Chapter 2 Technetium in Medicine 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Radioisotopes and Radiopharmaceuticals
RADIOISOTOPES AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS Radioisotopes are the unstable form of an element that emits radiation to become a more stable form — they have certain special attributes. These make radioisotopes useful in areas such as medicine, where they are used to develop radiopharmaceuticals, as well as many other industrial applications. THE PRODUCTION OF TECHNETIUM-99m RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS: ONE POSSIBLE ROUTE IRRADIATED U-235 99 TARGETS MO PROCESSING FACILITY HOSPITAL RADIOPHARMACY (MIXING WITH BIOLOGICAL MOLECULES THAT BIND AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS IN THE 99mTC IS IDEAL FOR DIAGNOSTICS BECAUSE OF BODY, SUPPORTING A WIDE ITS SHORT HALF-LIFE (6 HOURS) AND IDEAL GAMMA EMISSION RANGE OF MEDICAL NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS) REACTOR: 6 HOURS MAKES DISTRIBUTION DIFFICULT 99MO BULK LIQUID TARGET ITS PARENT NUCLIDE, MOLYBDENUM-99, IS PRODUCED; ITS HALF-LIFE (66 HOURS) MAKES 99 99m IRRADIATION IT SUITABLE FOR TRANSPORT MO/ TC GENERATORS 99MO/99mTC GENERATORS ARE PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE GLOBE 99MO/99TC GENERATOR MANUFACTURER Radioisotopes can occur naturally or be produced artificially, mainly in research reactors and accelerators. They are used in various fields, including nuclear medicine, where radiopharmaceuticals play a major role. Radiopharmaceuticals are substances that contain a radioisotope, and have properties that make them effective markers in medical diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. The chemical presence of radiopharmaceuticals can relay detailed information to medical professionals that can help in diagnoses and treatments. Eighty percent of all diagnostic medical scans worldwide use 99mTc, and its availability, at present, is dependent on the production of 99Mo in research reactors. Globally, the number of medical procedures involving the use of radioisotopes is growing, with an increasing emphasis on radionuclide therapy using radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of cancer.. -
OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE on HOSPITAL RADIOPHARMACY: a SAFE and EFFECTIVE APPROACH the Following States Are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency
OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE ON HOSPITAL RADIOPHARMACY: A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE APPROACH The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GUATEMALA PAKISTAN ALBANIA HAITI PALAU ALGERIA HOLY SEE PANAMA ANGOLA HONDURAS PARAGUAY ARGENTINA HUNGARY PERU ARMENIA ICELAND PHILIPPINES AUSTRALIA INDIA POLAND AUSTRIA INDONESIA PORTUGAL AZERBAIJAN IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF QATAR BANGLADESH IRAQ REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELARUS IRELAND ROMANIA BELGIUM ISRAEL RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELIZE ITALY SAUDI ARABIA BENIN JAMAICA SENEGAL BOLIVIA JAPAN SERBIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JORDAN SEYCHELLES BOTSWANA KAZAKHSTAN BRAZIL KENYA SIERRA LEONE BULGARIA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE BURKINA FASO KUWAIT SLOVAKIA CAMEROON KYRGYZSTAN SLOVENIA CANADA LATVIA SOUTH AFRICA CENTRAL AFRICAN LEBANON SPAIN REPUBLIC LIBERIA SRI LANKA CHAD LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SUDAN CHILE LIECHTENSTEIN SWEDEN CHINA LITHUANIA SWITZERLAND COLOMBIA LUXEMBOURG SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COSTA RICA MADAGASCAR TAJIKISTAN CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAWI THAILAND CROATIA MALAYSIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CUBA MALI REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CYPRUS MALTA TUNISIA CZECH REPUBLIC MARSHALL ISLANDS TURKEY DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC MAURITANIA UGANDA OF THE CONGO MAURITIUS UKRAINE DENMARK MEXICO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MONACO UNITED KINGDOM OF ECUADOR MONGOLIA GREAT BRITAIN AND EGYPT MONTENEGRO NORTHERN IRELAND EL SALVADOR MOROCCO ERITREA MOZAMBIQUE UNITED REPUBLIC ESTONIA MYANMAR OF TANZANIA ETHIOPIA NAMIBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FINLAND NEPAL URUGUAY FRANCE NETHERLANDS UZBEKISTAN GABON NEW ZEALAND VENEZUELA GEORGIA NICARAGUA VIETNAM GERMANY NIGER YEMEN GHANA NIGERIA ZAMBIA GREECE NORWAY ZIMBABWE The Agency’s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. -
Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines Positron Emission Testing, Other PET Applications, Including Oncologic Tumor Imaging Effective Date: April 21, 2014
Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines Positron Emission Testing, Other PET Applications, including Oncologic Tumor Imaging Effective Date: April 21, 2014 Proprietary and Confidential Date of Origin: 03/30/2005 Last reviewed: 11/14/2013 Last revised: 01/15/2013 Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines 8600 W Bryn Mawr Avenue South Tower - Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60631 P. 773.864.4600 Copyright © 2014. AIM Specialty Health. All Rights Reserved www.aimspecialtyhealth.com Table of Contents Administrative Guideline ..........................................................................................................3 Disclaimer ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Use of AIM’s Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines..........................................................................................................4 Multiple Simultaneous Imaging Requests ..............................................................................................................5 General Imaging Considerations ............................................................................................................................6 PET - Other PET Applications, Including Oncologic Tumor Imaging ......................................8 PET Bibliography ....................................................................................................................12 Table of Contents | Copyright © 2014. AIM Specialty Health. All Rights Reserved. -
USAN Naming Guidelines for Monoclonal Antibodies |
Monoclonal Antibodies In October 2008, the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Working Group Meeting on Nomenclature for Monoclonal Antibodies (mAb) met to review and streamline the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme. Based on the group's recommendations and further discussions, the INN Experts published changes to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme. In 2011, the INN Experts published an updated "International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Biological and Biotechnological Substances—A Review" (PDF) with revisions to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme language. The USAN Council has modified its own scheme to facilitate international harmonization. This page outlines the updated scheme and supersedes previous schemes. It also explains policies regarding post-translational modifications and the use of 2-word names. The council has no plans to retroactively change names already coined. They believe that changing names of monoclonal antibodies would confuse physicians, other health care professionals and patients. Manufacturers should be aware that nomenclature practices are continually evolving. Consequently, further updates may occur any time the council believes changes are necessary. Changes to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme, however, should be carefully considered and implemented only when necessary. Elements of a Name The suffix "-mab" is used for monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments and radiolabeled antibodies. For polyclonal mixtures of antibodies, "-pab" is used. The -pab suffix applies to polyclonal pools of recombinant monoclonal antibodies, as opposed to polyclonal antibody preparations isolated from blood. It differentiates polyclonal antibodies from individual monoclonal antibodies named with -mab. Sequence of Stems and Infixes The order for combining the key elements of a monoclonal antibody name is as follows: 1. -
Challenges and Approaches for the Development of Safer Immunomodulatory Biologics
REVIEWS Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics Jean G. Sathish1*, Swaminathan Sethu1*, Marie-Christine Bielsky2, Lolke de Haan3, Neil S. French1, Karthik Govindappa1, James Green4, Christopher E. M. Griffiths5, Stephen Holgate6, David Jones2, Ian Kimber7, Jonathan Moggs8, Dean J. Naisbitt1, Munir Pirmohamed1, Gabriele Reichmann9, Jennifer Sims10, Meena Subramanyam11, Marque D. Todd12, Jan Willem Van Der Laan13, Richard J. Weaver14 and B. Kevin Park1 Abstract | Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions — including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity — pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics. Immunomodulatory Biologics currently represent more than 30% of licensed The high specificity of the interactions of immu- biologics pharmaceutical products and have expanded the thera- nomodulatory biologics with their relevant immune Biotechnology-derived peutic options available -
New Biological Therapies: Introduction to the Basis of the Risk of Infection
New biological therapies: introduction to the basis of the risk of infection Mario FERNÁNDEZ RUIZ, MD, PhD Unit of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre”, Madrid ESCMIDInstituto de Investigación eLibraryHospital “12 de Octubre” (i+12) © by author Transparency Declaration Over the last 24 months I have received honoraria for talks on behalf of • Astellas Pharma • Gillead Sciences • Roche • Sanofi • Qiagen Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Paul Ehrlich (1854-1915) • “side-chain” theory (1897) • receptor-ligand concept (1900) • “magic bullet” theory • foundation for specific chemotherapy (1906) • Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine (1908) (together with Metchnikoff) Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author 1981: B-1 antibody (tositumomab) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody 1997: FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20-positive NHL 2001: FDA approval of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia Infections and biologicals: a real concern? (two-hour symposium): New biological therapies: introduction to the ESCMIDbasis of the risk of infection eLibrary © by author Functional classification of targeted (biological) agents • Agents targeting soluble immune effector molecules • Agents targeting cell surface receptors -
