DOCSLIB.ORG

Kerameikos, Which Are Under the Authority of the 3Rd Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, As Well As the National Archaeological Museum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kerameikos, Which Are Under the Authority of the 3Rd Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, As Well As the National Archaeological Museum 70 7 70 70 70 70 7 70 7 70 7 70 70 70 70 70 70 7 70 − −−− − − − −−− −−− − − − − −−− − − −−−−−−− − − − − −−− −−−− −−− − − − −−− − −−− −−−− − − − −−−−−−−−−−−−−−7−−−−−−−− − − − −−− − − −−−−−−−− − − − − −−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−− − − − − − − −−−−−−−−−− − − − − − −−− − − − −−−−−−−−−−−− − − − − − − − −−−−−−−−−−−− − − − − −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−7 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− − − −− − − − − −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− − − − −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−3−−−−−−−−−−− −−− − −−−−−−−−−−− −−− − −−−−−−−− − − − − − − − − − −− − − − − − −−7 − −−−−− − − − − − −−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−− − − − − −−−−−−− − − − − − − −−−−−−−− Kοινωφελές Ίδρυµα Ιωάννη Σ Λάτση ΚΕRΑΜΕΙΚΟS COPYRIGHT NOTICE © COPYRIGHT of antiquities and photographs: Τhis book includes photographs of monuments and exhibits from the ar- chaeological site and the museum of Kerameikos, which are under the authority of the 3rd Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, as well as the National Archaeological Museum. The Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports has the copyright of the photographs of antiquities and of the actual antiquities that comprise the visual content of the photographs. The Archaeological Receipts Fund of Greece receives all fees for the publication of photographs bearing the Ministry’s copyright (Law 3028/2002). The Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports remains exclusively competent to grant to any third party permission to use the photographs. © COPYRIGHT of texts: Eleni S. Banou, Leonidas K. Bournias. © COPYRIGHT of publication: John S. Latsis Public Benefit Foundation, 2014. Any reprint, republication or reproduction, in whole or in part, of the texts and photographs of this edition is prohibited (Law 2121/1993). ISBN 978-960-98364-8-7 ELENI S. BANOU - LEONIDAS K. BOURNIAS CONTENTS Foreword by the Minister of Culture and Sports ❧ 11 Foreword by Marianna J. Latsis ❧ 13 Authors’ Foreword ❧ 15 “THE MOST BEAUTIFUL SUBURB” ❧ Terrain, 17˙ The Eridanos – a marshlands habitat, 18 ExCAvATION HISTORY ❧ The Archaeological Society, 20˙ The German Archaeological Institute, 24˙ History of the Museum, 25˙ Ministry of Culture and Sports – Third Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, 25 THE KERAMEIKOS DOWN TO THE PERSIAN WARS ❧ Facing West, 29˙ Mycenaean period, 29˙ The synoe- cism, 30˙ The beginnings of a demos, 36˙ The creation of a unique tectonic style, 48˙ Renaissance, 58 TOWARDS THE GREEK MIRACLE ❧ Archaic graves, 116˙ Tritopatreion, 165 THE PERIOD OF DEMOCRACY ❧ The Kerameikos section of the wall and its history, 174˙ Construction phases of the gates, 182˙ The Dipylon, 182˙ The Sacred Gate - Eridanos, 184 THE ExTRAMURAL AREA [OUTER KERAMEIKOS] ❧ The cemetery, 188˙ The most important funeral monuments of the 5th and 4th centuries BC, 199 (Sacred Way, 199˙ Street of Tombs, 200˙ South Road, 240˙ Dromos, 243)˙ Demosion Sema, 247˙ Sanctuaries, 248˙ Workshops, 266 THE AREA INSIDE THE WALLS (INNER KERAMEIKOS) ❧ Pompeion, 272˙ Fountain house, 276˙ Altar, 276˙ Building Ζ, 277˙ Buildings Y and x, 279 KERAMEIKOS: THE OFFICIAL CEMETERY ❧ Ostracism, 287˙ Celebrations for the living (Great Pana- thenaea, 287)˙ Celebrations for the dead (Anthesteria, 294˙ Skirophoria, 295)˙ “Undying fame”, 315 BIBLIOGRAPHY 325 ARCHIvAL PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS 328 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 329 ODAY THE KERAMEIKOS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE is marked off by Ermou, Piraeus, and Aso- Tmaton Streets. Thanks to new research, its current area will be expanded and its loamy soil will give rise to new testimony regarding both its elaborate necropolis and the notable art of pottery which once flourished in this area of the Asty situated along the banks of the