A NOTE USING THIS GUIDE… Locator Keys Identify Sites on This Map, Heading NW from the Confluence of the Miami River and Biscay
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Initial Draft – for Discussion Purposes Only
Initial Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only Draft South Florida Canal Aquatic Life Study October 29, 2012 1 Initial Draft – For Discussion Purposes Only Draft South Florida Canal Aquatic Life Study Background and Introduction The Central & Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, which was authorized by Congress in 1948, has dramatically altered the waters of south Florida. The current C&SF Project includes 2600 miles of canals, over 1300 water control structures, and 64 pump stations1. The C&SF Project, which is operated by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), provides water supply, flood control, navigation, water management, and recreational benefits to south Florida. As a part of the C&SF, there are four major canals running from Lake Okeechobee to the lower east coast – the West Palm Beach Canal (42 miles long), Hillsboro Canal (51 miles), North New River Canal (58 miles) and Miami canal (85 miles). In addition, there are many more miles of primary, secondary and tertiary canals operated as a part of or in conjunction with the C&SF or as a part of other water management facilities within the SFWMD. Other entities operating associated canals include counties and special drainage districts. There is a great deal of diversity in the design, construction and operation of these canals. The hydrology of the canals is highly manipulated by a series of water control structures and levees that have altered the natural hydroperiods and flows of the South Florida watershed on regional to local scales. Freshwater and estuarine reaches of water bodies are delineated by coastal salinity structures operated by the SFWMD. -
Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1955
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 382 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PART 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R. Speer and A. B. Goodwin Washington, D. C., 1956 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS TO SEPTEMBER 30,1955 PAET 2. SOUTH ATLANTIC SLOPE AND EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO BASINS By P. R Speer and A. B. Goodwin EXPLANATION This index lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the South Atlantic slope and Eastern Gulf of Mexico basins for which records have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods prior to September 30, 1955. Periods of record for the same station published by other agencies are listed only when they contain more detailed information or are for periods not reported in publications of the Geological Survey. The stations are listed in the downstream order first adopted for use in the 1951 series of water-supply papers on surface-water supply of the United States. Starting at the headwater of each stream all stations are listed in a downstream direction. Tributary streams are indicated by indention and are inserted between main-stem stations in the order in which they enter the main stream. To indicate the rank of any tributary on which a record is available and the stream to which it is immediately tributary, each indention in the listing of stations represents one rank. -
Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military -
Ttt-2-Map.Pdf
BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 <Double-click here to enter title> «¬89 4 2 ESCAMBIA «¬ «¬189 85 «¬ «¬ HOLMES 97 SANTA ROSA ¬« 29 331187 83 610001 ¤£ ¤£«¬ «¬ 81 87 570006 «¬ «¬ 520076 TTT-2 10 ¦¨§ ¤£90 «¬79 Pensacola Inset OKALOOSA Pensacola/ «¬285 WALTON «¬77 West Panhandle 293 WASHINGTON «¬87 570055 ¦¨§ ONLY STATE OWNED 20 ¤£98 «¬ BRIDGES SHOWN BAY 570082 460051 600108 LEGEND 460020 Route with «¬30 Restricted Bridge(s) 368 Route without 460113 «¬ Restricted Bridge(s) 460112 Non-State Maintained Road 460019 ######Restricted Bridge Number 0 12.5 25 50 Miles ¥ Page 1 of 16 BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 <Double-click here to enter title> «¬2 HOLMES JACKSON 610001 71 530005 520076 «¬ «¬69 TTT-2 ¬79 « ¤£90 Panama City/ «¬77 ¦¨§10 GADSDEN ¤£27 WASHINGTON JEFFERSON Tallahassee 500092 ¤£19 ONLY STATE OWNED ¬20 BRIDGES SHOWN BAY « CALHOUN 460051 «¬71 «¬65 Tallahassee Inset «¬267 231 73 LEGEND ¤£ «¬ LEON 59 «¬ Route with Restricted Bridge(s) 460020 LIBERTY 368 «¬ Route without WAKULLA 61 «¬22 «¬ Restricted Bridge(s) 98 460112 ¤£ Non-State 460113 Maintained Road 460019 GULF TA ###### Restricted Bridge Number 98 FRANKLIN ¤£ 490018 ¤£319 «¬300 490031 0 12.5 25 50 Miles ¥ Page 2 of 16 BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS - MARCH 2019 350030 <Double-click320017 here to enter title> JEFFERSON «¬53 «¬145 ¤£90 «¬2 «¬6 HAMILTON COLUMBIA ¦¨§10 290030 «¬59 ¤£441 19 MADISON BAKER ¤£ 370013 TTT-2 221 ¤£ SUWANNEE ¤£98 ¤£27 «¬247 Lake City TAYLOR UNION 129 121 47 «¬ ¤£ ¬ 238 ONLY STATE OWNED « «¬ 231 LAFAYETTE «¬ ¤£27A BRIDGES SHOWN «¬100 BRADFORD LEGEND 235 «¬ Route with -
