DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadband Stimulus Program Funds Fiber

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadband Stimulus Program Funds Fiber BroadbandBroadband StimulusStimulus ProgramProgram FundsFunds FiberFiber The final broadband stimulus awards were announced just ahead of the statutory deadline. Lots of new and interesting fiber builds are in the works. By Masha Zager ■ Broadband Properties he two federal agencies responsible for disbursing institutional networks; though few NTIA projects will con- broadband stimulus funds have now completed their nect homes or businesses with broadband in the short run, Tawards, and awardees are starting to plan and build they should make bandwidth more affordable in existing their projects. Although we and others have noted that some broadband networks and should also make new, privately of the money is being spent on dead-end technology, overall funded broadband builds more economically feasible. The these programs should improve broadband access and op- NTIA grants may well be “gifts that keep on giving,” and tions for many Americans. we look forward to seeing their effects. The Rural Utilities Service, which focused on first- In this Fiber Deployment Roundup, we not only list the mile projects, is funding many fiber-to-the-home builds, final awards to FTTH projects and report on awardees’ vendor large and small, that will help to rapidly bring disadvan- selections, but we also profile several awardees, showing what taged communities into the 21st-century knowledge econ- their projects will mean for their communities. omy. The National Telecommunications and Informa- tion Administration focused on middle-mile projects and – MZ Final RUS Awards for FTTH Projects The final batches of RUS broadband stimulus awards included several went to rural electric cooperatives, and there were also wireless, DSL, satellite and cable technologies, along with a siz- four awards for countywide or multicounty public broadband able helping of fiber. Projects that include FTTH are shown networks. Though many awardees had prior experience with below. Most awards went to the small rural telcos that are FTTH, quite a few appear to be embarking on their first fiber traditional recipients of RUS broadband funding. However, builds. (See earlier issues of BBP for more RUS awards.) Provider State Amount Potential Subscribers Prior ($ millions)* FTTH? Arrowhead Electric Cooperative MN $16.1 11,363 residents, 138 businesses, 63 community www.aecimn.com institutions Cass County MO $26.0 25,900 residents, 710 businesses, 118 community www.casscounty.com institutions Cedar Falls Utilities** IA $0.9 1,753 residents, 259 businesses in 89 square miles x www.cfu.net outside existing territory Cross Telephone Company** OK $17.6 52,000 residents, 4,180 businesses, 111 community x www.crosstel.net institutions Five Area Telephone Cooperative TX $2.5 498 residents, 235 businesses, 1 community institution x www.fivearea.com Hill Country Telephone Cooperative** TX $12.2 4,200 residents x www.hctc.net 22 | BROADBAND PROPERTIES | www.broadbandproperties.com | OCTOBER 2010 Provider State Amount Potential Subscribers Prior ($ millions)* FTTH? Kit Carson Electric Cooperative NM $63.8 20,500 households, 3,600 businesses, 183 community www.kitcarson.com institutions, two Native American Pueblos La Jicarita Rural Telephone Cooperative NM $11.9 3,000 residents, 40 businesses, 8 community institutions www.lajicarita.com Lake County MN $66.4 37,000 residents, 1,000 businesses, 98 community www.co.lake.mn.us institutions LENOWISCO Planning District Commission/ VA $20.2 42,000 residents, 1,550 businesses, 100 community x Sunset Digital Communications institutions www.lenowisco.org Medicine Park Telephone Company OK, TX $3.0 4,500 residents, 3 businesses, 30 community institutions x www.mptelco.com Midstate Communications SD $9.1 3,715 residents, 176 businesses, 28 community x www.midstatesd.net institutions Midvale Telephone AZ, ID $4.5 1,400 residents, 130 businesses, 7 community x Exchange institutions www.midvaletelephone.com North Alabama Electric Cooperative AL $19.1 20,120 residents, 1,442 businesses, 53 community www.naecoop.com institutions Orangeburg County SC $18.7 9,078 residents, 90 businesses, 12 community www.orangeburgcounty.org institutions Pioneer Telephone