Eridanos. But Kerameikos, this once-great Attic deme on the northwest outskirts of Athens, was not only the location of the most important historical cemetery between Prehistoric and Byzantine times and the major production site for Attica’s renowned vases. It is also the place that confirms and conveys what- ever is loftiest and whatever basest, the apogee and simultaneously the waning of Athens’ golden age. Pericles delivered his Funeral Oration, which encapsulates in unparalleled fashion the preem- inence of the Athenian democracy, in the Kerameikos, on “an elevated platform in order to be heard by as many of the crowd as possible” along the road leading from the Dipylon to the Academy. There in the Kerameikos, in “the city’s most beautiful suburb” as acknowledged by Thucy- dides himself—who it may be noted makes reference at no other point to the natural beauty of a place—near the Dipylon in front of the Pompeion was the starting-point for the festival of the Great Panathenaea, in which the goddess Athena’s new peplos was transported to the Acropolis. This pro- cession acquired eternal youth on the Parthenon frieze, part of an unsurpassed age of artistic creativity and an era in which man succeeded in giving the most faithful possible substantive form to his soul’s beauty. However, the soil of the Kerameikos once concealed—though no longer—the underside of Athens political and religious greatness, the main cause of its decline, the tool of slander and defama- tion: thousands of ostraka bearing the name of Themistocles, whom his political opponents, the Aeacids and the Alcmaeonids, ostracized in 471 BC. German archaeologists found around 9500 os- traka in the Kerameikos; many bore the name of Themistocles, fewer that of Cimon… 10 According to the great Swiss philosopher of history Jacob Burckhardt (1818-1897), it was calumny, infamous slander, that all-powerful weapon in the hands of demagogues which inter alia brought about Athens’ decline: “The degeneration of Athens stemmed from the attempt by a dem- ocratic state to establish an imperium, and from the exploitation of this attempt by demagogues. This was the source of all ills and all misfortunes”. Even Themistocles, a ruler who demonstrably knew how to measure the resistance of the human material he was called upon to govern—he evolved like a virtuoso when he had first to con- quer the misapprehensions within the minds of the Athenians before defeating the Persians at sea— was defeated by the bottomless pit of abuse. The Kerameikos thus sums up all that was important about Athens: “the praises of the Demos and the Sophists, the difficult, invaluable ‘well done’” as well as “the mean observances, littlenesses, and indifference” that brought men like Cleon to power. This is the Kerameikos revealed in this high-quality edition, the fruitful partnership of two distinguished public servants-archaeologists and the John S. Latsis Foundation, which in continuing its valuable series “The Museums Cycle” is now offering Greece a valuable legacy of history and knowledge. I extend my warm thanks and congratulations to the John S. Latsis Public Benefit Foundation for this continuous and excellent offering, as well as to the volume’s authors, archaeologists Eleni Banou, Director of the 3rd Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, and Leonidas Bournias of the same ephorate. KONSTANTINOS AN. TASOULAS Minister of Culture and Sports 11 ΗΕ JOURNEY of "The Museums Cycle" within historic spaces that showcase the civilization of ΤAncient Greece has continued steadfastly for fourteen years. This year, our sojourn will be in Ke- rameikos. A perennial, vibrant nexus, Kerameikos, in addition to containing the cemetery of ancient Athens, was the starting point for the Panathenaiac procession, the glorious celebration of Athens in antiquity, while the place name was to become synonymous with an entire art form, that of ceramics. The museum and the archaeological site of Kerameikos are not particularly well known to the ge- neral public. The John S. Latsis Public Benefit Foundation is endeavoring through this publication to illuminate its history and encourage numerous visits, both physical and digital, to a place that ra- diates the grandeur and timelessness of ancient Greek civilization. Cemeteries have