshire Council Offices, boundary. 14/02693/OUT Westgate, Bridgnorth, Shropshire , 40 0 40 40 0 0 Landowner has confirmed that they are continuing to WV16 5AA seek to secure the site for development. Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling At Manor Farm , Manor Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 16/05343/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Farm Lane, Oldbury , Bridgnorth, dwellings. Shropshire Hermitage Cottage, Bridgnorth, 17/01556/FUL Conversion of an existing building. 7 0 7 7 0 0 Shropshire, WV15 5HW Proposed Affordable Dwelling Land Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 17/02864/FUL NE Of Monkhopton, Bridgnorth, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. Land At Innage Lane, Bridgnorth, 18/02281/FUL Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 50 0 50 50 0 0 Shropshire, WV16 4HJ Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Sunnyside, Kinlet, Bewdley, DY12 Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 14/02608/FUL 1 0 1 0 0 0 3BU dwellings. Proposed Agricultural Workers Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/00312/FUL Dwelling North West Of Abdon, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Craven Arms, Shropshire Proposed Affordable Dwelling West Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/02649/FUL Of Cold Weston, Clee St Margaret, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire Brooklands Farm , Dudleston, Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 16/05509/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Ellesmere , Shropshire , SY12 9JG dwellings. Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. Sites within a settlements development boundary Old Station Yard, Brownlow Road, within the SAMDev Plan. 18/01027/OUT 65 0 65 25 25 50 15 15 0 Ellesmere, Shropshire Hybrid Application, consisting of a Full Application for 7 dwellings and Outline Application for 58 dwellings. Applicant is Homes England.

Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural Land To The East Of dwellings. 15/05079/OUT Covert Lane, Chelmarsh, Bridgnorth, 1 0 1 1 0 0 Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Proposed Affordable Dwelling North Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/02384/FUL Of Jays Farm, Hope Bagot, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire

D1 Appendix D: Sites with a 'resolution to grant' Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Resolution to Grant Information Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Beyond Plan Period

Planning Net Net Address Deliverability Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Application Completions Outstanding Proposed Affordable Dwelling, Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/04673/FUL North Of Trefoil, Cleeton Lane, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Cleeton St Mary, Shropshire Land East Of New House Farm, Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 16/02085/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Hatton, Hinstock, Shropshire dwellings. Proposed Agricultural Workers Dwelling SW Of Lipley Farm, Moss Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/01866/OUT 1 0 1 1 0 0 Lane, Chipnall, Cheswardine, dwellings. Shropshire Land To The South East Of Tawny, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 18/04324/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Websters Lane, Hodnet, Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Land To The South Of Tawny, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 18/04326/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Websters Lane, Hodnet, Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Land To The North East Of Tawny, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 18/04327/FUL 1 0 1 1 0 0 Websters Lane, Hodnet, Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Former Swan Public House Car Park, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 18/05854/FUL Nantwich Road, Woore, Crewe, 4 0 4 4 0 0 Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Shropshire, CW3 9SA Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural Blossom View, Eaton Upon Tern, dwellings. 19/00604/FUL Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 1 0 1 1 0 0 Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 2BX Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Proposed Dwelling At Ladyoak, Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/00670/FUL Drury Lane, Minsterley, Shrewsbury, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire

Rock House Inn, Much Wenlock Conversion of an existing building, including barns. 15/04010/FUL Road, Farley, Much Wenlock, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, TF13 6NX Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Proposed Affordable Dwelling To Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 18/04672/FUL The West Of Church Preen, Church 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Stretton, Shropshire (Miners Cottage), Middle Forest, Conversion of existing building. 13/04770/FUL Wern Y Wiel, Treflach, Oswestry, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire, SY10 9HT Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Lynstead, Bellan Lane, Trefonen, 14/02994/FUL Conversion of existing building. 1 0 1 1 0 0 Oswestry, Shropshire, SY10 9DQ Residential Development Land 17/05237/OUT North Of The Miners Arms, Morda Conversion of existing building. 9 0 9 9 0 0 Bank, Morda, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Sites within a settlements development boundary 18/02326/OUT Adjacent Bank Cottage, Pant, 2 0 2 2 0 0 within the SAMDev Plan. Shropshire Proposed Residential Development Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. 18/02928/FUL Adj. Magistrates Court, Holbache Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 10 0 10 10 0 0 Road, Oswestry, SY11 1RJ Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Proposed Residential Conversion, Conversion of an existing building, including barns. 18/03113/FUL Magistrates Court, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 10 0 10 10 0 0 Holbache Road, Oswestry, SY11 1RJ Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

D2 Appendix D: Sites with a 'resolution to grant' Planning Permission as at 31st March 2019 Planning Application Resolution to Grant Information Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2018) Beyond Plan Period

Planning Net Net Address Deliverability Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Application Completions Outstanding Proposed Dwelling Adj Hopton Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 14/05257/FUL Farm, Nesscliffe, Shrewsbury, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire Basement At Hairdressing Studio, 1A 15/02594/FUL Fish Street, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Conversion of existing building. 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY1 1UR Land North East Of Upper House Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 17/02021/FUL Farm , Longnor, Shrewsbury, 2 0 2 2 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural Proposed Affordable Dwelling To dwellings. 17/02420/FUL The East Of Rodefern Lane, Great 1 0 1 1 0 0 Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Ness, Montford Bridge, Shropshire Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Land West Of Wingfield Cottage, Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural 17/05964/FUL Montford Bridge, Shrewsbury, 1 0 1 1 0 0 dwellings. Shropshire The Square, Great Ryton, 18/03486/FUL Conversion of an existing building, including barns. 4 0 4 4 0 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 7LN

Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural Land At Sleap, Harmer Hill, dwellings. 18/04846/OUT 1 0 1 1 0 0 Shropshire Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

Land East Of Black Park Road, Black 13/01405/OUT Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. 60 0 60 10 25 25 60 0 0 Park, Whitchurch, Shropshire Proposed Residential Development South Of The Gables Farm, Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 14/03664/FUL 9 0 9 9 0 0 Calverhall Road, Ightfield, Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019). Shropshire Land At Prees Industrial Estate, 17/05815/FUL Shrewsbury Street, Prees, Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. 13 0 13 13 0 0 Whitchurch, Shropshire, SY13 2DJ Bon Accueil, The Broadlands, 18/00002/VAR Alkington, Whitchurch, Shropshire, Conversion of an existing building. 1 0 1 1 0 0 SY13 3NE 315 299 15 0

10% Reduction: 30 10% Reduction: 2 10% Reduction: 0 Total: 269 Total: 14 Total: 0

Justification: Existing Local Plan sites or proposed SAMDev Plan sites. Sites within a settlements development boundary where the settlement has been identified as a suitable location for infill/windfall development within the SAMDev Plan. Affordable housing / rural worker / agricultural dwellings. Conversion of an existing building, including barns. Selected redevelopment of brownfield sites. Resolution to grant subject to completion of a S106 Legal Agreement (completed post 31/03/2019).

D3

Appendix E. Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Represented through the site Represented through the site allocation process. allocation process. Represented through the site No known impediments to the No known impediments to the allocation process. availability of the site. availability of the site. No known impediments to the Development company Development company availability of the site. Land at White established. established. No known viability Development company ALB002 Allocated site. 60 0 60 0 10 25 35 25 25 Acres, Albrighton Willing landowners for whole Willing landowners for whole concerns. established. site. site. Willing landowners for whole site. Phases 1 and 2 of the site Phases 1 and 2 of the site Phases 1 and 2 of the site benefit benefit from Planning benefit from Planning from Planning Permission and Permission and development Permission and development development has commenced. has commenced. has commenced.

Small greenfield site within village Site promoted through the site development boundary. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Sustainable development. No allocation process. No known impediments to the fundamental planning issues. Outline Permission granted availability of the site. Likely to be delivered. Land East of Shaw and Reserved Matters pending No known viability ALB003 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. Outline Permission granted and 17 0 17 17 17 0 0 Lane, Albrighton consideration for the first concerns. Outline Permission granted Reserved Matters pending phase of development. and Reserved Matters pending consideration for the first phase of Second phase expected to consideration for the first development. follow on. phase of development. Second phase expected to follow on. Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation process. Planning Application Schoolhouse Lane allocation process. No known viability BISH013 Allocated site. No known impediments to the (19/04444/FUL) pending 40 0 40 10 15 15 40 0 0 East, Bishop's Castle Indicative layout submitted to concerns availability of the site. consideration for 55 dwellings. demonstrate delivery. Single landowner.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Brownfield site within settlement. Full Planning Application Site promoted through the site Phosphate stripping technology pending consideration for 50 allocation process. designed to reduce phosphate by dwellings on part of the site. Known viability Site in Clun catchment area, 75% from sewage treatment The total site capacity is 70 constraints. Any however phosphate stripping works discharging to the Clun river dwellings. issues have been Timber/Station technology designed to reduce catchment now installed at the BUCK001 Allocated site. Site in Clun catchment area, overcome by 70 0 70 10 10 10 10 40 10 10 20 10 10 Yard, Bucknell phosphate by 75% from Clun sewage works. however phosphate stripping increasing number of sewage treatment works Planning Application technology designed to reduce dwellings through an discharging to the Clun river (13/03241/FUL) currently pending phosphate by 75% from extension of the site. catchment now installed at consideration. Development sewage treatment works the Clun sewage works. consortium promoting site. Likely discharging to the Clun river to be delivered 2020/21 onwards. catchment now installed at the Clun sewage works.

Straightforward sustainable Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site No known viability greenfield site in single land Land to the rear of allocation process. allocation process. concerns. ownership (Estate) with Parish CHIR001 Horseshoe Road, Allocated site. No known impediments to the 30 0 30 15 15 30 0 0 Landowner proposes two Straightforward Council support. Chirbury availability of the site. phases of development. greenfield site. Landowner proposing One landowner (Estate). development in 2 phases.

E1 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Greenfield site on edge of settlement. Phosphate stripping technology Site promoted through the site designed to reduce phosphate by allocation process. 75% from sewage treatment Site promoted through the site Outline Planning Application works discharging to the Clun river allocation process. pending decision for 38 Known viability catchment now installed at the Site in Clun catchment area, dwellings. Application paused constraints overcome Clun sewage works. however phosphate stripping whilst upgrades were made to by increasing the Outline Planning Application Land at Turnpike technology designed to reduce the sewage treatment works, number of dwellings pending decision for 38 dwellings. CLUN002 Allocated site. 60 0 60 10 25 25 60 0 0 Meadow, Clun phosphate by 75% from however phosphate stripping within the The Outline Planning Application sewage treatment works technology designed to reduce development through has been subject to a HRA which discharging to the Clun river phosphate by 75% from an extension of the concluded that "Planning catchment now installed at sewage treatment works site. applications connecting to sewage the Clun sewage works. discharging to the Clun river treatment works in the Clun catchment now installed at Catchment are considered to have the Clun sewage works. no likely significant effect alone or in combination due to the upgraded phosphate stripping now installed".

Small greenfield site on edge of settlement. Highway junction improvement required. Phosphate stripping technology Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site designed to reduce phosphate by allocation process. allocation process. 75% from sewage treatment Site in Clun catchment area, Site in Clun catchment area, works discharging to the Clun river however phosphate stripping however phosphate stripping catchment now installed at the No known viability South of the technology designed to reduce technology designed to reduce Clun sewage works. concerns. Telephone phosphate by 75% from phosphate by 75% from Outline Planning Application has LYD007 Allocated site. Planning Application 8 0 8 4 4 8 0 0 Exchange, Lydbury sewage treatment works sewage treatment works been subject to a HRA which pending decision for 8 North discharging to the Clun river discharging to the Clun river concluded that "Planning dwellings. catchment now installed at catchment now installed at applications connecting to sewage the Clun sewage works. the Clun sewage works. treatment works in the Clun Planning Application pending Planning Application pending Catchment are considered to have decision for 8 dwellings. decision for 8 dwellings. no likely significant effect alone or in combination due to the upgraded phosphate stripping now installed". Planning Application pending decision for 8 dwellings.

Small greenfield site on edge of Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site settlement. allocation process. allocation process. Phosphate stripping technology Site in Clun catchment area, Site in Clun catchment area, designed to reduce phosphate by however phosphate stripping however phosphate stripping 75% from sewage treatment technology designed to reduce technology designed to reduce North of the works discharging to the Clun river phosphate by 75% from phosphate by 75% from Telephone No known viability catchment now installed at the LYD008 Allocated site. sewage treatment works sewage treatment works 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 Exchange, Lydbury concerns. Clun sewage works. discharging to the Clun river discharging to the Clun river North Highway junction improvement catchment now installed at catchment now installed at required. the Clun sewage works. the Clun sewage works. Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application granted for 5 dwellings post 31st granted for 5 dwellings post granted for 5 dwellings post March 2019. 31st March 2019. 31st March 2019. Likely to be delivered.

E2 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Small brownfield site within Site promoted through the site settlement. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Phosphate stripping technology allocation process. Site in Clun catchment area, designed to reduce phosphate by Site in Clun catchment area, however phosphate stripping 75% from sewage treatment however phosphate stripping technology designed to reduce works discharging to the Clun river technology designed to reduce Contaminated site. phosphate by 75% from catchment now installed at the phosphate by 75% from Viability addressed by Former Garage, sewage treatment works Clun sewage works. LYD009 Allocated site. sewage treatment works type and layout of 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 Lydbury North discharging to the Clun river Former garage site, so ground discharging to the Clun river residential catchment now installed at contamination requiring catchment now installed at development. the Clun sewage works. remediation, considered the Clun sewage works. Former garage site, so ground achievable. Single landowner. contamination requiring Viability addressed by type and Garage in short term storage remediation, considered layout of residential development. use - no legal impediment. achievable. Likely to be delivered outside the five year period.

Small greenfield site on edge of Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site settlement. allocation process. allocation process. Phosphate stripping technology Site in Clun catchment area, Site in Clun catchment area, designed to reduce phosphate by however phosphate stripping however phosphate stripping 75% from sewage treatment technology designed to reduce technology designed to reduce works discharging to the Clun river Land adjacent to phosphate by 75% from phosphate by 75% from No known viability catchment now installed at the LYD011 Church Close, Allocated site. sewage treatment works sewage treatment works 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 concerns. Clun sewage works. Lydbury North discharging to the Clun river discharging to the Clun river Highway junction improvement catchment now installed at catchment now installed at required. the Clun sewage works. the Clun sewage works. Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application granted for 4 dwellings post 31st granted for 4 dwellings post granted for 4 dwellings post March 2019. 31st March 2019. 31st March 2019. Likely to be delivered.

Site on edge of town including redevelopment of Livestock Market site - sustainable development with no fundamental planning issues Major project but Site promoted through the site affecting suitability. New junction housing cross- allocation process. onto A458 required. New junction onto A458 required. subsidises Whilst linked to relocation of Linked to relocation of Livestock infrastructure Livestock Market, redevelopment Market although redevelopment of investment, BRID20b (and associated BRID020a) Site promoted through the site of BRID20b (and associated relocation of livestock not dependent on the relocation allocation process. BRID020a) not dependent on the Land North of market and provision happening in advance. Site promoter is the principal relocation happening in advance. BRID001/BRID020b Wenlock Road, Allocated site. The intention is to first develop of serviced 200 0 200 20 63 63 146 54 54 0 employment land/buildings Site promoted by principal Tasley, Bridgnorth BRID020b to provide the capital for employment land. further works. Residential provider in Bridgnorth with employment land/buildings Residential development on this component of track record of delivery. provider in Bridgnorth with track development on part the site to progress before the record of delivery. relocation of the Livestock Market. of this site (BRID020b) Detailed site investigations in Single major landowner (Tasley can occur prior to the hand prior to submission of Estates) including site for relocation relocation of the of Livestock Market. planning application. livestock market. Likely to be delivered over years 3- 6. Build rates are informed by the deliverability statement produced by the landowner.

E3 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site on edge of town - sustainable development with no fundamental planning issues affecting suitability. Access to the Major project linked site through BRID001/BRID020b. Site promoted through the site to BRID001 and Intention is to commence allocation process. BRID020b but housing BRID020b, with BRID001 and Access to the site through cross-subsidises BRID020a following on. Works can Site promoted through the site BRID001/BRID020b. infrastructure commence prior to the relocation allocation process. The intention is to first investment, of the Livestock Market. Access to the site through Land North of develop BRID020b to provide relocation of livestock Single major landowner (Tasley BRID001/BRID020b. BRID020a Church Lane, Tasley, Allocated site. the capital for further works. market and provision Estates) including site for 300 0 300 0 9 63 72 228 228 Site promoted by principal Bridgnorth Residential development on of serviced relocation of Livestock Market. employment land/buildings this component of the site to employment land. Housing cross-subsidises provider in Bridgnorth with progress before the relocation Residential infrastructure investment, track record of delivery. of the Livestock Market. development on this relocation of livestock market and Single major landowner site can commence provision of serviced employment (Tasley Estates). before relocation of land. Likely to be delivered from the livestock market. year 6 onwards, following BRID20b and BRID001. Build rates are informed by the deliverability statement produced by the landowner.

Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site site in sustainable settlement. Land opposite 6 allocation process. allocation process. No known viability Outline and Reserved Matters DITT005 Station Road, Ditton Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 concerns. Planning Applications granted for Priors Planning Applications granted Planning Applications granted 16 dwellings. for 16 dwellings. for 16 dwellings. High likelihood of delivery. The Pheasant Inn, Development NEE001 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Neenton completed. Shropshire Council owned school playing field – Shropshire Council owned school Dependent on land development dependent on playing field – development exchange values, cost provision of replacement Site promoted through the site dependent on provision of of provision of School Playing facilities involving land allocation process. replacement facilities involving replacement facilities CSTR018 Fields, Church Allocated site. exchange. Revised scheme layout land exchange. 37 0 37 20 17 37 0 0 and housing yield. Stretton Application pending indicates capacity for 37 Application pending consideration Discussions suggest consideration on the site. dwellings. on the site. Revised scheme layout that the development Revised scheme layout indicates capacity for 37 will be viable. indicates capacity for 37 dwellings. dwellings. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Greenfield site on the edge of the Two landowners - agreement Site promoted through the site Outline and Reserved Battlefield to rear of settlement, within the settlement in place. allocation process. Matters Planning Oaks Road/Alison boundary. CSTR019 Allocated site. No known impediments to the Outline and Reserved Matters Permissions granted 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Church Outline and Reserved Matters availability of the site. Planning Permissions granted on this site for 43 Stretton Planning Permissions granted on Outline and Reserved Matters on this site for 43 dwellings. dwellings. this site for 43 dwellings. Planning Permissions granted on this site for 43 dwellings.

Straightforward small greenfield site on edge of settlement, within Site promoted through the site the settlement boundary. Single allocation process. Site promoted through the site land ownership. Land off Tenbury No known impediments to the allocation process. No known viability No fundamental planning issues. CMO002 Road, Cleobury Allocated site. availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 concerns. Parish Council support. Mortimer Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted for 22 dwellings. Planning Applications granted for for 22 dwellings. 22 dwellings. Likely to be delivered.

E4 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site site on edge of settlement, within Site promoted through the site allocation process. the settlement boundary. allocation process. Adjacent allocation has Single land ownership. Land at New House Development subject to access reserved matters approval. No major viability No fundamental planning issues. CMO005 Farm, Cleobury Allocated site. 7 0 7 7 7 0 0 off Tenbury Road or via Planning application expected issues raised to date. Parish Council support. Mortimer adjoining site off Tenbury shortly and build out expected Likely to be delivered following Road (CMO002). to be completed within the 5 completion of CMO002, which year period. recently had Reserved Matters Approved.

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation process. allocation process. Straightforward greenfield site on Part of site has been Full Planning Application edge of settlement. transferred to a Registered granted for 8 dwellings. Phase 1 subject to a Full Planning Social Landlord (RSL), the Approved development has Application for 8 dwellings has Land off Little remainder is owned by the been completed. No known viability been granted and completed. KLT001 Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stocks Close, Kinlet Estate. Outline and Reserved Matters concerns. Phase 2 subject to Outline and Planning Permissions granted Planning Applications granted Reserved Matters Planning on both aspects of the site and for a further 15 dwellings. Applications granted for 15 phase 1 has been built out. Likely to be delivered. dwellings is considered likely to be No known impediments to the Total site capacity 23 delivered. availability of the site. dwellings.

Land off Watling Development CRAV002 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Street, Craven Arms completed.

Site promoted through the site Greenfield site within settlement - allocation process. sustainable development subject Indicative layout and other to widening of Watling Street and supporting information provision of new junction provided. (landowners to form part of Surface water flood risk delivery partnership), retention of Site promoted through the site affects part of combined site Significant constraints veteran trees and flood storage Land between allocation process. but can be accommodated but supporting capacity provision. CRAV003 & Watling Street and No developer involvement but through a SUDS scheme information provided, Site promoted with indicative Allocated site. 235 0 235 20 36 56 36 36 72 107 107 CRAV009 Brook Road, Craven willing landowner with track requiring all of CRAV009 for therefore the site is layout and other supporting Arms record of releasing land for provision of swales and still considered information. development of the town. balancing ponds for flood viable. No developer involvement but storage capacity. willing landowner with track Development linked to record of releasing land for provision of northern highway development of the town. access to town, and Town Council support. landowners to form part of Likely to be delivered from delivery partnership. 2022/23.

