Methodology for Liturgical Theology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Methodology for Liturgical Theology How Close is God? How is God Close? Methodology for Liturgical Theology James O’Regan Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology, Saint Paul University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Theology Ottawa, Canada February 4, 2013 © James O’Regan, Ottawa, Canada, 2013 ii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations...................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................... ix Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 1 . Origin of the Thesis ...........................................................................................................1 2 . Shape of the Thesis ............................................................................................................2 3 . Caveat ................................................................................................................................2 4 . Limits to the Research .......................................................................................................5 5 . Note on Tables and Figures ...............................................................................................5 1 . Introduction........................................................................................................................6 2 . Statement of the Problem...................................................................................................6 3 . State of the Question..........................................................................................................7 4 . Literature Review...............................................................................................................9 4.1 . The Literature..........................................................................................................9 4.2 . Bibliographic Relation among Authors ................................................................10 4.3 . Overall Character of the Literature .......................................................................12 4.4 . Liturgical Law.......................................................................................................13 4.5 . Raymond Clarke ...................................................................................................15 4.5.1 . Addressing Event ...........................................................................................17 4.5.2 . Advances in Methodology .............................................................................17 4.6 . Joseph Gelineau ....................................................................................................19 4.6.1 . Addressing Event ...........................................................................................20 4.6.2 . Advances in Methodology .............................................................................20 4.7 . Robert Hovda .......................................................................................................22 4.7.1 . Addressing Event ...........................................................................................22 4.7.2 . Advances in Methodology .............................................................................23 4.8 . Mark Searle...........................................................................................................24 4.8.1 . Addressing Event ...........................................................................................25 4.8.2 . Advances in Methodology .............................................................................26 4.9 . Allan Bouley .........................................................................................................27 4.9.1 . Addressing Event ..........................................................................................28 4.9.2 . Advances in Methodology .............................................................................29 4.10 . Aidan Kavanagh..................................................................................................32 4.10.1 . Addressing Event .........................................................................................33 4.10.2 . Advances in Methodology ...........................................................................34 4.11 . Kevin Irwin .........................................................................................................34 4.11.1 . Addressing Event .........................................................................................35 4.11.2 . Advances in Methodology ...........................................................................36 4.12 . Richard McCall...................................................................................................40 4.12.1 . Addressing Event .........................................................................................41 4.12.2 . Advances in Methodology ...........................................................................42 5 . Summary of the Literature ...............................................................................................43 iii 6 . Calls for Methodology in the Construction of a Liturgical Event Theology..................46 7 . Paradigms in Classical Liturgical Theology ....................................................................52 8 . Parsing the Literature for Liturgical Dynamics ...............................................................53 9 . Hypothesis........................................................................................................................55 10 . Methodology and Methods ............................................................................................56 11 . Summary ........................................................................................................................61 Chapter 2...............................................................................................................................62 1 . Introduction......................................................................................................................62 2 . Constructing a Liturgical Theology to Account for Liturgical OLE Dynamics..............63 2.1 . A Dynamic World.................................................................................................63 2.2 . Dynamics, Hermeneutics and Liturgical Text ......................................................69 2.3 . Importance of Dynamics.......................................................................................72 2.4 . Dynamics Noted in the Literature.........................................................................73 2.4.1 . The Burns Effect ............................................................................................74 2.4.2 . Kavanagh’s Lament .......................................................................................75 2.4.3 . Guardini’s Insistence .....................................................................................75 2.4.4 . GIRM’s Expression .......................................................................................76 2.4.5 . Stanislavski’s Caution....................................................................................77 2.4.6 . De Saussure’s Decision..................................................................................77 2.4.7 . Wittgenstein’s Other ......................................................................................78 2.4.8 . Sacrosanctum Concilium’s “Physicality Quotient” .......................................78 2.4.9 . Optimal Timing..............................................................................................79 3 . Applying Proximity to Dynamics ....................................................................................80 3.1 . Definition of Proximity.........................................................................................80 3.2 . The Theory of Proximity - What is it?..................................................................80 3.3 . Proximity in the Literature....................................................................................85 3.5 . Implicit Use of Proximity in the Literature...........................................................86 3.6 . Proximity Fitting the Criteria from the Literature ................................................88 4 . Proximity as a Methodology - Introduction.....................................................................92 4.1 . Proximity as Direct Access Methodology ............................................................92 4.2 . Data, Data Handling, Data Interpretation .............................................................95 4.2.1 . Data ................................................................................................................96 4.2.2 . Data Handling ................................................................................................97 4.2.3 . Data Interpretation .........................................................................................99
Recommended publications
  • The Twentieth Century Reform of the Liturgy: Outcomes and Prospects John F
    Valparaiso University ValpoScholar Institute of Liturgical Studies Occasional Papers Institute of Liturgical Studies 2017 The weT ntieth Century Reform of the Liturgy: Outcomes and Prospects John F. Baldovin S.J. Boston College School of Theology & Ministry, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/ils_papers Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Liturgy and Worship Commons Recommended Citation Baldovin, John F. S.J., "The wT entieth Century Reform of the Liturgy: Outcomes and Prospects" (2017). Institute of Liturgical Studies Occasional Papers. 126. http://scholar.valpo.edu/ils_papers/126 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute of Liturgical Studies at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute of Liturgical Studies Occasional Papers by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. The Twentieth Century Reform of the Liturgy: Outcomes and Prospects John F. Baldovin, S.J. Boston College School of Theology & Ministry Introduction Metanoiete. From the very first word of Jesus recorded in the Gospel of Mark reform and renewal have been an essential feature of Christian life and thought – just as they were critical to the message of the prophets of ancient Israel. The preaching of the Gospel presumes at least some openness to change, to acting differently and to thinking about things differently. This process has been repeated over and over again over the centuries. This insight forms the backbone of Gerhard Ladner’s classic work The Idea of Reform, where renovatio and reformatio are constants throughout Christian history.1 All of the great reform movements in the past twenty centuries have been in response to both changing cultural and societal circumstances (like the adaptation of Christianity north of the Alps) and the failure of Christians individually and communally to live up to the demands of the Gospel.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is “Ad Orientem”? Why Is the Priest Celebrating with His When We All Celebrate Facing East, the Us to God
    What is “Ad Orientem”? Why is the priest celebrating with his When we all celebrate facing East, the us to God. Look where he’s pointing, not back to us? He isn’t. He could only ‘have priest is part of the people, not separated at the one pointing. his back to us’, if we were the center of from them. He is their leader and Facing East reinforces the mystery his attention at Mass. But we aren’t, God representative before God and we are of the Mass. We have become so is. The priest is celebrating looking east, all one, together in our posture. Think familiar with the actions of the priest; in anticipation of the coming of Jesus. about all those battle we sometimes forget Remember the words of the Advent images of generals the great mystery at the hymn, People Look East? “People, look on horseback—they heart of it: that the priest East. The time is near of the crowning of are facing with their exercises his priesthood the year. Make your house fair as you are troops, not facing in Jesus Himself and it able, trim the hearth and set the table. against them. Just so, is Jesus really and truly People, look East and sing today: Love, the priest is visibly present both standing as the guest, is on the way.” part of the people and the priest and on the altar We have become so familiar to Mass clearly acts in persona as the sacrifice. When celebrated with the priest facing us that Christi capitis, “in the the priest bends low over we have forgotten that this is a relatively person of Christ the the elements and then new innovation both historically and head,” when we all face elevates, first the host and liturgically and actually something that the same direction.
