Quaker Religious Thought
Volume 7 Article 2
1-1-1962
Christ and Truth: The Catholicity and Protestantism of Friends
Hugh S. Barbour
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt
Part of the Christianity Commons
Recommended Citation Barbour, Hugh S. (1962) "Christ and Truth: The Catholicity and Protestantism of Friends," Quaker Religious Thought: Vol. 7 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol7/iss1/2
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Religious Thought by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Christ CHRIST
deeply Quakers despite tians, phrase merely Christ toric
human variety the distance experience the gelicalism Quakerism God affirmation
men churches as pect five we faith. and
necessary
insist,
other truth
The
generations
I
exclusive,
who or
and
to
and
would
meets
among
is
be Protestantism Yet
within
our IS
discovery.
the share
would
between
Christian and
and
about
with
usually the
claim may
by TRLTI{ confusing
of
Friends help and from
major
Light
and men
like
inward
inward
faiths.
truth
Friends,
were truth
hell)
modern
truth;
still
it,
God
of
Truth: to
to inseparable
rationalism.
the
in
Philadelphia
used
of
because
disagreements
Friends
interpret
witness
suggest eveit often as
link is
But
history
and
and
until experience.
Christ. one beginning;
Christ.
Starting
strong
found
can
Quakerism, to
knowledge
philosophers
both
religious human
refuse
begins
express
of
contribute true the
also as
that
or
The
our
and
if to
today.
But
One
within
from
We
Friends
and
these
terms
Christ
that knowledge
2
be
“Christ
the strange
with
they nature.
interdependent about
Both
two
Gatholicity
to
experience
must
a
approach the
Damascus,
of
HUGH
universal
these
name
meeting approaches
are say
themselves,
and
revelation, to
do
is
Christ
discoveries.
unhappy
these
the relationships
is
afFirm
the to
“Christ
not two
Or
scientists.
made of
of
Truth,”
be
relation
life
starts second, outlooks,
Christian and
Christ
with
forms truth, simply
with
S.
or
truth
both
of
and
among he
the
were
is
between
BARBOUR
clearer. inward
and
the
with other
experienced
men Truth’’
shows First,
of
comes
Friends
approaches for of
other
Almost
all with
reflect
unbiblical
our
Spirit
inclusive
basic
to
the
the
us.
inward
Christ,
of
Chris
truth,
when
many
other evan them
only,
basic
with
The
can
his
first any
the
ex all
of in
of covery
“Wholly might
of the Principle) for
that to “not
tive to meaning Thus herent and himself,
real:
and appropriate it
as or that inclusive, lie when and
also i.e., abstract of
at ophy THE
Schleiermacher
no
know
the or
well
existential) each
ultimately
this
philosophy
two
Both
experiences these
also
general
Non-Being. so
subjective,”
the
exists
The
we
“thing”
when KNOWLEDGE
we as call
his of
ontological
relationship on.
as point
of
deeper whenever
reality
Other” cannot well meaning absolute.
when
of
his
talk
are
has ability
“reality’’
acts
coherent,
awareness us for
Other whenever
we symbols
or
statements
we
“things” as
relationship
in
religious been
a
philosophy. try
of
effective. or we
describe
have
which
assumptions,
answer for
(and
bold
themselves has
can
not
of
and
experience,
schools
in
Something of statements
Instead,
discuss argument we OF
used
religion. and
men
with,
and
and
various
grasp
“laws”
underlain
willed
of
turned
we
to plunge
assume
Buber.
which almost TRUTH
experience.
drawn
adequately,
as
even the
distinguish
‘‘relationship,”
ideas.
assume to appropriate This
of
how
or of or
Something logical the
religious
in or know philosophers
ways
“ground
Truth share
for
away
all
prove,
respond
is into
unprovabie
“absolute
we involvement a encounter,
starting
leads
from
Other
science,
a
3 controlled.
man’s
also
men
God’s
man
significance
can
to
schools
truth
metaph)sics.
the
from
has
though
In
seem
us it interpret
science
experiences.
implied share.
men
of speak
way.
can
is
to character
point response from
and
to
the
existence.