Study Protocol
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Coordinating Investigator Study site(s) and number of subjects planned Approximately 450 subjects are planned at approximately 173 sites. Study period Phase of development Estimated date of first subject enrolled Q2 2015 3 Estimated date of last subject completed Q2 2018 Study design This is a Phase 3, multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intravenous treatment regimen of anifrolumab (150 mg or 300 mg) versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) while receiving standard of care (SOC) treatment. The study will be performed in adult subjects aged 18 to 70 years of age. Approximately 450 subjects receiving SOC treatment will be randomised in a 1:2:2 ratio to receive a fixed intravenous dose of 150 mg anifrolumab, 300 mg anifrolumab, or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for a total of 13 doses (Week 0 to Week 48), with the primary endpoint evaluated at the Week 52 visit. Investigational product will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion via an infusion pump over a minimum of 30 minutes, Q4W. Subjects must be taking either 1 or any combination of the following: oral corticosteroids (OCS), antimalarial, and/or immunosuppressants. Randomisation will be stratified using the following factors: SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score at screening (<10 points versus ≥10 points); Week 0 (Day 1) OCS dose 2(125) Revised Clinical Study Protocol Drug Substance Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) Study Code D3461C00005 Edition Number 5 Date 18 May 2016 (<10 mg/day versus ≥10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent); and results of a type 1 interferon (IFN) test (high versus low). -
Monoclonal Antibody Playbook
Federal Response to COVID-19: Monoclonal Antibody Clinical Implementation Guide Outpatient administration guide for healthcare providers 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 1 Introduction to COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy 2 Overview of Emergency Use Authorizations 3 Site and Patient Logistics Site preparation Patient pathways to monoclonal administration 4 Team Roles and Responsibilities Leadership Administrative Clinical Table of 5 Monoclonal Antibody Indications and Administration Indications Contents Preparation Administration Response to adverse events 6 Supplies and Resources Infrastructure Administrative Patient Intake Administration 7 Examples: Sites of Administration and Staffing Patterns 8 Additional Resources 1 1. Introduction to Monoclonal Therapy 2 As of 08/13/21 Summary of COVID-19 Therapeutics 1 • No Illness . Health, no infections • Exposed Asymptomatic Infected . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, no limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for post-exposure prophylaxis (Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN)) – EUA Issued. • Early Symptomatic . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, with limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for treatment (EUA issued): Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab1 (Lilly) Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN) Sotrovimab (GSK/Vir) • Hospital Adminission. Treated with Remdesivir (FDA Approved) or Tocilizumab (EUA Issued) . Hospitalized, no acute medical problems . Hospitalized, not on oxygen . Hospitlaized, on oxygen • ICU Admission . Hospitalized, high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation -
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 9, 2017 (February 9, 2017) REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) New York 000-19034 13-3444607 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of Incorporation) File No.) Identification No.) 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591-6707 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (914) 847-7000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 9, 2017, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial and operating results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2016. A copy of the press release is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference to this Item 2.02. -
The Future of Antibodies As Cancer Drugs