    [Show full text]
  • SACRED MUSIC Winter 2002 Volume 129 No.4
    SACRED MUSIC Winter 2002 Volume 129 No.4 -~..~ " 1 ......... -- Cathedral and Campanile, Florence, Italy. SACRED MUSIC Volume 129, Number 4, Winter 2002 EDITORIAL 3 Kneeling for Holy Communion SIR RICHARD TERRY AND THE WESTMINSTER CATHEDRAL TRADITION 5 Leonardo J. Gajardo "ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC?" 9 Joseph H. Foegen, Ph.D. NARROWING THE FACTUAL BASES OF THE AD ORIENTEM POSITION 13 Fr. Timothy Johnson KNEELING FOR COMMUNION IN AMERICA?-YES! 20 Two letters from Rome REVIEWS 22 OPEN FORUM 25 NEWS 25 CONTRIBUTORS 27 INDEX 28 SACRED MUSIC Continuation of Caecilia, published by the Society of St. Caecilia since 1874, and The Catholic Choirmaster, published by the Society of St. Gregory of America since 1915. Published quarterly by the Church Music Association of America. Office of Publication: 134 Christendom Drive, Front Royal, VA 22630-5103. E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Assistant: Christine Collins News: Kurt Poterack Music for Review: Calvert Shenk, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, 2701 West Chicago Blvd., Detroit, MI 48206 Susan Treacy, Dept. of Music, Franciscan University, Steubenville, OH 43952-6701 Membership, Circulation and Advertising: 5389 22nd Ave. SW, Naples, FL 34116 CHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA Officers and Board of Directors President Father Robert Skeris Vice-President Father Robert Pasley General Secretary Rosemary Reninger Treasurer Ralph Stewart Directors Rev. Ralph S. March, S.O. Cist. Stephen Becker Father Robert Pasley Kurt Poterack Rosemary Reninger Paul F. Salumunovich Rev. Robert A. Skeris Brian Franck Susan Treacy Calvert Shenk Monsignor Richard Schuler Ralph Stewart Membership in the Church Music Association of America includes a subscription to SACRED MUSIC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite
    A Comparison of the Two Forms of the Roman Rite Mass Structures Orientation Language The purpose of this presentation is to prepare you for what will very likely be your first Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). This is officially named “The Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” We will try to do that by comparing it to what you already know - the Novus Ordo Missae (NOM). This is officially named “The Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.” In “Mass Structures” we will look at differences in form. While the TLM really has only one structure, the NOM has many options. As we shall see, it has so many in fact, that it is virtually impossible for the person in the pew to determine whether the priest actually performs one of the many variations according to the rubrics (rules) for celebrating the NOM. Then, we will briefly examine the two most obvious differences in the performance of the Mass - the orientation of the priest (and people) and the language used. The orientation of the priest in the TLM is towards the altar. In this position, he is facing the same direction as the people, liturgical “east” and, in a traditional church, they are both looking at the tabernacle and/or crucifix in the center of the altar. The language of the TLM is, of course, Latin. It has been Latin since before the year 400. The NOM was written in Latin but is usually performed in the language of the immediate location - the vernacular. [email protected] 1 Mass Structure: Novus Ordo Missae Eucharistic Prayer Baptism I: A,B,C,D Renewal Eucharistic Prayer II: A,B,C,D Liturgy of Greeting: Penitential Concluding Dismissal: the Word: A,B,C Rite: A,B,C Eucharistic Prayer Rite: A,B,C A,B,C Year 1,2,3 III: A,B,C,D Eucharistic Prayer IV: A,B,C,D 3 x 4 x 3 x 16 x 3 x 3 = 5184 variations (not counting omissions) Or ~ 100 Years of Sundays This is the Mass that most of you attend.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recollections of Encolpius
