DOCSLIB.ORG

Fogera Woreda Pilot Learning Site Diagnosis and Program Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fogera Woreda Pilot Learning Site Diagnosis and Program Design Fogera Woreda Pilot Learning Site Diagnosis and Program Design January 2005 Table of Contents 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................3 2. Farming systems, crop and livestock priorities ....................................................................6 2.1. Description of Fogera Woreda.........................................................................................6 2.2 Priority Farming systems ...................................................................................................9 2.3 Priority crop commodities ...............................................................................................11 2.4 Livestock priorities ...........................................................................................................12 3. Institutions .........................................................................................................................15 3.1 Marketing.........................................................................................................................15 3.2 Input supply .....................................................................................................................16 3.3 Rural Finance ..................................................................................................................16 3.4 Agricultural extension service ..........................................................................................17 3.5 HIV/AIDS service ............................................................................................................18 4- Priority commodity description, analysis and potential interventions .................................19 5. Outline of program of work Fogera PLS ............................................................................36 5.1 Priority commodities and natural resource management technologies............................36 5.2 PLS knowledge management – general (RBM code 100 series).....................................36 5.2.1 School and Woreda Net................................................................................................37 5.3 PLS public institutional capacity building (RBM code 200 series)....................................38 5.4 PLS sustainable livelihood development (RBM code series 300)....................................40 5.4.1 Fish (Rice/Fish/Livestock System)................................................................................41 5.4.2 Apiculture (Cereal/livestock system).............................................................................44 5.4.3 Dairy and beef (Both systems)......................................................................................45 5.4.4 Poultry (Cereal/livestock system)..................................................................................47 5.4.5 Hide (Rice/Fish/Livestock System) ..............................................................................49 5.4.6 Noug (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.)................................................................................51 5.4.7 Vegetables (Pepper, onion, tomato) ............................................................................54 5.4.8 Rice (Oryza sativa L.) ..................................................................................................56 5.4.9 Chick Pea (Cicer arietinum L.).....................................................................................59 5.5 Recommendations on innovative technology (practices) and institutional innovations (400 series)....................................................................................................................................61 2 Map 1. The 10 Project Pilot Learning Sites (PLSs) in the Four Regional States .....................5 Table 1. Total population by holders and sex ..........................................................................6 Map 2. Altitude in Fogera Woreda ..........................................................................................7 Map 3. Annual Rainfall in Fogera Woreda ...............................................................................7 Map 4. Soil types in Fogera Woreda........................................................................................8 Table 2. Farming System by Ecological Zone in Fogera Woreda...........................................9 Map 5. Crop and livestock production in the Fogera plains ...................................................10 Map 6. Maize and pepper production and apiary in the mid and high altitude areas ............11 Table 3- Number of staff and educational level of the Woreda Office of Agriculture..............18 Table 4 : Rice ........................................................................................................................20 Table 5: Spices – pepper (Mareko fana variety – 12 Birr/kg).................................................22 Table 6: Oil Crops (Noug) System.........................................................................................25 Table 7: Pulses (Chickpea and lentils) Production.................................................................26 Table 8: Cattle (Dairy and Beef) Production System .............................................................27 Table 9: Fish..........................................................................................................................29 Table 10: Apiculture...............................................................................................................30 Table 11: Poultry....................................................................................................................32 Table 12: Extension system...................................................................................................34 Table 13. Project support for PLS knowledge management system (first year) ....................37 Table 14 Potential Woreda staff to be included in the innovative methods training ..............38 Table 15. Project support for PLS general capacity building support (first year.....................39 Table 15a. FTCs with