Cooperative OK $35.9 9,800 residents, 160 businesses, 5 community x www.ptci.com institutions Plains Cooperative Telephone Association CO $11.1 2,740 residents, 272 businesses, 42 community www.plainstel.com institutions Pride Network LA $36.2 25,243 residents, 2,978 businesses, 172 community x www.xfone.com institutions Red River Rural Telephone Association ND, $9.1 2,600 residents, 228 businesses, 6 community x www.rrt.net MN institutions Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe NY $10.6 3,750 residents, 200 businesses, 42 community www.srmt-nsn.gov institutions Scott County Telephone Cooperative VA $24.9 12,000 residents, 80 businesses, 16 community x www.sctc.org institutions Sjoberg’s Cable MN $.9 656 residents, 15 businesses, many small farms, 3 x www.mncable.net community institutions Smithville Telephone Company** MS $7.1 1,795 residents, 15 businesses, 5 community institutions x www.smithville.net Southwest Telephone Exchange IA $6.0 1,468 residents, 55 businesses, 9 community institutions x www.interstatecom.com Spruce Knob Seneca Rocks Telephone WV $8.5 6,378 residents, 207 businesses, 23 community x www.spruceknob.net institutions Stoneham Cooperative Telephone CO $1.6 155 residents, 9 businesses, 4 community institutions Corporation 970-735-2251 Sunset Digital Communications TN $24.5 27,500 residents, 471 businesses, 65 community x (with www.sunsetcom.net institutions LENOWISCO Planning Commission) Trans-Cascades Telephone Company OR $2.4 340 residents, 46 businesses, 3 community institutions x www.relianceconnects.com Tri-County Telephone Membership Corp. NC $14.1 10,780 residents, 889 businesses, 32 community x www.gotricounty.biz/ institutions United Electric Cooperative MO $21.2 www.ueci.org OCTOBER 2010 | www.broadbandproperties.com | BROADBAND PROPERTIES | 23 Provider State Amount Potential Subscribers Prior ($ millions)* FTTH? Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Company VT $5.6 1,385 residents, 56 businesses, 2 community institutions x www.wcvt.com Willard Telephone Company CO $0.8 1,900 residents, 8 businesses, 3 community institutions 970-228-4571 Yadkin Valley Telephone Membership NC $21.7 12,803 residents, 606 businesses, 56 community x Corporation institutions www.yadtel.net * May be supplemented by funding from other sources **Includes wireless or DSL technology as well as FTTH INDEPENDENT TELCOS Stimulus Funding Recipients Select Vendors Yadkin Valley Telephone Membership Corporation in North Carolina will use Broadband loans and grants will allow rural Zhone’s MXK intelligent GPON solu- tion and its zNID optical network termi- telcos to accelerate their plans for deploying fiber nals (ONTs) for its broadband stimulus- funded project. Since 2007, Yadkin has to homes and businesses. passed more than 16,000 homes and businesses with fiber – 42 percent of the premises within its footprint – and, with project. Shawnee was awarded $8.5 mil- FTTP network in the rural Morris, the help of the RUS grant and loan, it lion in federal and state funds to connect Minn., exchange, and Farmers Tele- will now be able to reach the rural por- homes, businesses, government offices phone Company received $9.7 million tions of its service area more quickly. and medical facilities in one of the na- to build out fiber facilities and services “One of the initial goals for our tion’s most remote and underserved re- to rural parts of its serving area. Both FTTH project was to reach all custom- gions. Long distances between commu- Federated and Farmers will deploy ers within our regional footprint with nities and a dispersed population have GENBAND’s C15 to increase network fiber-based triple-play services by 2019,” posed challenges in bringing broadband capacity, improve efficiency, lower costs explains Mitzie Branon, Yadkin’s gen- access to the 90 Illinois communities and deliver advanced IP residential and eral manager. “However, with the re- that Shawnee serves. With Zhone’s plat- business communications services. Tom ceipt of the broadband stimulus funding form, Shawnee can use a combination Lorenz, operations manager of Federated and the support of Zhone as our GPON of broadband technologies, including Telephone Cooperative, says small and partner, we will be able to overcome the GPON and ADSL2+, to provide high- medium business customers will now be anticipated cost