many
dependence”
is
though
implied
Being”
discussing
his
participation,
to
ask
try
but
(semantic,
know
Some
as would
a
same
in,
of
we
Experience
or
about
correspond
illusion,
Behind
for
key
environment
for to
what different about man’s
aspects,
cause, important,
experience
a
talk
as
of
analyze
the
way, anything
outside
men terms
issue Modern
about
reality
“truths”
say
his
Man’s
“not-myself,” “truthful” Paul
makes
about
many truth
truthfulness,
a
both operational,
probability,
at
that man’s
would
demanding
upon
responses,
for
man’s
as referring
includes
to
a
anti
least truths
oneself Tillich
beyond
ability
schools
reality
forms reality at
for
philos iii — efforts those intui
Being these
about iii
dis
the
say
all. the
and
in
in
the
an
or
us —
are
not
NEEDED: since
seem
as
with
showing
Logos, stood daily
tory
vealed
ing logiaris
was
which
Christ,
gen,
see To
know prophets,
arable
whom doctrine.
up tue
and
source characters
affirming ing ute
was
ologians’
with
characters
for
experiences
Friends’
in
that
The
the
equate
The
of
to
bold universe, and
even
pointed
to
the
it
these
them.
work
nevertheless
the philosophy,
Christ
and
nature.
or
Christendom, to
nat
nature
was
from
be
were
same
the
meant
use
that
the
the
personality
early
doctrine;
5,
in
Logos
of
the
Word
of
world.
ure
and
abyss
inescapable
wider
Logos
OU.IKER
and
the
a
God,
nature)
God,
of
own
thought-patterns
relationships
Jesus
almost prophets,
to
the
Otherwise
the
bold
as
now
This
was church
which
“Father” or
of
that
of that Logos
of
by
thought
the
the
was
saying
was
thinking
but doctrine
mathematical,
experiences
Spirit truth
and
it
Being,
The
God.
of step.
created:
known
Christians
is
is
Logos
Christ
entirely
is
co-eternal
the
we
Christians
thus
how
the
most
LOGOS-DOCTRINE”
God
made
still
in
with
for
necessary
and
that
and
of
but
greatest
need
“God
Christian
no
cannot
Spirit
When
human
Logos,
misleading.
is
the
science,
were Christ
between
of
challenging:
and in
was
God of
himself
“Son”
not
fully
the
a
this
way
in
with
self-revealing
a
the
by
in
bridge
and
atoms
as
us
co-equal.
embodied
Quaker
the
perhaps
of
Son,
as of
taken
Jus
is
as achievements
revealed
himself,”
secondary
for
astonishingly
which be
Word
experience
for
the
would Trinity
the
the
God.
he
not
thought-patterns
the
Christ
life
personality
Hebrew-Christian
is
permeated
Christians
and
of
the the
was
plan
makes
Creator
arts,
seriously,
the
to
Greek
Greece
was
re-statement
this
the
cannot
They
for
Creator
the call
These
actual
a
The
be
God
galaxies,
in
to
and
himself
basis
and
and
separate
himself
Logos
what
kind
aIo
confused
rise
ultimate God
in
of
were
term
the
early
could
of
complex
and
of
to
daily
by
the
the
seem
word
be
divine
as
and
person
of
salvation.
the
the
by
we
the
law
Jesus.
come
talking
remains
known church,
faith
it
Trinity,
issue. for
while spoke
Rome
the
unified,
be
idea
about
of
the its
mystery.
with
life,
can
unknown,
was
message
in
early
of
sacred
of
the
fully
nature
the
of
order
to any
Logos,
To
order
in
about
God
contrib
The
by
we
as
Jesus,
in nature,
(in
of
by
Christ.
under
was
order
terms
insep
truth
Logos
God.
theo
united
well
clear
case
insist
But
and
On
Jesus
his
still
This
the
the
the we
re
by
not
the
the
in
th
of
in
I
new,
with sciences.
inspired
be
but
form
ings new
Truth
doctrine
by Light
was
their active
that sponse
actively
truth Trinity
neighbor,
theologians
theology.
creatively of
idea
inward
Christ
the phases.
to
themselves
self-evident
truthfulness,
the
Christ
was
man’s
Because
same
countries, Secondly,
been
because
of
‘rhe
4:6-12). of
consciences
of
like
is
God,
Spirit. through
is
is
truth
were The
the
Have sanctification
the
not
to
word
is
of
more
told
The
dynamic
Quaker
Truthfulness
way,
or
into
and
a
true
often
obey
differs
and
the
Spirit,
this
will
early
smoky
essential.
first
oneself
the
you
quite
you as
Friends
Hebrew
as
when Consistency much
their
They important
Friends
to
way
the
more
personal
true
were
pervaded
from
same God’s
nature,
of elusive.
that
is
not
self-evident
assertion
Friends
truth.
and
from
impersonal).
or
streets’ lantern.
the
God,
to
specific
with
response
current
their
too
than
known?
the
human
all
is
have
God
with
prophets know
stress
ethical
will
Yet
mean
is
more
the
beginning?