Greenfield site on edge of Site promoted through the site settlement. allocation process. Full Planning Application Some viability risk Site promoted through the site No highway access constraint (18/04931/FUL) pending resulting from allocation process. at this point on Watling Street. consideration for phase 1 of the archaeological The site is now owned by a No known impediments to the development. interest, but earlier Land off Watling developer (Shropshire Housing availability of the site. It is anticipated that phase 2 will CRAV004 & evaluation indicates Street East, Craven Allocated site. Group) who are pursuing The site is now owned by a follow on from phase 1 of the 60 0 60 10 25 25 60 0 0 CRAV010 no fundamental Arms development of the site. developer (Shropshire Housing development. constraints - potential Full Planning Application for Group) who are pursuing Known archaeological interest not impact limited to phase 1 pending development of the site. considered to raise fundamental reduction in site consideration. Full Planning Application for concerns in view of earlier capacity. phase 1 pending evaluation (1991). consideration. Town Council support. Likely to be delivered.

E5 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site Greenfield site within edge of allocation process. settlement. Sustainable Site promoted through the site No highway access constraint Land adjoining Clun development. No fundamental allocation process. at this point on Watling Street. No significant viability CRAV024 Road / Sycamore Allocated site. planning issues. Town Council 25 0 25 0 0 25 25 No known impediments to the No developer involvement but constraints. Close, Craven Arms support. Likely to be delivered availability of the site. willing landowner with track following other allocations in the record of releasing land for town. development of the town.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Detailed submission including indicative layout provided. Brownfield site on edge of Owners in negotiation with settlement. Highways Agency regarding No fundamental issues subject to A49 junction to serve suitable scheme safeguarding Site promoted through the site Land at Newington adjoining abattoir heritage value of existing allocation process. No known viability CRAV030 Farmstead, Craven Allocated site. development, with scope to buildings. 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 No known impediments to the constraints. Arms also serve this site (but site Likely to be delivered following availability of the site. has separate access in any first phase of adjoining abattoir event). Development likely to development which provides follow first phase of adjoining replacement livestock storage and abattoir development which releases site for redevelopment. provides replacement livestock storage and releases site for redevelopment.

Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site site. allocation process. allocation process. Updated Highway evidence Straightforward small Full Application granted for 4 assessed and found to Land to the West of greenfield site. dwellings on CO002b. No major viability demonstrate delivery. CO002a & CO002b Allocated site. 6 0 6 6 6 0 0 Cockshutt Full Application granted for 4 Total site capacity considered issues noted to date. Parish Council support. dwellings on CO002b. to be 10 dwellings. Full Planning Application on No known impediments to the Site promoter identified and CO002b granted with remainder availability of the site. likely to be delivered. of the site to follow on. Likely to be delivered.

Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield allocation process. Two Outline and Site promoted through the site site with no fundamental planning Site considered deliverable. Reserved Matters Land at Cockshutt allocation process. issues and Parish Council support. No known impediments to the Planning Applications House Farm and Two Outline and Reserved Two Outline and Reserved availability of the site. (two and three CO005 & CO0023 Land South of Allocated site. Matters Planning Applications Matters Planning Applications 0 0 0 0 0 0 Two Outline and Reserved dwellings Kenwick Road, (two and three dwellings (two and three dwellings Matters Planning Applications respectively) have Cockshutt respectively) have been respectively) have been approved (two and three dwellings been approved on the approved on the site. on the site. respectively) have been site. Likely to be delivered. approved on the site.

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield allocation process. allocation process. site with no fundamental planning Land South of Site considered deliverable. Full Planning Permission Planning Permission issues and Parish Council support. CO018 Chapel House Farm, Allocated site. No known impediments to the granted on the site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 granted on the site. Planning Permission granted on Cockshutt availability of the site. Site sponsored and likely to be the site. Full Planning Permission delivered towards the end of Likely to be delivered. granted on the site. the first 5 year tranche.

E6 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Straightforward small part Site promoted through the site brownfield site with no allocation process. Site promoted through the site fundamental planning issues and Landowners agent advises Ravenscroft allocation process. Parish Council support. Developer that a Planning Application for No known viability DUDH006 Haulage Site, Allocated site. Land in single ownership. indicates that a Planning 29 0 29 9 10 10 29 0 0 development of the site will concerns Dudleston Heath No known impediments to the Application for development of be shortly submitted for 29 availability of the site. the site will shortly be submitted dwellings, full delivery for 29 dwellings, full delivery expected in next 5 years. expected in next 5 years.

Major greenfield site linked to Site promoted through the site development of adjoining land for allocation process. Site promoted through the site leisure & tourism use consistent No known impediments to the allocation process. with Town Council views. availability of the site. Outline Planning Application No fundamental planning issues Land South of Outline Planning Application granted for up to 250 No known viability and site FRA completed in support ELL003a & ELL003b Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ellesmere granted for up to 250 dwellings. concerns of Outline Application dwellings. Reserved Matters Reserved Matters Application (14/04047/OUT) which has been Application pending pending consideration for granted for up to 250 dwellings. consideration for phase 1 of phase 1 of the development. Reserved Matters Application the development. pending consideration for phase 1 of the development.

Site promoted through the site Straightforward greenfield site allocation process. Site promoted through the site with no fundamental planning Site in single ownership. Viability secured Land South of allocation process. issues. TET001 Allocated site. No known impediments to the within Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cairndale, Tetchill Full Planning Application Parish Council support. availability of the site. Permission. granted for 10 dwellings. Full Planning Application granted. Full Planning Application Likely to be delivered. granted for 10 dwellings. Greenfield site with no Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site fundamental planning issues. Land adjacent to St allocation process. allocation process. No known viability Parish Council support. WFTN002 Andrew’s Church, Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Full Planning Application concerns. Full Planning Application granted Welsh Frankton No known impediments to the granted for 16 dwellings for the development. availability of the site. Likely to be delivered. Land off Rhea Development HIGH003 Hall/Coronation Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Street, Highley

Greenfield site outside bypass identified as most appropriate Site promoted through the site from alternatives available. No allocation process. fundamental planning issues. No fundamental impediments Sustainable development subject Site promoted through the site Infrastructure to the availability of the site. to site development guidelines, allocation process. requirements Known infrastructure including contributions to enable Development Company has identified from outset requirements identified from future provision of improved option on site - in discussion linked to allocation, the outset and linked to the pedestrian/cycle links over A49, if Land south of Rocks with Council on infrastructure so no viability issues. LUD017 Allocated site. allocation of the land. required, and to Eco Park to the 0 0 0 0 0 0 Green, Ludlow contributions and delivery of Part Full and Part Environmental south. Development Company has development. Outline Planning screening/scoping opinions option on land and in discussion Part Full and Part Outline Application granted submitted for development of with Council. No viability issues. Planning Application granted for up to 200 the site. Environmental screening/scoping for up to 200 dwellings. dwellings. Part Full and Part Outline opinions submitted for Planning Application granted development of the site. for up to 200 dwellings. Part Full and Part Outline Planning Application granted for up to 200 dwellings.

E7 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Greenfield site close to Eco Park to east of Bypass, forming part of a mixed use land allocation and Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site providing access to potential allocation process. allocation process. future development area - No known impediments to the Known developer interest in sustainable development availability of the site. the site. Infrastructure delivering benefits for town. Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application requirements Known developer interest in the Land east of Eco LUD034 Allocated site. granted for 80 dwellings and granted for 80 dwellings and identified from outset site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park, Ludlow employment land. Also employment land. Also linked to allocation, Outline Planning Application provides details of access. provides details of access. so no viability issues. pending decision for 80 dwellings Reserved Matters Application Reserved Matters Application and employment land. Also pending consideration for 68 pending consideration for 68 provides details of access. dwellings. dwellings. Reserved Matters Application pending consideration for 68 dwellings. Likely to be delivered.

Small site within village. Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Sustainable development. No known viability allocation process. allocation process. No fundamental planning issues. Onibury Farm, concerns (existing ONBY003 Allocated site. Site owned by Onibury Estate. Indicative layout showing site Estate owned and promoted site - 8 0 8 4 4 8 0 0 Onibury modern farm building No known impediments to the capable of delivering 8 indicative layout showing site to be removed). availability of the site. dwellings. capable of delivering 8 dwellings. Likely to be delivered.

Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site allocation process. site on edge of village inside allocation process. Outline Planning Application bypass, within the settlement No known impediments to the granted for 6 dwellings. boundary. Land West of availability of the site. Six full planning applications No known viability Outline Planning Application HIN002 Manor Farm Drive, Allocated site. Outline Planning Permission 0 0 0 0 0 0 now pending consideration on concerns. granted for 6 dwellings. Hinstock granted for 6 dwellings. this site. Subsequent series of Full Planning Subsequent series of Full Subsequent series of Full Applications granted for 5 Planning Applications granted Planning Applications granted dwellings on the site. for 5 dwellings on the site. for 5 dwellings on the site. Likely to be delivered.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Site promoted through the site Greenfield site on edge of village No known impediments to the allocation process. inside bypass and close to Land at Bearcroft, No known viability HIN009 Allocated site. availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters facilities. Outline and Reserved 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hinstock concerns. Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted Matters Planning Applications Planning Applications granted for 36 dwellings. granted for 36 dwellings. for 36 dwellings.

Land to rear of Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Greenfield site. Shrewsbury Street; allocation process. allocation process. No known impediments to the HOD009, HOD010 Land off Station No known impediments to the No known impediments to the No known viability Allocated site. availability of the site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 & HOD011 Road; and availability of the site. availability of the site. concerns. Full Planning Application granted Shrewsbury Street Full Planning Application Full Planning Application for 44 dwellings. Farm, Hodnet granted for 44 dwellings. granted for 44 dwellings.

E8 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Infrastructure provision including access from A53, but known as part of site Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation, so no allocation process. Greenfield site on edge of town allocation process. viability concerns. Development Company within A53 Bypass - sustainable No known impediments to the Two Outline Planning (Danbank Developments) development. Single point of availability of the site. Applications and a involved with promotion of access off A53 required for all the Complex land ownerships and Reserved Matters coordinated scheme over allocations that form this wider Highways Authority require a granted for up to 162 Land off Rush Lane; many years. site. Site reflects local ambitions single point of access - dwellings. and Land between Two Outline Planning for greenfield recreational MD030, MD010 & Development Company Outline Planning Croft Way and Allocated site. Applications and a Reserved facilities. No fundamental 0 0 0 0 0 0 MD028 coordinating delivery. Application pending Greenfields Lane, Matters granted for up to 162 planning issues. Complex land Two Outline Planning decision for up to 250 Market Drayton dwellings on one phase of ownerships - Development Applications and a Reserved dwellings. development. Company coordinating delivery Matters granted for up to 162 Overall development Outline Planning Application and high likelihood of delivery. dwellings on one phase. of Greenfields area pending decision for up to 250 Series of Planning Applications Outline Planning Application indicating 412 dwellings submitted/approved to bring pending decision for up to 250 dwellings, but if Total site capacity 412 forward the site. dwellings on the other phase. Greenfields dwellings. recreation facilities relocated, then potential for 600 dwellings overall.

Straightforward part brownfield Site promoted through the site site with no fundamental planning allocation process. Site promoted through the site Cost of demolition of issues. No known impediments to the allocation process. Part of land off former social club Outline and Reserved Matters availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters STH002 Dutton Close, Stoke Allocated site. building but no Planning Applications granted for 15 0 15 15 15 0 0 Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted Heath known viability 25 dwellings. - phase 1 of the Planning Applications granted for 25 dwellings. - phase 1 of concerns. development. for 25 dwellings. - phase 1 of the development. Application secured by a the development. developer. Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation process. allocation process. Cost of appropriate Single landowner. Single landowner. Phase 1: Full Planning Permission conversion and Phase 1: Full Planning Phase 1: Full Planning granted for conversion of existing buildings clearance, Permission granted for Permission granted for buildings to 7 dwellings. Hall Farm, however this has MIN002 & MIN015 Allocated site. conversion of existing conversion of existing Phase 2: Outline Planning 14 0 14 10 4 14 0 0 Minsterley been addressed as buildings to 7 dwellings. buildings to 7 dwellings. Permission pending decision for part of the Phase 2: Outline Planning Phase 2: Outline Planning up to 14 dwellings on the consideration of the Permission pending decision Permission pending decision remainder of the site. planning application. for up to 14 dwellings on the for up to 14 dwellings on the remainder of the site. remainder of the site.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Greenfield site with some Large greenfield site within Site promoted through the site constraints but no fundamental Full Planning the settlement boundary. allocation process. planning issues. HCA funding now Callow Lane, Permission granted MIN007 Allocated site. No known impediments to the Full Planning Application secured, therefore must be 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minsterley and is currently being availability of the site. granted for 55 dwellings which completed before 2018. Full built out. Planning Permission granted is currently being built out. Planning Application granted and and development is currently is being built out. being built out.

E9 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site Straightforward, largely greenfield allocation process. Site promoted through the site site in single ownership with Land in single ownership allocation process. Parish Council support. (Hereford Diocesan Board). Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application granted Planning Permission granted Planning Permission for Hall Bank, granted Planning Permission for 72 dwellings granted after No known viability PBY018 & PBY029 Allocated site. 72 dwellings granted. Full 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pontesbury for 72 dwellings granted after 31st March 2018. concerns. Planning Application granted for 31st March 2018. Full Planning Application 86 dwellings granted after 31st Full Planning Application granted for 86 dwellings March 2018. granted for 86 dwellings granted after 31st March Enabling works now commenced granted after 31st March 2018. and development started on site. 2018.

Straightforward greenfield site on Site promoted through the site edge of village with allocation process. Site promoted through the site Parish Council support. No known impediments to the allocation process. Land off Minsterley No known viability Some constraints but no PBY019 Allocated site. availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Pontesbury concerns. fundamental planning issues. Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted for 18 dwellings. Planning Applications granted for for 18 dwellings. 18 dwellings. Small greenfield site, re-allocated from Oswestry Local Plan. No No known viability fundamental planning issues or Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site concerns. significant outstanding objections. allocation process. allocation process. Outline Planning Parish Council support. Land at Southlands No known impediments to the Outline Planning Permission GOB008 Allocated site. Permission granted Outline Planning Permission 27 0 27 27 27 0 0 Avenue, Gobowen availability of the site. granted for 27 dwellings after for 27 dwellings after (18/00018/OUT) granted for 27 Outline Planning Permission the base date for this the base date for this dwellings after the base date for granted for 27 dwellings. assessment. assessment. this assessment. Delivery anticipated in year five of the period.

Large greenfield site extending existing Fletcher Homes Wat’s Site promoted through the site Meadow site (recently built out). Site promoted through the site Land between A5 allocation process. No fundamental planning issues allocation process. and Shrewsbury This site will extend and follow No known viability or significant outstanding GOB012 Allocated site. Single landowner. 90 0 90 25 25 25 75 15 15 0 railway line, on from the existing Fletcher concerns objections. Parish Council support. No known impediments to the Gobowen Homes Wat’s Meadow site This site will extend and follow on availability of the site. (recently built out). from the existing Fletcher Homes Wat’s Meadow site (recently built out) (OS/05/13887/REM).

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation process. Straightforward small greenfield allocation process. Straightforward small site with no fundamental planning Outline and Reserved Matters greenfield site. issues and Parish Council support. Land north of Lower Application granted for 17 No known viability KK001 Allocated site. No known impediments to the Likely to be delivered. 0 0 0 0 0 0 House, Knockin dwellings. concerns. availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters Agent has confirmed the site Outline and Reserved Matters Application granted for 17 will be completed in the five Application granted for 17 dwellings. year period. dwellings. Land adjacent Development KYN001 Kinnerley Primary Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. School, Kinnerley Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site allocation process. Land west of School allocation process. No known viability Full Planning Application granted KYN002 Allocated site. Land in single ownership. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Kinnerley Full Planning Application concerns. for 18 dwellings. No known impediments to the granted for 18 dwellings. availability of the site.

E10 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site Former Railway site with no fundamental planning allocation process. Land, Station Road, Site promoted through the site No known viability issues and Parish Council support. LLAN001 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 32 0 32 12 20 32 0 0 Llanymynech and allocation process. concerns. Site likely to be delivered No known impediments to the Pant following development on availability of the site. adjacent land (LLAN009).

Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site site with no fundamental planning allocation process. Site promoted through the site issues and Parish Council support. Land north of Outline and Reserved Matters allocation process. Likely to be delivered. playing fields, Applications granted for 35 No known viability LLAN009 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 Llanymynech and dwellings. concerns. No known impediments to the Applications granted for 35 Pant Agent has confirmed the site availability of the site. dwellings. will be completed in the five Site promoter endorses the year period. assumed rate of delivery. Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield allocation process. Land at Greenfields Site promoted through the site No known viability site with no fundamental planning MBK001 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 4 0 4 2 2 4 0 0 Farm, Maesbrook allocation process. concerns. issues and Parish Council support. No known impediments to the Likely to be delivered. availability of the site. Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield allocation process. Land adj. to The Site promoted through the site No known viability site with no fundamental planning MBK009 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 Smithy, Maesbrook allocation process. concerns. issues and Parish Council support. No known impediments to the Likely to be delivered. availability of the site. Site promoted through the site Greenfield site subject to Site promoted through the site Land off allocation process. comprehensive development allocation process. No known viability OSW004 Whittington Road, Allocated site. Greenfield site with some guidelines. 117 0 117 10 25 25 60 25 25 50 7 7 No known impediments to the concerns Oswestry physical constraints to be Known developer interest and availability of the site. addressed as part of layout. application expected imminently.

Very large strategic sustainable Site promoted through the site urban extension to Oswestry. allocation process. Outline planning application Outline Planning Application (16/02594/OUT) pending decision (16/02594/OUT) pending for up to 600 dwellings (covering decision for up to 600 two phases of the Oswestry SUE). dwellings (covering two Reserved Matters Application phases of the Oswestry SUE). Site promoted through the site expected to immediately follow Reserved Matters Application allocation process. grant of outline consent. It is Eastern Gateway expected to immediately Very large scale multiple land No major viability understood that the developer is OSW024 Sustainable Urban Allocated site. follow grant of outline 800 0 800 50 50 50 150 75 75 150 500 500 ownership site. issues noted to date. very keen to commence Extension, Oswestry consent. No known impediments to the development on the site. Further Outline Planning availability of the site. Further Outline Planning Application (17/06025/OUT) Application (17/06025/OUT) pending consideration for 150 pending consideration for 150 dwellings on a further phase dwellings on a further phase of of development. development. There is known interest in There is known interest in bringing bringing forward the other forward the other phase of phase of development. development.

Former Oswestry Development OSW029 Leisure Centre, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Oswestry The Cottams, Development OSW030 Morda Road, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Oswestry Alexandra Road Development OSW033 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Depot, Oswestry completed.

E11 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Greenfield site. No fundamental allocation process. allocation process. planning issues. Town Council OSW034, OSW035 Land South of the Site considered deliverable in Site considered deliverable in No major viability support. Access dependent on Allocated site. 80 0 80 0 25 25 50 30 30 & OSW045 Cemetery, Oswestry the medium term. the medium term. issues noted to date. land exchange agreement with No known impediments to the No known impediments to the Town Council so delivery expected availability of the site. achievability of the site. within years 6+.

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Brownfield site with no allocation process. allocation process. fundamental planning issues. Site in two parts: Known developer interest in No major viability A Full Planning Application for 53 The part located off the site. issues noted to date - dwellings has been granted and Whittington Road has A Full Planning Application for but brownfield site development has commenced on Richard Burbidge, planning permission and is 53 dwellings has been granted requiring clearance OSW042 Allocated site. the element of the site off 130 0 130 25 25 25 75 25 25 50 5 5 Oswestry under construction. and development has and/or re-use of Whittington Road. The part located off Unicorn commenced on the element of existing buildings. The second part is likely to follow Road is currently in the site off Whittington Road. Known developer on from the completion of this employment use, but The second part is likely to interest. element of the site - forecast as considered deliverable in the follow on from the completion years 3-8 of the supply statement. medium term. of this element of the site.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Straightforward part brownfield Site promoted through the site Site in single ownership. site. Land at allocation process. No known impediments to the No known viability Outline and Reserved Matters PARK001 Artillery/Larkhill/Par Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 availability of the site. concerns. Planning Applications granted for k Crescent, Park Hall Planning Applications granted Outline and Reserved Matters 30 dwellings. for 30 dwellings. Planning Applications granted Likely to be delivered. for 30 dwellings.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Large site allocated for a Housing forms part of Straightforward greenfield site mixed use development, a mixed use with no fundamental planning comprising of housing; Site promoted through the site development with issues. Land at Rhos y Llan employment; land for allocation process. various land and STM029 Allocated site. Outline Application granted for up 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farm, St Martins community recreation; and Outline Application granted forecast sales values. to 80 dwellings. sports pitches. No for up to 80 dwellings. Overall scheme Development likely to be fundamental legal or physical considered viable. delivered. impediments. Very active market. Outline Application granted for up to 80 dwellings.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Site promoted through the site Straightforward greenfield site Straightforward greenfield allocation process. with no fundamental planning Land adjacent to site. Site to be implemented in issues. Oakland's Drive; No known impediments to the three phases. Parish Council support. Land to rear of availability of the site. Full Planning Application Full Planning Application granted WGN001, Hershell House; Full Planning Application granted for 34 dwellings after No known viability for 34 dwellings after 31st March WGN004, WGN005 Allocated site. 86 0 86 11 25 25 25 86 0 0 Land to south east granted for 34 dwellings after 31st March 2019 (Phase 1 of concerns. 2019 (Phase 1 of the & WGN021 of School; and Land 31st March 2019 (Phase 1 of the development). development). Development has adjacent to Big the development). Outline Planning Application now commenced. House, Whittington Outline Planning Application pending decision for 52 Outline Planning Application pending decision for 52 dwellings (Phase 2 of the pending decision for 52 dwellings dwellings (Phase 2 of the development). (Phase 2 of the development). development).