potential for priority commodities and NRM technologies in the ice/Fish/Livestock system 40 Table 15b. FTCs with potential for priority commodities in Cereal/ Livestock system............40 Table 15c. FTCs with potential for NRM technologies in both farming system .....................40 Table 16. Project Support in fish marketing..........................................................................41 Table 17. Project support for fish input supply and improvement .........................................42 Table 18. Project support for fish production improvement...................................................43 Table 19. Project support for honey/wax marketing...............................................................44 Table 20. Project support for honey/wax input supply system ...............................................44 Table 21. Project support for honey/wax production improvement ........................................45 Table 22. Project Support for improving dairy products and beef marketing .........................45 Table 23. Project Support for dairy products and beef input supply system .........................46 Table 24. Project support for dairy products and beef production improvement....................47 Table 25. Project Support for poultry marketing ....................................................................47 Table 26. Project Support for poultry input supply system....................................................48 Table 27. Project support to improve poultry production........................................................49 Table 28. Project Support in hide marketing.........................................................................50 Table 29. Project Support in hide input supply system ..........................................................50 Table 30. Project support in hide production improvement system .......................................51 Table 31. Project support on marketing................................................................................51 Table 32. Project support on noug input supply....................................................................53 Table 33. Project support for noug production improvement ................................................53 Table 34. Project support for irrigated vegetables marketing.................................................54 Table 35. Project support for irrigated vegetable input supply system..................................55 Table 36. Project support for irrigated vegetable production .................................................56 Table 37. Project support in rice marketing improvement.....................................................57 Table 38. Project support on input supply of rice...................................................................57 Table 39. Project support for rice production ........................................................................58 Table 40. Project support for Chickpea marketing................................................................59 3 Table 41. Project support for Chick pea input supply system ...............................................60 Table 42. Project support for chickpea production................................................................60 Annex 1. Baseline data..........................................................................................................62
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report1
    PROJECT REPORT To: Austrian Development Agency NGO Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid Zelinkagasse 2, 1010 Vienna E-mail: [email protected] Project progress reports are to be presented by e-mail as contractually agreed. Originals of additional documents can be sent to the NGO Cooperation desk. Final Report1 Contract number: 2679-00/2016 Contract partner in Austria Local project partner Name: Name: CARE Österreich CARE Ethiopia Address: Address: Lange Gasse 30/4, 1080 Vienna, Austria Telephone, e-mail: Telephone, e-mail: +43 1 715 0 715 +251 911 237 582 [email protected] +251911819687 Project officer/contact: Project officer/contact: Stéphanie Bouriel Teyent Taddesse [email protected] [email protected] Worku Abebaw [email protected] Project title: Emergency Seed Support to Smallholder Drought- Affected Farmers in South Gondar Ethiopia Country: Ethiopia Region/place: Amhara /South Gondar Duration from: 29 Feb 2016 to: 30 November 2016 Report as at (date):November 30, 2016 submitted on: March 7, 2017 Invoicing as at (date) in euros Submitted for Total project costs Invoiced to date Outstanding verification as at (date) 430,000 EURO 424,598.14 EURO 424.598,14 EURO 5.401,86 Date, report written by CARE Ethiopia, February 2017 1 Delete as applicable NGO individual projects– version: January 2009 | 1 PROJECT REPORT 1. Brief description of project progress2 (German, max. 1 page) A drought due to the effect of El Niño phenomenon had impacted 10.2 million people in various regions of Ethiopia. South Gonder administrative zone located in Amhara region and comprising seven livelihood zones, was amongst the areas most affected.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA: FLOODS 6 September 2006
    Appeal no. MDRET003(revised) Glide no. FL-2006-000122-ETH ETHIOPIA: FLOODS 6 September 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in 185 countries. In Brief THIS REVISED EMERGENCY APPEAL SEEKS CHF 5,212,634 (USD 4,225,070 OR EUR 3,291,472) IN CASH, KIND, OR SERVICES TO ASSIST SOME 25,000 BENEFICIARIES FOR 9 MONTHS <click here to link directly to the attached Appeal budget> <click here to link directly to an overview map of the affected areas, or here for the acute watery diarrhoea (AWD) map> CHF 294,000 (USD 238,631 or EUR 185,969) was allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support this operation. Unearmarked contributions to the DREF are encouraged. The International Federation undertakes activities that are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda goals: • Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. • Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. • Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. • Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information specifically
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Value Chain Development in Fogera Woreda Based on the IPMS Experience