men
early
nature
had
to
was
inward
knew
Thus
When awareness
by
a
hearers
of
that
emphasized
of
was
Friends
message
Friends
code
as
the
Have
ancient
thought
God. on
But
his
and
is by
such
could
called
objective:
a
(Amos vital
rather
5
Friends
the
men
truth
ever-active:
drawn
had
the
inwardness,
of
town,
Bible,
personal
‘‘truth’’
of
openness.
for
If
you
often
The
Quaker
faced
messages
reality
way
truths
than
felt than
reality
know
living
was
— know
similarly
Logos
God’s
better
in
as
than
3:3-8,
not
LORD
or
from
more
the
was
assumed
the
psychology,
distorted,
to
that
given
they
reality
an is
historic
“published
spirit,
heard?
God.
or
truth
(the
presence
know
intellectual. is
facing
pioneers
word the
will
or
theology
and
naturally
with
in
is
John’s
inward
than
creed.
truth,
undergirded
assumed proclaimed
.
worse,
on
our
Christ “persons’’
.
with
of
man’s
Has
as They
,
that
compare
him.
previous
both
atonement.
have
obscuring
each of
the
God,
Christ
relation
gospel:
This
biology,
even
of
relationship
it
in
God,
Truth”
open
Crea
“preached
of
it
expected,
admitted
it
truest
not
old
the
occasion the
Because
two
Quaker
We
history;
Quaker
was
in
would
within
of
God’s
by
7:1-6
lead
it
early one’s
con
risen
and
both
and
the
the
em
the
try
re
fits
an
in
in In JESUS
proved.
fully we our like or out
of Quaker the
Fox truth, of
power the Christ. grace awake render we grace
which good? ence. help When timate that ter, love
Christian
Christ’s other
avoid
are
Inward escaping
That
inward Lewis natute
himself what For King. to.ey
ye
Behold
of Jesus
have
CHRIST
us
to
comes
becomes
No
has
of
to
the
speaking But no
reality our
of
Christology,
I
Baillie others.
Wilmet-
insights
me
to
being
am
Jesus
God
truth
must
Benson [Therefore]
one
bothered was
death
a
know
“rich as brought I
Christ
Light
‘‘moments
the
be
found
labels
by the
like
will
a
completely
AND creatures
is
so
makes becomes
itself
useful
enslaved analogy
Christ I truthful:
LORD, speaks makes
wholeness
it?
good of
do
young So in
Cooper still
Paul
aware
do
of
and
as
who
for
it OUR
the
history
a (Isaiah
most
also us
like
Christ
grace
a
...?“
hard
remember
new
more
that
but Canby
of their Your Tillich clue, given
should
us
there
scientist hack
wah
of
of ruler”
from
itself
TRUTHFULNESS a
their
by
humble and Christians
truth”
Saint
thing;
more
4O:l,28,3I
God man
history.
the
life
to
incarnate.
of
needed
Holy
in
Greek
direct
the
Jesus
for
that
fact,
to of
Jones
Donald show
Chris
own,
truth
reality goodness
every be
to
came
ye
itself
alone” who
now
Francis,
or
the truthful. One, the mete the
6
rellecting
the
the not
Christ but
human
replied,
encounter
and
the
to ;
why witness
as
since
Downing Is it LORI) paradox
width man’s for
is
45:15,18,19) to into
the
abstract
Baillie’s the
explains center givenness be
other
shall
merely
this
completely So man
(Mark
transcendental? Jesus,
of
creator
the
us.
Gandhi,
consciously
is
Jesus’
former
a Humility
truthfulness
life
our
God
“Why
spring shall conscience.
enough
and to
source
innately
seeking
Friends
universal
of
of
with This
the their have
idea saying
book, 10:18).
of
setting
to
why
day,
that
truth
of
grace.
depth things,
renew
Israel, forth;
convenient do
and the
and
God.
of of history,
is
meeting spoken
to
before
moral
some
he surely re,gard
God
linked
you
“Good
the
so historicity,
power
atonement
cannot
This
say? in
grace
their
shall
your reverently
of
others
before
could
The
whether
Friends
time
George
call way
Was
reality.
people
obedi
means
God’s with help
verse, early
with
with
Can
mas
and
and sur
use
not be
me
iii we —
in
to
r
vague or catholicity A a
life tive by and
guages. Christians. K’ang basic
tawney measure, OUTCOMES:
understand see
in that “full
Sikh;
friend
even
non-Christians
relation
under
any The
comparison the
Many peace, ft-nm light,
doth into the- is him oil the made
is ruler, being heaen Quakers, For we J’rinces,
as of ideas,
Hsi,
making the
anti
into flesh. The Indians”
evil
light
the phrase other
Friends: grace
of do.
and
in
religious
the the
of
let
unrighteousness,
you about
lost, the
trite
God the and
to Fox’s
implications
and
mine
the
the
actions
every
(;od,
from fellow-student
had
QUAKER
them
iii vott
world, early its
which
[he] by
Emperor
sea itself
Christ.