challenges and time- speed access to even the most rural loca- able to install unified communications, to-market requirements for the rural tions in a cost-effective manner. hosted call centers and videoconferenc- fiber extension and complete our entire Halstad Telephone Company ing capabilities without having to invest FTTH project by 2015 – which is four (HTC), Federated Telephone Coop- in managing equipment on premises. years earlier than initially planned.” erative and Farmers Mutual Tele- NTELOS, which received a broad- Brian Caskey, chief marketing officer phone Company have all selected band stimulus grant to build out FTTH for Zhone, says the broadband stimulus GENBAND’s C15 compact softswitch to 9,000 premises, will use ADTRAN’s initiative has accounted for an uptick in to help deliver services over fiber. HTC, flagship product, the Total Access 5000 the number of fiber projects the com- which received $11.7 million in broad- Multi-Service Access and Aggregation pany has been asked to support. band stimulus funds, deployed the C15 Platform (MSAP)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) ) Petition for Preemption of ) North Carolina General Statutes ) § 160A-340 Et Seq
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ____________________________________ ) ) In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) ) Petition for Preemption of ) North Carolina General Statutes ) § 160A-340 et seq. ) WC Docket No. 14-115 ) The Electric Power Board of ) Chattanooga, Tennessee ) ) Petition for Preemption of a Portion of ) Section 7-52-601 of the Tennessee Code ) Annotated ) WC Docket No. 14-116 ) ____________________________________ ) COMMENTS OF THE FIBER TO THE HOME COUNCIL AMERICAS IN SUPPORT OF ELECTRIC POWER BOARD AND CITY OF WILSON PETITIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 706 OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996, SEEKING PREEMPTION OF STATE LAWS RESTRICTING THE DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN BROADBAND NETWORKS Heather Burnett Gold President Fiber to the Home Council Americas 6841 Elm Street #843 McLean, VA 22101 Telephone: (202) 365-5530 August 29, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................................1 I. MUNICIPAL UTILITIES HAVE AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY WHERE PRIVATE PROVIDERS HAVE NOT DEPLOYED ADEQUATE ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY IN A REASONABLE AND TIMELY FASHION ............................................................................................................3 II. STATE LAWS AND RULES THAT BAR DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY BY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES IN AREAS WHERE PRIVATE PROVIDERS HAVE NOT DEPLOYED ADEQUATE ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY IN A REASONABLE AND
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Benefits of Broadband Competition in Terms of Service and Opportunities for Low-Income Communities
    DRAFT Benefits of Broadband Competition in Terms of Service and Opportunities for Low-Income Communities Prepared for the City of Madison, Wisconsin Benefits of Broadband Competition | DRAFT | March 2018 March 2018 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 2 Research Overview on Competition and Digital Equity .......................................................... 3 3 Two Case Studies on the Effects of Competition .................................................................... 6 3.1 The Google Fiber Case ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Arrival of Google Fiber in Kansas City ....................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Comcast and Time Warner Cable Announce Free Speed Increases ......................... 6 3.1.3 AT&T Announces Upgrades and Cites Push for “Competition” ............................... 7 3.1.4 Incumbents May Have Boosted Speeds as Early as 2012 ......................................... 7 3.2 The Urbana/Champaign Case ........................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 The UC2B Network .................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Incumbent Response Began When UC2B Starts Connecting Homes ....................... 8 3.2.3 AT&T and Comcast Stopped Raising Prices and Comcast Boosted Speeds .............