    Rice value chain development in Fogera woreda based on the IPMS experience Tilahun Gebey, Kahsay Berhe, Dirk Hoekstra and Bogale Alemu March 2012 Canadian International Agence canadienne de Development Agency développement international ILRI works with partners worldwide to help poor people keep their farm animals alive and productive, increase and sustain their livestock and farm productivity, and find profitable markets for their animal products. ILRI’s headquarters are in Nairobi, Kenya; we have a principal campus in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and 14 offices in other regions of Africa and Asia. ILRI is part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (www.cgiar.org), which works to reduce hunger, poverty and environmental degradation in developing countries by generating and sharing relevant agricultural knowledge, technologies and policies. © 2012 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy, duplicate, or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmit any part of this publication or portions thereof without permission, and to make translations, adaptations, or other derivative works under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION. The work must be attributed, but not in any way that suggests endorsement by ILRI or the author(s) NON-COMMERCIAL. This work may not be used for commercial purposes. SHARE ALIKE. If this work is altered, transformed, or built upon, the resulting work must be distributed only under the same or similar license to this one.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabies: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices in and Around South Gondar, North West Ethiopia
    diseases Article Rabies: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices in and Around South Gondar, North West Ethiopia Amare Bihon 1,* , Desalegn Meresa 2 and Abraham Tesfaw 3 1 School of Veterinary Medicine, Woldia University, Woldia 7220, Ethiopia 2 College of Health Science, Mekele University, Mekele 7000, Ethiopia; [email protected] 3 College of Veterinary Medicine, Samara University, Samara 7240, Ethiopia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +251-(0)9-4514-3238 Received: 24 December 2019; Accepted: 6 February 2020; Published: 24 February 2020 Abstract: A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2017 to assess knowledge, attitude and practices of the community towards rabies in south Gondar zone, Ethiopia. A structured closed ended questionnaire was used to collect the data through face to face interviews among 384 respondents. The data were then analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 20. Almost all (91.5%) surveyed individuals were aware of rabies. Bite was known as mode of rabies transmission by majority of the respondents (71.1%) with considerable means of transmission through wound contact with saliva of diseased animals. Sudden change of behavior was described as a major clinical sign of rabies in animals by the majority of the respondents. Nearly half of the respondents (48.2%) believed that consumption of rabid animal’s meat can be a medicine for human rabies and majority of the respondents (66.7%) indicated crossing a river before 40 days after dog bite increases severity of the disease. More than eighty percent of the respondents prefer traditional medicines for treating rabies in humans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Users at the Different Levels of Wash Projects
    Briefing note – No. 6 The Role of Users at the Different Levels of WaSH Projects Learning and Communications in WASH in Amhara Introductio n recommendations for increasing community management of WaSH in the Amhara Region. The In Africa and other developing countries, sustainability of rural water supply is quite low with 30 to 60% of the main research document will soon be available at schemes becoming non-functional at some point after www.wateraidethiopia.org and www.bdu.edu.et. implementation (Brikké and Bredero, 2003). The lack of community participation especially in management has been recognized as one of the reasons for the low Background sustainability (Carter.1999). For example, limited Harvey and Reed (2006) explain that “community involvement of the community at all stages of water participation does not automatically lead to effective development, the lack of a modest water service fee community management, nor should it have to. and a shortage of adequate skill and capacity to Community participation is a prerequisite for maintain water resources are specific aspects of sustainability, i.e. to achieve efficiency, effectiveness, community participation that have decreased equity, and replicablity, but community management is sustainability of rural water supply in the Amhara not. The community management in rural Ethiopia is Region of Ethiopia (Mengesha et al, 2003). based on the formation of water user committees All water supply providers in Ethiopia are currently usually at each water point in order to follow up the following the principle of community participation and implementation process, to manage the WaSH scheme community management in the rural area.
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Rice Market Participation in Libo Kemekem Woreda, Amhara Region
    International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities http://www.ijdssh.com (IJDSSH) 2019, Vol. No.8, Jul-Dec e-ISSN: 2455-5142; p-ISSN: 2455-7730 DETERMINANTS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS’ RICE MARKET PARTICIPATION IN LIBO KEMEKEM WOREDA, AMHARA REGION Endesew Eshetie University of Gondar College of Business and Economics Department of Marketing Management ABSTRACT Cultivation of rice in Ethiopia is generally a recent phenomenon. Rice has become a commodity of strategic significance across many parts of Ethiopia for domestic consumption as well as export market for economic development. This study was conducted in Libo Kemekem Woreda, Amhara Region. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the determinants of smallholder farmers’ participation in rice market. In this study three representative Kebeles were selected using multistage sampling technique. Then, sample household farmers were drawn by random sampling technique. Thus, 215 smallholder rice producer farmers were selected to the study, and through questionnaire and interview data were gathered. The collected data then be analyzed using SPSS and the results were interpreted and presented using descriptive statistics. Hence, the result revealed that 91.2% were male headed households and 8.8% were female headed. The minimum ageof participants were 29 and the maximum age was 70. About 94.9% of respondents were married, 3.3% were divorced, and 1.9% was separated; the major reason for growing rice was mainly for market. The result also identified about 98.1% smallholder farmer heads were members of cooperatives. On the contrary, farmers faced lack of improved seed and fertilizer, fear of crop failure due to unexpected rains and existence of different diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Amhara Region Administrative Map (As of 05 Jan 2015)
