DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN Prepared by Buckeye Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Prepared for: City of Buckeye Engineering Department 530 E. Monroe Avenue Buckeye, AZ 85326 Submitted by: Matrix Design Group 2020 North Central Avenue, Suite 1140 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Harrington Planning + Design 1921 S. Alma School Road, Suite 204 Mesa, AZ 85210 United Civil Group 2803 North 7th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85007 September 2019 Page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Plan Development ................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Plan Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 1-3 Planning Process .............................................................................................................................................. 1-3 Vision and Goals .............................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Project Management and Public Engagement ......................................................................................... 1-5 Chapter 2 Facts, Trends, and Benefits ...................................................................................... 2-1 Benefits of Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel .................................................................................................... 2-1 Perception of Safety ........................................................................................................................................ 2-2 Level of Traffic Stress ........................................................................................................................................ 2-4 Chapter 3 Plan Influences ......................................................................................................... 3-1 Relevant Plans and Studies ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 Planned Land Uses .......................................................................................................................................... 3-6 Buckeye Demographic Profile ..................................................................................................................... 3-10 Corridor Opportunities .................................................................................................................................. 3-11 Trip Generators ............................................................................................................................................... 3-14 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network ................................................................................................... 3-17 Existing Trail Network ...................................................................................................................................... 3-19 Crash Locations…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3-21 Chapter 4 The Plan ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 On-Street Arterial and Collector Networks .................................................................................................. 4-1 On-Street Cross Sections ................................................................................................................................. 4-4 Off-Street Paths and Trails Network ............................................................................................................. 4-10 Off-Street Path Cross Sections...................................................................................................................... 4-10 Support Facilities Strategy Toolbox ............................................................................................................. 4-14 Chapter 5 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................... 5-1 Funding Sources and Partners ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 Short, Mid, and Long-Term Improvements ................................................................................................... 5-3 Opportunities for Cooperative Planning .................................................................................................... 5-15 Six E’s .............................................................................................................................................................. 5-17 Programs ......................................................................................................................................................... 5-17 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................ A-1 | i Figures 1-1 Buckeye BPMP Study Area ................................................................................................................ 1-2 2-1 Four Types of Transportation Cyclists ................................................................................................ 2-4 3-1 Future Street Network ......................................................................................................................... 3-3 3-2 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, Future Land Use ................................................................ 3-7 3-3 Imagine Buckeye 2040 General Plan, Approved Master Planned Communities and Area Plans .................................................................................................................................... 3-9 3-4 Buckeye Age Distribution, 2017 ...................................................................................................... 3-10 3-5 Wildlife Linkage Option 1 & Option 2……………………………………………………………...….3-12 3-6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Trip Generators ........................................................................................ 3-16 3-7 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network ....................................................................................... 3-18 3-8 Maricopa Trail .................................................................................................................................... 3-20 3-9 Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Sites in the City of Buckeye – January 2012 through July 2018...................................................................................................... 3-22 4-1 On-Street - Arterial Network ............................................................................................................... 4-2 4-2 On-Street - Collector Network ........................................................................................................... 