    [Show full text]
  • Fiber Trends: What 2021 Promises for the Broadband Industry
    INDUSTRY ANALYSIS Fiber Trends: What 2021 Promises For the Broadband Industry The 2021 broadband plans of incumbent telcos, independents, cable operators and electric co-ops will have a ripple effect on consumers and businesses. By Sean Buckley / Broadband Communities s the new year begins, BROADBAND the next decade if the telecom companies COMMUNITIES is asking industry successfully execute on their plans,” said Acolleagues what will drive the broadband Jonathan Chaplin, equity analyst for New industry in 2021. If anything is clear about the Street Research, in a research note. “This would past year, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted take FTTH availability from 25 percent to that broadband has gone from being a luxury to a 35 percent of households – we assume growth necessity for remote learning and remote work. in occupied households of about 1 percent.” Key to that is a fiber-based symmetrical Render predicts that the potential number of connection. Whether service is from homes that could be passed by FTTH will be an incumbent telco, a cable company, a even larger when taking into account that a host municipality or an electric cooperative, fiber has of emerging players are building out service to a ripple effect: It gives consumers higher speeds more homes. “There are more than 1,000 other and can serve as an economic development tool providers in the United States alone – some to attract and retain businesses. small, some medium, some large – that add RVA LLC noted that as of 2020, more than up to more than 10 million,” Render said. 54 million U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-15-25A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-25 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) City of Wilson, North Carolina ) WC Docket No. 14-115 Petition for Preemption of North Carolina General ) Statute Sections 160A-340 et seq. ) ) The Electric Power Board of ) WC Docket No. 14-116 Chattanooga, Tennessee ) Petition for Preemption of a Portion of Tennessee ) Code Annotated Section 7-52-601 ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2015 Released: March 12, 2015 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn and Rosenworcel issuing separate statements; Commissioners Pai and O’Rielly dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Executive Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 B. Background.................................................................................................................................... 17 1. The Commission’s Mandate Under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act ................. 18 2. The EPB Petition and Territorial Restriction in Section 601 .................................................. 22 3. The Wilson Petition and H.B.129 ........................................................................................... 33 II. PREEMPTION OF PROHIBITIONS ON MUNICIPAL PROVISION
    [Show full text]
  • Blair Levin and Denise Linn a Guide for Community Leaders Seeking
    THE NEXT GENERATION NETWORK CONNECTIVITY HANDBOOK A Guide for Community Leaders Seeking Affordable, Abundant Bandwidth Vol 2.0 December 2016 Blair Levin and Denise Linn Gig.U: The Next Generation Network Innovation Project Published by the Benton Foundation 2 Dedication This Handbook is dedicated to the hundreds of city and university officials, particularly participants in Gig.U, who over the last five years, as we explored many routes, helped guide us to significant course corrections and created the map for community-led broadband. It is also dedicated to the thousands of citizens who attended scores of meetings with us on community-led broadband, in cities large and small, in every part of the country, and who provided many insights we incorporated into our work and into this Handbook. Many of their words were wise, but none were wiser than those offered by a student at an event at the University of Maine, who, after noting all the specific reasons he was excited about having access to abundant bandwidth then said, “But what is most exciting is what we don’t yet know.” It is further dedicated to the memory of Charles Benton, a wonderful friend and coach to the Gig.U project, and many others seeking to improve the capacity of communications networks to serve all. His energy and excitement about discovering ‘what we don’t yet know’ served, and will continue to serve, as the most important type of fuel for the work of bringing affordable, abundant bandwidth to our communities. 3 Contents About this Handbook 5 What are the Funding Issues
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Broadband Solutions