    The Recollections of Encolpius ANCIENT NARRATIVE Supplementum 2 Editorial Board Maaike Zimmerman, University of Groningen Gareth Schmeling, University of Florida, Gainesville Heinz Hofmann, Universität Tübingen Stephen Harrison, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Costas Panayotakis (review editor), University of Glasgow Advisory Board Jean Alvares, Montclair State University Alain Billault, Université Jean Moulin, Lyon III Ewen Bowie, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Jan Bremmer, University of Groningen Ken Dowden, University of Birmingham Ben Hijmans, Emeritus of Classics, University of Groningen Ronald Hock, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Niklas Holzberg, Universität München Irene de Jong, University of Amsterdam Bernhard Kytzler, University of Natal, Durban John Morgan, University of Wales, Swansea Ruurd Nauta, University of Groningen Rudi van der Paardt, University of Leiden Costas Panayotakis, University of Glasgow Stelios Panayotakis, University of Groningen Judith Perkins, Saint Joseph College, West Hartford Bryan Reardon, Professor Emeritus of Classics, University of California, Irvine James Tatum, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire Alfons Wouters, University of Leuven Subscriptions Barkhuis Publishing Zuurstukken 37 9761 KP Eelde the Netherlands Tel. +31 50 3080936 Fax +31 50 3080934 [email protected] www.ancientnarrative.com The Recollections of Encolpius The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction Gottskálk Jensson BARKHUIS PUBLISHING & GRONINGEN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GRONINGEN 2004 Bókin er tileinkuð
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Orientem” at St
    Liturgical Catechesis on “Ad Orientem” at St. John the Beloved “In Testimonium” Parish Bulletin Articles from October 2015 to May 2016 CITATIONS OF LITURGICAL DOCUMENTS IN ST. JOHN THE BELOVED PARISH BULLETIN Cardinal Sarah Speech at Sacra Liturgia USA 2015 (2015-10-18) SC 2.4 (2015-10-27) SC 7.8 (2015-11-01) SC 9 (2015-11-08) SC 11.12 (2015-11-15) Ecclesia de Eucharistia (2015-11-29) Ecclesia de Eucharistia (2015-12-06) Ecclesia de Eucharistia (2015-12-13) Sacramentum Caritatis, 20 (2016-01-31) Sacramentum Caritatis, 21 (2016-02-07) Sacramentum Caritatis, 55 (2016-02-14) Sacramentum Caritatis, 52 & 53a (2016-02-21) Sacramentum Caritatis, 53b & 38 (2016-02-28) “Silenziosa azione del cuore”, Cardinal Sarah, (2016-03-06) “Silenziosa azione del cuore”, Cardinal Sarah, (2016-03-13) “Silenziosa azione del cuore”, Cardinal Sarah, (2016-03-20) Spirit of the Liturgy, Cardinal Ratzinger, (2016-04-10) Roman Missal (2016-04-17) IN TESTIMONIUM… 18 OCTOBER 2015 Among my more memorable experiences of the visit of the Holy Father to the United States were the rehearsals for the Mass of Canonization. At the beginning of the second rehearsal I attended one of the Assistant Papal Masters of Ceremony, Monsignor John Cihak, addressed all the servers and other volunteers. He is a priest of the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon and also a seminary classmate of mine. Monsignor reminded all present that the primary protagonist in the Sacred Liturgy is the Holy Trinity. From that he expounded on the nature of reverence, both as a matter of interior activity and exterior stillness.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I 0.1. 1R-2R Reception of a Papal
    Corpus Christi College Cambridge / PARKER-ON-THE-WEB M.R. James, Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge 1912 MS 79 Stanley: C. 3 TJames: 23 Pontifical Pontificale (London) Codicology: Vellum, mm 400 x 255, (15.7 x 10 in.), ff. 24 + cclix, double columns of 30 lines. Cent. xiv-xv, in a fine upright black hand. Music on four-line stave. Collation: 14 (wants 1) 210 (1 canc.) 38 || 44 58-78 (+ slip after 1) 88 98 (5 is half a leaf) 108-138 (+ slip after 3) 148-198 206 218-298 (+ slip after 1) 308-348 (6-8 removed and replaced by) 35 (six) 368 (+ slip after 7) 38 (five). Provenance: Begun for Bishop Mona of St David's[], the book must have been completed after 1407 when Mona[] died and Clifford[] was translated to London[], and, in 1421, on Clifford[]'s death passed to Morgan[], who prefixed the first leaves. A Bishop in Henry VII[]'s time must have added the Office for the reception of a Nuncio. Additions: The decorative work is good throughout: the paintings not of high excellence. Photographic reproductions of a large number of them have been issued by the Alcuin Club under the editorship of the Rev. W. H. Frere[Frere 1901]. Research: Liebermann, p. xxi[Liebermann 1903], calls the MS. Cn and uses it for Excommunication form (p. 434). Decoration: The following is a short list of the subjects represented, besides those specified above. § I. Prima tonsura. Bust of tonsured youth. Ostiarius. Two gold keys.