4-3 4-3 Parkway Cross Section ....................................................................................................................... 4-4 4-4 Arterial Street Cross Section (140 feet ROW) .................................................................................. 4-5 4-5 Arterial Street Cross Section (120 feet ROW) .................................................................................. 4-5 4-6 Collector Street Cross Section ........................................................................................................... 4-6 4-7 Major Collector Street Cross Section ............................................................................................... 4-6 4-8 Local Street Cross Section ................................................................................................................. 4-7 4-9 Existing and Potential Bike Routes .................................................................................................... 4-9 4-10 Primary Path Cross Section .............................................................................................................. 4-10 4-11 Off-Street Paths and Trail Network .................................................................................................. 4-11 4-12 Secondary Path Cross Section ........................................................................................................ 4-12 4-13 Multiuse Path Cross Section ............................................................................................................. 4-12 4-14 Canal Path Cross Section ................................................................................................................ 4-13 4-15 Major Trailhead Example ................................................................................................................. 4-13 4-16 Minor Trailhead Example ................................................................................................................. 4-13 5-1 Opportunities for Cooperative Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning ............................................. 5-16 Tables 2-1 Four Types of Cyclists .......................................................................................................................... 2-3 2-2 Levels of Traffic Stress .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maricopa Trail Intergovernmental Agreement
    Item 8 REPORTetn nmoii Meeting Date: March 21, 2017 General Plan Element: Open Space and Recreation General Plan Goal: Encourage and cooperate with other agencies to preserve and protect regional open space ACTION Resolution authorizing the City to enter in an intergovernmental agreement with Maricopa County regarding the Maricopa Trail. Adopt Resolution No. 10720 authorizing Intergovernmental Agreement No. 2017-038-COS with Maricopa County for trail signage and maintenance on the Maricopa Trail through the City of Scottsdale. BACKGROUND The Maricopa Trail is a 315 mile-long multi-use trail that connects major open spaces around the Phoenix metropolitan area. The trail was conceptualized by the Maricopa County Parks Department in 1997, with the goal of creating a continuous trail linkage between the various Maricopa County Regional Parks, and other significant regional open space areas, including the City of Scottsdale's McDowell Sonoran Preserve. The Maricopa Trail is established through two primary means: Constructing new trails for the sole purpose of being included as part of the Maricopa Trail, and designating previously existing or planned trails as part of the Maricopa Trail. The City of Scottsdale falls into the latter category, where certain existing routes within the city's trail and path network will be designated as part of the Maricopa Trail. Beginning in the early 2000's, staff from the city's Preservation Division worked closely with the planners from the county to identify existing and planned trails within the city's network that met the county's goal of regional connectivity. As the city's trail planning evolved and trails were constructed, staff from the city and county continued to work together to refine the designated route for the Maricopa Trail through the Preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Design Guidelines Is One Are an Adjunct to the City Development Code
    DOWNTOWN ONTARIO DESIGN GUIDELINES A FOR UNIQUE ONTARIO'S HISTORIC EXPERIENCE MODEL COLONY: MULTI-CULTURAL URBAN A GUIDE FOR THE FUTURE THAT HONORS OUR PAST T OP E D D A 8 1 9 8 9 A 1 U G U S T CCC Contents x DOWNTOWN ONTARIO DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ONTARIO'S HISTORIC MODEL COLONY: A UNIQUE MULTI-CULTURAL URBAN EXPERIENCE PRODUCED BY THE ARROYO GROUP, PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS & ASSOCIATED DISCIPLINES WITH PATRICK B. QUIGLEY & ASSOCIATES, LIGHTING CONSULTANT ADOPTED BY ONTARIO CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 18, 1998 D O W N T O W N O N T A R I O D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S i AcknowledgementsAAA City of Ontario City Council Downtown Revitalization Partnership Consultant Team Gus Skropos, Mayor City Council Representatives: The Arroyo Group Alan Wapner, Mayor Pro Tem Alan Wapner, Mayor Pro Tem Larry Morrison, AIA, AICP, Principal Gary Ovitt, Council Member Gary Ovitt, Council Member Simran Malhotra, AIA, Associate Jim Bowman, Council Member Herb Barnes, Graphic Designer Jerry DuBois, Council Member Debra Dorst-Porada, Chairperson Rick Caughman, Vice Chairman Patrick B. Quigley & Associates City of Ontario Planning Commission Sue Luce, Director, Secretary/Director, Ontario Patrick Quigley, Principal Public Library James Maletic, Chairman Steve Alvarado, Vice President, Foothill Debra Dorst Porada, Vice Chairman Independent Bank Richard Gage, Commissioner Yvonne Borrowdale, Resident Alexandro Espinoza, Commissioner Kathleen Brugger, Chaffey College Bob Gregorek II, Commissioner Angie Salas Dark, Ontario Historical Society/ DeAna Hernandez, Commissioner Friends of Olde Town Ontario Gabe DeRocili, Commissioner Mike Fortunato, City Commercial Management, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication DILA