    COMMUNITY-BASED BROADBAND SOLUTIONS THE BENEFITS OF COMPETITION AND CHOICE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HIGHSPEED INTERNET ACCESS The Executive Office of the President January 2015 1 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 Economic Benefits of Broadband ...................................................................................................... 5 Challenges in Broadband Access and Adoption ............................................................................... 6 Broadband Competition .................................................................................................................. 10 Community-Based Broadband ........................................................................................................ 13 Chattanooga, TN: Gigabit service drives investment, innovation .............................................. 13 Wilson, NC: Municipal broadband encourages private competition ......................................... 14 Lafayette, LA: Network increases customer savings, strengthens local anchor institutions .... 15 Scott County, MN: Municipal government sees savings for county, school operations ........... 16 Leverett, MA: State and federal programs enable local investment ...........................................17 Choctaw Nation Tribal Area, OK: Public private collaboration brings broadband to new communities ..................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Fiber Projects in the US
    Several municipal fiber deployments that have been in the works for a long time are getting under way. By Masha Zager ◆ Telecom Editor he mills of municipal government may grind residents, and that persistence has paid off. slowly, but they get the job done. Municipali- This month, we see substantial progress on munici- ties, even those that already own their own util- pal fiber projects ranging from the enormous Amsterdam T ity companies, don’t have the same flexibility CityNet, which is already under construction, to some small private companies have when it comes to building telecom towns in Virginia that are just beginning their planning pro- infrastructure. They have to jump through hoops and over cess. Also worth noting is that the Jackson Energy Authority hurdles that the private sector can’t even imagine: approvals – one of the earliest deployers of municipal fiber in the US by multiple levels of officialdom, public referendums, legis- – will be taking over from Cinergy as a retail provider of lative battles and lawsuits are not uncommon. Some proj- voice and Internet service to Jackson-area customers. ects fall by the wayside, and others take years to get started. We also bring you the latest updates on Verizon’s FiOS But both in this country and Europe, localities have been build, independent telcos, European and Asian projects, persistent in their goal of bringing high-speed broadband to and more. Municipal Fiber Projects in the US he City of Palo Alto, California, which issued an system and provide other benefits for the Chattanooga area. RFP for a municipal broadband system nearly a year Harold DePriest, EPB’s President and CEO, cites a recent T ago, has awarded a contract to 180 Connect Network study by professors at the University of Tennessee at Chat- Services to develop a FTTP network that covers all 31,000 tanooga and Tennessee State University suggesting that homes and businesses in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition to Proposed Merger of Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable October 2, 2014
    Opposition to Proposed Merger of Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable October 2, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Consumers Union, the public policy and advocacy division of Consumer Reports,1 respectfully requests that the U.S. Department of Justice bring action to enjoin the proposed merger of Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable (“TWC”).2 We believe this merger violates section 7 of the Clayton Act, as it would substantially lessen competition, impede innovation by online video distributors, threaten innovation in equipment and platforms, and reduce the quality and diversity of information sources and services to the public, all to the detriment of consumers. Moreover, it would encourage a cascade of new mergers, opening the floodgates to even further concentration; new deals are already being proposed or reportedly under consideration in the wake of the Comcast/TWC announcement. To justify the merger, Comcast and TWC claim unconvincingly that they already face abundant and growing competition, and that they will continue to. Consumers rightly do not see it that way. Widespread consumer complaints of high prices, poor service, and no choices are unmistakable hallmarks of an absence of meaningful competition. Comcast and TWC already 1 Consumers Union is the public policy and advocacy division of Consumer Reports. Consumers Union works for a fair, just, and safe marketplace for all consumers and to empower consumers to protect themselves, focusing on the areas of telecommunications, health care, food and product safety, energy, and financial services, among others. Consumer Reports is the world’s largest independent product-testing organization. Using its more than 50 labs, auto test center, and survey research center, the nonprofit organization rates thousands of products and services annually.