Everglades National Park and the Seminole Problem
EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK 21 7 Invaders and Swamps Large numbers of Americans began migrating into south Florida during the late nineteenth century after railroads had cut through the forests and wetlands below Lake Okeechobee. By the 1880s engineers and land developers began promoting drainage projects, convinced that technology could transform this water-sogged country into land suitable for agriculture. At the turn of the cen- EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND THE tury, steam shovels and dredges hissed and wheezed their way into the Ever- glades, bent on draining the Southeast's last wilderness. They were the latest of SEMlNOLE PROBLEM many intruders. Although Spanish explorers had arrived on the Florida coast early in the sixteenth century, Spain's imperial toehold never grew beyond a few fragile It seems we can't do anything but harm to those people even outposts. Inland remained mysterious, a cartographic void, El Laguno del Es- when we try to help them. pirito Santo. Following Spain, the British too had little success colonizing the -Old Man Temple, Key Largo, 1948 interior. After several centuries, all that Europeans had established were a few scattered coastal forts. Nonetheless, Europe's hand fell heavily through disease and warfare upon the aboriginal Xmucuan, Apalachee, and Calusa people. By 1700 the peninsula's interior and both coasts were almost devoid of Indians. Swollen by tropical rains and overflowing every summer for millennia, Lake The vacuum did not last long. Creeks from Georgia and Alabama soon Filtered Okeechobee releases a sheet of water that drains south over grass-covered marl into Florida's panhandle and beyond, occupying native hunting grounds. -
Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview
TOTAL AREA: 60,238 SQ.FT. Wynwood Development Table of Contents 03 Project Overview 15 Conceptual Drawings 17 Location 20 Demographics 23 Site Plan 26 Building Efficiency 29 RelatedISG Project Overview Project This featured property is centrally located in one of Miami’s hottest and trendiest neighborhood, Wynwood. The 60,238 SF site offers the unique possibility to develop one of South Florida’s most ground-breaking projects. There has only been a select amount of land deals in the past few years available in this neighborhood, and it is not common to find anything over 20,000 SF on average. With its desirable size and mixed use zoning, one can develop over 300 units with a retail component. Wynwood has experienced some of the highest rental rates of any area of South Florida, exceeding $3 per SF, and retail rates exceeding $100 SF. As the area continues to grow and evolve into a world renowned destination, it is forecasted that both residential and retail rental rates will keep increasing. Major landmark projects such as the Florida Brightline and Society Wynwood, as well as major groups such as Goldman Sachs, Zafra Bank, Thor Equity and Related Group investing here, it is positioned to keep growing at an unprecedented rate. Name Wynwood Development Style Development Site Location Edgewater - Miami 51 NE 22th Street Miami, FL 33137 Total Size 60,238 SQ. FT. (1.3829 ACRES) Lot A 50 NE 23nd STREET Folio # 01-3125-015-0140 Lot B 60 NE 23nd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0330 Lot C 68 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0320 Lot D 76 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-011-0310 Lot E 49 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0140 Lot F 51 NE 23rd STREET Folio 01-3125-015-0130 Zoning T6-8-O URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONE 04 Development Regulations And Area Requirements DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION VALUE CODE SECTION REQUIRED PERMITTED PROVIDED CATEGORY RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL LODGING RESIDENTIAL LODGING PERMITTED GENERAL COMMERCIAL PERMITTED LOT AREA / DENSITY MIN.5,000 SF LOT AREA MAX. -
Metromover Fleet Management Plan
Miami-Dade Transit Metromover Fleet Management Plan _______________________________________________________ _________________________________________________ Roosevelt Bradley Director June 2003 Revision III Mission Statement “To meet the needs of the public for the highest quality transit service: safe, reliable, efficient and courteous.” ________________________________________________________________ Metromover Fleet Management Plan June 2003 Revision III MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT METROMOVER FLEET MANAGEMENT PLAN June 2003 This document is a statement of the processes and practices by which Miami- Dade Transit (MDT) establishes current and projected Metromover revenue- vehicle fleet size requirements and operating spare ratio. It serves as an update of the October 2000 Fleet Management Plan and includes a description of the system, planned revenue service, projected growth of the system, and an