Straightforward greenfield site Site promoted through the site Land South of Site promoted through the site with no fundamental planning allocation process. Brookfield’s and allocation process. No known viability issues. WRN010 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aspen Grange, Outline Planning Application concerns. Outline Planning Application for No known impediments to the Weston Rhyn for 32 dwellings granted. 32 dwellings granted. availability of the site. Likely to be delivered.

E12 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding Brownfield site with no Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site fundamental planning issues. allocation process. Land at the allocation process. No known viability Parish Council support. Outline WRN016 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sawmills, Rhoswiel Outline Planning Application concerns. Planning Application granted for No known impediments to the granted for 33 dwellings. 33 dwellings. availability of the site. Likely to be delivered. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Full Planning Application Site promoted through the site granted for 115 dwellings. Brownfield site. Planning Land south of Aston allocation process. Further Full Planning No known viability Permission granted for SHI004a Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Shifnal No known impediments to the Application granted for the concerns. development of the site. Site is availability of the site. modification of 32 plots and currently being built out at pace. 17 plots respectively. Site is currently being built out at pace.

Greenfield site on edge of the Site promoted through the site town. allocation process. Site promoted through the site Outline Planning Outline and Land between No known impediments to the allocation process. Reserved Matters Applications Lawton Road and availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters No known viability SHI004b & SHI004c Allocated site. secured for 99 dwellings and a 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stanton Road, Outline and Reserved Matters Applications secured for 99 concerns. bed extra care facility. Shifnal Applications secured for 99 dwellings and a 70 bed extra Delivery likely following dwellings and a 70 bed extra care facility. completion of adjacent site care facility. (SHI004a).

Sustainable development subject to suitable highways and transport mitigation measures. Outline Planning Application Site promoted through the site granted for 250 dwellings and Site promoted through the site allocation process. subsequently a further Outline allocation process. The entirety of the site has Application was granted for No known impediments to the Outline Planning Permission, dwellings not yet subject to a Land north of availability of the site. phases 1 and 3 also have No known viability Reserved Matters Application. SHI006 Wolverhampton Allocated site. The entirety of the site has Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 concerns. Reserved Matters Application Road, Shifnal Outline Planning Permission, Applications. granted for 75 dwellings (phase 1 phases 1 and 3 also have It is anticipated that phases 1 of the development). Reserved Matters and 3 will be constructed and Resered Matters Application Applications. the remainder of the site will granted for 70 dwellings (phase 3). then follow on. Reserved Matters Applications granted for the site infrastrucutre and landscaping. Likely to be delivered.

Land at rear of Development BAS005 Wheatland's Estate, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Shrewsbury Straightforward greenfield site in centre of village. Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site No known viability Outline Planning Application allocation process. allocation process. concerns. granted for 30 dwellings (including Land to the west of Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Application Land for medical provision of land for new medical BAS017 Shrewsbury Road, Allocated site. granted for 30 dwellings and a granted for 30 dwellings and a 0 0 0 0 0 0 centre offered by centre). Baschurch medical centre. medical centre. landowners linked to Full Application for access No known impediments to the Full Application for access allocation of site. subsequently approved. availability of the site. subsequently approved. Parish Council support. Likely to be delivered. Land to rear of Development BAS025 Medley Farm, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Shrewsbury

E13 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Greenfield site with access allocation process. allocation process. available from Station Road. No known impediments to the Scope to provide school drop Scope to provide school drop off availability of the site. off zone, if required. zone, if required. Land at Station Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application No known viability Outline Planning Application BAS035 Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury approved for up to 40 approved for up to 40 concerns granted for up to 40 dwellings. dwellings. dwellings. Reserved Matters application Reserved Matters application Reserved Matters application pending decision for 52 dwellings. pending decision for 52 pending decision for 52 Parish Council support. dwellings. dwellings. Site likely to be delivered.

Site promoted through the site Development of former recreation allocation process. Site promoted through the site ground. Parish Council support. Land off Outline and Reserved Matters allocation process. No known viability Developer involvement. Outline BOM004/R Shrewsbury Road, Allocated site. Planning Applications granted 0 0 0 0 0 0 No known impediments to the concerns and Reserved Matters Planning Bomere Heath for up to 34 dwellings. availability of the site. Applications granted for up to 34 Developer involvement dwellings. Likely to be delivered. (Gallier Homes). Site promoted through the site allocation process. No known viability Land in single ownership. Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site concerns. No known impediments to the site with no fundamental planning allocation process. Outline Planning availability of the site. issues and Parish Council support. Land east of the Outline Planning Permission Permission granted Outline Planning Permission Outline Planning Permission CON005 Shrewsbury Road, Allocated site. granted for 3 dwellings. for 3 dwellings. 0 0 0 0 0 0 granted for 3 dwellings after granted for 3 dwellings. Condover Reserved Matters Planning Reserved Matters the base date for the Reserved Matters Planning Permission granted for plots 1 Planning Permission assessment. Permission granted for plots 1 and and 3. granted for plots 1 Reserved Matters Planning 3. and 3. Permission granted for plots 1 and 3.

Site promoted through the site No known viability allocation process. concerns. Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield Land in single ownership. Outline Planning allocation process. site with no fundamental planning No known impediments to the Permission granted Outline Planning Permission issues and Parish Council support. availability of the site. for 5 dwellings. Land opposite granted for 5 dwellings. Outline Planning Permission CON006 Allocated site. Outline Planning Permission Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 School, Condover Reserved Matters Application granted for 5 dwellings. Reserved granted for 5 dwellings. Application now now pending consideration for Matters Application now pending Reserved Matters Application pending four of the proposed consideration for four of the now pending consideration for consideration for four dwellings. proposed dwellings. four of the proposed of the proposed dwellings. dwellings.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Site promoted through the site Preferred access is by a spur allocation process. road off Forge Way through Developer which promoted Small greenfield site within the adjoining site, but the site no longer actively Negotiation of settlement boundary. Parish Land off Forge Way, Development Company pursuing site, but preferred access, not Council support. DOR004 Allocated site. 15 0 15 15 15 0 0 Dorrington controlling this confirms that Development Company considered Full Planning Application this access is negotiable and controlling preferred access insurmountable. (17/04926/FUL) for 26 dwellings not an impediment. assures Council that this is pending consideration. Therefore no known negotiable, therefore site impediments to the remains achievable. availability of the site. Site promoted through the site Straightforward small greenfield Land to the rear of allocation process. Site promoted through the site No known viability site with no fundamental planning DOR017 the Old Vicarage, Allocated site. Land in single ownership. 15 0 15 15 15 0 0 allocation process. concerns. issues and Parish Council support. Dorrington No known impediments to the Site likely to be delivered. availability of the site.

E14 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site Single landowner. site. allocation process. Land west of school, No known impediments to the No known viability Outline and Reserved Matters HAN011/R Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hanwood availability of the site. concerns. Planning Applications granted for Planning Applications granted Outline and Reserved Matters up to 25 dwellings. for up to 25 dwellings. Planning Applications granted Likely to be delivered. for up to 25 dwellings.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Straightforward small greenfield Site promoted through the site Single landowner. site. Land West of allocation process. NESS004 & Outline and Reserved Matters No known viability Outline and Reserved Matters Holyhead Road, Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 NESS012 Planning Applications granted concerns. Planning Applications granted for Nesscliffe Planning Applications granted for up to 43 dwellings. up to 43 dwellings. for up to 43 dwellings. No known impediments to the Likely to be delivered. availability of the site.

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Straightforward greenfield site Council leading self-build owned by Shropshire Council. Self- Site promoted through the site housing project. build housing scheme being allocation process. Indicative layout for 48 Viability of individual actively progressed. Extended Single landowner. dwellings (excluding the one units will depend Land north of delivery period to reflect gradual No known impediments to the dwelling already upon build method. SHREW001 London Road, Allocated site. development through self-build. 48 0 48 6 6 6 6 24 6 6 12 12 12 availability of the site. approved/completed). However it is Shrewsbury Full Planning Permission granted Full Planning Permission Funding obtained. considered that the for a single dwelling on the site. granted for a single dwelling Full Planning Permission site will be delivered. Outline planning application to be on the site. granted for a single dwelling submitted shortly for the on the site. development of the wider site. Outline planning application to be submitted shortly. Principle of development established in Core Strategy. Site promoted through the site Comprehensive development in allocation process. accordance with adopted Infrastructure costs and masterplan to include 750 contributions agreed, with dwellings and the provision of Major infrastructure main landowners (including new Oxon Link Road and other requirements, Yes, although a major Shropshire Council) working infrastructure. including provision of development requiring collaboratively towards An Outline Application for Phase 1 new Oxon Link Road, complex S106 Agreements and delivery. of the site granted permission but land identified in involvement of a number of Highways Authority has (only landscaping reserved). Core Strategy on this landowners, the primary accepted principle of up to National housebuilder SHREW002, basis and costs to be landowners are working 400 dwellings accessed off involvement in phases 1 and 2. SHREW035, Shrewsbury West reflected in land collaboratively to deliver the Welshpool Road prior to Infrastructure costs and SHREW083, Sustainable Urban Allocated site. values so no viability 750 0 750 15 38 57 57 167 76 76 152 431 431 development. construction of new Link Road, contributions agreed, with main SHREW128, ELR64, Extension issues. Outline Planning Application so no legal or physical landowners (including Shropshire ELR67 & ELR68 Local Economic pending decision for 296 impediment to first phases of Council) working collaboratively Partnership (LEP) dwellings. This represents development. towards delivery. grant offer towards phase 1 of the site and has Outline Planning Application Development is forecast to elements of highways national housebuilder pending decision for 296 commence in year 2 as follows: costs, subject to involvement. dwellings. This represents Year 2 - Half a years build by a detailed business phase 1 of the site and has single developer on phase 1. case approval. national housebuilder Year 3 - Full years build by a single involvement. developer on phase 1. Total site capacity 750 Years 4-5 - Full years build by a dwellings. single developer on phases 1 and 2 (cautious rate of delivery assumed for the two developers). Land off Hillside Development SHREW016 Drive, Belvidere, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Shrewsbury Land at Corner Farm Development SHREW023 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drive, Shrewsbury completed.

E15 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site allocation process. Site promoted through the site Suitable location on edge of allocation process. Major greenfield site for town - sustainable Land in ownership of two Hybrid Planning coordinated development in two Land at Weir Hill development with no national house builders Application granted linked parts. Hybrid Planning Farm/Robertsford fundamental planning issues. (Taylor Wimpey and permission and Application granted permission House, Preston National housebuilders Taylor SHREW027 Allocated site. Persimmon Homes). commenced (total of for a total of 600 dwellings, phase 0 0 0 0 0 0 Street and adjoining Wimpey and Persimmon Hybrid Planning Application 600 dwellings, 353 of 1 for 353 dwellings has full Land off London Homes own the site. granted permission and which are full and 247 consent and phase 2 for 247 Road, Shrewsbury Hybrid Planning Application commenced (total of 600 outline). dwellings has outline consent). granted permission and dwellings, 353 of which are Work started on site. commenced (total of 600 full and 247 outline). dwellings, 353 of which are full and 247 outline).

Principle of development established in Core Strategy. Comprehensive development in Site promoted through the site accordance with adopted allocation process. masterplan to include Site promoted through the site Infrastructure costs and approximately 950 dwellings, allocation process. contributions identified and Major infrastructure employment land and related Development consists of three apportioned. requirements but infrastructure. SHREW028, phases. No legal or physical land identified in Core A Full Planning Application was SHREW029, Series of Planning Permissions Shrewsbury South impediments to development. Strategy on this basis granted (phase 1) for 291 SHREW075, secured across the site, Sustainable Urban Series of Planning Permissions and costs to be dwellings, progressing at pace. SHREW107, Allocated site. including two Full Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extension, secured across the site, reflected in land An outline planning application SHREW114, Permissions (Phases 1 and 3) Shrewsbury including two Full Planning values so no viability was granted (phase 2) for 500 SHREW127, ELR02 and an Outline Planning Permissions (Phases 1 and 3) issues. dwellings. Reserved Matters & ELR66 Permission with a series of and an Outline Planning Applications for two sub-phases of associated Reserved Matters Permission with a series of housing, engineering works, Applications for sub-phases associated Reserved Matters access, attenuation ponds granted (phase 2). Applications for sub-phases and works commenced. (phase 2). A further full planning application (phase 3) for 159 dwellings has been granted and development commenced.

Land off Ellesmere Development SHREW073 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury completed.

E16 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding No know viability concerns. Access to the site can be achieved and public transport infrastructure incorporated to Site promoted through the site increase the allocation process. sustainability of any Greenfield site within built up development. area – sustainable The southern development. Site promoted through the site boundary of the Part of mixed use allocation allocation process. allocation adjoins a Greenfield site within a built up Land west of subject to some constraints Development will occur SHREW095 and separate employment area - sustainable development. Battlefield Road, Allocated site. including flood risk and independently of the adjacent 0 0 0 0 0 0 SHREW115 site expected to be Outline Planning Application for Shrewsbury existing industry on southern employment allocation. developed as part of 100 dwellings granted. edge and railway to west, but Outline Planning Application the existing no fundamental planning for 100 dwellings granted. employment area. issues to prevent delivery of Investigation of flood housing on site. risk in relation to Outline Planning Application Battlefield Brook for 100 dwellings granted. required. No fundamental planning issues to prevent delivery of housing on site. Outline Planning Application for 100

Site promoted through the site No known viability Greenfield site within the allocation process. Site promoted through the site concerns. settlement boundary and a built No known impediments to the allocation process. Outline and Reserved up area - sustainable availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters Matters Planning development. Land off Shillingston SHREW105 Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted Applications granted Outline and Reserved Matters 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drive, Shrewsbury Planning Applications granted for 250 dwellings and for 250 dwellings and Planning Applications granted for for 250 dwellings and development has commenced development has 250 dwellings and development development has commenced and is progressing at pace. commenced and is has commenced and is and is progressing at pace. progressing at pace. progressing at pace.

Land East of Development SHREW120/R Woodcote Way, Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 completed. Shrewsbury Ditherington Flaxmill The Council consider this scheme is a recognised continues to be NPPF Footnote 11 Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site heritage asset. The compliant. A masterplan for the allocation process. allocation process. development of the site has been agreed. Historic England is leading the Historic England is leading the site, seeks to ensure Historic England is leading the project, which will be project, which will be the renovation and project, which will be delivered in delivered in phases. delivered in phases. safeguarding of the phases. Phase 1 - a new build element. Phase 1 - a new build element. mill by providing an Phase 1 - a new build element. Phase 2 - restoration of the Phase 2 - restoration of the appropriate use of Phase 2 - restoration of the Main Main Mill and redevelopment Main Mill and redevelopment the mill and the Mill and redevelopment of the of the remaining historic of the remaining historic surrounding land. remaining historic buildings has buildings has commenced and buildings has commenced and Significant funding commenced and some elements some elements have been some elements have been Land at has been secured for have been completed. completed. completed. Ditherington this project and works The marketing of the Main Mill SHREW198 Allocated site. The phases can occur The phases can occur 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flaxmill, to many of the scheme and the new build alongside each other. alongside each other. Shrewsbury existing buildings commenced in 2017 with delivery Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application have commenced expected in 2019/20 on both granted for 120 dwellings. granted for 120 dwellings. and/or been these phases of the scheme. Further Full Planning Further Full Planning completed. £12.8m of Heritage Lottery Applications granted for works Applications granted for works Historic England is Funding has already been offered to the main mill, dye and stove to the main mill, dye and stove now leading the and the Marches LEP has houses and silos. Works on houses and silos. Works on project, which will be identified the scheme as a priority each of these buildings have each of these buildings have delivered in phases: project. The 10 year period for either commenced or been either commenced or been phase 1 - a new build Reserved Matters reflects the completed. completed. element; phase 2 - potential for a phased approach No known impediments to the No known impediments to the restoration of the to delivery rather than an availability of the site. availability of the site. Main Mill and indication of the likely redevelopment of the commencement of development.

E17 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Infrastructure and land requirements all identified as part of Site promoted through the site site allocation allocation process. Site promoted through the site process, so no Large greenfield site, within the No known impediments to the allocation process. viability issues. settlement boundary. Outline and availability of the site. Outline and Reserved Matters Bowbrook/Radbroo Outline and Reserved Reserved Matters Planning SHREW210/09, Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted k, land between Matters Planning Applications granted for 425 SHREW030/R, Planning Applications granted for 425 dwellings. Mytton Oak Road Allocated site. Applications granted dwellings. 0 0 0 0 0 0 SHREW094 & for 425 dwellings. Full Planning Application and Hanwood Road, for 425 dwellings. Full Planning Application granted SHREW019 Full Planning Application granted for the erection of 118 Shrewsbury Full Planning for the erection of 118 dwellings. granted for the erection of 118 dwellings. Application granted Works have commenced and are dwellings. Works have commenced and for the erection of progressing at pace. Works have commenced and are progressing at pace. 118 dwellings. are progressing at pace. Works have commenced and are progressing at pace.

Site promoted through the site Large greenfield site. Developer Site promoted through the site allocation process. involvement – Wyro Homes has Land west of allocation process. Outline and Reserved Matters No major viability secured Outline and Reserved SHREW212/09 Longden Road, Allocated site. Large greenfield site. Planning Applications granted issues raised by the Matters Planning Applications for 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrewsbury No known impediments to the for 175 dwellings. applicant. 175 dwellings. Development has availability of the site. Development has commenced commenced and is progressing at and is progressing at pace. pace.

Land between Manor Farm and Development UFF006/10 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Top Cottages, completed. Uffington Site promoted through the site allocation process. Site promoted through the site Greenfield site. Land to the rear of Site in single ownership. allocation process. Outline and Full Planning Brickyard Farm, No known impediments to the No known viability SHAW004 Allocated site. Outline and Full Planning Application for 50 dwellings 0 0 0 0 0 0 Poynton Road, availability of the site. concerns. Permission granted for up to granted. Shawbury Outline and Full Planning 50 dwellings. Likely to be delivered. Permission granted for up to 50 dwellings. Greenfield site with no fundamental planning issues. Site promoted through the site Likely to be delivered. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Active interest in developing a allocation process. Land off Pyms Road, Active interest in developing a No known viability scheme for the site which is likely WEM003 Allocated site. Site in single ownership. 100 0 100 25 25 25 75 25 25 0 Wem scheme for the site which is concerns. to result in a Planning Application No known impediments to the likely to result in a Planning shortly. availability of the site. Application shortly. First completions anticipated to follow quickly behind achieving consent. Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Straightforward greenfield site. allocation process. allocation process. Outline and Reserved Matters Land off Roden Site in single ownership. No known viability WEM012 Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted for 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grove, Wem Outline and Reserved Matters concerns. Planning Applications granted 25 dwellings. Planning Applications granted for 25 dwellings. Likely to be delivered. for 25 dwellings. Small greenfield site on edge of Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site village within the settlement allocation process. allocation process. boundary. No fundamental Land West of Ash No known viability ASHP002 Allocated site. No known impediments to the Full Planning Application planning issues. Full Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parva concerns. availability of the site. granted for the erection of 8 Application granted for 8 Site in single ownership. dwellings. dwellings which is currently being built out.

E18 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Primarily brownfield site in Community Cluster located on Brownfield site but no A41/A49. Development subject to significant viability use of existing vehicular access off Site promoted through the site issues known. A41/A49. allocation process. Planning Applications Site promoted through the site Parish Council support. Planning Applications covering covering this site and allocation process. Planning Applications covering Former Cherry Tree this site and a significant a significant Site in single ownership. this site and a significant PH004 Hotel and adjoining Allocated site. additional area were additional area were 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 Willing landowner. additional area were withdrawn land, Prees Heath withdrawn and refused withdrawn and No known impediments to the and refused respectively. It is respectively. It is considered refused respectively. availability of the site. considered that a viable scheme that a viable scheme remains It is considered that a remains possible on the allocated possible on the allocated site. viable scheme site. remains possible on Likely to be delivered, but likely to the allocated site. be towards the end of the 5 year period.

Site promoted through the site Greenfield site centrally located in allocation process. village - sustainable development. Access off Shrewsbury Street No fundamental planning issues. subject to demolition of Access off Shrewsbury Street existing dwelling owned by Site promoted through the site subject to demolition of existing Shropshire Housing Group, allocation process. dwelling owned by Shropshire which has confirmed its Full Planning Application Housing Group, which has Land West of support. granted for 2 dwellings on the No known viability confirmed its support. PRE002-011-012 Shrewsbury Street, Allocated site. 22 0 22 2 10 10 22 0 0 Multiple ownerships but site. Outline Planning concerns. Multiple ownerships but jointly Prees jointly promoted, therefore no Permission granted for 5 promoted. legal or physical impediments. dwellings. Total site capacity Full Planning Permissions granted Full Planning Application 30 dwellings. for 1 and 2 dwellings respectively granted for 2 dwellings on the and an Outline Planning site. Outline Planning Permission granted for 5 Permission granted for 5 dwellings, total site capacity 30 dwellings. dwellings.

Greenfield development in centre Development linked of village and close to facilities. to restoration of Site promoted through the site No fundamental planning issues. Site promoted through the site Prees Hall. allocation process. Development subject to suitable allocation process. Number of dwellings Land at Moreton Development dependent on scheme delivering restoration of PRE008 Allocated site. Willing landowner. increased from 30 to 40 0 40 0 20 20 40 0 Street, Prees legal agreement for Prees Hall and provision of Scheme supported by Viability 40 to reflect viability restoration of Prees Hall. replacement open space. Parish Report. issues raised in Willing landowner. Council support. independent Viability Delivery spread over years 6 and Report. 7.