    [Show full text]
  • SEC Network Affiliates 061019
    SMSO Name MSO Name Phone Number URL NCTC 3 Rivers Communications 800-796-4567 https://3rivers.net/ NCTC Access Cable Television Inc 606-677-2444 https://www.accesshsd.com/ NCTC Ace Telephone Associations (aka AcenTek & Ace Communications Group) 888-404-4940 https://www.acentek.net/2014/09/15/ace-communications-is-now-acentek/ NCTC Adams CATV, Inc (888) 222-0077 https://adamscable.com/ NCTC ADVANCED SATELLITE SYSTEMS, INC. (501) 835-3474 https://disharkansas.com/ NCTC Albany Mutual Telephone 320.845.2101 https://www.albanytel.com/ NCTC Algona Municipal Utilities 515.295.3584 http://www.netamu.com/ NCTC All West/Utah, Inc. (435) 783-4361 http://www.allwest.com/ NCTC Allen's TV Cable Service, Inc. (985) 384-8335 http://www.atvc.net/ NCTC Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc 605-594-3411 https://www.alliancecom.net/ NCTC Allo Communications 844-560-2556 https://www.allocommunications.com/ NCTC Alpine Cable Television, L.C. (800) 635-1059 https://www.alpinecom.net/ NCTC Alta Municipal Utilities 712-200-1122 https://www.alta-tec.net/ NTTC/Vivicast Amarillo Wireless dba AW Broadband 806-316-5071 https://amarillowireless.net/ NCTC American Broadband (fka Huntel Systems, Inc.) 888-262-2661 https://www.abbnebraska.com/ NCTC American Cable TV 4COM Americas Center Corporation-Holding,LLC (618) 257-3750 https://www.manta.com/c/mtbzdpz/americas-center-corporation NCTC Applied Communications Technolgy/Arapahoe Cable TV Inc 888 565-5422 http://www.atcjet.net/ NCTC Arkwest Communications, Inc. 479-495-4200 http://www.arkwest.com/ NCTC Armstrong Utilities, Inc. (724) 283-0925 http://www.agoc.com/Contact NCTC Arthur Mutual Telephone Company (419) 393-2233 http://www.artelco.net/index.php NTTC/Vivicast Ashland Home Net Corporation 541-488-9207 http://ashlandhome.net/Default.asp AT&T U-verse (800) 331-0500 https://www.att.com/tv/u-verse.html NCTC Atkins Cablevision, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ratingsdirect®
    STANDARD &PO OR"S RATINGS SERVICES RatingsDirect® Summary: Chattanooga, Tennessee; Retail Electric Primary Credit Analyst: Judith G Waite, New York ( 1) 212-438-7677; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Theodore A Chapman, Dallas ( 1) 214-871-1401; [email protected] Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research WWW.STANDARDAlfDPOORS.COM/RATINOSDIRECT OCTOBER 10, 2012 1 Exhibit 6 to EPB Petition Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 199&021749 1 300000519 October 10, 2012 Standard and Poor's Ratings Upgrade - Page 1 Summary: Chattanooga, Tennessee; Retail Electric Credit Profile Chattanooga retail elec Long Term Rating M+/Stable Upgraded Chattanooga (Chattanooga Blee Pwr Brd) Unenhanced Rating M+(SPUR)/Stable Upgraded Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has raised its rating on the City of Chattanooga (EPB). Tenn's electric system revenue bonds to 'AA+' from 'AA'. The outlook is stable. At fiscal year-end 2012 (June 30), the utility had $287.5 million of debt outstanding. A net revenue pledge of the electric system secures the bonds. The higher rating reflects both our assessment of the utility's strong credit metrics in fiscal 2012 and our view that the stronger metrics are sustainable, based on our opinion that management's forecast assumptions are reasonable. In 2008, EPB issued $220 million of revenue bonds, ofwhlch $169 million funded the completion ofa fiber optic network. Initially, the fiber network was to be for infrastructure interconnectivity purposes, which allows for more automation, demand-side management, and operating savings. Now, the network also provides Internet, phone, and video service.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Dugan CTO, Lumen Through the Eyes of 3 Team Members