    o Quarante-quatrième année. – N 68 B ISSN 0298-2978 Mercredi 7 et jeudi 8 avril 2010 BODACCBULLETIN OFFICIEL DES ANNONCES CIVILES ET COMMERCIALES ANNEXÉ AU JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE DIRECTION DE L’INFORMATION Standard......................................... 01-40-58-75-00 LÉGALE ET ADMINISTRATIVE Annonces....................................... 01-40-58-77-56 Accueil commercial....................... 01-40-15-70-10 26, rue Desaix, 75727 PARIS CEDEX 15 Abonnements................................. 01-40-15-67-77 www.dila.premier-ministre.gouv.fr (8h30à 12h30) www.bodacc.fr Télécopie........................................ 01-40-15-72-75 BODACC “B” Modifications diverses - Radiations Avis aux lecteurs Les autres catégories d’insertions sont publiées dans deux autres éditions séparées selon la répartition suivante Ventes et cessions .......................................... Créations d’établissements ............................ @ Procédures collectives .................................... ! BODACC “A” Procédures de rétablissement personnel .... Avis relatifs aux successions ......................... * Avis de dépôt des comptes des sociétés .... BODACC “C” Banque de données BODACC servie par les sociétés : Altares-D&B, EDD, Extelia, Questel, Tessi Informatique, Jurismedia, Pouey International, Scores et Décisions, Les Echos, Creditsafe, Coface services, Cartegie, La Base Marketing, Infolegale, France Telecom Orange, Telino et Maxisoft. Conformément à l’article 4 de l’arrêté du 17 mai 1984 relatif à la constitution et à
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dioxide Reduction Through Urban Forestry: Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters
    United States Carbon Dioxide Reduction Department of Agriculture Through Urban Forestry: Forest Service Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters Pacific Southwest Research Station General Technical Report E. Gregory McPherson James R. Simpson PSW-GTR-171 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 94701-0245 510 559-6300 http://www.psw.fs.fed.us/ techpub.html January 1999 Abstract McPherson, E. Gregory; Simpson, James R. 1999. Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: Guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW- GTR-171. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture; 237 p. Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry—Guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters has been developed by the Pacific Southwest Research Station’s Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education as a tool for utilities, urban foresters and arborists, municipalities, consultants, non-profit organizations and others to determine the effects of urban forests on atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction. The calculation of CO2 reduction that can be made with the use of these Guidelines enables decision makers to incorporate urban forestry into their efforts to protect our global climate. With these Guidelines, they can: report current and future CO2 reductions through a standardized accounting process; evaluate the cost-effectiveness of urban forestry programs with CO2 reduction measures; compare benefits and costs of alternative urban forestry program designs; and produce educational materials that assess potential CO2 reduction benefits and provide information on tree selection, placement, planting, and stewardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosemount Mciver Park Guidelines (PDF)
    Rosemount-McIver Park Guidelines Sanford, North Carolina Adopted 4-5-2016 - Revised June 27, 2016 Revised 5-23-2016 page 32 item g Acknowledgments: This document was created by a citizen’s appointed committee by the Chairman of the Historic Preservation Commission. The document was submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission to review and revise as they felt appropriate. The Historic Preservation Commission has revised these guidelines from the original that were submitted to the Historic Preservation Staff on February 7, 2011. This document has been years in the making and during that time frame the citizen committee changed members numerous times. The City of Sanford thanks all citizens who participated on the Revision of the Rosemount McIver Park Historic Guidelines, as well as the Historic Preservation Commission. City of Sanford web site: http://www.sanfordnc.net/index.htm Historic Preservation web site: http://www.sanfordnc.net/historic_preservation/hpc.htm Contact information: Historic Preservation 226 Carthage Street Sanford, NC 27330 919-777-1406 [email protected] 2 3 4 I. INTRODUCTION 5 I. INTRODUCTION This document is governed by and interpreted by he UDO Uniformed Development Ordinance which can be referenced at the Planning Office or on line at www.sanfordnc.net. A. Statement of Philosophy The North Carolina State Legislature has stated in N.C.G.S. 160A-400.1 that “the historical heritage of our State is one of our most valued and important assets. The conservation and preservation of historic districts and landmarks stabilize and increase property values in their areas and strengthen the overall economy of the State.” For these reasons, the State authorized its cities and counties: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan
    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Scalable Web-Embedded Volume Rendering
    Scalable Web-Embedded Volume Rendering Mohammad Raji *† Alok Hota *† Jian Huang † University of Tennessee University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Figure 1: Example webpages with embedded volume rendering. From left to right: NASA’s education outreach page on supernovae, a National Weather Service page on hurricane preparedness, the Wikipedia page on supernovae (viewed on a mobile device), and the Wikipedia page on tornadoes. Each embedded volume render appears as a static image but also allows traditional 3D interactions such as rotating and zooming, as well transfer function modulation. Additional interactions, such as scripted animation and linking and unlinking multiple views are also supported. ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION In this paper, we develop a method to encapsulate and embed inter- Web browsers have gradually become a popular front-end for sci- active 3D volume rendering into the standard web Document Object entific visualization applications. Many systems exist, such as Par- Model (DOM). The package we implemented for this work is called aViewWeb [16], ViSUS [24], and XML3D [30]. There are many Tapestry. Using Tapestry, data-intensive and interactive volume reasons driving the trend of merging web technologies into scien- rendering can be easily incorporated into web pages. For example, tific visualization delivery. Namely, the web browser is one of the we can enhance a Wikipedia page on supernova to contain several most familiar interfaces for users today. It is also readily the most interactive 3D volume renderings of supernova volume data. There platform-agnostic client software in modern personal computing. is no noticeable slowdown during the page load by the web browser.