Thus
receive .
Creator,
goodness.
and light
unity
spirit whose
earth;
scholar
.
There was G. as
leadership.
truth see
of
the
it .
insists letter
and
however
would
in
“college
and
yet
nianifest:
Quakers character Jesus
as F.:
which the
truth.” which
ever
your
Buddhist
they with
and l’cople picked
Christ,
our hands
and
of
is UNJVERSALISM God
experiencing
deeds -md
is To and to
story
Emperor: to
a
ha’e Christ
that
and
rampant China cOme
in
evil
reached
is Thereby
own God [he]
Power
cloth the
are
lives, accept
placed
the
is
former,
meeting” limited of
at and
Christ you the you
carried
up
this
all
the of
he
thoughts,
of
Some
God
Sultan
actual Harvard bath
and
gathered
enlighten
day. Emperor
and
from
and who this
light,
run above
7
receive
to
responses
by
his
is breath
man is
men
the
among
Peking,
in
and one know
enlightened simultaneously he
is by
that
into
is
his
Teresina
Quaker their
Wider
the “Experiments
for
England,
Gandhi
all
this
knowers draw’s God,
in of
son
the and
climates, as
becomes
righteottsness,
with
together
and maker
who every
subordinate
which
him Powers,
God
the
of
same
themselves
Turkey,
God
of Friends
message understanding
.
natighty
to
might life .
China, another.
If
garden. Seekers
put
God:
Quakers .
man is
experiences.e
of in
regarded truth
yott
who brings
1-lavens of
you
of
of
the
and
light, world
for cultures,
English
all
the on
all
md
that
withal, now
tm
of
have
receive
waters,
words,
is
as
to
Kings
a
this
and expressing
with
has things
his us mankind,
you Bitt, spirits
real, to
an
some and
Quaker th
to
“blacks
cometh
well
and
may
this in
Power
(ailed
its
Over- the his
come
freshman serve interested
afl(I,
been
into
that
and
this
this
and this and
Truth,”
and
we of
a
in of
circles.
fringe, is
whole
reality
Word,
be
sensi
as
Such
truth
must
and
iii
felt and
lan
his
as
to
a
1 Such
Quakers3 enrollment Fowler rejected sense, several search
alertness fulness
and ward when can since we
truth role ings knees Christ, ley specific
philosopher contagious. watch bert has irea even psycho-analysis experience; therapy Light Friends
of
have what
says
We take
drive been
Quaker are of people
Outlet
of
they by truth
in
though
they
before
which
for
a
in
or has
is
early
truths new
and that the equally
ourselves, failed
himself,
any the
they to
tree —
hold
our the
come that
these truth many
blank:
men approach
and
human
discussed
may
and
the
established experience understanding
or psychiatry.
form
shows a catholicity It
a
Quakerism.
together. actually center
they
day
must of
massively
true
true fact,
for
have is a
and from
psycho-therapist men true.
grope
David
may
as people,
the
Religious
which
Zen
a
or
themselves moreover,
situations,
Christ
a
fulfilling
scientist
women be waste of like
self-knowledge
specific
man
been God,
place.
the and
seem remarkable
were,
master,
But for
truth,
Roberts.4
received
of
has truths
penetrate
to
a
The
who,
“refugee
within,
a evil”
women of
little not
compared the
Christ,
go
disproved
outside
in preference, who
long
must
been
This
a answers.
cheat
no
seem
even
think
main
out
the even
from Light
Christian
in of
could
by
8
come
child
one’s
can
time,
we
hunger
The
be piety into Light does rather and fundamentalism strong their
in to
psychology”
us Christ
Christianity,
doctrines
can
they
if
our
be may
was
us by willing
principle.
be
by
to
with —
time and
we
greet
special
Yet
unlimited ‘Quaker,
not
and
seen,
be honesty, “tender” own
Quakerism of
lack ministry. theologians as
the
than
their
recover and mainly enough
if
say
the
Christ.
harrowing we
independent
mean
inwardly
to
sham,
such we
kneeling
of faith.
to
by
faith.