always been a precious source of knowledge for scholars concerning the cul- ture and daily life in times past. But Kerameikos is not just this: it is an alfresco art gallery, a veri- table garden in the alcoves and bowers of which, amidst flourishing olive, laurel, and cypress trees, carved masterpieces stand. Here beneath the Attic sky, mourning and grief gave way to high art, while the souls of eminent men and women, heroes and famed athletes, gave rise to marble sculptures recounting their exploits, feats, and dramas. Each monument and stone echo unique moments in the city’s past and the prominent denizens who passed through it. Strolling through the center of Athens, it is truly worthwhile to spend some time in Keramei- kos, treating it not simply as an archaeological site, but as a living and venerable part of the city. It is an unexpected cultural and historical interlude amidst the rush of our daily lives where one can stand beside the tombstones, themselves works of art, feel the breeze and fragrances of each passing season, walk amongst the traces of ancient roads and discover one’s own corner that will provide peace and tranquility. On behalf of the John S. Latsis Public Benefit Foundation, I would like to thank both estima- ble writers, the archaeologists Eleni Banou and Leonidas Bournias, whose impeccable text conveys profound knowledge and love for these historic places and their past. I also extend my thanks to all the Kerameikos employees, who made every effort towards creating this publication. Our thanks also go to the Ministry of Culture and Sports for the constant support and trust that pervades each new tome of "The Museums Cycle",
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Geometric Cemetery on the Areopagus: 1897, 1932, 1947*
    A GEOMETRIC CEMETERY ON THE AREOPAGUS: 1897, 1932, 1947* with Appendices on the Geometric Graves found in the Dorpfeld Excavations on the Acropolis West Slope in 1895 and on Hadrian Street ("Phinopoulos' Lot") in 1898 (PLATES 65-80) I. Introduction and the Problem a. The D6rpfeld Excavations p. 325 b. The Agora Excavations and the Search p. 327 c. Disiecta Membra p. 328 II. The Areopagus Cemetery a. General Remarks and Conclusions p. 329 b. Catalogue of Graves and Finds p. 334 Appendix A: Sources for the D6rpfeld Geometric Graves p. 365 Appendix B: The Two Geometric Graves on the Acropolis West Slope: 1895 p. 372 Appendix C: Two Geometric Graves in Phinopoulos' Lot at No. 3, Hadrian Street: 1898 p. 374 Appendix D: A Note on Poulsen's "Akropolisvasen" p. 385 Appendix E: List of Known Finds from the D6rpfeld Geometric Graves p. 387 Appendix F: The Submycenaean Child's Grave South of the Amyneion: 1892 p. 389 I. INTRODUCTION AND THE PROBLEM' A. THE DORPFELD EXCAVATIONS For seven seasons between 1892 and 1899 the German Archaeological Institute, under the general supervision of Wilhelm Dorpfeld, carried out regular excavations in * Professor Penuel P. Kahane died suddenly on February 13, 1974 in Basel. This paper is dedicated to his memory. 1 I am deeply grateful to Professor Homer A. Thompson and to the American School of Classical Studies for the opportunity to study the Agora material; to the German Archaeological Institute in Athens and to Professor Emil Kunze for permission to use the Daybook material; to Dr. Ulf Jantzen for permission to publish the vases in the Institute, and to reproduce the photographs from the Photoabteilung; and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Town Address Postcode Telephone Etoloakarnania Agrinio
    Department Town Address Postcode Telephone Etoloakarnania Agrinio 1, Eirinis square, Dimitrakaki street 301 00 2641046346 Etoloakarnania Mesologgi 45, Charilaou Trikoupi street 302 00 2631022487 Etoloakarnania Nafpaktos 1, Athinon street 303 00 2634038210 Etoloakarnania Amfilohia Vasileos Karapanou street 305 00 2642023302 Argolida Argos 12, Danaou street 212 00 2751069042 Argolida Nafplio 35, Argous street 211 00 2752096478 Argolida Porto Heli Porto Heli Argolidas 210 61 2754052102 Arkardia Megalopoli 15, Kolokotroni street 222 00 2791021131 Arkardia Tripoli 48, Ethinikis Antistaseos street 221 00 2710243770 Arta Arta 129, Skoufa street 471 00 2681077020 Attica Athens 316, Acharnon street & 26 Atlantos street 112 52 2102930333 Attica Agios Dimitrios 54, Agiou