assessment of vehicle maintenance current and future needs. Revisions of the October 2000 Fleet Management Plan contained in the current plan include: • Use of 2-car trains as a service improvement to address overcrowding during peak periods • Implementation of a rotation program to normalize vehicle mileage within the fleet • Plans to complete a mid-life modernization of the vehicle fleet Metromover’s processes and practices, as outlined in this plan, comply not only with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Circular 9030.1B, Chapter V, Section 15 entitled, “Fixed Guideway Rolling Stock,” but also with supplemental information received from FTA. This plan is a living document based on current realities and assumptions and is, therefore, subject to future revision. The plan is updated on a regular basis to assist in the planning and operation of Metromover. The Fleet Management Plan is structured to present the demand for service and methodology for analysis of that demand in Section Two. -
Transportation System Hurricane Emergency Preparedness Study
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM HURRICANE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STUDY Dade County. Metropolitan Planning Orga,,-ization Dade County Office of Emergency Management Post, Buckley, Scltult & Jernigan, 'nc. rite Gotltard Group, 'nc. HerIJert Saffir Consulting Engineers Marlin Engineering, 'nc. Io APPENDIX 2B EXAMPLE DETAILED ANALYSIS Prepared for: DADE COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION and . DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. In Association With: MARLIN ENGINEERING, INC. HERBERT S. SAFFIR, CONSULTING ENGINEERS THE GOTHARD GROUP, INC. JULY 1995 INTRODUCTION The Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) undertook a study to review, and where appropriate, enhance hurricane emergency preparedness planning directed at the Dade County transportation system. The firm of Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan was retained by the MPO to lead the consulting team conducting the study, which was financed by US DOT Planning Emergency Relief (PLER) funds administered through the MPO. Project work was closely coordinated with the Dade County Office of Emergency Management (OEM), and integrated input from transportation planning, operating, and supporting agencies at local state and federal levels, as well as incorporating recently ~pdated information -from the South Florida Water Management District and the National Hurricane Center. The objectives of the study were to systematically identify principal physical, functional, and personnel resources within the transportation system to evaluate the system's ability and readiness to deal with hurricane events, and to review and assess procedures associated with transportation system hurricane preparedness and response. Principal tasks of the study were: 1. Inventory the transportation system components and pertinent features of the transportation system, and key human resources that are relevant to hurricane preparedness and response; 2. -
Miami-Dade Transit Rail & Mover Rehabilitation Phase II
Miami-Dade Transit Rail & Mover Rehabilitation Phase II – Metromover & Operational Review Final Report This research was conducted pursuant to an interlocal agreement between Miami-Dade Transit and the Center for Urban Transportation Research The report was prepared by: Janet L. Davis Stephen L. Reich Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida, College of Engineering 4202 E. Fowler Ave., CUT 100 Tampa, FL 33620-5375 April 10, 2002 Rail & Mover Rehabilitation Report Phase II – Metromover ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project team from the Center for Urban Transportation Research included Janet L. Davis and Stephen L. Reich. The team worked closely with a Mover Rehabilitation Task Force made up of Agency Rail Division personnel including Hannie Woodson (Chair), Danny Wilson, George Pardee, William Truss, Gregory Robinson, Bud Butcher, Colleen Julius, Sylvester Johnson, and Cathy Lewis. A special acknowledgment of the Rail Maintenance Control Division is made for their significant assistance in assembling much of the data required. Page 2 of 146 Rail & Mover Rehabilitation Report Phase II – Metromover EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The work was intended to assist Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) in documenting its rail rehabilitation needs and develop a plan to address those needs. The assessment included a review of the current condition of the Metrorail and Metromover systems, a comparison with other transit properties’ heavy rail and people mover systems, and a recommended plan of action to carry the Agency forward into the next five years. Special detail was devoted to the provisions of the labor agreements of the comparable transit properties as they related to contracting for outside services and the recruitment, selection and advancement of employees. -
Miami DDA Master Plan