witness
respect nothing, our
sit
integrity
emotional each
of
Christianity are
go
namely,
his
if
In
a humility, people. the in
that
with search
to
experience and
some
any.”
down or self-discovery Among
after
To
not
practice, T.
the
must
patient
As
such
accept missionary
a
of
for
posture
an
Judaism. all
can
a
H.
face
or religious
of
open Friends
Quaker
respect,
having
Friends
Albert psycho liberal
for
Hindu
experi on
recoil
teach truth know
as
If
their
Hux if
turn
early
and
“the
and one and
we in
his
Al
we all
to of
is
friends, we the than ideas. warns lated our
‘or ratelv, All
by meaning have accepted
Wpiied Protestantism there TRUTH the
them
experience of
cnce
have
the Westmorland asks
facts
truth
flesh
natural
But
Friends
to
Life
man demned. and the opened, as and sometimes and had as the swept judged But is was it
as
his
or
Secret Truth
he
rather what
was soon
also
this to
part
IN
and
indignation
that
and
the as
can ssay
pain
of made to was
Was the eser
there all
East
true
ask
away,
ol
THE
before
world,
God’s
the ignore
even and
as
“God’s
could truth
was and people
it of Mine
affirmation made. captise be
to brought
blood.”
of
Police, the
tlone.
responds
ourselves, to
than
I manifest,
was
German
means to
gift
A
Christ, heard weighed trusted
and
been
laid a
LIGHT
all was
our
to
Lord
ideas
eyes
Light
Christian
thunder Fox
itself, modern
ll
one trust of and
And
honest.
of
the
truth.’’ caine involved
things all
down .
in,
he already
culture.
the
It one
that
to
content
tell
were
the .
I
for
or
my only, caine
to
illusive — the so
students and The
through
what is OF
the
speak believed
agrees, shows
Lord,
as that
lorth
declare
other. this upon peace
loving I
I were in
and
the
more
righteousness
dim
psychiatric But
However Puritans
CHRIST
had
was
found well Light,
Ark
in
sorrow because
a
in
there:
kind
was
something
“Christ
out lightning, actual
the
to
Separatist
The
me,
came world brought with
9
it. East
Johannes
death overthrown,
ever
it. it the
important In of
that
Cod,
as
accept
the
too
of
truth
is
“Face of .
however
the
when a Light
crying
Greeks to
(tone .
its Germany,6
of
painful
reality better
powerful the
and present
act of
contribution
light. .
-nd “lying
and
is who be
to patient.
Testament
fear .
the
[within]
impact
there. inner
of prison, the
Christ
and made, was . to
leader
judgrnent.5
remembrance Truth”
Hamel
then unrighteousness
and .
was and to
Christ
theological; had
face
to And
is
painful, and
Day
has judged
it
what
situation,
experience. be
always When
and the
.nd
little
be
my
seems,
known
terror,
and
a on rejoiced,
of
and
affirmed
with the
immediately, Frar1cis
was of
become simultaneously
in
true
Lutheran
foundation
loyal
so
of
deep eyes kind as
changes
and the
us.
men
the
dreadful
book,
opened,
Eternal
truth because
questioned free-church
more
I
each
sorrow
that
it
to
in
Lord were
bore
con
new with
Quakers
of to
religious was
was
is
Friends
Howgiil
people
almost
Christ.
this
Truth
I
trans
word
man,
one’s to
sepa
than
pas
the
for
be
of
H certain is
“the
truthfulness by knows. to
0
about more ence inwardly tered
to
is
Christ do Quaker ways heart, authority. c’stanhism through
IJTCOMES:
demanded
it
admitting
a
speak
not
But
Our
way The
serves itself \rhat Truth without Wherever
takes It has ically, Protestasit to from making Our “truly,’’
truth
truthfulness
insisted than
the
times
are
means
comes live
begin
And
thought
this that
itself
objectively the
to
known concern
uneasiness need
place can
sin,
centrality
I
truth, from .
is
is
also
otherwise
loyalty
may ourselves .
Catholic
spoken
mask know,
of QUAKER
we to
one’s .
with thus
witness .
awareness tim
only
death
is
the
there, that macic
not through
about .
of
us,
God,
say
sacramentally
recognize .
doctrine. or
meaningless
be
it. is
the as and
to
inward true
to
this, be
believe, springs
misleading.8
directly
gives ignorance,
to
and the
even whether
best
the equidistant
deny than truth
us
these of
who
love,
but
of as
same
revealed
of
daily
covering
EXCLUSIVENESS people.