Site promoted through the site Site promoted through the site Greenfield site within the Land at the allocation process. allocation process. No known viability settlement boundary. Outline TIL001 Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vicarage, Tilstock Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application concerns. Planning Application granted for granted for 25 dwellings. granted for 25 dwellings. the development. Greenfield site to the north of the Site promoted through the site village within the settlement allocation process. Site promoted through the site boundary. Land at Tilstock No known impediments to the allocation process. No known viability Outline Planning Application TIL002 Allocated site. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Close, Tilstock availability of the site. Planning Application pending concerns. granted and Reserved Matters Planning Application pending consideration. Planning Application pending consideration. consideration. Delivery likely in years 4-5. Land at Russell Development TIL008 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 House, Tilstock completed.

E19 Appendix E: Sites allocated for development within the Development Plan Allocation Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Years 6-7: Forecasting (at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Allocation Net Net Net Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference Dwellings Completions Outstanding

Site promoted through the site Foul sewerage Major greenfield site. allocation process. capacity upgrade Outline Planning Application Outline Planning Application required for complete granted for up to 500 dwellings. Site promoted through the site granted for up to 500 build out of Reserved Matters Planning allocation process. dwellings. development. Application granted for the first Outline Planning Application Reserved Matters Planning Agreement regarding phase (156 dwellings). Land at Tilstock granted for up to 500 Application granted for the WHIT009 Allocated site. foul sewerage Agreement regarding foul 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Whitchurch dwellings. first phase (156 dwellings). capacity - permits sewerage capacity - permits Reserved Matters Planning Agreement regarding foul commencement of commencement of development Application granted for the sewerage capacity - permits development pending pending permanent upgrade by first phase (156 dwellings). commencement of permanent upgrade Welsh Water or developer. Full development pending by Welsh Water or build out subject to permanent permanent upgrade by Welsh developer. foul sewerage capacity upgrade. Water or developer.

Site promoted through the site Sustainable development. Site promoted through the site allocation process. Foul sewerage Outline and Reserved Matters allocation process. Outline and Reserved Matters capacity upgrade Planning Applications granted for Land at Alport WHIT021 Allocated site. Outline and Reserved Matters Planning Applications granted required for complete 90 dwellings. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road, Whitchurch Planning Applications granted for 90 dwellings. build out of Likely to be delivered, but full for 90 dwellings. Includes condition regarding development. build out subject to permanent foul sewerage capacity. foul sewerage capacity upgrade.

Land North of Mill Development WHIT033/10 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park, Whitchurch completed. Land at Mount Development WHIT046 Allocated site. Development completed. Development completed. Development completed. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farm, Whitchurch completed.

Site promoted through the site Greenfield site on edge of town. allocation process. Sustainable development. No known viability Part of mixed use scheme No fundamental planning issues. Land West of concerns - linkage linked to ELR033. Site promoted through the site Town Council support. WHIT051 Oaklands Farm, Allocated site. with employment 60 0 60 25 25 50 10 10 0 Development guidelines allocation process. Part of mixed use scheme linked Whitchurch land to be addressed specified for the site. to ELR033 with site development at application stage. No known impediments to the guidelines, including phasing, so availability of the site. delivery indicated over years 4-6.

3,663 1,469 814 1,380

Approved Application on at least part of the site. Approved Application on all of the site. 10% Reduction: 147 10% Reduction: 81 10% Reduction: 138 Total: 1,322 Total: 733 Total: 1,242

E20

Appendix F. Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is suitable for residential development, subject to appropriate management of any physical, The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance provision of an appropriate access to (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing the site and management of the sites relationship with the railway line (e.g. noise). Furthermore the residential development. Suitability of the site for residential lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. site is located within proximity of several TPO's therefore development is subject to an assessment development is subject to appropriate management of the confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Caravan storage, of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. physical, heritage and environmental constraints present However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a (informed by input from relevant service areas and ALB003 Station Road, acceptable safeguarding. The site is also in proximity of one or more listed buildings, therefore removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 6 0 infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of Albrighton development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; viable and achievable. obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable Where necessary, this will be informed by further discussions The site is within a settlement boundary and so suitable for development in principle. Any proposed scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing with landowners; their representatives; and any further Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is development design and layout should complement the adjacent employment allocation. The site landowner and developer. necessary viability assessment work. Suitability of the site for owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is lies within 300m of a Conservation Area and several Listed Buildings. Development is subject to an Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a residential development is subject to appropriate management Field adj. Blunden Hall, assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets Where this shows available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number problems which could limit development. Therefore BIS016 Brampton Road, diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire (informed by input from relevant service areas and 0 15 0 of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests Bishop's Castle residential development is generally considered viable, unless infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for that there is confidence in the site being available and will there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Effort should be made to come forward for development. retain mature trees and hedgerows on the site. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered likely to become available in the future; to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure viable; and achievable. Where necessary, this will be informed currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable by further discussions with landowners; their representatives; can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing and any further necessary viability assessment work. The site is Site is suitable for residential development subject to satisfactory access. The site is within 300m of lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. also considered suitable for residential development subject to a Scheduled Monument, a Conservation Area and several Listed Buildings, therefore development is confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Rear of surgery, subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets Where appropriate management of the physical, heritage and to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet environmental constraints present (informed by input from BIS020 Schoolhouse Lane, removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 13 0 a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where Bishop's Castle willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. sensitivity assessment. beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable, available, viable and achievable The site is within the development boundary so development is acceptable in policy terms. obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). Suitability Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage or environmental scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing of the site for open market residential development is subject to constraints present. For instance the site is in proximity to the River Redlake Wildlife Site, therefore Shropshire Council Officers have investigated the availability landowner and developer. appropriate management of the physical, heritage and development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this of this site, but it remains unclear as to whether the site is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider environmental constraints present (informed by input from Field opposite the available for this form of development. Therefore desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. The site is also within relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where BKL001 information gathered for the purpose of this study is unable diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 44 0 Junior School, Bucknell 300m of a Scheduled Monument, a Conservation Area and one or more Listed Buildings, therefore appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape to confirm that the site is available for this form of residential development is generally considered viable, unless development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these sensitivity assessment. development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F1 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is available, achievable and viable. Whilst the site is located within the development boundary, there are a number The site is within the development boundary so development is acceptable in principle subject to of constraints that apply. This includes the fact that part of the material considerations. However, part of the site is within the River Redlake Wildlife Site, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the site is within the River Redlake Wildlife Site, consequently consequently development of this element of the site and an appropriate buffer is likely to lead to a developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by development of this element of the site and an appropriate significant adverse effect on one or more locally designated site(s) and as such is contrary to policy, the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure therefore this part of the site is unsuitable for development. Additionally, part of the site is also buffer is likely to lead to a significant adverse effect on one or obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable within Flood Zones 2 and/or 3, therefore this element of the site would only be considered more locally designated site(s) and as such is contrary to policy, The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception test); the risk can therefore this part of the site is unsuitable for development. process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. The suitability of the remainder of the site is Additionally, part of the site is also within Flood Zones 2 and/or owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints 3, therefore this element of the site would only be considered present. For instance part of the site is within and the remainder is in proximity of a Conservation available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential BKL002 The Old Farm, Bucknell Area. The site is also within proximity of a Scheduled Monument and one or more listed buildings, ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 60 0 and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless increase risk elsewhere. Suitability of the site for open market that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial residential development is therefore subject to appropriate available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s management of the physical, heritage and environmental considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the constraints present (informed by input from relevant service issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the conclusions reached. The element of the site that is not within a Local Wildlife Site is in proximity of areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability this site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need assessment will be undertaken. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Clungunford within the Abcot, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Clungunford within the Abcot, Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community Cluster. Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited to small scale infilling/conversion or larger developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community development sites close to key community services on suitable sites within or adjoining the the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Cluster. Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited settlements. Part of the site now benefits from Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable to small scale infilling/conversion or larger development sites be considered suitable for open market residential development consisting of small scale infilling, scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing close to key community services on suitable sites within or Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any landowner and developer. adjoining the settlements. Part of the site now benefits from owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance a Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may be small portion of the site is located within a conservation area and the remainder of the site is in available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Land west of Broome desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a considered suitable for open market residential development proximity of this conservation area. The site is also in proximity of a scheduled monment and one or problems which could limit development. Therefore CGD002 diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire consisting of small-scale infilling, subject to material 10 0 0 Road, Clungunford more listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests residential development is generally considered viable, unless considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total that there is confidence in the site being available and will there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national come forward for development. policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally environmental constraints present. of development. The ability to provide an appropriate access is also subject to highway approval. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

The site is within the development boundary so development is acceptable in policy terms, subject to material considerations such as the ability to suitably manage any physical, heritage or environmental constraints present. For instance the site is in a Conservation Area, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of this/these designated heritage asset(s) is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is within then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. the development boundary so development is acceptable in obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and policy terms, subject to a heritage assessment of the impact of The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing the conclusions reached. The site is densely wooded, which will require due consideration. The site development on the Conservation Area will be required. If this relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. is also within 300m of a Scheduled Monument and one or more Listed Buildings, therefore shows no adverse effect, or that any such effect can be available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Land adjacent to The development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these adequately mitigated, the site's development potential would heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a also depend on suitable management of any other physical, CLU003 Hall, Vicarage Road, development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 2 0 0 heritage and environmental constraints present (informed by Clun likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless input from relevant service areas and infrastructure providers); considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. The site is in the Shropshire Hills AONB, therefore major development of this site is subject to an and the outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally assessment of impact on the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a assessment. These include the site's location in the Shropshire considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the public Hills AONB; the wooded character of the site; and its proximity to issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the interest of the development outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. However, as a Wildlife Site, Scheduled Monument and one or more Listed achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the site is also within a settlement development boundary it is considered suitable for development Buildings. in principle. The site is within 250m of a Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment will be undertaken. assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm.

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Clungunford within the Abcot, Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Clungunford within the Abcot, developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community Cluster. the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited to small scale infilling/conversion or larger Cluster. Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable development sites close to key community services on suitable sites within or adjoining the to small scale infilling/conversion or larger development sites The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing settlements. Part of the site now benefits from Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may close to key community services on suitable sites within or relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. be considered suitable for open market residential development, subject to material considerations adjoining the settlements. Part of the site now benefits from available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may be Site 1 Land adjacent the heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is in proximity of a Local and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a considered suitable for open market residential development, HPH001 Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 0 0 railway line subject to material considerations including the application of designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. harm. physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered assessment will be undertaken. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

F2 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Clungunford within the Abcot, Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Clungunford within the Abcot, Cluster. Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable Beckjay, Clungunford, Hopton Heath, Shelderton and Twitchen (Three Ashes) Community Cluster. to small scale infilling/conversion or larger development sites The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Within Clungunford appropriate development is limited to small scale infilling/conversion or larger close to key community services on suitable sites within or relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. development sites close to key community services on suitable sites within or adjoining the adjoining the settlements. Part of the site now benefits from available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a settlements. Part of the site now benefits from Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may Planning Permission, the remainder of the site may be Site 2 Land adjacent the be considered suitable for open market residential development, subject to material considerations and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a considered suitable for open market residential development, HPH002 including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 0 0 railway line subject to material considerations including the application of heritage and environmental constraints present. purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Furthermore, Clungunford has not been identified as a proposed considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered assessment will be undertaken. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered suitable (infilling/conversion); available; developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Agricultural buildings within an existing Community Cluster settlement, as such conversions/infilling assessment) for residential development. Suitability of the site The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable may be appropriate subject to material considerations and suitable management of any physical, for open market residential development (infilling/conversion) is relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing heritage or environmental constraints present. For instance comments will be needed from highway subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. department regarding highway access. The site is within 300m of several grade 2 listed buildings and environmental constraints present (informed by input from Land at Bank Farm, a grade 1 listed building, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where WBR008 significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 5 0 0 Worthen appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire sensitivity assessment. It is also proposed that Worthen will be a policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless of development. It is also proposed that Worthen will be a Community Hub, which may impact on Community Hub, which may impact on suitability for other uses. development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. suitability for other uses. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by considered suitable for development subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure assessment and management of any impact on the physical; The site is considered developable subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage and obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically environmental constraints. For instance the ability to provide access is subject to Highway Officer The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing access to the site and mitigation of the impact of development advice. The site contains and is within proximity of trees subject to TPO protection, therefore relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is not landowner and developer. on the trees subject to TPO protection both on the site and in development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to currently available but will become so in the future; that Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a proximity; and the Conservation and Listed Buildings within demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for there is a willing landowner/developer; and no legal or Land off Stourbridge development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a proximity. ownership problems which could limit development beyond BRD012 proximity of a Conservation and Listed Buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, 0 40 0 Road, Bridgnorth those which mean the site is not immediately available. of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that residential development is generally considered viable, unless the sites development potential would also depend on suitable Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. management of any other physical, heritage and environmental tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed study suggests that there is confidence in the site becoming Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally constraints present (informed by input from relevant service against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for available for development in the future. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services assessment will be undertaken. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

The site is within the development boundary so development is acceptable in policy terms, subject For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to material considerations and suitable management of any physical, heritage or environmental developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by constraints present. For instance these include the presence of a Listed Building within the site the the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure site's location in a Conservation Area, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing The site is considered available, achievable and viable (subject to this/these designated heritage asset(s) is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. any further necessary viability assessment). The site is within the Land north-west of against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development boundary so development is acceptable in policy necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site is also in the and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a terms, subject to material considerations and management of DNP005 South Road, Ditton Shropshire Hills AONB, therefore major development of this site is subject to an assessment of development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire any physical, heritage of environmental constraints present 20 20 0 Priors impact on the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a significant and purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless (informed by input from relevant service areas and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the public interest of the the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual impact and development outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. However, as the site is also development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally landscape sensitivity assessment. within a settlement development boundary it is considered suitable for development in principle. The site is within 250m of a Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of achievability and viability of development, a separate viability development outweigh the harm. assessment will be undertaken.

F3 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Morville is located within Morville is located within the Acton Round, Aston Eyre, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the the Acton Round, Aston Eyre, Monkhopton, Morville and Upton Cressett Community Cluster Monkhopton, Morville and Upton Cressett Community Cluster developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Community Cluster. Within Morville open market residential development is limited to infilling, Community Cluster. Within Morville open market residential the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure conversions and small groups of dwellings on suitable sites within or immediately adjoining the development is limited to infilling, conversions and small groups village. The housing guideline for the Community cluster is around 15 dwellings, current obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable of dwellings on suitable sites within or immediately adjoining the commitments and completions total around 28 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such a small The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing village. The housing guideline for the Community cluster is group of open market dwellings on the site may be acceptable, subject to material considerations relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. around 15 dwellings, current commitments and completions including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is located in proximity of a total around 28 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such a and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a conservation area and one or more listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an small group of open market dwellings on the site may be MVE002 site 2 development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 0 0 assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows acceptable, subject to material considerations including the purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints against the public benefits of development. The ability to provide an appropriate access is also development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally present. subject to highway approval. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore, Marton has not been identified as a proposed however, Morville has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within assessment will be undertaken. Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

Within development boundary so site suitable for development. Discussion will be needed with highway authority about vehicle access and Coal Authority regarding land conditions. The site is within 500m of an Ancient Woodland site. Development is subject to an assessment of impact on this natural asset. Where deterioration or loss is likely, national policy states that the need for, and The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for benefits of, the development should clearly outweigh the loss if development is to be acceptable. residential development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the acceptable safeguarding. The site is within 250m of 3 Local Wildlife Sites, so development is subject to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a considered suitable for development subject to appropriate significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure assessment and management of any impact on the physical; economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. However, the site is considered suitable for The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is within 30m of relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing potential impacts on environmental and heritage assets. a Veteran Tree/ tree protected by a Tree Preservation Order so development is subject to an available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, Adj. Brook Cottage, 4 and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, the sites development potential would also depend on suitable BRO034 development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 6 0 0 Bridge Rd, Broseley subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is located within a Conservation Area, therefore management of any other physical, heritage and environmental purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that constraints present (informed by input from relevant service the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of conclusions reached. The site is within proximity of a World Heritage Site and a number of listed issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the buildings so development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial assessment will be undertaken. harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding.

The site is within the development boundary of the settlement so residential development is acceptable in principle subject to material considerations. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is within a Conservation Area, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site The site is considered likely to become available; achievable; and Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by is located within the Shropshire Hills AONB. Major development of this site is subject to an viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure assessment of impact on the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the public currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of interest of the development outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. However, as can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing the site. The sites suitability for development is subject to the site is also within a settlement development boundary it is considered suitable for development lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. appropriate assessment and management of any impact on the in principle. The site is also within proximity of a SSSI, therefore development is subject to an confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Church Stretton Car assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact physical; environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the special Specifically its location within the AONB and a Conservation CST001 Sales, Burway Road, removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 features and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs. However, the site is considered Area. If no significant adverse impacts on this asset was Church Stretton willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Furthermore identified or if suitable mitigation is possible, the site's legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. the site is within proximity of ancient woodland, therefore development is subject to an assessment development potential would also depend on suitable of impact on this natural asset. Where deterioration or loss is likely, national policy states that the beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally management of any other physical, heritage and environmental need for, and benefits of, the development should clearly outweigh the loss if development is to be available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific constraints present (informed by input from relevant service acceptable. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within development is subject to an assessment becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. assessment will be undertaken. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within proximity of listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding.

F4 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

Site is within the development boundary of Church Stretton so is suitable subject to material considerations. The site is within a Conservation Area, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site is located within For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered likely to become available; achievable; and the Shropshire Hills AONB. Major development of this site is subject to an assessment of impact on Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the public interest of the development Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. However, as the site is also within a and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing settlement development boundary it is considered suitable for development in principle. The site is the site. The site is also considered suitable for development lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. also within proximity of a SSSI, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the subject to appropriate assessment and management of any confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need impact on the physical; environmental; or heritage constraints to Crown Carpets, Burway to consider whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a the site. Specifically its location within a Conservation Area and CST002 impacts on the national network of SSSIs. However, the site is considered suitable for development removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 Road, Church Stretton the AONB. If no significant adverse impacts on this assets was in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Furthermore the site is within willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless identified or if suitable mitigation is possible, the site's proximity of ancient woodland, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. natural asset. Where deterioration or loss is likely, national policy states that the need for, and development potential would also depend on suitable beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally benefits of, the development should clearly outweigh the loss if development is to be acceptable. management of any other physical, heritage and environmental available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to constraints present (informed by input from relevant service of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within development is subject to an assessment of impact areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. However, becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable assessment will be undertaken. safeguarding. The site is also within proximity of listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding.

The site is within the Church Stretton development boundary so the principle of development is accepted. The site is located within the Shropshire Hills AONB. Major development of this site is For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the subject to an assessment of impact on the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure public interest of the development outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable However, as the site is also within a settlement development boundary it is considered suitable for obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for development in principle. The site is within 500m of an Ancient Woodland site. Development is The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential subject to an assessment of impact on this natural asset. Where deterioration or loss is likely, process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. development is subject to appropriate management of the national policy states that the need for, and benefits of, the development should clearly outweigh owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a the loss if development is to be acceptable. However, the site is considered suitable for physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Land at Woodbank available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is within 250m (informed by input from relevant service areas and CST008 ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 6 0 0 House, Church Stretton of a Wildlife Site. Development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of acceptable safeguarding. The site is adjacent to a Conservation Area. Development is subject to an considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number achievability and viability of development, a separate viability of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed assessment will be undertaken. against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding.