    [Show full text]
  • People, Look East! Celebration of Mass Ad Orientem at Good Shepherd Advent and Christmas 2020
    PEOPLE, LOOK EAST! CELEBRATION OF MASS AD ORIENTEM AT GOOD SHEPHERD ADVENT AND CHRISTMAS 2020 INTRODUCTION Angels announce with shouts of mirth Him who brings new life to earth. Set every peak and valley humming With the word, the Lord is coming. People, look East and sing today – Love, the Lord, is on the way.1 1. In the normal course of events, outside of pandemic restrictions on our Masses, we would put these words on our lips at least once during the Season of Advent. People, look East, and sing today – Love, the Guest, the Rose, the Bird, the Star, the Lord, is on the way. Why look East for the coming of the Lord? 2. Part of that answer may come readily. “Because Bethlehem is to the East!” During this Season of Advent, we prepare to welcome the Christ Child, who was born in that direction. Just as those magi from the East set their sights West toward Bethlehem to find him, we in the West set our sights East for the same reason. We look East so that we may encounter the Lord who comes to us in gentleness, in mercy, and in love. 3. There is, however, another reason to look East during Advent – a reason why people both West and East of Bethlehem look in that direction. For we also enter into this Season of Advent preparing to welcome Christ when he comes again2 “in glory to judge the living and the dead.”3 Love, the Lord, tells us that when he comes again, he will come from the East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tridentine Mass / 1984 Editorial
    TRIDENTINE MASS On October 3, 1984, the Sacred Congregation of Divine Worship issued a letter concerning the limited use of the Tridentine Mass. This is the text of the letter: Four years ago, at the direction of Pope John Paul II, the bishops of the entire Church were invited to submit a report on the following topics: The manner in which the priests and the people of their dioceses, in observance of the decrees of Vatican Council II, have received the Roman Missal promulgated by author­ ity of Pope Paul VI; Problems arising in connection with the implementation of the liturgical reform; Opposition to the reform that may need to be overcome. The results of this survey here reported to all the bishops (See Notitiae, No. 185, December 1981). Based on the responses received from the bishops of the world, the problem of those priests and faithful who had remained attached to the so-called Tridentine rite seemed to have been almost completely resolved. But the problem perdures and the pope wishes to be responsive tv such groups of priests and faithful. Accordingly, he grants to diocesan bishops the faculty of using an indult on behalf of such priests and faithful. The diocesan bishop may allow those who are explicitly named in a petition submitted to him to celebrate Mass by use of the 1962 Roman Missal. The following norms must be observed: A. There must be unequivocal, even public evidence that the priest and people petition­ ing have no ties with those who impugn the lawfulness and doctrinal soundness of the Roman Missal promulgated in 1970 by Pope Paul VI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independence of the Celtic Church 121
    THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CELTIC CHURCH 121 THE INDEPENDENCE Oli" THE CELTIC CHURCH. BY THE REV. F. R. MONTGOMERY HITCHCOCK, D.D. THE CHURCH OF IRELAND: ITS CONNECTION WITH THE EAST; ITS DIFFERENCES FROM THE CHURCH OF ROME; ITS INDEPENDENCE. HE Church of Ireland until the twelfth century, generally T speaking, for six centuries, was a free and a nationa.J. Church. It had many points of contact with the Eastern Church which suggest an Eastern origin, and as many points of difference from the Roman Church which make a Roman origin impossible. In the first place, we shall briefly summarize the points of contact with the East. With regard to the monastic habitations, they resemble in plan, i.e. a group of small huts surrounded by a cashel, the communities of the East, like that of Mount Tabor, after which they were modelled. 1 The ascetic practices of the Irish hermit, such as suspending oneself by the armpits from hooks, a were imitations of the devices in self-torture discovered by the anchorites of the Syrian desert, probably in imitation of the Indian fakir's methods of self-torture. The smallness of the ·churches reminded travellers of those of Mount Athos and Asia Minor ; and the group of seven churches, e.g. at Glendalough and Clonmacnois suggests the " Seven Churches of Asia." The shape of the doors of the hermitages of SS. Flannan and Molua at Killaloe, broader at the threshold than at the head, resembles Egyptian style of architecture. The circle of the Irish cross is probably the loop of the crux ansata of the Egyptians, their circle of life being an emblem of immortality.