God
what
stress Christ.
judges
the crucial
the
Christ’s Friends
room
of
ourselves
served
the
as bitter
from
has this
praise
men;
suppose,
encounter
only thing
is
in
devil life, places The
the we
a
sacraments,
it
church
had love.’’ in
living integrity
and for
man for before
reiat:on
or
Inwardness
there sanctified,
The means
speak
the and
or partly
by truth.
total
as
the
in
from
mercy with 10
Roman as
Truth.
mercy dividers
by nien
Pastor
think,
who
silence, saving my
God
church.
the worship
sinners
they meeting
God inwardness
Responsible
To
in
explaining
for to
to
situation,
both Thus
Pastor from
knowledge before
about
has AND
to
outward
on
except
practically
the its
speak
lie stand,
feel
real
and of
But
Hamel
Catholic
but
him.’’
before encounter
been
us him
by also
apostolic
good
of
is The men
Catholichm
our
or
in PROTESTANTISM
not
him,
ideas
knowledge
in
the
Hamel’s
simple just
already
God grace
to
to
want,
differing freed
of makes
from so
God being
This of
caretul!y Jesus about
world
effort more.
love without and
truth
a those there as
Quaker
with and
church as
the
It
and they and
lesse”
evil. by
teaching
of perhaps
aiiirttiation,
defined. theoret
Christ,7
is means
t
frees
us less
Truth
means
us
Christ-cesi truth.
to
and statements
truth
Jesus man.
a who
men
stop
and
of
settings, are,
respolkt
salvation
the
lie
all describe
hesitate
Christ:
intense
experi
has
extent Christ
in
us
that
have
Prot
one with
and
at the
a[
Light
preaching, salvation, it Bible, inward Bible Canby raments home Petto, make,th Biblereading in sermon Luther without and ward arate particular on mystics
widesp ers
are richly estant complex. the awareness bu Baptists tan ward
to
rejecting
early
had
children
inward
form But
the
Christ-mysticism the
a
constantly of
Bible,
inward
to
salvation.
sermon,
the
doctrine lived
mere
Jones
experience,
cad
and
combined.
use also
begun
Christ
were Quaker
a listen
they
price
Quakerism the
radical ol but
soule.” of
voyce
therefore,
The
of
the
that
power
the
and sacraments, witness
it: has of expected
Lutherans
inward
had
for
popery; knowledge
the
only for
historically or of
within:
of
need Calvinism
and Lord’s discovery conscious
It
doctrine
well
all
within,
preached,
Puritan,
its
sacrament,
making
written blended
the
Justification
is The of
in
as
and influences
fully were
own
of
presence
was
can
thus
shown,
other
God voice
well-written
God’s
table. the
these
and
newly-won
and
test
by
of
of and
accepted
of sake not word however
inward about
ministers at
as
best
several
to
preliminary was
of
words,
Christ
the
the Puritans
God’s
radical
this among
of outward preaching.
Friends
Word
does or
transform
But
thought God
by
11 was from
seen
in
in
inward
Inward
the
effectual
companionship.
point:
conversion. Faith,
traditions.
this
Calvinism
was its Friends sermons break more
worship
while forgiveness, and
Baptist,
at
as
Bible,
to
Puritans,
the
Catholics,
even
inspiration,
themselves
means
way
a
Oxford not of
reach
revelation.
turning most salvation
Christ and
men
Quakers.
direct,
form
through
he
“Ordinarily
application
as
though
“he
were
of
linked
were
John
of
read
it
altogether:
the made
early
witnessing,’’
morally.
Puritan
men
though
of
maketh Salvation
leans
Anabaptisis,
is
and which
continuous,
the
ultra-Protestant
of
refused
intellectualism
not the instrument the
often in Bunyan,
from
Even
necessarily It
they
Quaker
secondary through
men
Cambridge;
The
an to
invokes
letter. Scriptures.
basic
simply
as
of
Luther the
influences
the
read
the
reduced
the
Quakers
Quaker
the
English
church, is
it
to saving to
wrote Spirit
word
went
Puri Prot
itself
lead
to
out
sep
and and sac
the
the
the
As the
of
to
in
so
to
a
I were saw other
lish other Quakerism within limited regarded uset broke ether them.
Worid who slowly
THE church ings Councils eral tives, of
with churches.
of
all commitment likely
Jesus
us
Only themselves
churches.