The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations process for a relevant use, but the site is currently occupied For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the (the user has not confirmed that they can/will vacate the site developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to allow its development, but their lease will expire at a The site is considered suitable; available (following the relocation the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure specified point in the future or there is confidence that they of the existing abattoir); achievable; and viable (subject to any obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable A small part of the site are within Flood Zones 2 and/or 3. The area of the site outside this zone has will vacate the site) and/or it is subject to some other form of further necessary viability assessment) for residential scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing potential for residential development (following the relocation of the existing abattoir) as it is constraint (time limited or can be removed). It is however development. Suitability of the site for residential development landowner and developer. located within the Craven Arms settlement boundary. This potential is subject to the appropriate understood that it is owned by a willing landowner and/or is subject to appropriate assessment and management of the Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site developer; and that there are no legal or ownership impact on physical, heritage and environmental constraints Abattoir site, Craven is within 300m of a Conservation Area and several Listed Buildings, therefore development is subject desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a problems which could limit development, beyond those present (informed by input from relevant service areas and CRA001 to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets Where this diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 26 0 Arms which mean the site is not immediately available. Therefore infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a residential development is generally considered viable, unless information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Such number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for that there is confidence in the site becoming available for constraints include: Flood Zones 2 and/or 3; proximity to a Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. development in the future. Specifically there is a stated Conservation Area and to several Listed Buildings. Furthermore considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific aspiration within the current Development Plan to relocate the associated settlement offers a range of services and facilities issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the abattoir to the proposed Newington Food Park. This suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability relocation will allow the redevelopment of the existing site, assessment will be undertaken. which will act as a catalyst for the redevelopment of the wider area.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is a brownfield site within the development boundary. Suitable in principle for residential obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for development. A positively designed scheme could enhance the site and its setting, which is a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is residential development. Suitability of the site for residential gateway into the town. Therefore the site is suitable subject to appropriate management of any landowner and developer. owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is development is subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is brownfield and in Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a use as a garage, therefore there are potential contamination issues. The site is also in proximity of a available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Garage Corvedale Rd, desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a conservation area and listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact problems which could limit development. Therefore (informed by input from relevant service areas and CRA029 diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 0 8 Craven Arms on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of residential development is generally considered viable, unless a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national that there is confidence in the site being available and will a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits come forward for development. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of subject to acceptable safeguarding. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F5 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is located within the Highley development boundary. As such the principle of residential obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been the subject of either a refused or (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for development on the site is established. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of the scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing physical, heritage and environmental constraints. For instance part of the site was subject to withdrawn Planning Application for a relevant use, but it is residential development. Suitability of the site for residential landowner and developer. previous quarrying and subsequent landfill uses, this will require due consideration. The site is understood that there remains development interest; the development is subject to appropriate management of the Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a adjacent to existing commercial units. The relationship between these units and any residential site is owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is physical, heritage and environmental constraints present desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development on this site will require due consideration. The site contains and is in proximity of trees available to develop now; and there are no legal or (informed by input from relevant service areas and subject to TPO protection, development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire Off Netherton Lane, ownership problems which could limit development. infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. The site is also in residential development is generally considered viable, unless HNN021 Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. 0 10 0 Highley proximity of a conservation area and a number of listed buildings, therefore development is subject there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. study suggests that there is confidence in the site being Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally available and will come forward for development. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be Approximately 40% of the site granted Planning Permission the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the weighed against the public benefits of development. (17/05813/FUL) for a business unit. As such site capacity has Approximately 40% of the site granted Planning Permission achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Approximately 40% of the site granted Planning Permission (17/05813/FUL) for a business unit. As been reduced. (17/05813/FUL) for a business unit. As such site capacity has assessment will be undertaken. such site capacity has been reduced. been reduced. Approximately 40% of the site granted Planning Permission (17/05813/FUL) for a business unit. As such site capacity has been reduced.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is located within the development boundary. As such open market residential development the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject is suitable in principle. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage or obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also environmental constraints present. For instance surrounding uses are primarily employment based, scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing considered suitable for open market residential development the relationship between any development on this site (and resultant sensitive users) and Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is landowner and developer. subject to appropriate assessment and management of any surrounding uses will require due consideration. The site is within 500m of a SSSI, therefore owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a physical; environmental; or heritage constraints to the site development is subject to an assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Field adjacent to the SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a (informed by input from relevant service areas and problems which could limit development. Therefore BUR001 outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader impacts on the national network of diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual impact and 0 36 0 Aspire Centre, Burford information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests SSSIs. The site is also within 300m of a number of G2 listed buildings and Castle Tump, a scheduled residential development is generally considered viable, unless landscape sensitivity assessment. Specifically the sites setting is that there is confidence in the site being available and will monument, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. primarily employment based. setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of development. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; likely to become available; currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability The site is located within the Ludlow development boundary and is considered to represent a can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing assessment) for residential development. Suitability of the site suitable location for residential development, subject to appropriate management of any physical, lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. for residential development is subject to appropriate heritage and environmental constraints. For instance, the site is located within proximity of one or confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a more listed buildings and a conservation area, therefore development is subject to an assessment of management of the physical, heritage and environmental to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets Where this shows that substantial constraints present (informed by input from relevant service LUD005 21 New Street, Ludlow removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 0 0 harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered viable and achievable (subject to any The site is within the Ludlow development boundary so the principle of development is accepted Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by further necessary viability assessment). Its availability is subject to management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints. These include to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure unknown. Where necessary, this will be informed by further consideration of any loss of employment. The site is in proximity of a Scheduled Monument, currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable discussions with landowners and/or their representatives. Conservation Area and one or more Listed Buildings, therefore development is subject to an can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Furthermore, the associated settlement offers a range of assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. services and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a occupiers of the site. The site is currently suitable for of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed Morris Bufton to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development as it is located within the development boundary against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for LUD022 removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire where the principle of development is accepted subject to 0 41 0 Galdeford, Ludlow development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within 500m of a SSSI, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the notified special willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of any physical, heritage and environmental interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to consider legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. constraints. These include the implications of any loss of whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader impacts on beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally employment; and the site's proximity to a SSSI, a Scheduled the national network of SSSIs. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Monument, a Conservation Area and several Listed Buildings. to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. If the consent for a retail unit on part of the site is of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Additionally, If the consent for a retail unit on part of the site is implemented, this will need to be excluded from the developable area. becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability implemented, this will need to be excluded from the developable assessment will be undertaken. area.

F6 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Hub, however within Onibury open market residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the village. The housing guideline for Onibury is around 25 dwellings. The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable As a former quarry, the sites topography may be challenging, contamination may be present and (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the ground investigations are likely to be required. market residential development. Suitability of the site for open developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is also located within the AONB, therefore any major development of this site is subject to market residential development is subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure an assessment of impact on the special qualities of this AONB. Where this assessment shows a management of the physical, heritage and environmental significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the public obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable constraints present (informed by input from relevant service interest of the development outweighs the harm, in line with paragraph 116 of NPPF. This site’s The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. conclusions reached. owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a The site is also in proximity of a conservation area and one or more listed buildings, therefore Particularly the fact the site is located within the AONB, site available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these topography/stability, appropriate development ONY005 Land at the Quarry ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 3 0 0 heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then size/design/layout and consideration of the settlement guideline. Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is However, Onibury has not been identified as a proposed study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the The ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway approval. available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within Subject to these factors, a suitably sized scheme, appropriate consideration of the identified housing considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered guideline for the settlement, and any other material considerations, including any other physical, issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as heritage and environmental constraints present, the site may currently be suitable for development. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability However, Onibury has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or part of the Local Plan Review. As such under this policy approach assessment will be undertaken. Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the open market residential development on the site would be SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community contrary to policy in the future. Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. As such under this policy approach open market residential development on the site would be contrary to policy.

The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Hub, however within Onibury open market (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites market residential development. Suitability of the site for open developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by within the village. The housing guideline for Onibury is around 25 dwellings. market residential development is subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is also partly within and partly in proximity of a conservation area and in proximity of one or management of the physical, heritage and environmental more listed buildings, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable constraints present (informed by input from relevant service Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being Particularly the fact the site is located within a conservation area, Land south east of available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a undertaken and the conclusions reached. appropriate development size/design/layout and consideration ONY006 ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 0 0 Church Close The ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway approval. of the settlement guideline. Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless Subject to these factors, a suitably sized scheme, appropriate consideration of the identified housing However, Onibury has not been identified as a proposed study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. guideline for the settlement, and any other material considerations, including any other physical, Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the heritage and environmental constraints present, the site may currently be suitable for development. available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within However, Onibury has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. As such under this policy approach open market part of the Local Plan Review. As such under this policy approach assessment will be undertaken. residential development on the site would be contrary to policy. open market residential development on the site would be contrary to policy in the future.

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Bletchley is located within the For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Bletchley is located within the Bletchley, Longford, Longslow and Bletchley, Longford, Longslow and Moreton Say Community Cluster. Within Bletchley open market developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Moreton Say Community Cluster. Within Bletchley open market residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses within the village. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 20 additional dwellings during the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable and conversions on suitable sites within the village. The guideline plan period, current commitments and completions total around 33 dwellings (as at 31st March scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing across the Community Cluster is 20 additional dwellings during 2017). As such conversion of the existing buildings on the site to open market dwellings may be Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is landowner and developer. the plan period, current commitments and completions total acceptable, subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a around 33 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such conversion and any suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Land north of A41, instance the site is in proximity of one or more listed buildings, therefore development is subject to desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a of the existing buildings on the site to open market dwellings problems which could limit development. Therefore BLE002 an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire may be acceptable, subject to material considerations including 5 0 0 Bletchley information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a residential development is generally considered viable, unless the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable that there is confidence in the site being available and will number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints weighed against the public benefits of development. The ability to provide an appropriate access is come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally present. also subject to highway approval. However, Bletchley has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific However, Bletchley has not been identified as a proposed Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered available, viable and achievable (subject to obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site is within the development boundary so the principle of development is accepted subject to any further necessary viability assessment). Furthermore, the scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing material considerations and suitable management of any physical, heritage or environmental Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is associated settlement offers a range of services and facilities landowner and developer. constraints present. For instance, the site is located within a Conservation Area and its proximity to a owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site. The Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Land adjacent to Scheduled Monument, a Registered Park or Garden and one or more Listed Buildings, therefore available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership site is also suitable in principle for open market residential development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a problems which could limit development. Therefore development as it is within the development boundary, subject HHH001 County Primary School, substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 0 0 information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests to material considerations; suitable management of any other Hodnet development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial residential development is generally considered viable, unless that there is confidence in the site being available and will physical, heritage and environmental constraints present harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the come forward for development. (informed by input from relevant service areas and Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally conclusions reached. infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual impact and considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific landscape sensitivity assessment. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F7 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site is within the development boundary so the principle of development is accepted subject to to any further necessary viability assessment). furthermore, the The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing material considerations and suitable management of any physical, heritage or environmental associated settlement offers a range of services and facilities relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. constraints present. For instance, the site is located within a Conservation Area and its proximity to a suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site. The available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Divisional Surveyors Scheduled Monument, a Registered Park or Garden and one or more Listed Buildings, therefore site is also suitable in principle for open market residential development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development as it is within the development boundary, subject HHH003 Office & Depot, Hearne substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 9 0 0 to material considerations; suitable management of any other Lane, Hodnet development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless physical, heritage and environmental constraints present harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the (informed by input from relevant service areas and development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally conclusions reached. infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual impact and considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific landscape sensitivity assessment. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; will likely become available; currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing This site is a suitable location for residential development subject to appropriate management of assessment) for residential development. Suitability of the site lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is within for residential development is subject to appropriate confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a proximity of one or more listed buildings and a conservation area, as such development is subject to management of the physical, heritage and environmental 77 - 83 Shropshire an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets Where this shows to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a constraints present (informed by input from relevant service MDR001 that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 0 0 Street, Market Drayton areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site has been the subject of either a withdrawn Planning developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Application for a relevant use, but the site is currently the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable for residential development. Suitability is subject to appropriate The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable occupied (the user has not confirmed that they can/will obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance there is (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for vacate the site to allow its development, but their lease will scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing a TPO adjacent to the site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the residential development. Suitability of the site for residential expire at a specified point in the future or there is confidence landowner and developer. protected tree(s) on/in proximity of the site in order to demonstrate how they can be safeguarded. development is subject to appropriate management of the that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject to some Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Car Sales Area, Thus, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to these physical, heritage and environmental constraints present safeguarding measures being deemed acceptable. Additionally the site is located within proximity of other form of constraint (time limited or can be removed). It desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a (informed by input from relevant service areas and MDR002 Salisbury Road, Market one or more listed buildings, consequently development is subject to an assessment of impact on is however understood that it is owned by a willing diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of Drayton the significance of the setting of this heritage asset(s). Where this shows that substantial harm or a landowner and/or developer; and that there are no legal or residential development is generally considered viable, unless a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national ownership problems which could limit development, beyond there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services those which mean the site is not immediately available. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally of development. Thus, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific subject to acceptable safeguarding. the site. study suggests that there is confidence in the site becoming issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site is considered suitable, likely to become available, can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. assessment) and appropriate management of the physical, The site is considered suitable for open market residential development. Suitability is also subject to confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a heritage and environmental constraints present (informed by Haulage Yard, appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a input from relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) instance the site is within 300m of a Conservation Area, accordingly the impact of any proposed MDR003 Newcastle Road, removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire and where appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and 0 7 0 development will need to be appropriately assessed and considered. Notwithstanding this there are Market Drayton few other constraints and the site is considered suitable for development. willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless landscape sensitivity assessment. legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F8 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered suitable, available, achievable; and viable the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) and The site falls within the development boundary of Market Drayton. As such it is a suitable location obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable appropriate management of the physical, heritage and for residential development. Although the site is included within the cricket club open space, the The site was subject to a series of applications for residential scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing environmental constraints present (informed by input from site itself does not include any green space (it is a brownfield site) although it does include the club development in 2006 and 2008. Shropshire Council Officers landowner and developer. relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where house, any development would therefore need to demonstrate that this facility is no longer have confidence that the site is owned by a willing Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape required or include a replacement facility. Any development on the site would need to address any landowner and/or developer; it is available to develop now; Cricket Club, Betton physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance, the site is within 300m of a desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a sensitivity assessment. Suitability is subject to the development there are no legal or ownership problems which could limit MDR004 Conservation Area and a number of listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire including a replacement club house facility or demonstrating that 0 5 0 Road, Market Drayton development. Therefore information gathered for the assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows residential development is generally considered viable, unless this facility is no longer required as although the site is included purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. within the cricket club open space, the site itself does not include of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed the site being available and will come forward for Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally any green space (it is a brownfield site) only the club house. against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the site. assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been the subject of either a refused or (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing withdrawn Planning Application for a relevant use, but it is residential development. Suitability of the site for residential landowner and developer. understood that there remains development interest; the development is subject to appropriate management of the Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Pet Market, site is owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is physical, heritage and environmental constraints present The site is considered suitable for residential development. Suitability is subject to appropriate desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a available to develop now; and there are no legal or (informed by input from relevant service areas and MDR026 Shrewsbury Road, management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 ownership problems which could limit development. infrastructure providers); and where appropriate the outcome of Market Drayton residential development is generally considered viable, unless Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. study suggests that there is confidence in the site being Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally available and will come forward for development. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is located within the Market Drayton development boundary. However, the north western For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the corner of the site is a protected employment site. As such residential development is suitable in principle apart from the element of the site which is protected for employment (suitability of which developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by would be dependent on appropriate policy changes). Suitability on the site is subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also ability to provide an appropriate access into the site is subject to highway approval. The site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing considered suitable (apart from the element of the site which is Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is adjacent (and partly contains) the Tern Park Business Park a protected employment site, landowner and developer. protected for employment, for which suitability is also owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is consideration of residential amenity is therefore necessary. The site is within proximity of a number Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a dependent on appropriate policy changes) subject to of veteran trees, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Longford Turning, desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a appropriate management of the physical, heritage and protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. The site is also within problems which could limit development. Therefore MDR031 diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire environmental constraints present (informed by input from 0 0 50 Market Drayton proximity of a wildlife site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests residential development is generally considered viable, unless relevant service areas and infrastructure providers); and where locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, that there is confidence in the site being available and will there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh come forward for development. the harm. The site is also within proximity of a listed building, therefore development is subject to Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally sensitivity assessment. Key constraints include proximity to and an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific presence of mature trees / trees subject to TPO protection; shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the highway access; and site/surrounding amenity. number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be achievability and viability of development, a separate viability weighed against the public benefits of development. Approximately half of the site is densely assessment will be undertaken. wooded and this will require due consideration.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the This brownfield site is considered suitable; available; achievable; developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by and viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure for open market residential development. Specifically the site is obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable located within proximity of an existing Community Hub, within This brownfield site is located within proximity of an existing Community Hub, within Stoke Heath The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Stoke Heath open market development will be delivered upon open market development will be delivered upon the allocated site together with limited infilling, relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. the allocated site together with limited infilling, groups of houses groups of houses and conversions on suitable sits within Stoke Heath. This particular site has also available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a and conversions on suitable sits within Stoke Heath. This been identified within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan as an appropriate location for residential Land at Rosehill Road and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a particular site has also been identified within the emerging development. SKH001 development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire Neighbourhood Plan as an appropriate location for residential 15 0 0 Stoke Heath Suitability of the site for open market residential development is subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present (informed by input purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless development. from relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of a the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Suitability of the site for open market residential development is visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Particularly contamination. development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific environmental constraints present (informed by input from issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where achievability and viability of development, a separate viability appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape assessment will be undertaken. sensitivity assessment. Particularly contamination.

F9 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable market residential development. Specifically the site is located The site is located within proximity of an existing Community Hub, within Stoke Heath open market The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing within proximity of an existing Community Hub, within Stoke development will be delivered upon the allocated site together with limited infilling, groups of process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. Heath open market development will be delivered upon the houses and conversions on suitable sits within Stoke Heath. This particular site has also been owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a identified within the emerging Neighbourhood Plan as an appropriate location for residential allocated site together with limited infilling, groups of houses available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development. and conversions on suitable sits within Stoke Heath. SKH002 Land at the 'Old Camp' ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 10 0 Suitability of the site for open market residential development is subject to appropriate Suitability of the site for open market residential development is Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present (informed by input subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. from relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of a environmental constraints present (informed by input from visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the sensitivity assessment. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Site is within the development boundary for Minsterley but a small section of the site is classified as the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure protected employment land and the site adjoins a large area in existing employment use. As such Part of the site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and The site has had the benefit of Planning Permission for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable open market residential development on the small element of the site that is protected employment viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for relevant use (residential as part of a mixed use), is subject to scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing is contrary to policy, but residential development on the remainder of the site is suitable in principle, open market residential development. Suitability of the site for a current outstanding renewal application. The site has also landowner and developer. subject to material considerations, including the suitable management of any physical, heritage and residential development is subject to appropriate management been promoted as part of 2017 call for sites. On this basis it Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Land at The Coach environmental constraint present. For instance the site is subject to contamination issues which of the physical and environmental constraints present (informed require addressing. The site adjoins an existing large food processing operation (Muller) the is understood that it is owned by a willing landowner and/or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a by input from relevant service areas and infrastructure MIN004 Depot and The White potential impacts of which were recognised at appeal with a requirement for an acoustic fence to developer; it is available to develop now; and there are no diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 0 0 providers) and where appropriate the outcome of a visual House, Minsterley protect the amenities of the occupants of proposed dwellings, this relationship and the need to legal or ownership problems which could limit development. residential development is generally considered viable, unless impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. mitigate any impact remain key considerations. The site is also within proximity of a SSSI, therefore Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development is subject to an assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services study suggests that there is confidence in the site being Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available and will come forward for development. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader impacts on the national network of the site. SSSIs. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