    Ethiopia: Amhara region administrative map (as of 05 Jan 2015) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abrha jara ! Tselemt !Adi Arikay Town ! Addi Arekay ! Zarima Town !Kerakr ! ! T!IGRAY Tsegede ! ! Mirab Armacho Beyeda ! Debark ! Debarq Town ! Dil Yibza Town ! ! Weken Town Abergele Tach Armacho ! Sanja Town Mekane Berhan Town ! Dabat DabatTown ! Metema Town ! Janamora ! Masero Denb Town ! Sahla ! Kokit Town Gedebge Town SUDAN ! ! Wegera ! Genda Wuha Town Ziquala ! Amba Giorges Town Tsitsika Town ! ! ! ! Metema Lay ArmachoTikil Dingay Town ! Wag Himra North Gonder ! Sekota Sekota ! Shinfa Tomn Negade Bahr ! ! Gondar Chilga Aukel Ketema ! ! Ayimba Town East Belesa Seraba ! Hamusit ! ! West Belesa ! ! ARIBAYA TOWN Gonder Zuria ! Koladiba Town AMED WERK TOWN ! Dehana ! Dagoma ! Dembia Maksegnit ! Gwehala ! ! Chuahit Town ! ! ! Salya Town Gaz Gibla ! Infranz Gorgora Town ! ! Quara Gelegu Town Takusa Dalga Town ! ! Ebenat Kobo Town Adis Zemen Town Bugna ! ! ! Ambo Meda TownEbinat ! ! Yafiga Town Kobo ! Gidan Libo Kemkem ! Esey Debr Lake Tana Lalibela Town Gomenge ! Lasta ! Muja Town Robit ! ! ! Dengel Ber Gobye Town Shahura ! ! ! Wereta Town Kulmesk Town Alfa ! Amedber Town ! ! KUNIZILA TOWN ! Debre Tabor North Wollo ! Hara Town Fogera Lay Gayint Weldiya ! Farta ! Gasay! Town Meket ! Hamusit Ketrma ! ! Filahit Town Guba Lafto ! AFAR South Gonder Sal!i Town Nefas mewicha Town ! ! Fendiqa Town Zege Town Anibesema Jawi ! ! ! MersaTown Semen Achefer ! Arib Gebeya YISMALA TOWN ! Este Town Arb Gegeya Town Kon Town ! ! ! ! Wegel tena Town Habru ! Fendka Town Dera
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance for Achieving Food Security in Ethiopia: Challenges and Issues
    57 Good Governance for Achieving Food Security in Ethiopia: Challenges and Issues Mussie Ybabe, Addis Ababa University Sisay Asefa, Western Michigan University Abstract Although rice technologies have been introduced in Fogera district over the last two decades, farm household’s food demand was not met as expected. Sustained, intensified and coordinated rice research is the key to curb the problem but impaired due to lack of good governance coupled with weak institutional capacity. This has resulted snowballing effects like little or no discussion among/with farmers on good practices, successes/failures of technology adoption and input delivery; poor linkage of small farmers to market and knowledge gap in Development Agents. Therefore, this study identified and evaluated potential determinants of household food security with basic emphasis to factors linked to good governance introduced to address the problem of food security in the study area through farm household rice technology adoption. A multistage sampling technique is used to select respondents. To this end, the primary data was gathered from the field survey by administering pre-tested structured and semi-structured questionnaire. Good governance dimensions of food security are evaluated using binary logit model for its comparative mathematical and interpretational simplicity. Farmers’ own perception of rice technology intervention vis-a-vis farm household food security is explored using focus group discussions supplemented by in-depth interviews. This study result would be primarily important in designing policy interventions and good governance strategies ensuring appropriate use of rice technology and tackle food security problems. Key words: Rice technology, logit model, good governance, food security Introduction Ethiopia is one of the most famine-prone countries with a long history of famines and food shortages.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter Personal Conflict Resolution Methods on Case of Land in Semadawerda, South Gonder Ethiopia
    ial Scien oc ce S s Bantihun and Worku, Arts Social Sci J 2017, 8:6 d J n o u a r DOI: 10.4172/2151-6200.1000315 s n t a r l A Arts and Social Sciences Journal ISSN: 2151-6200 Research Article Open Access Inter Personal Conflict Resolution Methods on Case of Land in SemadaWerda, South Gonder Ethiopia Abay Bantihun* and Melese Worku Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Debre Markos University, Deber Tabor, Ethiopia Abstract The study is about traditional interpersonal conflict resolution methods in the case of land in Arga and Asherakebele 16 in Simada Worda in the local community conflict resolution system was seen in this research study. Simadaworda Arga and Asherakebele the respondents of this research activity, from the total household 75 was selected, from those household 45 males and 30 females was selected based on sampling point. From sampling fighter 25 was selected, from those male 17 female 8, official experts was 24, from those 16 male and 8 female. From total respondent were selected 124, from those 78 males and 46 female. Most of the respondents result indicated that conflict arising by using inheritance problems from males 24.3% (19) and females 19.56% % (9), then problem related to boundary conflicts 34.6% (27 male and 16 female). Keywords: Simada Worda; Arga; Ashera; Inheritance; and investment in natural resources management [4], it is gaining Incompatibility; Traditional; Transparency traction in international development circles DFID [5], as well as in the environmental conservation and peace building communities [6,7]. Background of the Study Simadaworda one of the south Gondar zones, especially this worda Conflict is fundamental and predictable part of human existence.
    [Show full text]