Lake
In preatchinge, the Conference Itt inge. if that the non—Friends
thus with
had ‘Fhe
ECIUMENICAL
their issues
vital
nineteenth-century were
through
words
have
to
a Evangelical
broke.
in
is
the hopes
organizations.
lord
thinge
which
Christ
all generation.
of
deeper a
exclusire, inward
arise
discovery District still
prepared
the
heavy
Christians, slow in
inightie
twentieth
to
god,
Churches, he
other
shared
People
its
to of
support chat
rahed
first
seem ...gott these everywhere
Friends, in
But
but
& as
to
Friends
first
Christ a
experience
weight
knowledge on
to
such
churches
thinge,
or
is
God break sect
Alliance
MOVEMENT
150
to corn
even
prayers.1’
goe
that as in walls
theology-ridden
out
spoken,
years
limited
century,
the
It Yet
now or bring
this
upp; late
groups.
in
the
years forth
comes
once and into
againe
to of
down to Friends such in is
recognized
except
eighteenth-centur
Maryland
even as made
under Lutheran, the
claim:
be
as ironic
challenging &
relation as soe,
people
the
because
of in Savior.
of
of the
they
issues.
soc
unsavory,
in Friends in
quickly a
Councils’
that,
1847
the
Christ
thinge
God [rends,
after
12
Quakerism,
group
them
the apostasy,
for
only
knew
walke fire
in
that
have
to
resistance
for
These
workc
Friends
to that
purely to few.
settlements could
the
from
the
Quakers
Reformed, yee
foseph
expect yee
have
true
itt
than
[this]
to
in other
non-Quakers
the
shares
many
learned
sequence
basis:
backwaters group end is speake
many
must
the
of
and
irresponsible
The
inter-church
church. not
National save.
begun social
their
may
only
the
refused
of
Protestants.
of
England, to love
John
Friends.
a
as had
all formal shared
of:...
British opened rapid
sweep
individuals
nhinistery all
to
basic hurt
and
acustomary
they
of
own:
reformers William come
of Early
to
handle
preatch
accepted
Gurney
There god.”lO
like of
againe to
enter and
Evangelical
experiences
little growth acceptance
found kinship
the
But
now
into
and
they
the
conserva
isolation
its
join
councils,
Friends
of
Simeon
World
world
The
rapid- meet Penn
inter-
many were
Eng
with
Gen
who
from still
and
the
the
no
of
of
marided answer, proach,
ments, units’ sass Spirit.
since raments heart. 1piscopalians ing
to Spirit of
that Calvinists of
cussion, between the High institutions, necessity” vinced
bases dare called If churches.
cause the
inexplicable: fire
do
insist
Christ
the
Christ:
Just
Quaker the
But
the
need
no theological
An
all
usually
to
Anglicans,
still
of
of Christians
or
for
no The at sacrament
even
form
Presbyterian, that
hold a and
Greek at know ecumenical
churches,
the
the
is
the
of
of Quaker’s this
wrestle
formula,
turns
is
creeds
this
this
Yet
the
one,
is
all anti truly
necessary each creeds
focus presenting
if of
Quaker
disagree,
back,
Christian
shared
that
point
Christ’s
able
point Orthodox
purpose, Christians while
jargon, absurd
a
words
out
for
of Scripture.
are
and
particular about particular basic I
of
on
Gods
only
no feeling
all
to again.
think
group
instance,
to not
that
inward
such
“you
Baptism.
doctrine such
sacraments one
for
can witness and inner
intellectual
churches,
and
be also
unity
community:
Christ fruitful
the
with his
grace
there
he
salvation.
must
members
issue:
an
exclusive.
are itself
is bring
an
the If
Even
unchristian
feel
Christian people
work
should
Creed,
interpretation
experience
then
inter-church will
a
is
13 the
effectively inter-church
trying
of
risk
must give
to
is
Quaker
create After witness at
to
the
says
can
the
the
genuine
often
inward in
way need the
faced,
home.
concentrate
of
Vhca of go
one? up
Friends
Bible
be creeds,
discussion
to help a various
efforts
A
rejecting
institution.
world,
stalemate
our
home. such
out.
outward
Quaker,
member churchmanship make
argue is given
to
Friend
in
even that
A
group
Lutherans
or likely
salvation
Christian
we
relationship
look
group
of
Quaker
groups, are
each
Yet sacraments,
to
hinder ways.