Previously submitted for consideration within the SHLAA; For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Complies with current policy and is also a brownfield site. Within 500m of a SSSI so development is SAMDev Plan; and the Much Wenlock Neighbourhood Plan. developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure subject to an assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an The site is considered suitable; likely to become available; adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits outweigh both the to become available for the relevant use, but the site is obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability harm to the special features and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs. However, currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing assessment) for residential development. Suitability of the site the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their landowner and developer. for residential development is subject to appropriate assessment safeguarding. The site boundary is also within 30m of a Tree Preservation Order. Development is lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a subject to an assessment of impact on this protected tree in order to demonstrate how it can be and management of impact on heritage and environmental Smithfield Works, Much confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, constraints in proximity (informed by input from relevant service MUW001 to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 17 0 Wenlock subject to acceptable safeguarding. Site is also within 300m of a Conservation Area and several areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a residential development is generally considered viable, unless Listed Buildings. Development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less legal or ownership problems which could limit development, Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of beyond those which mean the site is not immediately considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the subject to acceptable safeguarding. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site achievability and viability of development, a separate viability becoming available for development in the future. assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is located within the development boundary for Knockin. As such development by infilling the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure and conversions of buildings may be acceptable subject to material considerations. Knockin also (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable represents a proposed Community Hub. Material considerations include suitable consideration and market residential development. Suitability of the site for open The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints. For instance the ability of the market residential development is by infilling and conversions of process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. current access to serve the redevelopment of the site is subject to highway approval. The site is buildings, subject to material considerations; appropriate owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a within a conservation area and in proximity of a number of listed buildings and a scheduled management of the physical, heritage and environmental The Old Post Office, monument, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a constraints present (informed by input from relevant service KCK001 this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 6 0 0 Knockin areas and infrastructure providers); and where appropriate the likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and For instance the site is located within a conservation area. available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally the conclusions reached. The site is also in proximity of trees subject to TPO protection, therefore Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F10 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered suitable; achievable; and viable (subject to Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by any further necessary viability assessment) for residential to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure development. The site is considered to be not currently available, Suitable location subject to appropriate design and necessary assessments. Specifically the site is currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable but is likely to become so. Where necessary, this will be informed located within proximity of a scheduled monument, conservation area and one or more listed can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing by further discussions with landowners and/or their buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. representatives. setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Health Centre/ Adult significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less Suitability of the site for residential development is subject to to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of appropriate management of the physical, heritage and OSW002 Training Centre, removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 22 0 development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, environmental constraints present (informed by input from Victoria Rd, Oswestry willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is within proximity of a number of TPO’s, therefore relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. development is subject to an assessment of impact on these protected trees in order to appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape demonstrate how they can be safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally sensitivity assessment. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the site. assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. Suitable location subject to appropriate design. The site is within proximity of one or more listed development is subject to appropriate management of the owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of (informed by input from relevant service areas and Oakfield Middleton Rd, significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of OSW003 than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless 3 0 0 Oswestry a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services subject to acceptable safeguarding. available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Planning Permission (18/05057/FUL) granted for 3 dwellings after 31st March 2019. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of Planning Permission (18/05057/FUL) granted for 3 dwellings considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. after 31st March 2019. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Planning Permission (18/05057/FUL) granted for 3 dwellings achievability and viability of development, a separate viability after 31st March 2019. assessment will be undertaken. Planning Permission (18/05057/FUL) granted for 3 dwellings after 31st March 2019.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site has previously been submitted for inclusion within developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject the SHLAA. Shropshire Council Officers understand that the The site is in a suitable location for residential development, subject to appropriate assessment and the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also management of physical, heritage and environmental factors. Specifically, the site is located within a site is likely to become available for the relevant use, but the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable considered suitable for development subject to appropriate conservation area, therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. site is currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing assessment and management of any impact on the physical; Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage they can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but landowner and developer. environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If their lease will expire at a specified point in the future or Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of there is confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is Roy Evans Garage, Oak development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a the sites development potential would also depend on suitable subject to some other form of constraint (time limited or can OSW005 undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site is also in proximity of a scheduled monument; diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire management of any other physical, heritage and environmental 0 5 0 Street be removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a one or more listed buildings; and a registered park/garden, therefore development is subject to an residential development is generally considered viable, unless constraints present (informed by input from relevant service willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number legal or ownership problems which could limit development, Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed beyond those which mean the site is not immediately considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the site. becoming available for development in the future. assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. The site is a windfall redevelopment site within the urban boundary that is considered suitable for development is subject to appropriate management of the confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a residential development, subject to management of any physical, heritage and environmental physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Garages site, constraints. Specifically the site contains two TPO's and is in proximity of a number of other TPO's, to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a (informed by input from relevant service areas and OSW006 therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 7 0 Whittington Road infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F11 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been the subject of either a refused or (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing withdrawn Planning Application for a relevant use, but it is residential development. Suitability of the site for residential The site is located within a residential area of Oswestry. It is located within the development landowner and developer. understood that there remains development interest; the development is subject to appropriate management of the boundary and therefore its redevelopment would be consistent with policy - subject to the specific Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a site is owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is physical, heritage and environmental constraints present scheme. The site is within proximity of a listed building, therefore development is subject to an desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows available to develop now; and there are no legal or (informed by input from relevant service areas and Llys Hill, Middleton diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number ownership problems which could limit development. infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of OSW021 residential development is generally considered viable, unless 1 0 0 Road, Oswestry of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for study suggests that there is confidence in the site being Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. available and will come forward for development. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of Planning Permission (18/05573/FUL) granted after 31st March 2019. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Planning Permission (18/05573/FUL) granted after 31st the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the March 2019. Planning Permission (18/05573/FUL) granted after 31st March achievability and viability of development, a separate viability 2019. assessment will be undertaken. Planning Permission (18/05573/FUL) granted after 31st March 2019.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site has been the subject of either a refused or developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by withdrawn Planning Application for a relevant use, but the the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable site is currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for The site is located on the edge of the town centre within the Oswestry development boundary. The they can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential surrounding area contains a mix of uses including many residential properties. As such it is an their lease will expire at a specified point in the future or landowner and developer. development is subject to appropriate management of the appropriate location for residential development. The site is within proximity of one or more listed there is confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a buildings; a conservation area; a scheduled monument; and a registered park and garden. physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Welsh Border Meats, subject to some other form of constraint (time limited or can desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a Development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these (informed by input from relevant service areas and OSW043 be removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 Willow Street heritage assets Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the This brownfield site is suitable for development, subject to assessment and management of The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject The site has been the subject of a series of lapsed Planning developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by identified constraints. Specifically the site is located within a conservation area. Therefore to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also Permissions for a relevant use, but the site is currently the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure development of this site is subject to an assessment of impact on the specified asset(s). Where this considered suitable for development subject to appropriate shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset(s) is occupied (the user has not confirmed that they can/will obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable assessment and management of any impact on the physical; likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. vacate the site to allow its development, but their lease will scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically the If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of expire at a specified point in the future or there is confidence landowner and developer. sites location within a conservation area. development. The site is in proximity of one or more listed buildings and a scheduled monument. that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject to some Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Development is therefore subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, Autocare, King Street, other form of constraint (time limited or can be removed). It desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a this heritage asset(s). Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely the sites development potential would also depend on suitable OSW045 is however understood that it is owned by a willing diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 Oswestry then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial management of any other physical, heritage and environmental landowner and/or developer; and that there are no legal or residential development is generally considered viable, unless harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. Thus, the site constraints present (informed by input from relevant service ownership problems which could limit development, beyond there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual The site is in proximity of a wildlife site. Development is subject to an assessment of the impact on those which mean the site is not immediately available. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. this locally designated site.. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development study suggests that there is confidence in the site becoming issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of outweigh the harm. Thus, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability subject to acceptable safeguarding. the site. assessment will be undertaken.

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure residential development. Suitability of the site for residential The site is located within the Oswestry development boundary adjacent to sites allocated for The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable development is subject to appropriate management of the housing development. Therefore open market residential development on the site is likely to be relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing physical, heritage and environmental constraints present appropriate. However, the ability to provide an appropriate access into the site is subject to highway available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. approval. Furthermore, the site is within proximity of a listed building, therefore development is (informed by input from relevant service areas and and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of OSW051 Weston Lane, Oswestry development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 0 10 0 this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Specifically, purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be the ability to provide an appropriate access into the site is the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for subject to highway approval. development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F12 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Porth y waen is located The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is within the Llanyblodwel, Porthywaen, Dolgoch, Llynclys and Bryn Melyn Community Cluster. Within Porth y waen open market residential development is limited to allocated sites and infilling, groups located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the identified development boundaries. The Porth y waen is located within the Llanyblodwel, Porthywaen, guideline across the Community Cluster is 15 additional dwellings during the plan period, current For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Dolgoch, Llynclys and Bryn Melyn Community Cluster. Within commitments and completions total around 6 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Porth y waen open market residential development is limited to As such open market residential development on this site may be acceptable, subject to material the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure allocated sites and infilling, groups of houses and conversions on considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable suitable sites within the identified development boundaries. The of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing guideline across the Community Cluster is 15 additional appropriate access is subject to highway approval. The site is located within proximity of one or owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is landowner and developer. dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and more listed buildings therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a completions total around 6 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national problems which could limit development. Therefore desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a As such open market residential development on this site may be policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire acceptable, subject to material considerations including the PWN009 Land east of Kiln Side of development. The site is also located within proximity of a SSSI, therefore development is subject that there is confidence in the site being available and will residential development is generally considered viable, unless application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable 3 0 0 to an assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse come forward for development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints impact is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the Planning Permissions (19/00881/OUT and 19/01012/OUT) Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally present. special features and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs. The site is located within granted for 4 and 3 dwellings respectively, after 31st March considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific However, Porth y waen has not been identified as a proposed proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse 2019. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within outweigh the harm. assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered However, Porth y waen has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Planning Permissions (19/00881/OUT and 19/01012/OUT) granted appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the for 4 and 3 dwellings respectively, after 31st March 2019. part of the Local Plan Review. SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Planning Permissions (19/00881/OUT and 19/01012/OUT) Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. granted for 4 and 3 dwellings respectively, after 31st March Planning Permissions (19/00881/OUT and 19/01012/OUT) granted for 4 and 3 dwellings 2019. respectively, after 31st March 2019.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Brownfield site within development boundary so suitable in principle, subject to material the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure considerations. Material considerations include any physical, environmental or heritage constraints The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable present. For instance the site is within 500m of a SSSI, therefore development is subject to an The site has been the subject of a lapsed Planning (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact Application for a relevant use, but it is understood that there market residential development. Suitability of the site for open landowner and developer. is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the special remains development interest; the site is owned by a willing market residential development is subject to appropriate Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a features and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs. The site is within 250m of a landowner and/or developer; it is available to develop now; management of the physical, heritage and environmental Penylan, Penygarreg Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a and there are no legal or ownership problems which could constraints present (informed by input from relevant service PYC002 designated site.. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 5 0 Lane, Pant limit development. Therefore information gathered for the areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the residential development is generally considered viable, unless purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. harm. The site is within 300m of grade 2 listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows the site being available and will come forward for Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number development. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed the site. against the public benefits of development. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open Greenfield infill site within development boundary. As such suitable in principle, subject to material The site has been the subject of a lapsed Planning considerations. Suitability is also subject to suitable management of any physical, heritage and scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing market residential development. Suitability of the site for open Application for a relevant use, but it is understood that there environmental constraints present. For instance comments from highway department regarding landowner and developer. market residential development is subject to material remains development interest; the site is owned by a willing highway access. The site is also within 300m of several grade 2 listed buildings and scheduled Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a considerations and appropriate management of the physical, landowner and/or developer; it is available to develop now; monument, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a heritage and environmental constraints present (informed by Land to rear of setting of these heritage assets Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance and there are no legal or ownership problems which could diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire input from relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than limit development. Therefore information gathered for the RUY007 Riversdale, Church St, residential development is generally considered viable, unless and where appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and 5 0 0 substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in Ruyton XI Towns there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. landscape sensitivity assessment. The site contains trees subject to TPO protection, therefore development is subject to an the site being available and will come forward for Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be development. safeguarded. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of Planning Permission (19/00560/OUT) granted for 5 dwellings Planning Permission (19/00560/OUT) granted for 5 dwellings on the majority of the site, after 31st issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. on the majority of the site, after 31st March 2019. March 2019. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Planning Permission (19/00560/OUT) granted for 5 dwellings on assessment will be undertaken. the majority of the site, after 31st March 2019. Planning Permission (19/00560/OUT) granted for 5 dwellings on the majority of the site, after 31st March 2019.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for The site has been the subject of a lapsed Planning scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential Application for a relevant use, but it is understood that there Site is considered suitable for open market residential development. Suitability is subject to material landowner and developer. development is subject to material considerations and remains development interest; the site is owned by a willing considerations and suitable management of any physical, heritage or environmental considerations. Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a appropriate management of the physical, heritage and Former Dairy Site, For instance the site is within 300m of several grade 2 listed buildings, therefore development is landowner and/or developer; it is available to develop now; desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a environmental constraints present (informed by input from subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where and there are no legal or ownership problems which could RUY019 School Road, Ruyton XI diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire relevant service areas and infrastructure providers) and where 0 65 0 this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet limit development. Therefore information gathered for the Towns residential development is generally considered viable, unless appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. sensitivity assessment. weighed against the public benefits of development. the site being available and will come forward for Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F13 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been the subject of a lapsed Planning (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Application for a relevant use (granted 2011). It is however residential development. Suitability of the site for residential landowner and developer. understood that it is owned by a willing landowner and/or development is subject to appropriate management of the Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Brownfield site within development boundary. Therefore the site is considered suitable in principle developer; and that there are no legal or ownership physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Darjeeling, School Lane, for residential development. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a problems which could limit development, beyond those (informed by input from relevant service areas and SMH002 heritage or environmental constraints present. For instance comments will be required from diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 12 0 St Martins which mean the site is not immediately available. Therefore infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of highway department regarding highway access. residential development is generally considered viable, unless information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. that there is confidence in the site becoming available for Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally development in the future. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered likely to become available, viable and The site is located on the edge of the town centre of Shifnal, within its development boundary. As This site has previously been the subject of Planning achievable. Where necessary, this will be informed by further such it is a suitable location for open market residential development. However, this excludes a Applications (most recently refused in 2005) for the For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the discussions with landowners and/or their representatives; and small portion of the site, along its eastern boundary which is located within flood zones 2 and/or 3. demolition of existing buildings (beyond the identified site developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by any further necessary viability assessment work. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental area) and erection of 28 dwellings. Shropshire Council the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is however considered suitable for residential constraints present. For instance the site is located within a conservation area, therefore Officers understand that the site is likely to become available obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable development (excluding the small portion of the site located development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that for the relevant use, but the site is currently occupied (the scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing within flood zones 2 and/or 3), subject to assessment and substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of this/these designated heritage asset(s) is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than user has not confirmed that they can/will vacate the site to landowner and developer. management of the physical; environmental; or heritage Land to the rear of substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. allow its development, but their lease will expire at a Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a constraints. Such as the ability to access the site and its location This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and specified point in the future or there is confidence that they desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a within a conservation area. SHF004 Jaspers, Shrewsbury the conclusions reached. Additionally the site is adjacent to a TPO, therefore development is subject will vacate the site) and/or it is subject to some other form of diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, 0 5 0 Road to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can constraint (time limited or can be removed). It is however residential development is generally considered viable, unless the sites development potential would also depend on be safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, understood that it is owned by a willing landowner and/or there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. appropriate changes to policies affecting this location; suitable subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is also in proximity of a number of listed buildings, developer; and that there are no legal or ownership Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally management of any other physical, heritage and environmental therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely problems which could limit development, beyond those considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific constraints present (informed by input from relevant service then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial which mean the site is not immediately available. Therefore issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the areas and infrastructure providers); and the outcome of a visual harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests achievability and viability of development, a separate viability impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable that there is confidence in the site becoming available for assessment will be undertaken. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services safeguarding. The ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway approval. development in the future. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing The site is located within the development boundary and a predominantly residential area therefore relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is not residential development. Suitability of the site for residential landowner and developer. the principle of open market residential uses on the site is accepted. Suitability is subject to currently available but will become so in the future; that development is subject to appropriate management of the Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a St Peter's Youth Club, appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For there is a willing landowner/developer; and no legal or physical, heritage and environmental constraints present instance the site is in proximity of a conservation area and several listed buildings, therefore desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a ownership problems which could limit development beyond (informed by input from relevant service areas and SHF016 Bridgnorth Road, development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 12 0 those which mean the site is not immediately available. infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of Shifnal heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then residential development is generally considered viable, unless Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. study suggests that there is confidence in the site becoming Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally available for development in the future. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for West of Lamledge Lane The site is located within the Shifnal development boundary. The eastern portion of the site is unallocated. The western portion of the site is allocated for employment uses and the preference available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. residential development. Suitability of the site for residential and Shifnal College and and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development is subject to appropriate management of the SHF021 would be for employment uses upon it, however it is recognised that the wider employment 0 6 0 North of Shifnal allocation has been granted Planning Permission for a mixed residential and care home scheme, development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a physical, heritage and environmental constraints present therefore open market residential uses on this component of the site is also likely to be appropriate. purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire (informed by input from relevant service areas and Industrial Estate The ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway approval. the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

F14 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. The site is considered suitable, available; achievable; and viable For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is located within the Shifnal development boundary and its frontage is within the town (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by centre. As a result there would be an expectation that ground floor uses may be more appropriate market residential development. Suitability of the site for open for retail and town centre uses. Open market residential uses on upper floors would be supported. the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure market residential development above the ground floor is The site does have potential for open market residential on the ground floor subject to The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable subject to appropriate management of the physical, heritage and demonstration of compliance with current policy (that residential uses on the ground floor would relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing environmental constraints present (informed by input from support the regeneration of the town centre) or long term potential subject to appropriate policy available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. changes. Suitability is also subject to and management of any physical, heritage and environmental relevant service areas and infrastructure providers); and where Garage off Bradford and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a constraints. For instance as a former garage site investigation and remediation or any contamination appropriate the outcome of a visual impact and landscape SHF027 development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 0 7 0 Street, Shifnal would be required. The site is within proximity of a conservation area and a number of listed sensitivity assessment. Suitability of open market residential purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the development one the ground floor is also subject to the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of demonstration that this would support the regeneration of the significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. town centre. than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of subject to acceptable safeguarding. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject The site is located within the Shifnal development boundary and near the town centre, therefore For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also the site is suitable for open market residential development subject to appropriate management of developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by any physical, heritage and environmental constraints. For instance the ability to access the site is considered suitable for development subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure subject to highway approval. The site is located within a conservation area, therefore development assessment and management of any impact on the physical; The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically the relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet site is located within a conservation area. available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. 27 Shrewsbury Road, the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a the sites development potential would also depend on suitable SHF028 adjacent to St Mary's dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 0 5 0 management of any other physical, heritage and environmental Church, Shifnal is also within proximity of a listed building, therefore development is subject to an assessment of purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire constraints present (informed by input from relevant service impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in areas and infrastructure providers); and the outcome of a visual development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The buildings fronting onto Shrewsbury Road may have and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of heritage value. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for Annscroft is located within the Longden, Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, residential development. Longden Common, and Lower Common/Exfords Green For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Community Cluster. Within Annscroft open market residential The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Annscroft is located within the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Longden, Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, Longden Common, and Lower Common/Exfords Green development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Community Cluster. Within Annscroft open market residential development is limited to infilling, conversions on suitable sites within the village. The guideline The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the village. The guideline across the across the Community Cluster is 10-50 additional dwellings relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Community Cluster is 10-50 additional dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and during the plan period, current commitments and completions available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. completions total around 50 dwellings (as at the 31st March 2017). As such open market residential total around 50 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such open Land adjoining Longden development on this site may be acceptable, subject to material considerations including the and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a market residential development consisting of a group of ANN003 application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 5 0 0 Road, Annscroft dwellings on this site may be acceptable, subject to material environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an appropriate access is also purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy subject to highway approval. the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless However, Annscroft has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the environmental constraints present. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community However, Annscroft has not been identified as a proposed considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered assessment will be undertaken. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is located within the Four Crosses development boundary so the principle of development is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for accepted, subject to material considerations. However, Four Crosses has not been identified as a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable residential development. Suitability of the site for open market Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub and therefore may not have a development The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development is subject to appropriate management boundary in the future. Material considerations include suitable management of any physical, process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. of the physical, heritage and environmental constraints present environmental and heritage constraints present. For instance the site is within 300m of one or more owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a (informed by input from relevant service areas and Listed Buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of Land adj. Brockway, available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of BIT020 ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. 0 7 0 Four Crosses significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless However, Four Crosses has not been identified as a proposed development. Furthermore, the site is also within 250m of a Wildlife Site, therefore development is study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as achievability and viability of development, a separate viability part of the Local Plan Review. assessment will be undertaken.

F15 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Site has previous permissions for residential development in The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by 2011 and 2007 both now lapsed. The site has been the to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Site is suitable for residential development subject to brownfield remediation issues and any site subject of a lapsed Planning Application for a relevant use, considered suitable for development subject to appropriate contamination as a result of previous use history. The site is also contains part of a Conservation obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable but the site is currently occupied (the user has not confirmed assessment and management of any impact on the physical; Area. Therefore development of this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing that they can/will vacate the site to allow its development, environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely landowner and developer. but their lease will expire at a specified point in the future or part of the site is within a Conservation Area and the site is then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. there is confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is within 300m of one or more Listed Buildings. If the assessment Newtown Garage, desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and subject to some other form of constraint (time limited or can shows no adverse effect or suitable mitigation were possible, the BNP014 diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 7 0 Baschurch the conclusions reached. The site is also within 300m of a Listed Building. Development is subject to be removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a sites development potential would also depend on suitable residential development is generally considered viable, unless an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of the listed building where this shows willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no management of any other physical, heritage and environmental there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number legal or ownership problems which could limit development, constraints present (informed by input from relevant service of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally beyond those which mean the site is not immediately areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Furthermore the development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site associated settlement offers a range of services and facilities achievability and viability of development, a separate viability becoming available for development in the future. suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site. assessment will be undertaken.