    ICT SOLUTIONS & EDUCATION NOVEMBER 2020 Getting to Know Andrew Dugan CTO, Lumen Through the Eyes of 3 Team Members ALSO INSIDE ISE EXPO 2020 Program Guide Tuning Into the Future 5G’s Surprising BFFs The Right Kind of Enablers VOLUME 38, ISSUE 11 www.isemag.com Home Sweet Digital Home Evolve your network, transform their world. Lives are transformed when people have access to affordable, reliable broadband. At Corning, we help businesses stay ahead of demand for high-bandwidth capabilities so they can deliver on the promise of life-changing possibilities like telemedicine – wherever people feel most at home. Whether you are an experienced network operator or are just bringing broadband to life for the first time, connect with Corning to for a free FTTH market assessment for your community at www.corning.com/community-broadband. © 2018 Corning Optical Communications. CRR-838-AEN / December 2018 Home Sweet Digital Home Evolve your network, transform their world. Lives are transformed when people have access to affordable, reliable broadband. At Corning, we help businesses stay ahead of demand for high-bandwidth capabilities so they can deliver on the promise of life-changing possibilities like telemedicine – wherever people feel most at home. Whether you are an experienced network operator or are just bringing broadband to life for the first time, connect with Corning to for a free FTTH market assessment for your community at www.corning.com/community-broadband. © 2018 Corning Optical Communications. CRR-838-AEN / December 2018 CONTENTS 38 Winning the 5G Marathon Requires the FEATURES Right Strategies Don’t Let Powering or Optical Connectivity Slow You Down By Kevin Bourg 12 Telecom providers who want to win the 5G marathon must embrace new powering and optical connectivity strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of EBP's Failed Government-Owned Internet, Cable
    $'!%5<-5347 #"#% #!& %-%!" #"#% "#" ,(%"-#!!&&#"% #"#% '-#!!&&#"% #"#% &&#&"*#% -#!!&&#"% #"#% 0 ,-#!!&&#"% % #!!("'#"&#!!&&#" 77845''%'- &"'#"-53887 "' ''%# '%#*%#%#''"##-""&& #' #.47/449 &$ & & "& * $' # $ + ,&% $&" " " * # !) ! $ ( An Overview of EBP’s Failed Government-Owned Internet, Cable and Telephone Experiment in Chattanooga • The total cost of the Chattanooga Electric Power Board’s (EPB) fiber Smart Grid to taxpayers and electric rate payers is at least $552 million. The Smart Grid is the infrastructure used to provide Internet, cable and telephone services. • Electric ratepayers pay for every dime of the cost of the Smart Grid not covered by taxpayers, fully subsidizing fiber customers for the cost associated with the infrastructure built largely to provide fiber services. • Despite paying nothing for infrastructure, EPB’s fiber services are just barely profitable. • Over its life, the bond issued to partially fund the Smart Grid will cost each of EPB’s 171,975 electric customers $2,276. +$,%&%#''#" "-43; . %'%'- #*% ) - +"%- .556471:36255</3587 ***.$%#''"'+$,%&.#% • EPB received $111.6 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds from the pockets of U.S. taxpayers to subsidize the Smart Grid used to provide Internet, video and phone services. • Only 11 business customers subscribe to EPB’s Gig service as of March 2014. • Despite promises of massive economic development as a result of Chattanooga government-owned fiber scheme, no new jobs have been created. • It is likely that EPB can’t actually provide its famed Gig speed internet service. The utility refuses to agree to public speed tests. • Though illegal, EPB is apparently engaging in cross-subsidization between its electric and fiber divisions. • In order to prevent negative information from being released, EPB has coerced an intern, forced an organization to terminate a professional woman and bullied media outlets by threatening to rescind advertising money if critical coverage of the utility was released.
    [Show full text]