Within
members
us
no
the
share.” despite
if
these
on
hack
build
may
are
means the
able
to
is together
finds each
all
becomes it
outward
various
faces
creeds, partisan
still
be
“Nonsense,” Baptists
was
still
Holy
Quakers
by may
the community
not that
and is to
such
to
church
Christian
it —
the
of
But
not
not will
the of
to not together
Christ’s
united,
inward has
witness
intend
not
church
feel,
Dutch
know
sacra
Spirit. at
this
forms
“non
a
total,
God.
form
other
con
sac
and
ap
the first de
dis
no
not
the
be at
is
as
is still
exclusiveness of
es, silence. Christ’s not menical circle limited soberly Trappists clusiveness. tian we ii
absolute unexpected our Yet alism universalism mand; self spective. and
he includes ‘Holy go equally
must Christ; ly we truths
Christendom
of
and
truthful
have not is
let
forward
can this Friends
lies call.
We movement
all
inclusive
and
able.
and
keep
us
so willing 1—listory’
power back cannot and union.
group
it Cliristiamis. be approach behind Then valid
met
cannot call
urging
in go.
far should We relativism,
Truth
and
led
moments
in us
As
as To have how
many turns
was to
Christ;
and
as
has
response with
cannot
The to approaches, recognition usually
he
continually
back be long to
many attempt
is
all
each
jump we Franciscans of
retire tied
also we
as
a somehow sink.
leads is out
accept of best broken
truth.
members other our
special
understand
as in So
to it
of
if may this its
man
up
Friends,u
keep
therefore
to
responds
our out
constant
comes
to we Christ seen
a us.
impasse, o
own. member
small Friends
with he
Friend
its a
men is
all How
be to down returns
do
own re-thinking be of us
been need
as corporate
Our what
own as
within of respond of
true
endlessly not
our to and our
steps
really inherent
Part
and
can a
our life tell such truthfulness it, danger 14 to
and cannot
can churches. at
by
affirmation us Noaiis
to
special
recognize he
basic
that human
to
to
it such
work
groups Christ and role
whether of of
respond
is our
Catholicism simply to
a
fused? seems directly is
new
our
rule
not grou.p
the our practical
open Christ
of as understand
witness escape true
all
within
an
Ark,
own
within
calling;
that sliding
truth, skins inward
and
meaning
only are men. own without So
God impasse
to
say,
can
to the for that
truthfully
and
are
to
efforts.
has
the of demand either.
Truth,
distorted, the
being that
the
into cooperation God
Lranscd Quaker “This a all himself
and “Callings”
still other
Christ into
leave feel the
not
experience Council
private
world
our
ecunienicaL men.
Christ by demanding
of
Gods as are
increasing
orders sure
and individu
exclusive An each
is Yet
church the own scientific
of in a
he
is beimind
witness
free where Chris
or
great
itSCi, me.’’ such
com goes ecu
truth him that
will rest our This finds
per
and
ex
are
an
or
of
of to
F
11. 12.
It).
9. 8.
7. 6. 5. 4.
3. 2.
1.
Moz’cncimt Ruth Centre, See 5. Press, George Spirit factually The Ibid., Harper pp. Scribner’s Francis
David Albert Johannes Albert Brothers,
pa Teresina General Truth, M.
George
Petto,
inpim
Percy
88
K.
fullest
Rouse
1911, pp. in
let.
Roberts,
Fox, and
Gandhi. 1942.
Outler, Fowler, Beacon
Howgill, and
Fox,
“The
Puritan
Conference, accurate, Havens,
Hamnel,
1954.
Sons,
91,
Bartlett,
S.P.C.K,
p.
97.
Journal,
recent
Brothers,
and
T’Vorks,
92,
321.
Voyce
Press Pychothcrapy
Two
Pssrhotherapy Autobiography: 1950.
Faith
Buddhist A Works,
Stephen
94,
is
Quakers Statement
Christian 1954,
ed., of
paperback.
in rrends
Vol. n.d.
95
1952,
and
the
Howard
London,
Norman REFERENCES
(slightly
in
Charles
IV,
and
Spirit,”
Experience,
pp.
and
the
in
in
of and
T. and
Quaker
15
Moderu
The
East
2-4,
pages
H.
the
this, Penney,
1676,
modified
Neill, Sowle,
the
from
a
Brinton,
Story
44.46,
Germany,
Chri&tian
Christian
Experiments
covering though
Christian
Basil
pp.
A
Geoffrey
Quaker
1706,
Vol.
of
from
History
57,
42-44.
Blackwel],
Friends
I,
My
carefully
pp.
Association
83-89,
Church,
1640-1840.
View
Cambridge Thought,
Message,
the
F.
with
207-298.
of
Nuttall,
Experiments
English
for
of
etc.
the
1946,
Truth,
Friends qualified
Man,
Harper
Pendle
Ecumenical
300
Press,
University
The
pp.
version).
Charles
Friends
Year.c,
Book
Holy
25
1960,
with
and
Hill
and
f.