    [Show full text]
  • ()Rdinations in «Ew Chapel Set 'Or This Month Pioneer
    )EATH COMES TO FATHER J. J. GIBBONS ()RDINATIONS IN PIONEER NOTED «EW CHAPEL SET FOR HARD WORK IN EARLY DAYS 'OR THIS MONTH ^ / Thomas’ Seminary- to Be Scene of Rites, OMest Priest Among Diocesan Clergy of Colo­ Starting on Sunday, rado to Be Buried Saturday Dec. 6 Morning Several ordination ceremonies will be held this month at The death of the Rev. J. J. Gibbons Wednesday night at Thomas’ seminary, in the newly-completed chapel. For Mercy hospital, Denver, marked the passing of one of tbe out­ rs all the ordination rites have occurred in the Cathedral, The National Catholic Welfare Conference Newt Service Supplies The Denver Catholic Register and The Register. standing pioneer figures of the Church in Colorado. He was W e Have Alto Our Own Eztentive Special Service, the K. of C. Service, the Central Verein Service, the t, except for priesthood and perhaps other Major Orders, Fidet Service and the California Catholic Prett Service the oldest diocesan priest in Colorado, and, in spite of illness •y will be held in the future^ in the large new chapel at the in the last few years, remained actively engaged in his work as ^ inary VOL XXVII. No. 16. DENVER, COLO., THURSDAY, DEC. 3, 1931. $2.00 PER YEAR pastor of Presentation church, Barnum, almost until the eve ‘ ensure, the rite of introduction ate, the first of the Major Orders, in of his death. A giant in physical strength and mental stature, Jthe clerical state, will be given which the obligation to celibacy is he made an inestimable contribution to the growth of the |iday evening at 7 :30.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditio Studies-- in Ancient and Medieval ' History, Thought and Religion
    I ~. TRADITIO STUDIES-- IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL ' HISTORY, THOUGHT AND RELIGION Edited by JOHANNES QUASTEN and STEPHAN KUTTNER VOLUME III Published by COSMOPOLITAN SCIENCE & ART SERVICE CO., INC. New York 1945 , i i \ .....: . , . , ". CARDINALIS: THE HISTORY OF A CANONICAL CONCEPT By STEPHAN KUTTNER 1. INTRODUCTION* It is commonly known that in the canonical sources of ancient and early medieval times many bishops, priests and deacons throughout the Latin Church • ~n a.ddition to .the convent~onal sigla, abridged references will be used for the following pubhc~tlOns: AKKR - Archw fur katholisches Kirchenrecht.-M. Andrieu Les Ordines romanl du haut. m~ye"-a_ge I (Spicilegium aacrum Lovaniense 11, Louvain'1931).-Ans. Luc: - Ar~elml ep~8copl ~u.censis collectio carwnum ed. F. Thaner (Innsbruck 1906-15).- Bonizo, Liber de viia christiaua ed. E. Perels (Texte zur Geschichte des römischen und kanonischen Rechts im Mittelalter 1, Berlin 1930).-H. Breaslau, Handbuch der Urkunden- lehre (2nd ed. Leipzi~-_Berlin 1912-31; vol. Il, 2 ed. H. W. Klewitz).-H. Th. Bruns, Canones apostolorum et COlIClhoru7l&saeculorum IV.V.VI.VII. (Berlin 1839).-J. J. Christ, 'The Origin and Development of the Term "Title",' The Jurist 4 (1944) 101-23.-Deusd. _ Die Kanonessammlung des Kardinals Deusdedit ed. V. Wolf von GlanveII (Paderborn 1905).- Duchesne, LP: see LP.-V. Fuchs, Der Ordinationstitel von seiner Entstehung bis auf Ln- nozenz Ill. (Kanonistische Studien und Texte ed. M. Koeniger 4, Bonn 1930).-Gallia christiana in provincias dioiea edd. D. de Sainte-Marthe, B. Haurdau, P. Piolin et 11.1. (Paris 1715-1877).-A. Gaudenzi, 'Il monastero di Nonantola, il ducato di Persieeta e la Chiesa di Bologna,' Bulletino dell'Lsiituto storico italiano 36-7 (1916).-Gothofr.
    [Show full text]