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster settlement, specifically Condover within the Dorrington, Stapleton and Condover Community Cluster. Within Condover, development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions within the development boundary. As such open market residential development on this site may be acceptable, subject to material For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance part of the site is located the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically within a conservation area, the remainder is in proximity of a conservation area. the site is also in obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable Condover within the Dorrington, Stapleton and Condover proximity of a registered park and one or more listed buildings, therefore development of this site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Community Cluster. As such open market residential subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is landowner and developer. development on this site may be acceptable, subject to material significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership Land at Home Farm, against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and problems which could limit development. Therefore CON001 necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. The site is also in proximity diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire environmental constraints present. 25 0 0 Condover information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests of a local wildlife site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this residential development is generally considered viable, unless Furthermore, Condover has not been identified as a proposed that there is confidence in the site being available and will locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the harm. The site is also in proximity of trees subject to TPO protection, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered it/they can be safeguarded. The ability to provide an appropriate access is also subject to highway issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as approval. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability part of the Local Plan Review. Furthermore, Condover has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or assessment will be undertaken. Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

This primarily brownfield site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Exford Green is located within the Longden, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, Longden Common, and Lower The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Exford Green is located within the Longden, Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, Longden Common, and Lower Common/Exfords Green developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Common/Exfords Green Community Cluster. Within Exford Community Cluster. Within Exford Green open market residential development is limited to infilling, the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Green open market residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the village. The guideline across the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the Community Cluster is 10-50 additional dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing village. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 10-50 completions total around 50 dwellings (as at the 31st March 2017). As such open market residential relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. additional dwellings during the plan period, current development consisting of a group of houses and/or conversions on this site may be acceptable, available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a commitments and completions total around 50 dwellings (as at subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any Land at the Works, and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 31st March 2017). As such open market residential development suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the EXG005 development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire consisting of a group of dwellings and/or conversions on this site 10 0 0 Exford Green ability to provide an appropriate access is also subject to highway approval. The site is also in proximity of ancient woodland, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless may be acceptable, subject to material considerations including natural asset. Where deterioration or loss is likely, national policy states that the need for, and the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable benefits of, the development should clearly outweigh the loss if development is to be acceptable. development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints However, Exford Green has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific present. Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the However, Exford Green has not been identified as a proposed SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. assessment will be undertaken. Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

F16 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. Its availability is unknown. The site is located within an existing The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Hook-a-Gate is located within Community Cluster, specifically Hook-a-Gate is located within the the Longden, Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, Longden Common, and Lower Common/Exfords Green Community Cluster. Within Hook-a-Gate open market residential development is limited to infilling, Longden, Hook-a-Gate, Annscroft, Longden Common, and Lower groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the village. The guideline across the Common/Exfords Green Community Cluster. Within Hook-a-Gate Community Cluster is 10-50 additional dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and open market residential development is limited to infilling, completions total around 50 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites within the As such open market residential development consisting of a group of dwellings on the elements of developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by village. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 10-50 this site that are not located within flood zones 2 and/or 3, may be acceptable, subject to material the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure additional dwellings during the plan period, current considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable commitments and completions total around 50 dwellings (as at of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. The element of the site located in flood The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing 31st March 2017). zones 2 and/or 3 would only be considered to have development potential if it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and will not relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. As such open market residential development consisting of a increase risk elsewhere. available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a group of dwellings on the elements of this site that are not junction Longden Rd & and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a located within flood zones 2 and/or 3, may be acceptable, HKE004 Other such considerations include the fact that the site is in proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, 3 0 0 Hanley Lane therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire subject to material considerations including the application of Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. The site is the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. also within proximity of one or more listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally The element of the site located in flood zones 2 and/or 3 would assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific only be considered to have development potential if it is of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception against the public benefits of development. The site is also in proximity of trees subject to TPO achievability and viability of development, a separate viability test); the risk can be mitigated; and will not increase risk protection, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected assessment will be undertaken. elsewhere. tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. However, Hook-a-Gate has not been identified as a proposed However, Hook-a-Gate has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Hopton Within Hopton open market residential development is limited to infilling/conversions on suitable For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the is located within the Great Ness, Little Ness, Wilcott, sites within the village. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 10-15 additional dwellings developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Hopton/Valeswood, Kinton, and during the plan period, current commitments and completions total around 60 dwellings (as at 31st the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Felton Butler Community Cluster. Within Hopton open market March 2017). As such infill development on the site may be acceptable, subject to material obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable residential development is limited to infilling/conversions on considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing suitable sites within the village. The guideline across the of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is in proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. Community Cluster is 10-15 additional dwellings during the plan designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a period, current commitments and completions total around 60 will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such infill development on HPV001 Land at St Chads Farm harm. The site is also in prioximity of a scheduled monument, therefore development is subject to development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire the site may be acceptable, subject to material considerations 5 0 0 an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally constraints present. weighed against the public benefits of development. However, Hopton has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific However, Hopton has not been identified as a proposed Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

As a brownfield site within the settlement boundary, it is a suitable location in principle for open The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject market residential development. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also heritage and environmental constraints. For instance the existing building is attractive and of historic interest and as such should be retained. Furthermore the site is located within Shrewsbury developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by considered suitable for development subject to appropriate Conservation Area. Therefore development of this site is subject to an assessment of impact on the the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure assessment and management of any impact on the physical; specified asset(s). Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of significance of the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically the designated heritage asset(s) is likely then development needs to meet the tests set out in paragraph scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing site contains an attractive existing building and is located within 133 of the NPPF. landowner and developer. the Shrewsbury Conservation Area. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, development. The site is also located within proximity of one or more listed buildings and scheduled The Hollies, Sutton The site has been recently promoted for sale for residential desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a the sites development potential would also depend on suitable monuments. Consequently development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of SHR002 development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire management of other physical, heritage and environmental 13 0 0 Road, Shrewsbury the setting of this heritage asset(s). The site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total residential development is generally considered viable, unless constraints present (informed by input from relevant service loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Such constraints of development. The site contains numerous trees subject to TPO's there are also numerous trees considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific include the presence of TPO's on the site; and the sites proximity subject to TPO's in proximity of the site. Therefore development is subject to an assessment of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the to one or more listed buildings and scheduled monuments. impact on the protected tree(s) on/in proximity of the site in order to demonstrate how they can be achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services safeguarded. The site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to assessment will be undertaken. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of these safeguarding measures being deemed acceptable. As a result the suitability of the site is dependent on the outcome of necessary supporting assessments. the site.

F17 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is considered available, achievable and viable (subject to For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the any further necessary viability assessment). The site is developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by considered suitable for development subject to appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure assessment and management of any impact on the physical; The site is suitable in principle for open market residential development subject to assessment and obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically the management of physical, environmental and heritage constraints. For instance the site is located The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing site is located within proximity of a Ramsar site, conservation within 1km of a Ramsar Site, consequently, development is subject to an appropriate assessment process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. area and scheduled monument. The ability to provide an under the Habitats Regulations. The site is located in proximity of a conservation area and scheduled owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a appropriate access for an alternative use is subject to highway monument. Therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the Richmond House, available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a comments. setting of this heritage asset(s). The site is considered suitable for development in relation to this SHR003 ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, 0 11 0 Harlescott, Shrewsbury matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless the sites development potential would also depend on suitable less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. management of any other physical, heritage and environmental development. The ability to provide an appropriate access to the site for an alternative use is subject available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally constraints present (informed by input from relevant service to highway comments. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services assessment will be undertaken. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject to become available for the relevant use, but the site is developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to any further necessary viability assessment). The site is also currently occupied by a Scout Group with 25 yr. lease so site the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure considered suitable for development subject to appropriate As a part brownfield and part greenfield site within the development boundary, the site is will only become available during this time if an alternative obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable assessment and management of any impact on the physical; considered suitable in principle for open market residential development. However, suitability is location can be found for them (the user has not confirmed scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Specifically subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the need to provide an alternative location for the Scout Group. The ability to that they can/will vacate the site to allow its development, landowner and developer. TPO's on site, impact on Grade 2 Listed Building 'The Elms' and provide an appropriate access into the site is subject to highway approval. The site is within but their lease will expire at a specified point in the future or Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a satisfactory access. Land at the Elms, there is confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a If suitable mitigation of the identified constraints were possible, SHR011 proximity of 'The Elms' Grade 2 Listed Building and a Conservation Area, therefore development is 15 0 0 Belvidere, Shrewsbury subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where subject to some other form of constraint (time limited or can diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire the sites development potential would also depend on suitable this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet be removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of any other physical, heritage and environmental a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. constraints present (informed by input from relevant service weighed against the public benefits of development. The site also contains and is in proximity to legal or ownership problems which could limit development, Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual TPO's, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the protected tree(s) on/in proximity of the site in order to demonstrate how they can be safeguarded. beyond those which mean the site is not immediately considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site achievability and viability of development, a separate viability and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of becoming available for development in the future. assessment will be undertaken. the site.

The site is considered viable and achievable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). It is not currently considered to be available, but is it considered that it is likely to become available in the future. Where necessary, this will be The portion of the site located within flood zones 2 and/or 3 is unsuitable for development. This For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the informed by further discussions with landowners; their portion of site would only be considered appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by representatives; and any further necessary viability assessment sequential and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure work. The element of the site located outside flood zones 2 The remainder of the site is suitable for development subject to appropriate management of any currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable and/or 3 is considered suitable for development subject to physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the suitability of the access to can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing appropriate assessment and management of any impact on the serve the redevelopment of the site is subject to highway approval. The site is located within a Conservation Area and adjacent to a Grade 2 listed building, therefore development of this site is lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. physical; environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. Site at New Zealand subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a total loss of confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Specifically heritage assists and satisfactory access. If suitable significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet the tests set to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, the sites SHR014 House, Abbey Foregate, out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire development potential would also depend on suitable 0 14 0 Shrewsbury against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore dependent on the willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of any other physical, heritage and environmental necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. Furthermore, the site legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. constraints present (informed by input from relevant service contains and is within proximity of TPO's. Consequently development is subject to an assessment of beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual impact on the protected tree(s) on/in proximity of the site in order to demonstrate how they can be safeguarded. The site is also within 100m of a Local Nature Reserve so development is subject to an available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. The element of the assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the site located in flood zones 2 and/or 3 would only be considered and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential benefits of development outweigh the harm. assessment will be undertaken. and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered likely to become available; achievable; and developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is also considered suitable for development subject to obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable appropriate assessment and management of any impact on the Site is currently occupied as a medical / office facility with Site is located in a longstanding established residential area and would be suitable for open market scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing physical; environmental; or heritage constraints to the site. associated car parking. However, the site has been submitted residential development subject to assessment and management of physical, environmental and/or landowner and developer. Specifically the site contains listed buildings, is located in a through the ‘call for sites’ for a relevant use, and this heritage constraints. For instance the site contains and is in proximity of a listed buildings; it is also Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a conservation area and proximity of other heritage assets. located in a conservation area; and proximity of a scheduled monument, therefore development of submission confirms that the site is available now; that there desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, this site is subject to a heritage impact assessment. Where this shows that substantial harm to or a is a willing landowner/developer; and no legal or ownership SHR015 Land at Whitehall diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire the sites development potential would also depend on suitable 0 30 0 total loss of significance of the designated heritage asset is likely then development needs to meet problems which could limit development. Therefore residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of any other physical, heritage and environmental the tests set out in paragraph 133 of the NPPF. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. constraints present (informed by input from relevant service should be weighed against the public benefits of development. This site’s suitability is therefore that there is confidence in the site being available and will dependent on the necessary assessment(s) being undertaken and the conclusions reached. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual come forward for development. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services achievability and viability of development, a separate viability and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of assessment will be undertaken. the site.

F18 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable Site is located in a longstanding established residential area and would be suitable for open market (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for open The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development subject to assessment and management of physical, environmental and/or market residential development. Suitability of the site for open relevant use, but this submission does not specify that the landowner and developer. heritage constraints. For instance the ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway market residential development is subject to appropriate Shrewsbury Training site is available for this form of development and subsequent Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a approval. The site is also within 300m of conservation area and 100m of Grade 2 listed building, management of the physical, heritage and environmental and Development therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of investigations have not been able to clarify whether the site desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a constraints present (informed by input from relevant service SHR016 these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely is available for this form of development. Therefore diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 9 0 0 Centre, Racecourse areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial information gathered for the purpose of this study is unable residential development is generally considered viable, unless outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Crescent, Shrewsbury harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the to confirm that the site is available for this form of there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally safeguarding. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable The site is located within the development boundary and forms part of the Shrewsbury South SUE. obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for Therefore open market residential development is suitable in principle. Suitability is subject to scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is residential development. Suitability of the site for residential appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For landowner and developer. owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is development is subject to appropriate management of the instance the need to provide an appropriate highway access using Sutton Grange Drive, approved by Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a Highway Authority. The site is just within 300m of Grade 2* Listed Building - the Greek Orthodox available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Land at Oteley Road, desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a Church, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the problems which could limit development. Therefore (informed by input from relevant service areas and SHR080 diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 32 0 0 Shrewsbury setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of residential development is generally considered viable, unless significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less that there is confidence in the site being available and will a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of come forward for development. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development. The site is in a prominent location and adjacent to residential dwellings and open Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of space, therefore site design and layout must reflect this location. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for residential development. The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject Greenfield site within development boundary, so no in principle restrictions. However, For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to any further necessary viability assessment). Approximately approximately 66% of the site is located within flood zone 2 and/or 3, therefore this element of the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by site would only be considered appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential 66% of the site is located within flood zone 2 and/or 3, therefore the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. The this element of the site would only be considered appropriate if The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable remainder of the site may be suitable for development subject to confirmation of the ability to it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing provide an appropriate access to and into the site (which is currently unclear), any proposed access exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. Land to north-west of is subject to highway approval. Suitability is also subject to appropriate management of any physical, risk elsewhere. The remainder of the site may be suitable for heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance, the site is adjacent to Reabrook Valley and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development subject to confirmation of the ability to provide an SHR165 Hazeldine Way, Local Nature Reserve, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 0 10 0 appropriate access to and into the site (which is currently Shrewsbury locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire unclear), any proposed access is subject to highway approval. there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless the harm. The site is also in proximity of a conservation area, therefore development is subject to an Suitability is also subject to appropriate management of the development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number (informed by input from relevant service areas and considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed infrastructure providers); and where appropriate the outcome of against the public benefits of development. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment). However, two The site is located within the Shrewsbury development boundary. However, two elements of the The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for elements of the site (totalling approximately 80% of the site) site (totalling approximately 80% of the site) comprises an identified outdoor sports facility. residential development. comprises an identified outdoor sports facility. Development on Development on this element of the site is therefore not appropriate unless an assessment has For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the this element of the site is therefore not appropriate unless an been undertaken which clearly indicates that the open space or facility is surplus to requirements or developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the loss would be replaced by equivalent or better provision. The remainder of the site is suitable assessment has been undertaken which clearly indicates that the the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure for development subject to management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints open space or facility is surplus to requirements or the loss The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable present. For instance the site is in proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, development is therefore would be replaced by equivalent or better provision. The relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows remainder of the site is suitable for development subject to Reman Services Sports available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and management of any physical, heritage and environmental and Social Club off economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. However, the site is considered suitable for and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a constraints present. Specifically proximity of environmental and SHR178 development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site also contains a development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 0 5 0 Albert Road, heritage assets. Veteran Tree/tree protected by a Tree Preservation Order, development is therefore subject to an purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire If suitable mitigation of this identified constraint were possible, Shrewsbury assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless safeguarded. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, the sites development potential would also depend on suitable development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is within 300m of a Listed Building so development is management of any other physical, heritage and environmental Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where constraints present (informed by input from relevant service considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet areas and infrastructure providers) and the outcome of a visual issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the site is considered suitable for achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. assessment will be undertaken. and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of the site.

F19 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. The site is located within the development boundary. Therefore open market residential development is subject to appropriate management of the available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development is suitable in principle. Suitability is subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Land at Hollydene, physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a (informed by input from relevant service areas and SHR211 appropriate access is subject to highway approval. The site is in proximity to trees subject to TPO development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 9 0 Shrewsbury infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of protection, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. tree(s) in order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered available; achievable; and viable (subject For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the to any further necessary viability assessment) for open market developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by residential development. Approximately 50% of the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is located within the development boundary. However approximately 50% of the site is identified as an outdoor sports facility. Therefore this area of the obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable identified as an outdoor sports facility. Therefore this area of the site is not appropriate for site is not appropriate for development unless an assessment scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing development unless an assessment has been undertaken which clearly indicates that the open Shropshire Council Officers have confidence that the site is has been undertaken which clearly indicates that the open space landowner and developer. space or facility is surplus to requirements or the loss would be replaced by equivalent or better owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is or facility is surplus to requirements or the loss would be Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a provision. The remainder of the site is suitable in principle for open market residential development available to develop now; there are no legal or ownership replaced by equivalent or better provision. The remainder of the The Pitch and Putt, subject to material considerations and management of any physical, heritage and environmental desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a problems which could limit development. Therefore site is suitable in principle for open market residential SHR217 constraints present. For instance the suitability of the access to serve alternative uses of the site will diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 35 15 Shrewsbury information gathered for the purposes of this study suggests development subject to appropriate management of the require highways approval. The site is in proximity of a conservation area, therefore development is residential development is generally considered viable, unless that there is confidence in the site being available and will physical, heritage and environmental constraints present subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet come forward for development. (informed by input from relevant service areas and Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the outcome of considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific weighed against the public benefits of development. a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services achievability and viability of development, a separate viability and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of assessment will be undertaken. the site.

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Stapleton is located within The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, the Dorrington, Stapleton and Condover Community Cluster. Within Stapleton open market specifically Stapleton is located within the Dorrington, Stapleton residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the and Condover Community Cluster. Within Stapleton open market within the identified development boundary. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 5 additional dwellings during the plan period, current developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses commitments and completions total around 10 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). As such open the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure and conversions on suitable sites within the identified market residential development consisting of a group of dwellings on this site may be acceptable, obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable development boundary. subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing The guideline across the Community Cluster is 5 additional suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and ability to provide an appropriate access is subject to highway approval. The site is located within available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a completions total around 10 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a As such open market residential development consisting of a on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse STA003 Court Farm development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire group of dwellings on this site may be acceptable, subject to 5 0 0 effect, there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. The site is also within proximity of a scheduled monument and one or more purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and environmental constraints present. significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Furthermore, Stapleton has not been identified as a proposed than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the development. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within Furthermore, Stapleton has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. part of the Local Plan Review.

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Stapleton is located within the Dorrington, Stapleton and Condover Community Cluster. Within Stapleton open market The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites specifically Stapleton is located within the Dorrington, Stapleton within the identified development boundary. and Condover Community Cluster. Within Stapleton open market The guideline across the Community Cluster is 5 additional dwellings during the plan period, current For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the residential development is limited to infilling, groups of houses commitments and completions total around 10 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). Furthermore a developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by and conversions on suitable sites within the identified small portion of the site is located within flood zones 2 and/or 3, therefore this element of the site the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure would only be considered appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or development boundary. obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. The guideline across the Community Cluster is 5 additional The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing The remainder of the site may be suitable for open market residential development consisting of a dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. group of dwellings on this site may be acceptable, subject to material considerations including the completions total around 10 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and As such open market residential development consisting of a environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an appropriate access is and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a group of dwellings on the element of the site located outside STA006 Ye Olde Farm subject to highway approval. The site is located within proximity of a Local Wildlife Site, therefore development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 5 0 0 flood zones 2 and/or 3 may be acceptable, subject to material development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. The site is also within MD3 and any suitable management of physical, heritage and development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally proximity of a scheduled monument and one or more listed buildings, therefore development is environmental constraints present. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where Furthermore, Stapleton has not been identified as a proposed issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within weighed against the public benefits of development. assessment will be undertaken. the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Furthermore, Stapleton has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community part of the Local Plan Review. Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

F20 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is considered available, achievable and viable. The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Weston Lullingfields is Weston Lullingfields is located within the Weston Lullingfields, residential development. located within the Weston Lullingfields, Weston Wharf and Weston Common Community Cluster. Weston Wharf and Weston Common Community Cluster. Within For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Within Weston Lullingfields open market residential development is limited to infilling, conversions Weston Lullingfields open market residential development is developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by and small-groups of up to 5 dwellings on suitable sites within the village. The guideline across the limited to infilling, conversions and small-groups of up to 5 Community Cluster is 15-20 additional dwellings during the plan period, current commitments and the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure dwellings on suitable sites within the village. The guideline across completions total around 16 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable the Community Cluster is 15-20 additional dwellings during the As such a small group of up to 5 dwellings on the site may be suitable subject to material relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing plan period, current commitments and completions total around considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. for instance the ability to provide an 16 dwellings (as at 31st March 2017). and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a appropriate access is subject to highway approval. the site is also in proximity of one or more listed As such a small group of up to 5 dwellings on the site may be WLU001 adjacent Ash Grove development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a 5 0 0 buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the suitable subject to material considerations including the purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. present. development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally However, Weston Lullingfields has not been identified as a However, Weston Lullingfields has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub or Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. inclusion within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are assessment will be undertaken. considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, specifically Marton is located within the Brompton, Marton, Middleton, Pentreheyling, Priest Weston, Stockton and Rorrington Community Cluster. Within Marton open market residential development is limited to infilling and The site is considered available, achievable and viable. conversions on suitable sites. The housing guideline for the Community cluster is around 20 For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is located adjacent to an existing Community Cluster, dwellings. This site may be suitable for infill development, subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable management of physical, developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by specifically Marton is located within the Brompton, Marton, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an appropriate the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure Middleton, Pentreheyling, Priest Weston, Stockton and access is subject to highway approval. The site is in proximity of a local wildlife site, therefore obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable Rorrington Community Cluster. Within Marton open market development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development is limited to infilling and conversions on assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there will be a need to consider relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is landowner and developer. suitable sites. The housing guideline for the Community cluster is whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the harm. The site is also in available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a around 20 dwellings. This site may be suitable for infill proximity of a SSSI, therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the notified and no legal or ownership problems which could limit desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a development, subject to material considerations including the special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to MTN004 Site B development. Therefore information gathered for the diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable 5 0 0 consider whether the benefits outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs. The site is within proximity of a Ramsar Site, therefore purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in residential development is generally considered viable, unless management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints development is subject to an appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations. The site is the site being available and will come forward for there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. present. also in proximity of one or more listed buildings, therefore development is subject to an assessment development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore, Marton has not been identified as a proposed of impact on the significance of the setting of these heritage assets. Where this shows that considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed achievability and viability of development, a separate viability the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered against the public benefits of development. assessment will be undertaken. appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as Furthermore, Marton has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the part of the Local Plan Review. SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered suitable; available; achievable; and viable Suitable location subject to appropriate design and management of the physical, heritage and obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable (subject to any further necessary viability assessment) for environmental constraints present. For instance the ability to provide an appropriate access to and The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing residential development. Suitability of the site for residential into the site is subject to highway approval. Access to services and facilities in the town may be process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. development is subject to appropriate management of the constrained by highway and traffic issues associated with the rail crossing, this will require due owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a consideration. The site is within proximity of a conservation Area and one or more listed buildings, physical, heritage and environmental constraints present Land behind 18-34 available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of (informed by input from relevant service areas and WEM018 ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 0 38 0 Aston Road, Wem these heritage assets. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total loss of significance is likely infrastructure providers); and where appropriate the outcome of Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless then development must meet a number of tests set out in national policy. If less than substantial a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits of development. However, the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of safeguarding. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific the site. issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability assessment will be undertaken.