    [Show full text]
  • Openaircn-5G Project Current Activities
    OpenAirCN-5G Project Current Activities Olivier CHOISY, b<>com Michel TREFCON, b<>com Luhan WANG, BUPT Tien-Thinh NGUYEN, EURECOM Outline . Introduction to OAI CN 5G project . Introduction to 5G Core Network . Current activities oMeetings, discussion between partners oCode generation for interfaces Demo oA prototype Implementation Demo . Roadmap Introduction . Open Air Interface Software Alliance o Core Network Software • Rel10/Rel14 Implementation • With ongoing development/maintenance . Initiative to start a 5G Core Implementation o Objectives : • Initiative to provide an Open source implementation of 5G Core Network as specified by 3GPP • Build a community to perform this implementation . How ? o New Software implementation (5G Skeleton then NFs) o Partners : Eurecom, b<>com, BUPT, Blackent, ng5T Introduction . Preliminary work (Eurecom/BUPT) Q3-2017 o HTTP/2, 5G SBA bus, … initial prototype . Initial workshop to start officially : 04/03/2018 (b<>com Paris) o Decision to start with a complete skeleton based on SBI/SBA 3GPP specifications (TS23.5xx,29.5xx) . 4 synchronization meetings with partners . Trello project follow-up . Progressive implication from partners expected . Q3/Q4 : initial SBA Interfaces implementation – on going Outline . Introduction to OAI CN 5G project . Introduction to 5G Core Network . Current activities oMeetings, discussion between partners oCode generation for interfaces Demo oPrototype Implementation Demo . Roadmap 5G – Service Trends and Usage Scenarios Service-Oriented 5G Core Network . Next Generation Network: To meet the needs of the range of services envisioned for 5G, with diverse performance requirements, across a wide variety of industries: Flexible, Scalable, and Customizable . Service Based Architecture o support a modularized service, flexible and adaptable, with fast deployment cycles and updates for launching services on demand in the network o a set of NFs providing services to other authorized NFs to access their services 5G System Architecture .
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Trail Guide
    WELCOME SAFETY TIPS SEASONS Mother Nature smiles on some cities more than others. Phoenix, Most of the mountain parks and preserves in Greater Phoenix are undeveloped Welcome to Greater Phoenix, America’s sunniest obviously, is blessed in the sunshine department. Sonoran Desert areas. Hikers may encounter rocky terrain, rattlesnakes, bees destination. and other hazards native to this ecosystem. These safety tips are crucial to Phoenix basks in sunshine more than any other major metropolitan area read before embarking on a hike in the desert. in the U.S. — during 85 percent of its daylight hours. And the cliché What sets Phoenix apart from every other big city in the that “it’s a dry heat” rings true: Humidity levels are pleasantly low, even United States is its Sonoran Desert scenery. Phoenix • Drink plenty of water. Bring at least 1 quart for short hikes, and in summer. is surrounded on all sides by mountains, and the sun 3-5 quarts for daylong hikes. When you’ve consumed half of your shines during 85 percent of daylight hours. water, turn around. The bottom line: Any time is a good time to visit the Sonoran Desert. • Make sure someone knows where you’ll be hiking and when you Phoenix has more acreage of parks and preserves than expect to return. WINTER • Hike with a friend. It’s safer … and more fun. any other major destination in the nation, and visitors @jacquelinehurst at Phoenix Mountain Preserve Trail #300 (Summit/Piestewa Peak) During the winter months Greater Phoenix enjoys blue skies and highs in • During hot-weather months, hike in the early morning or near dusk.