DOWNTOWN MIAMI DWNTWN MIAMI... Epicenter of the Americas 2025 Downtown Miami Master Plan 9 200 ber Octo TABLE OF CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION 05 About the Downtown Development Authority 06 Master Plan Overview 06 Foundation 06 Districts 08 Principles 09 Considerations 09 Acknowledgements 10 How to Use this Document 12 VISION 13 Vision Statement 14 GOALS 15 1. Enhance our Position as the Business and 19 Cultural Epicenter of the Americas 2. Leverage our Beautiful and Iconic Tropical Waterfront 27 3. Elevate our Grand Boulevards to Prominence 37 4. Create Great Streets and Community Spaces 45 5. Promote Transit and Regional Connectivity 53 IMPLEMENTATION 61 Process 62 Matrix 63 CONCLUSION 69 APPENDIX 71 Burle Marx Streetscape Miami DDA DOWNTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN 2025 2025 DOWNTOWN MIAMI... EPICENTER OF THE AMERICAS 2 3 INTRODUCTION About the DDA Master Plan Overview Foundation Districts Principles Considerations Acknowledgements How to Use the Document DOWNTOWN MIAMI MASTER PLAN 2025 4 Introduction Introduction ABOUT THE DDA FOUNDATION “Roadmap to Success” Downtown Master Plan Study Miami 21 (Duany Plater-Zyberk): 2009 A Greenprint for Our Future: The Miami-Dade Street CRA Master Plans (Dover Kohl / Zyscovich): (Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce (GMCoC), Tree Master Plan (Miami-Dade County Community 2004 / 2006 Miami 21’s mission is to overhaul the City of Miami’s The Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) is The Master Plan stands on a foundation of various New World Center (NWC) Committee): 2009 Image Advisory Board): 2007 a quasi-independent -
Miami Office Market Report
FIRST QUARTER 2018 MIAMI OFFICE MARKET REPORT Licensed Real Estate Broker BLANCA COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE | 1ST QUARTER 2018 MARKET REPORT | PAGE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DOWNTOWN | BRICKELL | CORAL GABLES | MIAMI AIRPORT As of first quarter 2018, favorable local and national economic Class A product remains robust. Highly populated suburban markets conditions, coupled with Miami’s continued global appeal, helped with abundant amenities and single-digit vacancies, such as Aventura sustain the success of Miami’s vibrant office market. The latest and Coconut Grove, have more than 350,000 square feet of office data demonstrate the continued decline of Miami-Dade County’s space delivering in the next 18 to 24 months The evolution of new unemployment rate (currently at 4.7%) with more than 30,000 jobs office submarkets like Wynwood, with its growing residential and added over the past year. The county also recorded 4.5% GDP vibrant amenity base, now able to offer Class A office product, poised growth, signaling a positive outlook for companies with an established to attract a new wave of companies looking to establish their offices in presence in Miami. Year-over-year, robust leasing activity and steady a creative and culturally driven office market. increase in rents evidence the demand for premium Class A office space, a trend we can expect to continue this year. With the first quarter showing local economic stability, a significant number of tenants (more than 900,000 square feet) in the market, and Year-over-year, the Miami Class A office market closed more than 1.8 limited new supply, we expect solid performance in the office sector million square feet of office lease transactions, and is outperforming this year. -
Allapattah Development Site Exclusively Listed
Allapattah Development Site Miami, FL 33142 0.7 Acre Parcel Rendering of 102 Units Shown Deme Mekras Elliot Shainberg CEO, Managing Partner Managing Partner Exclusively Listed By: Direct: 786.671.0149 Direct: 786.671.0151 [email protected] [email protected] Allapattah Development Site | 2137 NW 36th Street Table of Contents Confidentiality Disclaimer Property Description................................................................................ 3 This is a confidential Offering Memorandum intended solely for your limited use and benefit in de-termining whether you desire to express further interest into the acquisition of the Subject Property. This Offering Memorandum contains selected information pertaining to the Property Financial Analysis.................................................................................... 17 and does not purport to be a representation of state of affairs of the Owner or the Property, to be all-inclusive or to contain all or part of the information which prospective investors may Land Sales Comparables......................................................................... 21 require to evaluate a pur-chase of real property. All financial projections and information are provided for general reference purposes only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, market conditions, competition, and other factors beyond the control of Rent Comparables................................................................................... 25 the Owner or MSP Group ,LLC. Therefore, all projections,