Dimitriou street 173 41 2109753953 Attica Agios Dimitrios 276, Vouliagmenis avenue 173 43 2109818908 Attica Agios Dimitrios 9 - 11, Agiou Dimitriou street 173 43 2109764322 Attica Agia Paraskevi 429, Mesogeion avenue 153 43 2106006242 Attica Athens - Piraeus 153, Piraeus Avenue 118 53 2104815333 Attica Athens - Aristeidou 1, Aristeidou street 105 59 2103227778 Attica Athens 79, Alexandras avenue 114 74 2106426650 Attica Athens - Plateia Viktorias 2, Victoria square 104 34 2108220800 Attica Athens - Stadiou 7, Stadiou street 105 62 2103316892 Attica Egaleo 266, Iera Odos street 122 42 2105316671 126, Vasilissis Sofias street & 2, Feidippidou Attica Abelokipoi street 115 27 2106461200 Attica Amfiali 32, Pavlou Fissa street 187 57 2104324300 Attica Palaio Faliro 82, Amfitheas avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon
    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Art of Byzantium from Greek Collections October 6, 2013 - March 2, 2014
    Updated Tuesday, December 31, 2013 | 1:38:43 PM Last updated Tuesday, December 31, 2013 Updated Tuesday, December 31, 2013 | 1:38:43 PM National Gallery of Art, Press Office 202.842.6353 fax: 202.789.3044 National Gallery of Art, Press Office 202.842.6353 fax: 202.789.3044 Heaven and Earth: Art of Byzantium from Greek Collections October 6, 2013 - March 2, 2014 To order publicity images: Publicity images are available only for those objects accompanied by a thumbnail image below. Please email [email protected] or fax (202) 789-3044 and designate your desired images, using the “File Name” on this list. Please include your name and contact information, press affiliation, deadline for receiving images, the date of publication, and a brief description of the kind of press coverage planned. Links to download the digital image files will be sent via e-mail. Usage: Images are provided exclusively to the press, and only for purposes of publicity for the duration of the exhibition at the National Gallery of Art. All published images must be accompanied by the credit line provided and with copyright information, as noted. Important: The images displayed on this page are for reference only and are not to be reproduced in any media. Cat. No. 1A / File Name: 3514-117.jpg Statuette of Europa, 1st or early 2nd century marble height: 34.5 cm (13 9/16 in.) Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth Cat. No. 1B / File Name: 3514-118.jpg Head of Pan, 2nd century (?) marble height: 14.4 cm (5 11/16 in.) Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Resounding Mysteries: Sound and Silence in the Eleusinian Soundscape
    Body bar (print) issn 2057–5823 and bar (online) issn 2057–5831 Religion Article Resounding mysteries: sound and silence in the Eleusinian soundscape Georgia Petridou Abstract The term ‘soundscape’, as coined by the Canadian composer R. Murray Schafer at the end of the 1960s, refers to the part of the acoustic environment that is per- ceivable by humans. This study attempts to reconstruct roughly the Eleusinian ‘soundscape’ (the words and the sounds made and heard, and those others who remained unheard) as participants in the Great Mysteries of the two Goddesses may have perceived it in the Classical and post-Classical periods. Unlike other mystery cults (e.g. the Cult of Cybele and Attis) whose soundscapes have been meticulously investigated, the soundscape of Eleusis has received relatively little attention, since the visual aspect of the Megala Mysteria of Demeter and Kore has for decades monopolised the scholarly attention. This study aims at putting things right on this front, and simultaneously look closely at the relational dynamic of the acoustic segment of Eleusis as it can be surmised from the work of well-known orators and philosophers of the first and second centuries ce. Keywords: Demeter; Eleusis; Kore; mysteries; silence; sound; soundscape Affiliation University of Liverpool, UK. email: [email protected] bar vol 2.1 2018 68–87 doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.36485 ©2018, equinox publishing RESOUNDING MYSTERIES: SOUND AND SILENCE IN THE ELEUSINIAN SOUNDSCAPE 69 Sound, like breath, is experienced as a movement of coming and going, inspiration and expiration. If that is so, then we should say of the body, as it sings, hums, whistles or speaks, that it is ensounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • See Attachment