The site is considered achievable and viable. Its availability is unknown. The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Prees Heath within the Whitchurch Rural & The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Prees Heath within the Ightfield and Calverhall Community Cluster. Within Prees Heath For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Whitchurch Rural & Ightfield and Calverhall Community Cluster. Within Prees Heath appropriate appropriate development is limited to the allocated sites, developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by development is limited to the allocated sites, infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites well the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure sites well related to the built form of Prees Heath. However, the south-west corner of the site is related to the built form of Prees Heath. located within flood zones 2 and/or 3, therefore this element of the site would only be considered obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable The site has been the subject of a lapsed Planning The site may be considered suitable for open market residential appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception test); the risk can scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing Application for a relevant use, but it is understood that there development, excluding the element of the site located within be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. landowner and developer. remains development interest; the site is owned by a willing flood zones 2 and/or 3, subject to material considerations The remainder of the site may be considered suitable for open market residential development, Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any landowner and/or developer; it is available to develop now; including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance and there are no legal or ownership problems which could suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental PRH004 Land at Invictus diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire 10 0 0 comments will be needed from highway department regarding highway capacity and access. The limit development. Therefore information gathered for the constraints present. The element of the site located within flood residential development is generally considered viable, unless site is also within proximity of a SAC and Ramsar site, therefore development is subject to an purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in zones 2 and/or 3 would only be considered appropriate if it is there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations. the site being available and will come forward for considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception However, Prees Heath has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally development. test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific elsewhere. SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the However, Prees Heath has not been identified as a proposed Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Therefore due to uncertainty about availability and the status of Prees Heath within the Local Plan Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the assessment will be undertaken. Review, the site is rejected. Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review.

F21 Appendix F: Sites from the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA)

Site Strategic Land Availability Assessment Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period SLAA Site Address Suitability Availability Achievability/Viability Summary 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Reference

The site is located within an existing Community Cluster, specifically Prees Heath within the Whitchurch Rural & Ightfield and Calverhall Community Cluster. Within Prees Heath appropriate development is limited to the allocated sites, infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable The site has been promoted during the 2017 Call for Sites for The site is considered achievable and viable. Its availability is sites well related to the built form of Prees Heath. However, the south-west corner of the site is residential development. unknown. The site is located within an existing Community located within flood zones 2 and/or 3, therefore this element of the site would only be considered appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential and/or exception test); the risk can For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Cluster, specifically Prees Heath within the Whitchurch Rural & be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by Ightfield and Calverhall Community Cluster. Within Prees Heath The remainder of the site may be considered suitable for open market residential development, the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure appropriate development is limited to the allocated sites, subject to material considerations including the application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any The site has been submitted through the ‘call for sites’ for a obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable infilling, groups of houses and conversions on suitable sites well suitable management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance relevant use, and this submission confirms that the site is scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing related to the built form of Prees Heath. comments will be needed from highway department regarding highway capacity and access. The available now; that there is a willing landowner/developer; landowner and developer. The site may be considered suitable for open market residential site is also within proximity of a SAC and Ramsar site, therefore development is subject to an and no legal or ownership problems which could limit Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a development, subject to material considerations including the appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations. The site is also in proximity of a SSSI, PRH006 Heath Road development. Therefore information gathered for the desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a application of SAMDev Plan Policy MD3 and any suitable 10 0 0 therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on the notified special interest features of the SSSI. Where an adverse impact is likely, there will be a need to consider whether the purposes of this study suggests that there is confidence in diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire management of physical, heritage and environmental constraints benefits outweigh both the harm to the special features and any broader impacts on the national the site being available and will come forward for residential development is generally considered viable, unless present. network of SSSIs. The site also contains and is in proximity of trees subject to TPO protection, development. there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. However, Prees Heath has not been identified as a proposed therefore development is subject to an assessment of impact on this/these protected tree(s) in Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or Community Hub within the order to demonstrate how it/they can be safeguarded. considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within However, Prees Heath has not been identified as a proposed Strategic/Principal/Key Centre or issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered Community Hub within the Local Plan Review and the site size threshold for inclusion within the achievability and viability of development, a separate viability appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as SLAA is likely to exceed those which are considered appropriate within any future Community Clusters proposed as part of the Local Plan Review. assessment will be undertaken. part of the Local Plan Review. Therefore due to uncertainty about availability and the status of Prees Heath within the Local Plan Review, the site is rejected.

For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the Shropshire Council Officers understand that the site is likely developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by to become available for the relevant use, but the site is the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure The site is considered likely to become available, viable and currently occupied (the user has not confirmed that they obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable achievable. Where necessary, this will be informed by further can/will vacate the site to allow its development, but their scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing discussions with landowners and/or their representatives and The site is located within an existing residential area within the Whitchurch development boundary, lease will expire at a specified point in the future or there is landowner and developer. any further necessary viability assessment. The site is also consequently it is considered a suitable site for residential development. However the site is within confidence that they will vacate the site) and/or it is subject Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a considered suitable for development subject to appropriate proximity of a wildlife site, therefore development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this to some other form of constraint (time limited or can be desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a management of the physical, heritage and environmental locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, Garages on Wayland removed). It is however understood that it is owned by a diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire constraints present (informed by input from relevant service there will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh WHT001 willing landowner and/or developer; and that there are no residential development is generally considered viable, unless areas and infrastructure providers) and where appropriate the 3 0 0 Close, Whitchurch the harm. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. legal or ownership problems which could limit development, there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. Planning Permission (19/01553/FUL) granted for 2 dwellings on approximately 2/3 of the site after beyond those which mean the site is not immediately Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services 31st March 2019. available. Therefore information gathered for the purposes considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of of this study suggests that there is confidence in the site issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the the site. becoming available for development in the future. achievability and viability of development, a separate viability Planning Permission (19/01553/FUL) granted for 2 dwellings on Planning Permission (19/01553/FUL) granted for 2 dwellings assessment will be undertaken. approximately 2/3 of the site after 31st March 2019. on approximately 2/3 of the site after 31st March 2019. Planning Permission (19/01553/FUL) granted for 2 dwellings on approximately 2/3 of the site after 31st March 2019..

The site is located within the development boundary, and so residential development is in line with policy. However, approximately 40% of the site is located within flood zone 2, therefore this part of For a scheme to be ‘viable’ it must make financial sense to both the The site is considered available, viable and achievable (subject to the site would only be considered appropriate if it is considered necessary (through the sequential developer and the landowner, within the constraints imposed by any further necessary viability assessment). The site is located and/or exception test); the risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. The the market; planning policies; and any required infrastructure within the development boundary, and so residential remainder of the site is considered suitable for development, subject to appropriate management of obligations. It is within this context that the NPPF defines a viable development is in line with policy. However, approximately 40% any physical, heritage and environmental constraints present. For instance the site is within 250m of The site was represented during the SAMDev Site Allocations scheme as one that provides competitive returns to a willing of the site is located within flood zone 2, therefore this part of a Wildlife Site, and so development is subject to an assessment of the impact on this locally designated site. Where this assessment shows a significant and unavoidable adverse effect, there process for a relevant use, and it is understood that it is landowner and developer. the site would only be considered appropriate if it is considered will be a need to consider whether the social and economic benefits of development outweigh the owned by a willing landowner and/or developer; it is Shropshire’s geographical location and rural character make it a necessary (through the sequential and/or exception test); the Land at Sherrymill Hill, available to develop now; and there are no legal or desirable place to live. Like many other Counties, Shropshire has a risk can be mitigated; and it will not increase risk elsewhere. The WHT005 harm. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to 0 9 0 Whitchurch acceptable safeguarding. The site is also within 30m of multiple Veteran Trees/ trees protected by a ownership problems which could limit development. diverse housing market. However, despite this within Shropshire remainder of the site is considered suitable for development, Tree Preservation Order. Development is subject to an assessment of impact on these protected Therefore information gathered for the purposes of this residential development is generally considered viable, unless subject to appropriate management of any physical, heritage trees in order to demonstrate how they can be safeguarded. However, the site is considered study suggests that there is confidence in the site being there are site specific issues which impact upon viability. and environmental constraints present (informed by input from suitable for development in relation to this matter, subject to acceptable safeguarding. The site is available and will come forward for development. Consequently, residential development upon any site is generally relevant service areas and infrastructure providers); and the within 300m of a Conservation Zone. Development is subject to an assessment of impact on the significance of the setting of this heritage asset. Where this shows that substantial harm or a total considered achievable and viable unless there are site specific outcome of a visual impact and landscape sensitivity assessment. loss of significance is likely then development must meet a number of tests set out in national issues evident. However, to support this conclusion on the Furthermore the associated settlement offers a range of services policy. If less than substantial harm is likely, then this should be weighed against the public benefits achievability and viability of development, a separate viability and facilities suitable to meet the needs of potential occupiers of of development. However, the site is considered suitable for development in relation to this matter, assessment will be undertaken. the site. subject to acceptable safeguarding.

334 716 73

10% Reduction: 33 10% Reduction: 72 10% Reduction: 7 Total: 301 Total: 644 Total: 66

F22

Appendix G. Affordable Housing Sites Seeking Homes England (HE) Funding

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix G: Affordable Housign Sites Seeking Homes England (HE) Funding Site Details Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 8: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Net Net Reference Address Net Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Completions Outstanding Bishops Castle Castle Grange and Castle 5 0 5 5 0 0 Garage sites Corricks West Gate Westgate, Bridgnorth 8 0 8 8 0 0 Dark Lane, Dark Lane 24 0 24 24 0 0 Brosley

Lutwyche Rd Lutwyche Rd, Church Stretton 6 0 6 6 0 0

Doddington Adj Village Hall 14 0 14 14 0 0 Land To The South Of Roman Craven Arms 10 0 10 10 0 0 Downs, Craven Arms Scotland St Scotland St, Ellesmere 30 0 30 30 0 0 Lacy Rd Lacy Rd, Ludlow 2 0 2 2 0 0 Market Drayton Dalelands and Fairfields 5 0 5 5 0 0 Garage Sites St Marys St 6 St Marys St, Market Drayton 5 0 5 5 0 0 Mount Close Mount Close, Pontsbury 18 0 18 18 0 0 Callaughtons Ash Callaughtons Ash Much 14 0 14 14 0 0 Ph 2 Wenlock Twmpath Lane Twmpath Lane Gobowen 16 0 16 16 0 0 Beehive Pub Beehive Pub Shifnal 14 0 14 14 0 0 Heathgate works Heathgate Works 9 0 9 9 0 0 Dawson Rough Dawson Rough Shawbury 35 0 35 35 0 0 Canal Croft Canal Croft Whitchurch 9 0 9 9 0 0 Edgerton place Edgerton place, Whitchurch 2 0 2 2 0 0 Prees Community Site to be identified 20 0 20 20 0 0 Led Thompson Drive Thomson Drive, Whitchurch 5 0 5 5 0 0

Wayland Close Wayland Close Whitchurch 2 0 2 2 0 0 Whitchurch Pauls Moss, Whitchurch 71 0 71 71 0 0 Castle Srt Castle Street Clun 12 0 12 12 0 0 Crown Inn Crown Inn Claverley 5 0 5 5 0 0 341 341 0 0

10% Reduction: 34 10% Reduction: 0 10% Reduction: 0 Total: 307 Total: 0 Total: 0

G1

Appendix H. Windfall Sites

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix H: Windfall Sites

Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 8: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Reference 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total Windfall Allowance 299 299 598 299 299 598

H1

Appendix I. Lapsed Permissions

Shropshire Council – Five Year Housing Land Supply Statement (2019) Appendix I: Lapsed Permissions as at 31st March 2019

Site Availability Assessment Net Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Reference Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Application previously approved on the site at The site is in the ownership Subject to the development Subject to the development Previously approved appeal (09/01500/FUL). of an RSL and there is of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable application for 14 dwellings. Adj To Worfield Primary Site in ownership of an RSL. 09/01500/FUL known interest in bringing scheme, the development is scheme, the development is Known interest in 14 0 14 0 School, Worfield, Bridgnorth Site outside the the site forward for achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come developing the site. Likely in development boundary, development. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. the longer term. affordable housing exception site. Site is currently in use, however it has been Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development Application previously Land At Broseley Social Club, represented through the approved on the site of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable approved on the site Bank House, High Street, Planning Application 13/02623/FUL (13/02623/FUL). scheme, the development is scheme, the development is (13/02623/FUL). 6 0 6 0 Broseley, Shropshire, TF12 process. Brownfield site within the achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come Brownfield site within the 5EZ Site is considered settlement boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. settlement boundary. deliverable in the medium to long term. Site is currently in use, however it has been represented through the Application previously Site is considered Application previously Land At 1 Pinkham, Cleobury Planning Application No major viability issues 10/01319/FUL approved on the site achievable and likely to be approved on the site 9 0 9 0 Mortimer process. noted to date. (10/01319/FUL) delivered in the long term. (10/01319/FUL) Site is considered deliverable in the medium to long term.

Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development Known interest in approved on the site of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Land at Wilton Lodge, Clun developing the site in the Previously approved 11/02801/OUT (11/02801/OUT). scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 10 0 10 0 Road, Craven Arms past. Likely in the longer application for 10 dwellings. Site within the settlement achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come term. boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term.

Application previously approved on the site (11/04589/EIA). Much of Application previously Known interest in the development was approved on the site developing the site in the implemented. However (11/04589/EIA). Much of past. phases of the development, the development was Subject to the development Subject to the development Much of the development including an extra care implemented. However of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Wharf Road, Ellesmere, was implemented. However facility and some housing 11/04589/EIA phases of the development, scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 80 0 5 5 25 25 Shropshire phases of the development, were not implemented. including an extra care achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come including an extra care Site within the settlement facility and some housing forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. facility and some housing boundary. were not implemented. were not implemented. Subject to the development Site within the settlement Likely in the longer term. of a suitable and viable boundary. scheme, the development is achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

I1 Appendix I: Lapsed Permissions as at 31st March 2019

Site Availability Assessment Net Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Reference Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total

A detailed viability report has previously been undertaken which indicated that developer profit margins were marginal. In order to make the development viable, no Application to renew the affordable housing Application previously previous permission was contribution was to be approved on the site submitted and sought - however an (10/00968/FUL). More subsequently withdrawn. Subject to the development overage clause would have recent application Previously approved This indicates the of a suitable and viable been required which will Phoenix Garage, Great Hales (13/01162/FUL) withdrawn application for 14 dwellings. 10/00968/FUL landowner is still interested scheme, the development is allow for the provision of an 14 0 14 0 Street, Market Drayton in 2013, but Officer Report The site is likely to come in bringing the site forward achievable. Likely to come affordable housing at the time recommenced forward in the longer term. for development, subject to forward in the longer term. provision should the profit approval. an appropriate and viable margins increase due to an Brownfield site within the scheme. Likely in the longer increase in the housing settlement boundary. term. market. It is felt that in these circumstances the development would have been viable. As market conditions improve, the development will become increasigly viable.

Previously approved Building Control Application application for 6 dwellings. Application previously submitted and an approved Subject to the development Subject to the development Building Control Application approved on the site inspector has been of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable submitted and an approved The Stables, Prospect Road, (10/01264/FUL). 10/01264/FUL appointed scheme, the development is scheme, the development is inspector has been 6 0 6 0 Market Drayton Site within the settlement (12/02280/DOMFPC). achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come appointed boundary. Part brownfield Application may still be forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. (12/02280/DOMFPC). part greenfield. extant. Application may still be extant.

The site is an undeveloped parcel of land within the settlement boundary which Previously approved Application previously has previously been used Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 6 dwellings. Land adjacent to St Marys approved on the site for grazing of cattle but is of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development 10/04004/OUT Croft, Berrisford Road, (10/04004/OUT). currently vacant. scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 6 0 6 0 Market Drayton Site located within the Subject to the the achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is settlement boundary. development of an forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come appropriate and viable forward in the longer term. scheme, the site would be available.

Site was previously used by Previously approved Application previously the Citizen Advice Bureau. Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 5 dwellings. approved on the site The site is currently vacant. of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development 6 St Marys Street, Market 11/00983/FUL (11/00983/FUL). Known interest in scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 5 0 5 0 Drayton Brownfield site within the developing the site in the achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is settlement boundary. past. Likely in the longer forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come term. forward in the longer term.

I2 Appendix I: Lapsed Permissions as at 31st March 2019

Site Availability Assessment Net Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Reference Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total Application previously approved on the site Previously approved (11/03859/OUT). Subject to the development Subject to the development Known interest in application for 5 dwellings. Subsequent application of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Coach Garage, Village Road, developing the site in the Known interest in 11/03859/OUT (16/01958/FUL) withdrawn scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 5 0 5 0 Childs Ercall, Market Drayton past. Likely in the longer developing the site in the due to concerns regarding achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come term. past. Likely in the longer viability. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. term. Site within the settlement boundary.

Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development Previously approved Known interest in approved on the site of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable application for 6 dwellings. 117 Cheshire Street, Market developing the site in the 13/03051/FUL (13/03051/FUL). scheme, the development is scheme, the development is Known interest in 6 0 6 0 Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 1AE past. Likely in the longer Site located within the achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come developing the site. Likely in term. development boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. the longer term.

Previously approved Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 6 dwellings. approved on the site Site currently used for of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development Hall Farm, Lutwyche, Much (10/04555/FUL). agricultural purposes. Likely 10/04555/FUL scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 6 0 0 6 Wenlock Development involves the to be available in the longer achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is conversion of existing term. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come barns. forward in the longer term.

Previously approved The site is currently application for 6 dwellings. Application previously occupied by a large metal Brownfield site located Subject to the development Subject to the development approved on the site corrugated shed that is within the settlement Land Between 94A Willow of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable (10/00540/OUT). used for retailing meat. boundary. 10/00540/OUT Street and Oak Street, scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 6 0 0 6 Brownfield site located Known interest in Subject to the development Oswestry achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come within the settlement developing the site in the of a suitable and viable forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. boundary. past. Likely in the longer scheme, the development is term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

Site is currently being promoted for development Pentons Haulage And Brownfield site. and has previously been Site is considered Brownfield site. Coldstore, School Road, Brownfield site, but no Application previously represented through the achievable and likely to be Application previously 10/04143/OUT Ruyton XI Towns, major viability issues noted 80 0 25 25 80 0 approved on the site Planning Application delivered in the medium to approved on the site Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 to date. (10/04143/OUT) process. Site is considered long term. (10/04143/OUT) 1JT deliverable in the medium to long term.

Previously approved Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 9 dwellings. Known interest in approved on the site of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development Land Adjacent to Glen Havon, developing the site in the 10/05548/OUT (10/05548/OUT). scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 9 0 0 9 Dudelston Heath, Ellesmere past. Likely in the longer Site within the settlement achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is term. boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

I3 Appendix I: Lapsed Permissions as at 31st March 2019

Site Availability Assessment Net Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Reference Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total

Previously approved Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 6 dwellings. approved on the site Known interest in of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development The Uplands, Shifnal, 13/04841/FUL (13/04841/FUL). developing the site in the scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 29 0 29 0 Shropshire, TF11 9HA Site within the settlement past. Likely to be delivered. achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

Building Control Application Previously approved submitted and an approved Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 5 dwellings. Application previously inspector has been of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development Oakshall Farm, Plealey, approved on the site 11/01476/FUL appointed scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 5 0 5 0 Shrewsbury (11/01476/FUL). (12/02280/DOMFPC). achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is Barn conversion. Application may still be forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come extant. forward in the longer term.

The site is currently in Previously approved Application previously commercial use. However, Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 5 dwellings. approved on the site the has been interest in of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development Land at 1 Forge Way, 11/02325/FUL (11/02325/FUL). bringing the site forward for scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 5 0 0 5 Dorrington, Shrewsbury Brownfield site within the residential development in achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is settlement boundary. the past. Likely to come forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term.

Application previously approved on the site Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development Known interest in (13/00022/OUT). Bromfield, 66 Spring approved on the site of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable developing the site in the Subject to the development 13/00022/OUT Gardens, Shrewsbury , (13/00022/OUT). scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 9 0 9 9 0 past. Likely in the longer of a suitable and viable Shropshire, SY1 2TE Site within the settlement achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come term. scheme, the development is boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

Previously approved Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 6 dwellings. approved on the site Known interest in of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development Princess House, The Square, 14/04383/FUL (14/04383/FUL). developing the site in the scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 50 0 50 0 Shrewsbury, Shropshire Site within the settlement past. Likely to be delivered. achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

I4 Appendix I: Lapsed Permissions as at 31st March 2019

Site Availability Assessment Net Years 1-5: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Years 6 - 7: Forecasting (as at 31/03/2019) Beyond Plan Period Reference Address Suitability Availability Achievability Viability Summary Dwellings 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 Total 2024/25 2025/26 Total 2026+ Total

Previously approved application for 6 dwellings. Subject to the development Subject to the development Application previously Barn conversion scheme. Heath House Fam, Stanton Known interest in of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable approved on the site Subject to the development 11/03574/FUL Upon Hine Heath, developing the site in the scheme, the development is scheme, the development is 6 0 6 0 (11/03574/FUL). of a suitable and viable Shrewsbury past. Likely to be delivered. achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come Barn conversion scheme. scheme, the development is forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

Previously approved Application previously Subject to the development Subject to the development application for 6 dwellings. approved on the site Known interest in of a suitable and viable of a suitable and viable Subject to the development 67 Aston Street, Wem, 14/01530/REM (14/01530/REM). developing the site in the scheme, the development is scheme, the development is of a suitable and viable 6 0 6 0 Shropshire, SY4 5AU Site within the settlement past. Likely to be delivered. achievable. Likely to come achievable. Likely to come scheme, the development is boundary. forward in the longer term. forward in the longer term. achievable. Likely to come forward in the longer term.

372 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 39 271 25 51

10% Reduction: 27 10% Reduction: 5 Total: 244 Total: 46

I5