    [Show full text]
  • Wal-Mart Draft EIR Part I
    CITY OF SUISUN CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE - NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE WAL-MART WALTERS ROAD PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2006072026) September 17, 2007 TO: RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES TRUSTEE AGENCIES OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES SUBJECT: NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE WAL-MART WALTERS ROAD PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2006072026 ) OVERVIEW: The City of Suisun City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) to consider the potential environmental effects of the proposed Wal-Mart Walters Road Project (generally located on the northwest corner of Walters Road and State Route 12, Suisun City, CA). The proposed project requires the approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Application No. 06-08, Parcel Map 06-02, Sign Application No. 06-04, and Encroachment Permits to Local Streets. The project consists of approximately 230,000 square feet of commercial activities on approximately 20.1 acres. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: The DEIR found significant impacts related to Aesthetics, Light, and Glare, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Noise, Public Services and Utilities, Transportation, and Urban Decay. Many of these impacts were reduced to a less-than-significant level through the implementation of mitigation measures. However, even with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the DEIR found that the project would still result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Aesthetics (Visual Character) Air Quality (Long-Term Operational Emissions, Cumulative Impacts, Greenhouse Gas Emissions), Noise (Construction Noise, Stationary Noise Sources, Operational Noise – Vehicular Sources), and Transportation (Intersections Operations, Long-Term Intersection Operations, Queuing).
    [Show full text]
  • PRINT:OAS:Remain API Studio - Remain Software
    5/18/2020 PRINT:OAS:Remain API Studio - Remain Software PRINT:OAS:Remain API Studio From Remain Software Welcome to the index of the Remain API Studio. OpenAPI Specification (formerly Swagger Specification) is an API description format for REST APIs. An OpenAPI file allows you to describe your entire API. This editor helps you easily create and edit your OpenAPI file. Contents 1 Import OpenAPI 2 Export OpenAPI 3 Schemas 3.1 Add New Schema 3.2 Update Schema 3.2.1 Update Schema Name/Description 3.2.2 Update Schema Properties/Attributes 3.3 Delete Schema 3.4 Import Schema 3.5 Extract Schema From JSON Sample/Payload 3.6 Composite Schema 3.6.1 Add Sub-Schema 3.6.2 Change Sub-Schema (composite) Keyword 3.7 Schema Properties 3.8 Additional Properties 4 Paths 4.1 Add Path 4.2 Edit Path 4.3 Delete Path 4.4 Duplicate Path 4.5 Copy|Cut Operation 4.6 Parameters 4.7 Add global parameter 4.8 Add a path/operation parameter 4.9 Edit/Delete parameter 5 Operations 5.1 Add Operation 5.2 Update Operation 5.3 Delete Operation 6 Request Bodies 6.1 Add A Global Request Body 6.2 Add An Operation Request Body 6.3 Add Request Body Content Type 6.4 Delete Request Body Content Type 6.5 Add Schema to Request Body Content Type 6.6 Update Schema to Request Body Content Type 6.7 Delete Request Body 6.8 Update Request Body 7 Responses 7.1 Add new Response 7.2 Delete a Response 7.3 Update Response 7.4 Add new Response Content Type 7.5 Update/Delete Response Content Type 7.6 Update Response Content Type Schema 8 Tags 8.1 Add Global Tag 8.2 Add Operation Tag 8.3 Update Tag
    [Show full text]
  • Third Party Software Notices And/Or Additional Terms and Conditions
    Third Party Software Notices and/or Additional Terms and Conditions F20240-501-0240 2019.12.06 This page and/or pages linked from this page contain Third Party Software Notices and/or Additional Terms and Conditions applicable for each Matrox product that may be updated from time to time. It is the responsibility of the Licensee to verify that the agreements listed are current and applicable. Please note that this list is not exhaustive and was determined according to Matrox’s understanding and to the best of its knowledge. Note: Links using the GIT protocol require the use of a GIT tool. For more information, see https://git-scm.com/. Maevex 5100 Series Software Version Software Package Link License Version License Link Apache v2.2.22 http://archive.apache.org/ Apache 2.0 https://www.apache.org/l dist/httpd icenses/LICENSE-2.0 asoundlib (ALSA) v1.0.24.2 http://software- LGPL (Library 2.1 https://www.gnu.org/lice dl.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public General Public nses/old-licenses/lgpl- _sw/ezsdk/latest/index_FD License) 2.1.en.html S.html AutoMapper v3.1.0 https://www.nuget.org/pac MIT No version https://opensource.org/li kages/AutoMapper/ applicable censes/MIT Avahi v0.6.31 http://www.avahi.org/dow LGPL 2.1 https://www.gnu.org/lice nload nses/old-licenses/lgpl- 2.1.en.html Busybox v1.20.2 http://www.busybox.net/d GPL (General 2.0 https://www.gnu.org/lice ownloads Public License) nses/gpl-2.0.en.html Dropbear v0.51 http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dro MIT No version https://opensource.org/li pbear/releases applicable censes/MIT Glib v2.24.2 https://gstreamer.ti.com/gf
    [Show full text]