    T able of Contents Welcome Address ................................................................................4 Committees ............................................................................................5 10 reasons why you should meet in Athens....................................6 General Information ............................................................................7 Registration............................................................................................11 Abstract Submission ............................................................................12 Social Functions....................................................................................13 Preliminary Scientific Program - Session Topics ..........................14 Preliminary List of Faculty..................................................................15 Hotel Accommodation..........................................................................17 Hotels Description ................................................................................18 Optional Tours........................................................................................21 Pre & Post Congress Tours ................................................................24 Important Dates & Deadlines ............................................................26 3 W elcome Address Dear Colleagues, You are cordially invited to attend the 28th Politzer Society Meeting in Athens. This meeting promises to be one of the world’s largest gatherings of Otologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Greek Art 1St Edition
    GREEK ART 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nigel Spivey | 9780714833682 | | | | | Greek Art 1st edition PDF Book No Date pp. Fresco of an ancient Macedonian soldier thorakitai wearing chainmail armor and bearing a thureos shield, 3rd century BC. This work is a splendid survey of all the significant artistic monuments of the Greek world that have come down to us. They sometimes had a second story, but very rarely basements. Inscription to ffep, else clean and bright, inside and out. The Erechtheum , next to the Parthenon, however, is Ionic. Well into the 19th century, the classical tradition derived from Greece dominated the art of the western world. The Moschophoros or calf-bearer, c. Red-figure vases slowly replaced the black-figure style. Some of the best surviving Hellenistic buildings, such as the Library of Celsus , can be seen in Turkey , at cities such as Ephesus and Pergamum. The Distaff Side: Representing…. Chryselephantine Statuary in the Ancient Mediterranean World. The Greeks were quick to challenge Publishers, New York He and other potters around his time began to introduce very stylised silhouette figures of humans and animals, especially horses. Add to Basket Used Hardcover Condition: g to vg. The paint was frequently limited to parts depicting clothing, hair, and so on, with the skin left in the natural color of the stone or bronze, but it could also cover sculptures in their totality; female skin in marble tended to be uncoloured, while male skin might be a light brown. After about BC, figures, such as these, both male and female, wore the so-called archaic smile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed As the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon
    The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed as the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon By Brian A. Sprague Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor Bau-Hwa Hsieh Western Oregon University Thursday, June 07, 2007 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Narasingha Sil Copyright © Brian A. Sprague 2007 The Parthenon frieze has been the subject of many debates and the interpretation of it leads to a number of problems: what was the subject of the frieze? What would the frieze have meant to the Athenian audience? The Parthenon scenes have been identified in many different ways: a representation of the Panathenaic festival, a mythical or historical event, or an assertion of Athenian ideology. This paper will examine the Parthenon Frieze in relation to the metopes, pediments, and statues