REVIEWS Drug Discovery Today Volume 17, Numbers 17/18 September 2012 The biopharmaceutical industry’s pipeline of anticancer antibodies includes 165 candidates with substantial diversity in composition, targets and mechanisms of action that hold promise to be the cancer drugs of the future. Reviews FOUNDATION REVIEW Foundation review: The future of antibodies as cancer drugs 1 2 Dr Janice Reichert Janice M. Reichert and Eugen Dhimolea is Research Assistant Professor at Tufts 1 Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University School of Medicine, 75 Kneeland Street, University’s Center for the Study of Drug Development Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02111, USA 2 (CSDD). She is also Founder Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, 77 Louis Pasteur Ave., and Editor-in-Chief of mAbs, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, Room 309, Boston, MA 02215, USA a peer-reviewed, PubMed- indexed biomedical journal that focuses on topics relevant to antibody research Targeted therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have proven and development; President of the board of directors of The Antibody Society; and a member of the board successful as cancer drugs. To profile products that could be marketed in of the Peptide Therapeutics Foundation. At CSDD, the future, we examined the current commercial clinical pipeline of mAb Dr Reichert studies innovation in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Her work focuses on candidates for cancer. Our analysis revealed trends toward development of strategic analyses of investigational candidates and marketed products, with an emphasis on the clinical a variety of noncanonical mAbs, including antibody–drug conjugates development and approval of new therapeutics and (ADCs), bispecific antibodies, engineered antibodies and antibody vaccines. -
Test–Retest Variability of Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Binding Measured with Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Altanserin in the Human Brain
SYNAPSE 30:380–392 (1998) Test–Retest Variability of Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Binding Measured With Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Altanserin in the Human Brain GWENN S. SMITH,1,2* JULIE C. PRICE,2 BRIAN J. LOPRESTI,2 YIYUN HUANG,2 NORMAN SIMPSON,2 DANIEL HOLT,2 N. SCOTT MASON,2 CAROLYN CIDIS MELTZER,1,2 ROBERT A. SWEET,1 THOMAS NICHOLS,2 DONALD SASHIN,2 AND CHESTER A. MATHIS2 1Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania KEY WORDS positron emission tomography (PET); serotonin receptor; 5-HT2A; imaging ABSTRACT The role of serotonin in CNS function and in many neuropsychiatric diseases (e.g., schizophrenia, affective disorders, degenerative dementias) support the development of a reliable measure of serotonin receptor binding in vivo in human subjects. To this end, the regional distribution and intrasubject test–retest variability of the binding of [18F]altanserin were measured as important steps in the further development of [18F]altanserin as a radiotracer for positron emission tomography (PET) 18 studies of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. Two high specific activity [ F]altanserin PET studies were performed in normal control subjects (n ϭ 8) on two separate days (2–16 days apart). Regional specific binding was assessed by distribution volume (DV), estimates that were derived using a conventional four compartment (4C) model, and the Logan graphical analysis method. For both analysis methods, levels of [18F]altanserin binding were highest in cortical areas, lower in the striatum and thalamus, and lowest in the cerebellum. -
Current Status and Growth of Nuclear Theranostics in Singapore
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2019) 53:96–101 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00580-3 PERSPECTIVE ISSN (print) 1869-3482 ISSN (online) 1869-3474 Current Status and Growth of Nuclear Theranostics in Singapore Hian Liang Huang1,2 & Aaron Kian Ti Tong1,2 & Sue Ping Thang1,2 & Sean Xuexian Yan1,2 & Winnie Wing Chuen Lam1,2 & Kelvin Siu Hoong Loke1,2 & Charlene Yu Lin Tang1 & Lenith Tai Jit Cheng1 & Gideon Su Kai Ooi1 & Han Chung Low1 & Butch Maulion Magsombol1 & Wei Ying Tham1,2 & Charles Xian Yang Goh 1,2 & Colin Jingxian Tan 1 & Yiu Ming Khor1,2 & Sumbul Zaheer1,2 & Pushan Bharadwaj1,2 & Wanying Xie1,2 & David Chee Eng Ng1,2 Received: 3 January 2019 /Revised: 13 January 2019 /Accepted: 14 January 2019 /Published online: 25 January 2019 # Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019 Abstract The concept of theranostics, where individual patient-level biological information is used to choose the optimal therapy for that individual, has become more popular in the modern era of ‘personalised’ medicine. With the growth of theranostics, nuclear medicine as a specialty is uniquely poised to grow along with the ever-increasing number of concepts combining imaging and therapy. This special report summarises the status and growth of Theranostic Nuclear Medicine in Singapore. We will cover our experience with the use of radioiodine, radioiodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, prostate specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy, radium-223 and yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy. We also include a section on our radiopharmacy laboratory, crucial to our implementation of theranostic principles. Radionuclide theranostics has seen tremendous growth and we hope to be able to grow alongside to continue to serve the patients in Singapore and in the region.