in order to prove the validity of the suggestion that it depicts the Panathenaic festival just preceding the battle of Marathon in 490 BC. The main problems with this topic are that there are no primary sources that document what the Frieze was supposed to mean. The scenes are not specific to any one type of procession. The argument against a Panathenaic festival is that there are soldiers and chariots represented. Possibly that biggest problem with interpreting the Frieze is that part of it is missing and it could be that the piece that is missing ties everything together. The Parthenon may have been the only ancient Greek temple with an exterior sculpture that depicts any kind of religious ritual or service. Because the theme of the frieze is unique we can not turn towards other relief sculpture to help us understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • Parthenon 1 Parthenon
    Parthenon 1 Parthenon Parthenon Παρθενών (Greek) The Parthenon Location within Greece Athens central General information Type Greek Temple Architectural style Classical Location Athens, Greece Coordinates 37°58′12.9″N 23°43′20.89″E Current tenants Museum [1] [2] Construction started 447 BC [1] [2] Completed 432 BC Height 13.72 m (45.0 ft) Technical details Size 69.5 by 30.9 m (228 by 101 ft) Other dimensions Cella: 29.8 by 19.2 m (98 by 63 ft) Design and construction Owner Greek government Architect Iktinos, Kallikrates Other designers Phidias (sculptor) The Parthenon (Ancient Greek: Παρθενών) is a temple on the Athenian Acropolis, Greece, dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena, whom the people of Athens considered their patron. Its construction began in 447 BC and was completed in 438 BC, although decorations of the Parthenon continued until 432 BC. It is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered to be the culmination of the development of the Doric order. Its decorative sculptures are considered some of the high points of Greek art. The Parthenon is regarded as an Parthenon 2 enduring symbol of Ancient Greece and of Athenian democracy and one of the world's greatest cultural monuments. The Greek Ministry of Culture is currently carrying out a program of selective restoration and reconstruction to ensure the stability of the partially ruined structure.[3] The Parthenon itself replaced an older temple of Athena, which historians call the Pre-Parthenon or Older Parthenon, that was destroyed in the Persian invasion of 480 BC. Like most Greek temples, the Parthenon was used as a treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art Bulletin
    THE ART BULLETIN A Quarterly Published by . the College Art Association September 2009 Volume XCI Number 3 Destruction and Memory on the Athenian Acropolis Rachel Kousser The Parthenon, constructed betl-veen 447 and 432 BCE on This analysis of the Parthenon and its antecedents has also the Athenian Acropolis, stands as the most lavish, technically a broader significance as part of the history of Orientalism, a refined, and programmatically cohesive temple on the Greek topic of much recen t interest for scholars of Classical Greece. mainland, a fitting commemoration of the Athenians' spec­ Philologists have researched the use of Orien talist tropes in tacular and unexpected victories in the Persian ''''ars (Fig. 1). various literary genres,5 while art historians have analyzed The immense, all-marble structure was designed around a snch topics as the depiction of Persians in Greek art,G the colossal statue of Athena Parthenos, depicted by the sculptor reception of Achaemenid material culture in Athens,? and Pheidias fully armed, and with an image of the goddess of representations of the Persian Wars in public Athenian mon­ victory, Nike, alighting on her left hand (Fig, 2). In its archi­ uments.s One hitherto neglected area of inquiry has been the tectural sculpture as well, the Parthenon repeatedly alluded interconnections betl-veen Orientalism and iconoclasm. The to the Greeks' struggle again-st the Persians, for instance, destruction of an enemy's sanctuaries was commonplace in through famous mytholOgical contests: battles between men ancient warfare, and had been practiced by Greeks as well as and centaurs, Athenians and Amazons, Greeks and Trojans, Persians.
    [Show full text]